Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Estimating Yearbook
8th Annual Edition
COMPASS INTERNATIONAL
COMPASS INTERNATIONAL
Table of Contents
Section / Reference Number
A-1 Introduction to Capital Cost Estimating:
The General Forecast for 2009 and beyond:
The Project Control Cycle:
Cost breakdown of a typical Chemical process facility:
The CAPEX Estimating process:
Presenting the estimate to Senior Management:
Optimizing the estimating effort:
A-2 - Capital Cost Estimating Fundamentals:
Questions that need to be asked:
The Estimating four step process:
Capital Cost Estimating Terms:
Estimating Types / Accuracy:
Engineering Deliverables & Budget:
Pricing to compile various estimates:
Resolution allowance / Undefined Scope Allowance:
Developing an Estimating Plan:
A-3 - Capital Cost Estimating Methods:
CAPEX estimating (10) approaches:
Various factoring methods:
Seven historical Ratio / M.E. percentage cost models:
Typical Solids, Fluids M.E. multiplying values:
General Process Industry Benchmarks
Summarizing the CAPEX Estimate:
A-4 - Basic Man-Hour Benchmarking Data & Reference Tables:
A-5 - Site Selection / Cost Data Sources / Estimating Checklist:
A-6 - Value Engineering / Change Orders / Claims / Contingency:
B-1 - Scale of Operations / Exponents (150 + Plants / M.E. items):
B-2 - Additional Estimating Factors Cost Models (7 examples):
B-3 - Square Foot / M2 Estimating Data (104+ Buildings /
Facilities) Revamp / Rehabilitation cost values.
B-4 - Unit Price Data (1,000+ unit cost items):
B-5 - General Cost Estimating Data.
Location Factors (200+ North American / International Cities):
International Location Factors / Productivity:
Engineering / Engineering / CM Fees:
Union Labor Costs (10 trades):
Open Shop Labor Costs (10 trades):
Sales Tax (50 US states and 10 Canadian Provinces):
Inflation / Compass Cost Index:
Rebar / Pipe / Concrete / Bricks Pricing (14 cities):
General Condition / Preliminaries Data:
Page Number
1 - 28
1 - 30
1 - 40
1 - 72
1 - 25
1 - 34
1-6
1 -14
1 - 13
1 - 40
1 - 24
1 - 85
1 - 59
SECTION A - 1
INTRODUCTION TO CAPEX ESTIMATINGAS IT RELATES TO FRONT END /
CONCEPTUAL - CAPEX ESTIMATING
Introduction to Front End / Conceptual Estimating: A Front End / Conceptual
estimate is an estimation of the cost of a proposed CAPEX project based on initial
conceptual engineering and design data, even though the specific details are not clearly
revealed or specified at this early stage of the proposed CAPEX project, an all-inclusive
value is required to determine the viability of the proposed undertaking.
A front-end estimate / conceptual estimate is usually the first step in the CAPEX
Estimating process. This publication has been compiled to assist all construction
professionals with an annual reference guide that will help them with quick reasonably
accurate construction prices for work associated with chemical plants, refineries,
manufacturing facilities and other related industrial plants. A vast number of challenges
and hurdles remain in place for Process / Manufacturing / Chemical companies (and
there decisions to build new / revamped facilities): as we look into the future as of late
2008, the issues to be faced in 2009 and beyond include numerous issues (that have
financial, construction and operating cost consequences) that will need to be gauged
and planned for, if the decision is made to proceed with the EPC effort. The Process /
Manufacturing / Chemical industry as the engineering / construction professionals knew
it in the early years of the last decade will have changed dramatically in the next two or
three decades. Emerging economies such as China, India, Brazil and South Korea to
name but a few will continue to forge ahead in developing their R & D and manufacturing
bases, there is an increasing anxiety in some of the more developed nations as to how
this will all play out and what impact this manufacturing / economic sea change will
have on the future employment opportunities, facility costs and engineering /
construction activities in Western Europe, North America and around the world, hopefully
this publication and its future updates will assist the reader in navigating the
understanding the dynamics of this situation, and the associated engineering /
construction related costs specific to Process / Manufacturing / Chemical facilities.
THE GENERAL FORECAST FOR 2009 AND BEYOND: (Specific to the Process /
Manufacturing / Chemical Industry and to the construction of these facilities).
Barack Obama won convincingly the 4th November 2008 American General
Election, he becomes the first African - American to take up office in the White
House and he will become Americas 44th President. Will his future policies have
an impact on global construction costs, only time will tell?
The worldwide economy is under extreme stress, this has been caused by the
global economic / finance downturn. Global construction activity will experience a
significant slowdown that could last anywhere from 2 4 years.
2009 will be a pivotal year for the global economy, trade imbalances, budget
deficits, the banking / finance problems, entitlement programs, energy prices just
a few of the issues that will impact the global economy and the global
construction market.
-1-
The enduring pain from the global finance / credit crunch is impacting all US /
Global construction sectors, the question is how long will it take for this malaise
to improve.
As much as 75% of all new refinery / gas plant construction projects have been
put on hold, with oil prices in the $35 - $45 a barrel range and with the possibility
that prices could go lower, it might be a long time before these projects come to
life again.
The actions of Russia and the Ukraine in blocking gas supplies to Western
Europe have still to play out; gas is still not flowing as of 1/17/2009.
The Israeli move into Gaza in early January, 2009 does not bode well for Middle
East peace and future construction prospects in the Middle East.
Inflation in the USA will continue to rise in 2009 averaging 3.5% for the year.
Volatile energy and food prices will be the main drivers of this significant rise in
prices.
The USA had a 7.2% unemployment rate in January, 2009; President Obama
hinted that this could rise to 10% by the end of 2009.
Uncertainties remain as oil and raw material prices increase relentlessly and then
decrease just as dramatically i.e. copper, steel, glass and lumber, it difficult to
forecast these costs as we move into 2009, will oil head back up to $140 again,
or will head south, below $30 a barrel, will we see another 1985.
Growing pessimism about the German, French Italian and UK economies as of
1st Q 2009 (they re all in recession) is impacting the Euro / Dollar exchange rate,
the forecast for the future growth of the Euro zone is cloudy going into 2009.
Spending on power plants, wind and solar facilities, and transmission lines
soared in 2008. In the USA it is forecast that 20 - 30 new nuclear power plants
will get green light to proceed in 2009. In the UK the Prime Minster announced
that 6 - 8 new nuclear plants will be ordered in the next year or two.
Construction related to US and overseas onshore oil and gas development will
slow down in 2009 with oil in the $40 a barrel range, $50 billion worth of tar sand
projects in Canada have been cancelled as of 1/2009, Saudi Arabia has
cancelled half a dozen major refinery projects also.
Some ethanol plants are now being delayed or cancelled, due to negative
publicity of increases in animal feed and food costs. With the increase in corn
prices, this could signal problems for ethanol industry, the 200 or so producing
ethanol facilities in US may have to be retrofitted to use a combination of switch
grass, sorghum, palm oil, hemp, wood waste bark, sawdust, sugar cane
rapeseed and possibly solid waste.
The US construction market related to automobiles, housing, and lodging will
slow or decline significantly in 2009.
Residential construction and commercial construction will decline in 2009 due to
the sub-prime lending crisis
Lumber prices in US have declined 10 - 12% in the last year due to drastic slow
down in housing market.
In 2009 will a continuing major interest / activity in Tidal / Hydro, Fuel Cell
Technology, Nuclear, Geothermal, Solar (Photovoltaic) Wind Power
The OECD reported in October 2008 that the Euro zone plus Japan economies
look to be entering a long period of recession for 2009 and 2010.
VW in mid 2008 announced the construction of a grass roots auto plant in
Tennessee, the facility will initially produce 150,000 cars per year, and the facility
is forecast to cost $990 million.
-2-
Some experts are forecasting $25 a barrel oil in 2009; this will stymie future
CAPEX oil and gas projects, most probably.
In the petro-chemical industry Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Iran are set to
become formidable players in the global oil / chemical market, these countries
could account for 30% of the world supply by the year 2011.
Will inflation experience a spike, with $120 oil and the pressure on commodities
this situation could change dramatically in 2009?
On the political front the USA faces some serious decision making situations in
2009 especially with a new President, specific to Russia and Georgia, North
Korea, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela and Pakistan (the next big problem country).
Globalization has had a awe-inspiring impact on the automotive, manufacturing
and the pharmaceutical industries, these industries are in transition, in the next 5
10 years there will be a significant consolidation, instead there being ten major
global players in each industry there will be five or less, these industries in many
ways are following the same flight path / happenings of the US airline industry,
remember Pan Am, TWA, and Eastern Airlines in the 1990s history has a habit
of repeating itself.
The growth in infrastructure and general construction projects around the globe is
producing strong demand for qualified engineering and construction professional
and skilled workers, this situation plus the spike in escalation is causing
significant shortages in the global construction market, this publication has been
produced to assist various construction professionals with a road map to
navigate through these complex procurement issues.
Geopolitical risks include:
1. The world economic downturn (could it turn into a depression).
2. Iran producing an atomic bomb and the ramifications of this.
3. Venezuela flexing its regional muscle and its future nationalization
policy, with falling oil prices this problem may go away.
4. Russias future energy policy, consider the recent gas disruption
(1/2009). Lower energy prices are not good for Russia growth
plans.
5. The continuing war against al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Additional topics and questions that could impact the Process / Manufacturing /
Chemical companies in 2009 - and consequently the engineering / construction
marketplace, include:
The recent hostilities between Russia and Georgia, together with Ukraine (gas
shutdown) and the consequences of these to the global construction market:
Worldwide population growth, especially in Asia and South America, we will most
probably see 8 billion people on the planet by 2015.
China and India are seeking long term toll manufacturing / supply contracts
countries such as Brazil, Venezuela, Nigeria, Angola, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Iran,
Qatar and the UAE, these countries in the past dealt exclusively with North
American and Euro zone chemical / manufacturing companies
The rapid pace of technology advancements: (wireless technology / faster chips /
communications etc.).
The chemical / manufacturing industry will continue to focus on reducing
production / manufacturing costs.
-3-
The rapid increase of commodity prices, such as steel, copper, aluminum, lumber
and cement.
The drive by big North American, Western European and Japanese Automobile /
Chemical / Consumer Product companies to establish a manufacturing presence
in China and India, this trend should continue for another decade at least.
The globalization and integration of the world economy: with countries such as
Brazil, China and India becoming global players in the next five years.
The ongoing U.S.A. Trade imbalance: and the consequential impact of a falling
US dollar to the world economy, this trend seems to have relented as of
September 2008.
Increases in military hardware and manpower expenditures by China: and its
future worldwide consequences.
The impact of $147+ a barrel oil (as of June, 2008) and the economic impact this
will have on the worlds economy and the drop in price to $40 in January, 2009.
The ability for Automobile / Capital goods manufacturers to develop and to bring
to market there products more rapidly, the use of 3D / digital design to ensure
that piping / utility collisions are avoided in the design and construction process,
thus minimizing re-work and generally speeding up the design process.
To see how things have changed in this industry in the last five years is the fact that
China will have a construction market as large as or bigger than the USA in the next
decade or two, the lions share of future CAPEX expenditures appear to be headed
overseas, it would appear that the days of big corporate engineering / estimating
departments would be over in North America. This situation was one the main driver for
producing this database, the publisher of this database determined that there would be a
need for this type of information, the writer(s) have always wanted an estimating note
book that they could carry around with them to produce or audit / check CAPEX
estimates hence the creation of this book and its companion publications. The
(CAPEX) capital cost for the Engineering, Procurement and Construction project (s)
comprises of all the expenditures associated with the primary creation of the specific
plant or facility: this usually embraces the following described direct and indirect
construction and engineering related elements: Project Control (Capital Cost
Estimating, Planning and Cost Engineering) is understanding were the project is in
relation to its planned goals, it is being aware of where the project is headed and
communicating these findings with the appropriate project stakeholder so that
constructive mid course solutions can be implemented to maintain or improve the current
budget and schedule, this publication is focused on the activity of Conceptual Cost
Estimating CAPEX estimating, a flow diagram is depicted on the following pages
indicating how conceptual cost estimating fits into the overall Project Management /
Control cycle. CAPEX estimating specific to future capital expenditures related to
Process / Manufacturing / Chemical facilities involves the collection, review and
condensing a wide assortment of information and data, some of the more significant
items and work tasks are as follows: (1) Owner front-end costs including internal ROI
studies and marketing analysis reviews, Research and Development costs. (2) Property
or land purchase or leasing / lease back arrangements, including perhaps third party
tolling arrangements (including any site improvements and modifications). (3) Production
of Front End Engineering Architectural Design Deliverables - Any front-end
architectural or engineering economic - feasibility studies completed internally or by a
third party i.e. A / E or EPC firm: (4) Production of the Issued for Construction - The
Architectural - Engineering (A / E) (EPC) design effort (production of specifications and
-4-
design drawings and project design deliverables) including reproduction expenses and
associated travel costs. (5) Project Management activities associated with directing the
CAPEX project includes owners and contractors staff. (6) Procurement activities the
buy-out of the work (scope), i.e. purchase orders and construction contracts: (7) The
actual field construction effort, including site purchasing together with major equipment
(which could be bought out in the home office, bulk and engineered materials, i.e.
concrete, stone and lumber. (8) Field indirect support including field supervision of the
construction scope, trailers, storage sheds / small tools and consumables. (9)
Construction equipment requirements i.e. cranes, welding equipment and the
subsequent maintenance of this equipment, and Field establishment i.e. (Division 1 or
General Conditions / Preliminaries): (10) Construction Management of the project,
including any third party NDT inspection / testing requirements, and, (11) Other items
could include contractors overhead, fees, freight, bonding; insurance (BAR and workers
compensation) and local state taxes / B&O taxes, (VAT / GST on overseas applications),
tariffs and duties, specific to the project. There are a bunch of related matters (perhaps
we could call it (12) that may need to be considered includes: expense items
(relocation), demolition work, owner provided equipment / materials free issued to the
contractor, furniture and fixtures, spare parts, initial chemicals and vendor assistance,
start-up expenses, commissioning and possible validation activities. The extent of each
of the above cost elements of course is based on the type of facility (i.e. unique first of
its type (needing new utilities or an continuing ongoing production facility, that has a
history and has an existing utility infrastructure in place), magnitude or scale of operation
small operating unit i.e. 2 or 3 operators or a toll manufacturing plant or a large
operation with 100s of plant operators, its operation 24 / 7 / 365 days or 8:00 to 5:00,
plant control philosophy and the actual location of the CAPEX project (s) North America
or overseas. The essential principles of Project Control are to provide the best technical
and business solution to the business unit contemplating a new facility expansion(s) or
upgrade(s). The initial description of a project scope begins at project commencement, it
is accomplished with the establishment (creation) of an approved design basis that is
accepted by management (accepted to a least go to the next step of project approval
cycle), this particular section will not get into how the scope of a capital project is
developed, however its purpose is to provide basic details of how to successfully
estimate early / front end scopes of work. An accurate Front End / Conceptual Cost
Estimate can be the first step in the successful execution of a capital project, this first
capital cost estimate should provide the project team with early (a budgetary and an
initial path forward document) - information specific to cost, schedule, manpower
requirements for the usual activities associated with a Engineering, Procurement and
Construction (EPC) project, the tasks that will derive benefit from this first estimate are:
-5-
corporate engineering, corporate finance personnel and the business units senior
management (the folks that will take ownership of the completed facility) this decision is
one in which the cost estimator can play a significant role in finalizing the manufacturing
process and possibly selection of the final site location, what are some of the key site
selection factors that need to be analyzed and estimated, some of these factors are
listed below, what is the 5-10-15 year growth plan for this facility / and or product, is this
were future growth for this product will occur, i.e. South East. Asia (China or India) or
South America, were should the new facility be built, at an existing company owned
facility, on a new grass roots location, or should we renovate an existing facility to
accommodate this new product, should the capital cost estimate include land purchase,
is any demolition or site remediation costs to be evaluated, are there differing
manufacturing process (steps) that can be used, are there cost differences in the
operating costs of these processes, will the new facility be given grants, tax holidays and
or incentives by the state or country that the new facility will be located?, will this facility
new or add on require new services and utilities, will we need to train / educate the plant
operators, will the new plant require state of the art control systems, or can we obtain a
competitive advantage by using low cost labor to operate the plant and minimize costs
on the I/C account, lots of questions need to be tabled and answered during the CAPEX
estimating effort. These questions and many more will have to be analyzed in some
detail prior to proceeding with the prospective CAPEX project. In the early phases of the
project the Front End / Conceptual Cost Estimate should provide a framework to
measure trends and to determine key project milestones.
The number one indispensable principle of Project Control Cost Estimating is to deliver
the best technical and business solution to the business unit considering or bidding on a
new facility expansion(s) or upgrade(s), together with value (which of course is part of
the business solution) for future CAPEX investments, the project team must deliver the
correct business solution at the front end stage(s) of CAPEX project, the scope, needs to
be to some extent defined, some front end design work (basic design) needs to have
been completed, various manufacturing / production schemes need to have been
considered and scoped out to determine there viability. The decision to engineer /
procure and construct (EPC) a new Chemical / Manufacturing Facility, or to upgrade,
revamp or modernize an existing facility is many times based on future business growth,
maintaining market share and to ultimately to increase profits and ROI. Chemical /
Manufacturing Facilities must be designed to meet the goals of (1) Safety, (2) Quality of
final product and (3) Profit Return on Investment. The conceptual estimator / engineer
is an person who can predict / analyze the future cost of an Engineering, Procurement
and Construction (EPC) project(s) with a very modest (minimal) amount of real data
regarding the details of the project (basically there are no detailed design deliverables at
this stage the future CAPEX project is in its infancy, very much in the speculative or
conceptual mode), typically these types of estimates are required at the very front end /
early stages of a project, they are typically used to:
1. Evaluate the capital costs associated with a new or add on to a current facility. In
addition they can be used to determine the viability of producing new products at
a certain location. They can also be used to audit and initially checkout the
proposal of an A/E firm or EPCM contracting company.
2. Used in the traditional annual or five year capital expansion / forecasting effort
i.e. does the business outlook in Chile enable the project to produce an attractive
ROI now or in the next two years.
-6-
3. Used as a tool to determine the best EPC approach to maximize the owner
companies Return on Investment (ROI). They can also be used as the
management go / no go decision tool.
The Project Control cycle - is the methodical review and analysis of the projects (Scope
of Work) from a cost / schedule standpoint. The following flow chart demonstrates the
coordination that is required to have accurate Project Control on a CAPEX Project.
Project Manager
Engineering Data
Procurement Data
Construction Data
Project Controls
Cycle
Capital
Estimating
Planning /
Scheduling
Cost
Engineering
Regular updates / communications to the Project Manager of any departures from the
current cost estimate and schedule and counseling the Project Manager / Project Team
on any potential (EPC) problems is the job of the Project Controls Group and possible
solutions that will ensure the projects budget and schedule is maintained or optimized,
this publication focuses on Capital Cost Estimating element of the above Project Control
Cycle. The foremost purpose of the compilation of a capital cost estimate is to transform
engineering / design, procurement and construction deliverables and data into an
accurate prediction of current and or future construction cost(s).
Capital Cost Estimates (CAPEX) - what are they used for:
Issues and factors that can influence a capital cost estimate, this list together with other
data within this publication should be used as a checklist to ensure that the cost
estimating effort is completed and fully budgeted (i.e. scoped out):
-7-
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Issues and factors that can impact the bottom line of a CAPEX Estimate
Engineering
Production of design deliverables / specifications (who produces Owner or EPC
firm / when).
C / S / A design deliverables (who produces / when).
Process Flow Diagrams (who produces Owner or EPC firm / when).
E/I design deliverables / Control Philosophy / Classification (does owner have a
preferred vendor who produces outline spec / when).
Piping design and detailing (who produces does this exist has Owners
Engineering group produced the first draft of this document / when).
Relevant codes to be utilized.
Other Engineering issues.
Procurement
Long lead items (M.E. items) some complex items such as a multi-stage
compressor could take as long as twelve months to design and produce.
Freight issues.
Import duties.
Bulk material purchasing.
Expediting.
Inspection / trafficking / performance testing.
Warehousing.
Early delivery bonuses / payments.
Other Procurement issues i.e. spare parts, vendor assistance.
Construction
Location of facility (USA or Overseas).
Weather issues (cold or hot climate).
Productivity expectations of workforce.
Union / Non union / Merit Shop construction approach.
Plant start up activities.
Labor availability and possible overtime / shift work requirements.
Protection of the completed work.
General Conditions / Preliminaries.
Construction equipment usage.
Establish camp / Establish concrete batch plant.
All required permits.
Small tools / Consumables.
Guards / Security.
Special safety issues.
Cleaning protocols / special requirements.
Project Specific items
Completion date (Normal schedule or fast track schedule).
Escalation / Taxes.
Operator Training issues.
Owner costs / Owner provided items.
Contractual issues / Type of contract.
Warranty issues (procure extended warranty period).
Payment terms / Financing costs.
Currency impact issues.
Insurance issues (BAR / Umbrella / Bonds).
-8-
10
11
12
The following pages and sections A -1, A -2 and A -3 of this database will describe in
some detail, the following types of capital cost estimates, a more complete description of
these estimates and hybrids of these estimates are discussed in section A-3.
The following table will give the reader an appreciation of were the big cost drivers are
in a typical chemical facility project, not surprisingly these values will not be the same for
each specific facility, however these values can be used as a benchmark or guide, the
percentages are based on numerous (30+) projects that have been executed in the last
ten years, they are a mix of new and revamped CAPEX projects with perhaps 70% of
the data coming from new $5 - $45 million chemical and manufacturing facilities.
Typical Cost Breakdown of a new Chemical / Process related Facility (constructed on an
existing facility with available utilities that may need some upgrading):
Category
Major Equipment (includes freight) the value for
freight is 3%. For overseas applications requiring
ocean freight this number could increase, ocean
freight typically is 7% - 10% of the M.E. value.
Materials (Bulks / Engineered).
Labor costs including sub-contractors.
Field In directs / General Conditions / Preliminaries.
Detailed Design / H O support / Procurement / PM
(includes Owner Engineering) Includes all necessary
-9-
Percentage Value
22.9
Percentage Range
18 - 27
21.5
24.3
11.7
13.9
17 -26
19 - 29
9 - 13
10 - 17
design deliverables.
Construction Management (incl CM Gen Conditions)
Total
5.7
100.0
4-8
100.0
Note: These values are appropriate to Inside Battery Limits (ISBL work) Outside
Battery Limits (OSBL scope / work) is not included in above values. Contingency is
included in above values (it has been pro-rated into the above percentages). The activity
of capital cost estimating is at best a time-consuming and an easier said than done
undertaking, trying to forecast the many project variables such as weather, productivity,
labor costs, major equipment, field in directs, bulk material quantities and unit costs,
taxes and escalation and to attempt to look into the future, say two or three years is very
difficult and demanding, encumbered with potential dangers (future events are of course
difficult to anticipate, for example, who would have thought in the early 2000s that a
barrel of oil would cost $140 + a barrel in January of 2009 and then drop like a stone to
$35), hopefully this publication will shed some light on this important topic(s).
A CAPEX capital cost estimate can be considered as one of the following:
The bottom line cost / bid for completing an Engineering, Procurement and
Construction effort, it is the work effort of determining all the numerous cost
elements which will be required for a particular activity / (EPC) construction
project and arriving at a total cost value for completing the itemized scope of
work (basically a shopping list of required items).
A cost summary together with a description of work (scope of work / mission
statement) specific to a project to be performed or considered.
A current photograph / snapshot of an (EPC) project(s) current scope of work
together with a cost value of its anticipated final cost.
A judgment / opinion of final cost by a person(s) / cost engineer(s) / cost
estimator(s) / project team that has considered the SOW to be performed.
This data source and the basic focus of this publication is targeted primarily at the
manufacturing / process industry / chemical engineering / pharmaceutical / industrial
sectors, 60% to 70% of the cost estimating / benchmarking data contained in this data
source is targeted on these specific industry sectors, however it is not aim of the
database to exclude other construction industry sectors, some of the following
benchmarks and data can be use in estimating the cost of General Buildings (Airports,
Logistic centers / Warehouses, Office facilities, Public Buildings, Schools, together with
civil engineering related projects etc.) some of this data is outlined / indicated in section
B 3, B 4 and C 1, this data can be used in the production of cost estimates for other
specific / one off engineering and construction discipline items such as demolition, civil,
site work, architectural, engineering and construction management fees, mechanical,
electrical and instrumentation / controls and insulation (refer to section A 4 and D 1 for
examples of these topics) which may be required and budgeted using similar / parallel
conceptual / front end estimating methods and procedures described in this data source,
this should allow a cost estimator the ability to compile a reasonably accurate front end
CAPEX estimate. The main goal of this publication is to assist the user in not dropping
the ball and making erroneous front end / conceptual type capital estimates and
basically to provide a more focused and disciplined approach in producing a more
accurate and concise front end / conceptual estimate(s) i.e. to shed some light on an
- 10 -
area of cost estimating that can be a challenge to new young estimators that are starting
out in this business and need an initial road map to get started. The responsibilities,
mission statement and basic activities of capital cost estimating (the job) is for all
intents and purposes a data gathering activity (getting your arms around the projects
scope and documenting it), it includes reviewing design documents (design deliverables
drawings and specifications and scopes of work) if they exist and the preparing a takeoff / shopping list of scope items that need to be completed in the execution of the
CAPEX project, in addition it includes gathering local construction cost data, local
material costs, field crew productivity / production statistics, determining contracting
methods, plus a host of other cost related issues.
Capital cost estimating is a four step process; these four basic estimating steps are as
follows. (This assumes that the cost estimator has read and absorbed the current scope
of work and reviewed the current engineering deliverables that currently exist).
1. Familiarization - Site visit / investigation (if timing allows)
2. Quantities Effort - Quantity take-off (shopping list of required items),
the quantification of all the necessary items needed and depicted
upon the preliminary and final design drawings
3. Costing Routine / Effort - Collection and selection of pricing /
benchmarking data.
4. Finalizing the CAPEX Estimating Effort - Summarization of this data,
is the work effort of calculating all the costs which will be required for
a particular activity / construction project and arriving at a total cost
value for performing the (EPC) work.
They say money make the world go round, - CAPEX funds whether they be dollars,
pounds, yen or euros and the subsequent cash flow of these funds and the profit that is
realized as they relate to the implementation / execution of the CAPEX project, is the
oxygen of any profit motivated construction / manufacturing related organization (Owner
/ EPC firm), many times it is identified as the bottom line, selling price, required funds,
contract price, P & L (profit and loss), anticipated or final bid cost. Cash Flow - Money
and the management of it, is of acute importance in estimating / cost engineering and
project management, as is the essential metrics of knowing the current status of the
project and the performance to date and how much it will cost to complete the work
remaining (forecast to complete), i.e. are we making a profit or loss on this project, how
does it measure up against the original capital cost estimate, (basically we are
performing ongoing benchmarking activities as the project proceeds). Each and every
able cost engineer / estimator / project manager must become familiar with basic cost
estimating methods, procedures and techniques that were touched on earlier (and are
mentioned in some detail in the first three sections of this publication) i.e. the visit to the
site to collect data (project specific information), the take-off routine, the pricing effort
together with the summarization of all the relevant data, the cost engineer / cost
estimator must also have a basic knowledge of the background / supporting data that is
the estimate based upon, i.e. scope of work project definition, additionally they should
understand basic accounting principals, cost control methods, value engineering
principals, cash flow and profit generation specific to their current project(s) to be
beneficial to there employer and there clients, these are important attributes that can not
be learnt overnight, it could take 3 5 years to get up to speed with these issues. The
important attributes / skills of a cost estimator are:
- 11 -
The best cost estimator (the one with the best potential) that the writer has come across
in the last twenty years is a young engineer with 3 5 years experience his filing and
data collection skills were first class, he was never at a loss when questions were asked
of him, he did his homework, his estimates were accurate and well prepared, he kept his
own audit trail (a large three binder that contained all the relevant estimating / pricing
data). As has been touched upon, the forte and skill set of the professional estimator /
cost engineer must be comprehensive - they should have an appreciation of all
construction disciplines i.e. CSI Division 1 - 16, the most important prerequisite is the
ability to look into the future (crystal ball and tea leaf readersapply here.) and the
second most important trait is the ability to get along with people and be a team players
(being able to communicate and collect relevant data with or from the other team
members is very important squeezing out all of the relevant data from the team
members is important), complete with the skill of being able to cut through all the details
and focus on the specific cost drivers of the future / current EPC project. A number of
the more important qualities and basic traits are Business Acumen (understanding the
importance of cash flow, change management i.e. change orders / claims, negotiations
with clients / vendors / sub contractors). Knowledge of the construction process i.e. the
understanding of the following main categories (1) Construction / Engineering /
Procurement / Construction Management, field experience is a definite advantage: (2)
Communications and Computer skills (computer skills are becoming increasingly more
important in this business environment): (3) Team Player / People Skills as was
mentioned above (work individually or as part of a team): (4) Time Management (create
shortcuts and ability to think outside the box): Additional know-how that would be
beneficial to an Owner or EPC organization is the aptitude to visualize each physical
engineering, procurement and construction activity / operation (and how they impact /
ripple into each other fitting all the pieces of the puzzle together) that is required to be
integrated into the construction project, and how each activity / work effort fits into the
total / whole scope of work (big picture), and to interpret the extensive and less
significant details into accurate and detailed total cost budget / cost elements, ensuring
that the scope (the intent of the design team is captured in the take-off process is
followed as carefully as possible). One of the main prerequisites of professional
estimator / cost engineer is to ask questions and to question the feedback and answers
that are provided by his or hers questions. The preponderance of seasoned cost
engineers / estimators, individuals that have been involved with estimating for more than
five years have in many cases collected and formulated there own personal estimating
libraries during their career(s), many times when these individuals retire these libraries
are lost, or thrown out, the exercise of this publication is to download the writers own
extensive library and some of his co-workers / colleagues and to make it available to
rookie and journeymen / women cost engineers / cost estimators joining the industry.
- 12 -
This important and vital subject matter i.e. Front End / Conceptual Estimating is a data
source that cost engineers and estimators are constantly searching for on a day too day
basis (hopefully this data source will be beneficial to the reader on future Front End /
Conceptual cost estimating activities). For the reasons just touched on, the author(s)
after years of searching / compiling and collecting this type of process related capital
cost estimating data decided to summarize there thoughts and views on this subject in
an effort to fill this void, without getting too deep / long winded and detailed, which is
hard to do on a such a large and complex topic, the book is aimed at giving the reader
the headlines of various cost estimating items, a quicker way of arriving at a cost.
All CAPEX capital cost estimates have one universal objective, they provide the basis for
management action (go or no-go or go back and re-work the numbers), how much will
this project cost, what is the ROI, can we buy this product from a Toller, does it make
economic sense to build this proposed facility, should we expand this facility, were
should we locate this facility in North America, Europe or in South East Asia, questions
and more questions that need to be resolved. For those reasons to assemble and
compile accurate (CAPEX) capital cost estimates historical data and benchmarking data
is required, this means that a source of easy to use and precise up to date historical /
current cost specific data is essential, this data should be broken down basically into
quantities of materials, labor man-hours and total dollars (money), the data source could
be via the use of in-house return data or proven third party external resources, i.e.
estimating books / pricing catalogs that are up to date. Annually or real time updated i.e.
current capital cost estimating data sources (material unit costs, man-hour installation
units, construction equipment plant and productivity adjustments) - (calibrated to a key
location(s) i.e. U.S. Gulf coast, Washington D.C or the North Western area of the UK)
are what is needed this data can provide Owners and EPC firms a competitive
advantage over there competitors. There are today numerous capital cost estimating
systems / procedures / methodologies both computerized and hard copy and perhaps
half a dozen or more reference books being used in the EPC industry to generate capital
cost estimates. One of the main problems with some of these cost data reference books
is that these the data is focused primarily on general construction, i.e. housing,
remodeling, office buildings, schools etc (low tech construction as it referred to). The
basic focus of the data contained within this publication is the process / manufacturing /
chemical industries and to some extent the pharmaceutical sector of the construction
industry, the data in this publication reflects man-hour benchmarks, bulk materials,
capital major equipment (CAPEX equipment), EPC construction practices, labor rates
(union & non union or merit shop), schedule of rates / unit prices, engineering costs /
fees, owner costs, plant / construction equipment. Capital cost estimates may be and
are prepared and compiled at any point in the projects life cycle development, from the
initial early stages 0% to perhaps 5% of the design has been established, to defined /
complete engineering stages (the detailed design may be 70% - 100% complete) of the
project. An example of this early estimate is (Identification / Conceptual / Business
Concept Estimate ) as it is sometime referred to (little or no engineering produced
real lack of engineering documentation - i.e. engineering deliverables and reports, the
only document might be a preliminary major equipment list) the estimate is compiled by
multiplying the major equipment items by a factor to arrive at a total installed cost, this
early stage estimate would need perhaps 20 25% contingency to cover risks and lack
of project definition, the next update of the estimate would be a preliminary stage
estimate, possibly 10 - 20% engineering phase is compiled, we would need less
contingency because we know more about the project (and we have less risk going
forward), the semi detailed execution phase submission would perhaps be the next
estimating step or update, perhaps, 20 - 50% of the detailed design completed, again
- 13 -
more is known about the project and we would basically need less contingency, and last
but not least the lump sum / turnkey bid / hard money estimate (proposal or budget),
perhaps 50% - 100% of the detailed design in completed (pricing from vendors and sub
contactors is typically available), the contingency requirements with this detailed
estimate may be less than 10% and could be as low as 5%.
A detailed estimating plan i.e. a plan that lists various engineering deliverables and
required data is described in Section A - 2 of this publication.
Prior to getting up to speed / on board with the basics of conceptual capital cost
estimating techniques, there are number of basic fundamentals / terms and
methodologies that will be discussed and described via tables and charts in this and
subsequent sections. This initial section A-1 is devoted to describing a few basic capital
cost estimating goals / tasks / perceptions (a view down from 30,000 feet) and methods
that are utilized (in some organizations) in the Process / Chemical / Manufacturing
(PCM) industries, section A-2 discusses capital cost estimating fundamentals, section A3 discusses and describes various capital cost estimating methods, the remaining
sections drill down into more detailed estimating data. Many EPC projects are
successful, it was estimated correctly, it was built on time and it produces the specified
material / product that it was design to produce, however perhaps 10% 30% are
unsuccessful (the capital budget was exceeded, the plant was handed over late and the
facility is not producing the product in the quantities it was designed for or to the
specification required), no one wants this situation. Loosing money on EPC (CAPEX)
projects is the reality all companies face today, this situation has occurred since Adam
was a boy, cost over runs are not a new event although such incidences seem to be
more customary in recent years, perhaps because more CAPEX projects are being
undertaken now than in the 1960s and 1970s (many times because goals are set
unrealistically high) this is because interactions / communications are much more
widespread (the curse of e mail, more individuals seem to be in the loop and have input
into the day to day business running of the project), everyone always remembers bad
news, cost over runs have happened in the past and guess what they will happen in the
future. Some of the reasons that this situation seems more prevalent today are:
Failure to scope out and estimate the project and failure to recognize the risks
associated with the project.
Clients are trying to get to the marketplace quicker, to beat there competitors to
the punch (it seems everyone is in a rush these days).
Less CAPEX dollars are available now and this will be the same possibly in 2009
and 2010 (refer to next point).
Many major projects are being built in S.E. Asia (China and India are currently
experiencing significant inflows of CAPEX from North American and Western
European operating companies, however with the recent credit crisis this seems
to have slowed down) and in other remote locations (language, culture, time
differences all add to the challenge).
Companies are trying to do more with less money (i.e. CAPEX spending in USA
down between 50 60% since 2000, less qualified staff are available than
previously).
Many projects are built using fast track engineering and construction methods.
A lot of the old hands have retired, Corporate Engineering groups have
downsized, and Project Managers are getting loaded up with additional
- 14 -
responsibilities, it seems that more and more reports are needed now,
construction professionals are working harder now than they did in the past.
The capital cost estimate, be it a five page Front End study or a detailed 500+ page
document with hundreds of line items (is a dynamic and living document) it is a listing
of basic assumptions, a priced out shopping list of the owners (projects) needs,
(hopefully it corresponds to the needs of the client) its end result, at best can only be a
forecast / educated opinion / snapshot of the funds needed to complete the scoped out
work of the individual(s) involved in the engineering, procurement and construction
scope definition and estimating effort. The cost estimator more often than not develops
the path forward / road map of the estimating process (and is the focal point of the
estimating effort refer to Section A-2 for information on the Estimate Plan), it is he or
she who should determine the estimating plan, who does what and when - with
management buy-in of course, what are the required engineering and procurement
deliverables needed to produce the capital cost estimate, do we require vendor quotes
and layout sketches, it is the cost estimators / cost engineers function to determine the
resources, tasks, construction equipment, crew sizes, field installation production man
hour rates, bulk and engineered material requirements, overhead, profit margin,
contingency and risks, (again, with the buy in of upper management) it is he or she who
responsible for providing an estimating audit trail / document / basis of estimate and last
but not least forecasting the final cost of the construction related project(s), of course
again with the blessing of senior management. To successfully perform accurate and
timely front end or hard money estimating activities, it is necessary to be able to access
updated estimating data bases of construction cost information / data (purchased from
third parties, in house or personal historical data), the estimator / cost engineer must
constantly accumulate cost estimating data, annual cost estimating reference books,
vendor pricing / cut sheets, installation catalog(s), and copy / high light / file ad infinitum
all pertinent estimating data and verify return cost data, unit costs and values from
ongoing field operations. Keeping this up to date with current world events such as
9/11/2001 (and the recent worldwide financial crisis) together with the spike in oil prices
above $140+ a barrel is an ongoing challenge, it is prudent to subscribe and read the
ENR / Chemical Engineering / Building and other relevant industry magazine(s) together
with various specialized trade magazines etc, keep copies of cost indexes as they
specifically relate to labor and material costs, keep a file on labor rates, sub-contractor
bids and proposals etc. It is his or her occupation / function to calibrate, adjust, make
recommendations / comments and notes on specific project / construction installation
problems and potential under-runs or over-runs, location factors, scrutinize productivity
profiles, performance hours and return costs from the job-site and file them away for
future use, this is a vital function that must be performed on a constant basis if the cost
data is to be useful to organizations that depend on this data to grow and prosper. Lets
face it capital cost estimating and how it is performed is a very important topic to any
profit or non profit organization, getting the budget right is important, nobody wants to go
back to management and ask for more money, its embarrassing and it could impact your
career prospects. Developments and improvements by software / estimating / consulting
firms in prevailing computer technology / data storage and retrieval systems has resulted
in more than a few of these estimating data sources being put on the market to assist
estimators / cost engineers, they can be purchased on various software formats i.e.
floppy discs, C D ROMs and smart sticks and can be accessed via the internet, also
dial up / direct on line service is currently available. Operating, maintaining and running
this software data and applying it to compute accurate and well-timed front end /
conceptual capital cost estimates is today the distinctive challenge and important job
- 15 -
function of the estimator / cost engineer and an occupation / skill that will expand in the
future (skill and dexterity in the use of computers is a needed proficiency if one is to be
employed as a cost estimator). Front End / Conceptual capital cost estimates of
refinery, chemical and manufacturing / process related (PCM) facilities need to be
grounded on real life / historical benchmarks for management to buy into them and
eventually approve them, the following is a listing of engineering deliverables that should
be made available prior the commencing the front end / conceptual estimating effort,
(note some of these early engineering might constitute no more than 2.5% - 5% of the
eventual detailed design effort).
It goes without saying, to have all of this data, together with outline specifications of
major equipment, phone quote pricing of major equipment items, engineered materials
and conceptual quantity take off information available, (foundations, piping lengths,
electrical motor(s) list, and perhaps an instrumentation list etc), this is a lot of data to
absorb, however the estimating effort / endeavor must be completed to support this early
cost estimating (of course there is a cost to procure this front end engineering
documentation, that may have to be included with the CAPEX estimate, the question is
how do we estimate these scope items, how much time do we available (1) should we
produce detailed take-offs of the foundations and piping systems etc, or should we (2)
estimate the bulk accounts by historical ratios, percentages and factors (described in
following sections) remember the more definition (design information) that is available
usually means the estimate is more complete and its accuracy is improved, this is an
important decision that needs to be made in the CAPEX estimating effort. Loosely
defined scope items / construction categories that are often / difficult or challenging to
put your hands around and price out are:
1. Outside Battery Limits: OSBL piping (above and below grade).
2. Outside Battery Limits: OSBL electrical work (ditto).
3. Other work outside the battery limits (Roads, jetties and loading areas
etc).
4. Fencing / Gatehouses / Parking and Lay down areas.
5. Product loading area / tank farm facilities / warehouses.
6. Process support utilities (steam / electricity / WWT facilities).
The reason these are many times difficult to price out is that there is limited information
(design parameters / basic design information) on the scope of these items, these cost
- 16 -
items are typically not started and defined from an engineering point of view until the
heart of the project the ISBL facility is nailed down we need to know the product
specification / production rates of the ISBL unit before we can size out the OSBL utility
needs. Many times these items 1 6 are understated (undervalued in the initial
estimating effort) a lot of times these process supporting components are called the offsites or outside battery limits items (OSBL), the actual process operating unit is as we
know is the inside battery limits i.e. - (ISBL). The (OSBL) scope items can sometimes be
a separate capital cost estimating effort, but usually it is estimated by the individual
estimating the (ISBL) scope of work: The OSBL / Off Sites are loosely described above
1 - 6 and include (ISBL) support systems i.e. power / electrical production / steam
generation and distribution systems / process support utilities and systems (compressed
air, gas, process and cooling water / ponds), storage / tank farm facilities, loading /
shipping / receiving facilities, jetties, wharfs, pumping stations, elevated water storage
tanks, road crossings, etc, the facilities are of course vital for the plant / facilities safe
ongoing operations, by there very support function they are not a part of the specific
processing units manufacturing / chemical reaction production major equipment, these off sites might support two or more (ISBL) operating units, they are necessary
utilities / services needed to ensure the manufacturing plant / facility operates in a safe,
reliable and cost effective way, typically these support systems are some of the last
items to be engineered and estimated / evaluated, (hence the reasoning why they are
difficult to estimate / scope out at the early stages of the project). The OSBL / off-sites
include the scope described above, plus some of the following. Think of them as items
outside the main process, however they are needed to make the main process work
and function safely:
Perimeter roads / tank farms / product storage tanks / pipe track crossings.
Power plants / electrical power generation.
Utility water, gas supplies / plant air.
Process water / cooling ponds.
Sub stations, or supply / steam production by means of oil / gas fired boilers,
potable cooling and process water supply and needs.
Wastewater treatment facilities and sewage plants.
Administrative / control / warehouse / repair & maintenance workshops / support
buildings change rooms / etc.
Parking areas, fenced off lay down / marshalling areas etc.
Raw material receiving etc.
Flares.
Pipe racks etc.
Product shipment buildings, guard houses jobsite security etc.
Jetties and off-site piping / pump houses etc.
Plus other Off Site (OSBL) specific items not described above.
As was mentioned earlier in the normal detailed engineering timeline of a project, these
scope items / elements are many times engineered and defined at the 20% design level
or detailed design mid point of the detailed design / engineering and procurement effort;
and that is the problem for the estimator / cost engineer, definition of these work tasks /
scope items is typically loose i.e. not to well defined (the definition of the project is not
yet focused at this point in the projects life cycle). Many times cost estimators / cost
engineers use a percentage of between 20% and 70% of the defined ISBL process unit
cost to come up with a value for this OSLB / off sites scope of work (not very scientific
- 17 -
to say the least, but the percentage has some validity and when nothing else is
available), then again, many times senior management will consider this as not accurate
enough and requests better definition (and rightfully so, this value could be a significant
part of the projects final cost), i.e. more scope definition (hence more design and
additional engineering costs) to define and scope out this important part of the project.
An estimator needs to review the OSBL scope, is it a complex piece of work, or is it
minor in nature, its the call of the estimator and his or hers management on how to
estimate it.
In Front End Conceptual / Preliminary Estimates, determining and calculating the
commodities (many times referred to as bulk or engineered commodities or bulks)
examples of these items are as follows:
In the early stages of a CAPEX project the above are usually inadequately scoped out
due to the fact that little or no detailed design / engineering (or more importantly the
specification(s) have not yet been fully developed) has been completed (basically the
design team has not thought this scope out yet), bear in mind 5% to 15% of the
engineering scope has been defined at this point, the engineering team is trying to
scope out the big ticket major equipment items (long lead time items), towers,
compressors, heat exchangers, filling lines etc, the big push in the engineering effort is
to get the big ticket items on order. Front end / conceptual capital cost estimating
problems/ challenges usually begin to develop in the take off of the commodities / bulk
materials see above listing of for types of materials, they included the above and
some or all of the following, concrete formwork, rebar, foundations, piping systems, brick
/ block walls, painting, siding, steel platforms, roofing, structural steel supports and the
items mentioned above, the problem in estimating these items (as mentioned above) is
that the scope is not defined and some scope items are missed from the quantity take
off. The cost estimator / cost engineer at this stage of the project must many times use
his or her judgment on how to estimate these items, should we perform detailed / semi
detailed estimate or take-off of these items, should we get quotes from various vendors
for these systems (design / build quotes for specific systems, i.e. a high speed
packaging line, or a specific black box system or component), or should we use the
down and dirty method of coming up with historical allowances to establish a price, time
is the deciding factor in determining the path forward on this approach. Will management
- 18 -
accept factors and allowances or will they insist in a complete take-off. Other questions
that may need to be resolved / estimated include the following:
Under ground rock, how extensive - what type of rock, how should we estimate
this item, unit prices or an allowance?
High water table / Bad ground conditions running sand conditions how will we
keep foundation free of water well point system or another method.
Hot taps (system shut down) will plant remove insulation and drain systems, do
we need special permits.
Tie-ins, yard / utility / service piping do we need to shut down any operating
unit (s) what about plant permits (hot work).
Electrical sub station expansions do we need to contact local utility company?
Removal of hazardous materials were do we remove material to, do we need
documentation do we need to keep records for future audits.
Shut downs at night or on a specific weekend.
Fire water system can we calculate GPM needs or should we just make an
allowance.
Revamp / upgrades do we have current drawings (as-builts).
Cooling towers what are requirements, what type of tower (Concrete or timber).
Waste water treatment facilities is this scoped out, can we get a vendor price.
Roads, gate houses tank farms, tank loading areas and a myriad of other items
that need to be considered and estimated that are unique to that particular
project.
In the marketplace there are currently some excellent cost estimating tools / software
systems and procedures for each estimating phase of a CAPEX project (Conceptual
M2 / Square Foot and Detailed Estimating), which when appropriately used, can create
comprehensive and accurate capital cost estimates and front end tools which are usually
satisfactory and helpful to management for resolution and the CAPEX decision making
process. The downside of some of these systems is the initial cost of buying and
subsequent annual renewals can be very expensive. However it is always good to have
a couple of different cost estimating systems, reliance on a single system is not perhaps
the way to go. Of course it is always good to have a couple of different reference points
to validate the CAPEX estimate; hopefully this publication will satisfy that need in a lot of
cases. Of course it is vital that the cost estimator / cost engineer maintain control
throughout the life cycle of the estimating effort (total reliance blind faith on
computerized CAPEX estimating systems and methods is dangerous to say the least)
the cost estimator needs to know the details that backup the computerized estimating
systems and question any irregularities that show up hopefully this database will assist
and augment in that audit effort, the cost engineer has an important and significant audit
/ oversight responsibility function, it is imperative that a completed cost estimate
encompass an audit trail to support the capital cost estimate of its basis this includes:
- 19 -
Details (quantities, related to civil, mechanical and electrical systems and pricing
basis).
Vendor / Sub Contractor Quotes:
Pricing basis (source of labor rates union non union and material costs):
Reports (soils / boring logs):
PCAs, Environmental impact studies:
Lists of major equipment / instrumentation:
Basis of escalation:
Exclusions from the estimate, estimating assumptions:
- 20 -
- 21 -
17. Describe how costs for civil, concrete, structural steel, buildings,
piping, electrical, instrumentation, insulation, painting,
engineering, construction management and any other significant
accounts were derived and estimated and compiled (Ratio
approach or detailed take-off or based on sub-contractor bids
and vendor quotes).
18. Explain instrumentation scope and control philosophy.
19. Provide details of lead paint removal, asbestos removal,
underground obstructions, hazardous waste, and mold
remediation.
20. Provide cost details of any refurbished equipment.
21. Make available details of expense items (demolition, asbestos
removal and relocations).
22. Make known required tie-ins, and any shut downs that may be
required.
23. Provide details on any required overtime or shift work.
24. Explain general condition Division 1 costs.
25. Be prepared to discussion assumptions made regarding
productivity.
26. Provide details of any allowances and provisional sums.
27. Indicate the anticipated accuracy of the capital cost estimate.
28. Explain how currency fluctuations are estimated, if applicable.
29. Provide details of transportation costs.
30. Provide details of any temporary roads, temporary camps /
accommodation that may be required.
31. Provide details of costs specific to vendor assistance, spare
parts and initial chemicals are estimated.
32. Provide supporting documentation for demolition and any
hazardous material removal.
33. Determine the percentage of pricing that is based upon firm
quotes.
34. Be prepared to discuss QA/QC requirements, NDT, inspection
costs and acceptance provisions.
35. Provide any other project specific details that may be applicable,
such as warranty issues, what is the warranty period 12 months
or two years.
36. Explain insurance and contractors fees.
37. Be prepared to discuss a modular construction application.
38. Explain contingency value that was utilized and method used to
determine indicated amount.
39. Explain the work that the operating group will complete and be
responsible for.
40. Describe any Royalties / Licensor fees contained in the
estimate.
41. Spare parts how is this accounted for, detailed list or an
allowance.
42. Be prepared to discuss any shared saving provisions in the
contract.
43. Explain any initial operating costs such as plant operator
training.
44. Explain costs associated with initial fill / catalyst.
- 22 -
Designing and constructing new process related facilities is a risky undertaking, the
individual preparing these CAPEX capital cost estimates should understand the
ramifications / risks that could influence and impact the final cost of the EPC effort, these
risks include.
- 23 -
All of the many partakers in the efforts of compiling front end engineering studies and
estimating, planning, funding, constructing and successfully starting up a new or revamped building, manufacturing facilities or production unit has many times a different
point of view on CAPEX (capital cost estimating) i.e. how to go about it, this section and
the subsequent sections goes over a proven method for compiling these important
project related documents, by following the steps indicated in the following sections the
reader should be better served to understand and complete these types of cost
estimates. Construction is an important industry employing hundreds of thousands. The
cost of construction has an impact on everyone; the cost of construction is passed on to
consumers via price increases on every product consumers purchase.
Optimization of the construction process especially the CAPEX estimating effort is a winwin situation for everyone, savings can be ploughed back into the economy, providing
new opportunities for companies and individuals. The Engineering, Procurement and
Construction of a new or upgraded building, chemical plant or manufacturing facility
more often than calls for a significant capital expenditure possibly over a two to three
year period prior to any return on investment (ROI). In view of the fact that the
requirement of new capital i.e. CAPEX dollars for the above capital projects is initiated
by market forces / evident demand, the new or re-vamped building, manufacturing
facilities or production unit is planned to comply with the stated goals of the new or revamped building, manufacturing facilities or production unit, that were initially spelled out
by the client. The following table lists some of the major activities that need to be
considered in the CAPEX, i.e. estimating process.
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Activity
New needs or demand, for new product / new
or expanded or re-vamped building,
manufacturing facility or production unit.
Definition of project goals, scope and mission
statement.
Conceptual engineering, planning and Front
End / feasibility study including possible Front
End estimate.
Submittal of Approval of Expenditure AFE.
Package.
Commencement of detailed engineering effort if
project is approved.
(Optional) Possible milestone to compile
CAPEX estimate.
Production of engineering deliverables.
(Optional) Possible milestone to compile
CAPEX estimate.
Start of Procurement effort.
Start of Construction effort.
(Optional) Possible milestone to compile
CAPEX estimate.
Completion of Construction effort.
Start up / handover of completed project.
Close out report.
Collection of historical data for future CAPEX
- 24 -
Estimating Input
Refer to Section 2 and 3 for appropriate
estimating method to be utilized.
estimating / benchmarks.
If we look at the execution of a CAPEX project from the end users standpoint we can
concentrate / shed some light on the responsibilities and normal work effort of the
various players that are required to complete the engineering, procurement an
construction of a CAPEX project.
Facility End Users / Clients have to appreciate that there is no particular best method in
executing a CAPEX project, all methods have pluss and minuss associated with them,
and hopefully some of the information contained in the following sections will shed some
light on the best project approach for the reader of this publication.
Main Categories of Construction:
The construction industry is a hodgepodge of assorted sectors, that all have a common
thread, i.e. see the players listed below: The annual cost expended on these
construction categories in discussed in some of the following sections of this publication.
The CAPEX cost elements for a new or re-vamped building, manufacturing facilities or
production unit will include the costs associated with the effort to create the new or revamped building, manufacturing facilities or production unit, items to be reviewed or
considered include:
- 25 -
A large amount of additional information and data of course needs to collected and
evaluated, from any design or reports that have been previously completed, in most
cases this information can be found / or is discussed in the following sections of this
publication. The following is a summary recap and pointers for compiling accurate Front
End Capital Cost Estimates / Conceptual CAPEX estimating efforts:
Produce an estimate plan, who does what, what are the required deliverables,
when is the information required, perhaps the man-hours that have been
budgeted for the estimating effort needs to be indicated, rather than leaving this
as an open issue.
Develop and use standardized estimating forms and spreadsheets.
Follow the standard practice for compiling a capital cost estimate, review scope,
visit the site (if possible), take photographs, perform take-off calculations, assign
appropriate material, labor and in-direct costs to quantity take-offs and
summarize results for review with senior management.
Ensure that capital cost estimate is fully qualified and documented / described,
including basis of estimate, exclusions, assumptions and the listing of
engineering deliverables that the estimate is based upon.
List alternatives or different case studies or any value engineering concepts that
could positively impact the capital cost estimate.
Conceptual / Front End cost estimating is a excellent business resource / tool, as we all
know many times the scope and timing of capital projects will typically be subject to
change during the projects life cycle, however this resource / tool can be used to explain
or support the decisions and the genesis of the project(s) scope and how it was
developed and possibly modified, the front end / conceptual estimate can be used as the
audit trail of why it was adjusted, it can provide the history of what was originally (scoped
out) and estimated / planned versus what was actually engineered and built, used
correctly the conceptual estimator can benchmark his or hers conceptual estimating
library with the return cost / man-hour data from the completed project and calibrated
there current library for future front end / conceptual activities. Remember that the Cost
Estimator / Cost Engineer is a vital member of the Project management team, his or hers
recommendations and advice can have a major impact on the future of the EPC project.
Some final thoughts related to estimating skills, ethical considerations and basically the
estimating effort specific to consistently producing CAPEX estimates, which were
discussed previously in this section. Forecasting the cost of a CAPEX project(s) both
precisely and in a timely manner of future new or revamped construction projects is
essential to the continued existence of any business (Owner / operating company or
contracting company). Cost estimators and cost engineers furnish this essential skill set
(ability and wherewithal to produce CAPEX cost estimates) and developing data /
information by compiling and transforming the engineering data / deliverables (sketches,
drawings and specifications) into the completed cost estimate, this cost estimate
(document - data source) is a road map of the resources (labor and materials) required
by the project execution team to establish if a proposed project / scope of work (to
formulate a proposal or lump sum bid for a specific project) or if future manufactured
- 26 -
The scope of work: An ill defined scope usually results in a flawed conceptual
estimate, , improving the scope definition effort and place greater emphasis on
the front end definition phase of a project will result in a more defined scope
package.
The quality of the current engineering data: Greater emphasis should be placed
on improving any engineering deliverables that come out of early engineering
studies i.e. FEL-1 and the FEL-2 effort.
A new technology or projects with significant challenges such as large complex
overseas projects should be looked at more closely than standard projects being
constructed in North America or Western Europe.
The skill set of the estimator(s): It is vitally important to utilize experienced
estimators; it is many times counter productive t use greenhorn estimators in a
lead role.
The estimating method used in compiling the estimate and its historical past
performance: The estimating methods should be reviewed on a constant basis
and fine tuned with latest feed back from completed projects to optimize the
estimating output.
The time allowed in compiling the estimate: An estimate plan should be
developed, assigning roles and responsibilities and timing needs.
The issues of how unknown scope, unlisted items, scope growth are recognized
and allowed for in the body of the conceptual estimate.
The required accuracy of the conceptual estimate, related to the owners
requirements for obtaining additional CAPEX funding.
The estimate review process: The project team needs to allow enough time to
perform a line by line estimate review of the estimate basis and pricing
philosophy that was used in compiling the conceptual estimate.
How contingency and risks are captured and incorporated into the conceptual
estimate.
Using some or all of the ideas presented in this section will hopefully improve the
conceptual estimating effort and improve the accuracy of the conceptual estimate output.
- 27 -
SECTION A - 2
CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING FUNDAMENTALS
Estimating Fundamentals: The actions involved in assembling a CAPEX estimate
related to the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) effort. The procedure
includes having the understanding of the different types of CAPEX estimates employed
by individuals employed in the Manufacturing, Chemical and Pharmaceutical sectors of
the construction industry, this included understanding various estimating terms,
estimating methods, quantity takeoff approaches and generally all the steps required to
produce a CAPEX estimate.
Construction professionals all around the world are continually challenged to engineer
(design) procure and construct various process / manufacturing facilities, they are
tasked with constructing under budget and within a specific time limit, and of course the
facility has to work properly and be safe. This database has been produced to provide
construction professionals with a front-end estimating tool that will allow them the ability
to produce more accurate and complete conceptual / front-end estimates in less time.
The activity of Capital Cost Estimating is a significant and important undertaking in the
projects life cycle i.e. Project Management and execution (Engineering, Procurement
and Construction) (EPC effort). All practical efforts must be made in the early stages of
a CAPEX project to accurately estimate the future project; it should be based on the
current and anticipated scope of work of the specific project. The capital cost estimate
(CAPEX) determines the total cost of the project, as the detailed design, procurement
and construction is completed the capital cost estimate can be continually refined at
various major milestone(s) to forecast the cost of the completed facility. Producing
CAPEX estimates and controlling these subsequent budget(s) necessitates a wideranging and coordinated effort, involving various skills the task of CAPEX estimating
requires engineering, procurement, construction and estimating / forecasting input, this
will be described in some detail in this and the following sections of this database.
Owner companies involved in major capital projects / capital expansions refer to there
annual expenditures as CAPEX programs, it goes without saying that the execution and
management of these programs is critical to the future heath and growth of these
organizations. A CAPEX project is the conduit by which the business expands and
establishes new or retains current market share or future penetration, a CAPEX project
or EPC Project (as they are many times referred to) can be described as a unique one
time effort to engineer, procure and construct a manufacturing / process plant / chemical
facility or something similar. What is a capital cost estimate, well to individuals involved
in the big picture EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction effort it is the
following, a shopping list of all the cost items, labor, materials, engineering, field indirects etc, required to meet the requirements of a scope of work statement written or
verbal (drawings, specifications, execution plans, sketches etc,), it is more or less the
capturing / collection of all the necessary work items in order to make the planned facility
work in a safe, cost effective way.
Producing a CAPEX estimate takes a lot more art than science, there is no substitution
for experience. An estimator must exercise significant business savvy / estimating
knowledge in compiling a CAPEX estimate. As more project data / design information is
produced, then generally the overall accuracy of the estimating deliverables / product
increases.
The three keys to successful Project Management are # 1 is it safe, does the facilities
produces what it was planned to produce in a safe and controlled method. # 2 was it
built for the value we estimated and # 3 was it built on time, in accordance with the preestablished schedule. Capital cost estimate(s) can be one of the following three
categories or hybrids of these. The data contained within this particular section
endeavors to touch on items 1 through 3 below, with perhaps more emphasis item # 2.
1. Front End / Order of Magnitude Capital Cost Estimate. (Little or no engineering
has been completed)
2. Preliminary Budget / Funding for execution Capital Cost Estimate. (Perhaps
10%-20% of the engineering has been compiled)
3. Control / Definitive / Bid / Lump Sum Capital Cost Estimate. (Possibly 50% or
more of the detailed design / engineering has been completed)
The initial CAPEX Estimate be it a Blue Sky / Order of Magnitude or a Scale up Capacity
estimate is either the initial pathfoward towards a profitable and sustainable project /
future profitable asset or the initial step towards a potential business failure once a
number is published it is difficult re-visit and modify this number especially in the case
were the Business Unit has used the initial number in there forecasting / economic
models. The following diagram depicts the four basic steps / approach that is common to
all estimating efforts, this four step approach will be described in more detail in this
section and subsequent sections of this publication.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Knowledge of
Scope / Site
Visit
Take-Off
activities
Compiling of
Estimating Data
Summarization
Completion of Estimating
Effort
(Presentation to Management)
Approval of CAPEX Project
Items and questions that need to be asked and considered prior to commencing the
CAPEX estimating effort includes:
Have any Phase One Environmental Site Assessments been completed in the
last 3 5 years.
Who is going to develop a scope of work, (corporate engineering, the estimating
group or a third party engineering firm)?
What type of facility is being considered / being - engineered, procured and
constructed.
Is the project a grassroots facility or is it expansion or upgrade.
What type of estimate is required (level of accuracy) - establish an estimating
plan.
What engineering deliverables need to be produced to match the estimating
requirements? Who is tasked with the production of these engineering
deliverables?
How should the estimate be formatted - structured WBS - COA.
What are the timing and staffing needs to meet the goals of the estimating effort?
Develop the CAPEX cost estimate following the 4-step approach depicted above.
Who will get quotes from vendors, (corporate engineering, the estimating group
or a third party engineering firm)?
Document estimate basis (inclusions and exclusions assumptions) include a
listing of engineering deliverables, with the completed CAPEX estimate.
Consider contingency, currency impact, escalation, E / I programming,
commissioning and any vendor assistance.
Check the estimate math, completeness, quality and accuracy needs.
Present estimate to management for review and eventual approval, after
approval utilize estimate as a control tool to monitor progress of the work.
Owners and contractors have to understand that there is no specific method in executing
a CAPEX project, there are perhaps dozens of methods or ways to execute a project, all
methods have pluss and minuss and risks associated with them, hopefully some of the
data and methods contained in the following sections will help the reader in
understanding these complex issues that need to be considered. Industrial Construction
(refineries, chemical plants, pharmaceutical facilities, power facilities etc,) has unique
features and requirements. Assembling and calibrating the capital cost estimate for
these types of facilities are complicated tasks; the initial sections of this publication
should be a good starting point data source for individuals tasked with this
responsibility. The following sections should provide the various fundamentals and steps
that are required in order to compile a logical and hopefully accurate CAPEX estimate.
As was mentioned previously there is no common denominator when it comes to a
standardized estimating methodology - different countries / different companies /
different industry sector all use different terms / nomenclature for in compiling and
discussing CAPEX estimates, there is no standard name or classification / approach.
Again a lot of the issues related to the basics of CAPEX estimating, CAPEX estimating
fundamentals are discussed in some detail in Section 1, 2 and 3 of this publication.
Construction (i.e. the EPC cycle) is a perilous business, to continue in business and to
remain in the black, organizations need to lessen the inherent risks associated with the
construction industry (labor shortages, price increases, changes in scope, failure to
communicate, disputes, late payments, bad weather and strikes to name but a few are
some of the challenges to be faced) the following is one of the many checklists scattered
throughout this publication that hopefully will mitigate some of these risks.
The (CAPEX) capital cost for the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC)
project(s) comprises of all the activities and expenditures associated with the primary
establishment of the specific building, plant or facility: this will consist of:
Front End Economic studies - consist of owner front-end initial costs including
internal ROI investment studies and a marketing analysis, needs analysis, this
may entail the corporate engineering group compiling various front end case
studies of the proposed future project, the accuracy of these first / blue sky
estimates would be accurate to perhaps +/- 25% - 30%.
Land purchase (if working on a new property) - The real estate purchase or
leasing cost may need to be included with the CAPEX (including any
remediation, site improvements and modifications that may be required):
The Detailed Design Effort: - The Architectural - Engineering (A/E) (EPC) design
effort (production of specifications and design drawings and project deliverables)
including reproduction expenses and travel costs associated with completing the
engineering / architectural scope.
Other items could include contractors fees, bonding; insurance (BAR and
workers compensation) and local state taxes, (VAT on overseas applications),
tariffs and import duties, ocean freight, currency fluctuations specific to the
CAPEX project.
Further items that may need to be considered includes: expense items (relocation or
refurbishment of equipment), demolition work, owner provided equipment / materials,
furniture and fixtures, spare parts, initial chemicals and vendor assistance. The extent of
each of the above cost elements of course is based on the type of facility (i.e. unique
first of its type, needing utilities or an continuing ongoing production facility, that has a
history and has an existing utility infrastructure and spare parts inventory), magnitude or
scale of operation small operating unit or a large operation with 100s of plant
operators, its planned operation and approach i.e. continuous operation or some other
time frame, control philosophy and the actual location of the CAPEX project (s). This
publication is focused on the Front End / Order of Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates,
basically the most difficult Capital Cost Estimate to compile, because of the lack of
information / definition and usually limited time and staffing resources to complete the
estimating effort that is on hand at this point in the EPC project(s) life cycle. The
execution phase of a capital project involves a series of activities and steps covering a
4
What is the 5 - 10 - 15 + year production plan for this facility / and or product
(including product).
Will we need to get any special permits from Local or national Government
agencies?
Is this were future growth for this product will occur, i.e. South E. Asia or South
America
Were should the new facility be built, at an existing company owned facility, on a
new grass roots location, or should we renovate an existing facility to
accommodate this new facility and future product demands.
Are there differing manufacturing processes that can be used, are there cost
differences in the operating costs of these processes?
Will this facility new or add on require new services and utilities.
Should the capital cost estimate include land purchase, any demolition or site
remediation costs?
Will the new facility be given relocation grants, training assistance, tax holidays
and or incentives by the state or country that the new facility will be located?
Should we consider future expansions in this CAPEX cost estimate?
Will we need to train / educate the plant operator?
Will the new plant require state of the art control systems, i.e. Delta V or similar
or can we obtain a competitive advantage by using low cost labor to operate the
plant and minimize costs on the I/C account.
These questions and many more will have to be analyzed, the first activity on the this
Site Selection Procedure / Process is to come up with a Front End Conceptual
Engineering study that perhaps gives 3 or 5 execution options together with a Blue Sky /
Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate with a +/- 25% accuracy, hopefully some of the
benchmarks and data points contained in this publication will assist the reader in moving
forward on this initial estimating requirement and it will be useful in the next cost
estimating stages. CAPEX capital cost estimating completed in a business like manner
is one of the more significant (milestones) activities of the above mention execution
phase. Project specific and accurate cost estimating is the hallmark and central issue for
a CAPEX project success, a (high) overstated estimate could be the reason to cancel a
future profitable EPC project, while a (low) understated CAPEX cost estimate containing
basic errors and one that has missing scope items in contrast can lead to significant cost
overruns, that cause the business unit serious problems, this situation can boomerang
back on the cost estimator / project manager that compiled this estimate.
All CAPEX capital cost estimates a common goal, to provide the path forward for
management action - a go or no-go decision tool, how much will this project cost, what is
the ROI, can we buy this product from a toller, does it make economic sense to build
this proposed facility, should we expand this facility or at another facility, were should we
locate this new manufacturing plant in North America, Europe or in South East Asia,
questions and more questions that need to be resolved, of course the cost estimator can
take a leading position in this decision making process. A CAPEX project (this could be
any of the following), a process plant, a manufacturing / production facility, a resins
plant, a food processing facility, an offshore pipeline, a state of the art - pharmaceutical
facility, a research and development building, an API facility, an Animal testing /
research facility, an alumina smelter, a petroleum refinery, an industrial chemical plant,
or a power plant or the upgrade, revamp of any of these or similar type capital projects,
plus numerous general buildings / facilities such as hospitals, airports, universities,
public buildings and offices etc:
THE CAPITAL ENGINEERING / COST BUDGET PROCESS
ENGINEERING AND CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING
This effort consists of the following tasks that need to be completed:
engineered materials services, labor and bulk materials and in-directs to be furnished
and work to be completed, that matches the projects intent and scope of work. The
CAPEX capital cost estimate must provide sufficient accurate information to establish its
authenticity and it should contain an adequate amount of specific details to permit future
trending activities, together with future ongoing expenditure and progress analysis. The
activity of Capital Cost Estimating is a procedure realized in four basic and important
activities that need to be completed, these activities are as follows; note these four steps
are depicted earlier in this section:
Item
#
Step
Knowledge of Scope /
Site Visit: Familiarization
with SOW.
Summarization: Finalizing
the CAPEX estimate
Description
Reviewing documents and scope issues, becoming
familiar with the goals of the proposed project, visiting the
proposed project location (if time / estimating budget
permits).
Quantifying, collection and grouping the physical
quantities of work, preparing a detailed listing of all
materials, equipment and labor required for the proposed
project, basically the take-off is a shopping list of all the
required scope items / work items that are depicted on the
available drawings or that are described in the scope of
work statement.
Applying the take-off and the data contained and
described. In the scope of work statements with
appropriate cost values man-hour units to the items of
work earlier collected in the take-off phase. Selecting the
value / amount to be charged to the owner / client so as to
completely include all cost elements including
engineering, procurement, construction, productivity,
waste, square foot or M2 units, risk items, contingency
and profit and all other project related cost elements such
as overheads needed to successfully execute the project
and realize a profit, this compiling or formatting effort
could also include assigning the work to a work
breakdown structure.
Compiling and calibrating the capital cost estimate into a
final capital cost estimate or the following bid or proposal
document, includes assigning contingency funds, risk,
profit margin and possibly shared saving.
Project deliverables / documents or reports known as Capital Cost Estimates are the
benchmark / road map against which the project(s) / cost execution / performance on a
specific project is calculated and measured and perhaps used as a future metric or
benchmark. The term capital cost estimating as its description signifies / implies or
suggests is a thought-out / educated approximation of value or worth of a product /
project or activity (cost estimators with ten or more years in this business can focus in on
the main cost drivers in a CAPEX cost estimate and can usually come up with an opinion
whether the cost estimate is accurate or not), a specific method / approach or system for
determining the final cost of a specific product or project. In order to adequately
estimate, compile and assemble an inclusive front end or detailed capital cost estimate
correctly, (as per the four basic activities described above) it is essential that the cost
engineer / cost estimator discernibly comprehend and buy into the previous described
the four step estimating process together with the basic fundamentals of capital cost
estimating methods / techniques described in the previous section(s) A 1 and this
section. The following subsections give a synopsis of these needs / essentials; they
include the following important issues:
1. Understand key cost estimating terms and nomenclature i.e. definitions and common
cost estimating terms.
2. Capital Cost Estimate categories (OOM, preliminary estimates, lump sum bid or
validation type estimate etc), applications and uses.
3. Development of the estimating plan, who, what and when.
4. Comprehend and have a total understanding of the scope of work to be estimated.
5. Develop a listing of all components of a capital cost estimate, which include
materials (bulks), installing labor, major equipment, and detailed engineering specific
costs, construction management, validation services if required.
6. Format the CAPEX estimate to the Operating Companies - clients code of accounts
(C.O.A. / W.B.S.) Breakout estimate into direct and in-direct cost elements be Project
specific (breakout into major E.P.C. categories / scope items)
7. Indirect Cost Elements. (Not part of the final project item, temporary items).
8. Consider and assign overhead costs, contingency, profit and risk Items
9. Value Engineering / Functional Benchmarking.
10. Utilization of capital cost estimate document, management tool, reporting document,
procurement and schedule basis, the bench mark basis and part of closeout
package.
KEY CAPITAL (CAPEX) - COST ESTIMATING / INDUSTRY NOMENCLATURE
The listing below provides a generic description of cost estimating / engineering terms,
while not all-encompassing these are some of the basic terms and nomenclature
encountered in the cost estimating / cost engineering function: Refer to section A -3 for
specific CAPEX estimating methods.
Accuracy:
Acknowledgment:
Addendum:
ACPH:
Allowances:
Alternate:
Amortization:
Ampoule:
API:
A.Q.:
Assets:
Backlog Order:
Bare Cost:
Batch Process:
Battery Limit:
Bid Documents:
Bid Form
Bid Opening:
Bid Price:
Binder:
Bulk material:
Burden:
C & F:
Calibration:
Capital (Budget):
Change Control:
Change in scope:
Change Order:
Claim:
Clean room:
Contingency:
Contract (Types):
Negotiated contract.
A Bonus-Penalty contract.
Concession contracts.
10
Cost of Capital:
Cost Control:
Cost Engineer /
Estimator:
Cost index:
Continuous Process:
Contract Documents:
Cost:
Cost savings:
cGMP s:
D.F.:
Design-Build Process
Design to Cost:
Direct cost:
11
Distributed Costs:
Earnings:
Estimates (Types and
Accuracy):
12
Escalation:
Escalator Clause:
Extra
Fee:
Field Costs:
F.O.T.:
Function:
Fringe Benefits:
General Conditions:
13
Good Manufacturing
Practice:
Gross National
Product G.N.P.:
Home Office Costs
(EPC Firm Costs):
I.T.C.:
Indirect Expense
Invitation to Bid
L & D:
Labor Burden:
Labor Cost(s):
L.P.C.
L.T.T.:
Mark-Up:
Monte Carlo
Technique:
N.C.:
O.B.L.:
Off-sites:
14
OPEX
Overhead Cost:
Pledge:
Price:
Process:
Productivity:
R.F.Q.
Scope of Work:
Secondary Air:
Start-up costs:
Ton / Refrigeration:
Turnkey:
U.S.P.:
WFI:
V.A.T.:
Validation:
Validation
Protocol:
Value Engineering:
Ventilation air:
15
Vivarium
V.N.X.:
Warranty:
WFI:
Worth:
circulated air that has been treated to maintain the desired quality
of air within a designated space.
An area (indoor) for keeping, breeding and raising animals.
Value not exceeding.
Contractors / Manufacturers certification of quality and
performance that many times includes an assurance of
satisfaction.
Water for injection
The minimum overall capital expenditure to complete or perform a
specific activity or function.
As mention previously the OOM / Front End / Conceptual / AFE / Funding / Preliminary /
Semi-detailed And Lump Sum / Hard Money / Tender submission / Turnkey etc, are
perhaps the most widely used capital cost estimating types used for a manufacturing /
process industry facilities, however there is possibly four to ten additional (hybrids) types
that are used throughout the engineering and construction industry on perhaps a less
frequent basis some of these are described in more detail on the following pages:
Additional Types of Capital Cost Estimate / Classifications / Accuracy
(1) Ball Park Estimates / Front End / Order of Magnitude:
Application / Use: Front end feasibility studies / Starting Point Evaluation
Expected Accuracy: range +35%, -25%
Required Data / Deliverables: Engineering complete 0 5%. A preliminary scope
statement: This capital cost estimate type is necessary because there is a
requirement by the business unit for very early, first time / very approximate
estimate for a possible new business opportunity or to upgrade or optimize a
current operating plant. These early CAPEX estimates are typically made using,
ratios - approximate percentage / historical in-house data, ratio type estimates
such as Lang or Wroth, Peters / Timberhaus, Cran, Guthrie, Hand, Miller or
Chilton type published multipliers are good examples of this initial approach,
elements of actual historical past project costs and factoring / exponents for
differences in capacity i.e. various case studies are used to fine tune the cost
estimate, locations (location factor), off sites usually a percentage value,
escalation, spare parts, engineering costs, royalties etc are added as a line item
to the estimate. These initial cost estimates are made by cost engineers /
estimators / project managers most familiar with the process / technology or
facility being considered. A basic scope of work statement is also required and
any relevant engineering data.
(2) Business Evaluation / Pre - Funding Study Estimate / R.O.I. Analysis:
Application / Use: Capital project forecasting; process economics
Expected Accuracy: range +30%, -20%. Required Data: / Deliverables
Engineering complete 5 10%. Preliminary scope of work statement: Major
Equipment list (outline specifications, capacities, materials of construction,
together with perhaps 50% - 70% of the major equipment priced out from at least
one vendor) A plot plan indicating locations of major equipment, P.F.D.s sheets
(main piping runs and materials of construction, piping take-offs, electrical motor
16
list and main electrical equipment listing, approximate line sizes, insulation
requirements M.E. and piping) Preliminary P. &. I. D. s. Preliminary site plan,
including: / Sketches / Photographs. I/C control philosophy, Facilities and
buildings, structures pipe racks (type, size, height) I.S.B.L. Storage, tank farms
(capacities, materials of construction) Support services, off site requirements
(services required, capacity): Royalties, spare parts list, EPC engineering manhours including items mention in (1) above.
(3) Authorization for Funding, sometimes called an (AFE Estimate) /
Preliminary Estimate.
Application / Use: Authorization Request submittal to B.O.D. major scope
changes for approved projects.
Expected Accuracy: range +25%, -15%
Required Data / Deliverables: Engineering complete 10 30%
Scope of work statement with execution approach.
Major Equipment list (specification complete, with budget semi firm proposals /
prices from vendors).
P.C.A.s.
Phase 1 Environmental Site assessments.
Preliminary P. F. D.s.
Preliminary P. & I. D.s 20 50% complete.
Facilities, buildings, structures, pipe racks, layouts / materials of construction.
Major equipment locations and foundation requirements.
I.S.B.L. Tanks / storage needs.
Support services / off site requirements.
Site plan (showing process area, tank farms, and off sites).
Main pipe headers / Pipe bridge locations and tie-in points.
Electrical scope of work / classification together with preliminary motor list.
Instrumentation device list. / Control philosophy.
Electrical area classification.
Insulation, tracing and painting specifications together with line lists.
Royalties, spare parts list, EPC engineering man-hours.
All items previously mention in (1) and (2).
(4) Control Estimate / Detailed Estimates / Hard Money Proposal
Refer to additional data / estimating approaches contained in following sections.
Expected accuracy +5%, -5%. Required Data / Deliverable: Engineering
complete 50% 100% (closer to 100% would provide greater accuracy) Scope of
work statement with execution approach and detailed EPC and start up
Schedule, including items (1), (2) and (3) mention above. Refer to later section
for specific details / approaches on compiling this capital cost estimate. The
following listing of estimating data / types of estimates is recommended by the
American Association of Cost Engineers (A.A.C.E.). The American Association
of Cost Engineers (A.A.C.E.) perhaps the most widely respected authority on
capital cost estimating and cost engineering, has outlined the following most
widely used types / classifications of capital cost estimates. In ever-increasing
order of accuracy, of course it goes without saying that the more advanced the
17
engineering effort is the greater the accuracy of the estimate, the major
categories of capital cost estimates considered by AACE are as follows:
Name
1. Front End OOM Order of
magnitude
2. Budget / AFE (approval
for expenditure)
3. Definitive / Lump Sum /
Fixed Price
Typically Completed
Engineering
0-10%
Accuracy Range
5-20%
-15%, +30%
30-100%
-5%, +15%
-30%, +50%
Contingency %
30 - 40
20 30
15 20
7.5 15
2.5 7.5
Accuracy % +/40 50
20 30
15 20
5 10
0-5
The best solution is to use an average of both methods indicated above to arrive at a
value that meets the readers needs.
Cost Estimators / Engineers typically can utilize the 3 to 6 capital estimating types /
methods that are described below, they can be one of the following or some of the
estimates that were discussed earlier there is no hard and fast rule to this selection /
choice.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
18
(2) Business
Evaluation /
O.O.M.
Estimate
Objective of
Estimate
Initial / Front
End Phase
Assessments
& Economic
Appraisal
Initial / Front
End Phase
Assessments
& Economic
Appraisal
Estimating
Procedure Utilized
Typically
Supported by
Historical Cost
Data Points,
Return Cost
Data for
Comparable
Plants,
Location
Factors and
In -House
Estimates
Supported
by. Initial
Major
Equipment
Lists and
Facility
Operating
Needs,
19
(Hybrid of 2
& 3) F.E. /
Semi
Detailed
Estimate
Preliminary /
Front End
Studies
(For Business
/ Venture
Team).
Verbal /
Phone
Quotations
Supported by.
Initial Major
Equipment
Lists and
Facility
Operating
Needs,
(3) Budget /
AFE
Estimate
(4) Lump
Sum /
Control
Estimate
Project
Definition
Package
completed
EPC Project
Execution
Basis
Semi Firm
Quotations
Based on
Equipment
Lists and
Equipment
Facility
Operating
Needs,
Location
In depth
Estimating
Procedures
with Firm
Quoted Major
Equipment
Costs.
Utilization of
EPC
Contractors
Computerized
Estimating
Systems
Compiled by
Project
Control Group
with support
of a
Purchasing
Agent in
obtaining M.E.
pricing
Location
Factors
Computerize
d Estimating
Systems
Project
Control
Group with
Project.
Engineering.
Support and
Purchasing
Assistance
Estimate
Accuracy Range
-25% +35%
-20% +30%
-/+ 20%
-15% +15%
-5% +5%
Capital Cost
Estimate
Preparation Cost
Estimating &
Engineering man
hours at $65 /
hour (Based on $5
to $25 million
Project)
$5K - $15K
$15K - $40K
$40K-$100K
$100K-$250K
$250K $500K+
75 to 230
M.H. s
150 to 600
M.H. s
600 to 1,500
M.H. s
1,500 to
4,000
M.H. s
Milestones /
Remarks
Compiled with
less than 5%
of the detailed
design
completed
Compiled
with less
than10% of
the detailed
design
completed
Compiled with
less than 15%
of the detailed
design
completed
Compiled with
less than 25%
of the detailed
design
completed
and key major
equipment
items have
been places
on order
20
Location
Factors
Computerized
Estimating
Systems
Project
Control Group
with Project.
Engineering.
Support and
Purchasing
Assistance
Factors
Computerized
Estimating
Systems
In-house
Computerized
estimating
system
Project
Control Group
with Project.
Engineering.
Support and
Purchasing
Assistance
EPC
Contractors /
Detailed
review by
Cost
Engineering
Group
4,000 to
8,000 M.H. s
Typically
compiled
when the
detailed
design and
the
engineering
deliverables
are between
35% and 60%
completed
Scope Definition
Information of
Project (Initial
SOW
statement is
available)
Historical
benchmarks
of completed
facilities
exists
Information of
Project /
Location
Operating
Methods
(Preliminary
SOW
statement is
available)
Historical
benchmarks
of completed
facilities exists
Information of
Project /
Location
Operating
Methods
(Preliminary
SOW
statement is
available)
Preliminary
Plot Plan,
Preliminary
Execution
Plan
Milestone
Schedule
Information of
Project /
Location
Operating
Methods
(Detailed
SOW
statement is
available)
Preliminary
Design
Specifications
100 + Activity
Schedule
Process
Engineering
Deliverables
F E / Initial
Process
Scope of
Work
Document is
Commenced
Initial (P.F.D.
s)
Initial Process
Scope
Document
Preliminary
Process Flow
Diagram
(P.F.D. s)
Preliminary
Process Flow
Diagram
(P.F.D. s)
Preliminary
(P. & I. D. s)
Detailed
Process /
Project Scope
Document
Preliminary
(P.F.D. s)
Preliminary
(P. & I. D. s)
25% to 50%
completed
Major / Process
Equipment
Initial
List / M.E.
Count
Preliminary
List / M.E.
Count / Size
Magnitude /
Operating
Constraints
Preliminary
List / Size
Magnitude /
Operating
Constraints
Verbal / Fax
Telephone
Vendor
Quotes on
key Major
Equipment
items
Semi-Firm
List / Size
Magnitude /
Operating
Constraints
Verbal / Fax
Telephone
Vendor
Quotes on
key Major
Equipment
items /
Sketches /
Layout
Drawings
Major Equip.
Semi Firm
Quotes
Factored
Typically
30% to 70%
of I.S.B.L.
value
Factored
Typically 30%
to 70% of
I.S.B.L. value
Scope out
work items /
Initial Off sites
/ Support
Services Flow
Diagrams
Scope out
work items /
Project Team
needs to
define and
scope out.
21
Information of
Project /
Location
Operating
Methods is
fully scoped
out (Detailed
Execution
Approach and
Approved
SOW
statement is
being utilized)
Detailed
Design /
Procurement /
Construction
effort is well
advanced
Detailed
Process /
Project Scope
Document
Detailed
Engineering
(P. & I. D. s)
signed off or
70%
complete or
better
Definitive /
Firm
List / Size
Magnitude /
Operating
Constraints
Written /
Itemized
Vendor
Quotes on all
Major
Equipment
items. (EPC
effort should
be well
advanced,
approx 50% 70%
complete).
In depth
control
estimate by
EPC
Contractor,
defining all
Project Team
needs to
define and
scope out.
Resolution
Allowances
added to
undefined
scope.
Resolution
Allowances
added to
undefined
scope.
required work
items.
Resolution
Allowance
should not be
required at
this advance
point in the
projects life
cycle.
Detailed
Estimate
Indirect Field
Costs
Factored
Factored
Semi detailed
Semi detailed
Resolution
Allowance to
known scope
of each account /
sometimes known
as undefined
scope allowance.
N/A
Assumed to
be included
in factors
N/A
Assumed to
be included in
factors
5 10%
5 7.5%
Less than 5%
EPC Contractor /
Office Costs
Factored
Factored
Factored /
Semi Detailed
Factored /
Semi Detailed
/ Detailed
Estimate
Detailed
Estimate
Spare Parts / VA /
I-C Programming
Factored
Factored
Factored /
Semi Detailed
Factored /
Semi Detailed
/ Detailed
Estimate
Detailed
Estimate
Factored
Factored
Factored /
Semi Detailed
Factored /
Semi Detailed
/ Detailed
Estimate
Detailed
Estimate
Factored
Factored
Factored /
Semi Detailed
Factored /
Semi Detailed
/ Detailed
Estimate
Detailed
Estimate
25% or
Greater
15 - 25%
10 - 20%
7.5 - 15%
2.5- 7.5%
80%
To
85%
80%
To
85%
80%
To
85%
80%
To
85%
GC / Field
Estimate
Owner Costs
Contingency
Range (Does Not
Include Revamp
Considerations or
Process
Development
Allowance)
Typical Industry
Confidence Range
(using REP) i.e.
Range Estimating
Program
80%
To
85%
22
23
Section A - 3 Page 6 18 for description of seven capital cost estimating methods (A G) and nomenclature and required design deliverables. In reviewing this chart consider
required accuracy of estimate, timing considerations milestones of when estimates
should be prepared, resources needed to establish the scope of work, the management
approval cycle, and funding approval limitations / monetary approval levels and the
experience of the estimating / engineering resources compiling the capital estimate.
Step
Number
Capital Cost
Estimating activity /
Deliverables
A. Blue Sky (refer to
Section A 3 page 7)
Tons or pounds of
product / barrels of oil
Capacity driven factors /
exponents
Ratios
A. Blue Sky
B. Scale Up / Capacity
Estimates SF/ M2 unit
costs.
(Hybrid of A & B)
B. Scale Up / Capacity
Estimates
C. Ratio / Factored
Method
D Some initial F.E. /
Semi-Detailed
Engineering Estimating
activities refer to
Section D-1
C. Ratio / Factored
Method
D. Front End Semi
Detailed Estimate
E. AFE Funding
estimate (Refer to A-3
page 9)
F Control Estimate
G Lump Sum Estimate
Produce any applicable
change orders
Produce any applicable
change orders / reject
or accept any claims
E. AFE Funding
estimate (used as initial
control tool)
F Control Estimate
G Lump Sum Estimate
24
Remarks / Comments
applications.
8
Produce executive
summary type report,
indicating lessons
learned, successs and
problems encountered,
reconciliation of
forecasted and actual
project goals
Note: the above mentioned Capital Estimating Deliverables should contain supporting
backup, basis of estimate, accuracy of the resulting estimate, basis of escalation,
estimating assumptions, exclusions, listing of engineering deliverables the estimate is
based upon and other items that are described in greater detail in Section A - 3. A
CAPEX Estimate / EPC Estimate can never be considered complete without the
approval buy-in of Senior Management (this could mean both engineering and
construction support management as well as the business unit management (the
management that will operate the facility when the project is completed). A cost
estimate to be a useful tool must contain enough detail for management to choose
possible different approaches and of course make sound business decisions, it should
contain: A scope of work statement, a Major Equipment listing with costs (Preliminary /
Budget quotes were possible) a field labor cost allocation / report (indicating total manhours and appropriate dollar values) an detailed engineering / design spreadsheet (total
man-hours by month and appropriate dollar values) a breakout of field in-direct costs
division 1 / preliminaries a major milestone schedule that the capital estimate is based
upon, together with details on how escalation values were established, fees, insurance
costs, currency exchange rates utilized and any other high risk items that need to get
buy in by senior management. To reiterate on what was earlier mentioned, the building
blocks and components of the production of a high-quality capital construction cost
estimate(s) and the education / knowledge requirements / job experiences / credentials
of a successful estimator are, at least 5 years hands on experience in compiling all types
of construction estimates, construction field experience / knowledge of the total
engineering, procurement and construction process cycle, this perhaps is one of the
most important attributes, insight of the construction process, including the construction
procurement cycle, i.e. the INP cycle and engineering and design techniques that are
utilized by the design team, installing / construction methods, capital major equipment
types and construction crew make-ups, bulk and engineered materials, an
understanding of basic economics and knowledge of the proposed project execution
minutiae, detailed knowledge of capital cost estimating techniques and bidding
procedures, an understanding of all current estimating tools, including, rotometers, scale
rules, 3 D CAD drawings, digitizers, lap top computers, to the latest linked computerized
spreadsheets, access database versions or a complex purpose made computerized
estimating project control software package, a roll up your sleeves / take charge"
attitude and aspirations for constant improvement, an open mind to new estimating / cost
control methods, a penchant for collecting historical / actual construction cost data,
together with organizational / filing skills, an understanding of what the purpose of the
capital cost estimate, is it a budget, a study / ROI feasibility evaluation, or is it an update
of an earlier compiled estimate, the gumption to speak up when problem (estimating /
cost trends) are encountered, a flexible work ethic and the ability to work flat out for
extended periods to get the job done. It is an interesting and rewarding job, every project
is different; construction (CAPEX) projects by their very nature are a one-time effort
25
lasting from six months to possibly three years. It is rewarding profession and its a job
were every day is a new challenge.
Developing an Estimate Plan
Many owner companies i.e. corporate engineering departments (and in some cases
EPC & A/E firms) in the last ten years have significantly downsized there estimating
groups, many of these owner organizations now rely on outside EPC, A/E, CM and
specialized consulting firms to take care of there estimating needs and deliverables,
there are pluses and minuses associated with this trend, the owner company can save
overhead costs by not having full time in-house estimating resources, however there are
distinct minuses in not having dedicated estimating professionals available when they
are needed, plus in-house estimating data usually fails to be incorporated into these
third party estimating deliverables. The purpose of the following list is to make sure that
no scope of work item is overlooked in the estimating effort, the list however is not all
encompassing, the objective to make sure a cost is assigned to each line item in the
cost estimate and to ensure the scope of work is capture within the current estimate.
26
27
28
When the above checklist is completed the compiled / completed estimate can serve as
the baseline cost budget for tracking scope changes or until the next estimate is
completed (when additional engineering / design work has been completed).
The construction each year of industrial facilities i.e. (chemical and manufacturing
facilities) is a major undertaking, employing, thousands of companies and millions of
individuals around the world. The cost of construction has an influence on just about
everyone; the cost of the completed construction project is passed on to consumers via
price increases on just about every product, so any time we can contain costs it is a
good situation for people. This section discusses some capital cost estimating
fundamentals, it goes into how to optimization of the construction process especially the
CAPEX estimating effort, it touches on the needs or demand, for new products together
with methods on going about producing various levels of CAPEX estimates, refer to this
Section 2 and 3 for appropriate estimating methods to be utilized in producing CAPEX
estimates. The Engineering, Procurement and Construction of a new or upgraded
building, chemical plant or manufacturing facility requires a substantial capital
investment expenditure possibly over a period of three years period prior to any return
on investment (ROI) being realized, this section and the following sections has been
written to provide some guidance in producing these important project deliverables. The
construction industry is a mixture of assorted sectors, that all have a common thread,
i.e. see the players listed previously in Section 1 and in later sections of this publication.
A large amount of information and data needs to generated, collected and evaluated in
the production of a CAPEX estimate, from any design or reports that have been
previously completed, in most cases this information can be found / or is discussed in
the following sections of this publication. Some of these documents include: (A) Scope
of Work / Mission statement / Estimating plan. (B) Process Flow Diagrams, (P.F.D.s).
(C) Front end / preliminary scope of work statements (execution approach) (D) Plant /
29
facility location (and location within an existing facility). (E) Preliminary / early major
equipment lists (with budget pricing). (F) Location of any existing utilities / existing tank
farms. (G) A major milestone schedule (start and completion date) (H) Applicable
sketches / notes / photographs / videos etc. (I) Preliminary P. & I. D. s and or process
flow sheets / block diagrams and any other relevant data that will help support or add
accuracy the estimating effort. Again a lot of the issues related to the basic of CAPEX
estimating effort, the CAPEX estimating fundamentals are discussed in some detail in
Section 1, 2 and 3 of this publication. Optimization of the construction process especially
the CAPEX estimating effort is a win-win situation for everyone, savings can be
ploughed back into the economy, providing new opportunities for companies and
individuals. The Engineering, Procurement and Construction of a new or upgraded
building, chemical plant or manufacturing facility more often than calls for a significant
capital expenditure possibly over a two to three year period prior to any return on
investment (ROI). In view of the fact that the requirement of new capital i.e. CAPEX
dollars for the above capital projects is initiated by market forces / evident demand, the
new or re-vamped building, manufacturing facilities or production unit is planned to
comply with the stated goals of the new or re-vamped building, manufacturing facilities
or production unit, that were initially spelled out by the client. A large amount of
additional information and data of course needs to collect and evaluated, some of this
data is contained in the following sections of this publication.
30
SECTION A - 3
CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING METHODS
Estimating Methods: Basically this boils down to understanding the two basic types of CAPEX
estimates: (1) Front End / Conceptual estimates not having specific engineering deliverables
(details) to support it: and (2) Detailed / Lump Sum CAPEX estimates that are based on specific
details i.e. 100s of drawings and specifications:
Owners, A/E, EPC, CM firms and contractors when they generate their project Front End /
Conceptual and Detailed / Lump Sum estimates use many different formats and configurations (i.e.
estimating templates and summaries), there seems to be no standard approach in industry, this
initially can cause some problems to individuals charged with the responsibility of reviewing and
checking these estimating deliverables and was one of the drivers for the production of this
database, we have endeavored to standardize some of these Front End / Conceptual and Detailed /
Lump Sum estimating summaries in this particular section. The underlying principles of this section
is to outline a number of different approaches and methodologies related to estimating the cost of
Process / Manufacturing type facilities, this section contains ten historical estimating benchmarks
(based on return cost data records) together with numerous single point metrics that hopefully will
assist the reader in future estimating and auditing activities. The number one basic principle of
Project Management and its sub elements i.e. Project Control Cost Estimating is to deliver the
best technical and business solution to the business unit considering or building a new facility
expansion(s) or upgrade(s), together with value (which of course is part of the business solution) for
future CAPEX investments, the project team must deliver the correct business solution at the front
end stage(s) of CAPEX project, the scope, needs to be to some extent reasonably defined, some
front end design work needs to have been completed, various manufacturing / production schemes
need to have been considered and scoped out. The decision to engineer / procure and construct
(EPC) a new Chemical / Manufacturing Facility, or to upgrade, revamp or modernize an existing
facility is many times based on future business growth, maintaining market share and to ultimately
to generate and increase profits. Chemical / Manufacturing Facilities must be designed to meet the
goals of (1) Safety, (2) Quality of final product and (3) Profit Return on Investment. A substantial
capital investment is necessary for any new or upgraded Chemical / Manufacturing Facility.
Compiling the required funding documentation, management approval procedures, and the
approval for expenditure (AFE) is a key project related milestone, one in which the estimating effort
is crucial. Engineers, Architects and Estimators - (All construction professionals that get mixed up
with estimating and budgeting) involved in the engineering / procurement and construction (EPC)
Chemical / Manufacturing Facilities should were possible collect and maintain a personal
construction cost database of completed projects lets call it a personal construction cost library
(magazines, articles, historical cost records, technical papers, rules of thumb etc,) annual cost
databases should also be purchased to keep the individual abreast of current construction costs
and trends, additionally it makes sense to keep notes on value engineering ideas, different material
applications, alternative construction practices and utility / energy requirements and costs. The
personal construction cost library should be continuously maintained with latest data from a
multitude of sources, i.e. your last project. The personal construction cost library should provide
benchmark data on, construction materials, construction labor, delivery times on complex
production equipment long lead delivery items, labor productivity, engineering / architectural costs
and man-hours, indirect field costs, transport costs, escalation and start-up costs, spare parts costs
plus numerous other line items that need to be evaluated and estimated during the Estimating /
Budgeting effort.
The final review or verdict as to whether or not to proceed forward with the new or revamped
process / chemical facility is to say the least an involved one, the decision process entails many
issues, these issues must be weighed against the current market forces, can we make a decent
return on the capital investment, what is the payback period 5 years or 10 years, how will our
operating costs stack up against our competitors, what is the local and governmental permitting
requirements, does the location that has been selected make sense, is there existing utilities close
to our plant, will we have to build roads and other related utilities to support this new facility, are we
trying to beat a competitor to the marketplace. What are the main drivers (business goals) that need
to be realized, some of the questions that must be answered by the EPC Management Team /
Business Unit Operations team are as follows:
1.
How much capital will be required / what is life cycle costs needed to complete this project.
(This includes all engineering, procurement and construction related costs)
Plant operating life cycle, i.e. the number of years or some other period that the plant
operate to ensure recovery of the investment.
What are the estimated operating costs (who compiles this input data), is it needed prior to
the completion of the Front End / Conceptual Estimate.
What are the ROI / EBITDA on the capital expenditure, how many years will it take to
achieve payback on the capital expenditure.
Are there other technical manufacturing solutions that can be used / evaluated to improve
the ROI / capital outlay, tolling, value engineering and or risk management?
Is this plant located in the best location to provide maximum Return on Investment; is it
close to future markets?
What codes / standards / specifications current and future will be used in the design of the
facility, metric, imperial, CSI Company or engineering firms specifications?
What are the permit needs - timing, local / national / environmental.
What is the timing / milestone to be achieved, normal schedule or fast track, are there any
unique situations such as modular construction or toxic materials that needs to be
considered.
Any financial incentives / tax breaks tax holidays, training costs, offered by country or state
government.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
The CAPEX capital cost estimate to be useful project control tool needs to reflect the current scope
of work, if the scope is not defined to well a resolution factor needs to be applied to the known
scope to put meat on the bones, the CAPEX estimate needs to take account of the partial or
completed design deliverables (current drawings and specifications even though some of these
drawings maybe less than 50% complete), latest schedule (completion date), and the execution
strategy (procurement buy-out - contracting approach) in order to set up a realistic capital cost
baseline, that can be used as a project control tool to monitor future changes in design and
operating philosophy. In the last 5-10 years there has been an industry wide trend to move away
from single point (an single estimator(s) or group of estimators working as a single point of contact
producing the final estimate) we are now seeing a more of a team approach in compiling a capital
cost estimate(s), there are real benefits to this approach:
The CAPEX estimate can be produced usually in a shorter time frame; the correct scope of
work is captured and known sooner.
Mistakes can be picked and resolved much sooner.
The specialist engineers / designers can focus on there discipline, i.e. civil, piping to
produce quantities and take-offs.
The design team can assist in the estimating effort, (obtaining bulk material pricing, vendor
quotes and bids, ensuring there is a quality control and accuracy associated with the
auditing function being utilized during the capital cost estimating effort).
The estimate can be broken out by WBS / COA, via the work effort of the specialist
engineers / designers for future bid packages and additionally used as procurement / buy
out tool.
The capital cost estimate can / should be used as a project control tool to track and monitor
the project expenditures, changes in scope of course need to be considered they can be
scoped out early and the cost benefits or penalties can be considered.
Prior to commencing any capital cost estimating activities, the Business Unit / Operating Unit would
have completed a Business Economic Analysis; this would include such items / activities as:
A. Market Research / Sales Volume
B. Return on Investment (ROI) / EBITDA
C. Selling Price / Cash Flow analysis / Payback Period
D. Operating Costs / Energy Costs / Capitalized Spare parts
E. Raw materials cost / Investment Costs / Depreciation Rates
F. Investment Incentives / Tax Holidays / Maintenance costs / Operator training
G. Leasing / Tolling / Third Party Manufacturing
The Cost Estimator / Engineer if he or she works for on Owner Company may sometimes get
involved in estimating some of the above cost related items.
The flow chart below depicts the analysis / business cycle that most Owner companies follow to
determine which capital projects should be pursued and rejected.
Business Analysis
Items A G
(above)
Scope of Work
Development
Front End /
Conceptual Estimating
+/- 30%
Proceed
(Yes or no)
Continue with study if
companies ROI investment
criteria is achieved produced
more defined scope and +/20% Estimate
The EPC Management team sometime know as (1) task force or (2) core team is established
typically the task force / core team members come out of the ranks of the operating company and
possibly key members of the selected EPCM contractor, these individuals must understand and be
involved in the questions posed above and the answers coming out of the above analysis and
assist with the next steps in the projects path forward, in order to proceed to project approval, they
have significant responsibility in optimizing the capital effectiveness of the project i.e. (optimizing
the bottom line cost of the project). The EPC Project Management team must know what the
CAPEX projects final cost is projected to be and the construction / commissioning completion date
i.e. the date the project will be handed over and accepted by the operating group. The effort of
producing a conceptual / front-end estimate is one of the first actions that are made to ascertain if
the proposed CAPEX project is a viable enterprise / opportunity for the business. The conceptual /
front-end estimate perhaps a (+/-40%) project budget, this early estimate is of course is predicated
on an early front end scope of work statement and typically a number of specific key milestones that
need to be achieved, this project budget can be used as a what if tool to determine:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The process industry i.e. chemical / refinery / manufacturing industries has historically used these
early front end CAPEX estimates to make there business / investment decisions, they have a wide
application in both North America, Europe and around the world, they are used primarily as a
selection tool in shaping and deciding were future (CAPEX) capital funds should be assigned and to
that point it is in the businesses / owner interest to make sure these conceptual / front-end
estimates are as complete and accurate as they can be, even though a reasonable amount of front
end engineering expenditure needs to be made.
Additional cost related topics that may need discussed and made part of the initial CAPEX estimate
include some or all of the following:
What is a scope document? It basically verifies the CAPEX projects charter, it focuses in on (1)
what, (2) were and (3) when. Scope is the term used to describe the extent or boundaries of a
project (consider it as a dotted line around the project). Scope definition entails describing the major
project components / deliverables into a listing of manageable work activities or tasks. The scope of
work (SOW) statement (project baseline) is a critical document it defines in specific language the
services of work to be performed and the activities to be performed. The cost and schedule could
and does many times experience problems and issues, if the SOW is inconsistent or does not fully
reflect the work to be performed, it is therefore critical to the wellbeing of the CAPEX project that the
SOW is correct and all changes are incorporated in the latest SOW statement and is communicated
to the project team members. The Project Scope of Work: is essentially determining:
1. The location(s) of the proposed CAPEX project.
2. The CAPEX project(s) schedule, from funding approval to start of production, list out of key
Engineering, Procurement, Construction and handover milestones that need to be
accomplish.
3. The Engineering, Procurement and Construction approach and contracting strategy.
4. A listing of project restraints / challenges i.e. permits that are needed, consent decrees
(must be completed by such a date), construction activities in an operating facility.
5. The WBS / COA structure or any enterprise software coding issues needs to be known.
6. Any land acquisition costs or major site improvement issues.
7. Facility capacity / production nameplate, this includes the number of items / pounds kg of
product to be manufactured.
8. The quality specifications and requirements that the product needs to meet.
9. The hourly / daily / weekly / annual production or campaign rate that the facility will produce.
10. The manufacturing operating philosophy i.e. (Batch operation, 8 hours operation or a
Continuous operation).
11. The technology to be utilized, the major equipment (production equipment) and the
manufacturing control / automation philosophy.
12. The required services and utilities required to meet the needs of the CAPEX project.
13. The number of facility operators needed to operate the proposed facility, this maybe optional
in the early scope development phase.
14. The facilities / buildings / support requirements needed for the proposed facility.
15. The offsite requirements, the storage / warehouse needs and unloading and loading
methods, new access roads, rail spur etc.
CAPEX estimating and project planning / scheduling are of course closely allied and of cause this is
why these two activities fall within the Project Control scope of work; neither of these activities can
be adequately realized without contribution (feedback) from the other, manpower requirements,
installation rates, peak manpower needs, worker / facility footprint ratio, worker productivity plus a
bunch of other related topics impinge on each other. It is a given that the job function / role of the
cost estimator / engineer on any future / ongoing CAPEX project is to develop the estimating
documentation basis, i.e. exclusions, inclusions and to appraise and determine all the required
scope items and to forecast the final cost(s) of the CAPEX project(s), in this role he or she needs to
be the eyes and ears of the Senior Management (BOD level individuals) and the EPC management
team supervising the overall Engineering, Procurement and Construction effort, they must accept
and take ownership of the estimate (the buck stops here). Senior Management should be constantly
conscious of the committed and to date costs and any trends to date (on a bi-monthly or monthly
basis) and more importantly the projected total installed cost of the EPC CAPEX project, sometimes
there is some marginal relief of this situation (some owner companies will allow a CAPEX project
to over run by 10% or less without a lot of problems - prior to obtaining additional / supplementary
funds to complete the project, however be aware hell hath no fury like the Board of Directors
wanting to know why a CAPEX project over ran its budget by more than 10%), it is the cost
estimators / engineers function / responsibility to know the current status of there project, they are
responsible for the two of the three main aspects of Project Delivery / Management cost and
schedule. These three key metrics are known in the EPC industry as the Three Legged Stool they
are as follows.
1. Schedule (when is it going to be completed, was the project delivered on schedule).
2. Cost (what will it cost, did the final cost fall with in a -/+ 10% range of the authorized
budget).
3. Quality / Safety (will the facility produce the items / at the required production rate / with in
specification it was designed for in a safe and economic manner).
When all three of these metrics are achieved on a specific EPC CAPEX project, success can be
claimed.
The management and organizational progression within the EPC engineering / construction industry
has been going through major changes in the last decade or two, Project Managers are coming out
of the ranks of Project Controls not out of focused engineering / discipline ranks (just consider how
much we rely on the computer today as compared to 5 or 10 years back). This sea change has
made significant transformation to project management styles, proficiency and reporting systems,
historically the focus had been on the production of the detailed design, now we see a more
rounded approach were the focus is on cost and schedule, this has driven the need for current and
well-founded cost and performance metrics (estimating / performance standards, reports) many
construction professionals have a distinct dislike for this new approach the criticism is that there
are just to many reports. The fact of the matter is that Estimators, Cost Engineers, Project
Managers and other Construction Professionals all around the world across a broad spectrum of
construction sectors are doggedly searching for valid, accurate and easy to use Front End /
Conceptual capital cost estimating methods, systems and benchmarking data, hopefully some of
the following methodologies presented and specific to ratio estimating in this section and the other
conceptual cost estimating methods and data contained within the other sections will assist the
reader in this endeavor. A word of advice on estimating rules of thumb check them out before
using them, there are thousands of these historical units / numbers, benchmarks and factors
floating around in the engineering / construction industry (some are valid and some are just plain
wrong do your homework prior to using and relying on them) numbers that work in North America
may have no relevance in Europe or the far east, the basis of the numbers should be fully
understood prior to relying on them, invalid or erroneous numbers can lead to unrealistic capital
cost estimates and potential over-runs and other personal (career) ramifications buyer beware. It
is the EPC Management team (with significant input from the project controls professional(s),
estimator / cost engineer) task to insure, by timely communications (e-mails, dashboards / weekly,
bi-weekly and monthly reports and updates), that the dialog - cross pollination - communication on
the current and forecasted cost and schedule status takes place with all the team members and that
both the capital cost estimate, project plan and the execution plan are reflective of the current status
of the CAPEX project and are completely updated and fully mirror the current scope of work to be
accomplished and reflects the actual Engineering, Procurement and Construction project
deliverables, methodology and status. In the last five to ten years, there has been a move by
Project Management / Project Control professionals to put great importance on sophisticated
computerized cost estimating systems / project control systems linking cost, schedule,
procurement, field performance, document distribution etc., these systems have some excellent
advantages, they can provide, future benchmarks, current histograms, level 1, 2, 3 and 4
schedules, 30- 90-120 day look ahead schedules, earned value reports, S curves, productivity
performance profiles and much more. The reality is that all the computerized estimating outputs are
only as good as the information that is inputted into the computer, the old saying garbage in
garbage out still applies today. As a result, maintaining and keeping up to date the capital estimate
final cost budget with frequent enhancements, adds and deduction due to change orders / scope
modification / field changes / productivity changes etc. is the primary function of the estimator / cost
engineers on Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) related capital projects. The
unceasing review of numerous actions such as expenditure tracking, change orders, trending
reports, bulk material buy out activities, number of purchase orders placed, commitments, tracking
home office activities (man-hours), tracking engineering and procurement progress, monitoring field
labor costs / productivity measuring, etc. These measures are required to manage, monitor and
control the project and report the final capital cost / expenditure of the project(s) to the EPC Project
Management team. Accurate / timely and rationally compiled complete and precise capital cost
estimates are the life blood of any profit motivated chemical / manufacturing enterprise, these early
and important cost evaluations are the essential decision making tool and metric, on whether to
proceed with a proposed project or not (perhaps the project needs to be stopped because of a
huge potential over run in the final forecasted cost), or to delay the decision to proceed (1) to
another location, (2) until some time in the future three years from now when the economy is in
more of a growth mode, or (3) look for other process / technical / business solutions (look into tolling
activities). Again accurate / timely and comprehensive capital cost estimating of the cost of a
CAPEX project is fundamental and vital to any organization, this skill set give a competitive
advantage both Owners and EPC companies, this is why accurate and timely front end /
conceptual estimating is so important in todays competitive global marketplace.
A capital cost estimate is not over and done with when a project management / engineering review
has approved the CAPEX capital cost estimate. The estimator / cost engineer must all the time
examine / evaluate the capital cost estimate with the project manger / engineer perhaps on a biweekly / monthly basis to ensure the project is remaining within the projects budget, these bi-weekly
/ monthly meeting should be called status meetings / trend meetings, potential change orders /
claims / scope changes etc should be discussed and laid out on the table so the real impact of
these change orders / claims are fully understood by the project team. The production of a Capital
Cost estimate is a team effort, it is not a single individuals work effort, however many times the
cost estimator / engineer (or in the case of a large project perhaps a team of cost estimators /
engineers 4 6) will complete and compile the lions share of the effort, scope definition together
with certain key engineering deliverables i.e. a major equipment list, a plot plan of the proposed
facility, indicating location of major equipment typically are provided by the engineering group, as
we have mentioned before, some time the discipline engineers will assist in the capital cost
estimating effort, compiling take offs and lists of required materials such as piping (including
valves and fittings) and E&I quantities (instrument devices), whoever compiles the total capital cost
estimate they should consider the following topics. (A) Have an enhanced understanding (the big
picture) of EPC project(s) specific to capital cost estimating and how specific scope items / change
orders / scope modifications can impact a capital cost estimate, field experience will be a big plus in
this situation. (B) Utilize adequate estimating expertise i.e. in house expertise, historical data, and
benchmarking metrics and to be able to compile front end / conceptual, preliminary and detailed
estimates when required. (C) Be aware of the relationship of external forces (escalation such as
oil price spikes, terrorism, labor shortages and political events, such as we have witnessed in at
least two South American countries) scope creep / change order control and how this can impact
the final cost of a project. (D) Be capable of gathering relevant and germane project data / scope
items and become adept in reviewing / auditing all types of estimates to establish the level of detail,
completeness and accuracy that reflects the current scope of the proposed project.
CAPEX EPC projects are the means by which a future business plan(s) are built into important /
sustainable / flexible and profitable future operating assets it is basically how companies grow and
prosper successful companies typically build there new plant or add on to there existing plants in
the right locations and they typically dont pay to much for there facilities, i.e. they are not gold
plated they are designed in a safe and cost effective manner, successful capital EPC projects are
deemed successful if they meet the legged stool metric previously referred to, it must be
remembered that the end use of a capital project is to increase product sales, beat competitors to
the market place, to operate the facility at lower unit operating costs and to be flexible and
sustainable for the future growth goals of the owners operating unit (future expansion added
operating units or addition production trains need to be considered- going forward). A capital cost
estimate, to be effective management tool (and a project control tool) for implementation and future
cost management and planning (consider a capital cost estimate as a road map you start out in A
and you need to get to Z), this document and an execution plan are key tools need to get the
project completed, the capital cost estimate should have line by line items (by Company code of
accounts (COA) or work breakdown structure (WBS) were possible) showing major equipment,
freight costs, bulk and engineered materials together with construction labor (man hours) by
discipline i.e. civil, mechanical, piping, E/I, etc including indirect build up such as engineering costs
and man hours, construction management, general conditions and contingency etc. This data is
needed to pragmatically establish, possible long lead major equipment items, extent of bulk
materials, field labor requirements, do we need to establish a concrete batching plant, design
staffing needs, construction management needs, spare part requirements and period / timing /
duration requirements. The EPC project team requires estimating details as early as possible in
the execution phase to plan the purchasing effort (buy out) and execute the project, perhaps by
various work packages. Capital Cost Estimates can be (1) early front end conceptual, (2)
preliminary a decent amount of engineering has been completed, or (3) definitive / lump sum at
least 50% of the required engineering effort has been compiled, these estimating types are of
course reliant on the quality of information provided and the estimating effort required to produce
them. Cost estimating procedures vary from down and dirty relatively quick (and not very accurate)
ratio / percentage factoring to highly developed details oriented computerized capitalized cost
estimating / scheduling systems that can produce substantial amounts of capital cost estimating
and in some situations engineering data, if the above described methods are correctly utilized, they
can generate very precise and detailed capital cost estimates that have a high degree of
creditability and more importantly can forecast the final cost of the CAPEX project.
To drive home a basic point again, it should be kept in mind that there are three basic types of
estimates, (A) Front End Estimate (OOM, preliminary, conceptual etc) perhaps a good amount of
basic process design has been compiled, PFDs, plot plans, we know the number of major
equipment items, we know we need offsite storage, we know we need loading areas, we know we
need a warehouse, however the detailed design has not been completed or it may only be less than
20%. (B) AFE Funding / Preliminary (perhaps a hybrid of A and C, and (C) Detailed Estimates
(Lump sum bids, GMPs, Design / Build etc) are based on a lot more definition, the design
deliverables may be 30% - 60% complete, we have a priced out major equipment list, we have
detailed quantity take-offs, we have plot plans, general arrangement drawings and the P&IDs
could be well advanced. Precise (bearing in mind the level of design work that has been compiled)
and timely capital cost estimating preparation is a very important aspect to successful project
execution and profitable projects. Typically the decision to execute the EPC project cannot proceed
with out management approval of the capital cost estimate. An overstated capital cost estimate
could annul a prospective / attractive money making project while on the other side of the coin, an
understated or inconsistent capital cost estimate can lead to problematical financial implications for
the EPC project and probable substandard future personal evaluations for all members of the EPC
project management team. The crucial requirements of a precise and well defined CAPEX capital
cost estimate, be it (A) Blue Sky / Front end / conceptual, (B) AFE Funding / Preliminary or (C)
Lump Sum / Hard Money / Definitive, are to have or develop a rational and comprehensive scope of
work statement and to use logical estimating method (a ratio approach or a an exhaustive detailed
quantity take-off approach utilizing the four step approach described earlier), together with the
time and resources to complete the assignment, a milestone event schedule and finally an
estimate basis, that documents inclusions, exclusions, assumptions and a complete listing of
drawings and specifications that the capital cost estimate is based upon. A viable scope of work
or mission statement (project brief) must be founded or formulate on front-end engineering studies
or basic production or manufacturing concepts, it should be based on an established design
philosophy that will be implemented, layout concepts / preliminary plot plans etc, to corroborate and
support the capital cost estimate basis.
On multi million dollar CAPEX EPC projects the owner or a consortium of owners may require an
independent cost estimating audit / review that would include a detailed assessment of the
estimating basis and methodology employed in producing the CAPEX estimate, together with the
anticipated accuracy of the CAPEX estimate, typically these audits / reviews are performed usually
by specific independent engineering / construction individuals (industry experts / gurus,
graybeards consultants or third party E / A firms), sometimes if the cost of this third party
estimating review is cost prohibitive and in house experts or seasoned senior project managers
with many years of capital implementation / cost estimating experience and major project / field
execution experience will be called in to complete this effort if it is deemed necessary. The
engineering deliverables and project specific data that is typically required to complete this type of
audit / review effort includes some or all of the following:
Some of the most important features of a reliable capital cost estimating system in order of
importance are as follows: An estimating plan or memo, outlining who provides what and when,
adequate time and resources to get the assignment completed, estimating tools that will be utilized,
relevant cost data publications, procedures and systems, historical return cost data if possible /
man-hour production rates, computerized estimating formats or spreadsheet formats, a roll up your
sleeves / get it done by an individual or a team approach and a levelheaded businesslike / attitude
and relevant engineering and field experience. The development of Front End / Conceptual
Estimating methods and systems can seem to be a overwhelming undertaking to the uninitiated,
nevertheless with the use of the most recent computer applications and sophisticated database
programs the effort can be a lot less challenging than it use to be - before that advent of the
computer age, some of the key items to consider are, (1). CAPEX EPC related data gathering
(close out reports of completed CAPEX EPC projects), (2). CAPEX EPC data review and calibration
and conditioning for future applications (understanding high point and low points and applying
common sense to make the data real separating the odd ball values from a collection of relevant
data and (3) the development of benchmarking metrics from this data for future use in CAPEX
capital cost estimating and analysis of current in-house and external estimating data. The
consistent and attentive approach concerning nailing down the project(s) scope and the timely
completion and fine tuning of a CAPEX estimate is the secrete of success in estimating EPC
projects, developing and defining the project requirements (the shopping list of items to be installed)
is imperative in the early stage of a projects life cycle. Capital cost estimating approaches
(methods of compiling an estimate) are very important, particularly when they are built / based on a
well-maintained databases (usually large owner operating companies and some of the larger EPC
firms maintain large proprietary estimating systems, in recent years we are seeing a movement to
Enterprise Business Systems i.e. SAP, J D Edwards etc) perhaps these systems will develop
modules that produce CAPEX estimates in the future. That being said, they are no substitute for or
replacement for hard work, an ability to drill down to the details, an inquiring mind, a resolve to
optimize the capital cost estimating system (or the project controls system) and knowledge of the
specific EPC project and the stated goals and business objectives. The capital cost estimate
should supply adequate details and data to determine its credibility throughout the projects life cycle
and contain sufficient details to allow cost control, value engineering and progress monitoring.
Listed below A thru, G are some of the main categories of capital cost estimates methods together
with their accuracies.
Capital Cost Estimating Nomenclature / Approaches / Methods
Capital Cost Estimating methods can be grouped into at least seven basic methods or
classifications (possibly more, there are many names / nomenclature / descriptions / types of
estimates used within the engineering / construction industry), these are as follows (the seven
methods shown below relate or correspond to the estimate descriptions on the following pages),
together with the amount of detailed design engineering required to compile the appropriate
estimating method.
(A)
Blue Sky / Order of Magnitude Estimate less than a couple of percent of the
engineering is completed, or perhaps no detailed design work has been
completed.
(B)
10
A.
(C)
Ratio / Factored Method, Some of the more frequently referred to ones include:
Hand Factors, Miller Factors, Cran Factors, Guthrie Factors, Wroth Factors,
Peters & Timmerhaus Factors, Compass Factors, Chilton Factors, Bach Factors
and Lang Factors (to name but a few, research would indicate that there are
possibly 100s of these ratio / factored type estimating techniques in use today)
these estimates are applicable when perhaps 5% or less of engineering is
completed.
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
Lump Sum / Hard Money / GMP - 50% - 100% detailed design completed, major
equipment is perhaps 90% committed, civil work is underway, engineered bulks
are being delivered, construction may be 10% 25% complete.
Typically these classifications and types of capital cost estimates present only blue sky / O.O.M.
(+/- 30% accuracy) costs and are usually needed in the early concept / front end stage of a project
(or design study) they are used as a trigger mechanism or as go /no go managerial assessment
metric (stop the engineering / study - now, this project will not provide the ROI / EBITDA on the
future capital expenditure, i.e. bad economics or on the other side of the coin yes - proceed with
more research / engineering, the initial ROI / EBITDA for this particular capital cost estimate looks
promising). The starting point could be no more than a given production capacity, i.e. tons of
cement produced per day or barrels of oil production per day or year.
B.
Capacity / Exponent Estimates (6/10th rule) Method (+/- 25% - 30% Accuracy)
Front End capital cost estimates can be created by means of utilizing capacity cost ratio exponents
based on existing / historical cost data of (1) company facilities or (2) by reviewing published
industry references. The exponent technique is used to estimate the cost for a new size or volume /
production rate from the actual cost of a comparable operating plant of identified size or capacity.
The correlation has a straightforward exponential mathematical structure:
Required Cost (Cost 2 New Plant) = Cost 1 (C2 / C1) n
Were the following inputs values are as follows?
Known Cost
Cost 1 = identified cost of plant / facility equipment item
Required Cost
Cost 2 = new cost estimate of plant / facility / equipment item
Known Production Rate
C1 = identified plant / facility volume / production rate or
size
New Production Rate
C2 = new plant / facility volume / production rate or size
Cost factor n = exponent / cost capacity factor (typically ranges from .5 to .7)
11
This approach should be utilized for very early / order of magnitude estimates, the resulting CAPEX
estimate could only be considered to be perhaps +/- 25 - 30% accurate. The industry average
(exponent) cost capacity factor (n) has an average value of between 0.4 and 0.8, 0.6 is widely used
value that has been widely used, hence its name the 6/10th factor, there is good amount of
published data on exponents for a significant number of chemical / process plants and major pieces
of equipment, even construction labor costs, piping, structural steel, engineering service costs have
been researched and these values have been published. The off sites estimate is many times
excluded from the 6/10th factor. This procedure is assumed for the same time period and location,
the value / outcome should be calibrated by an appropriate inflation / escalation index, a listing of
these indexes is outlined in the following sections of this publication. This estimating approach is
widely utilized in the Process / Chemical / Manufacturing industries for a good number processes,
plants and major equipment items, however these exponents in a lot of cases fluctuate over a wide
range, so care should be exercised when embarking on this estimating approach. Exponents /
factor values can be found in various published books, a listing of some of these exponents is
detailed later in this book in Section B 2.
C.
This methodology / approach comes up with a total installed cost (T.I.C.) for a plant or facility, it is
compiled a by multiplying the cost of major equipment item, i.e. a compressor, a pump, a tower etc,
by specific multiplier, that is an all-inclusive value, this multiplier includes such items as excavation
and subsequent backfill, concrete, structural steel, pipe, I/E, insulation etc. (i.e., all the bulk material
items and in directs plus detailed design and construction management). The original thought
process and subsequent factors - is thought to be originally researched and compiled by Mr. Hans
Lang (Engineer / Estimator with a major engineering firm in Philadelphia, PA in the USA), in the late
1940s and early 1950s the method is known as the Lang Factor method is widely used in the
Process related industries, Mr. Lang is perhaps on of the early experts on Process / Chemical
plant economics and estimating. There are a number of similar factors produced by other
individuals, these include Hand, Cran, Gallagher, Suarez, Guthrie, Nishimura, Bach, Chilton, Peters
& Timmerhaus, Miller, Wroth and Compass International to name but a few. In view of the fact that
some of these factors were introduce 20 - 40 + years ago many estimators / engineers are skeptical
about using them today, however these factors remain valid today as an early estimating tool, many
engineers, contractors and owners have compiled their own factors / multipliers to replicate their
particular practices and historical data. Note these factors are useful for coming up with very early
order of magnitude estimates, the accuracy of these factors are at best +/- 20 -30 %.
Lang Factors (As per his Chemical Engineering article dated June 1948)
Total Installed Cost (T.I.C.) can be established for (1) Liquids / Fluids, (2) Solids and (3) a hybrid of
(1) and (2) above, namely a Liquids / Solids plant, this includes installation labor, bulk / engineered
materials, major equipment (delivered to site), detailed design, field in directs, construction
management can be estimated from the cost of the delivered cost of major equipment, using one of
the following Lang factors as multipliers. (The values excluding land purchase, demolition,
relocation, refurbishment and off-sites related scope). The multipliers are as follows:
4.74 For liquids / fluid process plants (significant pumps and piping):
3.10 For solid process plants (usually less piping than fluids plants, with a preponderance of
grinders, crushers, material handling equipment) example a cement plant:
3.63 For solid-liquids / fluid process plants (possibly a hybrid of the above two values):
12
Example (cement plant solid processing plant) major equipment d/d to site = $2.25 million
multiplied by 3.10 above = $6.975 million. This value would include all the necessary scope / work
items for a fully operational cement plant excluding the off sites.
An average of Mr. Langs factors would fall in the 3.80 3.90 range
Major Equipment
Blender
Blowers / fans (including motor)
Centrifuges
Columns w / o trays
Compressor, Centrifugal Motor-driven (less motor)
Compressor, Steam turbine (including turbine)
Compressor Reciprocating Steam and gas
Ejectors
Furnaces (Cabin type)
Heat exchangers
Pump, Centrifugal, Motor-driven (less motor)
Pump, Positive displacement (less motor)
Refrigeration (package unit)
Tanks, Process
Tanks, Storage
Multiplier / Factor
2.0
2.5
2.1
4.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.0
4.8
7.0
5.2
2.5
4.1
3.5
Data source / Information reference: Wroth. Cost Estimating Factors / Chemical Engineering
Magazine: circa 1960 data.
Typically Mr. Wroths multipliers fall in the 3.80 4.00 range.
Guthrie Factors (circa 1960) and similar factors produced between 1970 and 2007:
13
Mr. Guthrie was a chief estimator for a large USA based chemical company in the 1960s and 70s
he developed a module conceptual estimating approach that is still valid and widely used today.
Other cost ratio (multipliers) factors that have been available via articles and publications in last
couple of decades include installation factors produced by Miller, Gallagher, Chilton, Nishimura and
Peters & Timmerhaus. Analysis on Guthrie, Miller, Lang, Gallagher, Compass, Chilton and Peters &
Timmerhaus published factor data, using a benchmark of $10 million of assorted major equipment,
i.e., Towers, Heaters, Compressors, Heat Exchangers, etc. delivered to site would indicate that the
average installation multiplier would be 3.80 - 4.10 range for a liquids plants i.e. with a
predominance of pumps, vessels and good amount of interconnecting piping, note this value would
exclude O.S.B.L. scope of work items, such as waste water treatment facilities, cooling towers etc, .
The following seven data / benchmarking values / tables are factored / ratio / percentage estimating
tables based on return cost data, these can be used by the reader on future CAPEX estimating
assignments. These tables indicate a basic methodology for determining and compiling a factored
CAPEX capital cost estimate, the key to obtaining reasonable results with this approach is to obtain
accurate major equipment pricing, from more than one vendor if possible (with written quotes if
possible), these percentage uplifts / percentages should be adjusted for the readers own unique
specific applications, these ratios, multipliers, percentage uplift factors take into account if the
process is applicable with processing fluids (usually needs a lot of piping systems, together with
pumps), solids or a combination of both typically construction equipment (cranes, welding
machines, etc.) is included in both the material percentage and the 10% - 30% field establishment
cost uplift.
The following cost models should give the reader an appreciation of the ratios / percentages
associated with Chemical / Refinery / Manufacturing type facilities:
(1) Typical Ratio Factored Values of a grass roots North American Chemical 75% Fluids and 25 %
Solids Plant, I.S.B.L. only, built on an established / existing site with major utilities available or
needing minimal upgrade to support this new plant, this data is base on three similar $5- $15 million
facilities. Accuracy would be in the +/- 25% range.
Description
Major Equipment M.E. (28 M.E. items. M.E. $1.96M in 2001)
Material
Labor
Total
Ratio
Ratio
Ratio
1.00
0.00
1.00
Freight
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.10
0.12
0.02
0.04
0.06
Foundations
0.04
0.10
0.14
0.07
0.09
0.16
Buildings
0.13
0.11
0.24
Piping Systems
0.22
0.26
0.48
Electrical Systems
0.08
0.11
0.19
Instrumentation / Controls
0.12
0.05
0.17
Insulation / Refractory
0.05
0.06
0.11
Painting
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.07
1.84
0.97
2.81
14
0.03
0.30
0.33
Engineering Support
0.01
0.06
0.07
Owner Eng / CM
0.02
0.09
0.11
CM
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.23
0.14
0.37
0.37
0.74
1.11
Total
2.21
1.71
3.92
Notes: above values exclude O.S.B.L. values, demolition / expense items, future inflation; profit has
been incorporated into each specific line item. To establish a budget value for O.S.B.L. add
between 5% and 70% of the above compiled values, typically the O.S.B.L. value will fall in the 10%
to 25% range. For revamp / upgrade / modernization projects calibrate the above values by the
following.
(2) Average Historical (Multiplier) Factors - Liquid Plants +/- 25% Accuracy (Chemicals / Fluids /
Wet Processs type facilities, high percentage of pumps / piping) Assume Major Equipment cost is
$1.00 million delivered to site the following average percentages should be used as a starting point.
Off sites (O.S.B.L.) are excluded from the following data values.
Ref
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Direct Construction
Costs
Major Equipment
(M.E.)
Freight (used 4%)
Overseas Freight
M.E. Setting
(Millwright work)
Site work / civil
(excavation / roads)
Concrete work
Structural steel
Facilities / Buildings
(including services)
Piping** (includes
hangars & testing)
Electrical
Instrumentation /
Controls
Insulation
Painting
Safety / F P /
Miscellaneous (A)
Total Direct Cost
Typical %
of M.E.
0
% Bulk
Materials
1.00*
% Labor S/C
0.00
Total
Remarks
1.00
2.5 - 5
5-8
0.02
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.04
1-7
0.01
0.05
0.06
3 - 10
0.02
0.03
0.05
8 - 25
15 - 35
0.03
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.13
0.21
Assume $1.00
million
50/50 split
N/A for this
example
Heavy lift cranes
in line 15
Site clearance /
minor demolition
SOG & elevated
Including
platforms
3 - 15
0.03
0.02
0.05
50 - 150
0.40
0.60
1.00
ISBL only
15 - 45
20 - 65
0.09
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.22
0.28
Including tracing
3 - 25
2 - 10
4 - 12
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.05
1.90
1.26
3.16
15
15
16
17
18
19
20
Indirect Project
Costs
Field Establishment
Costs ***
EPC Office H.O.
range 20% - 30%
Construction
Management range
20% -.45% of line 16
Owner Engineering &
CM 5% 15% of line
16 & 17
Total Indirect Costs
Total Cost Multiplier
0.29
0.86
0.21
0.11
1.47
4.63
(A) = Start up costs, initial chemicals, expense items and other minor items.
* 1.00 = Total value of Major Equipment / Assume 25 items (M.E.)
** 50% - 150% is based on using a 60 - 40 split of Carbon Steel and 304-316 SS, this value
could in some situations exceed 150% in circumstances were exotic / expensive piping
materials are utilized, i.e. Glass / Kynar / Teflon lined / Alloy 20 / Nickel, etc., or high percentage
of 304 - 316 SS, etc. is used due to hazardous / highly corrosive chemical applications.
*** Field establishment includes, construction equipment, field offices, field in directs, G.C.s &
S/C trailers, temporary warehouses, Division 1 (Preliminaries) etc. If the proposed project is a
hybrid of a liquids and solids plant, use an average of both plants / facilities.
To establish a budget value for O.S.B.L. add between 5% and 70% of the above compiled values,
typically the O.S.B.L. value will fall in the 10% to 25% range.
For revamp / upgrade / modernization projects calibrate the above values by the following.
(3) Average Historical (Multiplier) Factors - Solids Plants +/- 25% Accuracy (Cement / Powder(s) /
Material Handling type facilities, typically low in piping). Assume Major Equipment cost is $1.00
million delivered to site the following average percentages should be used as a starting point. Off
sites (O.S.B.L.) are excluded from the following data values.
Ref
1
2
3
4
5
6
Direct Construction
Costs
Major Equipment
(M.E.)
Freight (used 4%)
Overseas Freight
M.E. Setting
(Millwright work)
Site work / civil
(excavation / roads)
Concrete work
Typical %
of M.E.
0
% Bulk
Materials
1.00*
% Labor S/C
0.00
Total
Remarks
1.00
2.5 - 5
5-8
0.02
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.04
1-7
0.01
0.05
0.06
3 - 10
0.03
0.04
0.07
10 - 50
0.04
0.12
0.16
Assume $1.00
million
50/50 split
N/A for this
example
Heavy lift cranes
in line 15
Site clearance /
minor demolition
SOG & elevated
16
Structural steel
20 - 50
0.13
0.15
0.28
Facilities / Buildings
(including services)
Piping** (includes
hangars & testing)
Electrical
Instrumentation /
Controls
Insulation
Painting
Safety / F P /
Miscellaneous (A)
Total Direct Cost
Indirect Project
Costs
Field Establishment
Costs ***
EPC Office H.O.
range 20% - 30%
Construction
Management range
20% -.45% of line 16
Owner Engineering &
CM 5% 15% of line
16 & 17
Total Indirect Costs
Total Cost Multiplier
3 - 20
0.03
0.02
0.05
25 - 100
0.25
0.40
0.65
ISBL only
15 - 45
15 - 60
0.09
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.22
0.25
Including tracing
3 - 25
2 - 10
4 - 12
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.05
1.78
1.12
2.90
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
0.25
0.67
0.17
0.08
Including
platforms
1.17
4.07
(A) = Start up costs, initial chemicals, expense items and other minor items.
* 1.00 = Total value of Major Equipment / Assume 25 items (M.E.)
** 25% - 100% is based on using a 60 - 40 split of Carbon Steel and 304-316 SS this value
could in some situations exceed 100% in circumstances were exotic / expensive piping
materials are utilized, i.e. Glass / Kynar / Teflon lined / Alloy 20 / Nickel, etc., or high percentage
of 304 - 316 SS etc is used due to hazardous / highly corrosive chemical applications.
*** Field establishment includes, construction equipment, field offices, field in directs, G.C. s &
S/C trailers, temporary warehouses, Division 1 (Preliminaries) etc. If the proposed project is a
hybrid of a liquids and solids plant, use an average of both plants / facilities.
To establish a budget value for O.S.B.L. add between 5% and 70% of the above compiled
values, typically the O.S.B.L. value will fall in the 10% to 25% range.
For revamp / upgrade / modernization projects calibrate the above values by the following.
Above costs exclude land purchase, currency impact, front end (study) engineering, spare parts,
vendor assistance and off-sites, percentages / multipliers include contingency funds because the
above stated values are based on numerous historical return cost data, were the contingency was
17
expended / incorporated into the capital cost of the completed facility. Engineering, Procurement
Activities and Construction Management costs are included in the indirect costs. EPC Office
includes Engineering and design, procurement, project management / control and required
administration. Owner C.M. is not included in the EPC office percentage.
Note: the factors for piping, electrical and instrumentation work indicated in (2) and (3) above could
be reduced by 20 40% (use 30%) if work is fabricated as modules / pre-assemblies / skid,
structural steel values should be increased by 10 20 % if work is completed as modules / preassemblies / skid (use 15%).
(4) M.E. / Percentage Uplift Cost Model: The following historical data reflects a chemical process
facilities (valued between $3 - $65 million): 8 liquid process and 4 liquid / solid process and 2 solid
process, 3 minor revamp projects are included) constructed in North America in the 1990s the
costs have been calibrated to the mid point of 2006. M.E. / Process Equipment multipliers /
benchmarks, data is based on average direct labor hourly rate $33.50, to establish union all in rate
add 80 90%, for union application. For open shop all in rate add 40 75% uplift. Cost model is
based on 76 # M.E. ISBL items costing $5,354,832, plus 32 # M.E. OSBL items costing $882,657.
Material
Labor
Total
5,354,832
0.00%
5,354,832
Freight
112,034
2.09%
0.00%
112,034
36,745
0.69%
392,564
7.33%
429,309
134,567
2.51%
102,456
1.91%
237,023
210,665
3.93%
332,887
6.22%
543,552
187,097
3.49%
203,599
3.80%
390,696
654,942
12.23%
275,348
5.14%
930,290
1,587,337
29.64%
1,824,484
34.07%
3,411,821
683,457
12.76%
588,244
10.99%
1,271,701
Civil / Concrete
Facilities / Architectural Finishes / Siding
Structural Steel / Miscellaneous platforms
Piping Systems
Electrical Systems
Instrument / Controls
1,315,337
24.56%
356,445
6.66%
1,671,782
198,605
3.71%
161,446
3.01%
360,051
90,643
1.69%
91,022
1.70%
181,665
50,098
10,616,359
0.94%
65,644
1.23%
115,742
98.26%
4,394,139
82.06%
15,010,499
87,698
1.64%
423,477
7.91%
511,175
Consumable supplies
158,688
2.96%
19,769
0.37%
178,457
182,486
3.41%
21,094
0.39%
203,580
402,577
7.52%
163,974
3.06%
566,551
Safety / Training
29,228
0.55%
63,779
1.19%
93,007
63,773
1.19%
346,667
6.47%
410,440
25,399
0.47%
68,621
1.28%
94,020
197,099
3.68%
75,025
1.40%
272,124
Testing Activities
19,987
0.37%
10,995
0.21%
30,982
Site Clean Up
29,766
0.56%
71,987
1.34%
101,753
17,564
0.33%
37,665
0.70%
55,229
297,974
5.56%
0.00%
297,974
1,512,239
28.24%
1,303,053
24.33%
2,815,292
12,128,598
5,697,192
18
17,825,790
2,041,053
11.45% Of D&I
Construction Mgmt
650,641
3.65% Of D&I
55,260
0.31% Of D&I
Travel Costs
276,300
1.55% Of D&I
62,390
0.35% Of D&I
128,346
0.72% Of D&I
383,254
2.15% Of D&I
96,259
0.54% Of D&I
51,695
0.29% Of D&I
258,474
1.45% Of D&I
4,003,672
21,829,462
882,657
Freight
19,234
2.18%
0
0
882,657
7,868
0.89%
38,960
4.41%
46,828
27,564
3.12%
18,564
2.10%
46,128
212,324
19,234
77,760
8.81%
134,564
15.25%
27,860
3.16%
38,664
4.38%
66,524
Piping Systems
88,745
10.05%
93,664
10.61%
182,409
Electrical Systems
40,453
4.58%
36,553
4.14%
77,006
Instrument / Controls
58,894
6.67%
14,640
1.66%
73,534
Paint / Insulation
18,547
2.10%
19,336
2.19%
37,883
15,453
1.75%
16,677
1.89%
32,130
Loading Facilities
362,447
41.06%
79,774
9.04%
442,221
1,627,482
84.38%
491396
55.67%
2,118,878
16,594
1.88%
66,641
7.55%
83,235
Consumable supplies
29,392
3.33%
2,383
0.27%
31,776
26,921
3.05%
2,207
0.25%
29,128
48,899
5.54%
25,156
2.85%
74,055
Safety / Training
3,089
0.35%
7,503
0.85%
10,592
12,092
1.37%
65,758
7.45%
77,850
4,855
0.55%
9,268
1.05%
14,123
19,860
2.25%
10,592
1.20%
30,452
Testing Activities
1,854
0.21%
1,324
0.15%
3,178
Site Clean Up
3,707
0.42%
8,827
1.00%
12,534
11,739
1.33%
14,387
1.63%
26,127
48,723
5.52%
0.00%
227,726
214,044
1,855,208
705,440
48,723
441,770
2,560,648
136739
5.34% Of D&I
Construction Mgmt
82,197
3.21% Of D&I
10,243
0.40% Of D&I
19
Travel Costs
19,205
0.75% Of D&I
11,523
0.45% Of D&I
16,644
0.65% Of D&I
8,450
0.33% Of D&I
12,291
0.48% Of D&I
297,291
2,857,939
24,687,401
2,468,740
10.00%
Of
Total
$27,156,142
Total M.E. multiplier = $27,156,142 divided by $6,237,489 (ISBL & OSBL M.E.) = 4.35
Sales Tax may not be applicable because of sales tax exemption certificate.
Note (1): other items that may need to be considered, expensed costs v s capital costs, demolition,
shutdowns and tie-ins and spare parts.
For revamp / upgrade / modernization projects calibrate the above values by the following.
Minor revamps multiply by 1.05 to1.15
Average revamp projects multiply by 1.15 to 1.25
Major revamps multiply by 1.25 to 1.75 (possibly more for extreme situations)
(5) The following historical return cost data reflects a chemical process facility (liquid / solid
process) built in S.E. USA calibrated to the mid point of 2006.M.E. / Process Equipment multipliers /
benchmarks, data is based on average direct labor hourly rate $36, to establish union all in rate add
80 90%, for union application. For open shop all in rate add 40 75% uplift. Cost model is based
on 86 # M.E. items costing $9,954,000.
$ Millions
$ Millions
Bulk Material
$36/ Hour
3.15% Of M.E.
ME install
0.97%
Demolition
0.00%
Site Works
2.17%
0.097
0.216
3.95%
Total in
$ Millions
$
9.954
0.314
0.393
10,922
0.490
2.03%
0.202
5,625
0.202
2.80%
0.279
7,754
0.495
3.97%
0.395
2.57%
0.256
7,117
0.651
Building structure
9.39%
0.935
8.59%
0.855
23,758
1.790
Pipe
23.09% $
2.298
29.95%
2.981
82,819
5.280
Electrical
11.09% $
1.104
14.12%
1.405
39,040
2.509
20
Instrumentation / Control
16.60% $
1.653
5.68%
0.566
15,718
2.219
Paint
2.26%
0.225
2.65%
0.264
7,326
0.488
Insulation
3.89%
0.387
3.86%
0.384
10,674
0.772
Fire protection
2.06%
0.205
2.16%
0.215
5,981
0.421
2.45%
0.244
3.41%
0.339
9,424
0.583
77.95% $
7.759
81.79%
8.142
226,157
26.167
16.04% Of labor
1.306
1.69% Of labor
0.138
Field establishment
2.46% Of material
0.191
Field establishment
2.57% Of labor
0.209
Consumables
0.87% Of material
0.067
Small tools
0.88% Of material
0.068
Construction equipment
7.67% Of labor
0.624
Construction maintenance
1.45% Of labor
0.118
Material handling
2.23% Of material
0.173
Clean up
1.85% Of labor
0.151
2.17% Of labor
0.177
Vendor assistance
0.89% Of M.E.
0.089
Contractors fee
2.25% Of directs
0.589
I/C programming
0.105
Spare parts
2.18% Of M.E.
Field in directs
Field supervision
Field admin / secretary
0.217
4.222
30.389
Engineering / CM (C)
EPC firm Detailed design
10.23%
3.109
3.109
0.35%
0.106
0.106
0.57%
0.173
0.173
3.85%
1.170
1.170
Owners Engineering
0.45%
0.137
0.137
0.18%
0.055
0.055
1.48%
0.450
0.450
0.33%
0.100
0.100
5.300
5.300
35.689
Engineering / CM (C)
Total Project (A+B+C)
Total Project = $35.689 million divided by Major Equipment = $9.954 million = 3.58 (note: off-sites
not included off-sites were a separate contract valued at $4.70 million)
(6) Refinery / Petro-Chemical Expansion (SRU) USA Gulf Coast (2004 Costs) Constructed on an
established operating site with adequate utilities (needing some upgrading) Costs are based on
final close out report:
Category
$ Million
21
Remarks
17.20
Freight
Setting of M.E. (L&M)
Demolition (L&M)
Site Preparation (L&M)
C/S/A (L&M)
Piping (L&M)
Electrical (L&M)
I/C (L&M)
Insulation (L&M)
Painting (L&M)
Miscellaneous items (F-P, Spare
Parts, V.A. I/C programming (L&M)
Direct Costs
Field Establishment / In Directs
33.5%
Directs + Indirect Costs
Detailed Design ISBL 10.5%
CM ISBL 3.20%
ISBL Cost
OSBL (Tank Farm / Loading
Facilities)
Detailed Design OSBL 7.5%
CM OSBL 2.9%
Total Facility
ME multiplier without OSBL
ME with OSBL
0.41
0.87
0.21
0.84
1.88
8.33
2.95
3.21
1.47
0.44
0.37
38.18
12.79
50.97
5.37
1.63
57.97
6.85
83,900 M.H. s
0.51
0.20
65.53
7,950 M.H. s
3.37
3.81
Excludes: Owner corporate engineering $298,000 and Front End Study $445,000:
Demolition could be an expense item. Refer to previous L & M ratios to determine man-hours and
material splits.
Material
% of M.E.
Labor
% of
M.E.
Total
1,985,200
0.00%
1,985,200
60,549
3.05%
8,933
0.45%
56,578
2.85%
0.00%
60,549
6.35%
134,994
4.25%
140,949
8.65%
313,662
2.95%
113,355
5.47%
439,523
62.65%
1,866,088
11.35%
537,989
8.37%
925,500
126,060
84,371
5
141,942
7.15%
171,720
6
7
8
9
54,792
2.76%
58,563
330,933
16.67%
108,590
622,360
31.35%
1,243,728
312,669
15.75%
225,320
10 Instrument / Controls
759,339
38.25%
166,161
22
53,600
2.70%
3.77%
128,442
11.25%
329,742
74,842
12 Fire Protection / Safety
106,407
5.36%
223,335
155,838
4,649,140
7.85%
134.19%
7.05%
295,795
139,957
2,622,648
82.06%
7,271,788
164,772
30,771
1.55%
134,001
% of
M.E.
6.75%
34,741
1.75%
8,933
0.45%
43,674
44,667
2.25%
7,147
0.36%
51,814
134,001
6.75%
58,563
2.95%
192,564
3,970
0.20%
20,845
1.05%
24,815
45,064
2.27%
108,392
5.46%
153,456
10,919
0.55%
25,212
1.27%
36,131
62,137
3.13%
32,756
1.65%
94,893
5,559
0.28%
5,757
0.29%
11,316
13,896
0.70%
30,771
1.55%
44,667
68,489
3.45%
68,489
3.45%
136,979
454,214
22.88%
500,866
25.23%
955,080
% of M.E.
5,103,354
3,123,514
8,226,867
% of A & B
10.23%
841,609
0.24%
19,744
3.76%
309,330
0.39%
32,085
1.05%
86,382
0.42%
34,553
0.75%
61,702
2.35%
193,331
0.75%
61,702
0.37%
30,439
1.37%
112,708
35 Consultants / Miscellaneous
Costs
Total (D.D.& S) ISBL / OSBL
1,783,585
10,010,452
23
Multiplier M.E. to TIC = 5.04, this includes some off sites work approx $250K direct x 1.35 for indirects and detailed design = $337,500 = $9,672,952 / $1,985,200 = 4.87 items 30, 31, and 34
should also be excluded from 4.87 multiplier:
Note 1. Miscellaneous items are spare parts, initial fill, and some vendor assistance for a total of
$49,800; the off sites included piping utilities, an addition to a tank farm, product loading area and
tie-ins.
Detailed design hours $841,609 / $59.75 average cost per hour = 14,085 hours / 41 M.E. items =
344 hours per M.E. item:
(8) 250 and 500 MW Power Facility (Coal Fired) 2008 Cost Basis:
Description
Site Works
Site clearance / Site Improvement
Demolition
Retention ponds / M.U. Ponds / Piping river intake / dredging
Walkways
Perimeter roads
Railroad spur
Water Vault / Sewage treatment facility
Site fire main
Security fence / gates
Potable water main
Miscellaneous signs / site works items
Sub Total
Buildings / Facilities
Steam Generation Bldg / Stack foundation
Turbine Facility 2 floors 1 mezzanine (150 250 x 50 high)
Operator Changing Rooms / Break Areas /
Warehouse
Control Bldg
Office / Admin Bldg / Cafeteria
W W T Control Room
Coal Handling Bldg / Area
Emergency Generator Bldg (black start)
Chemical treatment Bldg
River Intake Bldg
24
250
MW
500
MW
18.73
0.00
19.83
0.59
5.85
3.51
0.99
3.51
2.14
0.60
0.77
56.52
23.45
0.27
26.72
1.34
7.65
3.96
1.74
5.16
3.38
1.06
0.96
75.69
33.43
19.88
1.04
2.67
0.70
5.91
0.70
2.32
0.98
1.69
0.98
59.66
36.58
1.83
4.92
1.27
7.44
1.27
4.08
1.81
2.97
1.75
% of "A"
% of "A"
13.9%
10.8%
25
0.42
0.56
0.35
0.91
0.98
1.76
0.45
75.76
0.77
1.03
0.63
1.62
1.80
3.21
0.72
133.35
51.25
71.66
8.25
6.71
35.30
12.95
4.13
6.61
20.16
14.64
1.93
3.73
34.69
1.75
1.15
0.66
275.58
407.86
43.43
451.29
89.18
132.35
15.86
12.19
62.29
23.96
7.34
11.94
35.48
26.06
3.51
6.49
60.35
2.57
1.57
1.25
492.39
701.43
82.54
783.97
48.25
7.55
14.56
19.17
89.53
80.58
10.12
23.59
31.84
146.12
540.82
$
2,163
$
1,514
$
2,812
930.10
$
1,860
$
1,302
$
2,418
18.6%
19.0%
67.6%
100.0%
10.6%
70.2%
100.0%
11.8%
10.7%
1.7%
3.2%
4.2%
19.8%
10.3%
1.3%
3.0%
4.1%
18.6%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Category
% of M.E.
Major Equipment A
Freight
3.2%
Major Equipment setting
8.9%
Demolition
1.0%
Site work
3.4%
Civil work (foundations)
12.1%
Structural Steel
12.8%
Piping
7.3%
Insulation / Refractory
1.0%
Electrical
15.5%
Instrumentation / Controls
7.7%
G C / Site Establishment
13.0%
TIC w/o Detailed Design / CM
185.9%
Detailed Design
13.9%
Construction Mgmt
6.1%
TIC - 2007 Cost Basis B in millions of US $
% of TIC
48.6%
1.5%
4.3%
0.5%
1.7%
5.9%
6.2%
3.5%
0.5%
7.5%
3.7%
6.3%
90.3%
6.7%
3.0%
100%
$ Total Cost
269.70
8.55
23.95
2.79
9.30
32.64
34.58
19.59
2.79
41.71
20.77
35.05
501.41
37.49
16.51
555.41
M.E. Multiplier (B / A)
2.05
Notes: The detailed design is low at 6.7%, this is due to the fact that a good amount of the
systems in the major equipment are designed by specific vendors.
Steel mills / steel facilities usually have a M.E. multiplier of 1.75 2.35.
(10) Combined Sewage - Process / Water Conditioning Facility: (2008 Cost Basis)
$ Cost in
Millions
1.111
0.074
6.60%
0.952
0.537
0.068
0.137
0.257
0.117
85.70%
48.30%
6.10%
12.30%
23.10%
10.60%
0.233
0.291
0.578
0.228
0.537
0.429
20.90%
26.10%
52.00%
20.50%
48.30%
38.60%
Category
% of
M.E.
26
Notes
$20,962 per M.E. item
1,390 man-hours
1 # 35 diameter tank
and 2 # 55 x 55 x 30
high vaults
195
260
7 Acres
275 # devices
Painting
Epoxy coating to tanks
Lab / Office Equipment /
Maintenance Equipment
0.079
0.04
7.10%
3.60%
0.053
4.70%
5.719
Preliminaries / General
Conditions - 5.5%
Detailed Design 9.90%
P M / CM 5%
0.672
0.535
0.292
Total
60.50%
48.10%
26.20%
9,570 man-hours
7.218
Excludes: Royalties / Technology Fee. Typical Range 7.5% - 15% of Total Construction
Cost, Demo $211,250, re-routing utilities $43,710
Front End studies, Owner engineering costs of $298,700.
27
(11) Crude Distillation Cabin Oil Heater Re-boiler- Flue Gas Add-on Facility
320 Million BTUs ($177,300 per million BTUs - Typically $160,000 - $185,000)
USA Upper mid West (Ohio)
2009 Cost Basis Total Construction Cost $56,744,404 / 42 M.E. Items = $1,351,057
Merit Shop Construction (Combination of Union & Non Union)
12 month Detailed design (DD) effort, 21 Month Construction effort (Construction started 5 months
into DD)
Construction Category
Qty
U/M
Material
Hours
$ Rate
Labor
Total
9,336,700
Ea
7,210,500
30,314
70.14
2,126,200
Ea
453,000
2,582
70.14
181,090
634,090
Ea
9,038,000
65,441
70.14
4,590,000
13,628,000
Compressor
Ea
345,600
381
70.14
26,740
372,340
Ea
275,500
423
70.14
29,670
305,170
Ea
175,230
250
70.14
17,550
192,780
Ea
54,560
211
70.14
14,790
69,350
Ea
148,100
2,467
70.14
173,050
321,150
Ea
65,720
1,668
70.14
117,000
182,720
Ea
532,600
390
70.14
27,340
559,940
Ea
128,500
1,860
70.14
130,450
258,950
S/T
42
18,427,310
105,986
7,433,880
25,861,190
19,053,839
105,986
7,433,880
26,487,719
AC
384,300
6,470
50.15
324,450
708,750
454,700
626,529
626,529
6,100
LF
246,700
4,148
50.15
208,000
1,695
CY
376,900
7,797
60.14
468,900
845,800
412
Ton
543,980
7,257
70.14
508,990
1,052,970
6,920
LF
2,012,000
22,165
70.14
1,554,640
3,566,640
7,900
LF
122,500
7,340
70.14
514,828
637,328
413,600
6,483
70.14
454,720
868,320
1,020
No
934,370
5,410
70.14
379,450
1,313,820
5,450
LF
536,000
4,588
60.14
275,900
811,900
142
Ton
296,750
4,071
60.14
244,800
541,550
4,710
SF
172,000
2,084
60.14
125,360
297,360
79,900
SF
65,660
1,694
60.14
101,890
167,550
3,350
SF
184,600
3,157
60.14
189,850
374,450
147,800
6,250
60.14
375,900
523,700
50.15
1,930
Ton
65,500
10,261
6,502,660
99,174
SY
67,550
1,740
514,600
580,100
6,242,278
12,744,938
50.15
87,250
154,800
131,800
6,100
270
CY
54,870
1,534
50.15
76,930
27
Ton
48,987
585
70.14
41,040
131,800
1,300
LF
116,980
1,772
50.15
88,880
205,860
Pipe runs & tie ins (Aver 8" diameter - $370 LF)
1,780
LF
246,230
5,881
70.14
412,470
658,700
28
2,680
LF
43,560
2,010
70.14
140,981
184,541
1,320
LF
74,570
1,419
60.14
85,310
159,880
680
SF
23,450
857
60.14
51,550
75,000
Elect runs & tie ins from D sub station ($260 LF)
1,020
LF
79,700
2,642
70.14
185,300
265,000
120,000
1,950
LF
76,890
860
50.15
43,110
800
SF
43,510
423
60.14
25,460
68,970
780
CY
236,780
1,571
70.14
110,220
347,000
1,348,501
2,503,351
15,024,659
41,736,008
1,000,699
1,113,077
21,294
26,669,576
226,454
13,587
73.65
1,000,699
157,000
6,161
60.14
370,500
527,500
147,670
4,744
60.14
285,330
433,000
696,580
1,118
60.14
67,260
763,840
163,000
8,637
37.55
324,330
487,330
375,450
8,637
57.01
492,350
867,800
26,340
264
65.36
17,260
43,600
2,557,729
4,123,769
17,582,388
45,859,777
1,566,040
43,149
Total of D + E
28,235,616
269,603
32,614
110.50
3,603,800
32,614
15,217
101.25
1,540,700
3,150
110.50
348,075
1,460
110.50
161,330
445,800
D. D. / CM Sub Total
6,337,787
570,500
300
Hours
39,600
287,000
165,800
894,800
87,740
1,518,500
238,600
174,300
570,000
4,546,840
56,744,404
Notes
A. Field Labor unskilled rate = $29.85 x 1.68% $50.15 Laborer.
B. Field Labor semi-skilled rates = $35.80 x 1.68% $60.14 Painters / Insulation workers.
C. Field Labor skilled rates = $41.75 x 1.68% $70.14 Millwrights / Pipefitters / Electricians.
68% = Fringes, WCI, FICA, Unemployment Insurance, OH & P.
Contingency / Escalation pro rated and included above.
29
Category
Material
M-H's
Rate
including
Fringes
Labor
% of
M.E.
Total
1,621,00
0
50,778
1,671,77
8
93,570
5.6%
1,621,000
50,778
S/T M.E. A
M.E. setting
Site work /
Excavation
Concrete
Structural Steel
1,671,778
3,200
2,884
31.33
90,370
17,520
49,690
97,720
1,843
2,884
1,518
27.35
28.93
32.75
67,920
133,120
147,440
4.1%
8.0%
8.8%
155,230
4,804
31.88
308,370
18.4%
Pipe
259,360
8,451
Electrical
108,270
2,383
Instrumentation
47,260
1,070
Insulation
29,660
980
Fire protection
15,060
465
Painting
11,830
702
Demolition
11,530
862
OSBL
(Pipe/Electrical)
33,530
1,287
Fence / Road / Stone
45,850
1,512
Construction Total
B
885,710
31,644
In-Directs
Sup 7.75%L
WC Insurance 17.65% of Labor
FICA State Unemployment BAR 16.35% of
Labor
HO support 12.5% of Labor
Temp facilities plus admin / clerk
Small tools / consumables 1.75% of Labor
Scaffolding
Rental of Const equipment
GC profit 8.5% on L &M excl M.E.
S/T In-Directs C
32.85
33.25
33.42
28.85
29.77
28.25
26.47
50,400
83,430
49,720
153,14
0
277,63
0
79,230
35,760
28,260
13,830
19,820
22,820
536,990
187,500
83,020
57,920
28,890
31,650
34,350
32.1%
11.2%
5.0%
3.5%
1.7%
1.9%
2.1%
41,620
41,340
987,37
0
75,150
87,190
1,873,08
0
4.5%
5.2%
32.33
27.35
76,521
174,271
161,435
123,421
87,350
17,280
16,450
39,230
159,212
855,170
4,400,02
8
S/T A+B+C
Other Costs
Detailed design + fee 7.7%
CM 3.7+ fee%
CM Trailer / Services 10 months
Spare Parts
338,802
162,801
12,500
14,500
30
112.0%
19,540
38,760
27,600
614,503
5,014,53
1
Total
Typically major equipment multipliers (to arrive at a total installed cost of the proposed facility, this
multiplier would cover, materials, labor, in-directs, detailed design, construction management) for
power, steel, pharmaceutical, chemical facilities (liquids, solids and a hybrid of both) type facilities
fall into one of the following categories / major equipment (M.E.) multipliers.
TYPE OF PLANT
Chemical - Liquids
Chemical - Liquids /
Solids (Hybrid)
Chemical - Solids
Ethanol Facility (corn /
sugar cane)
Pharmaceutical
Power
Steel
MEDIAN M.E.
Multiplier
5.00
4.50
2.50
2.75
3.75
3.25
5.25
3.75
1.75
2.00
1.50
2.50
3.30
2.00
4.50
4.00
2.50
Low Range: Typically is an open structure, has a high level of carbon steel piping, an
unsophisticated instrumentation / control system, open shop construction workforce and a normal
construction schedule. Solids has a limited amount of piping, the major equipment is usually
material handling, crushers and grinders.
Median Range: Typically is a combination of enclosed / open structure, has an assortment of
carbon steel and stainless steel piping (60% C.S. and the balance S.S. or better), a reasonably
sophisticated instrumentation / control system, open shop or a combination of union construction
workforce and a normal construction schedule.
High Range: Characteristically the major equipment is housed in an enclosed structure / building,
has an assortment of carbon steel and a high content of stainless steel piping (30% C.S. and the
balance 70% S.S. or better), has a state of the art instrumentation / control system TDC 3000 or
equal, open shop or a combination of union construction workforce and a fast track construction
schedule, is a hazardous process, is based on new technology.
Other considerations: (refer to other benchmarks on page 28 33)
(D) Front End Semi-Detailed / Square Foot / Conceptual Estimates (+/- 25% Accuracy)
Front end semi detailed, conceptual, capital cost estimates are usually compiled in the more
advanced stage of the front end / conceptual definition / design development effort or early on in the
process design stages, i.e. 5% - 15% of the detailed design should have been completed (or a front
end design package has been completed). They are typically prepared to formulate the first round
of project viability / economics, ROI, that are used to select one chemical / manufacturing process
over another or to validate earlier economic evaluations / estimates. The front end / semi-detailed
31
method can in some situations be of great assistance as quick / cost effective and reasonably
defined cost forecast, (accuracy is in the +/- 20-15% range) compared to the lump sum / detailed
method described below, the lump sum / detailed method estimating approach takes much more
resources / deliverables to compile, the accuracy may be better say +/-15 -10%, however by
perhaps increasing the contingency value by a couple of percentage points this accuracy differential
could be mitigated. The front end / semi-detailed estimate provides a reasonable cost evaluation at
a much smaller preparation cost and time value, in essence it is based on one premise, the major
equipment price list (delivered to site), it is typically predicated upon major equipment listing, i.e.,
quotes / pricing, hopefully from pre-qualified fabricators / vendors together with preliminary
sketches, major quantity take-offs and material unit prices / unit erection hours. This capital cost
estimating method / approach is the best path forward when a detailed capital cost estimate can
not be compiled without the knowledge and advantage of a reasonable amount of completed
detailed engineering and the costs associated with this effort, a reasonably accurate front end /
semi-detailed estimate, with an accuracy of say -/+ 20% - 15% can be completed with some of the
following engineering deliverables.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
In general the cost estimate must be a reflection of the (1) Scope of Work, (2) Project Execution
Plan (i.e., direct hire, construction packages, GC approach) and (3) The current Milestone
schedule (start and finish date). If the plan of attack is to use multiple construction contractors, the
cost estimate basis and backup supporting documentation must include sufficient details so that the
final anticipated cost can be established with least amount of effort to mirror potential scope
changes. Additional front end / semi-detailed unit prices and various pricing methods can be found
in section D 1.
(E)
These A.F.E. (Approval for Expenditure) funding initial control capital cost estimates are produced
after the project studies / basic process design package is completed or substantially completed,
perhaps 70% complete and the scope of the off-sites has been established or at least initially
scoped out. AFE / Preliminary estimates are typically used to assist in the compilation of detailed
project execution plan, also to finalize the R.O.I. / EBITDA payback economics. Many time
companies use this estimate to get funding from their board of directors, this is the stage in the
projects life cycle to obtain its full approved funding, typically the detailed engineering effort might
32
be considered 10% to 20% complete, an appropriate contingency for this type of capital cost
estimate would be in the 15% 20% range.
(F)
A hybrid of an AFE estimate and a lump sum / definitive estimate, used sometime as a
preliminary control estimate, sometimes used to confirm or validate the AFE funding
estimate; the engineering typically would be at the 20% - 35% level, when this capital cost
estimate is assembled.
(G)
Lump Sum (Control)/ Definitive Estimates / GMP / Hard Money / Tender Submission
(+/- 5% Accuracy or less)
The lump sum / definitive capital cost estimates are typically compiled / arranged when the project
has been comprehensively documented (a good amount of engineering deliverables i.e. drawings
and specifications have been completed), i.e., 50% -75% engineering is defined, including plant
location, actual location of facility within the plant, detailed scope of work, project approach,
specifications, timing, major equipment requirements are known and long lead items may have
been ordered and any off-site requirements are known and engineering on the off-sites is well
advanced, many times construction could have commenced. This approach the lump sum / hard
money / detailed method of capital cost estimating is typically utilized by EPC / engineering firms
and / or contractors, some owner type companies still compile this type of detailed capital cost
estimates. This is vital of course to any firm providing a lump sum bid. This approach is, as its
name means, is very much more labor (engineering, design staff, procurement and project
controls), intensive that the previous mentioned front end approaches described previous. B of Qs,
(Bills of quantity), Major Equipment lists, Instrument lists, bulk material take-off s are typically
made to a large extent from completed drawings and specifications, typically the engineering effort
is in the 50% -70% range, possibly even more advanced. Lump Sum Quotes are obtained on the
major equipment and specific construction work packages from a reasonable number (2 or 3) of
pre-qualified vendors and individual subcontractors. Detailed bulk material lists are compiled and
forwarded to vendors, the estimator / cost engineer will also price these items out to ensure / check
/ verify vendor and sub contractor pricing. The field labor man-hours are evaluated based on
quantity take-off measurements / productivity is evaluated. The EPC home office and field support
engineering / procurement hours are compiled based on the required project deliverables, typically
by each engineering lead engineer. Detailed Engineering and field supervision and field
establishment expenses and other items, such as copies, drawings, telephone expenses, travel
expenses, CAD machines, construction rental equipment, freight, import duties and taxes, safety
requirements, insurance, contingency, management reserve, insurance, vendor assistance, taxes,
permits, testing, freight, import duties / tariffs if required, etc., are all reviewed, estimated, compiled
and priced out and incorporated into the estimate summary.
General Benchmarks: To be reviewed and added to the previous cost models if appropriate:
Ref
Description
Range
Offsites (OSBL)
Fringes (vacations,
holidays, sick days)
Worker Compensation
Insurance
5% - 50% of
Inside Battery
Limits (ISBL)
22% - 30% of
base wage rate
10% - 17.5% of
base wage rate
Cost of
Facility
33
Cost of
Activity
Comments
1.5% of TIC
Inspections / QA-QC
services
Front End Studies /
Scoping study / BOD
Builders all risk insurance
(BAR)
Contractors O/H
(Supporting construction /
field activities)
Profit
9
10
Performance Bond
Procurement activities
11
Engineering support
12
13
14
15
16
5% - 8% of TIC
17
General Conditions /
Preliminaries
Small Tools
18
Consumables
19
Temporary Services
20
Field Supervision
21
1.25 3.5% of
Direct - S/C
Labor
0.75% 1.50%
of Direct - S/C
Labor
2.5 12.5% of
Direct - S/C
Labor
3.0 5.0
5
6
7
0.5 2.5% of
TIC of facility.
0.15% - 0.60%
$1 - $100 +
million
$1 - $100 +
million
4 00% - 15.00%
3.5% - 15%
0.35% - 1.25%
0.50 1.00% of
TIC
0.50 1.00% of
TIC
0.50 1.50% of
TIC
$20 - $40 K
$30 - $60K
$40 - $100K
$20 - $30 K
$30 - $40K
$40 - $60K
$20 - $45 K
$35 - $70K
$45 - $100K
(CSI Division 1 Preliminaries)
Hand tools / typically
valued less than $100
per item Typically $2.50 $4.00 per construction
man-hour
(Gases, welding rods,
grease etc.)
1.5 5% of
Direct - S/C
Labor
Could be 5.0
7.0 for
remote
plants and
facilities
using SS
and exotic
34
metals
22
Construction Equipment
2 7% of Direct
- S/C Labor
0.20 0.40% of
Direct S/C
Labor
2 4% of Total
Installed Cost
of Facility on
CM General
Construction
Projects
23
Protection materials
24
Contractors Fee
25
Vendor Assistance
26
Spare Parts
27
28
29
30
Operator Training
31
32
South America
($70 - $125 /
hour)
33
Europe
($70 - $125 /
hour)
0.50 1.50% of
Major
Equipment
2.5 5.50% of
Major
Equipment,
typically in the
2-4% range on
complex
facilities use 55
7.5% of the
M.E. cost
0.25% - 3.5% of
major
equipment
0 10% of
Direct Labor
10 40% of
Detailed design
costs
0.5 2.5% of
M.E.
North America
($70 - $100 /
hour)
Tarpaulins / temporary
screens / worker rain
gear.
Large projects would
see fee in the 2 3%
range.
On Refinery / Process /
Power type construction
fees can range from 6% 10% of TIC
Another approach is to
obtain pricing from
vendors for this activity
Another approach is
1.5% 7.5% of rotating
equipment (Pumps,
compressors etc)
Another approach is
0.5% 3.5%% of TIC of
facility
Use 5% - 10% of labor
cost if o/t is anticipated
1 5% of TIC
$10 - $15K
per month
(based on
166 m/h
per month)
$10 - $17K
per month
(based on
166 m/h
per month)
$10 - $20K
per month
(based on
166 m/h
per month)
35
Excludes
per diem &
trip home
every 2 - 6
weeks
Excludes
per diem &
trip home
every 8 - 12
weeks
(* Excludes
local
country
income
taxes)
Excludes
per diem &
trip home
every 8 - 12
weeks
(* Excludes
local
country
income
34
Africa, Middle
and Far East
($75 - $135 /
hour)
35
Expense items /
Demolition / initial fill
Chemicals /
36
TBD
Historically
0.50% - 1.50%
of TIC
$300 - $450 Ton
37
38
$12 - $22K
per month
(based on
166 m/h
per month)
Average
Cost $375 /
Ton
Average
Cost $625 /
Ton
Average
Cost $250
- $325 /
Ton of
annual
production
capacity
Average
Cost $2.00
per Gallon
Ethanol Plant
Construction Cost - (Total
Facility based on
production capacity)
$1.60 - $1.75
per gallon for a
25 million
gallon a year
plant.
$1.50 - $1.65
per gallon for a
50 million
gallon a year
plant.
$1.40 - $1.55
per gallon for a
100 million
gallon a year
plant.
40
Bio-Diesel Facility
Construction Cost - (Total
Facility based on
production capacity)
Flax, palm oil, sunflower
and soybean.
Cement Plant
Construction Cost - (Total
Facility based on
production capacity)
Refinery (Oil)
Construction Cost - (Total
Facility based on
production capacity)
$0.90 - $1.40
per gallon
$1.15 per
gallon
Average
Cost $280 /
Ton
$6,750 - $11,250
per BBL
Average
Cost
$9,000 per
BBL
42
39
41
taxes)
Excludes
per diem &
trip home
every 8 - 12
weeks
(* Excludes
local
country
income
taxes)
36
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
Facility cost
per pound / kg
of production
Facility cost
per pound / kg
of production
Facility cost
per pound / kg
of production
$1,475 - $1,875
per MW
$0.27 - $0.30
per kg of
production
$0.06 - $0.09
per kg of
production
$0.13 - $0.15
per kg of
production
Average
Cost $585 /
MW
$850 - $1,650 of
installed MW of
capacity
Average
Cost
$1,250 /
MW
Average
Cost
$1,333 /
MW
Average
50
$890 - $1,775 of
installed MW of
capacity
51
52
Desalination Facility
53
Construction temporary
services (water, electricity
etc)
Cost of CS pipe and
$1,400 - $1,975
of installed MW
of capacity
25 million
gallon per day
of brackish
water $40
$50 million
investment
Ditto sea water
100 million
gallons per day
$110 $125
million
investment
0.65% - 1.40%
of construction
cost.
$2.65 - $3.65
54
37
55
56
60
61
57
58
59
per pound
$5.83 - $8.03
per kg
$0.33 $0.37
per pound
$0.73 - $0.81
per kg
TBD
supports
Determine if sales
exemption certificate is
in place.
TBD
$1,500 $2,500
$800 - $950
0.5 1.75% of
annual sales
Public Building
0.25% 1.0%
Manufacturing Facility
(Auto Production / Paint /
Tire type facility)
3.5% - 7.5%
1.5% 5.5%
1.5% - 5.5%
Pharmaceutical Facility***
(Class 10,000 100,000)
2.5% - 8.5%
62
63
64
Ocean Freight
65
Operator training
66
67
cost $3.15
per pound
and $6.93
3% - 6% of TIC
10% - 25% of
Labor cost
(direct hire plus
S.C labor)
38
68
69
70
Project Insurance
(Umbrella)
71
5% - 10% of
M.E. cost.
0.80% - 1.80%
of M.E. plus
bulk materials.
0.65% - 1.30%
of Construction
costs
0.75% 2.25%
of M.E. plus
bulk materials
* Current US tax allow for the first $82.5K of earnings to be non taxable (6/26/2006), however
working overseas for periods of more than six months will require US expatriates to pay both US
and local country income taxes were applicable.
Capital Cost Estimating Summaries. (Cover Sheet)
The capital cost estimate summary on all types of estimates should contain adequate information to
permit management to evaluate and consider the compiled / established factors and ratios
compared to normal company estimating standards. This summary / information should include
some of the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
39
This detailed listing will greatly assist management in their review process. It is important to have
this information on file, many times capital cost estimates are delayed, cancelled or deemed to
expensive, or the ROI / EBITDA is not considered high enough, many times these estimates are put
aside for a period of time only to needed again, two or three years down the road, using the older /
previous capital cost estimate and calibrating it to todays cost can save a lot of time and resources,
when the CAPEX estimate is needed again. The basis of the bid, i.e., assumptions, clarifications,
exclusions from bid or alternates to proposal, need to be documented and made part of the bid
submission, the physical effort of a detailed capital cost estimate involves many individuals, to be
successful it needs to be a total team effort. There must be a substantial / in depth analysis,
review and checking procedure by senior management and the estimating / proposal team prior to
the estimate / bid being submitted to client / or if the capital cost estimate is to be used as a project
control tool. This method is suitable for EPC contractors (some owner / operating companies will
produce similar type capital cost estimate) bidding process related work on a lump sum / turnkey /
tender submission / GMP basis, it is vital that these activities are completed to minimize any risk
items that have been overlooked or estimated incorrectly. Capital cost estimates can be made at all
stages of a projects life cycle, these include the capital cost estimates previously described earlier
in this section. Owners / Clients and EPC firms have to appreciate that there is no single best
method of completing a CAPEX project, there are possibly dozens of methods or ways to execute a
project, all methods have pluss and minuss associated with them, hopefully some of the
information contained in the following sections will help the reader in understanding these complex
issues. Industrial Construction (refineries, chemical plants, pharmaceutical facilities, power facilities
etc) need to be looked at differently, they all have distinctive scopes of work that are unique to their
market sector. Assembling and calibrating the capital cost estimate for these types of facilities are
complicated tasks; the initial sections of this publication should be a good starting point data
source for individuals tasked with this responsibility. As has been mentioned previously, there is no
common denominator when it comes to a standardized estimating methodology - different countries
/ different companies / different industry sector all use different terms / nomenclature for in
compiling and discussing CAPEX estimates, there is no standard name or classification / approach.
Again a lot of the issues related to the basics of CAPEX estimating, CAPEX estimating
fundamentals are discussed in some detail in Section 1, 2 and 3 of this publication.
40
SECTION A - 4
BASIC BENCHMARKING DATA AND ELEMENTS OF A PROCESS PLANT /
CHEMICAL FACILITY MANUFACTURING PLANT
What is benchmarking and how does it fit into the execution of CAPEX projects:
Benchmarking is basically about making comparisons with other businesss and our
main competitors how they execute CAPEX projects, and then learning from the pluss
and minuss that those comparisons come up with and making changes in the way we
will execute CAPEX projects in the future to gain a competitive advantage.
Benchmarking is the constant measurement of installation methods, man-hour
performance standard / routine(s), product(s), or service compared to those that are
considered best in class: Benchmarking allows a company to recognize specifically
where their performance standards / operations are relative to there competition, it is a
tool that can be used to detect major production and performance disparities both on the
plus side and on the minus side. By recognizing various production failings shortcomings, management can focus on remedies to improve that specific failing
metric. Benchmarking is the continuous process of measuring our performance and
practices against our toughest competitors or those companies recognized as industry
leaders - best in class. Basically it is activity of refining ourselves by learning from the
successes of others and considering our past failures.
This section is focused on basic benchmarking data (man-hour units man-hour units to
install various construction components), graphs and various fundamentals of a process
plant / chemical facility / manufacturing plants, the focus of this section is to drill down
deeper than the ratio and factor estimating methods described in Section A 3, the
reader will find numerous man-hour benchmarks for site works, civil, masonry, concrete
work, structural steel, equipment setting (millwright work), piping, electrical work and an
number of other related metrics that may be useful in compiling or auditing front end
conceptual estimates. The Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) effort
involved in the expansion or creation of a new or revamped CAPEX process (chemical
or manufacturing facility) journeys from initial idea to execution and final handover, the
effort involves most of the following work stages / steps.
Typical Major Equipment that will be utilized on a Process / Manufacturing Facility (This
is a Partial List) are as follows:
Air Dryers, Air Handlers, Agitators, Bag Houses, Bins, Blenders, Blowers, Boilers,
Centrifuges, Classifiers, Coils, Compressors, Condensers, Conveyors, Cooling Towers,
Crushers, Crystallizers, Drums, Dryers, Emulsifiers, Evaporators, Extruders, Fans,
Fluidizers, Filters, Furnaces, Hammer- Mills, Heaters, Hoppers, Incinerators, Jacketed
Vessels, Presses, Pumps, Reactors, Screens, Scrubbers, Separators, Spheres, Tanks,
Towers and Vessels.
Items to consider when estimating these major equipment items include:
1. Obtain (2- 3) vendor prices if possible or determine weight and apply cost per
pound or kg for the first initial Front End / conceptual estimating efforts, use
values obtained in section C-1 for specific man-hours and pricing.
2. For installation man-hours review following data tables (5% - 10% of the ex
works price is a starting point divided by $48 to determine man-hours for
installation cost), this is a very rough method of estimating, but better than
nothing if you have no other details.
3. Material used in the fabrication process type of steel / alloy.
4. Pressure / operating temperature.
5. Welding manual or automatic at fabrication shop or is field welding necessary.
6. Shell plates thickness can be 0.50 2 and more in some situations, the
thickness typically increases in increments of 1/16.
7. Codes can be ASME or API or other.
8. Heads can be flanged, dished, hemispherical or elliptical.
9. Nozzles, internal elements, internal supports, baffles, vessel internals, trays,
manholes, external lifting points, insulation clips, legs and skirts.
10. Steam jackets requirements.
11. Stress relieving requirements.
12. Gaskets, seals and bolts.
13. Inspection NDT X-raying / stamp requirements.
14. Size of major equipment (road, rail or air transportation) to jobsite.
15. Ladders and platforms make sure that these elements are covered in the
estimate.
16. Consider weather protection if item is stored in outside location i.e. lay down
area.
17. Does item need to be broken down for delivery to site.
18. Consider cranes, scaffolding, lay down areas.
19. Estimate the cost of holding down bolts and grouting work.
20. Transportation costs / freight / ocean freight / insurance costs.
21. Delivery time, how long will it take to design, go out for bid, purchase, fabricate
and ship to site, is there any cost fluctuation clauses that could impact the
purchase price, that needs to be added to the purchase price.
22. Do we need to pay any premiums for early delivery?
23. Do we need to estimate any refractory work?
24. Estimate the cost of removing any packing materials.
25. What about vendor assistance.
2
Percentage Value
22.9
21.5
24.3
11.7
13.9
Percentage Range
18 - 27
17 -26
19 - 29
9 - 13
10 - 18
5.7
100.0
4-8
100.0
Note: Typical delivery times associated with the (INP) - Inquire / Negotiate & Purchase of
Major Equipment items, with the recent up tick in the refinery / process related
construction and the recent damage to the Gulf coast region these delivery times could
move out by 4 12 weeks.
Major Equipment Category
Note: The percentages shown above are appropriate to Inside Battery Limits (ISBL
work) Outside Battery Limits (OSBL scope / work) is not included in above values.
Contingency is included in above values. This front-end section of A - 4 will focus on the
major equipment element which as can be seen is in the order of 23% of the cost typical
chemical facility, it can range anywhere from 18% - 27%.
Cost Estimators / Engineers to be successful should be aware of the manufacturing
global competition- big picture, they should have an appreciation of the changes that
are happening in the Process / Manufacturing industries and the impact these changes
are having on costs and schedules, these issues include the following:
Such as material and labor shortages and deliveries of major equipment taking
20% -40% longer due to the demand of these items in China and other S.E.
Asian markets:
Price spikes related to material / commodities demand and shortages (copper,
steel, lumber, plywood, glass products, and oil related products).
CAPEX projects moving to S.E. Asia: (this trend is continuing).
It takes almost 50% - 70% more time to build a manufacturing facility or plant in
S.E. Asia, than it does in the USA, why, productivity, bureaucratic red tape a lack
of basic infrastructure, plus a bunch of other issues that slows the EPC effort
down.
Cost Estimators should become cognizant with the issue and factors and what impact
they will have on projects they are involved with. As has been pointed out before, to be
successful today individuals working for chemical / process related organizations, both
owner and EPC firms, should be able to coalesce a number engineering and basic
business disciplines, this includes the following:
order to play a significant part in the capital cost estimating effort specific to of process /
major equipment the estimator / cost engineer should have an understanding to the
extent and details of the required detail / engineering design and the equipment
selection criteria, they should have more than a basic awareness of some of the above
three categories and following stated issues. Process plants / chemical plants /
manufacturing facilities in the last decade have become much more sophisticated in how
they are operated, with the use of highly complex computerized control systems (PLCs),
together with dedicated control systems such as TDC 3000 and Delta V to name but
two), these systems are growing in there use and application, this trend will continue in
the next couple of decades, historical cost data collected in the 1970s and 1980s is no
longer valid due to this specific situation, i.e. the instrumentation account values have
grown by as much as 40% - 80% due to the use of these control systems. The above
three categories of major equipment are perhaps more often than not fabricated and
constructed out of Carbon Steel (research has indicated that perhaps 40 70% of
Process Equipment / Major Equipment is specified / called out to be Carbon Steel) the
remaining Process Equipment / Major Equipment is made out of various costly types of
exotic metals and special alloys, such as Stainless Steel (304, 316, 304 L or 316 L),
Monel, Aluminum, Inconnel, or Hastaloy to name but a few, as has previously mentioned
these major equipment items usually take weeks or months to procure, engineer /
design, fabricate and deliver / transport to job site for subsequent erection and
installation into the new facility.
Cost items to consider when estimating major equipment installation include: Pick up at
lay down area / temporary weather protection - tarpaulins, clean up of any packing
materials, use of come alongs / chains & pullies, hardcore (hard standings) / temporary
staging areas, aligning and leveling items, i.e. shims, items that may need to be included
or excluded are: labor and material for foundations (concrete and excavation) and
structural steel / brackets, core drilling and grouting of equipment / utility piping systems,
and subsequent final hook up, electrical cable, conduit and hookups, equipment
supports / brackets, H D bolts (anchors), sleeves and jumpers / final balancing and
adjusting finished systems, equipment and piping passivation and cleaning (pickling),
equipment identification / stenciling & subsequent tagging, commissioning / validation
activities, testing and NDT work, costs associated with the use of construction rental or
owned equipment, vendor start up assistance, barricades and OSHA safety measures,
factory witness testing and any acceptance testing and operational tests, initial chemical
charging, cooling liquids, grogg type chemicals and any scaffolding and hoisting needs,
remember there could be a need for a full time hoist operator on union projects.
Major Equipment (M.E.) / Chemical / Manufacturing facility major equipment is
fundamentally all the components that are utilized in the above mentioned industries /
business sectors, the (M.E.) major equipment includes items such as the following
together with the judgment percentage to set the particular piece of major equipment
described below, a description of (A), (B) and (C) is described below.
Activators (B) / Agitators (A) / Air Dryers (B) / Air Handlers (B)
Bag house (B) / Blenders (B) / Bins (B) / Boilers (C)
Centrifuges (B) / Chlorine Evaporators (B) / Columns (B)
Compressors (B) / Condensers (B) / Conveyors (C) Crusher (B) Crystallizers (B)
Dearators (B) / Drums (A) / Dryers (B)
Emulsifiers (B) / Electrical Switch Gear (B) / Evaporators (B) Extruders (B)
Filters (B) / Presses (B) / Furnaces (C)
6
(A) = Large / static pieces of M.E. needing relatively minimal setting hours (and minimal
internal setting and aligning) 3% -7% of M.E. cost divided by $50 / hour will provide a
man hour budget for setting the M.E.
(B)= Mid sized pieces of M.E. needing additional setting and requiring internal work and
aligning work hours 5% -10% of M.E. cost.
(C)= Complex pieces of M.E. requiring a fair amount of assembly and setting / internal
aligning hours 7% -14% of M.E. cost will provide a man hour budget for setting the M.E.
Example of a calculation to determine the cost and percentage value of installing a
Reactor: 20 ton Reactor (with internals 5 ton), total weight 25 ton Purchase price
delivered to site = $98,345 Labor and construction equipment to install (lift into its final
location and set and align internals, does not include piping or E&I, excludes heavy lift
crane.) 2005 Cost basis:
Labor / Other
Foreman
Millwright
Millwright
Millwright
Millwright
Millwright
Equipment Operator
Chains / cables
Miscellaneous l
shims / rags /
grease
Flatbed trailer
Tractor
Total
Hours
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
1 day
LS
Unit Cost
$55
$52
$52
$52
$52
$52
$48
$200
$350
Total
330
312
312
312
312
312
288
200
350
6
6
$25
$35
150
210
$3,088
$98,345 divided by $3,088 = 3.14% note if you add the cost of the crane to this
calculation the percentage would increase.
All major equipment items need foundations, structural steel, platforms, piping, valves,
insulation, painting, electrical services, etc, etc. the commodities / bulk materials
required will be described in the following sections. Typical break-downs of the major
cost elements cost models of a Chemical / Process Plant are indicated on the next
couple of pages, hopefully this data will give the reader an appreciation of how large an
element of a capital cost estimate the major equipment really represents. The hours for
installing major equipment typically include all the activities related to receiving, storing,
lifting, moving to field location, setting, aligning, welding, bolting, leveling, grouting and
testing. Items or topics that the estimator / cost engineer needs to consider and be
aware of when considering the major equipment elements of the capital cost estimate
should include.
Pricing basis, in-house estimate or based on a quote (potential for scope creep /
future pricing increase due to situations were nozzles / baffles / bracket locations
are not fully known)
Long lead time in the fabrication and delivery of complicated pieces of major
equipment.
Transportation costs and logistics (wide loads, ocean freight or air freight).
Vendor assistance in the start up of complex items of equipment.
Insurance issues / Special QA / QC requirements.
Any performance / witness testing.
Cash flow / Special payment terms.
Warranty issues.
Required documentation O-M manuals etc / Spare parts.
Possible currency considerations for items being imported.
To determine the setting hours for these items of major equipment mentioned above
divide the setting value by $50 / hour, cranes and other lifting devices are not included in
this method. If the total cost of chemical / process plant is 100%, a characteristic breakdown of other major equipment specific items
MAJOR EQUIPMENT / PROCESS EQUIPMENT TYPICAL BREAKDOWN RANGE
OF FREIGHT, M.E. SETTING AND SPARE PARTS COST
Freight Costs North American domestic 3% - 5 % of ex works value of M.E.:
Freight Costs European domestic 3% - 5 % of ex works value of M.E.:
Overseas freight typically 7% - 10% of Major Equipment ex works value, consider import
duties if applicable. Setting M.E. in place, millwright related activities (excludes civil,
structural, piping, electrical insulation etc) typically range between 3% and 14% of the
Major.Equipment (ex-works value): Spare parts (5% of rotating equipment and 1% - 2%
of heat transfer and static equipment) typically cost 1% - 2.5% of the M.E. ex works
value.
These values are the average of 10 small, medium and large facilities constructed in
North America in the last seven years and cover a wide assortment of new / grassroots
process chemical / refinery plants. This values / percentages can vary by as much as
plus or minus 10% due to the specific situation encountered. Revamps and upgrade
projects do not fall into the above ranges. An additional break down of major equipment /
process equipment and support systems is indicated below
GENERAL BENCHMARKING / COST ESTIMATING DATA
This section of this chapter encompasses general data / rules of thumb for preparing,
benchmarking and auditing all types of capital cost estimates and project execution
plans. The assortment of data includes the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
This above mentioned data can offer guidance in reviewing / auditing scopes of work,
execution plans, home office staffing or field man-power levels, reviewing claims and
potential cost over-under runs. Representative cost and man-hour breakdowns can be
useful in reviewing current estimates or considering and reflecting on historical norms.
The listing indicated is an overall breakdown of project costs, the data is based on
historical data for process type projects built in North America described earlier and
shown on table A.3.1, on a sub-contractor basis, during the period 1995-2001. When
only a total installed cost (T.I.C.) value is known, this breakdown can be valuable in
providing overall basic data points for a rapid evaluation of engineering, procurement
and construction efforts that were / or will be required. The cost breakdown covers the
following major categories.
Major Equipment
Materials (Bulks / Commodities)
Labor Costs
Detailed Engineering and Procurement Activities (EPC Data)
Indirect Cost Elements
The capital project summary indicated in Section A 3 Table (5) has an estimated overall
T.I.C. cost of $35.689 million. From Table (5). Outside Engineering / Design firm is
10.23% or $3,109,000. By a further analysis / hypothesis assume that the Outside
Engineering all-in cost (billing rate) is $69 / hour, therefore we can calculate the total
number of engineering man-hours is as follows. Consideration should be given to the
fact that specific cost items such as CAD machines, computers etc, are included in
$3,109,000 value or are included in the $69 / hour billing rate.
This number would need to peak at possibly 50 65 at the mid-point of the detailed
design effort.
The number of detailed design hours per M.E. items = 45,058 = 523 man-hours
86 M.E. items
From the table A.3. (5), direct field labor costs are $8,142,000 the direct field cost hourly
rate is $36 / hr.
If we knew that the construction effort was planned too be completed in fourteen months,
we could determine the average manpower level, or the approximate number of
construction workers required too complete the work effort.
* This number could peak at 125 140 during the mid point of the construction effort;
this also excludes field indirect support, which could be another 20 35% more hours.
The value of Construction Management is $1,170,000 if we divide this value by $65.50
which is the all-in rate for Construction Management effort we would come up with
17,860 man-hours divided by a 14 month construction effort at 170 man-hours per
month would indicate that the average number of Construction management staff would
average out to be 7.5 individuals. Following on in the same vain the procurement effort is
valued at $173,000 the hourly rate for this activity is $59 per hour, the procurement effort
would typically take 5 months to complete, so $59 divided into $173,000 = 2,930 hours
divided by 5 moths divided by 166 man-hours per month would equal 3.5 procurement
personnel involved with the procurement / buy out effort.
Utilizing historical benchmark relationships, we can establish a number of front end
reporting tools to allow management to make some key decisions. The reports could
include: A scope of work, an appropriation budget (AFE estimate), front end loading /
schedules / project milestone schedules (30 90 180 day look ahead schedule),
engineering, procurement and construction work packages, field labor needs, progress
measurement / progress tools and cash call / expenditure and commitment reports
USA Productivity Factors (versus Gulf Coast): The normal approach of comparing
process / refinery / manufacturing construction productivity is to compare various
locations around the USA to a known basis or benchmark of 1.00 or 100 for Texas Gulf
Coast (open shop labor working from say Mobile, AL in the north and south to say
Corpus Christi, TX, - because there is so much historical cost data that has been
collected over the last 20 30 years, the term Gulf Coast productivity is well known and
understood term in the construction industry):
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona (Phoenix / Tucson)
Arizona
10
Union
1.10 - 1.15
1.25 1.35
1.10 - 1.15
1.10
Arkansas
California (LA / Long Beach
/ SF / SD / SJ)
California
Colorado (Denver)
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida (Jacksonville /
Miami / Orlando / St P )
Florida
Georgia (Atlanta)
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois (Chicago)
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland (Baltimore)
Maryland
Massachusetts (Boston)
Massachusetts
Michigan (Detroit)
Michigan
Minnesota (Minneapolis
St Paul)
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri (St Louis)
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada (LV / Reno)
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey (Newark /
Northern)
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York City
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
1.00
1.10
1.15
1.20 1.30
1.05
1.00 - 1.10
1.00
1.15
1.10
1.00 1.10
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
1.05 - 1.10
1.20 - 1.30
1.20
1.15 - 1.20
1.00
1.00 - 1.10
1.00
1.10 - 1.15
1.05
1.00 - 1.15
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.00
1.05 - 1.15
1.05 1.10
1.00 1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.00 1.10
1.05 - 1.10
1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.10
1.10 - 1.20
1.10
1.30
1.25
1.20 1.30
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 - 1.25
1.10 - 1.25
1.10 1.15
1.20 1.30
1.10 1.15
1.20 - 1.30
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.20
1.05
0.90 - 1.00
1.05 1.10
1.00 1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.05
1.05
1.00 1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 1.20
1.05 1.15
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
1.15
1.05 1.10
1.10 - 1.20
1.20 - 1.30
1.10
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.05 - 1.10
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.20
1.15
1.30 1.40
1.10 - 1.20
1.15
1.15
11
Ohio (Cleveland)
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania (Philadelphia
/ Pittsburgh)
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas (Dallas / Houston)
Texas (Gulf Coast) - Base
Case this includes Gulfport,
Baton Rouge, New Iberia,
Lake Charles, Beaumont,
Port Arthur, Baytown,
Texas City and Victoria:
(Note: in certain cases i.e.
large projects with a lot of
repeat / similar work
activities: productivity could
be 0.90 1.00 say an
average of 0.95)
Utah
Vermont
Virginia (Washington D.C.)
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
1.05 1.10
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.15 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
1.15
1.15
1.20 1.30
1.05 - 1.10
1.60 1.90
1.05
0.90 - 1.00
1.05
1.00 - 1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.00
1.10 - 1.20
1.50 2.00
1.15
1.05 - 1.10
1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 1.15 (typically all
work is completed on
open shop basis)
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.05
1.05
1.00 - 1.05
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.15
1.20 - 1.30
1.15
1.15
1.00 - 1.15
1.15
1.15
12
8 - 25 / ton
* In major cities such as New York, Chicago Philadelphia and Los Angeles etc this union
hourly rate ranges between $75 and $91:
Engineering / Home Office Costs / Data:
Function / General Data
Project Manager
Architect
Civil Engineer
Home office engineer
Estimator
Designer
Man-hours per item of major equipment
Man hours per PFD
13
250 -500
100 200
4/6
$21 - $50 / hour
$43 - $86 / hour
$43 - $91 / hour
4 - 12
30 - 50
60 100
4 8 / hours
For additional data specific to installation man-hour units refer to later chapters.
ESTIMATE ASSESSMENT SHEET / RATIO ANALYSIS
The following capital cost estimate review sheet sets the ranges minimum and maximum
for various activities, this data can be used as a data source to calibrate / compare
specific key elements of a process related project, this data applies to new / green field
construction applications.
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
15
16
17
10
11
12
13
14
14
Normal Range
2 5%
5 12%
20-50%
20-30%
40-125%
70-125%
10-55%
3.0 5.50 (Typical average 4.00)
Refer to Benchmark Data.
15-20%
7 12%
10 20%
3 5%
4 9%
0.15 2.25%
0.5 2%
5% to 7.5% of major equipment on
complex process facilities
0.1 1.5%
18
Freight
19
Operator Training
20
Operator Training
21
Royalties as a percentage of
M.E. (I.S.B.L)
Vendor assistance as percent of
D.L.
Home office engineering as
percent T.I.C.
Field supervision as percent D.L.
Construction equipment as
percent D.L.
Construction fee as percent D.L.
Construction fee as percent T.I.C.
CM cost as percentage of T.I.C.
Off sites, needs to be considered
as a separate issue.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
0.1 0 25%
8-17%
5-15%
12-20%
3 - 9%
1.25 - 4.0%
5 - 7.5%
If limited / or no scope or data is
available use 15-70% of the
(I.S.B.L.) value.
If multiplier is smaller / or greater
than 3.0 5.50 a more in depth
review should take place:
0 10%
2 6% on pass through value:
20 40 hours / ton
100 200 hours / ton
Average cost $12,500 - $17,500
per ton, average $15,000 per ton
(I.S.B.L.) inside battery limits (M.E.) major equipment (T.I.C.) total installed cost
(D.L.) direct labor
The following data / tables are a variety of man hour production units for various
construction trades that can assist an estimator / cost engineer in compiling both
conceptual and detailed cost estimates, for more detailed estimating units refer to
Section B-4.
15
17
occasions it may be cost effective to demolish a facility). This is the case if sizeable
amounts of alloy metals (stainless steel 304 and 316, brass, copper), carbon steel, cast
iron, sheet metal, aluminum, copper roofing / cable, structural steel, electrical equipment
and various piping materials are part of the scope of work to be demolished. The
hazardous material aspects / environmental facets of demolition / revamp work should
be considered, lead paint, toxic chemicals, PCBs, asbestos, contaminated soil and on
site or off site removal dumping / disposal costs for disposal of demolished / scrap
material must also be considered and estimated, credit values also should be evaluated.
Demolition / Revamp / Upgrade of Site Work / Concrete / Buildings:
Establish the quantities of demolition / revamp work, i.e., square feet, cubic
yards, tons, lineal feet etc. and the disposal methods, truck, railcar or barge, etc.,
consider disposal methods / tipping fees / disposal distance, hazardous
materials, specialized sub contractors and construction equipment and any
federal or state required documentation. Determine if the concrete is reinforced
or non-reinforced (plain), is it on grade or elevated, what method will be used to
cut or burn through this rebar.
Ascertain if any of the steel is fireproofed / sprayed on, does this need to be
removed, is any asbestos material contained within the fireproofing material,
what is required to encapsulate and remove this material. Resolve if any
18
demolished materials; i.e., structural steel, handrails, platform features etc. can
be salvaged and recycled. Determine pounds of ductwork to be removed or
revamped, can any main headers be reused, what about the insulation material.
Determine the quantity of structural steel in pounds / tons, metal decking (SF),
floor joists, platforms and grating in square feet and ladders / handrails in linear
feet (LF). Find out disposal methods, salvage costs from third party vendors /
haulers. Can any existing material be upgraded?
Electrical / Instrumentation:
To dismantle and remove electrical conduit, wiring, fixtures, equipment,
instrumentation, etc., estimate as new work and multiply by 0.40. To dismantle
and re-install multiply man-hours by 1.4
Trees and Shrubs (softwood): Remove trees / stumps and haul off surplus
aver 1-2.5 miles:
Diameter. Tree
0 to 9
9 to 12
12 to 18
18 to 24
Height
10 to 20
20 to 30
30 to 40
over 50
MH Each
4
8
10
16
Height
10 to 20
20 to 30
MH Each
6
10
20
12 to 18
18 to 24
30 to 40
over 50
12
24
2 MH
2.5 MH
0.05 hours / LF
Hand Excavation
Excavation 2.0 man-hours per CY / 2.62 man-hours per M3
Backfill 0.6 CY man-hours per CY / 0.80 man-hours per M3
OFF LOADING MATERIALS BY HAND:
Sand from trucks
Gravel / stone from trucks
Crushed rock / crusher run from trucks
Cement (sacked) from trucks
Bricks per 1,000
21
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
10 CY
0.33
0.55
7.50
3.00
0.10
0.28
0.34
0.50
4.50
NOTES: Man-hours do not take into consideration trucking or fine grading work; refer to
pertinent tables for these units. Hand place labor units contain, placing by hand with
shovels, loose earth in hand-throwing distance of stockpiles. The transfer of prestockpiled loose earth over an area: Stone, sand and spreading units take account of,
hand placing, with shovels, these materials from located stockpiles. Clamshell labor
units include the placement of materials from accessible stockpiles. Tamping by hand
and pneumatic tamping units include the compacting of pre-spread materials in 6 layer
lifts. Man-hours above for this type work are shown as laborer hours. If air tool
operators are needed for this work substitute / alternate this effort for above laborer
hours. For quantities over 1,500 CY multiply above units by 0.80.
RIP RAP
Placed by hand
Placed by machine
ITEM
OPERATOR
2.0 CY bucket
1.5 CY bucket
1.0 CY bucket
0.5 CY bucket
0.25 CY bucket
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.35
0.40
MAN-HOURS
BANKSMAN /
HELPER
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.35
0.40
TOTAL
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.70
0.80
Labor man-hour units are for loading excavated material from stockpile onto trucks for
transportation onsite or offsite. For quantities over 500 CY multiply above units by a
factor of 0.85.
22
SITE GRADING:
WORK HOURS PER (10) CY
ITEM
MAN-HOURS
OPERATOR
0.08
0.10
0.14
0.20
0.30
Work hours include necessary labor for operating and maintaining equipment for the
above type of work. For quantities over 5,000 C.Y. multiply above values by 0.85
HAND TRIM TRENCH BOTTOM
WORK HOURS PER (10) L.F.
ITEM
MAN-HOURS
LABORERS
0.28
0.58
0.75
1.00
Work hours are typical for ten (10) linear feet of trench. Work hours include small
amount of hand trimming. Work hours do not include trench excavation or installation of
pipes. For quantities over 1,000 LF multiply above units by 0.85.
COMPACT / TAMP/ FINE GRADE IMPORTED FILL
WORK HOURS PER 10 SY
ITEM
Motor grader 911
Sheeps foot / spiker
Vibrating roller (self propelled)
Fine Grade by hand
Fine Grade by machine
UNIT
10 SY
10 SY
10 SY
10 SY
10 SY
TOTAL
0.30
0.65
0.35
0.20
0.15
Work hours include labor as required for the above-defined items. For quantities over
1,500 SY multiply above units by 0.90.
COMPACTION OF BACKFILL AROUND ISOLATED FOUNDATIONS (to 95% of
maximum density per 10 CY)
23
By hand
With vibratory compactor
4.55 hours / 10 CY
1.15 hours / 10 CY
Medium
Heavy
Rock
(Rippable)
Load with
F.E. Loader
ITEM
TOTAL
0.33
0.39
0.57
0.66
0.54
0.78
1.11
1.22
0.93
1.02
1.14
1.20
1.38
1.47
1.98
2.10
0.52
1.00 CY bucket
0.75 CY bucket
0.50 CY bucket
0.25 CY bucket
1.00 CY bucket
0.75 CY bucket
0.50 CY bucket
0.25 CY bucket
1.00 CY bucket
0.75 CY bucket
0.50 CY bucket
0.25 CY bucket
1.00 CY bucket
0.75 CY bucket
0.50 CY bucket
0.25 CY bucket
1.50 2.50 bucket
Work hours include excavating and loading onto trucks. Work hours excluding blasting
and transportation. Work hours are based on excavations not exceeding 5 foot in depth.
If excavation is greater than 5 foot above units need to be multiplied by 1.20. For
quantities over 1,500 C.Y. multiply above units by 0.90.
Cost per CY for Excavating trench n / e 10 deep (average 7 deep) with 1 CY bucket
(daily output of backhoe = 400 CY / day) assume truck travels 1 mile to an on-site
location and off-loads materials in heaps, spreading and leveling transported material
not included in unit price, no tipping fees required. (2005 Cost Basis :)
Equipment / Labor
Hydraulic backhoe 1 CY
bucket
Operator
Truck 10 CY / 15 Ton
Driver
$ Cost
732
8 hours x $42.50
8 hours x $62.50
8 hours x $40.50
S/T
+ O / H & Profit
27.5%
Total
Cost per CY / 400 CY
340
500
324
1,896
521
24
2,417
6.04
0.25
CY
Bob Cat
Hydraulic Backhoe
Motorized Scraper D8
(cut & fill 35 cycles per
hour)
Dragline 75 ton crane
with 70 100 boom (with
clamshell or open
bucket)
100
0.50
CY
1 CY
1.50
CY
2 CY
2.5
CY
3 CY
7.5
CY
10
CY
500
600
750
1,000
1,250
1,500
N/A
N/A
600
500
750
1,00
0
1,000
1,500
1,500
2,500
1,750
3,000
2,000
3,500
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
250
N/A
400
N/A
750
N/A
1,200
N/A
1,500
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,500
N/A
3,500
75
100
150
250
400
500
N/A
N/A
Note: The above production rates could increase by 50% if construction site is open and
not congested and if excavation is completed in spring or summer months.
Multiply the above by 1.35 1.55 for rip able rock.
Multiply the above by 1.15 for dense / hard soil.
Multiply the above by 0.85 for sand / loose material
Equipment cost per day. (2005 Cost Basis :)
$5.70 / SY
$6.80 / SY
$7.25 / SY
$6.83 / M2
$8.14 / M2
$8.66 / M2
$8.19 / SY
$9.82 / M2
25
$13.55 / SY
$19.58 / SY
$16.22 / M2
$23.42 / M2
Natural / Loose
Condition
Pounds
2,565
2,737
2,425
2,820
2,745
3,136
N/A
Compacted to 90
95%
Pounds
3,030
3,615
2,825
3,140
3,135
N/A
3,696 (mixed)
The following table is the hourly output for Dragline operations. For quantities over
5,000 C.Y. multiply units by 0.85 (set up and dismantle of crane not included in following
production rates).
CY per Hour:
90 Swing Output per Hour
Drag line Bucket
Capacity
In C.Y.
Light Soil or Loam
Material
Sand Stone or Gravel
1.0
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.0
2.50
3.0
3.5
4.0
5.0
140
185
205
245
260
310
340
360
400
450
135
160
195
215
235
295
320
360
420
510
In place Earth
120
150
185
200
220
245
285
325
355
420
Hard Clay
100
120
150
170
175
210
250
295
325
390
60
85
95
120
125
155
195
210
225
310
$19.16 / SF
26
Concrete Piles:
Pile Type
Pre-cast Concrete
Piles up to 50 in depth
12 diameter
Ditto 18 diameter
Drilled Concrete piles
up to 50 in depth
12diameter
Ditto 18 diameter
$ per LF
(Low)
22.58
$ per LF
(High)
27.09
20.16
31.40
28.67
Unit
$ per M
(High)
88.83
Unit
LF
$ per M
(Low)
74.24
24.20
37.70
LF
LF
66.15
102.90
79.38
123.64
M
M
32.87
LF
94.03
107.78
Acre / Sq Yards
Acre / Sq Yards
Acre / Sq Yards
Acre / Each
Acre / Sq Yards
27
Units
Cu Yd
Cu Yd
Cu Yd
Cu Yd
Cu Yd
Sq Yd
Cu Yd
Rock
Transportation / Hauls
Total distance to tip, round trip
On site disposal distance
Hazardous Materials distance
Tipping Fees
Cu Yd
Cu Yd
Cu Yd
Cu Yd / Ton
Cu Yd
Lin Ft / Mile
Lin Ft / Mile
Lin Ft / Mile
Cu Yd / Ton
4
6
8
10
12
18
24
24.00
37.50
40.00
44.00
47.00
54.00
75.00
By Crane
0.60
0.70
0.45
0.75
0.30
0.33
0.63*
0.70*
28
0.55
0.60
0.35
0.60
Low
Average
pounds /
CY of
concrete
High
Kg / M3
of
concrete
Low
Average
SF of
formwork
per CY of
concrete
High
30
55
100
33
10
25
35
35
65
140
38
10
25
35
40
70
150
40
10
25
35
40
55
75
115
130
200
40
65
7
20
15
40
20
70
40
70
75
175
150
250
40
105
25
30
50
65
85
100
Finishes (Concrete)
1.5
3.5
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.2
0.8
0.5
1.0
3.5 / 5.0
6.5 MH s per cu. yd.
8.0 MH s per cu. yd.
0.22 MH s each
Reinforced Concrete 3,500 PSI / 25 MPA Budget Pricing: includes rebar / mesh fabric
were applicable, formwork (under slab and edge), concrete material, cranes, pumps,
29
buggies and labor to install (concrete, formwork and rebar), includes 5% waste and 5 to 7
uses of formwork, for quantities 10 CY / 10 M3 and above: Labor is based on merit shop
labor (hybrid of union and non-union). For applications with a high rebar content use
higher value. (2009 Cost Basis)
Description
Concrete Foundations
Footings 3 x 1
Mat foundation
Pile caps 3 x 3 x 3
Slab on Grade (excludes u/s
stone)
4 thick
6 ditto
8 ditto
Walls
6 thick
9 thick
12 thick
Elevated slab / Waffle slab /
Flat work
4 thick
6 thick
8 thick
Column / Beams
18 x 18
24 x 24
Stairs
Stairs and landing
Plinths / Housekeeping
Pads (less than 5 CY / M3)
$ Cost per CY
$ Cost per M3
173 205
173 231
173 252
226 268
226 305
226 331
152 205
152 205
152 205
200 268
200 - 268
200 268
278 599
278 599
278 599
362 782
362 782
362 782
289 389
289 389
289 389
378 509
378 509
378 509
504 714
504 714
662 935
662 935
452 872
593 1,139
525 1,019
688 1,097
Adjustment
For excavation and backfill add 5% 15% to above values.
For quantities less than 10 CY / M3 add 25% - 50% to the above values.
For 2,500-PSI - 17.5 MPA application multiply above values by 0.95
For 3,000-PSI - 20 MPA application multiply above values by 0.97
For 4,500-PSI - 30 MPA application multiply above values by 1.06
For slab on grade stone add 10% - 15% to above values.
For applications in major US cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los
Angeles etc add 10% - 22% to above values.
Occupancy Load Pounds / Square Foot:
Type of Facility
Occupancy Load
Pounds / Square
Foot
30
70 120 PSF
100 300 PSF
150 350 PSF
Pounds of
Rebar per
SF
1.00 2.00
1.25 2.50
1.75 3.50
2.00 4.50
2.40 4.80
2.75 6.00
3.00 7.00
Average
Kg per M2
Average
1.50
1.87
2.62
3.25
3.60
4.38
5.00
4.90 9.78
6.11 12.23
8.55 17.12
9.78 22.00
11.74 23.48
13.45 29.35
14.67 34.24
7.34
9.17
12.84
15.90
17.61
21.40
24.45
Quantities
350 SF
350 SF
500 #
50 CY
1 set
1 item
50 CY
31
Man-Hours
120
50
90
100
25
25
410 / 8.20 hours per CY or
10.75 hours per M3
Cu Yd / LF
0.029 Cu Yd / LF
0.051 Cu Yd / LF
0.066 Cu Yd / LF
0.117 Cu Yd / LF
Concrete strength expressed in PSI (Pounds per square inch) and Metric
Units - MPA (Mega Pascals)
PSI
MPA
(Approx)
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
17.5
20
25
30
30
35
SF per CY of
Concrete
20 30 SF
30 40 SF
70 100 SF
70 100 SF
Pounds
of Rebar
per CY
60 - 70
70 - 100
120 - 170
120 - 170
M2 per M3 of
Concrete
98 - 147
147 196
342 - 490
342 - 490
Kg of Rebar
per M3 of
concrete
36 - 42
42 - 60
73 - 103
73 - 103
Formwork: Material cost and man hours per 1 SF of Contact area timber formwork with
plywood and timber or metal framing with associated cast in place connections / bolts:
Cost basis 2009
Application
Fabricate &
erect &
dismantle
1st use
Erect,
clean &
repair 2
uses
Erect,
clean &
repair 3
uses
32
Erect,
clean &
repair 4
uses
Erect,
clean &
repair 5
uses
Erect,
clean &
repair 10
uses
Isolated
foundations
Walls 10 high
Elevated
columns &
beams
Elevated floor
slabs
Materials
$2.57
Materials
$0.50
Materials
$0.50
Materials
$0.50
Materials
$0.50
Materials
$0.50
Labor 1.25
hours
Materials
$2.81
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.70
Materials
$0.56
Materials
$0.56
Materials
$0.56
Materials
$0.56
Materials
$0.56
Labor 1.50
hours
Materials
$5.01
1.25
1.15
1.05
0.95
0.95
Materials
$1.00
Materials
$1.00
Materials
$1.00
Materials
$1.00
Materials
$1.00
Labor 2.25
hours
Materials
$3.57
2.00
1.90
1.80
1.70
1.70
Materials
$0.71
Materials
$0.71
Materials
$0.71
Materials
$0.71
Materials
$0.71
Labor 1.00
hours
0.75
0.65
0.55
0.45
0.45
Rule of thumb for formwork is 10 20 SF of formwork per one cubic yard of installed
reinforced concrete.
Formwork Erect, Strip and Repair:
Application
Formwork to u/s of
suspended floors
Formwork to walls
Man-Hours
SF
0.12 - 0.18
ManHours M2
1.30 - 1.95
0.10 - 0.15
1.08 - 1.65
Material Cost
per SF
$5.15
$6.51
$6.93
$8.24
Installation
Man-hours per
SF
0.15
0.17
0.20
0.23
Material Cost
per M2
$55.34
$70.04
$74.55
$89.04
Installation
Man-hours per
M2
1.60
1.83
2.15
2.48
For areas larger than 25,000 SF / 2,323 M2 multiply installation hours by 0.85
33
Pre-Cast Concrete Wall 3,500 PSI Reinforced Concrete (Insulated with batt
insulation 0.50 1.00 inch):
Tilt up and industrial applications:
Floor
Thickness
Material Cost
per SF
3
4
5
6
3.75
4.50
5.75
6.50
Installation
Man-hours per
SF
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.25
Material Cost
per M2
40.35
48.40
61.90
69.95
Installation
Man-hours per
M2
2.15
2.15
2.70
2.70
For areas larger than 25,000 SF / 2,323 M2 multiply installation hours by 0.85
Slab on Grade (SOG) Concrete Floors: includes supply and installation complete with
concrete, formwork and rebar, includes 4 thick sub base and polythene.
Thickness of Floor Slab
4 - 200 mm
6 - 250 mm
9 - 225 mm
$ SF
6.67
8.09
9.40
$ M2
71.35
86.99
101.12
Concrete Walls: includes supply and installation complete with concrete, formwork and
rebar.
Thickness of Wall
4 - 200 mm
6 - 250 mm
9 - 225 mm
$ SF
20.48
21.95
23.42
S M2
220.50
236.25
252.00
Pipe Bridge Budget Pricing Includes Foundations and Structural Steel (2009
Cost Basis)
Type
Materials per LF
Light Duty
Heavy duty
$66.68
$102.38
Man-hours to
install per LF
1.77
2.33
Materials per
M
$218.72
$335.79
Man-hours to
install per M
5.80
7.64
Cost per CY
$95
Cost per M3
$124
34
Percentage
20%
Rebar
Formwork
Total
$158
$221
$474
$207
$289
$620
33%
47% (20% M 80% L)
100%
As a rule of thumb for a quick method of estimating concrete, there is typically 100 200
pounds of rebar in 1 CY of reinforced concrete or 55 kg 110 kg in 1 M3
Use the above ratios to determine approximate values for rebar and formwork.
Gunite / Sprayed on Concrete
Thickness
1
1.5
2.5
3.0
Material cost
per SF
$3.31
$3.94
$6.77
$7.98
Installation
man-hours per
SF
0.10
0.12
0.17
0.22
Material cost
per M2
$35.60
$42.37
$72.87
$85.87
Installation
man-hours per
M2
1.08
1.29
1.83
2.37
For applications using mesh reinforcement add $0.50 $1.25 to material cost and add
10% to installation man-hours:
Injection grout / Concrete: (1:3:6) mix: (includes batching plant and pressure
pumps, excludes drilling costs)
$578 - $683 / CY
$767 - $908 / M3
$0.58 - $1.21 / SF
$0.21 - $0.35 / SF
$0.47 - $0.79 / SF
$0.53 - $0.95 / SF
$0.26 - $0.68 / SF
$6.24 - $13.02 / M2
$2.26 - $3.77 / M2
$5.06 - $8.50 / M2
$5.70 - $10.22 / M2
$2.80 - $7.32 / M2
35
Platforms, ladders, handrails, stair risers and other miscellaneous: perform take off and
establish pounds / tons of material and assign appropriate installation man-hours.
Checker plate, grating and floor plate and metal decking: perform take off and establish
square feet of material and assign appropriate installation man-hours, allow at least 5%
for waste in the cutting / fit up activity.
Order of Magnitude Structural Steel Estimating Data
Structural Steel weights per SF:
Manufacturing Building = 10 - 15 lb / S.F.
5 Floor Office Building = 15 25 lb / S.F.
Heavy industrial Facility = 25 75 lb / S.F.
Process Structures: Preliminary weights of structures can vary from 1.5 lb to 3.5 lb
(Cubic Foot of enclosed area).
Structural Steel as percentage of major equipment cost: usually falls in the 5% to 8% of
major equipment cost. The following pie chart delineates the various cost / fabrication
and installation activities associated with structural steel.
36
Material Cost
29%
Installation
20%
Priming paint
8%
Fabrication
34%
Delivery to site
2%
Cost per Kg / M2
$2.37 - $3.02
$18.82 - $22.26
$1.96 - $2.28 / SF
$10.49 - $24.54
37
$1.96 - $2.39
$2.23 - $2.86
$3.02 - $3.45
$2.65 - $3.18
$41.87 / LF
$136.10
$69.43 / LF
$23.85 / LF
$225.67
$77.54
Avg. MH/Ton
18-25
30-40
45-70
40-80
Adjust Units for Job Conditions, Including Height Factors and size of project.
Average Weights for Misc. Iron
Structure Type
1 x 3/16 Bar Type Grating - Galv
1 1/4 x 3/16 Bar Type Grating
Galv
Ladders - W Cage
Ladders - No Cage
Stairways 2 L - Handrail W Toe Plate
1 50 Pipe Handrail
Stair Treads Grating1.25 x 3/16
(9 wide x 3-0)
Ditto 1.25 x 3/16 Floor Grating
Average Weight
8 / 9 # SF / 0.03
M.H.s / SF:
9.5 /10.5 # SF /
0.03 M.H.s / SF
27 / 30 # LF
11 / 13 # LF
75 / 85 # LF
14 / 16 # LF
13 / 15 # LF
25 /30 # each
11 / 12 # / SF
38
Ref
#
1
Type of Material
Handrails: @ # horizontal
1.25 diameter CS welded to
vertical 1.50 diameter post
at 6 centers:
Ditto
Fabricate
& Install
Fabricate
Install
M.Hs per LF
0.60 M.Hs per LF
0.25 M.Hs per LF
Fabricate
Install
Fabricate
Install
Fabricate
Install
Fabricate
Install
Excludes painting:
Steel plate / ductwork
$3,000 - $3,500 per ton supply and erect
Erection of steel refractory duct work
Excluding brick lining 40 - 60 man-hours per ton
Aluminum Cable Tray (12 wide with all fittings and supports)
Width
18
24
Man-Hours
0.60
0.75
$ Material Cost
$43
$50.50
OOM pricing for a Field Erected Storage Tanks 250,000 - 500,000 gallons
Carbon Steel $1.80 - $2.30 per gallon
SS $2.20 - $2.70 per gallon
OOM pricing for installed piping system 2009 Pricing Basis:
Includes, Pipe material, fabrication and erection labor, fittings, valves, hangars, testing
and all required activities:
Pipe
Diameter
1.5
C. S.
$ Cost per
LF
$40 - $60
$60 - $80
$85 - $105
C. S
$ Cost
per M
$130 $200
$200 $260
$280 $340
SS 304
$ Cost per
LF
$65 - $95
$95 - $130
$135 $170
39
SS 304
$ Cost
per M
$210 $315
$315 $420
$445 $550
SS 316
$ Cost per
LF
$70 - $100
$100 $140
$145 $180
SS 316
$ Cost
per M
$225 $335
$335 $445
$475 $585
$110 $130
$130 $150
$360 $430
$430 $490
$175 $210
$210 $240
$575 $680
$680 $785
$190 $220
$220 $260
$615 $725
$725 $835
Insulated Metal Siding: supply and install, excludes structural framing / support:
Thickness
3.5 85 mm thick corrugated
metal siding with 1 thick
insulation
SF
$8.63
M2
$92.93
Cost per kg
$4.15 - $4.36
40
Number of Blocks
per SF.
GROUND
FACE UNITS
SPLIT FACE
FLUTED UNITS
8 SQUARE
1.125
1.125
3.375
1.125
1.125
Number of Blocks
per SF.
1.125
1.125
1.125
1.125
1.125
A Mason can install / lay 700-900 bricks in 8 hours 1,000 brick a day is considered
excellent productivity.
1,000 bricks weigh 6,500 6,750 pounds.
Hollow M / H s per SF
0.055
0.060
0.070
0.075
0.085
Solid M / H s per SF
0.060
0.065
0.075
0.080
0.090
1.12 Blocks + 2.5% waste = 115 blocks per 100 SF of wall surface.
15 CF of mortar required for 100 SF of wall surface.
41
Masonry Installation
Labor only: (excludes scaffolding)
Man-Hours Man-Hours
Per SF
Per M2
0.060
0.646
0.065
0.699
0.070
0.753
0.075
0.807
0.070
0.753
0.075
0.807
0.080
0.861
0.085
0.915
Wood Framing Man Hours per 100 Board Foot: (Douglas Fir):
Framing Type
Floor / ceiling
Joists
Bearing Plates &
Sills
Wall Framing /
Studs
(Hip) Short
Framing Pieces
Roof Ridge
Trusses (Stick
Built - not preengineered)
Roof Rafters
2 x 4
3.7 - 4.2
2 x 6
2.8 - 3.4
2 x 8
1.9 - 2.2
2 x 10
1.6 - 1.9
2 x 12
1.6 - 1.9
3.5 4.1
4.5 5.1
3.1 - 3.5
3.1 - 3.5
3.1 - 3.5
1.9 - 2.4
1.8 - 2.2
1.6 - 2.2
1.5 - 2.0
1.4 - 1.8
3.9 - 4.4
3.7 - 4.2
3.5 - 3.9
3.2 - 3.4
2.9 - 3.2
N/A
5.0 - 6.2
5.0 - 4.2
4.3 - 4.8
5.0 - 4.1
3.7 - 4.1
4.4 - 3.7
2.9 - 3.3
4.4 - 3.7
2.7 - 3.0
8.0 - 7.2
7.3 - 5.8
6.0 - 4.8
5.5 - 4.2
5.0 - 3.3
Plywood 0.5 exterior grade 16 Man Hours per 1,000 Sq. Ft.
QUARRY TILE FLOORING L & M (Dairy / Food Facilities) 2009 Cost basis:
4 x 4 x 3/8 floor thin set base
6 x 6 x 3/8 floor thin set base
4 x 4 x 3/8 floor mud set base
4 x 4 x 3/8 wall thin set base
4 x 4 x 3/8 base with cove top thin set base
FLOOR DRAINS (flat round top C.S. & S.S.)
4 diameter
6 diameter
2.50 MH
4.00 MH
42
$8.00 / SF
$7.25 / SF
$8.80 / SF
$8.45/ SF
$8.15 / LF
EXTERIOR FINISH
Wood Siding Cedar
Fiberglass Siding
Galv. Correg, Iron
Vinyl Siding
Correg, Aluminum
ROOFING
Built Up (3 layers)
$1.58 to $2.42 per layer of roof per Sq. Ft.
EPDM $0.89 to $1.63 per Sq Ft.
Asphalt Shingles
2.0 MH to 2.4 MH per 100 Sq. Ft. depending
On type of roof.
INSTALLED DUCTWOK PRICE / SUBCONTRACT BASIS (2009 Cost Basis)
Based on cost per pound includes all support / brackets etc.
Galv rectangular ductwork - commercial gauge (22-26)
Galv ditto ductwork - Rehab & Restoration
Galv ductwork - heavy gauge (10-14)(welded)
Aluminum ductwork
Stainless steel ductwork
Fiberglass ductwork - rigid
Insulation acoustical lining (internal)
Air Balancing
Plenum insulation rigid 2 thick
$5.34 - $6.99 / lb
$8.31 - $10.73 / lb
$9.79 - $15.18 / lb
$10.45 - $16.28 / lb
$14.85 - $20.74 / lb
$4.95 / SF
$2.09 - 2.92 / SF
$440 - $743 / AHU
$4.90 - $5.78 / SF
43
Remarks
Columns / Beams
Foundations and Flatwork
All in budget price (includes
pipe, fittings, hangars,
valves and erection)
Includes Engineering,
Procurement and
Construction activities
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Material
3 ply roofing shingles
Corrugated metal roofing (20 g)
1 Brick thick wall with mortar
Ditto with concrete block wall
4 thick glass blocks
3/8 thick glass
1 thick terrazzo flooring
(excludes bedding material)
Gypsum plaster ceiling with
lathing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2.85 3.35
0.85 1.20
Material
3 ply roofing shingles
Corrugated metal roofing (20 g)
1 Brick thick wall with mortar
Ditto with concrete block wall
4 thick glass blocks
3/8 thick glass
1 thick terrazzo flooring
(excludes bedding material)
Gypsum plaster ceiling with
lathing
30.66 36.00
9.15 - 12.90
PAINTING COSTS
Mid 2009 cost basis
Material Cost
Exterior (Alkyd/oil based) 5 gallon
Primer $29.82
Flat $28.04
Gloss $23.52
Masonry Exterior $25.52
One gallon of paint will cover 300-400 SF (1 coat)
Painter (in 8 hours) can perform the following
Spray 2,000-2,500 SF
Roller 1,000-1,500 SF
Brushwork 500-750 SF
44
45
70
60
Man Hours
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
Tons of Refrigeration
Ea
Ea
Ea
16/18
56/64
95/120
Ea
Ea
Ea
188/224
456/628
590/740
Air Dryer
2,500 CFM
5,000 CFM
10,000 CFM
46
50
60
Co al e sc e T y p e S e p er a to r (O i l-G as )
90
80
70
Man Hours
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10 0
20 0
300
40 0
GM P
Belt Conveyor
50 ton
100 ton
250 ton
Ea
Ea
Ea
38/44
98/106
158/168
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Crusher (Jaw)
47
38
86
246/294
444/526
5 00
60 0
Crusher (Jaw)
450
400
350
Man Hours
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
HP
140
120
Man Hours
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
10
15
HP
48
20
25
30
200
Man Hours
150
100
50
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
400
500
600
HP
25
Man Hours
20
15
10
0
0
100
200
300
Gallons
49
50
Man Hours
40
30
20
10
0
0
50
100
150
200
Tons
(238 barrels)
(595 barrels)
(1,190 barrels) Ea
(2,380 barrels) Ea
(5,950 barrels) Ea
(11,900 barrels)
Ea
Ea
Ea
70/90
120/180
250/400
540/620
700/850
900/1,250
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
16
40
40/80
80/100
Ea
Ea
Ea
88
164
420
50
250
300
Miscellaneous Items
(1)
CUBIC FEET /
CUBIC YARD
VOLUME (H.P.) / # OF PIECES
5 / 0.20 (2.5) / 7
10 / 0.40 (5.0) / 7
15 / 0.55 (7.5) / 7
25 / 1.00 (10.0) / 7
50 / 2.00 (15.0 / 7)
75 / 2.75 (20.0) / 7
100 / 3.70 (25.0) / 7
250 / 10.00 (35.0) / 7
(2)
M.H. per HP
96
120
180
240
280
300
350
450
38.4
24
24
24
18.6
15
14
12.8
C.F.M.
500
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
250,000
(3)
Man-hours
HP
0.5
1
1.5
3
5
12.5
25
35
50
75
Weight in
Pounds
(# Of Major
Pieces)
200 (4 / 8)
350 (4 / 8)
450 (4 / 8)
700 (4 / 8)
1,500 (6 / 12)
3,000 (6 / 12)
5,000 (10 / 20)
7,000 (10 / 20)
10,000 (10 / 20)
15,000 (10 / 20)
FLUID TYPE:
51
Man-hours
2.5
4
8
12
16
32
60
84
108
160
M.H. per
HP
5
4
5.33
4
3.2
2.56
2.4
2.4
2.16
2.13
H.P
1
2.5
5
7.5
15
M.H.s
6.5
8
12
22
32
(5)
# Of Pieces
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
5/7
Approximate
Weight Pounds
(# of Pieces)
Man-Hours
1,000
65,000 / 7/14
720
0.72
2,500
95,000 / 7/14
920
0.56
4,000
125,000 / 7/14
1,250
0.37
5,000
250,000 / 7/14
1,500
0.30
Number
Of Pieces
Weight
Pounds
ManHours
M.H. per
pound
2,500
6/12
600
21
0.04
5,000
6/12
1,000
32
0.03
52
(6)
10,000
10/20
1,500
42
0.03
25,000
10/20
3,700
72
0.02
50,000
10/20
4,500
81
0.02
100,000
10/20
6,300
114
0.02
Weight
Pounds /
# Of Items
ManHours
220 / 5
4.5
400 / 5
600 / 5
10
900 / 5
12
1,200 / 5
14
1,400 / 7
10/14
16
1,750 / 7
10/14
20
2,400 / 7
16/18
24
3,000 / 7
20/22
30
5,500 / 7
24/28
36
7,500 / 7
30/37
Mixer / Extruder
53
Mixer / Extruder
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
HP
$2,380
$3,752
$9,874
4/6
6
16
12 0
Man Hours
10 0
8 0
6 0
4 0
2 0
0
0
1 00
20 0
3 00
40 0
S q u a re F o o t
50 SF
100 SF
500 SF
Ea
Ea
Ea
54
14
27
124
5 00
60 0
Man Hours
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Gallons
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
22
40
58
84
96/108
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
42
80
88/96
122/136
158/172
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
55
38/42
72/84
116/124
160/172
184/192
5000
6000
70
60
Man Hours
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
12
14
16
12
14
16
GPM
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
8
GP M
56
10
Sub Station
Sub Station
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
K VA
Vessels Vertical
Vessels Vertical
9
0
1 - 10
10 - 20
20 - 40
Weight in Tons
57
40 - 60
Weight in Tons
1 10
10 20
20 40
40 60
8.40
5.10
4.10
3.70
Vessels Horizontal
Weight in Tons
1 10
10 20
20 40
40 60
8.10
4.90
3.90
3.40
Material
$512
$607
M.H. s
2.25
2.45
Sodium H.P.
100 watt
250 watt
Material
$745
$814
M.H. s
2.75
2.95
Incandescent
100 watt
250 watt
$130
$162
Material
M.H. s
2.25
2.45
Material
$713
$891
M.H. s
2.75
3.15
Sodium H.P.
100 watt
250 watt
Material
$831
$1022
M.H. s
3.25
3.65
Incandescent
100 watt
250 watt
Material
$345
$392
M.H. s
3.35
3.50
58
$17.56 / LF
$20.26 / LF
$25.61 / LF
$22.86 / LF
$28.33 / LF
$34.93 / LF
$19.56 / LF
$23.32 / LF
$30.20 / LF
$27.39 / LF
$31.79 / LF
$40.10 / LF
Material
$8,402
$12,179
M.H.s
42
64
Man hours
Anaerobaric Chamber 12 CF
$5,924
$4,406
$5,946
10
$3,339
1.5
O.O.M. PRICING FOR VESSELS & TANKS C.S. & S.S. ASME 100 PSIG (2009
Pricing Basis):
Weights as per Standard Gage for steel sheet are as follows;
0.25 thick = 10.46 pounds / SF. 0.50 thick = 20.91 pounds / SF.
0.75 thick = 31.36 pounds / SF. 1.00 thick= 41.82 pounds / SF.
To determine weight use the following formula Weight (W) = 12DTL
Where W = weight in pounds and D = Diameter of Vessel / Tank in inches and T = Shell
/ wall thickness in inches and L = Height or length of Vessel / Tank
Add 10% for normal nozzles skirts, man ways and baffles
Add 20% for complex nozzles skirts, man ways and baffles
59
O. O. M. Costs per pound with typical brackets, supports and nozzles etc.
2009 Cost Basis.
Pounds
Weight
Cost /
Pound
C.S.
9.07
7.97
6.57
6.02
4.98
3.36
2.42
1.87
500
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
100,000
Cost /
Kg
C.S.
19.96
17.52
14.45
13.23
10.94
7.38
5.31
4.12
Cost /
Pound S.S.
304
13.55
12.42
10.31
9.27
7.78
5.48
3.59
2.86
Cost /
Kg S.S.
304.
29.79
27.33
22.68
20.39
17.13
12.05
7.90
6.27
Cost /
Pound S.S.
316
16.20
14.43
12.00
10.61
8.79
5.70
4.21
3.33
Cost / Kg
S.S. 316
35.64
31.74
26.40
23.34
19.32
12.55
9.27
7.32
Adjustments: To determine setting man hours multiply the above results by 6% -8% and
divide by $45 / hour. For intricate designs needing internal brackets / supports etc add
15% to 25% to above results. For vessels with half and full jackets add 15% and 25% to
above results
Electric Motor hours to install 240/440 v
H.P.
2.5
5
10
25
50
Man-Hours
3
5.5
8
16
24
UNIT
$ COST
3
4
6
8
10
12
16
18
20
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
$12.05
$13.70
$17.90
$23.08
$26.69
$29.40
$34.24
$36.09
$37.15
60
UNIT
COST
3
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
$13.43
$13.85
$17.63
$22.51
$26.05
$29.70
$33.39
$37.66
$42.24
$47.01
UNIT
COST
1 SF
2 SF
4 SF
8 SF
12 SF
18 SF
24 SF
36 SF
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
$220.00
$313.50
$410.30
$715.00
$819.50
$974.60
$1034.00
$1262.80
UNIT
COST
4
6
8
10
12
18
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
$31.21
$34.06
$38.67
$46.86
$52.16
$84.24
ELECTRICAL WORK:
If the scope of this item is vague an allowance of $15,000 to $25,000 per motor is
usually adequate to estimate the costs associated with a unit sub station and switch
gear, power / control wire & conduit, grounding and area lighting, this would exclude
main sub station (refer to Section D 1 for more details).
LABOR MAN HOURS PULLING CABLE IN CONDUIT (excludes hookup / connections)
61
WORK ITEM
No 12 solid wire
No 10 ditto
No 8 ditto
No 1/0 stranded wire
No 2/0 ditto
No 500 MCM stranded wire
No 1,000 ditto
UNIT
1000 LF
1000 LF
1000 LF
1000 LF
1000 LF
1000 LF
1000 LF
UNIT
1000 LF
1000 LF
1000 LF
Material
Cost
40,378
69,178
91,651
1,209
230
Labor manhours
44
84
142
26
3
541
1,131
2,310
262
6
8
12
6
376
777
1,426
277
416
844
1,616
801
1,016
1,929
3,929
6,108
8
10
12
8
10
14
16
10
14
18
24
10
6,970
7,737
217
14
17
2
460
1,932
2,048
285
4
6
12
3
62
564
2,321
2,426
343
5
8
18
4
690
2,735
3211
59
173
227
7,516
6
12
22
2.2
4.2
3.5
30
18,081
34,516
3,078
8,100
135
190
245
317
392
96
149
180
234
279
Add 25% to
above
24
56
84
26
48
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.55
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.55
Add 25% to
above
0.75
56
67
9
14
19
25
14
20
26
30
Add 25% to
above values
1.57
2.15
3.03
13.56
45.91
257.51
0.95
0.55
0.33
0.40
0.50
0.55
0.33
0.40
0.50
0.55
Add 25% to
above values
0.175
0.375
0.425
0.50
2
3.50
INSTRUMENTATION
63
An allowance of $15,000 to $25,000 per Major Equipment item is usually adequate for
early budgeting of instrumentation work. Refer to Section D 1 for additional information.
BELT CONVEYOR Man Hours (includes steel structure, belts and drives,
excludes foundations
Width in inches
12
14
16
18
20
24
30
Man-hours per LF
1.75
2.05
2.25
2.40
2.65
3.25
3.50
ENGINEERING
Typically 400 800 home office engineering & design hours are adequate for each
major Equipment item refer to section D 1 for additional data. Revamp projects typically
take 20 50% more H.O. engineering hours to design.
Refer to Section D 1 for additional information on:
Major Equipment
Piping Systems
Insulation
E/I Systems
Civil / Structural and Architectural
2 screwed
joints
2 welded
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Production
weld Manhours Number
1.95
2.50
3.30
3.75
4.35
4.85
5.50
64
Column A
Combined
erect and weld
Man-hours per
LF
0.30
0.35
0.45
0.55
0.60
0.75
0.80
0.90
0.95
Column A
Combined
erect and weld
Man-hours per
M
0.98
1.15
1.48
1.80
1.97
2.46
2.62
2.95
3.12
18
20
24
0.85
0.90
1.00
6.00
6.75
7.75
1.00
1.05
1.15
3.28
3.44
3.77
2 screwed
joints
2 welded
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
24
Production
weld Manhours Number
1.95
2.50
3.30
3.85
4.55
5.35
6.20
7.10
7.85
9.45
Column A
Combined
erect and weld
Man-hours per
LF
0.60
Column A
Combined
erect and weld
Man-hours per
M
1.97
3.12
3.44
4.17
5.44
5.74
6.04
6.46
7.05
7.54
8.36
9.02
0.95
1.05
1.27
1.66
1.75
1.84
1.97
2.15
2.30
2.55
2.75
OSBL $ / LF
19.40
34.66
55.65
75.58
104.83
137.38
OSBL $ / M
63.18
114.06
182.74
248.15
343.44
450.82
ISBL $ / LF
38.80
69.32
111.30
151.05
209.56
274.75
ISB / $ M
127.41
227.05
365.59
495.13
687.83
900.58
Steam tracing copper pipe 0.50 diameter: to piping systems and major equipment.
Material Cost / LF
17.86
Labor Man-hours /
LF
0.55
Material Cost / M
58.62
Labor Man-hours /
M
1.80
Material Cost /
LF
4.66
7.26
Labor Manhours / LF
0.25
0.30
Material Cost /
M
15.32
23.80
Labor Manhours / M
0.82
0.98
Material Cost /
LF
6.31
8.69
10.49
Labor Manhours / LF
0.25
0.30
0.53
Material Cost /
M
20.67
28.51
34.45
Labor Manhours / M
0.82
0.98
1.74
Minimum Hours
per task
4
Minimum Hours
per task
6
Average number of fittings / valves for various C.S. / S.S. piping diameters /
per 1,000 LF of process related piping systems (based on 17 process
related projects) I.S.B.L. work:
Pipe
Diameter
0.5
0.75
1
1.5
2
4
Couplings / Elbows
unions / (90 & 45
Flanges (50% degree)
(30%)
291
305
187
119
91
82
173
110
111
70
55
49
Tees /
concentric
- eccentric
reducers
(10%)
57
52
37
25
18
16
66
Caps / blinds /
plugs &
miscellaneous /
weldolets /
sockolets /
nipples
(10%)
58
54
37
24
18
16
Number of
Fittings
579
521
372
238
182
163
Number o
Valves
372
247
81
35
26
14
74
64
59
57
33
25
6
8
10
12
18
24
44
38
35
35
21
16
16
13
12
10
7
5
15
13
12
11
6
5
149
128
118
113
67
51
12.5
6.75
6.25
5.75
4.35
3.70
Percentage
35%
25%
40%
Percentage
10%
10%
15%
15%
10%
15%
10%
15%
Ball
Butterfly
Check
Gate
Globe
Plug
Swing
Other
Air Conditioning Cost Comparison: 2 Pipe FCU system V's 4 Pipe FCU system
Cost Model 244,500 SF Mixed use facility Offices / Apartments / Hotel 2009 Cost Basis
On 7 floors (2009 Cost basis)
SF
M2
Cost
Cost
2 Pipe FCU system
244,500 SF 22,723 M2 $25.38
$273
4 Pipe FCU system
244,500 SF 22,723 M2 $27.13
$292
Welding single pass to metal plate - Horizontal:
Weld width
1/16"
1/8"
3/16"
1/4"
5/16"
Man-hours per LF
0.25
0.35
0.55
0.70
0.85
67
Man-hours per M
0.82
1.148
1.804
2.296
2.788
Man-hours per LF
0.31
0.44
0.69
0.88
1.06
Man-hours per M
1.025
1.435
2.255
2.87
3.485
Elbows / Unions
/ Tees
4.0
4.5
5.0
8.5
14.5
Ground Fault
Indicator (GFI)
8.0
11.0
14.0
18.0
22.0
Explosion proof
fittings
7.0
9.5
14.0
17.5
21.0
Material Cost
$1,221
Man-hours
4.5
$974
$1,466
$2,294
3.75
4.25
26
Steam Tracing: (2009 Pricing Basis) includes one length of pipe / tube, shut off valve,
supports, strainers, traps, excludes insulation and any excavation.
Diameter
0.50
0.75
1
C S schedule
40 tube / pipe /
LF
Material
$17.66
$20.09
$23.47
C S schedule
40 tube / pipe /
LF
Man-Hours
0.75
0.84
1.10
Copper pipe /
tube / LF
Copper pipe /
tube LF
Material
$16.61
$19.13
$22.90
Man-Hours
0.64
0.72
0.93
68
Item
Man-Hours
2.60
5.50
1.25
3.20
2.75
3.50
6.50
2.75
1.55
1.75
Gas Fire Suppression Systems: (2006 Pricing Basis) Includes storage of gas / bottles and
rack and distribution piping system: based on a 4 floor, 257,000 SF Facility Computer Administration. The gas is argon nitrogen / FE - 241 / FM - 200 / (non-ozone depleting- inert
gas, not Halon or C02).
Cost per Cubic Yard / M3 of area to be suppressed (2009 Pricing basis):
Up to 1,000 Cubic Yards / 765 M3$58 - $69 / Cubic yard - $75 - $90 / M3
1,000 - 2,500 Cubic Yards / 1,530 M3 - $52 - $63 / Cubic yard - $67 - $83 / M3
Man-hours
4.5
8
12
17.5
Man-hours
82 man-hours
104 man-hours
124 man-hours
144 man-hours
Man-hours
10.2
10.8
12.3
14.5
Average for Field Run Piping Labor units 80% straight run - 20% direction/ elevation changes
Field installation only n/e 25' above grade or FFL:
69
Diameter in inches
0.05
0.05
PVC/CPVC
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
0.030
0.048
0.035
0.056
0.045
0.074
0.085
0.140
0.175
0.289
M-H's per LF
Average per LF
0.039
Average per M
0.046
0.128
Diameter in inches
0.05
C.S.A53
M-H's per LF
0.060
0.149
0.05
0.113
0.196
2
0.232
0.369
4
0.761
6
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
0.030
0.048
0.035
0.058
0.045
0.074
0.15
0.248
0.185
0.305
Average per LF
0.039
0.046
0.06
0.199
0.245
Average per M
0.128
0.152
0.196
0.652
0.804
Diameter in inches
0.05
0.05
Glass
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
M-H's per LF
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.015
0.025
0.225
0.349
0.3
0.465
Average per LF
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.05
0.05
0.02
Average per M
0.287
0.065
Diameter in inches
0.383
0.941
4
1.255
6
Stainless Steel
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
M-H's per LF
0.12
0.192
0.125
0.206
0.15
0.248
0.185
0.305
0.235
0.388
Average per LF
0.156
0.166
0.199
0.245
0.311
Average per M
0.512
0.543
0.652
0.804
1.021
Sch 20 Sch 20
Sch 20
Sch 40 Sch 40
Sch 40
Sch 80
Sch 80
Sch 80
inches
7' Str't
3' Com
10' Aver
7' Str't
3' Com
10' Aver
7' Str't
3' Com
10' Aver
7' Str't
3' Com
10' Aver
0.07
0.26
0.13
0.07
0.26
0.13
0.08
0.28
0.14
0.08
0.33
0.16
0.11
0.65
0.27
0.11
0.65
0.27
0.12
0.75
0.31
0.14
0.77
0.33
0.20
1.15
0.49
0.20
1.15
0.49
0.24
1.40
0.59
0.26
1.55
0.65
0.26
1.65
0.68
0.26
1.65
0.68
0.32
2.00
0.82
0.33
2.15
0.88
10
0.30
2.30
0.90
0.35
2.40
0.97
0.40
3.15
1.23
0.48
3.65
1.43
12
0.36
2.80
1.09
0.43
3.25
1.28
0.54
4.00
1.58
0.62
4.75
1.86
14
0.42
3.50
1.34
0.47
3.85
1.48
0.57
5.20
1.96
0.68
5.85
2.23
16
0.45
4.25
1.59
0.56
4.95
1.88
0.68
6.50
2.43
0.80
7.35
2.77
18
0.52
4.85
1.82
0.66
6.00
2.26
0.83
7.90
2.95
0.95
9.30
3.46
20
0.60
5.85
2.18
0.77
7.10
2.67
0.85
9.45
3.43
1.07
10.90
4.02
24
0.72
7.40
2.72
0.95
9.60
3.55
1.15
12.25
4.48
1.35
13.75
5.07
30
1.00
11.70
4.21
1.20
13.65
4.94
1.50
16.50
6.00
1.75
18.50
6.78
Notes:
(1) Hours are for erection of spools / piping runs n/e 25 ' above grade or finished floor level
(2) Hours exclude shop or field fabrication, hangars, brackets, valves and any testing
70
(3) Hours include material handling from piping lay down area
(4) Cranes / welding machines are excluded
(5) Assumes 7' straight pipe and 3' of complex pipe (elbows / tee's / stub ends)
(6) Man-hours are for bolt-up's and field welds (not fabrication production welds)
For complete piping system including fabrication shop and items in (2) above add 35% to units
For OSBL piping multiply above units by 1.22
Note on large projects multiply above values by 0.85
Note on small / complex projects multiply above values by 1.20
Fire Sprinkler Systems: For chemical / manufacturing type facilities on 2 or more levels: Based
on 10,000 SF includes CS Schedule 40 4 diameter headers, 2 and 1 branches and heads:
2009 Cost Basis.
Ref
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
System Type
Deluge System
Wet system (light
hazardous)
Ditto (extra
hazardous)
Dry system (light
hazardous)
Ditto (extra
hazardous)
Wet standpipe
system 4 diameter
vertical
Ditto 6 diameter
vertical
Materials
Labor
Total Cost
$3.14
$1.35
$4.02
$2.37
$7.15
$3.72
$2.59
$4.76
$7.35
$1.57
$2.70
$4.27
$2.86
$4.79
$7.65
$38.50
$28.60
$67.10
$59.40
$45.10
$104.50
Includes: hangars, excludes holes through floors and walls, excludes painting
Miscellaneous Piping Units: 2009 Cost Basis.
Piping Values
Material Cost (CS - A53)
Fabrication
Erection
Ton
$3,300 - $4,400
20 40 hours per ton
100 200 hours per ton
Average Value
$3,850
30 hours per ton
150 hours per ton
$ Cost per M
102
131
167
207
228
260
312
$ Cost per LF
31.24
40.21
51.25
63.12
69.78
79.37
95.21
71
20
24
364
407
111.24
124.16
Excludes river and road crossings, extensive rock ripping, pumping stations, detailed design and
construction management:
Adjustments:
As was stated earlier, the skill set of a cost engineer / estimator are many, to be
successful he or she require a good appreciation of the construction cycle, it helps
greatly to have had field experience The individual must understand all elements of the
Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) big picture, construction practices,
computer skills, manpower productivity / production knowledge compared to say
known locations (i.e. Gulf Coast or North West England), basic and detailed engineering
concepts, value engineering basics, contractual arrangements (terms and conditions
types of contracts utilized in the construction marketplace), time management / speed,
accuracy, persistence, and ability to roll up his or her sleeves and do what is required to
get the job done are other necessities of this profession in addition to an honest sense of
judgment and a bias toward orderliness, (its a demanding job !!! and someone has to do
it and the rewards are reasonable). The profession of Cost Estimating / Project Controls
is gaining momentum both from career prospects (stepping stone to upper management)
and remuneration rewards, a good / competent estimator is hard to find, all the good
ones are usually gainfully employed, the salary expectations have increased significantly
in the last five years or so and although not the most glamorous of jobs (i.e. the picture
of a cost estimator is a guy or gal in the back room with a eye shade crunching numbers
this of course is not the case) there will always will be a demand for competent cost
estimators in the foreseeable future.
72
SECTION A - 5
SITE SELECTION CRITERIA / CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING DATA
SOURCES & ESTIMATING CHECKLIST
The compilation of an early front end / conceptual cost estimate (CAPEX) is the first part
of interrelated engineering activities in the projects life cycle; the end result is to convey
the estimated EPC cost of the proposed CAPEX project to the business owner or to
senior corporate management. This database focuses primarily on the compilation of
CAPEX estimates. The challenge the individual compiling an early phase CAPEX
estimate is to accurately capture the final costs of the following activities (of course there
may be additional activities that need to be estimated).
Off sites (work outside the facilities footprint roads, rail spurs, piping, electrical
work, product loading areas etc,).
The extent and magnitude of each of the above cost items (estimate line items) of
course is dependent in many ways on the complexity of the proposed facility, physical
size and location (remote or easily accessible) of the proposed CAPEX project, the cost
of labor and materials, together with the construction approach, the anticipated
productivity that the workforce will achieve and the date when the project is needed by
its eventual facility user. The CAPEX estimate basically determines the projects cost
budget. As the detailed design effort is completed and more project data is established,
additional CAPEX estimates will be compiled during the projects life cycle to ensure that
the project budget is maintained. This particular section deals primarily with Site
Selection, Estimating Data Sources and provides a detailed Estimating checklist.
Existing facility / site can a current site accommodate new facility, can existing
buildings be reconfigured, is the current infrastructure capable of such a
significant expansion - Yes or No.
New Location closer to marketplace, new staffing needs (were will they come
from), new utilities (can we obtain them or will we have to produce them), new
facilities, training issues, quality of life issues, community dedication to new
facility and employment opportunities, government help or interference, can we
get grants / special treatment for locating a large number of employees into this
community Yes or No.
Land and Construction cost issues (see above). This will serve as the initial
Owner Budget (the more detail that can be provided with this estimate, the more
realistic the cost estimate will be). Many times the site selection study might
include 3 6 different locations, some in the US and some overseas.
Project timing needs (normal construction approach, fast track, or full speed
ahead damn the torpedoes we need to beat our competitors to the marketplace
money is not the main consideration, getting the product into stores ASAP is
the main driver).
Usually because the project is so complex and the cost of the future investment is so
significant to the business, the steering committee will bring in the expertise of key
individuals to process this Site Selection Criteria Report. The individuals / team that
would produce this work effort include: Corporate Engineering staff, A Project Manager,
Legal assistance, Purchasing, Realtors (possibly if new facility is required), R&D staff,
Operations / Facilities Management staff, Human Resource staff, Finance staff,
Estimating staff, perhaps the services of a third party A/E firm, this task force typically
would be charged with coming up with a recommendation in perhaps a period of 8 12
weeks. Research and topics that need to be evaluated include some or all of the issues
above and possibly more. When these decisions / questions have been addressed, the
Business leadership typically will approve a partial release on the project (say - $0.50
$ 2 Million) typically 1% to 2.5% of the project budget for the services of an Architectural
/ Engineering firm (A/E) - Engineering firm (EPC), for a front end concept study, this will
allow some conceptual engineering to take place, another important and key deliverable
will be an additional cost estimate, this will be compiled by an A/E - EPC firm when the
design concept is 5 10% complete (of the final construction / engineering deliverables),
so this second estimate is basically used to confirm the owners first initial cost
estimate, if the cost estimate / economics are still positive the project will be partially or
fully fund and allowed to proceed. Topics to be that should be considered in this frontend concept study include:
The Site Selection Criteria and Business Decision (Front End Study) should perhaps
come up with 2 or 3 locations for senior management to consider and to make the final
decision on were to locate the new facility. After conclusion of this front-end report, if the
project is released for execution, the owner will enter into a contract(s) for detailed
design and construction management services, typically the construction manager or the
owners estimating resources will compile a number of estimates to confirm and control
the cost of the future facility, during the Engineering, Procurement and Construction
(EPC) effort. To produce an accurate front end / conceptual estimate some engineering
data will many times need to be produces this includes:
A scope of wok statement, a site development layout or plan indicating the utilization of
the property, any boring logs, an environmental assessment report, any preliminary
engineering reports, any Property Conditions Assessments (PCA), a major equipment
list) priced out were possible), any Process Flow Diagrams (PDFs), any modular / pre3
BNI:
Compass International:
Laxton:
Marshall & Swift:
R.S. Means:
Walker Publications
Spons (UK publication):
Cost Engineering Data for possible use Process / Manufacturing Industry - Historical
Cost Indexs / Indices
Estimate basis (inclusions / exclusions / drawings with latest revision and date /
specifications used in the estimating effort).
Bulk material quantities (how were these determined).
Quality of scope document.
Specific project risks.
Undeveloped engineering / scope.
Evaluation of the quality of the engineering deliverables upon which the capital cost
estimate is based.
Specifications to be used (industry standard or owner produced specs and
standards).
Bidding climate / competitors.
Labor productivity basis.
New technology.
Validity of bid 30 days or 90 days.
Current market conditions.
Political outlook.
Hourly rates for engineering / procurement and construction.
Engineering / estimating errors.
Engineering / estimating omissions.
Currency exchange rates.
General contingencies / resolution factors.
Project approach, Design build / lump sum / GMP / fast track.
Take off allowances.
Cost impact of T & Cs.
Overtime / shift work allowance.
Warranty costs.
Consequential damages.
Bond requirements.
Performance guarantee.
Design growth allowance / resolution allowance.
Profit margin.
Payment terms 45 days (finance costs).
Incentives from state / host country.
Import duties, taxes, VAT.
Penalty clause / liquidated damages.
Escalation / inflation rates should be considered and compiled in relation to long lead
equipment purchases, labor and material categories.
A detailed risk analysis should be conducted with the key project players to
determine what level of accuracy is required based on the goals of the project.
Plus many more project specific situations.
After these topics / issues have been discussed / modified /agreed to and if necessary
missing scope items have been discovered and the errors have been incorporated into
the capital cost estimate, the capital cost estimates correctness should be confirmed
by an independent audit / benchmark comparison, hopefully by (an in house expert) or
by a third party / outside expert, sometimes this situation is not feasible due to time
constraints and economic factors, this is typically done by owner companies when
reviewing a estimate from a EPC firm. The benchmarking review / audit / validation
effort is initiated by comparing major project cost elements for example, ratio of major
equipment to total installed (is it 4.0 times the major equipment or 5.0 times or 6.0
times), engineering costs per piece of major equipment, engineering man hours per
piece of major equipment, labor and bulk material estimated costs / percentages Vs
typical norms / ranges for the process industry, cost of concrete per CY / M3, man hours
per LF / M of process pipe etc. refer to section A 3 Estimate Review sheet for examples
of this benchmarking data.
After this activity if time is available: Key project elements such as;
This benchmarking data should be collected and calibrated for all future capital cost
reviews. These metrics must be judged against related / similar capital projects (refer to
section A - 3 Estimate Review sheet(s) for examples of this and the ratio / percentages
and general capital cost estimating standards and guides previously mentioned to make
certain that the capital cost estimate is reflective as much as possible to the current
scope of work statement and is in line with the companies historical installation norms
be they in-house estimating standards or external estimating standards.
Following these benchmarking reviews / auditing / validation activities the capital cost
estimate is ready to be approved by upper management, this document, this completed
capital cost estimate, together with the milestone schedule and a narrative of the basis
of the estimate will be issued to management, many times management will ask more
questions during there review. These questions many times will prove to be useful and
in fact will be a QA / QC tool, they can serve to improve the accuracy of the capital cost
estimate and in addition ensure that the historical company data base is accurate /
useful and is being used in the manner it was established for. If the capital cost estimate
is a lump sum bid then this will be the baseline document for future change orders and
possible future claims, it is imperative that this basis of estimate is adequately
documented and described.
ORGANIZATION / CODE OF ACCOUNTS (C.O.A.) - WORK BREAKDOWN
STRUCTURE (W.B.S) OF COSTS REPORTING
Work Item
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Below is a typical Industrial / Process facility - C.O.A. / W.B.S. that is described in more
detail in Section B 2.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
Off-sites.
Construction Equipment / Fueling / Maintenance.
O / H and In-directs / Field In-directs.
Engineering / CM / Validation / Start-up.
Contingency.
Escalation / Currency Impact / Taxes / Import Duties (could be included with (C)
above / Grants / Incentives.
U. Spare Parts / Vendor Assistance / Client Costs / Training / Expense items.
V. Other items, such as Land Purchase, Finance Costs etc.
W. Owner Costs / Owner Provided Equipment (OPE).
The following gives an illustration of various types of work description / code of accounts
(C.O.A.) categorized by types of construction, this format can be used in establishing
and setting up the estimating structure during the estimating effort.
Sample / Representative Codes of Account (C.O.A.) Work Breakdown Structure
(W.B.S.):
COA / WBS
No.
00.xxxx
00.5000
00.6000
00.7000
01.0000
01.5000
02.0000
03.0000
03.5000
04.0000
20.0000
20.0500
20.1000
20.2000
20.2100
20.xxxx
30.0000
30.5000
40.0000
45.0000
50.0000
55.0000
57.0000
60.0000
61.0000
62.0 79.0
Work Description
Field Direct Costs
Demolition work (E)
Asbestos removal (E)
Rehab of existing facilities (E)
Site Work
Piling
Concrete
Structural Steel
Platforms
Buildings
Major Equipment
Major Equipment setting
Agitators
Blenders
Emulsifier
Other equipment
Piping
Valves
Electrical
Instruments
Painting
Insulation
Fire Protection
Vendor Assistance
Other
Other Categories
80.xxxx
81.0000
82.0000
83.0000
84.0000
84.5000
85.0000
86.0000
87.0000
88.0000
Equipment Rental
Equipment Maintenance
Small Tools
Consumables
Commissioning / Start up activities
Other
90.xxxx
91.0000
92.0000
93.0000
93.5000
94.0000
94.0500
95.0000
96.0000
96.2000
96.5000
97.0000
98.0000
99.0000
99.5000
99.6000
99.7000
100.0000
101. -199.
200. 500
700. - 1000
The actual cost data information (the raw data), what it actually cost.
Related information regarding specific productivity / difficult conditions, down time
related to weather conditions or strikes, special construction equipment used,
shift work and any overtime work, this second category can assist in explaining
why certain costs / benchmarks are high compared to industry standards, there
may be a reason that our benchmark for installing pipe is 25% above industry
norms, fabricated at site using overtime to play catch-up.
11
This data should be categorized by the type of facility it is, i.e. Sulfur Recovery Unit,
Amine Plant and Research Laboratory expansion etc, location, union, non union or merit
shop, revamp or new work, this plus the collection of magazine articles, cost data books
and any technical papers. This data collection will greatly enhance the companys capital
estimating tools and could give the company a competitive advantage in the future. Prior
to the commencement of the capital cost estimate effort it is essential that a estimating
plan / responsibility matrix is established together with the crucial dates of when key
estimating related activities need to be completed. The cost estimator / engineer should
play an important roll / part in the site investigation effort, he or she should become
cognizant with the scope of work, potential make-up of the bid package(s), drawings,
specifications, general conditions (preliminaries) and bidding instructions and the
estimate / proposal due date. Prior to commencing the site investigation and in order that
they can appropriately communicate actual physical conditions to other individuals
involved with the capital cost estimating / proposal / engineering effort. Inestimable cost
related items in a new or revamp CAPEX E.P.C. project are not incorporated or
mentioned in the scope of work statement, specifications or indicated on the drawings,
(just think about were are the in-directs mentioned, were is the construction equipment
spelled out, were is the freight and vendor assistance documented many times its not)
these work items are however required in the execution of the project, it is the cost
estimators / cost engineers charge to ensure all these countless items are scoped out
evaluated / estimated and incorporated into the completed CAPEX estimate. As you
would expect all costs related scope of items must be painstaking considered /
estimated and included in the final CAPEX estimate.
To be consistent from one project to the next a detailed capital cost estimating checklist
is indispensable and crucial for this ongoing work effort. It is suggested that the cost
estimator / engineer utilize this list as a starting point and future tool in developing an all
encompassing capital cost estimate and as a means for extracting the intent / definition
that is indicated / depicted in the scope of work, drawings and specifications. The
subsequent checklist should provide a roadmap to the cost estimator / engineer in
assessing the cost values / budgets and allowances needed for capital engineering /
construction related project(s). Using this list and possibly taking it to the proposed
project site should prove beneficial, as mentioned before the cost engineer / estimator
should were possible visit the proposed site and endeavor to make a video tape
recording / or as a minimum take photographs to supplements notes and a condition
assessment of the project site and make detailed sketches of general areas when
photography is not allowed as is sometimes the case.
Items to research and check on at the site include
12
It is the Cost Estimators / Cost Engineers role to ensure that the following activities are
compiled prior and during the capital cost estimating effort.
1. Compile a list of work to be estimated, by W.B.S or by possible bid package.
2. Gather / collect all related engineering deliverables / estimating data, i.e. major
equipment, piping, instrumentation lists, drawings, specifications and any as-built
drawings etc.
3. Determine which work elements will be sub contracted. (This will many times
need the guidance / input of senior management)
4. Determine all direct / indirect cost items.
5. Consider profit / mark up / contingency / risk items.
6. Consider the establishment of the basis of estimate, i.e. exclusions and
qualifications.
The following list includes numerous topics / items / questions. The list is not intended
to be complete, consider it a work in progress, that should be added to on a regular
basis, or every couple of years.
Project Unique Conditions
Environmental Issues
Specifications / Codes
14
How many days do we expect / need to estimate for work stoppage due to snow, rain
or heat.
What is the average depth of frost penetration, do we need to heat concrete in winter
months.
Purchase / get hold of city / state maps indicating overall major and minor roads,
railroads, ports and airports, does any temporary roads need to be constructed, do
they need to be removed at the conclusion of the CAPEX project.
Become aware of the population of each local town / get copies of local telephone
books, yellow pages, bring back to office if possible.
For site work / excavations, what types excavation equipment will be needed for
excavation and removal off site, how will equipment be transported to the site, will
we need to set up a maintenance shop on site to maintain and repair this
construction equipment?
Planking and strutting, will sheet piling / timber shoring be needed for deep trenches
and other deep excavations, were will surplus excavation go to, on site or an off site
location do tipping fees need to be evaluated.
Find out if any part of the site is a fill area. If this is the case, plot / grid out its
location and describe the type of fill required, existing or imported and were the
imported fill will it be obtained. If imported fill material is required, where is its
sources (borrow pit) located, what does it cost, do we have to set up a temporary
facility, does fill material need to be consolidated to high tolerances - 95%.
Look at geological and subsurface data (rock, water table, running sand,
underground foundations) contact local consultants if time permits, have 2 or 3 trial
pits dug to see initially what the soil characteristics are.
Be aware of the existing water run off / drainage system for the area.
Obtain the point of view of the local community to the project and future local
zoning project issues, are any new houses needed to house future operators.
Other industry / similar plants in the local area, converse with individuals associated
with these plants; find out what problems they encountered.
Environmental restrictions / environmental impact study are they required.
Cost out required permits, Local Township, Building, Elevator, Pollution control /
treatment requirements. Noise, State, Federal any other permits needed such as fire
marshal.
Consider any consequences of delays in obtaining local / state permits, this is a
major risk item that needs to be evaluated.
Brainstorm ideas related to alternative site location(s) in local area / adjacent or
closer to main highways and utility sources.
Will de-watering of the excavations be required, how would this be done.
Is engineered material / imported fill required, stone, crusher run, topsoil etc, will
water tankers / trucks be required to minimize dust on temporary / permanent paved
areas / roads.
15
Will a temporary construction sewer / drainage system be required, will this have to
be removed at project completion.
Get hold of minimum maximum temperature, rainfall, and snow averages by
month; this will impact the start date of deep excavations.
Is there any overhead electrical lines or other piping systems / structures that will
limit construction operations, i.e. cranes trucks and back hoes.
Are any on-site areas, office or storage areas vacant, can modify them into
temporary office locations; lay down, storage or pre-fabrication areas.
Is off-site storage required, bonded warehouses or marshalling area?
Are any unique facilities called for, for equipment / materials handling, i.e.
computerized bar coding.
Find out what the distance / transportation route is from existing public transportation
facilities, bus, railway, airport or port.
Is there any seasonal limitations / restrictions / holidays related to the construction
effort that will slow the construction effort down i.e. (snow / ice / rain / monsoon /
Chinese new year / hunting season etc.).
Is the existing capacity of harbors and other material handling facilities adequate,
can these facilities support the construction effort, or do we need to provide
additional cranes / forklift trucks / storage areas etc.
Are temporary / permanent access roads / airfields / railroads required, will they be
maintained, removed at project completion, when will they be installed, who will
install them contractor or owner.
What is the conditions of existing highways / roads / bridges / head clearances under
bridges / weight capacity of existing bridges / width of road etc, does any work need
to be done on these facilities that needs to be estimated.
Will we need to hire a large percentage of third country nations (TCNs) because the
local labor force lacks welding and electrical installation skills?
Do we need to establish temporary housing camps?
Will we need to establish a cafeteria / camp to feed the workers.
What are the safety requirements for the project (hard hats goggles)?
Will we need to bus the labor force to the jobsite?
Will we need to buy or rent vans and buses for the duration of the construction effort,
what about servicing of these vehicles.
Will we need to erect change rooms for the workers?
How will we handle small tools / consumables?
Make inquiries on the local economic environment with respect to projects effect on
wage rates and worker availability, are any other large construction projects planned.
Carry out a labor (skilled and unskilled) cost and availability evaluation, is this a
union construction project, obtain the names and location of union locals / halls in
this area, obtain copies of all current union agreements / obtain current hourly wage
rates / rate expiration dates, special working conditions, talk with local union
business manager. If this is an open shop construction project, determine the
prevailing wage structure in the local area by carrying out a labor market survey, can
we use merit shop contractors.
Meet up and thrash out with local contractors / state employment departments
construction skilled and non-skilled worker availability.
16
Weigh up worker commuting distance that may limit the hiring of qualified workers,
will per diem costs / travel expense is required, will transportation need to be
provided, i.e. vans or buses.
Is ample hotels / housing / rental property obtainable in local area for contractor
professional staff members and field construction force, do we need to pay per
diems / travel allowances etc to attract suitable workers.
Are any temporary / permanent road , bridges required for the construction effort?
Will we need to drill water wells, can we use river water during the construction
effort?
Will any established pipe / structural steel fabrication facilities be required, will these
be left behind for future facility operations?
Will we need to establish any fuel storage facilities for refueling construction
equipment?
Will we need to consider the purchase or rental of helicopters or fixed wing aircraft
during the construction effort?
Is there any likelihood for union / non union tribulations / sabotage between plant
operating personnel and the potential non union construction workforce, does
17
contractor need to establish a separate entry gate into the site, is this a right to
work state.
Are there any restricted / no go areas that the workforce can not enter (clean rooms,
manufacturing areas etc)
Is any winter / dust protection required, are temporary shelters, visqueen partitions,
special clothing required or specific weather / dust protection to the existing / new
facilities
Is the new project within an operating plant / facility, what special working necessities
/ practices are required, safety needs (hard hat, safety glasses, safety shoes), hot
work permits and weekly or random drug testing.
Communication requirements i.e. telephone / fax / internet / e-mail / walkie-talkies /
video conferencing.
Will there be a need for helicopters or fixed wing aircraft.
Will there be any problems mobilizing equipment onto the job site i.e. pipe racks,
gates, port / ocean logistics, width of roads, bridges height / length of equipment,
overhead electric lines, fence removal etc.
Will temporary foundations, hard standings be required for heavy lifting equipment
(gin poles).
What construction equipment will the contractor provide, should we hire / consider
local equipment or will contractor owned equipment be utilized.
Identify unique types of construction equipment the contractor must supply, barges;
pipe bending equipment, orbital-welding machines, concrete pumping, slip forming
equipment etc.
Will construction related equipment maintenance / repairs be handled in on-site, how
will this be handled.
Will we need to establish concrete batching g plant (silos. mixer etc)?
Will full time / part time security / guard force be required, or can we utilize the
owners guard force.
Will there be a need for a full time safety engineer / manager.
How will we estimate the field office administration staff, together with copies,
drawings, telephones, faxs, furniture and stationary?
Will construction staff / workforce be exposed to toxic harmful / chemicals / materials,
how will this be handled.
18
Will special protective clothing / equipment / training be required at the site during
the construction effort?
Will fire watchmen / protection be required during the construction effort or during
shut downs
Will TV monitoring / security fencing be required during the construction effort, will
work force be subject to drug testing.
Medical support will it be required (doctor / nurse / first aid staff) at the construction
site, full time or part time.
Does the cost of medical facilities, school(s), training facility, commissary etc. need
to be included in the cost estimate?
questions that should be raised include, (a) were should the detailed design be
completed, can it be completed locally, should we consider the least expensive
engineering location, i.e. Indian, Venezuela or China, (b) were should the
procurement effort be in North America / Western Europe or (c) in host country or
adjacent country.
4. Appropriateness and availability, together with the cost of expatriate TCNs / local
personnel, and of local qualified skilled labor.
5. Bulk and engineered materials / major equipment were will we obtain these materials
and major equipment items.
6. Host Government political agenda, rules and import / export regulations. Does host
country impose / mandate local purchasing requirements.
7. Exchange rates / fluctuations in currencies, banking regulations, bank transfer rules,
payment terms and conditions, is bid to be expressed in US dollars or in local
currency.
8. Understand the countries local economy / engineering, construction contracting
methods and practices.
9. Be aware of labor productivity Vs North America and Western Europe, i.e.
productivity could be anywhere from 2 to 3 times the US Gulf coast.
10. Imported or domestically produced major equipment, QA / QC issues, plus a whole
host of other issues, and last but not least the size of the contingency fund and how
it will be expended.
11. Local taxes, import duties, sales tax, VAT taxes, B & O taxes and local tariffs.
12. Local country incentives, tax holidays, low cost loans and local inducements /
incentives.
13. Government monitoring / special documentation.
14. Availability of U.S. Government investment insurance or other ones such as
COFACE the French equivalent.
15. Are there any anti-trust / trade restriction practices currently in effect.
It is prudent to be on reasonably familiar terms with the history, key events and general
background of the specific country and the proposed CAPEX project, this will hopefully
smooth the progress of better public relations and enhance understanding by the local
populace. By being on familiar terms with the countrys potential industries / business /
growth prospects will many times enhance current and future forecasting, estimating,
planning and future potential work. The strategic planning / risk tolerance and the
decision to invest / pursue work in a specific overseas country is typically made by
corporate management, any related venture / investment costs should were possible be
incorporated into future proposals / capital cost estimates to recover this overhead /
development set up cost. Perform a detailed market research of the targeted country
prior to establishing a presence. Developed countries (1st and 2nd world nations) usually
contain the basic infrastructure (roads, harbors, airports, telecommunications services
etc,) necessary to support a new capital project, while less developed countries (3rd
world) lack this basic infrastructure (lack of major roads, harbors, water, electricity etc),
an understanding of this situation and the logistics of working through these problems
coupled with the financial ramifications of this situation needs to be fully understood and
valued and incorporated into the business start up costs or proposal / future capital cost
estimating efforts.
While constructing or functioning in an overseas country, care must be taken to fully
conform (learn the rules and play the game) to local regulations / bureaucracy and
practices, business procedures and applicable country laws. Underdeveloped countries
20
(Third World Countries) of which there are many, i.e. some countries in Africa, Asia and
South America, many times these projects must in many ways be self-reliant /
autonomous. Many times it is very beneficial to conduct a pre-estimating / proposal
survey to establish if qualified suppliers, vendors and contractors are available locally
and what materials, major equipment must be imported into the country / or fabricated in
the country and what are the requirements to do this action. To have a successful
project the project team should have a reasonable knowledge of the local contracting
traditions / customs and business practices. Transferring staff overseas for an extensive
duration will necessitate some essential front-end training. Each and every staff member
is not appropriate for an overseas project assignment; each potential applicant should
be conscientiously evaluated / considered and equipped / trained for his or her foreign
country work assignment. A lot of countries have fashioned / formed economic links /
associations or have profitable / commerce amalgamations such as the European Union
(25 + countries), NAFTA, ASEAN, etc: Importation of goods, services, materials,
equipment and labor from inside the economic market area will be financially beneficial
than importing from the outside, due to no import duties / tariffs being levied. A number
of countries have a lot of public / religious holidays and additional officially authorized
vacation days, four to six weeks is not unusual in some European countries, i.e. Norway,
Sweden and Denmark, work ethic, productivity, sick time and a some what limited
appreciation / respect to practical completion / schedule compliance (it is difficult to
actually finish a project, it seems to drag on for ever) this should be considered and
understood when compiling the proposal / cost estimate. Serious consideration should
be given to importation of goods and services / customs clearance, paper work,
documentation and inspection QA /QC activities when compiling the cost estimate /
planning the schedule for engineering, procurement and construction, major equipment,
means of delivery equipment engineered and bulk materials delivery and ocean freight
logistics if required and insurance requirements, this freight item is many times
understated and is many times delayed, local customs officials are sticklers for original
/ certified forms, importation documents, importation certificates , bills of laden,
insurance coverage etc, getting this freight situation right will dramatically assist the
ongoing project execution effort.
Deciding on the appropriate employees for a foreign country project should be balanced
by the following important attributes:
Previous overseas experience and enthusiasm.
In depth job knowledge.
Age, an individual with at least 7 years hands on experience.
Rolled up sleeves attitude / ability to get things accomplished,
Being a team player, having the ability to get along with other team members.
Health status / ability to travel to various overseas locations
And current family situation.
The front-end investment cost to mobilize / de-mobilize an employee to a foreign location
is exceptionally high. In many cases it may be prudent to send third-country nationals
(TCNs), i.e. Indians, Egyptians, Turks etc, or to employ local citizens, these individuals
are much more cost effective. The challenges mentioned above will be significantly
enhanced in a country with an identical / similar ethnic mix, North American or W.
Europeans working in Europe or N. America, for example in the middle east this situation
may require, women to wear dresses / robes burka that cover all parts of the body in
public, women are many times not allowed be part of the workforce, divided / separated
21
living quarters, expatriates not being allowed to drive, separate dining facilities, and
different work schedules, such as working on Saturday and Sunday. Several religions
require their followers to dedicate more time to services than others. For instance, some
Moslems pray five to seven times a day some of these prayer times are in there normal
work day, in the middle east you will hear the call to prayer many times during the day
and you will observe a line of worshippers going to the mosque, many times a mosque
may need to be established at the construction site. Also in this part of the world it is
normal practice to take a two-three hour mid daybreak, and to work until 8:00 PM in the
evening. In addition, their holy day is observed on Friday. These situations must be
considered when compiling the proposal or capital cost estimate and when executing the
project. Time and again on an overseas project documentation / communications will be
in English, (English is considered the major business language) if this is the case there
is usually no extra cost to include in the capital cost estimate. Nonetheless, there are
situations were the project documentation / correspondence is conducted in two
languages, i.e. one side of a drawing will be in English the other side in the local
language, this adds costs to the project that must be established / estimated and
incorporated into the proposal / capital cost estimate. In some counties it will be required
to utilize the services of chauffeurs, again this cost will need to be established and
included in the capital cost estimate. Many countries have restrictions / limitations on
what can be imported into that country. This is done many times to protect the local
manufacturing community, an example of this is were the host country requires 80%
local produced materials and equipment, even though the local manufacturing
community can not produce this stipulated percentage.
The above items are not all encompassing, when compiling an international capital cost
estimate. The requisite to be able to speak / write in the local language should be based
on the persons assignment duration, title, and extent of interaction with the local
construction community and work force. Local language courses prior to and during the
project will assist the project by cultivating contact with local enterprises and the local
workforce, minimizing conflicts, optimizing cooperation and enhancement of project
productivity. The proposal / capital cost estimate for expatriate professional staff have
got to take account costs for acquiring and maintaining the following activities and
support services:
1. Entry visas and work permits and for the administration organization performing
this activity.
2. Medicals for staff and family members.
3. Insurance costs, medical, life, automobile.
4. Supervision / senior staff members.
5. Logistics, (trips back home) trips to other business locations.
6. Tax equalization U.S., and local country taxes.
7. Income tax exemption, use of big five accounting firms / support.
8. Business travel and emergencies trips back home.
9. Training expatriates and local staff.
10. Orientation costs / hand books / new hire meetings.
11. Regular / emergency medical treatment.
12. Home maintenance compensation.
13. Schooling for expatriate children.
14. Local transportation, company car, allowance or a low cost loan.
15. Furniture rental.
16. Completion bonus.
17. Local insurance costs.
22
23
duties, local VAT taxes and tariffs must be meticulously researched and
calculated. Current and forecast of project currency rates. Understand existing
and possible / altering customs rules / regulations.
3. Be conscious / cognizant of local customs, federal and local government
bureaucracy and business / construction methods and practices.
4. Ocean freight and insurances costs, inland transportation costs, the cost of fixed
wing aircraft, helicopters and the ongoing cost of operating this services may be
required and if this is the case the a budget will need to be established
5. QA/ QC requirements and testing agencies Lloyds of London, DNV etc.
6. Importation of specialized labor, i.e. stainless steel welders, instrumentation
mechanics use of TCNs such as Indians, Turks and Egyptians.
7. Specialized transportation requirements, large cargo planes / tugs and ocean
going barges.
8. Establishment of a concrete batch plant, together with appropriate transportation
equipment.
9. Importation of construction equipment, trucks, earth moving plant, specialized
welding equipment and the maintenance of this equipment.
10. Develop a genuine interest in local history, food, culture, and religion; dont get
into deep discussions on religion or politics or the merits of how things are done
in the North America or Western Europe.
11. Be a team member treat others as equals, socialize be friendly with the local
team members. Cultivate a good personal / business relationship with local
authorities and the local community.
12. Gain knowledge of and speak the countries language, this is greatly appreciated
by the locals.
Select the right staff and positive personnel management of this staff is one of the main
solutions to project success. If this can be accomplished correctly a large number of
other problems can be mitigated. International projects for all intents and purposes use
the same basic principals that are employed on North American domestic projects;
however some of the points raised above should be of help when compiling an overseas
estimate or bid.
24
SECTION A - 6
VALUE ENGINEERING / CHANGE ORDERS /
CLAIMS AND CONTINGENCY ISSUES
The fashionable phrase(s) that are bandied around and that are getting some mileage in the
EPC engineering / construction industry in the last five years include:
Cost containment.
Cost cutting.
Out-sourcing.
Right sizing.
Downsizing.
Value Engineering is about reducing unnecessary costs and expenditures. Think outside the
box, if you were spending $20 million on a new building and it was coming out of your pocket
you would have lots of questions, why are we doing this and why are we doing that, the focus
of Value Engineering is to get the most bang for your buck, while still getting an attractive,
functional, quality built facility, that is safe for the people working and visiting the facility.
Value Engineering is defined as a structured attempt at optimizing designed facility
configurations / size, design intent and needs, materials of construction, facility operations /
operating equipment, with the goal of providing the best facility possible while paying the
most economical price for the completed facility, at the same time of designing and
constructing the facility that meets the organizations, safety, reliability, maintainability, quality
and possibly future expansion goals.
There is an enormous pressure from both owner and EPC firms to contain costs. All these
terms mentioned above have connotations with the term - Value Engineering, the question is
can Value Engineering help in the engineering and construction process, usually the answer
is yes, if the detailed design effort is less than say 75% complete, then Value Engineering
can be a major help in maintaining and possibly reducing a CAPEX budget. Value
Engineering has evolved in the last thirty years it has become a last resort many times
when projects are about to go over there budgets; Value Engineering is basically a front-end
activity that result in real project related cost savings. Value Engineering is best summed up
as a methodical approach to providing an optimized design and construction solution(s),
without forfeiting quality, reliability and of course safety - without incurring unnecessary
additional cost(s), and of course in meeting the needs and expectations of the end use, a
good example of this is purchasing a car you could buy a Porsche at $70,000 or you could
buy a Ford Taurus at $20,000, both car will get you to were you need to get to, both cars are
safe and reliable, so it basically come down to personal preference, buy a Ford and save
$50,000, its your call.
Top five reasons for poor value in the construction industry:
1. Why change now we are making a profit. (The answer to this is that the company
could perhaps make more money by utilizing this concept).
2. Communications, the construction industry is plagued by lack of or mixed
communications, youve heard the old saying nobody told us. We were not in the
loop.
3. We have never done this before, engineers / construction workers are reluctant to
embrace new ideas and concepts, we could put ourselves out of a job.
4. Planning, nobody thought through at the beginning of the project, we never
considered the concept.
5. The perceived idea that there is not enough design data available at the early stage
the project
The fact of the matter is that any early mini value engineering session / brain storming
session (perhaps half a day focusing on the big ticket items at the early stage of a CAPEX
project can result in savings of perhaps as much as 5% or more.
Time and again when a capital project is in trouble, i.e. going over its budget the call will be
for Value Engineering it seems like this is the panacea that will cure the problem and many
times it will. However many projects just pay lip service to Value Engineering, they say they
do it on an ongoing basis, however if the conducted a formal 2 or 3 day Value Engineering
with all the key players, they could realize big CAPEX cost savings. Value Engineering is
best summed up as a systematic approach to providing an optimized design solution(s),
without incurring unnecessary cost, in meeting the needs of the end user. Value Engineering
is a function oriented systematic team approach used to analyze and improve value in a
product, facility design, system or service. The term value engineering is being used more
frequently in the construction industry. Value Engineering (V.E.) is an organized, across the
board review / practical team activity that is focused at the initial concept / preliminary
design of a specific project / manufacturing approach and to optimize the elements within the
total design deliverables package. The purpose of V.E. is to develop a new approach, better
/ optimized design that will generate the optimum life-cycle operating costs / afford the
maximum value at the same time as focusing all safety, economical, quality, operability,
maintainability, resilience, and other operating goals / criteria created and established for the
project / specific process. V.E. is applicable to,
Value Engineering (VE) is not engineering / design review or a cost reduction application.
Value Engineering is an innovative organized effort which analyses the needs of a CAPEX
project with the goal of reducing capital expenditures, expense related values, soft costs and
eventual operating costs. Value Engineering is additionally a most important instrument at
the outset of a project in developing / optimizing the concepts / designs to meet a specific
budget, V.E. is best when the design deliverables are in the 10% - 50% completion range.
The expression value engineering (V.E.) is many times allied with a project, manufacturing
process or product that is in its early development stage.
In contrast, the expression value analysis (V. A.) is interconnected to value evaluation /
review of a product that has been designed and is in its production / operating phase. Value
Engineering provides an incentive to the design team to search for cost effective design
choices, examples of this thought process include some of the following.
The term Value Engineering is related by way of the life-cycle costs of a building or other
related items, how long will the building remain in its production mode, what are the
operating costs, what are the costs associated with water, steam, electricity and
maintenance. Value Engineering is a positive money saving methodology / procedure that
needs to be presented to construction professionals (perhaps 20% - 40% of the construction
profession has been introduced to Value Engineering concepts) by an individual who has
significant hands on knowledge and education in this topic, a Certified Value Specialist (CVS)
would be a real plus or individuals that have conducted perhaps 10 plus V.E. studies. The
headlines of Value Engineering are described in the following brief write up, the basic
philosophy and steps that are outlined below are appropriate to all types of CAPEX
construction, attaining a basic appreciation of the concept / principals of V.E. can be
tremendously valuable to cost estimators / cost engineers, its another skill that they can offer
to there employers. Realizing and achieving optimum cost value / cost containment / profit
enhancement is a major goal(s) - objective of all estimators / cost engineers, it a good
feeling to bring real cost savings to a CAPEX project. The listings below are some types of
costs elements that are linked / allied to the construction process.
The V.E. group should be made up of personnel with different skill sets i.e. civil, mechanical,
electrical, project controls, purchasing, operations, safety etc. etc. to obtain an expansive
assortment of new concepts / ideas. The V.E. facilitator / leader should endeavor to set up a
date and location (2-3 days is the best duration for a V.E. study). The V.E. facilitator / leader
as well creates the agenda and the ground rules for the creativity / brainstorming discussions
and also presents the V.E. big picture i.e. (competitive environment issues, if this was your
money how would you spend it) including concepts and overall path forward, the V.E.
facilitator / leader should not be domineering or try to force pre-conceived concepts on the
team, he or she should be open to new ideas. Discussions should focus on topics such as
possible out-sourcing, value to the customer, cost cutting and cost synergies as they relate to
the overall concept of Value Engineering; discussions should focus on engineering,
procurement, construction, energy usage and future operating methods and costs.
The procedure to create a good number of brainstorming ideas is as follows (the more ideas
the better the V.E. savings in most cases).
1. The establishment of a well rounded / diverse team (10 20 individuals is about right
number for a two to four day V.E. / COM effort).
2. Identify the issues; describe project goals budget, major milestones and the current
project path forward (note this path forward can be modified to optimize the CAPEX
project).
3. No criticism / we all walk away from the session as professionals and friends.
4. Generate a receptive atmosphere, were here to help the CAPEX project and the project
team to be successful.
5. Encouragement of free wheeling off the wall thinking, what would be the benefits of
using a toller to make 60% of the products, this idea might cause so of the future
operators to be concerned, because it could eliminate jobs, but it needs to be raised.
6. Generation of a large quantity of brainstorming ideas is the secrete of success.
7. Use these ideas to create more value saving concepts; its like a snowball effect.
8. At the conclusion of the 2 3 day session, chart a path forward using these ideas to bring
value to the client. Set up a list of tasks, with dates, put names of individuals who are
responsible for coming up with a conclusion recommendation and a path forward.
The V.E. team participants should be at ease in articulating and considering any cost saving
idea that comes to mind, even if the concept / idea may perhaps happen to be outlandish to
the other participants, dont immediately dismiss it. The logic and rationale is that an
improbable - outlandish idea may be the light bulb that opens up Aladdins cave on future
cost savings. The phases of the V.E. process are as follows.
(A)
The current game plan sharing the design deliverables (drawings, SOW, cost
estimates, specifications, execution strategy) with the V.E. team, all project data /
information encompassing the project is pulled together and displayed on the walls of
the room in which the V.E. session is being conducted (an overhead projector is used
many times).
(B)
(C)
Set the stage and conduct what if scenarios, come up with diverse brainstorming
ideas spend at least 2 4 hours or more on this important topic. Remember the
more ideas the better results will most probably be realized.
(D)
Pick the best ideas assume 100 ideas were generated, select the best 30 ideas and
move forward with them this is the investigative / analytical phase.
(E)
Path Forward / Proposal / Formal Management Report. In this segment, the groups
suggestions are fine tuned / condensed for submittal to management, usually a round
table discussion many times is also be given indicating what needs to be done next /
action item list, who does what and when. The deliverables of the 2/3 day V.E.
session many times will be a detailed written report, 50 -100 pages, documenting
actions / possible concepts for saving CAPEX expenditures.
(F)
Auditing / Ongoing Monitoring / Follow-up phase revisit the action of the V.E.
session in 30 days or so to ensure that the agreed on actions have been completed
(or have been adopted).
Select the best manufacturing location; - perhaps at this time it is Eastern Europe,
South America or S.E. Asia or in an existing facility currently being used.
Consider manufacturing / process improvement, simplification and optimization
(KISS).
Ensuring correct / proven technology is chosen, why go with unproven technology.
Adapt and customize current company SOPs, standards and specifications to
optimize the future EPC effort to deliver the project to customer at the lowest cost,
while ensuring safety and quality of product matches or exceeds customers
requirements, consider using similar design deliverables from completed similar
CAPEX projects and modify them to this project application this could save
significant CAPEX expenditures if this approach can be utilized.
Issue early works packages to minimize future escalation costs.
Minimize disturbance at site and general work area (keep as tidy and as neat as
possible during the construction effort) were possible to minimize disruption and a
general loss in productivity.
HVAC systems on any new facility typically are major cost drivers, consider ways of
reducing HVAC costs, by use of different equipment / components, double / triple
glazing, tinted glass, heat pumps, cogeneration, energy management systems and
any other issues that could save initial capital and future operating costs.
Consider modular / pre-assembly construction methods.
Consider generating onsite electricity, i.e. solar, cogeneration or wind power.
Review backup redundant utility systems and question engineering philosophy.
Consider different architectural finishes and installation methods.
Consider using gravity feed tanks housed in building, Vs dedicated tank farm
(eliminate pumps / pipe / pipe racks).
Increase / Decrease bay sizes, floor to floor heights, optimize support space.
Use aluminum switchgear if this is feasible.
Optimize automation methods and endeavor to reduce number of I/O points were
possible.
Use energy efficient equipment that conserves electricity, gas and water.
Elevate facility building pad, to reduce excavation costs (cut and fill requirements).
Locate facility / building closer to existing WWT, power and steam production facilities
to save on pipe and cable runs.
Plan flexible workspace for future visitors; provide hotel types work space areas.
Use timers, dimmers and set HVAC thermostats to specific set points to reduce
electricity usage and optimize were possible.
Use natural daylight / windows / skylights in an effort to optimize electrical load.
Re-visit building insulation designs; consider best / optimum R value for walls and
roofing systems.
Re-route new or existing roads / rail spur to save construction costs and schedule,
locate new facility close to existing services if possible, to save on piping and
electrical runs.
Can we optimize future long term operating (OPEX) expenditures, by reducing
number of operators?
Discuss with local utility / Power Company on ways to optimize electrical usage to
save operating costs.
Use cost effective materials such as PVC, CPVC versus high cost alloys.
Design facility / building with sufficient employee parking space; be cognizant of local
transport needs / bus stops / bike racks / unloading areas / handicap buses / van
access and the general location of access roads to the new facility.
Utilize used equipment / refurbished equipment / use pre-purchased equipment
currently in owners inventory, purchase key spare parts with initial P.O.
Consider future facility production / campaign increases and decreases to meet
market demand and design to needed capacity / demand, can this plant be modified
and expanded to increase future production needs.
Conduct mini - V.E. sessions during pre-construction reviews / input from construction
engineers during the detailed design effort to optimize the EPC effort.
Plus many more cost saving ideas.
Cost Optimization Methods (COM) and value enhancement approaches: A number of leading
process -, chemical, manufacturing, oil and gas, pharmaceutical organizations have put into
practice the application of a suite of Cost Optimization Methods (COM) and value
enhancement approaches to optimize their CAPEX capital project executions programs, this
activity relates to front end planning, engineering, procurement, construction and eventual
facility operations. This is basically an upgrade to the Value Engineering concept were the
total scope of a CAPEX project is re-evaluated to see if additional costs can be squeezed
out of the current scope of work. Cost Optimization Methods (COM): A front end project
practice targeted at optimizing hard and soft Engineering, Procurement and Construction
project related costs. (COM) practices are intended to enhance the value / worth of a
manufacturing / production facility by reducing critical and non-critical scope of work items, by
improving reliability and simplifying the manufacturing / production process. Topics that are
reviewed and evaluated include in this methodology are: (1) Front End Economic / Business
drivers, (2) Early and detailed Engineering / Design activities, (3) Procurement methods and
approach to be used in completing the CAPEX project, (4) Construction techniques, (5)
Project related soft costs, such as Start up costs, Owner Engineering / Construction
support, Validation costs, F, F & E and Operating costs. Cost Optimization Methods (COM)
and value enhancement approaches, to be performed during the following CAPEX estimating
efforts:
#
50% accuracy)
Viability / Business
Identification - PreDetailed Design
Estimate Feasibility
Estimate, partial AFE /
Initial Funding
Estimate (+/ - 40%
accuracy)
Funding Estimate
Approve for
Expenditure (Full or
partial CAPEX funding
) Semi-Detailed
Estimate, Preliminary
Control Estimate, AFE
Full Funding Estimate
(+/ - 30% accuracy)
Project Baseline /
Project Control Class
(used as control tool)
Project Control
Estimate, GMP
Estimate, A Not to
Exceed Estimate (+/ 10% accuracy)
Lump Sum - Hard
Money / Lump Sum
Proposal Estimate (+/ 5% accuracy)
The (COM) approach should be considered as a work in progress list of planned, well
thought out historical best practices, that encompass the entire CAPEX projects scope, COP
when adopted can bring enhanced value to the completed facility. The following is a listing of
these best value practices that should be considered during a CAPEX projects execution
cycle. (These concepts have worked successfully in the past and there is no reason why they
should be appropriate in the future). The five main features of Cost Optimization Methods
(COM) are to financially enhance each facility by optimizing the following.
(1) Improving Cost Performance the final cost of the facility - compared to the approved /
allocated CAPEX funds.
(2) Optimize the Completion Schedule / Facility Start-Up Vs original planned start-up.
(3) The Facility Life Cycle / Facility Function, (i.e. 15 20 years or possibly more life cycle).
(4) Enhance the facilities Manufacturing / Production performance.
(5) Perfect the facilities safety record (during construction and facility operations).
These applications are appropriate to the following related projects
The following 80 concepts / applications focus primarily on Manufacturing, Refinery, and HiTech type CAPEX projects, similar considerations and concepts should be considered and
developed for other non-process related construction projects listed above.
Ref #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Can we manufacture / produce the end product in a different more cost effective
way? Have we fully explored all of the manufacturing options available? Are the
manufacturing requirements to restrictive or disproportionate?
Can we utilize an existing facility / building is there room at an existing operating
facility that could partially or fully meet the needs of the future CAPEX project?
Does this CAPEX project align and support the companys 5 10 year strategic
business plan and goals: Does this CAPEX project deliver long term financial
and manufacturing benefits and product flexibility to the business?
Will the execution of this CAPEX project improve the organizations overall
supply chain and manufacturing flexibility.
Outsourcing / Third Party Manufacturing / Contract Manufacturing: Have we fully
considered the manufacturing outsourcing option and determine if this is or a
combination of third party manufacturing is the best path forward.
Have we considered producing this product with a joint venture partner perhaps
in there facility? What is the best physical location for this future CAPEX project,
North America, South America, Europe or Asia? Were do we expect future
market growth for this particular product?
Re-visit basic CAPEX Investment drivers, examine (business case) subject
matter / market research and return on investment decisions; does the business
case make sense considering the global economic downturn? Determine if this is
the best utilization of companys capital expenditure funds (CAPEX) at this time,
is this a business that the organization wants to be in, in ten years, or are new
competitors chasing after this market, is there a sustained future for this product,
would it be prudent to delay the go decision until the economy stabilizes.
Manufacturing / Process Optimization. Consider reduction of redundant CAPEX
investment (manufacturing / production equipment use less equipment if
possible, re-size equipment if possible, combine equipment), this could possibly
have a knock on effect for future operations / maintenance, product wastage
and minimizing operator headcount personnel and costs.
Can we coalesce and piggyback / de-bottleneck off current manufacturing /
production steps and possibly save CAPEX expenditures?
Can future CAPEX project attract any State / Governmental financial assistance
grants, free real estate, infrastructure improvements, tax breaks, tax holidays,
training assistance or any financial benefit that could improve the ROI, etc?
Have we conducted a Risk Evaluation / Mitigation Study: compile list of project
risks and develop ways of reducing risk with the CAPEX projects stakeholders.
Is the manufacturing technology proven, or is the CAPEX project based on new /
unproven technology, if new technology is to be utilized does the CAPEX project
estimates reflect this situation both from a financial and schedule viewpoint.
Re-examination of manufacturing / support systems, review logic of reducing
manufacturing equipment / support systems, including maintenance / out of
service time, consider outsourcing the maintenance effort if feasible.
Can electricity, steam etc be obtained from a nearby source / third party? Is it
more cost effective to produce our own electricity via a co-gen plant? Should we
handle our waste water, or does it make economic sense to ship offsite.
Does facility need to be state of the art from a process controls point of view, or
can we save CAPEX costs by additional operators?
Can the manufacturing process, packaging operation be optimized by perhaps
outsourcing various production steps to a contract manufacturer?
Is the CAPEX project execution team cognizant of all the perceived project risks
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
and issues, have these challenges been described to the team members.
Does CAPEX project have a critical drop dead date is it tied to a regulatory
decree / market entry date that are driving this effort.
Can the overall Engineering, Procurement and Construction delivery effort be
improved?
Engineering / Detailed Design Considerations
Can we utilize manufacturing equipment currently owned and in storage / or not
being utilized by company? Can we use any design work that has been
completed in the last five years, instead of starting from scratch.
Consider concurrent engineering and equipment / services standardization.
Construction quality issues (QA/QC) over specified, make sure facility is not
over designed, consider what our competitors are doing in there EPC efforts.
Do we need detailed customized specifications or can we optimize the
specifications we currently have and cut and paste to this project application.
Specifications and procedures specific to facilities can fluctuate significantly as
an example a warehouse does not need comprehensive (full blown)
specifications could it be built using the Design / Build approach, however a
state of the art R & D center will need to have detailed specifications, the trick is
to not fall back into the old mode we have always done it this way,
specifications and construction practices need to be reviewed every couple of
years, to squeeze out unnecessary requirements and features ( a large chemical
company use to have 20 + volumes of specifications and procedures, after a
careful review it was found that they could build facilities using five volumes, this
saved a lot of paperwork and significant administration and construction costs.
Design cost effective offsite / support systems: Locate new facility as close as
possible to boiler plant, cooling towers, sub station and other main services /
utilities. Ensure good judgment is used in the selection of manufacturing / utility
equipment to ensure minimum ongoing operating costs and down time.
Use Industry Standards / Methods: Utilize off the shelf generic specifications /
standards and construction methods that are customized to the actual
construction need and not above and beyond to the requirements of the project,
use standard industry specifications (Construction Specification Institute - CSI
standard specifications would be a good example of this if possible).
Upgrade / Retrofit / Modernize existing company owned facilities: Can the
proposed CAPEX project be shoehorned into an existing facility, possibly
saving significant CAPEX expenditures and resources? Or can we purchase an
existing facility that can be reconfigured to the CAPEX projects needs.
Can we buy the Engineering and Procurement effort from a more cost effective
country? I.e. Eastern Europe (Poland, Greece or Hungary), or S.E. Asia. (India
or Indonesia).
Architect Engineering (A/E) Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC)
Firm selection: Decide on the most experienced and cost effective A/E - EPC
firm; consider future long term alliance relationships and future partnering.
Use Best / Appropriate Manufacturing Technology: Consider new
manufacturing technology were appropriate, however consider the learning
curve if new technology is selected and the associated start up difficulties
typically encountered with pioneer type CAPEX projects. Seeking out and won
over to new manufacturing technology can be time consuming effort, ensure
process guarantees are inserted into any purchase order specific to new
manufacturing equipment. Determine if different / proven manufacturing process
10
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
11
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
12
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Review bonding requirements are they really needed? Review project insurance
needs; make sure there are no overlap / over coverage related to the total
projects insurance requirements (BAR, Umbrella, OSI, All risk, General Liability).
Check status of various taxes (VAT, Sales Tax, Business & Occupation Taxes
B & O and any other applicable taxes) Check if these taxes are applicable, does
company have a sales exception certificate, can VAT be recovered.
Payment terms / Contractual issues (extended warranty, retention, process
guarantees) Consider less onerous payment terms, 30 45 days is the norm,
consider modifying contractual issues that impact the final cost.
Construction / Execution Considerations
Permits construction / environmental / various will they impact completion of the
CAPEX project.
Select the most experienced and cost effective Construction Management firm to
support / direct the construction effort.
If fast track construction methods are to be exercised does CAPEX budget have
adequate monies for shift work, overtime, week end working, has productivity
loss been considered, have additional monies been added to the Preliminaries /
Division 1 budget.
Are there any issues related to union or open shop labor work rules and
precedents that need to be addressed.
Is there an ample labor supply in the immediate area to successfully complete
this CAPEX project?
Demolition / Removal of Hazardous Waste Materials (asbestos, PCBs, lead
paint and mold) consider most timely and cost effective method of demolition
and removal from site. Do we need to provide temporary offices ad maintain
them for current operating staff? Can we obtain a credit for scrap metal or used
process equipment?
Take into account the use of off-site construction i.e. Modularization / Skid
Mounted Pre-Assemblies / Piping / Modular walls / Structural components / Pre
Cast Concrete / Pre assembled control rooms.
Project related Soft Cost Considerations
How can we optimize and minimize the CAPEX projects Soft costs i.e. A/E
fees, CM fees, Owner staff costs, travel costs, Owner CM inspection. Validation
costs, Plant assistance costs, start up costs, initial start up materials costs,
commissioning costs. Establish not to exceed budget that need senior
management approval for over runs.
Furniture, fixtures and equipment excluded these cost from capital budget,
consider perhaps as an operating costs.
Ditto for warehouse equipment / shelving / fork lifts and packers.
Facility Operating Considerations
How can we reduce operating costs and operator headcount?
Are there any ways to reduce inventory / reduce storage time 30 days to 15 days
/ reduce warehouse footprint size.
Can we lease required gas storage and similar necessary materials etc from a
3rd party?
How can we optimize our utility costs?
Consider ways of optimizing raw material optimization.
Could we use a 3rd party to package finished products?
How can we optimize the energy needs of the facility?
Consider establishing one or two centralized global spare parts warehouse(s) for
13
The VE / COM effort never fails to produce real savings (both financial and time)
specific to CAPEX projects.
Provides value to the end user / customer and it also assist in the early planning
effort:
Creates an audit trail / documenting savings, ideas can be used in future CAPEX
applications.
Brings into focus cost saving concepts with the highest potential cost impact, it is not
just focused on construction, operating costs can be optimized:
Reduces CAPEX projects cost by generating ideas that save money while
maintaining design intent.
Typical VE / COM meeting / study takes 2 3 days, with a detailed follow up report
issued 2 weeks later.
Typical number of participants that attend VE / COM session is 10 20, these people
come from the Owners organization (Management and Operations), the EPC
companies Project Management, Engineering, Procurement, Construction, Project
Controls (Estimating and Planning).
Documents used in the V.E. study, scope of work, execution philosophy, latest
drawings, P&IDs, latest cost estimate.
Set the stage Project Manager describes project goals, project execution / schedule
and cost.
Understand project V.E. group needs to understand the technical scope of the
project by asking questions.
Create improvement ideas - V.E. group generates cost savings or project
enhancement / improvement ideas.
14
Evaluate and selection of best ideas - V.E. group participates and votes on these
ideas. V.E sub groups develop cost savings from best ideas.
Develop a path forward Assign responsibility and timing needs to individuals to
compete outstanding V.E. items
15
Analysis of a construction claim: the following is a listing of the steps that should be taken to
pulling together a claim or change order;
1. Identify issue / dispute (overview).
2. Identify / collect more (appropriate) data, timesheets, invoices; e-mails etc i.e.
relevant details that will be needed to support the documentation requirements.
3. Analysis schedule impact, compare to original program.
4. Determine cost of change or claim (collect relevant cost data).
5. Prepare interim and final cost impact of change / claim.
6. Inform relevant parities of cost impact.
The contracting parties (Owner / Engineering firm / Construction Company and a host of
sub contractors and suppliers)) must be able to provide a timely written notice, together
with documentation of the cost and schedule impact of the potential / pending change
order(s). The main goal of all parties is to construct the plant / facility to the agreed price /
quality at the promised / stipulated completion date outlined in the original engineering /
or construction contract. The topic of change orders and claims on any construction
project can cause both serious personal (confrontational) problems and possibly
significant budget overruns for all parties involved in the project construction process.
This topic more than any others in the construction industry perhaps causes the most
conflict between the project team players, due to the fact that change orders and claims
typically run in the 2.5% to as much as 10% of the original total install cost (T.I.C.) of the
project, people many times taken change orders and claims as a personal affront. The
intent of this section is to propose a straightforward / path forward standard for
implementing change orders and claims and to assist in supporting enhanced conformity
among clients / owners, engineers, architects and contractors. (The project team the
individual involved in the construction process), and to gain acquiescence (buy-in) of this
standard as a series of steps (in some ways similar to the four-step estimating approach
described in section A 2) which will help construction professionals when faced with this
vexing problem of change order(s) and claim preparation, submission and eventual
resolution.
A change order (refer to section A 2 for a detailed description) is written / verbal formal
request contractual instruction usually compiled and issued following the execution
(signing) of the construction contract to the contractor, signed / authorized by the
individual named / nominated in the contract (the owners representative / project
manager). This is the individual authorized to act for the owner the individual who
coordinates and instruct the contractor to proceed with the performance of the work /
change order (the individual who approves monthly pay requests, many times an
Architect / Owners Representative / Project Manager / Clerk of the Works. Like in other
industries there are always divergence of opinion / execution practices on how to proceed
with change orders, (push them away, leave them till the end of the project etc) the best
way to handle them is to resolve them when they show up and get them approve and out
of the way Change orders and claims are a fact of life. A Change Order is contractual
document requesting a scope modification or variation; a written (formal) change made
by the client / architect / engineer to the contract drawings or specifications or completion
date. By and large, a change order must be agreed by the owner / client and the
engineer / contractor prior to it becoming a legal modification to the contract, if the Owner
refuses to approve a change order it usually ends up as the basis of a claim.
16
17
Construction equipment / downtime / idle period this could be part of the change order
/ claim because they are at the site longer than originally planned.
Additional travel expenses / subsistence costs.
Additional home office support to order equipment and materials.
The following basic cost items / terms are involved with the vast majority of all change orders
and claims.
The modification / cost and time adjustment in contract price and completion date as a rule
is discussed initially and informally between the parties to the contract, the contractor will
many times accept an agreed to lump sum cost to perform the extra work, with a project
time extension, (this is the best option) on some occasions the parties will agree to complete
the work on a cost plus (time and materials / in U.K. and Europe this is known as Day work
basis) this is another good solution the work continues to get done. The fundamentals /
basics of direct and indirect construction project related costs have a wide definition
(meanings to various constructional professionals); it is typically these issues and meanings
/ definitions of these terms which are the top of the list / focal point of change order
problems / arguments / disputes. Direct costs are the costs of the permanent materials
(major equipment, engineered materials and bulk materials), construction equipment, labor
and subcontracted work elements that are permanent features of the finished construction
project, which can be unmistakably recognized and assigned as a permanent asset. To
create an satisfactory data base / understanding of this topic, it is required to recognize and
list the fundamental basics of direct and indirect project construction specific costs (the
following list attempts to itemize the major elements), it is left to the estimator / cost engineer
to select which category the specific cost element should be assigned to. Hourly wage rates
for various craft skills / laborers, payroll taxes, F.I.C.A. payroll fringe benefits, social security
taxes, health & welfare contributions / applicable industry training funds, builder all risk
insurance, wrap around insurance, apprenticeship training, industry advancement (union
applications), tool allowance, travel costs / allowances, pension contributions (may not be
applicable) excused absence, public holidays etc, indirect labor on and off site, construction
equipment / rental (backhoes, welding machines mob, demob costs etc.), specialist
subcontract work (typically painting, roofing, siding, electrical etc.), permanent and
temporary materials (bulks / engineered) small tool cost (picks, drill bits, saws) project
related insurance (BAR), project office supplies project consumables, grease, rags, welding
rods and gases etc. telephone / fax communication costs, postage express mail, blue print
machine, copying machines, permits, performance bonds, temporary services and facilities,
clean-up costs, NDT testing of materials, temporary facilities, sheds and toilets etc.
18
19
momentum is many times lost or diluted, it is possible that this will cause field mistakes / re
work and knock on delays which can be very costly to correct. Extreme weather conditions
(hot or cold) impacts labor productivity, examples could include storms, significant snow /
frost, heavy rainfall, high winds. Concrete, paint, drywall etc may not be installed in
temperatures lower than 32 degrees F; heated aggregate, potable heaters, temporary
partitions etc may be required; of course this has a cost consequence. Effect that change
orders have on any bonus / penalty provisions or liquidated damages, should be carefully
considered, why should the contractor lose out on a bonus just because the owner has
issued a change order. Will the change order work be completed in the later stages of the
project, will this impact labor and material costs, i.e. inflation, the materials and labor costs
will most probably be more than originally bid, will the work be carried out in winter months,
what impact will this mean, temporary heat, partitions and potential loss of productivity.
Increased costs / cost escalation / inflation: When a new change order delays completion of
the project, the additional costs of labor (increased wage rates), material, construction
equipment and sub-contract work should be calculated and included with the change order
value. Contract end date / time extension (additional Division 1 Costs / Preliminaries) each
change order should be evaluated and estimated pragmatically (endeavor to capture all the
cost items) and managed on a case by case basis to safeguard the current project / contract
end date (or extended completion date). Fast tracking / accelerating the completion date
could affect a decreased production rate / productivity / efficiency; a larger labor force may be
required together with additional supervision. An authorized time / schedule extension (i.e. 1
week or 1 month) will typically produce extra project related overhead costs, the site
establishment and the site staff will need to be at the site that additional period of time, this
cost will need to be established by the contractor and passed onto the owner via a change
order or claim. A change order producing a delay to the basic contract completion date will of
course impact the construction project with additional costs to the Contractor (direct and
indirect costs including H.O. and any loss of future potential profit). These above and beyond
the current project related costs should be recognized (fully scoped out) collected and
(estimated) priced out and included in the new change order value together with a time
extension (if necessary) and presented to the owner. Acceleration activities, contractor is
requested to accomplish a greater amount of work in a shorter time period, overtime, loss of
productivity, supervision are typically associated with this situation. Partial facility acceptance
occupancy or partial / staged transfer / partial start up of facility. When a change order delays
completion of the project, this particular situation could result in the work being carried out
after an area section / floor of the facility is occupied by the owners staff, security restrictions
in specific areas, protection of (owner supplied fixtures / equipment) furniture, fixtures,
equipment, inventory, noise, intrusion of owners employees / customers, dust protection and
schedule issues could negatively impact worker attitude / productivity. Finance costs and any
bank charges should be part of the change order or claim if the contractor in fact pays them.
Rescheduling caused by change orders may postpone the completion and hand over of the
project this may cause additional costs to the contractor by having to finance the project for a
longer period of time than originally estimated / anticipated, retention funds could be with
held for longer periods of time, this could also mean additional insurance premiums.
Temporary protection of completed construction work: (Protection of previously completed
work with tarpaulins, temporary heat, temporary partition etc). In certain shift work situations,
auxiliary weather protection materials / heating / support systems may be required
(salamanders / gas bottles, plus the labor to maintain and control this activity etc). Given that
both shifts will be working on the same construction effort, there will be a specific
ineffectiveness in the hand over from one shift to the next. The new crew will have to go
through a learning curve with the work completed by the earlier shift. In view of the fact that
both shifts use the same gear, tools and construction equipment, many times they will be in
20
different locations. Overtime / shift work - grave yard (night work) versus normal daytime
work, in view of the fact that the extra shift will be performed at night, ordinary light will not be
on hand, temporary electric lighting will have to be made available / maintained, watchmen
and perhaps[s other labor costs could be part of this activity. Typically temperature / weather
conditions at night are more difficult to work, temporary heating could be required to allow
paint / concrete to cure properly. Site management / field supervision shortages / restrictions
(Additional site staff for short durations to complete the change order work): Construction
field activities required and linked with the integration of a change order work and the work of
the basic / original contract may entail a dilution / digression of supervisory attention from the
original / basic contract work. At the same time as the project manger is evaluating the
change order, man power loading craft workers, inquiring ordering / purchasing the additional
major equipment, bulk materials, construction equipment and specialized sub contractors
resources etc. Field progress / labor productivity on the original / basic contract could be
negatively impacted both from a cost and schedule point of view. Field supervision will be
thinned out, because the existing supervisory staff must be extended over a number of
different work shifts, makes the coordination difficult, as to work completed, whats next,
ordering of materials, deliveries, field orders, imagine the logistics of doing slip forming on a
major high rise building, this is the sort of coordination that may be required. Successfully
coordinating some or all of the above with the above issues should help facilitate the
contractor to establish accurately the cost of executing the work that is necessary in
completing the change order collecting the relevant data and putting it on paper is the
secrete of success, thought must be given to the knock-on effect of the specific change order
will have upon the total execution of the total project, it can sometimes work to the
contractors advantage to get a number of change orders and many times it will depended on
the sophistication of the owner and his or hers knowledge of the construction process on how
this will all work out. The construction industry in the twenty first century is more multifaceted
and complicated than ever before. The quantity of issues concerned in executing even minor
projects can be daunting, causing planning and scheduling to be difficult to say the least
creating schedule stoppages. As a result, every contractor will be faced with delays, at the
same time this delay / stoppage is the usually the responsibility of another party working on
the project and puts the contractor in jeopardy to disrupt the customary operating methods /
proceedings and impact the expect return on investment / profit margin, if this is the case the
contractor will be obliged to issue a documented delay claim to the owner. The subsequent
list of issues may impact productivity when work is performed on a shift work basis.
Additional hard standings / special scaffolding needs / requirements, barricades, fences and
the subsequent rental, erection and dismantling, having to prepare outside areas with stone /
sleepers, etc for scaffolding support could result in additional costs incurred by the
contractor. Extra support staff / additional logistical support: (Both H.O. and field staff)
Difficulties can come about because of problems in ordering, purchasing and delivery of
major equipment, bulk materials and construction equipment, to site etc., due to a new
change order, how are these costs recovered. Increased overhead costs and inflation /
escalation of material, labor and major equipment costs many times can also play a part in
extra costs to the contractor. Deliberation must now be focused on commercial conditions,
general and administrative overhead costs, in view of the fact that the general contractors
change order will be compiled with many change order pricing submissions from a number
vendors and sub-contractors, and because the terms and conditions, profit margins general
and administrative overhead percentage uplifts in the construction industry vary widely, good
documentation must be kept to support the commercial basis of the change order. A
reasonable overhead and profit fee perhaps 10% 15% should of course be part of the
change order, it should be added / incorporated after all the costs have been collected
together with the appropriate percentage for general and administrative overhead costs 5%
21
t0 10% seems to be a value seen in industry, cost related to pricing out the change order
should also be included. The change order should contain specific language for acceptance
of a change orders. (Pricing basis is valid for 30 - 60 days after this time we reserve the right
to re-visit the cost values, due to potential cost increases from our sub contractors and
vendors related to price increase related to material cost and increased costs of labor and
overhead fees) When a change order is not approved, the contractor should be compensated
for all costs incurred in the study / preparation of the change order quotation, the cost of the
estimating effort should be reimbursed. (Many owners will not like this statement, however
many owners understand the work effort required by the contractor to come up with the cost
of executing a change order proposal, phone calls, copies of specifications, memos, scopes
of work etc there is no such thing as a free lunch).
Listing of construction field reports / documents that should be maintained, to support any
future change orders and potential claims:
A claim is a request by one of the parties to the contract to seek additional payments and
possibly additional time to execute the contract. Like all other situations in business, there is
the right time and a wrong time to submit a claim to a client / owner, to just send it out of the
blue is of course not a smart way of doing it, the client should have some insight to the claim,
so it doesnt catch them off guard.
Reasons for a claim could be one of the following.
22
Prior to producing and sending a claim or notifying the party that a claim will be forthcoming,
be satisfied the claim is just legitimate and that the claim is fair and represents real life
situation (costs have been incurred, outside the scope of the original project, due to no fault
of the contracting firm).
The point of the following observations is to improve the task of researching and collecting
documents / back up data needed to support the claim, following a thorough assessment, if
the contractor or engineering firm is persuaded a claim is appropriate, consider and follow
the subsequent measures and steps indicated (of course no two claims situations are the
same basically use the methodology as a guide). Have a good handle on the terms and
conditions of the project contract and determine what length of time is required prior to
informing the owner regarding a potential claim (dont leave the claim resolution to the end of
the project!!!!) Have appreciation of the big picture and be aware of all direct and supporting
items that could be part of the claim if management has made the decision to submit the
claim know the issues so you can talk with some authority when the owner starts asking
questions about the claim. A valid question is are the legal fees recoverable or is this a cost
the contractor will have to absorb, are they considered a cost of doing business.
All construction related organizations, contractors and A/E firms that encounter a delay,
disruption or stoppage of work have to bear in mind that it is fundamental for future survival to
keep up to date documentation / records on every project they are involved with. This
includes the retention of all project related:
Memos:
Minutes of meetings:
E-mails:
Phone messages / verbal instructions should be documented.
Drawings
Specifications
Other relevant documents:
These must be filed away for possible future action. This includes project related
correspondence between the project team members must be acknowledged, acted upon
and filed during the projects life cycle, verbal communications should always be confirmed in
writing e-mails are a great application of confirming actions. The contractors project
manager / site superintendent must be educated to maintain a precise daily activity log /
diary, recording each days major events, visitors, accidents, number of workers, deliveries,
weather conditions, delays, stoppages, completion of certain units, when work areas were
handed over by the client, problems experienced, milestones achieved etc. Signed daily
project timecards, brass ally records, payroll documents, overtime logs, accident notices, etc.
must be retained together with copies of all purchase orders, sub contracts, site meetings,
invoices, delivery receipts, progress photographs, schedules and all other relevant site
related documents. With the cooperation of lawyer if necessary or a specialist claims consult
if deemed appropriate, draft and prepare a position letter delineating the details of the claim
to the appropriate owner project representative(s), i.e. clerk of the works / owners
23
representative or perhaps to all of them lay it out on the table. The letter: should give
details the nature of your claim in adequate detail to portray the claim in some detail (it
basically gives a basic outline of the issues and challenges being faced or recently
experienced) note this should not come out of the blue hopefully the groundwork has be laid
with conversations and comments in various weekly meetings and reports; point out that the
delay and the ensuing damages / costs are the liability / responsibility of other parties on the
project; spell out the value / lump sum amount if known you are requesting for as additional
payment to relieve this problem; and indicate the time extension required that will impact the
general conditions and the completion date. If the claim is rejected, indicate that you reserve
the right to take legal proceedings on this subject at a later date if necessary, it may be a
wise move to state the following, we are giving notice to you of these additional costs
sustained by us that were not caused by our actions so you can take appropriate actions
i.e. (back charge them) against other project related organizations / parties i.e. the owner(s),
architect / engineer / construction management firm, nominated sub-contractor(s) and
nominated vendors etc. who are possibly responsible for impacting our ability to perform our
scope of work and are a root cause for our delays on the project. Initially when this is
happening it is redundant to include in the claim letter an itemized listing of the amount you
are requesting perhaps a budget value should be initially established, it may be impossible
to determine the real cost because it is currently evolving, on the other side of the coin, it is
very important to data collection activity moving along and start the due diligence effort. All
related claim letters / correspondence should at all the times be sent via express mail with
return receipt signature to make sure it arrived and who signed for it. If the claim is rejected,
the contractor / engineering firm etc should request in writing the grounds for rejection of the
claim and at the same time present and pay for a submission for arbitration. As a general
rule, this situation gets the involved parties into an initial review / possible meeting of the
minds / resolution of the claim. Many times it is prudent to utilize the services of a lawyer or a
claims consultant (an expert on producing claims) these parties typically focuses on
construction disputes this resources can be very helpful to the contractor / engineering firm
who are not usually involved on a daily basis with claims.
The following is a listing of some key issues that can be responsible for change orders and
claims:
Changed
Conditions
Rock. (Not
shown in
contract
documents)
Water (high
water table)
Scope of work
(additional
work)
Changes in
Specification /
Errors / Scope
Materials changes
Equipment
changes
Changes in
installation
methods
Design errors
Change in schedule /
Delays
Execution
Delays / Accelerated
handover
requirements
Poor productivity
Late or delayed
payment
Failure to answer
RFIs / Late shop
drawing approval
Termination
To summarize the above write up it would be reasonable to say that owners are often initially
skeptical of contractors or A/E proposals (submissions) for claims and change orders,
communications is the basic problem if the issues are discussed when they happen the
problems can many times be reduced, the root cause of the problem many times is that the
24
claim or change order is not adequately documented or discussed with the owner, it is many
times sprung on them. The contractor or A/E firm has the task to prove the scope change
(change order or claim) together with the costs and delays that he or she is passing onto the
owner; the following documentation can in many ways support a claim or can defend against
a claim.
1. Original bid documents (contract drawings, specifications and the construction
contract).
2. Instructions to bidders information.
3. Sub contractor / vendor quotes / addendum and change orders.
4. Daily time sheets.
5. PCAs.
6. Work stoppage reports.
7. As-built documentation.
8. Bore holes, sub-surface conditions.
9. Telephone conversation records.
10. Shop drawing register / vendor documentation / submittal records.
11. Keep all related project correspondence.
12. Daily equipment usage reports.
13. Photographs / videos.
14. Keep all specifications and drawings including all revisions.
15. Marked up drawings and specifications.
16. Field records, daily, weekly installed quantities.
17. Inspection reports.
18. Bid tabulations for materials and equipment.
19. Request for information log (RFIs).
20. Costing / pricing details copies of all change order bids.
21. Applicable invoices and payments.
22. Superintendents daily diary.
23. Cut sheets / fabrication drawings.
24. Relevant schedules / CPM networks.
25. Separate cost coding / WBS structure.
26. Other relevant supporting data.
27. Warranty data.
28. Punch list items.
29. Change order log (showing date submitted and date approved).
30. Owner payment schedule (planned and actual).
31. Release of liens documentation.
32. Retention release log.
Having some or all of the above documentation will many times be all that is required to settle
and finalize the specific change order, claim or dispute, time and again some negotiations /
give and take will be required to close the issue (all parties should aim for a win-win
situation). If the dispute or claim cannot be resolved contact a lawyer or a specialist claims
consultant to determine what the best path forward is to resolve this impasse.
CONTINGENCY CONSIDERATIONS AND THOUGHTS
(CAPEX) i.e. capital investment in a new facility is a common / ongoing activity for just about
all major chemical / manufacturing organizations. Prior to the ruling (by the companies
investment committee) to proceed to invest funds into a new facility, a cost estimate is
25
compiled to determine the cost of the engineering (detailed design), procurement (the
purchase of bulks and major equipment) and construct work related to the proposed facility,
an estimate by its very nature is inexact and typically fails to capture the full extent of the final
scope of the project, because it is compiled with incomplete information. The cost
ramifications of this missing scope together with the perceived risks is typically captured by
the application of a contingency provision (line item), be it 20% or 5% of the total cost of the
project, the amount / value of the contingency of course is dependent on the perceived
challenges and risks that the projects may encounter during its execution phase and of
course the accuracy of the scope of work and the skill of the team compiling the estimating
deliverables.
The definition of the word contingency is as follows: An amount / value of money or time
incorporated into a capital cost estimate for changes / modifications that history indicates will
happen / occur during the life cycle of the project. Contingency should exclude changes in
the pre-established scope of work. Contingency what is it, how is it used in the Engineering,
Procurement and Construction Industry (E.P.C.).
An amount / value added to an estimate to allow for changes that history indicates will
happen. Is not for scope changes, the scope of any project should be known, even
conceptually, i.e. a plant produces 150 ton per day of cement, a refinery produces 100,000
barrels of oil a day, any delineation from this i.e. the plant will produce 200 tons a day of
cement is a change in scope, this cost increase should not come out of the contingency fund.
Uncertainty of incidence, items reliant on an indeterminate happenings; together with
attendant expenditure / cost, an unanticipated cost related occurrence. The word contingency
is in all probability is one of the most abused and misconstrued words used in engineering /
construction industry today. The most common definition of contingency is, an amount of
time or money added to the base cost estimate to allow for changes that experience
indicates will happen during the execution of a project. Refer to the term contingency to ten
engineering / construction industry professionals and you would most likely get ten different
elucidations as to what contingency was and how it should be appraised and utilized and
what the primary purpose function of contingency is. (Contingency is by definition a widely
misused term) many people think of contingency as a scope allowance, this is a totally
erroneous view of the real meaning of contingency. Contingency, the word to an engineering
/ construction professional could create a pre-conceived image / thought process. Preconceived ideas / concepts could be,
26
Other terms that have crept into the contingency definition include: (imagine the action of
trying to fine tune a radio to get the best reception well these definitions are similar).
Resolution allowance.
Design development.
Focus allowance.
Engineering growth.
Technical contingency and general contingency.
All of these could in some ways be considered a contingency value; there purpose is to
protect the validity of the capital cost estimate, by recognizing that scope definition becomes
more focused as the project definition become more defined. Should the contingency value
recommended by a cost engineer / estimator functioning for an engineering firm or for an
owner company be more or less accurate than the value suggested by the other interested
third parties associated with the project. What contingency value is correct and what value is
unrealistic, is 5% correct or should it is 15% or even more, should the value be (low) a target
or high. The response to this question needless to say is that no one single all
encompassing, definition, designation, procedure or statement of contingency that covers
its overall use in the construction industry.
Contingency values should be included in a capital cost estimate to compensate for the main
topics mentioned below:
Successful utilization of the term contingency can only be comprehended by knowledge and
recognizing the value of such feature as the following topics.
Our track record. / The historical track record / performance of the operations /
execution group(s)
Current and future workload general / economy predominantly concerning risk
management / mitigation, world events that impact general industry and the global
economy.
Is company in the risk business does company submit lump sum, hard money bids /
the operating principals / makeup of business and industry, i.e. private Vs
government operating parameters.
How good are we at capital cost estimating, who good are the forecasting skills of
people involved in the capital cost estimating effort and future execution effort.
Team strengths do we have enough capable individuals.
27
Quality of bid / estimating deliverables / the definition / quality of the capital cost
estimate. And the quality of the engineering / specification deliverables provided. The
complete scope of work definition together with the execution plan.
The risks / the restraints on specific project related activities or special risk items,
such as time or quality, process / manufacturing / performance guarantees.
The following is a listing of contingency values for five estimating levels, together with the
relative accuracy of these estimates.
Type of Estimate
OOM / Ball Park / Blue Sky
Conceptual / Pre - Design / Feasibility
Front End / (FEED) / Preliminary
Budget Control
Lump Sum / GMP / Turnkey
Contingency %
30 - 40
20 30
15 20
7.5 15
2.5 7.5
Accuracy % +/40 50
20 30
15 20
5 10
0-5
The ground rules of estimating / cost control (Project control issues as described in previous
sections must be contained within the formal scope of work): One of the main reasons for
budget / over runs is unknown items (Undefined scope), together with imprecise scope /
estimating definition / data at during the estimating effort. Prior familiarity with project control
issues is crucial for individuals involved in selecting / evaluating the required contingency
requirements. Many times these accounts / line items / future expenditure items are more
often than not articulated (Discussed by the team in any depth) sometimes these line items
are treated as allowances and may not have sufficient definition to be accurately valued.
Contingency should not to be become a mixture of, catch-all line item, its always 5% or 10%,
it should have a approach, basis and a methodology in its build up and how it is managed
during the project execution phase, (and what happens to contingency monies not
expended). The contingency line item many times materializes as the last but one /
penultimate line cost item on a capital cost estimate summary page, (some organizations
agonize over its value, some use 5% or 10%) it is many times indicated as a specific
percentage / line item this together with a value that is of the estimated for the activities
specific to the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) project. The intricacy of
executing an EPC project the detailed design, the procurement and construction (and project
control) activities with a fixed completion date for a fixed sum of money, is a serious
undertaking that needs to be well thought-out when evaluating / weighing up contingency
risks / considerations. Terms and Conditions / Type of Contract: The precision of the capital
estimated cost will many times be enhanced for lump sum / fixed price construction projects
versus those utilizing open ended reimbursable cost plus (+) forms of contract. Specific
Events / Construction and Procurement Problems: Lock outs, strikes, world event such as
the 9/11/2001 terrorist attack and the knock on effect to the overall world economy,
performance warranties, liquidated damages, completion bonus, slippage of major equipment
deliveries, engineering delays, extreme weather conditions, minor / major accidents,
engineering errors, inflation spikes and differing labor productivity performance are just a
small number of the many construction related issues that could have an effect on the
accuracy of the projects final cost.
Questions that should be answered prior to the application of contingency are:
What is the probability of exceeding the capital cost estimate (what happens if we
exceed the A.F.E by a value greater than 10%)?
28
What is the probability of under running the capital cost estimate (do these under run
fund go back to the operating company)?
If the capital cost estimate including the calculated contingency exceeds the AFE
budget what are the consequences, will we need to go back to the B.O.D. for
additional A.F.E. funds. (Will Value Engineering be required or a will new scopes of
work need to be developed, what are the consequences of this happening).
Design Development
Engineering Growth
Focus Factor and Calibration Factor.
Definition Factor
29
PROJECT LOCATION
LABOR FACTORS
30
MONETARY ISSUES
31
Onerous terms:
Extended Warranty issues:
Liquidated damages issues:
Consequential damages issues.
Performance guarantees.
Dispute resolution issues:
Applicable laws:
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS
32
VALUE ENGINEERING
Conduct 1 2 day formal V.E. session when detailed design is 10% - 40%
complete; conduct V.E. session offsite to ensure full attention of V.E. team.
Conduct 1 2 day formal risk mitigation session in first couple of weeks / months
of projects life cycle, document all risks that could compromise the completion or
cost of CAPEX project.
33
SECTION B - 1
SCALE OF OPERATIONS - CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATES / COST CAPACITY
EXPONENTS OR 6/10 RULE VALUES
The following pages list out 150+ # Process Unit (Operating Units) / Major Equipment
items and Construction related exponent values (it is the intent to add additional
categories in future annual updates). A quick capital cost estimate(s) can be compiled by
using this method / approach known in the Process / Manufacturing - EPC industry as
cost capacity ratio exponents (however the accuracy of the resulting value
unfortunately is not very accurate so be careful with the resulting values). This is
relatively seasoned approach / method of estimating process related plants / facilities
and processing equipment major equipment (M.E.), many times called capacity or
equipment factoring or 6/10 ths rule. On many industrial / manufacturing plant projects
such as chemical facility / process plants, there is a relationship between the capacity of
the plant and the historical / current cost of the facility.
New facility production rate, divided by known facility production rate, multiplied by
known facility cost, multiplied by appropriate exponents listed below. An example of this
is as follows:
An Acetic Acid Plant: A 15,000 gallon a day facility cost US$14.45 million to engineer,
procure and construct what would an 8,500 gallon plant cost to engineer, procure and
construct.
The exponent for an Acetic Acid Plant is 0.70, taken from the list below.
The calculation is 8.500 gallons divided by 15,000 gallons = 0.566 this value multiplied
by xy multiplied by 0.70 (exponent) = 0.672
The original 15,000 gallon plant cost $14.45 million this value multiplied by 0.672 =
$9.71 million, this would be the cost of an 8,500 gallon a day plant. This value can be
calibrated for escalation if necessary.
This approach should be utilized for very early / order of magnitude estimates, many
times it is the first estimate compiled. The industry average (exponent) cost capacity
factor (n) has an average value of between 0.5 and 0.7 (of course there are exponents
that fall above and below these values), 0.6 is widely used, hence its name the 6/10th
factor. The $64,000 question is - is the OSBL work / scope included in the factors, (this
issue is the subject of some debate and can be considered a grey area) this feeds the
argument of why the accuracy range i.e. +/- 35% of this estimating method is so wide).
This procedure is assumed for the same time period and location, the value / outcome
should be calibrated by an inflation / escalation indexs. This concept is thought to have
originated in the 1940s and this estimating approach is widely utilized in the Process /
Chemical / Manufacturing industries for a good number processes, plants and major
equipment items, however these exponents in a lot of cases fluctuate over a wide range.
Exponents / factor values can be found in various published books, and articles,
basically this capital cost estimating method is used to decide on various early economic
case studies, project - process configurations / schemes / process approaches / front
end studies. This estimate is typically compiled when little or no detailed engineering is
available perhaps 2% - 3% or even less, (or it might be done when there is a preliminary
engineering report) the estimating data is taken from early P.F.D.s, and preliminary
major equipment lists, daily / yearly production rates, historical data, the accuracy of this
type of estimate is perhaps at best +/-35%, contingency should not be added to the
estimated cost, presumably the historical cost data, i.e. exponent is based on total
installed cost which includes all major equipment, bulks, labor, in directs including
detailed design, construction management and contingency. The exponents indicated
below do not reflect the O.S.B.L. scope of work.
The following are exponents for a variety of process / chemical / manufacturing plants
and process equipment, the data was compiled from North American and some Western
European facilities constructed in the 1995 2008 period. A line item value must be
added to the resulting results to incorporate OSBL scope 10% - 30% would be
appropriate, for significant OSBL work this value needs to be increased to perhaps 30%
50%.
0.63
Polymerization 0.55
Polymer plant, small unit 0.78
Power Plant Coal 150 1,500 MW 0.85
Power Plant Gas 150 1,500 MW 0.82
Power Plant Oil 150 1,500 MW 0.85
Power Plant Nuclear 150 1,500 MW 0.77
Precipitator dust collector 0.75
Pressure Vessel (CS) 0.60
Pressure Vessel (SS) 0.65
Propylene unit 0.72
Pump centrifugal 400 GPM and above 0.37
Reactor, C.S. or S.S. 1,000 gallon and above 0.50
Reactor SS glass lined 1,000 gallon and above 0.55
Refineries, 50,000 bbls /day and above and larger 0.63
Refineries, 50,000 bbls /day and smaller 0.65
Reforming, catalysts units 0.60
Refrigeration plant
0.65
SECTION B - 2
CHEMICAL PLANTS / MANUFACTURING FACILITIES
RATIO / PERCENTAGE ESTIMATING FACTORS
The data and various cost models contained in this section are supplementary to the
data contained in Section A 3. This first method Lang factors comes up with a total
installed cost (T.I.C.), it is compiled a by multiplying the cost of major equipment item,
i.e. a compressor, a pump, a tower etc, by specific multiplier, this multiplier includes such
items as concrete, structural steel, piping, electrical etc. (i.e., all the bulk material items
and in directs plus detailed design). The grandfather of ratio factors is thought to be
Mr. Hans Lang who was an Engineer / Estimator with a major engineering firm in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the late 1940s and early 1950s the method is known as
the Lang Factor method is widely used in the Process / Chemical related industries.
There are a number of similar factors produced by other individuals, these include Hand,
Cran, Gallagher, Suarez, Guthrie, Nishimura who has done additional research work
on these factors, other proponents of this approach include Bach, Chilton, Peters &
Timmerhaus, Miller, Wroth and Compass International to name but a few. In view of the
fact that some of these factors were introduce 20 - 40 + years ago many estimators /
engineers are skeptical about using them today, however these factors remain valid
today as an early estimating tool, many engineers, contractors and owners have
compiled their own factors / multipliers to replicate their particular practices and historical
data. Note these factors are useful for coming up with very early order of magnitude
estimates, the accuracy of these factors are at best +/- 30%. When evaluating the
above methodology consider what Mr. Hans J. Lang published in the June1948 edition
of Chemical Engineering.
1) Delivered Major Equipment Cost x 4.74 for a fluid / liquid process plant. = Total
Estimated Plant Cost.
2) Delivered Major Equipment Cost x 3.63 for a solids / fluid - liquid process plant: =
Total Estimated Plant Cost.
3) Delivered Major Equipment Cost x 3.10 for a solids process plant. = Total Estimated
Plant Cost.
Mr. Lang presented this data approx 50 + years ago, is this data still relevant today, in
many ways the answer is yes, things that have changed in the last 50 years include,
instrumentation / control systems use of Delta V and TDC 3000 are commonplace today,
these are totally different than systems utilized in the 1940 / 50s, they are much more
expensive today than the time these factors were established, environmental issues,
project delivery methods, different materials, different major equipment etc, etc. The
above values do not mention O.S.B.L. work the assumption being that the above values
are for I.S.B.L. work only. There are other individuals that developed ratios and
multipliers; some of the most frequently used multipliers, are mention above. As we
stated before the information contained in this section is supplementary to the data
expensive alloys etc.), this could increase the cost by 0 15%, evaluated if the initial
CAPEX estimated needs to be modified for these circumstances.
4) Location, the distance from the owners and EPC firm offices causes increased travel
cost and travel time, per diems and associated costs are required for all key staff,
this could increase the cost by 0 5%, consider if the initial CAPEX estimated needs
to be calibrated for this situation.
5) Percentage split or type of plant i.e. All fluids, 50/50 or 25/75 split of Fluids and
Solids or all Solids, deciding on the correct split / percentage bulk material and labor
/ sub contract labor can influence the percentages used, thus impacting the bottom
line cost. Fluids Vs solids fluids type plants typically have a lot more pumps, piping
and instrumentation work associated with them. Piping percentage on material and
labor could increase by 0 20% from mid point to high range value, evaluate if the
initial CAPEX estimated needs to be fine tuned for this situation.
6) Corrosive chemicals, this situation typically drives the cost of the painting, structural
steel, piping (high stainless steel, alloys, glass lined piping systems etc.) and
instrumentation values up, similar to (1) above for painting, structural steel, piping
and instrumentation. And note (C) following. Piping, painting, structural steel and
instrumentation value could increase by 0 15% from mid point to high range,
evaluated if the initial CAPEX estimated needs to be adjusted for these
circumstances.
7) Inclement / bad weather typically drives the site work (Northern or Southern extreme
weather locations), civil and concrete values up and the overhead values, use mid
point to high end ranges for civil and concrete values. Site work and civil / concrete
value could increase by 0 10% from mid point to high range, evaluated if the initial
CAPEX estimated needs to be modified for these circumstances.
8) Control system, a highly automated process plant is expensive, case in point - a fully
automated facility in North America is many time the norm, in some less developed
countries there is a limited use of instrumentation, a lot of the valves and other
devices are opened and closed by hand, this could increase the cost of the plant by
0 15%, consider if the initial CAPEX estimated needs to be calibrated for this
situation.
9) New Technology / First of it kind or type of specific plant. (No real track record of a
similar facility exists within the organizations database). This situation can ripple
through all of the construction / engineering scope, driving all of the ratios /
percentages up, especially the detailed design value. All construction and EPC
percentages could increase by 0 20% from mid point to high range, evaluated if the
initial CAPEX estimated needs to be modified for these circumstances.
10) Revamp / Modifications / Upgrade / Modernization to existing Facility / Plant.
Percentage values should be increased in the order of 25% - 75% (or possibly more)
to reflect unique rework / revamp engineering and field construction activities,
determine if the initial CAPEX estimated needs to be modified for these
circumstances.
11) Working inside an ongoing facility, temporary partitions, barricades, shift work,
overtime limited use of construction equipment, this could increase the cost by 0
10%, consider if the initial CAPEX estimated needs to be calibrated for this situation.
12) Other considerations, Fast track / Flash track - Construction / Modular Construction /
other unique situations. Site work, structural steel and civil / concrete value could
increase by 0 15% from mid point to high range, evaluate if the initial CAPEX
estimated needs to be modified for this situation.
Example (1) Percentage / Multiplier Method Accuracy +/- 25%
Direct Costs
Major Equipment Cost (including freight)
% of M.E. cost
Major Equipment setting
12%
Site Development
1%
Civil / Concrete
2%
Structural Steel
4%
Facility (a)
73%
Piping
80%
Instrumentation
40%
Electrical
22%
Insulation
5%
Painting / Coatings
4%
F/Protection / Refractory
2%
245%
$1,093,000
S/T
$2,677,850
$3,770,850
S/T
$263,960
$641,045
$75,417
$115,000
$57,000
$123,000
$1,275,422
Indirect Costs
Construction Mgmt
7%
Detailed Design / H.O.EPC costs
General Conditions 2%
Client front end engineering
Spare Parts
Taxes
17%
total
15%
$5,046,272
$756,940
$5,803,212
SF / Cost M2 / Cost
28.83
310.26
11.38
17.67
19.61
22.57
122.41
190.13
210.96
242.87
14.64
10.74
157.57
115.57
10.17
109.39
17.34
5.75
28.17
2.18
0.97
186.55
61.86
303.10
23.44
10.42
5.96
64.14
17.94
50.80
193.06
546.62
3.78
40.70
29.02
5.05
312.21
54.37
302.57
26.78
14.37
3,255.61
288.12
154.64
19
Validation
Services
Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
113.60%
24,747,465
343.71
3,698.37
Project duration Start of detailed design 3/2003 completion of detailed design 6/2004 15
months
Start of Construction 8/2003 completion of construction 5/2005 21 months
Note B: Detailed design includes a fee of $350,000
Note C: CM includes a fee of $250,000. CM
already has a presence on site some staff
members / temporary offices were used,
saving some CapEx funds.
100.0
24
3 10
4 12
10 35
15 40
5 25
40 150
15 50
15 50
3 15
26
27
LABOR %
0
85
40
55
40
55
55
40
40
40
75
40
MATERIAL %
100
15
60
45
60
45
45
60
60
60
25
60
36
50
50
25 45
35
65
10 15% of the above total value
4 7% of the above total value
** The above Includes craft supervision, temporary facilities, testing, clean up, security,
rental equipment, warehousing, payroll taxes / benefits, workers comp, small tools /
consumables
For OSBL work add 5 70%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Assume
Purchase Order
Value
Ex works
(excludes freight)
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
Multiplying % range
to obtain a fully
installed M.E. item
(Excluded M.E.
cost)
40 60%
80 100%
45 75%
70 90%
40 60%
50 70%
40 80%
40 80%
40 80%
40 80%
50 90%
50 90%
Total (Average)
Installed cost M.E.
including / excluding
items below
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
50 90%
40 60%
30 60%
70 120%
$85,000
$75,000
$72,500
$97,500
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
40 60%
30 50%
60 80%
70 90%
70 120%
80 140%
90 150%
90 150%
50 80%
70 100%
80 100%
50 80%
90 150%
60 80%
70 90%
40 70%
80 100%
50 80%
40 70%
80 100%
80 120%
$75,000
$70,000
$85,000
$90,000
$97,500
$110,000
$110,000
$110,000
$82,500
$92,500
$95,000
$82,500
$110,000
$85,000
$80,000
$77,500
$95,000
$82,500
$77,500
$95,000
$100,000
$75,000
$95,000
$80,000
$90,000
$75,000
$80,000
$80,000
$80,000
$80,000
$80,000
$85,000
$85,000
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
90 130%
90 130%
70 90%
60 90%
90 110%
40 60%
30 40%
40 60%
50 70%
80 130%
20 40%
40 60%
20 40%
30 60%
30 50%
80 110%
70 100%
20 40%
50 80%
$105,000
$105,000
$90,000
$87,500
$100,000
$75,000
$67,500
$75,000
$80,000
$102,500
$65,000
$75,000
$65,000
$72,500
$70,000
$97,500
$92,500
$65,000
$82,500
5%
5%
$1,969,375
98,469
98,469
$2,166,313
9%
25%
25%
20%
10%
20%
10%
10%
5%
7%
3%
194,968
541,578
541,578
433,263
216,631
433,263
216,631
216,631
108,316
151,642
64,989
$3,119,491
TOTAL DIRECTS
TOTAL M.E. & BULKS OF A
$5,285,804
845,729
200,000
50,000
50,000
3%
$9,551,023
286,531
15%
$9,837,554
1,475,633
TOTAL
$11,313,187
10
(7) Paint Manufacturing Facility / Partial Retrofit located in Mid West (2004 Costs)
Constructed on an established operating site with adequate utilities (needing
some modification / upgrading)
Category
Major Equipment (M.E) 89 items
$ Million
14.15
Freight
Setting of M.E. (L&M)
Demolition (L&M)
Asbestos removal (L&M)
Site Preparation (L&M)
C/S/A (L&M)
Existing Pipe modifications (L&M)
Piping (L&M)
Electrical (L&M)
I/C (L&M)
Insulation (L&M)
Painting (L&M)
Warehouse / Loading Area
Warehouse Racks / Forklifts /
Pallets / Robotic packers
Miscellaneous items (F-P, Spare
Parts, V.A. I/C programming
(L&M)
Utilities / tie ins
Direct Costs
Field Establishment / In Directs
37.5%
Directs + Indirect Costs
Detailed Design (E&P ) 9.7%
CM 3.5%
Total Plant Cost
0.49
0.63
0.64
0.37
0.66
1.88
0.17
6.12
2.53
2.24
0.88
0.52
0.47
0.22
Remarks
757 Design hours /
Per M.E. item
0.32
0.58
32.87
12.33
45.20
4.38
1.58
51.16
Excludes: Owner corporate engineering $515,000 and Front End Engineering Study
$330,000 that was completed in 2002:
Demolition and asbestos removal could be an expense item. Refer to previous L & M
ratios to determine man-hours and material ratios / splits.
Definition of Terms / Nomenclature of Major Accounts
The subsequent listing is an explanation of the significant elements that are
incorporated in the various work disciplines as delineated in the previous Ratio /
Estimating Factor Tables (refer to page 2 & 3 for typical uplift percentages).
Economic climate.
Congested work area / poor site conditions.
11
M.E. Major Equipment Scope of work includes the major equipment (M.E.) cost plus
transportation (air, road or barge) costs to the site, (excludes import duties, tariffs etc,
typically required on international projects)
S.M.E. Setting of Major Equipment (M.E.), the lifting from the (air, road or barge) means
of transport and temporary storage, the physical site transportation from say a
warehouse / lay down area, the setting and erection labor, material and labor required
to, set in place, erect / install internals, alignment, internal welding of the major
equipment in its ultimate location for future production / mechanical operation and
grouting, excludes crane costs, scaffolding, spare parts and vendor start up costs.
S.W. Site Work Scope of work includes all the general site work preparation of the new
plant / facility site for construction together with required tree grubbing, general clearing,
rough grading, hand and machine excavation, rock removal if required, cut and fill,
imported fill / borrow / engineered material, site remediation (asbestos removal, lead
paint and contaminated soil) tunneling / boring / jacking, on site / off site disposal,
tamping, soil compaction and fine grading, drainage trenches, catch pits / culverts,
manholes, run off drains / basins, dams, earth berms, railroad track and switch points /
spurs, all necessary crusher run, hardcore, stone / gravel base, materials for hard
standings, footpaths, roads, parking areas and including fencing / gates and any
landscaping / plantings. Inside battery limit concrete or tarmac / bituminous pavements
for roads, process area and parking areas:
C.C. Civil / Concrete Scope of work includes all necessary structural excavation (hand
and machine), planking and strutting, tamping, foundations concrete / timber piling,
sheet piling, backfill, formwork, reinforcing steel (cutting, fabricating and installing),
accessories, mesh reinforcement, pre cast concrete, miscellaneous iron / steel cast in
place items (holding down bolts / plates / brackets / channel cast in place angle iron),
thrust blocks, grouting, temporary protection, finishing and curing of concrete, major
equipment foundations and process equipment structures / pads is included in this
account. Facilities / Building specific concrete including excavation, backfill, concrete
foundations, formwork, rebar, elevated slabs etc. is included under Facilities / Buildings
described later.
S.S. Structural Steel - Scope of work includes all fabrication and installation activities
specific to the cost of procuring (not the purchasing effort man hours this is included in
the EPC ratio), welding, cutting, rolling, heat treating, pre-fabricating and installing major
and minor structural steel members and miscellaneous steel / platforms, cold formed
metal framing, pipe racks etc, (not cast in place steel channel / angle iron items which is
typically installed during the concrete installation phase), related to, major equipment
12
supports, checker plate, mesh type flooring, process structures, major equipment
platforms, monorails, walkways, ladders and handrails. Structural steel is assumed to be
delivered with prime coat paint application. Structural Steel for facilities / buildings is
captured in the Facilities / Buildings ratio value.
F.B. Facilities / Buildings Scope of work takes into account of the cost of the facility /
buildings together with required excavation, backfill, hardcore, under slab stone, under
slab utilities, concrete foundations and other cast in place and pre-cast concrete, house
keeping pads, total superstructure (exterior and interior walls / structural support system
concrete or structural steel), metal decking, stairs, windows, siding, drains, HVAC,
plumbing, building service piping, fire protection, insulation, painting, roofing,
penthouses, and all architectural finishes, wood / metal doors, wood work, built in
cabinets / cupboards, elevators, escalators, BMS and utility piping to a demarcation
point of say 10 feet / 3 meters outside the buildings exterior walls. The pipe joining this
building piping should be captured in the piping account or in the O.S.B.L. piping what
ever the case may be. Facility / Building specific (lighting / power / emergency) electrical
work, such as facility / building power and lighting is included in this ratio value, excludes
furniture, fixtures and window treatments.
P.W. Piping - (below grade and above grade): Scope of work encompasses all metal,
clay and plastic piping systems Refer to previous Note C regarding base case data, i.e.
60 / 40 split. Includes all related project underground piping supporting the specific
project including but not limited to, utility, fire water, potable and process service
underground lines to the I.S.B.L. inside battery limit boundary. The piping ratio /
percentage value includes excavation, planking and strutting, backfill, removal of surplus
material, concrete, stone, sand, bedding material and tarmac / concrete, all of the buy
out of the required piping / fittings (bends, elbows, tees, reducers etc) (not the
procurement related man hours), both for on site and off site fabrication and erection of
all below grade / above ground process / utility / service related piping systems including
steam tracing, steam traps, any sump ejectors, valves and fittings, includes hangars,
pipe supports system testing (hydro / x rays, welding testing is typically included in O/H
and indirect accounts), vents, drains, utility stations, eye wash stations / emergency
showers and instrument connections to the established inside battery boundary. This
ratio includes for the labor installation cost of relief / control valves (motor controlled
valves) and inline instrumentation devices (pipe fitter installation work, claimed by pipe
fitters on union executed projects). The material cost of these (instrumentation related
items) is accounted for / included in the Instrument ratio / percentage (note this cost is
typically a minor value). Ensure that no duplication takes place between sewer and
storm / potable water piping systems (these systems could include cast iron, pre cast
concrete, vitrified clay, PVC piping materials) covered in Site Works or in Facilities.
Determine a point at which the Facility / Building piping is included with piping or facility /
building typically 10 feet or 3 meters from exterior of exterior wall.
E.W. Electrical Work Scope of work includes all requisite labor and material for under
ground and above grade power and lighting scope such as duct banks, duct manholes,
grounding system, lightning protection, cable ducts, cable tray, conduit, wire, cable,
cable pulling, terminations etc. to the established I.S.B.L. inside battery boundary. Also
includes excavation, backfill and removal of surplus material, planking and strutting,
concrete, stone, crusher run, sand and tarmac / concrete / colored concrete. All items
required for the complete above ground power and lighting systems, emergency
generator systems, M.C.C. s, motors, transformers and electrical heat tracing for the
total project, specific to the inside battery limits scope of work. Also includes the
installation of all electrical instruments and their hook-up (electrician work) but not the
13
material cost of the instrumentation device, which is included with the Instrument ratio
value.
I & C. Instrumentation / Controls Scope of work includes all necessary material and
labor specific to the cost of instrumentation / control work, all required instrumentation
hardware / displays / panels / screens / monitors and wiring, in line instrument devices,
control valves, relief valves, control / display panels, orifice fittings, conduit, junction
boxes, control cable and all other instrument devices / items plus tubing, tube bundles,
minor tubing and control wire tray materials essential to install these items. The labor
man hours / cost (pipe fitter required work) to set and install various instrumentation /
piping interface devices such as pressure relief / control valves, inline piping /
instrumentation interfaces and orifice / flow measuring devices is accounted / captured
for under Piping Work P.W. Extensive software programming work is excluded from this
ratio, should be part of the EPC Engineering cost, or is work carried out by owners work
force.
Insulation / F.P. / Ref. Insulation / Fireproofing / Refractory Work Scope of work
includes all labor and material costs of insulation material and protective covering
(plastic / aluminum / s. s. jacket) and fireproofing / refractory related to the major
equipment (process) and process piping. Facility / Building related batt insulation etc is
included with facility / buildings, fire protection systems are included with the piping.
P. / S. F. / C: Painting / Special Finishes / Coatings. Scope of work includes all
preparation / sandblasting / scrapping and protective coating of surfaces (hand work and
sprayed applications) with paint and / or special finishes for the total project excluding
facilities / buildings and off site related work.
M.W: Minor work items Scope of work covers the cost of the labor and material costs
related, all minor work items, necessary vendor assistance, spare parts, start up
activities, chemicals, grogg / catalyst, commissioning work, any minor / miscellaneous
scope items and any rework. Excludes outside battery limit work / off site O.S.B.L.
typically this could be in the 20 70% range.
North American Location Factors
The above four examples can be calibrated to different North American countries, i.e.
USA, Canada and Mexico. The selected multipliers / values determined from examples
(1) through (6) can be adjusted by the following multipliers (location factors), note these
multipliers (location factors) are valid for the year 2009.
Canada 1.03 (Montreal)
Mexico 0.94
USA 1.00 Base Case
For additional international cost data refer to The 2009 Global Construction Cost
Database Yearbook. (85 + countries)
14
SECTION B - 3
SQUARE FOOT / M2 ESTIMATING DATA
& SYSTEMS
Square foot / M2 estimate(s) are valuable when some basic information is known about
the new facility, number of floors may be known i.e. we think 5 floors would meet the
local planning board, number of people using the facility i.e. between 300 and 400
people, plus possibly 50 visitors, however a lot more design information needs to be
determined, finishes, floor to ceiling height, materials of construction, heating / cooling
system etc, all these issues need to be established in the design process, the accuracy
of this estimating method is perhaps in the 15% - 20% range. Square foot / M2
estimating is an excellent front end estimating tool that is widely used in the construction
industry, most Architects, Engineers and related construction professionals have a
decent appreciation of how this estimating technique is utilized, this section of the
database provides 2009 square foot / M2 costs for a variety of industrial and commercial
facilities, these values are current and can be calibrated to a number of overseas
locations if needed, we have also endeavored to assign costs for revamp and
modernization / upgrade of these specific facilities. To set the ground rules of the
estimating method we need to start at the beginning, we are the earliest stages of a
project, no more than 10% of the detailed design drawings and specifications have been
completed or perhaps it is still just a concept in the owners mind a lot of uncertainty
with the future project still exists, we typically know the location(s) i.e. Kutztown,
Pennsylvania or Kabul, Afghanistan, footprint area perhaps has been roughed out,
usable square foot, number of floors are possibly known, number of people that will
populate the building, but there is still a lot of details that have not been nailed down. At
this point (milestone) in the projects life cycle we typically need a budget / cost estimate
particularly during this stage which is many times called, (1) conceptual stage, (2)
programming stage and or (3) schematic / preliminary stage, this is when the critical
design decisions are made that for the most part dictate the future, go, no go verdict and
the economics of the project. In the field of planning and designing a building component
- say, roofing system or the wall system, the Architect / Engineer should judge not only
the quality and performance factors of similar / contending systems, but also their
comparative costs, life expectancy, maintenance costs and schedule implications.
Similar / contending systems in this meaning it does not simply mean the relative unit
costs of dissimilar solutions for the same roofing system. For the Architect / Engineer to
accurately consider the cost ramifications of the for a chosen system, he or she should
know the consequences which each solution will bring to bear on the total cost of the
specific facility / building he or she is planning to design. All the way through this section,
square foot / M2 cost figures are based on North American national averages
calibrated and benchmarked to Washington D.C., adjusted to 2009 pricing levels.
Locality adjustment tables may be used to calibrate these costs to local conditions for
both labor and materials. These square foot / M2 cost values include the usual
contractors markup and profit and therefore represents the anticipated actual total
installed square foot / M2 costs. Additionally, for purposes of cost comparison with
similar buildings / facilities, there are examples of average building / facilities square foot
/ M2 costs are indicated. The values include foundations, substructure, superstructure,
exterior closure, roofing systems, interior construction, elevators etc, mechanical /
electrical systems, special construction, site works specific to the building footprint,
contractors fee and overhead, the square foot / M2 values exclude land purchase,
Architectural fees usually ranging between 4% and 7%. Construction Management fees
usually ranging from 3% - 5% excluding general conditions and owner engineering
services and any significant items outside the building footprint such as parking lots,
landscaping, guard house and fencing.
The information / data and prices included in this section have been compiled from
industry sources considered to be dependable and to be representative of current
market conditions. There is no warranty, or guarantee, as to the accuracy or adequacy
of the cost data indicated, the values indicated are as has been indicated previously
national averages. They are a good starting point in the estimating effort.
Note: Adjustments should be made for applications that fall out side of the cost model
size indicated square foot values.
Example Building Cost Model = 18,000 SF, if proposed building is 10 % smaller (or
smaller still) add 5%-10% to SF / M2 unit value.
If proposed building is 10% larger (or larger than that value) discount value by 5% - 10%,
Buildings and facilities typically get less expensive as they get bigger in footprint /
useable space. The opposite is the case with smaller buildings the unit price, i.e. SF /
M2 price typically gets larger as the building gets smaller.
NEW INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOT M2 BUILDING COSTS 2009 COST BASIS
The general approach is to determine the number of floors, footprint of building / facility,
calculate usable square foot area of facility / building, select building type / specification
from list below and multiply by calculated square footage by the appropriate SF/ M2 cost
value. Modify for location by selecting city location factor indicated in Section B - 5. The
following Facility / Building costs are specified by cost model size in S.F. together with
number of floors in U.S. dollars per square foot / M2 by Facility / Building for each
category of building.
Facility / Building Costs
Cost Model
SF
$ Low
$ High
Average $
SF Cost
Average $
M2 Cost
114,000
414
436
425
4,573
72,600
229
239
234
2,518
96,000
398
420
409
4,401
30,000
120
151
136
1,463
30,000
110
135
123
1,323
85,000
116
142
129
1,388
85,000
121
148
135
1,453
85,000
117
143
130
1,399
335,000
130
159
145
1,560
335,000
120
146
133
1,431
133,000
393
425
409
4,401
45,700
125
153
139
1,496
45,700
122
148
135
1,453
45,700
117
142
130
1,399
585,000
101
107
104
1,119
Bakery
615,000
102
108
105
1,130
9,200
150
184
167
1,797
9,200
160
194
177
1,905
9,200
146
179
163
1,754
Biological Manufacturing
340,000
719
763
741
7,973
92,500
349
393
371
3,992
388,000
121
128
125
1,345
Brewery
181,000
102
108
105
1,130
Cable TV Facility
12,700
79
81
80
861
56,000
70
80
75
807
27,700
104
117
111
1,194
117,500
926
970
948
10,200
cGMP ISO 7 - 8
88,600
704
747
726
7,812
74,000
104
111
108
1,162
11,000
111
125
118
1,270
88,000
109
118
114
1,227
73,000
100
106
103
1,108
137,000
926
970
948
10,200
137,000
883
910
897
9,652
137,000
654
687
671
7,220
137,000
528
578
553
5,950
137,000
169
212
191
2,055
40,000
89
95
92
990
166,700
198
243
221
2,378
166,700
195
238
217
2,335
166,700
203
248
226
2,432
333,600
195
238
217
2,335
333,600
192
234
213
2,292
333,600
200
244
222
2,389
201,750
126
154
140
1,506
201,750
122
149
136
1,463
201,750
119
145
132
1,420
742,600
122
149
136
1,463
742,600
119
145
132
1,420
742,600
114
141
128
1,377
Lithographic Line
44,000
106
118
112
1,205
Livestock / Agricultural
Research Station
Manufacturing Light
26,000
146
154
150
1,614
32,000
75
81
78
839
69,400
79
97
88
947
69,400
78
95
87
936
69,400
82
100
91
979
(Spec A)
Manufacturing Facility 1 Floor
(Spec F)
Manufacturing Facility 1 Floor
(Spec C)
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec E)
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec D)
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec A)
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec F)
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec C)
Micro Chip / Satellite
Manufacturing Facility
Nanoscale Science Laboratory
69,400
74
89
82
882
69,400
77
95
86
925
108,600
82
100
91
979
108,600
81
99
90
968
108,600
85
103
94
1,011
108,600
77
93
85
915
108,600
80
98
89
958
163,000
321
354
338
3,637
98,500
256
299
278
2,991
285,000
121
139
130
1,399
37,370
118
144
131
1,410
37,370
112
138
125
1,345
37,370
117
143
130
1,399
37,370
113
139
126
1,356
157,800
114
140
127
1,367
157,800
109
133
121
1,302
157,800
113
139
126
1,356
157,800
110
134
122
1,313
Paper Production
106,000
101
107
104
1,119
255,600
47
58
53
570
255,600
44
55
50
538
67,800
62
76
69
742
78,000
371
398
385
4,143
51,000
589
632
611
6,574
121,500
441
462
452
4,864
Refrigerated Warehouses
54,000
102
104
103
1,108
62,000
167
183
175
1,883
64,000
163
169
166
1,786
73,000
124
127
126
1,356
98,800
103
108
106
1,141
122,000
354
376
365
3,927
345,400
643
681
662
7,123
237,500
371
398
385
4,143
105,700
130
160
145
1,560
105,700
125
152
139
1,496
105,700
133
163
148
1,592
123,700
124
151
138
1,485
123,700
119
146
133
1,431
123,700
121
148
135
1,453
79,500
135
166
151
1,625
79,500
130
159
145
1,560
79,500
134
164
149
1,603
84,000
63
68
66
710
51,500
71
87
79
850
51,500
66
81
74
796
51,500
69
85
77
829
51,500
67
82
75
807
427,000
63
71
67
721
7. Will the current utilities (water, gas, steam, power) be able to support the new
or revamped facility?
8. What are the starting completion milestones (do we need to estimate future
inflation)?
These initial questions will need to be answered prior to commencing the estimating
effort. Many times these questions are not readily available a path forward needs to be
established on how this important data can be obtained. Open topics during the front
end estimating effort will help minimize the risk items that are inherent to this Revamp /
Retrofit type of work.
New and Revamped Hi-tech facilities are amongst some of the most costly type of
construction that construction professionals will encounter, the data indicated below
hopefully will assist in determining the cost of new and revamp construction projects
specific to Hi-tech / manufacturing type facilities. The definition of revamp in this
instance includes:
services can be saved / utilized to some extent, however new load centers and new
wiring will most probably be needed, ductwork, piping systems over 15 year would most
probably be replaced in this application (use 25% - 50% of A values) refer to note 1
above; building may need to be completed in phases. New or limited laboratory services
may be added (gas, water and power), possibly new ductwork and lighting needs could
be part of this component.
D = Minor Revamp / Superficial facelift (new carpet, some additional internal walls,
additional services / upgrades, some new ceilings, new lobbies, new bathroom fixtures,
complying with ADA (handicap requirements), electrical upgrades / fiber optics and repainting work (paint and scrape), (use 5% - 20% of A values) Assumes building will
remain in operation.
Facility / Building
Costs
Cost
Average Average B / SF C / SF D / SF
Model SF SF $ Cost M2 $
= 0.75
= 0.45
= 0.15
Cost
A
Advanced Chemical
Weapons Laboratory
114,000
425
4574
319
191
64
72,600
234
2521
175
105
35
96,000
408
4397
307
184
61
Apartments 1 3 Floors
(Spec A)
30,000
135
1457
102
61
20
Apartments 1 3 Floors
(Spec B)
30,000
123
1321
92
56
19
Apartments 3 5 Floors
(Spec C)
85,000
128
1384
97
58
19
Apartments 3 5 Floors
(Spec A)
85,000
134
1449
101
61
20
Apartments 3 5 Floors
(Spec D)
85,000
129
1393
97
58
19
Apartments 5 25 Floors
(Spec D)
335,000
145
1554
109
65
22
Apartments 5 25 Floors
(Spec A)
335,000
132
1425
100
60
20
API Pharmaceutical
Facility
133,000
408
4397
307
184
61
45,700
140
1497
105
63
21
45,700
135
1452
102
61
20
45,700
129
1390
97
58
19
Automobile Production
Facility
585,000
104
1119
78
47
16
Bakery
615,000
105
1132
79
47
16
9,200
167
1798
125
76
25
9,200
177
1905
133
80
26
9,200
162
1743
122
72
24
340,000
741
7975
557
334
111
Biological Manufacturing
92,500
371
3987
278
167
56
Bleach Manufacturing
Facility
388,000
125
1340
93
57
19
Brewery
181,000
105
1126
79
47
16
Cable TV Facility
12,700
80
856
60
36
12
56,000
76
810
57
34
12
Computer /
Telecommunications
Center 2 Floors
27,700
110
1184
83
49
17
cGMP ISO 6 - 8
117,500
948
10203
711
426
142
cGMP ISO 7 - 8
88,600
725
7798
544
327
109
74,000
107
1155
81
48
16
11,000
119
1273
89
54
18
88,000
113
1220
85
51
17
73,000
103
1108
78
46
16
137,000
948
10203
711
426
142
137,000
897
9645
673
403
134
137,000
670
7212
503
301
101
137,000
553
5951
415
249
83
GMP Production
Unclassified 2 Floors
137,000
191
2053
144
86
28
Heavy Manufacturing
Facility
40,000
92
991
69
42
14
166,700
221
2375
166
100
34
166,700
216
2329
163
98
33
166,700
225
2422
169
101
34
333,600
217
2336
163
98
33
333,600
213
2294
160
96
32
333,600
222
2388
166
100
34
201,750
141
1509
106
63
21
201,750
135
1463
102
61
20
201,750
132
1422
100
60
20
742,600
135
1463
102
61
20
742,600
131
1415
99
59
20
742,600
128
1374
97
58
19
Lithographic Line
44,000
112
1205
84
50
17
Livestock / Agricultural
Research Station
26,000
150
1618
112
67
22
Manufacturing Light
32,000
78
836
59
35
12
Manufacturing Facility 1
Floor (Spec E)
69,400
88
944
66
40
14
Manufacturing Facility 1
Floor (Spec D)
69,400
86
929
65
39
13
Manufacturing Facility 1
Floor (Spec A)
69,400
90
975
68
41
14
Manufacturing Facility 1
Floor (Spec F)
69,400
82
876
62
37
13
Manufacturing Facility 1
Floor (Spec C)
69,400
86
922
65
39
13
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec E)
108,600
91
980
68
41
14
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec D)
108,600
89
964
67
40
14
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec A)
108,600
93
1011
70
42
14
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec F)
108,600
85
911
64
38
13
Manufacturing Facility 2 - 3
Floor (Spec C)
108,600
89
957
67
40
14
163,000
338
3635
254
152
50
Nanoscale Science
Laboratory
98,500
278
2990
209
125
42
285,000
130
1395
98
59
20
37,370
130
1405
98
59
20
37,370
125
1344
93
57
19
37,370
129
1392
97
58
19
37,370
126
1353
95
57
19
157,800
127
1370
96
57
19
157,800
122
1308
91
55
18
157,800
126
1357
95
57
19
157,800
123
1318
92
56
19
Paper Production
106,000
104
1117
78
47
16
Parking Garage 3 - 5
Floors (Spec D)
255,600
53
561
40
24
Parking Garage 3 - 5
Floors (Spec A)
255,600
49
530
37
22
Parking Garage
underground 2 Floors
(Spec G)
67,800
68
735
51
30
11
Pharmaceutical
Development Facility
78,000
384
4134
289
173
58
Pharmaceutical / Medical
Device Facility
51,000
610
6568
458
274
91
121,500
452
4862
339
204
68
Refrigerated Warehouses
54,000
103
1108
78
46
16
Research Laboratory
(Basic Research) 2 Floors
62,000
175
1883
131
79
26
64,000
166
1783
125
75
25
73,000
126
1351
95
57
19
98,800
105
1135
79
47
16
Toxicology Research
Laboratory 4 Floors
122,000
365
3929
274
165
55
University Research
Medical Facility 9 Floors
345,400
663
7124
497
298
100
University / Biomedical
Genomics
237,500
384
4134
289
173
58
105,700
145
1556
109
65
22
105,700
139
1494
104
62
21
105,700
148
1591
111
66
22
University Dormitory 3 - 5
Floors (Spec A)
123,700
138
1481
103
62
21
University Dormitory 3 - 5
Floors (Spec C)
123,700
132
1424
100
60
20
University Dormitory 3 - 5
Floors (Spec D)
123,700
134
1447
101
61
20
University Laboratory 1 - 2
Floors (Spec A)
79,500
151
1623
113
68
23
University Laboratory 1 - 2
Floors (Spec C)
79,500
145
1555
109
65
22
University Laboratory 1 - 2
Floors (Spec D)
79,500
149
1603
112
67
22
84,000
65
704
49
29
51,500
79
852
59
36
12
51,500
74
792
56
34
12
51,500
77
831
58
35
12
51,500
75
799
56
34
12
427,000
67
722
50
30
11
Note: the accuracy of these numbers indicated in columns A, B; C and D are in the 10%
15% range:
AVERAGE BUILDING COSTS BY PERCENTAGE
10
PERCENTAG
E
BUILDING SYSTEM
FOUNDATIONS
FLOORS ON
GRADE (SOG)
SUPERSTRUCTUR
E
ROOFING
EXTERIOR WALLS
PARTITIONS
WALL FINISHES
FLOOR FINISHES
CEILING FINISHES
CONVEYING
SYSTEMS
SPECIALTIES
FIXED EQUIPMENT
HVAC
PLUMBING
ELECTRICAL
Total
AVERAGE
$ / SF TOTAL
3.2%
9.1%
$3.35
$9.70
19.9%
$9.59
3.8%
10.9%
0.5%
1.8%
4.1%
2.2%
0.0%
$4.03
$11.60
$0.51
$1.92
$4.36
$2.34
$0.00
0.9%
10.3%
9.1%
7.8%
16.4%
100.0%
$0.90
$10.97
$9.69
$8.31
$17.46
$94.73
GROSS BUILDING SF COST (excludes parking areas / and items outside facility footprint and all
Design / CM fees)
11
25 floors - 200 apartments Major N.E. USA City (not NY City) Downtown location
2007 Cost Basis: 437,690 Total GSF U/G parking for 200 Vehicles
#
Category / Element
$ Cost in millions % of Total Cost Cost per unit
1 General Conditions / Preliminaries (CM
5.592
6.99%
staff)
2 Demolition
0.552
0.69%
3 Excavation for basement
0.629
0.79%
4 Piling / caissons
1.328
1.66%
5 Landscaping / plantings
0.063
0.08%
6 Exterior paving
0.168
0.21%
7 Concrete structure (Concrete frame & P.C.
19.792
24.74%
floors)
8 Structural steel (framing)
0.792
0.99%
9 Steel stairs
0.614
0.77%
10 Carpentry
0.715
0.89%
11 Cabinets / millwork (foyer - lobby)
0.104
0.13%
12 Membrane roof
0.527
0.66%
13 Roofing pavers etc
0.021
0.03%
14 Roof screen
0.225
0.28%
15 Garage doors
0.087
0.11%
16 Doors / frames / lobby entrance
2.448
3.06%
17 Door furniture
0.187
0.23%
18 Caulking
0.153
0.19%
19 Windows / Ext doors
3.144
3.93%
20 Internal walls / ceiling
5.835
7.29%
21 Tile work
1.656
2.07%
22 Ceiling treatments
0.350
0.44%
23 Carpet / wood floors
1.170
1.46%
24 Paint
0.908
1.13%
25 Kitchen cabinets
0.901
1.13%
26 Kitchen appliances
0.691
0.86%
27 Miscl louvers
0.105
0.13%
28 Signs
0.057
0.07%
29 Toilet Fixtures
0.487
0.61%
30 Fire Protection
1.313
1.64%
31 Plumbing (incl some fixtures)
5.101
6.38%
$25,505
32 HVAC
5.311
6.64%
$26,555
33 Trash chute
0.140
0.17%
34 Blinds / Drapes / WT
0.211
0.26%
35 Mail boxes
0.083
0.10%
36 Washer / dryer venting
0.281
0.35%
37 Elevators (2 #)
1.747
2.18%
38 Electrical
6.427
8.03%
$32,135
39 Security system / CCTV / Miscellaneous
0.351
0.44%
items
Construction Cost
87.82%
70.266
12
40
41
42
43
44
Insurance
Business Tax
Building permits
Bonding / Surety / Sub guard
CM Fee
Construction Cost + above 5 items
45 A/E Fee (includes MEP and Structural)
Construction Cost A/E fees
Cost per SF
0.842
0.275
0.214
1.175
2.350
75.122
4.890
80.012
1.05%
0.34%
0.27%
1.47%
2.94%
93.89%
6.11%
100.00%
$400,060
$183
Various all inclusive price lists (Labor & Material) Unit Prices used for quick OOM budgets or for
checking pricing from a contractor. (Includes contractors O/H and profit) (To convert SF to M2
multiply by 10.76 to convert LF to M multiply by 3.28)
Construction category
Concrete paving 4 thick
Bituminous paving / parking 4 thick with 4 stone
Fume Hoods excluding HVAC ductwork
Dock Levelers 6 x 8
Directory Boards 4 x 3
Emergency Lighting (nic-cad)
Lawn Sprinkler System
Epoxy Resin Floor
Welded PVC Floor
Epoxy Terrazzo with wainscot
Vinyl Tile Floor
High Pressure Laminated Wall System
Clean Room Demountable Wall Panel
Ceiling Demount / Access Clean room
CCTV system (1 # TV / 2 # Cameras)
Locker single tier 72 high x 18 wide
Washer Heavy Duty (20 30 pound)
Dryer Gas or Electric Heavy Duty (20 30 pound)
Card Reader (250 Cards)
Smoke Detector
Fume Hood / with ductwork
Dock Levelers 6 x 8
Ditto 8 x 8
13
Unit Price
$2.99 / $4.15 SF
$16.70 / $25.94 SY
$777 - $1,901 each
$3,812 to $6,195 each
$546 - $982 each
$462 - $751 each
$0.79 SF
$5.67 SF
$5.57 SF
$13.44 SF
$2.94 SF
$28.77 SF
$38.85 SF
$21.50 SF
$3,990 EACH
$173 EACH
$1,124 EACH
$1,407 EACH
$2,021 EACH
$163 EACH
$903 - $1,827 / LF
$4,641 EACH
$5,381 EACH
SECTION B 4
UNIT PRICE ESTIMATING DATA / INFORMATION
The following listing of unit prices are focused on process / manufacturing CAPEX
projects ranging in cost from $0.50 to $100 + million. These unit costs are for new
construction, it should be noted that alteration / revamp / major renovation construction
work could cost between 10% and 50% more than the values indicated the nine listings
indicated. Theses unit prices are 2009 values (calibrated to mid point of year) they are
based on historical data of projects completed in North America and have been adjusted
to reflect pricing within the Washington DC beltway (25 - 40 mile radius). A hybrid of
Union / Non-union pay scales have been used in determining labor / installation values:
(The labor cost value includes a value for construction / rental equipment, i.e., 6.50%,
this is for cranes, welding machines and similar types of equipment required to complete
each individual task). The units include supervision, plus a profit margin of 10%. (A
percentage of between 7 % 11% - suggest 8.5% should be added to the values
indicated to capture site establishment (Division 1 / Preliminaries) costs for such items
as scaffolding, trailers, testing, temporary warehousing and testing etc:
General Conversion Values - Imperial to Metric Units
25 US Gallons
1 Inch
1 square foot
1 Meter
1 Meter
1 Square yard
1 Cubic foot
1 Foot
1 Yard
1 Mile 1,760 yards
1 Cubic Yard
10.76 Square Feet:
1 Gallon (Imp.)
1 Acre
1 M3 =
10 HP
F to C
1000 kg - 1 Tonne
#
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
(1)
CSI DIVISION 1 / GENERAL CONDITIONS &
DEMOLITION WORK
Superintendent
Month
7,063.80
7,063.80
Field Engineer
Month
6,180.72
6,180.72
Foreman
Month
5,309.20
5,309.20
Timekeeper / Clerk
Month
2,791.36
2,791.36
Month
6,723.60
6,723.60
Safety Engineer
Month
5,080.40
7
8
9
Warehouse Supervisor
Month
3,530.80
3,530.80
Secretary
Month
2,620.80
2,620.80
LF
1.96
1.96
TON
SF
67.64
2.58
67.64
2.58
SF
1.98
1.98
SF
2.26
2.26
SF
SF
3.33
6.14
6.62
6.14
9.95
SF
3.12
11.65
14.77
SF
3.48
3.48
6.97
SF
1.98
2.50
4.47
SF
1.30
8.84
10.14
SQ
SQ
SF
2.39
2.39
0.07
48.36
46.80
1.77
50.75
49.19
1.84
SF
0.10
0.52
0.62
CY
62.40
61.36
123.76
CY
68.64
83.20
151.84
SF
0.26
0.14
0.40
SF
0.12
0.06
0.19
SF
0.73
0.73
1.46
SF
0.59
0.86
1.46
EACH
142.00
176.88
318.88
EACH
161.94
373.68
535.62
LF
4.76
5.61
10.37
LF
4.76
6.09
10.86
EACH
62.28
268.67
330.95
TON
497.96
497.96
TON
746.95
746.95
LF
12.45
12.45
38 Demolition, C S Pipe 2 - 6
LF
20.75
20.75
5,080.40
CY
3.74
7.83
11.58
CY
3.40
6.35
9.76
CY
3.07
5.50
8.57
CY
1.41
8.11
9.53
43 Onsite encapsulation
CY
8.62
16.28
24.90
Ea
873.62
1,406.87
2,280.49
45 Ditto 5,000
Ea
1,089.19
2,541.45
3,630.64
46 Ditto 10,000
47 Office Trailer 8 x 20
48 Mob / De-mobilize
49 Office Trailer 10 x 48
Ea
1,384.18
4,197.93
5,582.11
MONTH
276.77
276.77
L/S
549.47
549.47
MONTH
373.48
373.48
50 Mob / De-mobilize
L/S
889.22
889.22
Day
124.80
124.80
Day
221.25
221.25
53 Backhoe (JCB)
Day
206.49
206.49
Day
83.96
83.96
Day
836.18
836.18
Day
375.00
375.00
Hour
97.00
97.50
Hour
115.00
115.00
Hour
73.00
73.00
60 Ditto 30 Ton
Hour
84.00
84.00
61 Ditto 60 Ton
Hour
103.00
103.00
Hour
241.00
241.00
Hour
323.00
323.00
64 Gradall 0.5 CY
Hour
59.00
59.00
65 Ditto 1.25 CY
Hour
102.00
102.00
66 Trencher Chain 15
Hour
12.00
12.00
Hour
68 Ditto 12 CY / 9 M3
Hour
69 Ditto 14 CY / 11 M3
Hour
82.00
82.00
90200
90200
102.00
102.00
70 Bulldozer 50 kw
Day
452.40
452.40
71 Ditto 75 kw
Day
483.60
483.60
72 Ditto 100 kw
Day
608.40
608.40
73 Dump truck 65 T
Day
1,294.80
1,294.80
74 Dozer 150 HP
Day
697.77
697.77
Day
334.70
334.70
Day
102.11
102.11
Day
146.36
146.36
Day
414.13
414.13
Day
178.13
178.13
Day
136.15
136.15
Day
104.37
104.37
Day
228.80
228.80
Day
576.80
576.80
Day
546.00
546.00
Day
613.60
613.60
86 Ditto 25 T
Day
712.00
712.00
87 Ditto 50 T
Day
764.40
764.40
88 Ditto 75 T
Day
868.40
868.40
Day
80.08
80.08
Day
98.80
98.80
Day
525.00
525.00
Day
750.00
750.00
Day
1,235.00
1,235.00
M2
5.18
6.53
11.71
M2
6.75
8.04
14.79
M2
9.50
9.77
19.26
M2
9.88
12.37
22.25
M2
12.10
15.33
27.42
M2
15.01
18.68
33.69
M2
11.49
11.76
23.25
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
(2)
CSI DIVISION 2 / SITE CONSTRUCTION
WORK
Clear & grub, brush and disposal
SF
0.12
0.15
0.27
CY
2.07
1.39
3.46
SF
0.06
0.07
0.13
SF
0.07
0.22
0.29
6 diameter 15 high
Each
22.69
141.82
164.52
8 diameter 20 high
Each
28.37
215.57
243.94
10 diameter 25 high
Each
39.72
323.36
363.07
12 diameter 30 high
Each
51.06
453.84
504.90
24 diameter 50 high
Each
62.41
663.73
726.14
CY
1.37
1.37
CY
1.05
1.05
CY
0.92
0.92
CY
0.51
2.66
3.17
CY
2.93
2.04
4.97
CY
18.69
1.24
19.93
CY
21.17
1.24
22.41
CY
23.66
1.24
24.90
CY
0.94
1.05
1.99
CY
1.23
1.26
2.49
CY
0.70
0.61
1.31
CY
4.13
10.31
14.44
CY
7.17
17.48
24.65
SF
1.10
1.36
2.46
SF
1.36
1.57
2.93
SF
2.10
2.93
5.03
SF
0.16
0.16
SF
0.51
0.51
SF
1.68
2.29
3.97
SF
2.37
3.36
5.73
EACH
20.81
13.95
34.76
LF
24.29
10.21
34.51
SF
2.87
4.74
7.61
LF
20.49
8.87
29.36
LF
45.51
14.88
60.39
LF
31.54
19.35
50.90
LF
18.95
16.98
35.93
EACH
19,618.58
9,030.78
28,649.36
EACH
6,788.65
7,137.43
13,926.08
LF
9.13
21.06
30.19
LF
10.21
21.83
32.04
LF
12.21
23.05
35.26
LF
13.79
15.22
29.01
LF
23.94
20.75
44.69
LF
60.29
25.65
85.94
LF
19.30
22.31
41.61
LF
27.78
26.41
54.18
LF
33.35
32.75
66.10
LF
98.40
55.92
154.33
LF
9.34
14.82
24.16
LF
11.86
19.52
31.38
LF
4.86
17.83
22.68
LF
7.17
20.05
27.22
LF
14.21
122.49
136.70
LF
12.84
15.33
28.17
LF
27.64
17.67
45.31
LF
39.36
16.43
55.80
LF
12.30
12.59
24.90
LF
14.71
13.95
28.65
LF
27.26
17.58
44.83
LF
34.26
23.55
57.80
LF
7.20
13.45
20.64
LF
17.69
17.08
34.77
EACH
616.58
617.21
1,233.79
EACH
1,382.65
847.03
2,229.68
EACH
11,626.05
760.08
12,386.13
CY
5.11
30.64
35.74
CY
5.11
41.98
47.09
CY
5.11
51.06
56.17
69 Hand backfilling
CY
2.84
18.19
21.03
CY
11.35
255.29
266.64
EACH
1,370.18
1,993.00
3,363.18
EACH
1,007.49
781.56
1,789.05
EACH
1,343.33
1,001.38
2,344.71
EACH
1,013.59
842.63
1,856.22
EACH
1,599.77
1,025.80
2,625.57
EACH
20.46
49.80
70.25
EACH
29.05
124.50
153.55
SF
0.04
0.23
0.27
SF
0.03
0.22
0.25
SF
0.04
0.19
0.23
81 Track work 48
LF
31.54
48.22
79.77
82 Stone / Ballast
CY
16.73
10.77
27.51
M3
5.27
9.58
14.85
M3
5.44
18.97
24.41
M3
6.44
9.60
16.04
M3
6.53
19.31
25.84
M3
6.14
11.61
17.74
M3
6.35
20.48
26.83
M3
8.04
12.84
20.88
M3
8.04
10.69
18.73
M3
12.15
12.57
24.72
M3
9.22
9.17
18.40
M3
4.91
13.87
18.78
M3
19.16
18.19
37.35
M3
20.35
19.38
39.73
M3
9.44
10.36
19.80
M2
23.48
6.80
30.28
M2
27.58
7.45
35.03
M2
28.98
8.90
37.89
M2
31.95
5.14
37.09
M2
36.43
6.85
43.28
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
(3)
CSI DIVISION 2 & 3 FOUNDATIONS / U.G.
WORK
Compaction of excavated material
CY
1.44
2.54
3.97
Ditto to 95%
CY
2.88
3.09
5.97
CY
4.08
8.88
12.96
CY
5.44
9.76
15.20
CY
6.59
11.05
17.64
LF
14.59
14.05
28.64
LF
17.28
15.49
32.77
LF
17.69
15.24
32.93
LF
35.22
17.56
52.78
LF
15.55
17.59
33.13
LF
6.59
11.66
18.25
EACH
86.08
209.30
295.38
EACH
212.33
480.80
693.13
EACH
556.64
808.88
1,365.52
EACH
1,859.26
1,606.44
3,465.70
EACH
3,672.61
2,737.74
6,410.35
LF
42.46
44.12
86.58
18 4 ditto 24 wide
LF
55.09
70.14
125.23
SF
0.63
1.35
1.99
SF
0.92
1.98
2.89
SF
16.53
5.94
22.46
EACH
37.44
24.96
62.40
EACH
158.08
104.00
262.08
EACH
237.12
156.00
393.12
EACH
278.72
187.20
465.92
EACH
440.96
291.20
732.16
EACH
790.40
520.00
1,310.40
EACH
1,684.80
1,110.78
2,795.58
29 Ditto 10 x 10 x 3
EACH
2,246.40
1,497.60
3,744.00
LF
258.23
333.74
591.97
LF
350.05
412.93
762.99
SF
6.28
3.91
10.19
SF
7.74
4.59
12.32
SF
8.55
5.17
13.72
SF
9.69
6.56
16.26
SF
10.39
7.40
17.79
SF
4.71
4.47
9.18
SF
5.99
5.43
11.42
SF
7.18
6.27
13.45
SF
0.19
1.15
1.34
SF
0.12
0.96
1.08
SF
0.35
1.29
1.64
SF
0.97
1.40
2.37
SF
0.18
0.45
0.62
SF
0.30
0.38
0.69
LF
0.36
7.04
7.40
LF
0.62
7.34
7.97
LF
1.16
7.70
8.86
LF
5.64
8.36
14.00
SF
1.89
2.25
4.14
SF
1.97
2.28
4.24
SF
2.37
2.37
4.74
SF
3.37
4.48
7.85
SF
4.01
4.89
8.90
SF
4.26
5.29
9.56
SF
1.50
1.62
3.12
10
SF
1.32
0.62
1.94
58 Ditto 2
SF
1.66
0.73
2.39
M3
82.50
59.47
141.97
M3
82.23
66.04
148.27
M3
82.23
64.85
147.09
M3
79.11
58.34
137.46
M3
84.91
70.08
154.98
M3
85.29
71.36
156.66
M3
91.24
75.57
166.81
66 Ditto in staircases
M3
95.88
94.94
190.82
M2
6.28
29.65
35.93
M2
7.48
31.70
39.18
M2
8.68
36.55
45.23
M2
1.91
1.68
3.60
631.18
502.68
1,133.86
614.26
360.60
974.85
M3
265.00
M3
11
895.00
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
(4)
CSI DIVISION 3, 4 & 5 STRUCTURAL
ELEMENTS / WALLS / FLOORS
STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING (100
1,000 TON)
Offices 1 3 floors
Description
Ton
2,166.28
459.51
2,625.79
Ton
2,166.28
459.51
2,625.79
Ton
2,166.28
574.39
2,740.67
SF
7.15
1.28
8.43
Ditto 18 g
SF
8.35
1.37
9.72
Ditto 16 g
SF
9.47
1.50
10.97
10 L B wall
SF
5.54
6.03
11.58
Ditto 12
SF
6.06
6.67
12.73
Ditto 14
SF
7.51
8.43
15.94
SF
5.90
4.85
10.75
11 Ditto 6 (PCCWS)
SF
7.51
5.17
12.68
12 Ditto 8 (PCCWS)
SF
13.23
6.26
19.49
SF
7.74
4.82
12.55
14 Ditto 6 (PCCWS)
SF
9.12
5.17
14.29
15 Ditto 8 (PCCWS)
SF
12.20
6.26
18.46
SF
13.86
5.28
19.15
17 Ditto 6 (PCCWS)
SF
15.94
5.51
21.46
18 Ditto 8 (PCCWS)
SF
20.57
6.83
27.40
SF
3.30
5.35
8.64
SF
4.33
6.15
10.47
SF
7.22
8.25
15.47
SF
8.03
9.83
17.86
23 6 thick
SF
13.77
14.36
28.13
24 8 thick
SF
14.90
15.85
30.75
LF
25.62
26.61
52.23
LF
30.83
27.80
58.62
LF
40.57
37.54
78.11
LF
15.46
102.17
117.63
LF
19.93
115.43
135.36
LF
60.22
10.76
70.98
LF
84.54
14.14
98.69
LF
99.52
17.46
116.98
LF
20.75
9.12
29.87
12
LF
23.34
10.46
33.80
LF
37.33
14.88
52.21
LF
65.45
22.27
87.71
LF
16.12
7.73
23.85
LF
19.75
9.19
28.94
LF
LF
16.73
20.18
8.14
10.09
24.88
30.26
LF
28.15
9.52
37.67
LF
LF
29.05
2.63
10.15
6.13
39.20
8.76
LF
5.34
13.44
18.77
LF
10.50
16.27
26.77
LF
21.66
36.20
57.87
LF
36.51
133.22
169.74
LF
52.42
186.05
238.46
LF
44.64
7.10
51.74
LF
68.09
11.53
79.62
LF
51.93
8.57
60.50
LF
17.06
7.86
24.92
LF
27.96
13.62
41.58
LF
44.76
21.81
66.57
LF
2.51
5.61
8.11
LF
5.01
9.56
14.57
LF
8.92
15.93
24.86
LF
20.21
36.07
56.27
SF
5.26
7.92
13.19
SF
7.24
10.76
18.00
SF
6.53
9.74
16.28
SF
10.72
15.77
26.49
SF
4.88
7.28
12.16
SF
6.38
9.55
15.92
SF
7.90
11.55
19.46
SF
9.06
4.36
13.42
13
SF
5.03
2.44
7.48
SF
4.93
2.24
7.17
SF
5.64
2.83
8.47
SF
5.41
3.19
8.60
SF
7.22
3.99
11.21
SF
11.34
5.63
16.96
SF
2.09
2.09
4.18
SF
3.15
3.10
6.25
SF
2.74
1.11
3.85
SF
4.45
1.59
6.04
SF
SF
1.57
1.72
4.21
4.48
5.78
6.20
SF
1.33
1.42
2.76
SF
1.90
2.01
3.91
SF
1.70
1.79
3.48
SF
1.79
1.92
3.71
SF
0.12
1.37
1.50
SF
0.47
1.32
1.79
85 Hardener, chemical
SF
0.25
0.07
0.32
SF
0.30
0.47
0.77
SYCA
10.10
20.54
30.64
SYCA
7.22
13.25
20.47
LF
24.38
57.02
81.40
LF
26.99
66.40
93.39
SF
SF
SF
CF
0.06
0.58
0.64
0.04
0.24
0.28
0.16
0.45
0.60
5.06
21.31
26.37
SF
5.79
13.72
19.51
SF
8.16
15.81
23.97
SF
6.93
14.38
21.31
14
SF
10.71
16.23
26.95
SF
0.19
1.01
1.20
SF
0.50
1.63
2.13
SF
1.99
3.46
5.45
SF
4.28
7.07
11.36
SF
15.98
8.58
24.56
SF
4.70
5.19
9.89
SF
5.74
5.89
11.63
SF
8.91
6.58
15.50
SF
4.99
5.61
10.60
SF
6.79
6.17
12.96
SF
12.15
8.57
20.72
SF
13.64
9.10
22.74
SF
9.39
10.72
20.11
SF
10.89
13.53
24.42
SF
9.89
11.77
21.66
SF
13.52
13.15
26.67
SF
11.59
15.40
26.99
SF
19.47
19.12
38.58
SF
28.60
28.17
56.77
SF
8.12
9.65
17.77
SF
8.49
12.18
20.66
SF
5.95
7.19
13.14
SF
4.17
7.72
11.89
SF
4.23
7.74
11.97
15
SF
26.19
26.78
52.97
SF
8.43
17.10
25.53
SF
3.43
6.64
10.07
SF
5.74
9.08
14.82
SF
3.23
2.77
6.00
SF
2.30
3.03
5.32
SF
25.01
1.27
26.28
SF
4.39
0.63
5.02
SF
10.15
2.13
12.28
SF
15.05
1.37
16.42
SF
9.87
1.38
11.25
SF
0.07
0.27
0.34
SF
0.22
0.78
1.00
SF
0.17
0.60
0.77
SF
0.24
0.25
0.49
SF
0.20
1.16
1.36
SF
0.62
1.19
1.81
SF
0.07
0.26
0.33
SF
0.07
0.30
0.37
SF
0.22
0.51
0.73
SF
18.36
10.51
28.87
SF
27.68
10.65
38.33
SF
23.16
7.80
30.96
EACH
69.76
28.37
98.13
EACH
166.16
59.28
225.44
16
EACH
282.31
65.60
347.91
EACH
172.08
67.96
240.04
EACH
1,277.31
252.01
1,529.32
EACH
2,329.58
463.82
2,793.40
EACH
2,763.24
603.67
3,366.91
EACH
931.07
1,611.83
2,542.90
EACH
1,369.85
2,026.41
3,396.26
EACH
1,274.41
1,686.22
2,960.63
EACH
1,592.95
1,686.22
3,279.17
EACH
508.10
342.23
850.34
EACH
967.17
265.54
1,232.71
EACH
1,580.09
369.24
1,949.33
EACH
2,022.29
504.20
2,526.49
EACH
1,803.16
173.12
1,976.28
EACH
2,225.96
197.84
2,423.80
Kg
0.27
3.41
3.68
Kg
0.33
3.44
3.78
M2
148.95
36.62
185.57
M2
160.93
40.01
200.94
M2
57.05
40.99
98.04
M2
97.06
44.27
141.34
M2
66.18
49.30
115.47
M2
78.27
88.65
166.92
M2
27.92
17.49
45.42
M2
31.55
26.23
57.78
M2
28.91
24.53
53.45
M2
34.18
36.62
70.80
M2
111.03
80.34
191.37
M2
130.16
82.52
212.68
M2
142.57
100.45
243.03
M2
249.76
83.40
333.15
M2
316.60
103.84
420.44
M2
79.14
22.41
101.56
17
M2
57.16
48.53
105.68
M2
13.85
7.49
21.34
M2
12.15
18.09
30.23
M2
27.15
29.30
56.45
M2
92.12
28.42
120.55
M2
51.89
39.79
91.68
M2
36.83
14.98
51.80
M2
34.40
21.91
56.32
M2
20.66
15.90
36.57
M2
835.45
125.70
961.16
M2
1,214.71
177.07
1,391.78
M2
953.08
130.07
1,083.15
M2
1,346.62
188.00
1,534.62
SF
4.16
4.11
8.27
SF
4.42
4.21
8.63
SF
5.46
4.37
9.83
SF
6.45
6.08
12.53
SF
4.37
4.21
8.58
SF
5.10
4.94
10.04
SF
6.76
5.82
12.58
SF
7.38
6.40
13.78
LF
32.55
6.60
39.16
202 Grout
CY
212.90
78.00
290.90
18
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
7.74
13.39
(5)
CSI DIVISION 7, 8 & 9 ROOFING &
MISCLANEOUS ITEMS
GENERAL ROOFING ITEMS
1
SF
5.65
SF
3.09
3.95
7.04
SF
5.25
10.48
15.74
Ditto 6 x 24
SF
5.48
11.68
17.16
SF
1.42
1.86
3.29
SF
3.30
1.41
4.71
SQ
95.78
71.52
167.30
SQ
111.17
77.85
189.02
SQ
148.69
229.23
377.92
SF
132.16
229.22
361.38
SQ
138.77
229.35
368.12
SQ
355.94
119.52
475.46
SQ
46.97
70.65
117.61
SQ
66.75
73.82
140.57
SQ
135.44
222.66
358.10
SF
1.38
1.75
3.13
SF
2.20
2.60
4.80
SF
0.55
0.60
1.15
SF
1.12
1.10
2.23
SF
1.83
1.83
3.66
SF
1.55
1.56
3.11
SF
2.97
2.98
5.96
SF
1.82
1.82
3.64
EACH
608.57
103.51
712.08
EACH
958.96
157.75
1,116.71
LF
2.01
0.25
2.26
LF
2.11
0.36
2.48
LF
1.13
2.82
3.95
29 Ditto 6
LF
1.31
2.69
4.00
30 Ditto rectangular 3 x 3
LF
1.42
2.59
4.01
31 Ditto 4 x 4
LF
1.70
2.77
4.46
19
EACH
99.91
102.90
202.81
33 Ditto 6
EACH
204.11
117.85
321.96
EACH
111.49
102.90
214.39
35 Ditto 6
EACH
168.30
126.83
295.13
FLT
1,241.47
515.38
1,756.85
RISER
90.53
54.95
145.49
LF
41.09
12.83
53.92
LF
18.34
11.60
29.93
EACH
1,692.93
527.96
2,220.89
LF
1.60
4.19
5.79
LF
2.24
3.62
5.86
LF
2.61
3.62
6.23
SF
8.99
18.38
27.36
SF
7.14
18.38
25.52
46 Screens, bird
SF
1.51
2.25
3.75
EACH
1,740.00
582.23
2,322.24
EACH
119.22
92.02
211.23
EACH
304.01
92.02
396.03
EACH
2,145.29
124.18
2,269.47
EACH
209.09
104.60
313.70
SF
0.20
0.54
0.74
SF
0.19
0.29
0.48
SF
0.45
0.35
0.80
LF
0.04
0.81
0.85
LF
0.06
0.81
0.87
LF
0.29
0.83
1.12
LF
0.07
0.89
0.97
LF
1.98
1.80
3.78
60 Latex/acrylic, x
LF
0.11
1.11
1.23
61 Latex/acrylic, x
LF
0.25
1.35
1.60
62 Latex/acrylic, x3/4
LF
0.34
1.50
1.84
63 Joint filler
LF
0.21
0.18
0.38
64 Joint filler 1
LF
0.27
0.23
0.50
20
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
SF
3.45
3.62
7.07
(6)
CSI DIVISION 4, 8, 9 & 10 INTERNALS
WALLS / DOORS / CEILINGS / FLOORS /
INTERIORS / GLASS
Interior gypsum board (both sides painted) on
metal studding 16 O.C. with 3 thick sound
insulation with rubber skirting board (NR)
Ditto 1 hour rated
SF
3.96
4.43
8.39
SF
4.83
5.00
9.83
SF
4.74
10.24
14.99
SF
6.26
10.80
17.06
SF
4.39
8.43
12.82
SF
4.66
5.26
9.92
SF
8.76
6.59
15.35
SF
9.50
7.96
17.45
SF
6.98
4.71
11.69
SF
8.92
7.21
16.13
SF
0.07
0.32
0.39
SF
0.16
0.58
0.74
EACH
675.36
308.98
984.34
EACH
789.53
321.96
1,111.49
EACH
820.88
270.69
1,091.57
EACH
981.47
270.69
1,252.16
21
EACH
1,095.98
320.77
1,416.76
EACH
1,208.40
320.75
1,529.15
SF
14.78
8.92
23.70
SF
28.64
8.92
37.56
SF
14.60
6.59
21.20
EACH
477.50
164.20
641.69
EACH
444.49
151.49
595.97
EACH
554.69
201.97
756.66
SF
1.47
1.21
2.67
SF
2.74
1.28
4.01
SF
3.23
1.93
5.17
SF
1.26
1.47
2.73
SF
2.53
2.68
5.21
SF
1.36
1.28
2.64
SF
1.34
1.11
2.45
SF
2.35
3.80
6.15
SF
1.59
1.53
3.12
SF
1.59
1.25
2.84
SF
0.44
1.23
1.67
SF
0.48
1.23
1.71
SF
2.68
1.23
3.91
SY
15.86
10.74
26.60
SF
5.50
4.02
9.53
SF
3.78
1.11
4.89
SF
1.96
2.23
4.18
SF
2.75
2.10
4.85
44 VCT, 12x12x1/4
SF
1.10
0.44
1.54
SF
1.59
1.18
2.77
SF
5.04
5.60
10.64
SF
8.65
6.33
14.98
22
SF
4.13
4.51
8.64
SF
4.60
4.91
9.51
SF
4.71
5.06
9.78
SF
4.14
1.44
5.57
52 Ditto
SF
4.60
1.44
6.03
53 Ditto
SF
5.16
1.66
6.82
SF
2.38
2.38
55 Ditto Maximum
SF
6.01
6.01
SF
4.27
6.03
10.31
SF
4.14
5.45
9.59
SF
5.25
1.82
7.07
SF
4.99
10.67
15.66
SF
6.06
3.30
9.36
SF
6.18
3.46
9.64
SF
10.71
4.58
15.29
SF
1.54
0.50
2.04
SF
1.63
3.97
5.61
SF
3.34
4.01
7.35
SF
0.22
0.64
0.86
SF
0.30
0.27
0.57
SF
0.21
0.28
0.49
LF
41.36
15.71
57.08
LF
26.55
27.30
53.85
LF
102.50
35.10
137.60
SY
20.05
7.83
27.88
SY
11.63
7.83
19.46
SY
12.92
6.59
19.51
SY
45.73
7.70
53.42
SY
21.10
8.80
29.90
SF
5.70
2.43
8.13
SF
8.93
30.84
39.77
79 Olefine, 24 oz.
SF
2.27
1.11
3.38
80 Indoor - outdoor
SF
1.71
0.99
2.69
81 Felt padding
SF
0.45
0.21
0.66
SF
0.60
0.21
0.81
23
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
(7)
CSI DIVISION 11, 13 & 14 MATERIAL
HANDLING EQUIPMENT
SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT
1
EA
74.78
42.65
117.43
EA
7,093.28
175.65
7,268.92
EA
6,154.96
554.32
6,709.28
EA
959.87
573.09
1,532.96
EACH
2,450.59
209.07
2,659.66
EACH
5,418.51
202.80
5,621.31
LF
224.02
117.03
341.05
LF
186.92
117.03
303.95
LF
170.73
117.03
287.76
LF
147.94
74.36
222.30
LF
195.19
195.19
EACH
77.42
33.65
111.07
LF
491.70
491.70
EACH
6,792.86
348.09
7,140.95
EACH
666.31
670.79
1,337.10
EACH
1,078.60
107.69
1,186.30
RISER
336.47
112.90
449.37
RISER
355.17
107.91
463.08
EACH
56,329.34
56,329.34
EACH
60,441.88
60,441.88
EACH
81,154.13
81,154.13
EACH
203,633.06
203,633.06
EACH
250,740.35
250,740.35
EACH
288,251.70
288,251.70
24
EACH
348,568.97
348,568.97
EACH
8,141.58
69.00
8,210.58
EACH
8,962.86
69.00
9,031.86
EACH
5,282.74
69.00
5,351.75
EACH
4,710.73
69.00
4,779.74
EACH
2,871.20
2,871.20
EACH
3,100.61
3,100.61
LF
LF
EACH
26.40
17.19
7,825.76
69.00
69.10
-
95.40
86.29
7,825.76
EACH
15,926.75
15,926.75
EACH
24,662.78
24,662.78
EACH
18,678.45
18,678.45
EACH
21,477.42
21,477.42
EACH
22,288.49
22,288.49
Floor
132,598.27
132,598.27
Floor
136,710.82
136,710.82
Floor
145,569.00
145,569.00
LF
22.62
12.29
34.91
LF
25.05
14.77
39.82
LF
42.01
16.57
58.57
SF
9.35
2.57
11.92
th
25
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
LF
6.61
8.96
15.58
(8)
CSI DIVISION 15 PLUMBING & FIRE
PROTECTION
CS A53 1 diameter schedule 40 including
fittings / hangars and erection n/e 20 from FFL
(4 fitting per 100 of pipe, valves not included)
Ditto 2:
LF
9.58
14.10
23.68
Ditto 4
LF
19.71
35.35
55.06
Ditto 6
LF
37.82
73.79
111.61
EACH
2,433.62
532.97
2,966.59
EACH
3,988.26
576.87
4,565.13
EACH
2,559.60
906.65
3,466.25
EACH
492.91
158.02
650.93
EACH
1,560.02
215.69
1,775.71
EACH
8,374.36
1,236.48
9,610.84
EACH
14,875.93
2,345.02
17,220.95
EACH
15,540.22
2,345.02
17,885.24
EACH
23,764.46
3,273.03
27,037.48
LF
3.76
1.54
5.30
LF
3.93
1.83
5.76
16 Ditto 2
LF
5.41
2.11
7.52
17 Ditto 4
LF
14.35
2.96
17.32
18 Ditto 6
LF
24.39
5.20
29.59
LF
1.39
4.40
5.79
LF
2.23
4.40
6.62
21 Ditto 1
LF
3.13
4.86
7.99
22 Ditto 2
LF
8.89
7.71
16.60
EACH
349.03
260.83
609.87
EACH
1,098.41
625.76
1,724.16
EACH
5,730.95
1,606.40
7,337.36
EACH
10,338.47
1,965.05
12,303.52
EACH
1,984.12
703.51
2,687.63
EACH
4,413.61
1,092.26
5,505.87
26
EACH
285.24
265.86
551.10
EACH
158.18
150.90
309.09
EACH
224.08
225.92
450.00
EACH
485.30
338.88
824.18
EACH
208.52
150.63
359.15
EACH
721.10
556.96
1,278.07
EACH
663.16
356.61
1,019.76
EACH
205.16
119.76
324.92
EACH
1,209.74
975.63
2,185.37
EACH
147.00
244.55
391.55
EACH
118.85
250.82
369.67
EACH
349.03
388.76
737.80
41 2 diameter
LF
3.82
8.56
12.38
42 Ditto 3
LF
6.18
8.56
14.74
43 Ditto 4
LF
8.24
8.56
16.80
44 Ditto 6
LF
11.85
13.02
24.87
45 Ditto 8
LF
21.53
15.98
37.51
46 Ditto 10
LF
32.47
18.28
50.75
47 Ditto 12
LF
54.12
22.85
76.97
LF
0.87
5.60
6.47
LF
1.03
5.88
6.91
50 Ditto 1
LF
1.13
7.77
8.90
51 Ditto 2
LF
1.62
9.55
11.17
52 Ditto 3
LF
2.90
10.34
13.24
53 Ditto 4
LF
3.80
12.69
16.48
27
54 Ditto 6
LF
6.55
15.98
22.54
55 Ditto 8
LF
8.03
17.70
25.73
56 diameter
LF
9.00
7.88
16.88
57 Ditto
LF
15.27
9.60
24.87
58 Ditto 1
LF
24.50
14.28
38.78
59 diameter r
LF
9.58
7.88
17.46
60 Ditto
LF
16.24
9.60
25.84
61 Ditto 1
LF
26.88
14.28
41.16
LF
2.44
6.58
9.03
LF
4.54
6.66
11.20
LF
5.71
5.77
11.48
LF
8.00
7.14
15.14
LF
24.32
7.14
31.46
LF
0.75
5.55
6.30
LF
0.99
6.10
7.09
LF
8.00
4.97
12.97
LF
11.08
7.45
18.52
LF
14.80
8.96
23.76
LF
5.56
5.88
11.44
LF
8.03
8.00
16.03
LF
20.97
10.85
31.81
LF
10.76
13.07
23.84
LF
15.50
16.21
31.71
77 Ditto 4
LF
21.37
21.42
42.80
LF
2.00
9.28
11.27
LF
2.40
11.03
13.44
LF
5.05
18.76
23.82
LF
10.43
26.27
36.70
LF
2.40
10.11
12.51
LF
4.38
13.79
18.17
EACH
41.64
30.39
72.03
EACH
41.65
31.98
73.63
28
EACH
130.10
79.76
209.86
EACH
83.32
114.10
197.42
LF
12.75
9.58
22.33
LF
17.64
10.91
28.55
LF
19.02
9.53
28.55
LF
23.89
12.67
36.56
LF
35.03
13.92
48.94
SF
1.57
2.16
3.73
SF
1.54
1.83
3.37
SF
1.39
1.83
3.22
SF
2.06
2.43
4.49
SF
1.74
2.14
3.88
SF
1.74
2.02
3.75
SF
1.76
2.20
3.96
SF
1.60
1.96
3.56
SF
1.55
1.82
3.37
SF
9.64
9.64
EACH
1,219.75
418.84
1,638.59
EACH
13,456.02
3,313.14
16,769.16
EACH
37,503.21
3,698.12
41,201.33
EACH
919.87
147.53
1,067.40
EACH
3,372.86
1,229.44
4,602.29
EACH
427.32
274.13
701.45
EACH
333.87
137.07
470.94
EACH
536.69
376.21
912.90
EACH
725.60
499.11
1,224.70
EACH
746.87
403.79
1,150.66
EACH
1,185.97
647.07
1,833.04
EACH
347.79
188.10
535.89
29
EACH
34,403.17
34,403.17
EACH
84,781.92
84,781.92
EACH
26,809.06
26,809.06
EACH
19,574.86
19,574.86
EACH
43,871.71
43,871.71
EACH
109,035.37
109,035.37
EACH
556,828.54
556,828.54
EACH
6,879.41
6,879.41
EACH
41,565.90
41,565.90
EACH
30,527.45
30,527.45
EACH
100,288.01
100,288.01
EACH
10,899.86
10,899.86
EACH
16,637.41
16,637.41
EACH
2,563.37
2,563.37
EACH
4,374.91
4,374.91
EACH
8,427.24
8,427.24
EACH
31,731.87
31,731.87
EACH
14,703.22
14,703.22
EACH
26,974.30
26,974.30
EACH
6,079.49
6,079.49
EACH
12,802.15
12,802.15
EACH
63,051.63
63,051.63
EACH
2,237.14
2,237.14
EACH
13,276.81
13,276.81
EACH
4,904.74
4,904.74
PUMPS
30
EACH
6,512.69
6,512.69
EACH
7,961.18
7,961.18
EACH
10,236.32
10,236.32
EACH
1,349.15
1,349.15
EACH
2,132.30
2,132.30
EACH
3,520.04
3,520.04
EACH
5,037.22
5,037.22
EACH
13,225.28
13,225.28
EACH
17,154.99
17,154.99
EACH
1,362.06
1,362.06
EACH
1,660.68
1,660.68
EACH
1,823.80
1,823.80
EACH
4,780.88
4,780.88
EACH
12,826.68
12,826.68
EACH
37,056.08
37,056.08
EACH
65,296.12
65,296.12
EACH
3,497.97
3,497.97
EACH
5,693.40
5,693.40
EACH
7,773.53
7,773.53
EACH
9,810.73
9,810.73
EACH
12,258.81
12,258.81
EACH
14,242.13
14,242.13
EACH
1,921.92
1,921.92
EACH
2,261.66
2,261.66
EACH
3,391.26
3,391.26
EACH
3,328.70
843.40
4,172.10
EACH
4,774.74
890.12
5,664.86
EACH
12,107.95
2,230.20
14,338.15
EACH
198.69
151.22
349.91
EACH
1,159.03
821.27
1,980.30
EACH
3,482.01
1,925.29
5,407.30
SUM
5,089.95
5,089.95
SUM
5,948.51
5,948.51
SUM
7,726.92
7,726.92
SUM
2,023.72
2,023.72
SUM
561.74
561.74
LBS
2.63
3.79
6.42
31
LBS
2.60
3.17
5.77
LBS
2.19
2.90
5.10
LF
2.17
4.18
6.35
LF
2.83
5.02
7.85
LF
4.15
7.25
11.40
LF
4.24
9.56
13.80
LF
5.22
13.43
18.65
EACH
104.26
67.62
171.88
EACH
147.18
98.35
245.53
EACH
176.60
129.10
305.70
LF
15.45
18.44
33.89
LF
17.79
27.30
45.09
LF
23.62
34.43
58.05
LF
31.65
41.92
73.57
EACH
244.07
117.40
361.47
EACH
267.37
130.32
397.70
EACH
302.95
145.08
448.03
EACH
770.33
336.87
1,107.20
EACH
1,522.07
442.60
1,964.67
EACH
156.99
43.16
200.15
EACH
264.92
55.33
320.25
EACH
117.75
102.66
220.41
EACH
126.32
141.38
267.70
EACH
280.86
280.32
561.18
EACH
415.78
404.49
820.27
EACH
133.68
102.66
236.34
EACH
164.35
141.38
305.73
32
EACH
322.57
274.16
596.73
EACH
450.12
404.49
854.61
EACH
60.10
25.45
85.55
EACH
84.64
30.48
115.12
EACH
111.62
65.98
177.60
EACH
196.24
110.40
306.63
LF
14.10
14.10
LF
21.47
21.47
LF
9.76
9.76
LF
10.30
10.30
EACH
50.60
25.07
75.67
EACH
79.07
39.40
118.47
EACH
103.60
50.14
153.74
218 CS tee
EACH
8.75
26.85
35.60
219 CS tee
EACH
11.29
26.85
38.15
220 CS tee 1
EACH
18.28
26.85
45.14
221 CS tee 2
EACH
20.49
51.33
71.82
222 CS tee 3
EACH
25.43
78.19
103.62
223 CS tee 4
EACH
36.02
72.21
108.22
224 CS tee 6
EACH
61.36
153.99
215.35
EACH
114.90
102.65
217.55
EACH
40.13
76.99
117.12
LF
3.26
6.18
9.43
LF
4.85
7.14
11.99
229 Ditto 2
LF
6.61
9.55
16.16
230 Ditto 3
LF
12.25
11.70
23.95
231 Ditto 4
LF
16.63
14.33
30.96
232 Ditto 6
LF
20.59
16.90
37.49
40.11
27.18
67.29
49.88
34.78
84.66
41.20
31.52
72.73
50.96
42.39
93.35
Metric Values
233 Supply & install CI ductile pipe in trench 100
mm
234 Ditto 150 mm
235 Supply & install CI ductile pipe on walls / racks
100 mm
236 Ditto 150 mm ditto
237 Supply & install copper pipe 15 mm with cap
joints on walls / racks
238 Ditto 25 mm
14.63
10.87
25.50
18.97
17.49
36.46
239 Ditto 50 mm
47.27
37.17
84.44
16.81
13.04
29.85
33
25.16
16.95
42.11
244 Ditto 50 mm
53.66
39.23
92.89
2.64
11.15
13.79
3.30
11.89
15.19
249 Ditto 40 mm
6.34
19.18
25.52
250 Ditto 50 mm
7.97
26.62
34.59
4.17
7.55
11.72
7.32
8.48
15.80
255 Ditto 50 mm
14.04
11.90
25.94
3.20
6.57
9.78
5.04
7.18
12.22
260 Ditto 50 mm
8.30
8.48
16.78
9.93
12.90
22.83
16.38
17.58
33.96
265 Ditto 25 mm
24.86
21.42
46.28
266 Ditto 40 mm
44.46
26.31
70.77
267 Ditto 50 mm
75.24
31.10
106.34
11.65
13.42
25.06
19.08
18.51
37.60
270 Ditto 25 mm
29.02
22.57
51.58
271 Ditto 40 mm
50.65
27.87
78.52
272 Ditto 50 mm
82.06
32.03
114.09
34
Description
Unit
Material
Labor
Total
(9)
CSI DIVISION 16 ELECTRICAL
SWITCHGEAR / CLEAN ROOM ITEMS
1
EACH
46,707.30
46,707.30
EACH
86,865.70
86,865.70
EACH
17,995.35
17,995.35
EACH
6,527.12
6,527.12
EACH
8,277.75
8,277.75
EACH
5,475.46
5,475.46
EACH
23,168.26
23,168.26
EACH
32,440.44
32,440.44
EACH
38,777.24
38,777.24
EACH
2,996.39
2,996.39
EACH
4,587.29
4,587.29
EACH
4,753.70
4,753.70
EACH
3,593.14
569.74
4,162.88
14 Ditto 75 KVA
EACH
4,420.58
797.65
5,218.23
EACH
5,044.00
968.57
6,012.57
EACH
5,610.74
1,150.88
6,761.62
EACH
7,106.93
1,732.03
8,838.96
EACH
11,051.46
2,392.94
13,444.39
EACH
139.41
85.47
224.88
20 Ditto 1 HP
EACH
199.49
85.47
284.96
21 Ditto 2.50 HP
EACH
260.70
85.47
346.16
22 Ditto 5 HP
EACH
311.71
125.34
437.05
23 Ditto 10 HP
EACH
481.74
125.34
607.08
24 Ditto 25 HP
EACH
889.79
165.24
1,055.03
25 Ditto 50 HP
EACH
1,983.59
188.02
2,171.61
26 Emergency generator to 30 KW
EACH
26,157.30
26,157.30
EACH
48,520.35
48,520.35
EACH
124,723.04
124,723.04
EACH
259,499.08
259,499.08
35
EACH
306,592.00
306,592.00
EACH
11,351.10
1,017.98
12,369.08
EACH
314.77
104.26
419.03
EACH
305.00
136.14
441.14
EACH
314.77
104.26
419.03
EACH
314.77
136.14
450.90
LF
0.51
1.36
1.87
37 Ditto # 10
LF
1.08
1.94
3.03
38 Ditto # 8
LF
2.10
3.64
5.74
LF
2.70
5.49
8.20
LF
6.99
7.45
14.44
LF
20.32
14.54
34.86
LF
30.22
18.10
48.32
LF
66.78
35.52
102.29
LF
130.79
75.21
206.00
LF
3.16
6.38
9.54
LF
8.00
9.36
17.36
LF
47.87
21.73
69.60
LF
222.30
105.10
327.40
LF
5.43
7.92
13.35
LF
10.11
11.18
21.29
LF
54.05
26.29
80.34
LF
143.08
73.86
216.94
LF
24.07
21.79
45.85
36
EACH
66.50
110.39
176.88
EACH
84.05
113.81
197.86
EACH
121.65
118.39
240.04
EACH
156.78
132.46
289.24
EACH
149.08
155.77
304.86
EACH
770.45
237.94
1,008.39
EACH
490.08
236.83
726.91
EACH
633.81
268.60
902.41
EACH
15.26
6.87
22.13
LF
14.81
7.82
22.63
SUM
4,465.28
4,465.28
SUM
66,491.31
66,491.31
SUM
10,821.61
10,821.61
SUM
140,668.76
140,668.76
SUM
5,856.12
5,856.12
SUM
58,195.14
58,195.14
SUM
4,257.88
4,257.88
SUM
62,465.23
62,465.23
EACH
28.67
97.15
125.82
EACH
407.74
209.85
617.59
EACH
23.18
68.68
91.86
EACH
32.94
79.73
112.66
EACH
28.06
83.40
111.46
EACH
14,030.28
14,030.28
EACH
17,690.35
17,690.35
EACH
13,420.26
13,420.26
80 Closed circuit TV
EACH
4,382.61
4,382.61
EACH
4,923.79
4,923.79
37
EACH
8,321.04
102.40
8,423.44
EACH
1,622.74
128.01
1,750.76
EACH
8,706.00
153.62
8,859.61
LF
43.83
10.24
54.07
EACH
1,044.72
51.21
1,095.93
EACH
3,671.91
76.80
3,748.71
EACH
229.79
102.40
332.19
EACH
3,849.59
153.62
4,003.21
EACH
4,086.49
153.62
4,240.11
EACH
5,294.67
204.82
5,499.49
EACH
3,882.18
98.00
3,980.18
EACH
7,072.93
195.99
7,268.91
94 Ditto vertical 46 x 4 x 4
EACH
6,551.53
195.99
6,747.52
95 HEPA filter 2 x 4
EACH
833.11
48.99
882.11
96 Ditto 2 x 3
EACH
799.12
48.99
848.11
97 ULPA filter 2 x 4
EACH
957.80
48.99
1,006.79
98 Ditto 2 x 3
EACH
912.45
48.99
961.45
EACH
3,910.51
195.99
4,106.50
EACH
7,787.02
195.99
7,983.01
EACH
1,059.81
98.00
1,157.81
102 Ditto 16 x 1 6 x 2
EACH
1,779.56
98.00
1,877.56
103 Ditto 2 x 2 2
EACH
2,187.62
98.00
2,285.62
EACH
2,406.38
100.28
2,506.66
105 Ditto 12 x 12 x 16
EACH
2,465.33
100.28
2,565.61
106 Ditto 16 x 16 x 16
EACH
2,561.67
100.28
2,661.94
EACH
13,318.42
123.06
13,441.48
EACH
9,317.22
123.06
9,440.29
EACH
1,643.55
123.06
1,766.62
EACH
1,696.45
104.08
1,800.53
EACH
3,747.72
104.08
3,851.81
EACH
2,960.43
104.08
3,064.52
EACH
429.24
104.08
533.32
EACH
881.12
104.08
985.20
115 6 ditto
EACH
1,752.54
104.08
1,856.62
EACH
386.10
52.04
438.14
117 2 ditto
EACH
589.93
78.06
667.99
EACH
88.43
52.04
140.47
EACH
236.18
78.06
314.25
120 4 ditto
EACH
1,004.07
78.06
1,082.13
38
EACH
561.89
52.04
613.93
EACH
746.30
52.04
798.35
LF
1.39
1.39
LF
1.86
1.86
125 1 ditto
LF
3.68
3.68
LF
4.48
4.48
127 2 ditto
LF
5.91
5.91
128 4 ditto
LF
18.55
18.55
2.29
2.29
LF
131 2 ditto
LF
7.43
7.43
132 4 ditto
LF
23.96
23.96
133 6 ditto
LF
42.46
42.46
13,874.65
208.17
14,082.82
EACH
EACH
12,108.10
78.06
12,186.16
EACH
20,236.60
78.06
20,314.66
EACH
27,214.37
104.08
27,318.45
EACH
4,254.61
104.08
4,358.69
EACH
5,554.17
104.08
5,658.26
EACH
5,540.15
208.17
5,748.32
EACH
7,414.56
208.17
7,622.72
3.69
4.21
7.90
144 50 mm
7.23
5.98
13.21
145 75 mm
13.36
9.31
22.67
146 100 mm
22.20
14.30
36.50
LF
105.00
12.50
127.50
148 9 wide
LF
125.00
15.50
140.50
149 12 wide
LF
145.00
17.00
162.00
150 18 wide
LF
175.00
20.00
195.00
151 24 wide
LF
235.00
27.00
262.00
152 6 x 6 x 6 deep
Each
6,750.00
1,550.00
8,300.00
Each
10,500.00
2,250.00
12,750.00
LF
12.50
2.70
15.20
39
LF
55.50
67.00
122.50
SF
1.30
1.30
2.60
SF
1.65
1.40
3.05
LF
45.00
22.00
67.00
LF
65.00
42.00
107.00
LF
105.00
64.00
169.00
NOTE: To determine man hour units from the above data source divided labor value by
$53.00, this is an average bill out rate for skilled and unskilled labor (Union / Non Union
Merit Shop), to determine construction rental equipment multiply install value by 6.5%;
i.e., the install value contains 6.5% for construction equipment, labor unit man hours
should be adjusted accordingly.
40
SECTION B 5
GENERAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATING DATA /
CALIBRATION FACTORS (LOCATION FACTORS / PRODUCTIVITY)
The following general cost estimating data is applicable to City Location Factors, Country Location
Factors (North America and International Locations) Engineering / Architectural CM and Validation
Fees, Labor Rates (union and non union), Sales Tax, Inflation Rates, Bricks, Carbon Steel Pipe,
Rebar, Ready Mix Concrete, L.W. Concrete Blocks, R.C. Pipe, Copper Pipe, Conduit, Stainless Steel
pipe, Average hourly labor rates, Average Productivity Modifiers and General Conditions.
Location Factor
.84
.86
.83
.86
.88
.85
1.27
1.24
1.22
1.15 1.30
1.20 1.30
1.25 1.60
.86
.92
.87
.81
.80
1.08
1.07
1.06
1.07
1.08
1.14
1.10
Riverside
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Santa Rosa
Woody
COLORADO
Colorado Springs
Denver
Ft Collins
Gypsum
Leadville
Vail
CONNECTICUT
Hartford
New Haven
Stamford
D.C. CITY of WASHINGTON - BASE CITY
Washington D.C.
DELAWARE
Dover
Wilmington
FLORIDA
Fort Lauderdale
Jacksonville
Miami
Naples
Orlando
St. Petersburg
Tampa
GEORGIA
Atlanta
Macon
Savannah
HAWAII
Honolulu
IDAHO
Boise
Ketchum
Pocatello
Twin Falls
ILLINOIS
Chicago
Kankakee
Peoria
Rock Island
Rockford
1.06
1.07
1.07
1.20
1.12
1.11
1.04
.93
.94
.92
.91
.92
.91
1.08
1.07
1.06
1.00
.95
.96
.87
.87
.89
.88
.92
.88
.91
.93
.87
.87
1.17
.90
.89
.88
.86
1.06
.96
.95
.97
.94
INDIANA
Evansville.
Hammond
Indianapolis
South Bend
IOWA
Cedar rapids
Des Moines
Davenport
KANSAS
Topeka
Wichita
KENTUCKY
Bowling Green
Georgetown
Louisville
Paducah
LOUISIANA
New Orleans
Shreveport
MAINE
Bath
Portland.
MANITOBA
Winnipeg
MARYLAND
Baltimore
Silver Spring
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
New Bedford
Lowell
Springfield
Worcester
MICHIGAN
Detroit.
Flint
Grand Rapids.
Kalamazoo
Lansing
Saginaw
MINNESOTA
Duluth
Minneapolis
St. Paul
MISSISSIPPI
Biloxi
Canton
.96
.95
.96
.94
.88
.90
.88
.86
.85
.86
.86
.86
.86
.93
.82
.89
.87
.99
.96
.97
1.08
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
.94
.93
.93
.94
.93
.92
.94
.96
.93
.88
.86
Jackson
Tupelo
MISSOURI
Columbia
Kansas City
St. Louis
MONTANA
Butte
Missoula
NEBRASKA
Omaha
NEVADA
Las Vegas
Reno
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Concord
Manchester
NEW JERSEY
Atlantic City
Burlington
Cranbury
Ewing
Hightstown
Jersey City
Medford
Newark
New Brunswick.
Princeton
Trenton
NEW MEXICO
Albuquerque
Las Cruces
Santa Fe
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Lake George
New York City
Rochester
Saratoga Springs
Schenectady.
Syracuse
Utica
NORTH CAROLINA
Asheville
Charlotte
Raleigh / RTP
Wilmington
.86
.86
.92
.94
.95
.86
.86
.86
.99
.96
.94
.93
.97
.98
.97
.98
.98
1.03
.96
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
.87
.86
.88
1.03
1.04
.97
1.20
1.05
1.00
1.06
1.02
1.02
.89
.89
.94
.92
NORTH DAKOTA
Bismarck
Crosby
Fortuna
Fargo
Minot
OHIO
Akron
Canton
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Dayton
Lima
Toledo
Youngstown
Zanesville
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
ONTARIO
Hamilton
London
Thunder Bay
Toronto
Sarnia
Sudbury
Windsor
OREGON
Eugene
Portland
PENNSYLVANIA
Conshohocken
Erie
Newtown
Kutztown
Morrisville
New Hope
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Reading
Scranton
Yardley
York
West Chester
PUERTO RICO
San Juan
QUEBEC
.88
.89
.89
.88
.87
.91
.90
.91
.94
.88
.89
.90
.90
.89
.90
.87
.85
.99
.97
.97
1.00
.99
.98
.97
.94
.93
.99
.94
.97
.90
.97
.96
1.07
1.01
.95
.94
.98
.93
.96
.94
Alma
Kirkland
Mirabel
Montreal
Sorel
Verdun
RHODE ISLAND
Newport
Providence
SOUTH CAROLINA
Charleston
Columbia
Greenville
SOUTH DAKOTA
Rapid City
Sioux Falls
TENNESSEE
Chattanooga
Clarksville
Cleveland
Jackson
Knoxville
Memphis
Murfreesboro
Nashville
Sweetwater
TEXAS
Abilene
Amarillo
Austin
Beaumont / Port Arthur / Sabine Pass
Corpus Christi
Dallas
El Paso
Fort Worth
Houston
Kennedy
Lubbock
San Antonio
Victoria.
Waco
UTAH
Salt Lake City
VERMONT
Burlington
VIRGINIA
Chatham
Hopewell
.94
.94
.94
.95
.95
.94
.96
.97
.83
.82
.83
.84
.85
.86
.85
.85
.84
.88
.87
.84
.87
.85
.88
.88
.90
.89
.88
.91
.86
.89
.91
.87
.87
.87
.88
.89
.92
.95
.84
.90
Norfolk
Richmond
Roanoke
WASHINGTON
Bellingham
Ferndale
Seattle
Spokane
Tacoma
WEST VIRGINIA
Charleston
Huntington
Hurricane
Institute
Parkersburg
WISCONSIN
Madison
Milwaukee.
WYOMING
Casper
Cheyenne
Gillett
.85
.91
.87
.92
.92
.97
.94
.93
.89
.88
.86
.88
.86
.92
.96
.86
.86
.86
The above North American city indexes / location factors are intended for comparison objectives only.
The base / standard benchmark city is Washington, D.C; i.e. which is fixed at a value of 1.00. Built up
areas close to major cities / Suburbs outside major cities generally have a lower cost basis than major
city center costs. Remote locations, such as, Anchorage or Fairbanks, Alaska, will generally have to a
greater degree have higher prices contrasted to lower 48 major cities, due to increases in logistics
and increased shipping / transportation costs. Canadian city indexes reflect August 2008 Canadian
currency projections. The exchange rate used was: C$ 0.94 (Canadian) = $1.00 US
Country
City
Argentina
Australia
Melbourne
Location
Factor *
0.96
1.05
Construction
Productivity
1.40 -1.55
1.10 - 1.20
Perth
Sydney
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
China
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Egypt
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
India
Israel
Indonesia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Kuwait
Malaysia
Mexico
The Netherlands
New Zealand
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Romania
Russia
Poland
Calgary
Edmonton
Fort McMurray
Halifax
Montreal
Toronto
Vancouver
Beijing
Guangzhou
Shanghai
Nice
Paris
Berlin
Hamburg
Munich
Cork
Dublin
Galway
1.05
1.06
1.08
1.06
0.96
1.06
1.06
1.10 1.15
1.03
1.03
1.02
1.03
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.97
0.95
1.10
0.94
1.10
1.04
1.06
1.05
1.04
1.04
0.96
0.99
0.97
0.96
0.94
0.93
1.04
1.06
1.03
0.97
1.08
1.01
0.96
0.94
1.05
1.05
1.00
1.17
1.00
0.96
0.97
0.95
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 1.20
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
2.25
1.20
1.20
1.30 1.65
1.15
1.15
1.15
1.10 1.15
2.00 3.00
2.00 3.00
2.00 3.00
1.65
1.45 1.65
1.10 - 1.20
2.50 3.00
1.10 1.20
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.60
1.20 1.60
1.40
2.30 3.25
1.25 - 1.40
2.40 3.25
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.20
1.00 - 1.15
1.20 1.35
1.75 2.15
1.40 1.70
1.65 2.15
1.05 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
2.50 3.50
1.20 1.40
2.00 2.75
1.45 1.80
1.50 1.85
1.25 1.60
1.10
1.10
1.07
1.05
1.15
1.06
1.06
1.07
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.10 1.25
1.10 1.25
1.10 1.25
1.20
1.15 1.25
1.10
1.25 1.40
1.10
1.05
1.05
1.05 1.10
1.05 1.10
1.05 1.10
1.15 1.30
1.10 1.20
1.10 1.25
1.15 1.40
1.05 1.20
1.20 1.40
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
0.95 1.05
1.00 1.10
1.25 1.40
1.20 1.40
1.15 1.35
1.05 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.20 1.50
1.10 1.25
1.20 1.35
1.20 1.40
1.10 1.40
1.15 1.35
Portugal
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
UAE
United Kingdom
United States
Venezuela
Vietnam
Birmingham
Cambridge
Edinburgh
Liverpool
London
Manchester
Oxford
Atlanta
Boston, MA
Chicago, IL
Kalamazoo, MI
Houston, TX
Hartford, CT
Los Angeles, CA
New Brunswick,
NJ
New York City, NY
Philadelphia, PA
Phoenix, AZ
San Juan, Puerto
Rico
Raleigh / RTP, NC
St Louis, MO
Washington D C
Benchmarked
Value
0.93
1.00
0.98
0.98
0.96
0.98
0.97
1.12
1.10
0.94
0.94
0.95
0.99
1.07
1.07
1.08
1.07
1.11
1.09
1.07
0.93
1.08
1.06
0.94
0.91
1.08
1.14
1.06
1.25 1.55
1.80 2.50
1.40 1.90
1.35 1.70
1.20 1.35
1.10 1.35
1.90 3.00
1.15 1.35
1.10 1.25
1.35 1.65
1.50 2.10
1.30 2.20
1.75 2.30
1.15 1.20
1.15 1.20
1.15 1.20
1.15 1.20
1.15 1.20
1.15 1.20
1.15 1.20
1.00**
1.00**
1.00**
0.95**
0.90 1.00
1.00**
1.00**
1.00**
1.10 1.25
1.20 1.35
1.10 1.25
1.10 1.25
1.05 1.20
1.10 1.25
1.20 1.40
1.10 1.25
1.10 1.25
1.10 1.20
1.20 1.45
1.20 1.50
1.20 1.45
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.05 1.15
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.07
0.92
0.94
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.15 1.25
0.94
0.95
1.00
1.10**
1.00**
0.95**
See below
1.85
0.95**
1.00**
1.00
0.96
0.90
1.40 - 2.00
1.65 2.25
1.20 1.40
1.25 1.40
1.00
1.00
1.00
** Above Washington D.C. using a hybrid of merit shop labor (a combination of union and non-union
labor)
Puerto Rico Productivity Vs US Construction Norms
The following is based on 6 # projects ranging in value from $5 - $55 million built in the lat ten years:
Trade / Skill
Site / Civil work / U G
utilities
Masonry / external walls /
internal partitions
Structural steel
Architectural finishes
Floors / Walls / Ceilings /
Painting / Special finishes
Major Equipment Setting
Piping (process & utility)
HVAC (AHU s / Ductwork /
balancing)
Instrumentation / Electrical /
BMS
Insulation
Engineering / Design work /
CAD operations
Puerto Rico
Range
1.45 2.15
(1.75)
1.50 2.20
(1.80)
1.50 2.25
(1.80)
1.45 2.25
(1.85)
USA Norm
1.55 2.30
(1.85)
1.90 2.60
(2.15)
1.45 2.15
(1.85)
1.65 2.35
(1.90)
1.55 2.25
(1.85)
1.15 1.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Field labor for new work will average 1.75 1.95 for all trades, revamp or alteration work could be
20% - 50% more.
The all-in selling rate for a skilled worker is $36 - $38 per hour.
The all-in selling rate for an un-skilled worker is $30 - $32 per hour
10
USA Productivity Factors (versus Gulf Coast): The normal approach of comparing process /
refinery / manufacturing construction productivity is to compare various locations around the USA to
a known basis or benchmark of 1.00 or 100 for Texas Gulf Coast (open shop labor working from say
Mobile, AL in the north and south to say Corpus Christi, TX, - because there is so much historical cost
data that has been collected over the last 20 30 years, the term Gulf Coast productivity is well
known and understood term in the engineering / construction industry):
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona (Phoenix / Tucson)
Arizona
Arkansas
California (LA / Long Beach
/ SF / SD / SJ)
California
Colorado (Denver)
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida (Jacksonville /
Miami / Orlando / St P )
Florida
Georgia (Atlanta)
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois (Chicago)
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland (Baltimore)
Maryland
Massachusetts (Boston)
Massachusetts
Michigan (Detroit)
Michigan
Minnesota (Minneapolis
St Paul)
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri (St Louis)
Missouri
Union
1.10 - 1.15
1.25 1.35
1.10 - 1.15
1.10
1.15
1.20 1.30
1.05
1.00 - 1.10
1.00
1.15
1.10
1.00 1.10
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
1.05 - 1.10
1.20 - 1.30
1.20
1.15 - 1.20
1.00
1.00 - 1.10
1.00
1.10 - 1.15
1.05
1.00 - 1.15
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.00
1.05 - 1.15
1.05 1.10
1.00 1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.00 1.10
1.05 - 1.10
1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.10
1.10 - 1.20
1.10
1.30
1.25
1.20 1.30
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 1.15
1.10 - 1.25
1.10 - 1.25
1.10 1.15
1.20 1.30
1.10 1.15
1.20 - 1.30
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.20
1.05
0.90 - 1.00
1.05 1.10
1.00 1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 1.20
1.05 1.15
11
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada (LV / Reno)
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey (Newark /
Northern)
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York City
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio (Cleveland)
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania (Philadelphia
/ Pittsburgh)
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas (Dallas / Houston)
Texas (Gulf Coast) - Base
Case this includes Gulfport,
Baton Rouge, New Iberia,
Lake Charles, Beaumont,
Port Arthur, Baytown,
Texas City and Victoria:
(Note: in certain cases i.e.
large projects with a lot of
repeat / similar work
activities: productivity could
be 0.90 1.00 say an
average of 0.95)
Utah
Vermont
Virginia (Washington D.C.)
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
1.05 - 1.10
1.05
1.05
1.00 1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.15
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
1.15
1.05 1.10
1.10 - 1.20
1.20 - 1.30
1.10
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.05 - 1.10
1.05
1.05
1.05 1.10
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.20
1.15
1.30 1.40
1.10 - 1.20
1.15
1.15
1.15 1.20
1.10 - 1.15
1.15
1.15
1.20 1.30
1.05 - 1.10
1.60 1.90
1.05
0.90 - 1.00
1.05
1.00 - 1.05
1.05 - 1.10
1.00
1.10 - 1.20
1.50 2.00
1.15
1.05 - 1.10
1.15
1.10 - 1.15
1.10 - 1.20
1.10 1.15 (typically all
work is completed on
open shop basis)
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.05
1.05
1.00 - 1.05
1.05
1.05
1.10 - 1.15
1.15
1.20 - 1.30
1.15
1.15
1.00 - 1.15
1.15
1.15
12
3.5% - 7%
2.5% - 5%
4.5% - 8.5%
13
3.5% - 5.5%
4.5% - 10.5%
3.5% - 7.0%
6.5% - 15.5%
8.5% 16%
8% 16.5%
8.5% - 18%
8% - 17.5%
7.5% - 14.5%
8% - 16%
7.5% - 15%
1% - 6%
4.5% - 8.5%
7.5% - 11.5%
6.5% - 12.5%
6.5% - 12%
6.5% - 11%
6.5% - 11%
6.5% - 10.5%
5.5% - 10%
6.5% - 11.5%
7% - 12.5%
7% - 11%
7% - 10.5%
8% - 13.5%
4.5% - 7.5%
2.5% - 6%
4% - 8%
14
5.5% - 8.5%
3.5% - 7.5%
9.5% - 17.5%
4.5% - 8%
8% - 14%
4.5% - 8%
7% - 13%
5% - 12%
3.5% - 7%
6% - 12%
8% - 13%
4.5% - 7.5%
Note: These fees / percentage markups are, of course, subject to negotiation, these fees have an
accuracy of +/-20% and are dependent on clients required engineering deliverables. (Some clients
want minimal drawings and specifications, some clients require a significant amount of engineering /
design work together with 30%, 60% and 90% design reviews and specifications).
* Construction Management includes site staff, site staff employee expenses and a fee, trailers and site
accommodation are included in Division 1 / Preliminaries. Typically CM firms are charging 2%-5% fee
on the total cost of the construction effort (funds that pass through there books). EPCM firms working in
the oil / gas and power sectors may be able to charge 7% - 12% as a profit / fee due to the current high
workload in this sector.
Procurement costs, the activities related to the buy out / purchasing of all project materials, major
equipment typically falls in the range of 0.50% 1% of the TIC cost
Engineering support, i.e. home office and field support during construction, vendor drawing approvals
and Request for Information Q.A. / Q.C. submittals / shop drawings etc; typically is 1.25% - 1.75% of the
TIC cost.
# Of M.E. items
New Facility 10 - 50
50 - 100
150 - 250
Retrofit / Revamp 10 - 50
50 - 100
150 - 250
PM / PC / Procurement
M.H. s per M.E. item
15 - 25% of
15 - 25% of
15 - 25% of
15 - 25% of
15 - 25% of
15 - 25% of
A
A
A
A
A
A
Union Labor Costs: The charge / bill out rates is in the right hand column A, these rates have been
calibrated to Washington D.C. for other locations use the city location factors previously indicated.
15
Note these values should be calibrated with the previous location factors to determine the charge out
rate for each specific location. Typical uplift 60 95% (used 85% - A).
Total Fringe Benefits (Vacation, holidays, sick pay, and employer paid FICA / Unemployment
rates, BRI) is average 15 - 30% of base wage.
Supervision is average 5 - 10% of base wage.
Workers Compensation Insurance is average 15 - 20% of base wage.
Overhead and Home Office Support 15 20%.
Profit is average 10 - 15% of base wage.
Excludes small tools, typically 2 6% of total all in rate.
Excludes construction equipment / fueling and maintenance.
Excludes general conditions / Division 1 / Preliminaries (trailers and scaffold etc,) /
Excludes consumables (gases, rags and grease).
TRADE
Bricklayer
Carpenter
Electrician
Laborer, General
Operating Engineer, General
Painter, General
Plumber / Pipe fitter
Roofer
Sheet Metal Worker, General
Structural Iron Worker
Average Rate
BASE WAGE
40.14
39.17
46.46
28.88
40.65
35.36
46.32
35.06
45.80
43.75
A
ALL-IN RATE
74.27
72.37
85.94
53.42
75.22
65.42
85.68
64.86
84.74
80.93
74.29
Open Shop / Non - Union Costs: The charge / bill out rates is in the right hand column A, these
rates have been calibrated to Washington D.C. for other locations use the city location factors
previously indicated. Typical uplift 60 95% (used 85% - A).
Total Fringe Benefits (Vacation, holidays, sick pay, and employer paid FICA / Unemployment
rates, BRI) is average 15 - 30% of base wage.
Supervision is average 5 - 10% of base wage.
Workers Compensation Insurance is average 15 - 20% of base wage.
Overhead and Home Office Support 15 20%.
Profit is average 10 - 15% of base wage.
Excludes small tools, typically 2 6% of total all in rate.
Excludes construction equipment and fueling / maintenance.
Excludes general conditions / Division 1 / Preliminaries (trailers and scaffold etc,) /
Excludes consumables (gases, rags and grease).
TRADE
Bricklayer
Carpenter
BASE WAGE
30.88
32.48
16
A ALL IN
RATE
57.12
60.08
Electrician
Laborer, General
Operating Engineer, General
Painter, General
Plumber / Pipe fitter
Roofer
Sheet Metal Worker, General
Structural Iron Worker
Average Rate
37.64
20.34
30.94
25.22
37.05
27.45
31.28
32.22
69.60
37.70
57.24
46.57
68.54
50.75
57.88
59.60
56.51
State
Alabama.
Alaska.
Arizona.
Arkansas.
California.
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia.
Florida.
Georgia.
Hawaii.
Idaho.
Illinois.
Indiana.
Iowa.
Kansas.
Kentucky.
Louisiana.
Maine.
Maryland.
Massachusetts.
Michigan.
Minnesota.
Mississippi.
Missouri.
Montana.
Tax
(%)
4
0
5.6
6
7.25
2.9
6
0
5.75
6
4
4
6
6.25
6
5
5.3
6
4
5
5
5
6
6.5
7
4.225
0
State
Nebraska.
Nevada.
New Hampshire.
New Jersey.
New Mexico.
New York.
North Carolina.
North Dakota.
Ohio.
Oklahoma.
Oregon.
Pennsylvania.
Rhode Island.
South Carolina.
South Dakota.
Tennessee.
Texas.
Utah.
Vermont.
Virginia.
Washington.
West Virginia.
Wisconsin.
Wyoming.
Canada Provinces impose
QST/GST/PST & HST tax
Average Check with each
Province
17
Tax
(%)
5
6.50
0
6
5
4
4.5
5
5.5
4.5
0
6
7
6
4
7
6.25
4.65
6
5
6.5
6
5
4
Alberta
British Columbia
Manitoba
New Brunswick
Newfoundland
Northwest Territories
Nova Scotia
Nunavut
Ontario
PEI
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Yukon
5
12
12
13
13
5
13
5
13
15.5
12.5
10
5
Material /
Labor Index
Increase
5.3%
4.6%
4.6%
4.2%
2.4%
1.8%
1.8%
2.7%
2.8%
1.8%
0.7%
1.8%
3.4%
3.2%
3.1%
2.2%
1.8%
1.4%
1.5%
1.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
1.0%
1.8%
3.6%
3.7%
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
18
2007
2008
2009 (TBD)
3.9%
3.8%
2.0% - 4.5%
(A) Bricks Common / Facing Brick Unit Prices. Unit Prices are per thousand for fourteen U.S.A.
cities, delivered to site.
City
Waste
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington, D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
Discount Premium
for large for small
quantity quantity
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
5 7.5%
10 15%
Common
Brick
Facing
Brick
320.90
419.00
396.60
345.10
363.00
338.00
396.80
379.00
405.00
406.80
469.00
408.00
303.40
397.50
466.20
593.20
611.20
452.70
464.50
469.80
605.80
498.52
492.80
618.80
645.20
613.00
443.50
586.00
(B) Carbon Steel Pipe 1 diameter Schedule 40: Unit Prices are per thousand feet for fourteen
USA cities, delivered to site.
City
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
Waste
Premium
for small
quantity
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
Discount
for large
quantity
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
7 12.5%
2.5%
7 12.5%
10 15%
3,035
19
3,037
3,092
3,025
3,053
2,975
3,161
3,027
3,104
3,235
3,089
3,296
3,042
3,056
(C) Reinforcing (Rebar) Prices: Unit prices indicated below are for 10 tons delivered, cut and
bent from a rebar fabricator in the following fourteen USA cities, spec is A 36 steel (Cost per
pound $0.40).
Waste
City
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
Premium
for small
quantity
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
10 15%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
Discount
for large
quantity
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
7 10%
2.0%
7 10%
10 15%
9,225
9,129
10,370
9,206
8,790
9,642
9,400
9,201
9,126
9,522
9,290
9,454
9,217
9,979
(D) Ready Mix Concrete Unit Price Ready Mix Concrete Price per CY / 10 14 CY load: Listed
below are unit prices for ready mix concrete in the following fourteen USA cities. The prices are for
3,000 PSI and 5,000 PSI grades of concrete (1:2:4) mix 1 part - cement, 2 parts - sand and 4 parts gravel. Add a premium of 5 15% for distances greater than 25 miles from batch plant.
City
Waste
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington, D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
Discount
for large
quantity
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
Premium
for small
quantity
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
3,000 PSI
5,000 PSI
96
100
92
104
86
90
95
95
121
97
118
93
107
95
105
110
101
113
95
99
103
103
134
106
129
102
117
105
(E) Lightweight Concrete Block (8 x 8 x 16): Unit Prices are per hundred for fourteen USA
cities, delivered to site, typically delivered in 100 / 1,000 standard units.
20
City
Waste
Discount for
large quantity
Premium
For small
Quantity
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
Concrete
Block (8 x 8
x 16): 100
units
Delivered to
site
145
155
135
138
146
157
135
150
160
134
200
132
159
2.5%
5 10%
15 20%
133
(F) R.C. 24 Diameter Pipe: Unit Prices are per hundred foot for fourteen USA cities, delivered to
site, typically delivered in 20 foot standard lengths.
City
Waste
Discount for
large quantity
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
Premium
For small
Quantity
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
5 10%
15 20%
2,098
(G) Copper Pipe Type L Unit Prices. Unit Prices are per thousand feet for fourteen U.S.A. cities,
delivered to site.
21
City
Waste
Discount
for large
quantity
Premium
For small
Quantity
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
0.50Dia
Pipe per
1,000 foot
Delivered
to site
1,685
1,803
1,737
1,772
1,727
1,846
1,722
1,813
1,929
1,785
1,947
1,724
1,750
2Dia Pipe
per 1,000
foot
Delivered
to site
9,596
10,072
9,618
9,737
9,818
10,215
9,830
9,978
10,250
9,895
10,227
9,850
9,870
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
2.0%
5 10%
15 20%
1,778
9,860
(H) Galvanized Steel (Rigid) Conduit 2 diameter: Unit Prices are per thousand feet for fourteen
USA cities, delivered to site.
City
Waste
Discount for
large quantity
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
5 15%
Premium
For small
Quantity
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
15 20%
Conduit 1,000
foot Delivered
to site
5,745
6,028
5,775
5,858
5,647
6,055
5,789
5,886
6,047
5,875
6,020
5,747
5,845
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
5 15%
15 20%
5,840
(I) Stainless Steel 1 diameter: Unit Prices are per thousand feet for fourteen U.S.A. cities,
delivered to site.
22
City
Waste
Discount
for large
quantity
Premium
For small
Quantity
Atlanta
Boston
Burlington NJ
Chicago
Dallas
Los Angeles
Medford NJ
Minneapolis
New York City
Philadelphia
San Francisco
Trenton NJ
Washington,
D.C.
Wilmington DE
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
5 10%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
15 25%
304 SS
0.065 wall
Annealed
Per 1,000
foot
Delivered
to site
3,635
3,858
3,624
3,673
3,475
3,912
3,627
3,780
4,038
3,612
4,150
3,648
3,687
2.0%
5 10%
15 25%
3,628
316L SS
0.065 wall
No polish
per 1,000
foot
Delivered
to site
5,185
5,522
5,252
5,282
4,765
5,621
5,257
5,359
5,702
5,318
5,523
5,257
5,314
5,235
1.00
1.02
1.04
1.06
1.08
1.10
1.14
23
24
SECTION C 1
MAJOR EQUIPMENT (M.E.) BUDGET PRICING & MAN-HOUR
INSTALLATION VALUES
The following tables are a listing of current budgetary pricing mid 2008
and man-hour installation values related to major equipment items that
would many times be encountered on a typical process / chemical /
manufacturing type facility. The man-hour units contain direct labor hours
for receiving, storing, allocating, assembling, installing, aligning and making
ready for any required inspection / testing and (system) handover. The
major equipment (M.E.) item is assumed to be off-loaded a distance not
exceeding (n/e) 0.50 miles 0.80 km from ultimate operating location
(typically 500 feet 1,000 feet or 250 meters): All millwright installation
work documented below is to be executed by skilled journeymen
(millwrights) familiar with the type of M.E. being installed, the man-hour
units are merit shop - a hybrid of union and non-union workers. The
budgetary dollar values should be considered +/- 15% accurate, when
considering future contingency values.
The Labor Installation Units include the items listed below, note
some of these work items could be considered Preliminaries / Division 1
items:
Average
Productivity
1.25
1.00
Good Productivity
(Decent access to the
work area, a
reasonable amount of
repeat work / good
working conditions)
0.75
The following list presents the approximate cost of diverse major equipment
commonly used in refineries / chemical plants / process facilities and
manufacturing buildings. The list indicates F.O.B. equipment prices and
man-hours. Freight costs of 3 - 5% should be added to the equipment
values for North American manufactured items shipped to North American
locations and the same percentages for European manufactured equipment
shipped to European locations, note these percentages need to be
adjusted upwards for any ocean or air freight. The following is a listing of
various material adjustment values (specific to major equipment) calibrated
against carbon steel A 53, A 36, A 515 and A 285C.
The following is a listing of various material adjustment values (specific to
piping) calibrated against carbon steel A 53, A 36, A 515 and A 285C.
These adjustments could be utilized to determine various OOM budget
variables between differing material specifications (a word of warning this is
reasonable for the material content however the installation / welding
activities should separately evaluated, welding of stainless steel and other
exotic materials may require 10-35% more man hours than the welding /
installation of carbon steel piping systems).This material uplift is dependent
upon size of order, for large orders use the lower uplift.
Material
PVC (Sch 80)
CPVC (Sch 8)
Base Case - Carbon Steel
Material cost / LF for 2 Diameter A 53
(refer to above table for material cost)
C.S. Glass Lined
C.S. Kynar Lined
C.S. Polypropylene Lined (Sch 40)
Material
uplift (Low)
0.50
0.60
Material
uplift (High)
0.60
0.70
1.00
1.00
2.40
2.00
1.80
2.70
2.30
2.00
C.S. TFE
C.S. Rubber Lined
C.S. Saran Lined (Sch 40)
C.S. PVDF Lined (Sch 40)
Aluminum
S. S. 304
S. S. 316
S.S. 304 L (Sch 10)
S.S. 316 L (Sch 40)
FRP
Glass (Solid)
Inconel 625
Titanium (Sch 10)
Zirconium (Sch 10)
Alloy 20 (Sch 10)
Monel (Sch 10)
Nickle (Sch 10)
Hastelloy G
Hastelloy B
2.70
1.15
1.80
2.40
1.25
1.45
1.50
1.20
1.40
1.40
1.75
4.00
4.20
5.50
2.40
3.10
3.10
5.80
5.50
3.30
1.35
2.00
2.60
1.50
1.65
1.75
1.40
1.60
1.60
2.00
4.50
4.60
6.50
2.70
3.40
3.40
6.20
6.00
Conversion Factor
94.63 L / 20.81 Imperial Gallons
2.54 (cm)
0.09 (M2)
3.28 Lineal Feet (LF)
39.37 inches
0.84 (M2)
0.0283 m3
0.30 (M)
0.91 (M)
1.61 kilometer (km)
0.765 (M3)
1 (M2)
4.55 liters (L)
0.40 hectare (HA)
1.31 Cubic Yards:
7.646 KW
Deduct 32, then multiply by 5, then divide by 9
0.984 (long) ton
Size / Feet
Weight /
Tons
375 T
375 T
30 T
25 T
25 T
50 T
50 T
15 T
945T
40 x 40 x 25
40 x 40 x 25
160
50 x 40 x 20
135
45 x 15 x 10
45 x 12 x 7
90
Days
M.H.s
15
15
6
5
3
7
4
2
720
720
350
145
115
265
155
60
2,530
2.67
Percentage of new
major equipment
(Labor and Materials)
5% - 30%
Pressure vessels
5% - 20%
Atmospheric storage
tanks / vessels
5% - 15%
Comments
Consider any new seals,
bushings, packings, impellers,
and new motors etc.
Consider any new nozzles,
man-ways, baffles and internals;
consider any modifications or
removals of agitators.
Consider any new nozzles,
man-ways, baffles and any
internals, ladders and
walkways.
Rotating Equipment
Pressure vessels
(A) 3% - 5%
Atmospheric storage
tanks / vessels
(A) 3% - 5%
Comments
Installation
Man-hours
80
96
110
124
$ Equipment
Cost
96,500
153,600
215,750
351,000
S.S. 27 CF / 1 CY with 15
HP / 7.5 HP -2 speed drive
$50.56
$73.87
Installation
Man-hours
2.5
3.5
6.0
10.0
18.0
$ Equipment
Cost
2,750
4,500
10,800
18,300
34,030
$5,040
$7,613
$118.13
$173.25
$388.50
$568.05
$1,969
$2,625
$47
$68
$508
$735
$1.21
$2.36
Equipment
Cost
Cost per SF
Installation
Man-Hours
500 / 46.50
1,000 / 92.90
2,500 / 232.35
5,000 / 464.70
$7,245
$10,080
$15,488
$20,738
$14.58
$10.08
$6.20
$4.15
20
24
32
46
Crusher (Impact)
Production
Rate in
Tons per
Day
HP
2,000
4,000
7,500
25/30
40
50
40,000
60,000
80,000
6/8
6/8
6/8
Installatio
n Manhours
$98
$62
$43
Screw Conveyor
Diameter
HP
$ Cost per LF
$ Cost per M
4
6
9
12
5.0
7.5
10
12.5
44.63
56.18
67.73
108.36
146.37
184.28
222.18
355.43
240
340
440
HP
$ Material
Cost
Installation
Man-Hours
24
30
36
42
48
1.5
2.5
2.5 / 5.0
2.5 / 5.0
7.5
5,628
6,720
7,623
8,484
9,534
10
12
14
18
28
1,838
2,363
2,867
3,234
4,977
30
50
70
140
250
Installation
Man-Hours
Number
of
items
Installation
Man-Hours
per SFCM
4
6
8
12
16
4/6
4/6
4/6
4/6
4/6
4.00
2.40
1.60
1.20
0.64
$3,255
$5,250
$10,679
$17,220
70,000
120,000
180,000
3,948
4,977
6,363
HP
# of
items
Installation
Man-Hours
Cost
per
Gallon
$
0.5
1.0
1.5
4/6
4/6
4/6
16
20
24
57
42
36
Wind Turbines
Commercial scale wind turbines 1.5 - 2.3 MW cost $$1.6 - $2.3
million to install
Cost to power aver home wind = $40 - $60K rule of thumb turbines
under 100 KW cost $4,000 - $6,000 per Kilowatt
(2)
(A)
Material
M.H. s
25 / 19
50 / 38
100 / 76
250 / 190
$4,175
$8,751
$17,578
$44,751
6
10
16
44
$167 - $179
$219 - $235
(B)
BIN DISCHARGER C.S. Installation man-hours include unloading,
temporary warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and system check
out. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting,
brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to
productivity adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours. The
man-hour installation units exclude initial chemical charging, cooling liquids,
refrigerant / anti freeze chemicals, M.E. passivation and cleaning (pickling)
and M.E. identification / Stenciling & subsequent tagging.
(C)
H.P.
$ / H.P.
0.5 2.5
2.5 5.0
5.0 10.0
$5,497
$2,919
$2,126
Cubic Yards /
M3
Cost
Installation
Man-hours
$ Cost per
Cubic Yard
20 / 15
100 / 76
250 / 190
$9,991
$21,139
$32,062
8
18
26
475
201
122
10
Add 3% for transport to site for US and overseas applications (ocean freight
would increase freight cost)
Add Installation Man-hours
(3)
AERATORS
(A)
AERATOR SURFACE
$ / H.P.
5.0 10.0
10.0 25.0
25.0 50.0
50.0 100.0
$1,300
$809
$638
$605
AGITATOR:
11
AGITATORS
120
100
Man Hours
80
Top Entry
60
Side Entry
Bottom Entry
40
20
0
2.5
10
15
20
25
50
Horsepower
Propeller
Turbine
$ Cost of
Equipment
Installation
Man-hours
10
50
100
150
2,020
9,883
19,055
28,010
38
52
62
82
202
198
191
187
12
VOLUME
CUBIC FEET /
CUBIC YARD / M3
# OF MAJOR PIECES
5 / 0.20 / 0.15 (4 / 6)
10 / 0.40 / 0.30 (4 / 6)
25 / 1.00 / 0.76 (6 / 8)
50 / 2.00 / 1.52 (6 / 8)
75 / 2.75 / 2.10 (6 / 8)
100 / 3.70 / 2.80 (6 / 8)
250 / 8.00 / 6.10 (6 / 8)
270 / 10.00 / 7.60 (8 / 10)
(F)
H.P.
INSTALLATION
MAN-HOURS
ROTATING
MIXER
M.H. per HP
M.H. per M3
32
36
48
60
72
88
120
140
12.8
7.2
6.4
6.0
4.8
3.52
3.43
2.8
213
120
63
39
34
31
19.6
18.4
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
15.0
25.0
35.0
50.0
Material
INSTALLATION
MAN-HOURS
M.H. per HP
5
10
15
25
$7,545
$10,642
$13,241
$16,866
22
28
36
42
4.4
2.8
2.4
1.7
13
(G)
(H)
(5)
$ Material
INSTALLATION
MAN-HOURS
M.H. per HP
5
10
15
25
$9,135
$12,836
$15,681
$20,426
22
30
39
48
4.4
3.0
2.6
1.9
Material
INSTALLATION
MAN-HOURS
M.H. per HP
5
10
15
25
$10,887
$15,572
$19,121
$26,181
24
35
39
51
4.8
3.5
2.6
2.0
TYPE OF AIR
CONDITIONING
Accumulation / multi-zone
heating & cooling
Cooling unit(s) rooftop
mounted
Air cool steam or hot water
coil (packaged)
Rooftop mounted heating &
cooling multi-zone
Ditto with electric baseboard
heating
Ditto with hot water
baseboard heating
2 Pipe FCU
$1,985
B
C
D
E
F
G
14
$2,195
$3,329
$3,943
$4,673
$6,489
$3,500 - $4,500
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
4 Pipe FCU
Refrigeration compressor
heating & cooling
Ditto absorption /
combination unit
Chilled water (Refrigeration
Absorption)
Air Conditioning (Low High
range per ton)
Air Conditioning (HVAC)
cost per
Admin offices
Industrial Bldg / Factory
Hospital
Research Lab (non
classified)
$3,750 - $5,000
$5,602
$6,358
$7,550
$1,985 - $7,550
$ / SF
$12.70 - $22.50
$7.67 - $ 11.30
$11.87 - $22.30
$22.26 - $49.60
SF
M2
SF 22,723 M2
SF 22,723 M2
$ SF
$ M2
Cost
Cost
$25.15 $270.90
$26.83 $288.75
(U)
(V)
(W)
16
(X)
(Y)
S.F.
H.P.
Shipping
weight
$
Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
500
1,000
2,000
2,500
2.5
7.50
15
15/20
5.50 ton
9 ton
15 ton
18
40,754
54,540
79,301
87,409
154
182
210
254
$ Cost per
H.P. (excl
installation)
82
55
40
35
Miscellaneous Costs:
Self contained Thu wall units cooling only, 8,000 BTUs 120 volt
$310 plus 2.5 hours to install.
Thru wall units 0.5 2.5 Ton with electric heat $2,982 - $3,218 per
Ton
Roof top gas fired multi-zone 1 50 Ton $3,560 - $3,959 per Ton
FCU 2 pipe boiler / chiller 10 250 Ton $3,864 - $4,389 per Ton
FCU 4 pipe boiler / chiller 10 250 Ton $3,995 - $4,578 per Ton
FCU Floor or ceiling mounted units 1 ton $499
2.5 ton
$1,118
5 ton
$2,016
Multi-zone Rooftop H/C including dampers and controls10 100 ton
$1,580 - $1,801 per ton
17
(6)
AIR DRYERS:
(A)
(B)
AIR DRYERS:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting
holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments
on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours. The man-hour
installation units exclude initial chemical charging, cooling
liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze chemicals, M.E. passivation and
cleaning (pickling) and M.E. identification / stenciling &
subsequent tagging.
CAPACITY /
TONS
MAN HOURS
M.H. per
HP
1
2.5
5
10
25
22
34
42
64
125
22
13.6
8.4
6.4
5.0
$
Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
Cost per
CFM
5,000
15,000
45,000
60,000
195,239
584,624
1,573,026
1,963,416
428
1,580
1,700
2,150
37.20
37.10
33.30
31.20
18
(7)
CFM
Weight in
Pounds / KG
M.H. s
M.H. per
pound
75,000
100,000
10,500 4,775
14,500 6,590
138
164
0.013
0.011
(B)
(8)
(2)
(3)
Exhaust Fans
(4)
(5)
Dust Collectors
(6)
(7)
BALL MILLS
(A)
(9)
BALL MILL:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Installation man-hours exclude installation
of packings, internals, and brackets and any special testing /
inspection if required. Excludes cranes, setting holding
down bolts, foundations, grouting, brackets, supports, piping,
cable, conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity
adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
Tons / Hour
Equipment Cost
Installation
M.H. s
M.H. s per
Ton
10
25
50
100
$30,581
$74,174
$148,468
$273,797
42
94
174
314
4.20
3.76
3.48
3.14
BAGHOUSE
19
(A)
(10)
BAGHOUSE: C.S.
Installation man-hours include unloading, transportation
n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position,
setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Installation
man-hours exclude installation of trays, packings, internals
brackets and any special testing / inspection if required.
Excludes cranes, foundations, setting holding down bolts,
grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page
2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
Capacity /
CFM
Material
# of shipping
pieces
ManHours
$ Cost per
CFM
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
20,000
25,000
50,000
$33,890
$47,649
$62,976
$80,163
$94,366
$107,403
$130,778
8/12
8/12
8/12
8/12
8/12
8/12
8/12
20
32
42
56
120
140
156
$33.89
$19.06
$12.60
$8.02
$4.72
$4.30
$2.62
BLOWERS / FANS
(A)
(B)
BELT DRIVE
(M. H. s)
1.6
1.0
0.8
DIRECT DRIVE
(M. H. s)
1.75
1.40
0.85
Volume Cubic
Feet
1,000s / M3
Approximate
Weight
Pounds / KG
Number of
major
Pieces
Installation
Man hours
M.H. s
per
CFM
1,500 / 42
2,000 / 56
3,000 / 85
5,000 /141
10,000 / 283
15,000 / 424
25,000 / 707
50,000 / 1,414
75,000 / 2,120
100,000 / 2,827
150,000 / 4,240
250,000 / 7,068
100 - 45
150 - 68
200 - 90
250 - 115
400 - 180
600 - 275
900 - 410
1,500 - 680
2,100 - 955
3,000 - 1,365
4,000 - 1,820
6,000 - 2,730
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
5 / 10
5 / 10
5 / 10
5 / 10
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
24
36
48
72
96
2.66
3.00
2.66
2.00
1.20
0.93
0.64
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.38
(C)
Approximate
Weight LBS /
KG
Man hours
1,000
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
150,000
70 - 32
185 - 85
315 - 145
560 - 255
880 - 400
1,210 - 550
2,200 - 1,000
3,000 - 1,365
4
8
12
24
44
72
96
138
21
(D)
(11)
VOLUME
C.F. PER MINUTE
WEIGHT IN
POUNDS / KG
MAN-HOURS
M.H. per
HP
100 (5 HP)
14
2.8
28
3.7
46
3.7
62
3.1
74
2.4
120
2.8
170
2.7
220
2.5
BLENDERS
(A)
(12)
$113,400 - $155,610
$212,520 - $284,550
BOILERS:
(A)
BOILER:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Refer to item above for items included in
installation man-hours. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting
holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments
on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours. The man-hour
installation units exclude initial chemical charging, cooling
liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze chemicals, M.E. passivation and
22
BOILER:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Refer to item above for items included in
installation man-hours. Excludes cranes, foundations,
grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page
2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
Weight in Tons
1 10
10 20
20 40
(C)
(D)
5.22
3.84
2.46
Installation
Man hours
Man hours
Per
MBT s per
Hour / KW
10 / (5/10)
25 / 6 ditto
50 / 12 ditto
75 / 24 ditto
100 / 24 ditto
125 / 36 ditto
150 / 48 ditto
4.5
6
6
10
12
16
19
0.45
0.24
0.12
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.112
# OF
PIECES
WEIGHT
POUNDS
MANHOURS
M.H. per
Pound
150
250
500
1,200
2,000
5/8
Ditto
Ditto
Ditto
Ditto
1,350
1,700
2,750
6,350
10,570
18
24
32
48
72
.013
.014
.012
.008
.007
(E)
BOILER FLUE / VENT / CHIMNEY / CS (A 36 / A285):
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site transportation n/e
0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Typical heights of boiler chimneys range from 30 to 120, for heights
over 120 add 15% to man hour units indicated below, man hour units include installing
steel guying / wire and guying connections. Excludes cranes, refractory work / fire
brickwork, foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping,
cable, conduit and electrical hook-up:
* Includes gussets and stiffeners
Flue
Wall
Weight
Man-hours
M.H. per
Diameter
Thickness
Per 10 L.F.
Per 10 Foot
Pound
Inches
Inches
Pounds
Section
12
.20
380
3.00
.007
18
.25
580
4.50
.007
24
.25
630
5.00
.007
30
.25
830
5.50
36
.25
940
8.00
42
.25
1,140
9.50
48
.37
1,590
12.50
60*
.40
1,990
16.50
72*
.40
2,880
19.50
24
.006
.008
.008
.008
.008
.007
(F)
GUYED STACKS
TONS
1 10
10 20
20 40
40 60
(G)
12.4
9.3
8.1
6.3
Installation
Man-hours
M.H. s per
Pound
54
66
84
100
114
148
.012
.012
.012
.012
.011
.011
25
(H-1.2 & 3)
100
80
60
40
20
0
50
100
250
H or se po we r
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
50
100
H o r se p owe r
26
250
100
Man Hours
80
60
40
20
0
50
100
250
Horsepow er
(I)
S. F. / M2
Transfer
Area
Shipping $ Cost of
weigh in Equipment
tons
500 / 46.46
1,000 / 93
2,500 / 232
5,000 / 465
1.75
4
8.5
15
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per S.F.
18
37
45
54
34
33
20.31
16.00
16,842
32,687
50,768
80,010
Pounds
per hour
Shipping
weigh in
tons
$ Cost of
Equipment
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
pound.
5,000
10,000
8.5
18
58,601
110,145
164
314
11.72
11.01
27
100,000
500,000
57
145
370,262
1,470,672
788
1,150
3.70
2.94
(13)
Box Heater
(A)
(14)
BREAKERS (IMPACT)
(A). BREAKERS: Installation man-hours include unloading,
temporary warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80
km, unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting holding
down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up: Typically is shipped to site in 3 / 5 major pieces,
refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation
man-hours. The man-hour installation units exclude initial chemical
charging, cooling liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze chemicals, M.E.
passivation and cleaning (pickling) and M.E. identification /
stenciling & subsequent tagging.
(B)
H.P.
APPROX
WEIGHT/
LBS - KG
# OF
PIECES
M.H. s
M.H s
per HP
25
50
75
100
3,400 1,545
7,100 3,225
8,900 4,045
12,300 5,590
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
21
31
42
54
0.84
0.62
0.56
0.54
28
(15)
CENTRIFUGE:
(A)
CENTRIFUGE / EXTRACTORS
CENTRIFUGAL (CONSTANT) TYPE (c / w controls):
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Includes thermostat, holding brackets and
fuel pump: Excludes cranes, foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to
calibrate installation man-hours.
(B)
Volume G.P.M.
(Approx weight in pounds)
# of pieces
Installation
Man hours
M.H. s
per
Pound
5 (2,450) ditto
98
.04
10 (3,570) ditto
142
.04
25 (7,700) ditto
302
50 (8,650) ditto
342
75 (10,000) ditto
462
628
1,200
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
5,000 CFM
10,000 CFM
25,000 CFM
$ 331,065
$ 549,570
$ 1,003,485
420 M.H. s
710 M.H. s
1,334 M.H. s
100 GPM
3,000 GPM
$ 5,145
$ 63,683
18 M.H. s
32 M.H. s
29
If pumps and motor are skid mounted multiply above units by 0.85.
Cost range is $21 - $51 per GPM
(D)
CHILLER:
(A)
Ratings Ton
25
50
100
250
(B)
$ Equipment Cost
$17,650
$33,700
$39,850
$93,550
Installation Man-hours
30
38
46
108
$ COST / EQUIPT.
116,802
30
150
200
250
500
1,000
2,500
152,276
171,607
186,375
274,103
434,018
595,035
2.6
2.33
2.14
1.45
0.95
0.55
(19)
CLARIFIER:
31
Man-Hours
3-6
12
10
4 - 12
(A)
(20)
Diameter
H.P
Number
of Pieces
Pounds
$ Equipment
Cost
M.H. s to
install
12
18
24
30
2.5
2.5
5
5
4/6
4/6
4/6
4/6
250
550
1,050
1,450
23,058
30,896
36,398
44,935
11
17
27
35
COILS:
(A)
COILS:
Steam / Water
Remarks: man-hours include chiller condenser, compressor,
motor, heat exchanger and essential controls. Man-hours
exclude crane rental, foundations, setting holding down bolts,
grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical
hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to calibrate
installation man-hours.
Area SF
Weights
pounds
# of items
Man-Hours
M.H. per
pound
100
4/8
0.04
225
4/8
0.03
370
6/10
12
0.03
480
6 10
15
0.03
10
570
6/10
18
0.03
12
660
6/10
21
0.03
32
(21) COMMINUTORS
(A)
H.P.
G.P.M
Weight
(pounds - kg)
Man-hours
M.H. per HP
2.5
5
10
5,000
7,000
15,500
1,150 - 525
2,550 1,160
4,900 2,230
23
37
52
9.2
7.4
5.2
(22)
COMPRESSOR:
(A)
(B)
CENTRIFUGAL
0.33 / M.H.S PER H.P.
0.30 / M.H.S PER H.P.
RECIPROCATING
0.37 / M.H.S PER H.P.
0.35 / M.H.S PER H.P.
CFM
H.P.
Shipping
weight in
Tons
$ Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
CFM
100
250
500
1,000
20 / 25
25 / 40
75 / 100
150 / 200
1
2.25
3.50
5.25
26,350
45,029
87,649
123,921
32
38
66
88
263
180
175
124
33
(23)
COMPUTER ROOM:
(A)
(24)
EQUIPMENT
COST in $s
INSTALLATION
M.H. s
2.5
5
7.5
10
15
25
50
13,771
15,860
20,072
22,381
25,242
37,013
62,916
18.5
23.5
31
38
56
95
124
7.4
4.7
4.1
3.8
3.7
3.8
2.5
CONDENSORS / CENTRIFUGES:
(A) AIR COOLED CONDENSERS:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to
calibrate installation man-hours. The man-hour installation units
exclude initial chemical charging, cooling liquids, refrigerant /
anti freeze chemicals, M.E. passivation and cleaning (pickling)
and M.E. identification / stenciling & subsequent tagging.
Tonnage
# Of
Pieces
Weights
Pounds
Man-Hours
M.H. per
Pound
5
10
20
25
50
75
100
150
250
500
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
7/9
7/9
10/12
15
20
175
280
440
500
1,500
2,000
2,700
3,700
6,000
10,800
6
6
7
8
12
16
18
27
44
72
1.20
0.60
0.35
0.32
0.24
0.21
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.14
34
(B)
Tonnage
GPM
Number of
pieces
Man Hours
M.H. per
Ton
10
25
50
100
250
500
1,000
30
80
160
310
760
1,550
2,450
3/5
3/5
3/5
4/5
4/6
5/7
5/7
6.50
10
20
30
52
75
108
0.65
0.40
0.32
.0.30
0.21
0.15
0.11
(C)
RECIPROCATING AIR COOLED CONDENSING UNITS
(CONDENSER COMPRESSOR):
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position,
setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Excludes foundations,
setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page
2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
Tons
# Of
Pieces
Pounds
Weights
ManHours
M.H. s
per Ton
25
50
100
250
3/5
3/5
3/6
4/7
1,760
3,430
6,560
16,050
28
54
81
191
1.12
1.08
0.82
0.77
(D)
CONDENSERS (COALESCER):
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing,
site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into
position, setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Excludes
foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets,
supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to
productivity adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation manhours.
Tonnage
Number of
Items
Weights
Pounds
ManHours
M.H. s
per Ton
5
10
15
25
50
4/6
4/6
4/6
4/6
4/6
370
530
800
1,500
2,000
6
8
8
10
12
1.2
0.8
0.53
0.4
0.24
35
75
100
150
(E)
6/8
6/8
7/9
2,500
3,000
4,350
14
16
23
0.19
0.16
0.15
Tonnage
# of Pieces
100
250
500
1,000
3/5
3/5
4/6
4/6
Weight in
Pounds
3,500
4,500
9,500
17,500
Man-Hours
28
48
82
144
$ Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
Cost per
GPM
500
1,000
2,500
5,000
9,190
17,117
33,388
49,882
24
32
38
62
18.38
17.18
13.36
9.98
$ Equipment Cost
Installation Man-hours
5
10
25
50
100
$4,300
$5,750
$11,400
$17,750
$31,400
20
24
32
36
40
36
(25)
(26)
Weight /
Number of
Pieces
Man-Hours
M.H. per
Pound
1,000
2,500
5,000
11,000 - 5/8
27,000 - 6/8
55,500 - 7/10
388
594
706
0.39
0.24
0.14
CONVEYORS
(A). CONVEYOR: RECIPROCATING / CONTINUOUS ACTION:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, checking out of
conveyor and all components, lifting into final position, setting, leveling,
aligning, and system check out. Erection of supports, frames, complete
with idlers, conveyor frame, pulley, end supports, bolts, shims and
cables. Erection man hours include installation of conveyor motors, head
and bottom shaft, chain / belt, buckets and brackets such as head and
bottom section, typical bracing pieces, and filler pieces are included in
the following man hour units, including pulleys, springs, brake, bolts and
return belt etc. Add additional man-hours for lubrication system.
Excludes foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets,
temporary supports, piping, painting, electrical cable, conduit and
electrical hook up, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to
calibrate installation man-hours.
Diameter
inches
8
10
12
18
24
30
110
180
204
280
330
377
144
220
376
420
484
564
37
Total M. H. s
10
15
20
25
50
75
100
250
500
1,000
82
136
163
145
196
256
286
330
585
1,145
38
Travel Length
Feet
10
15
20
25
50
75
100
250
500
1,000
Total M. H. s
94
148
179
196
264
268
308
356
637
1,186
12
16
20
24
30
36
(E)
2.10
2.45
2.75
3.10
3.35
3.45
ROLLER CONVEYOR
10 WIDE
12 WIDE
14 WIDE
18 WIDE
(F)
1.25 M.H.S / LF
1.55 M.H.S / LF
1.75 M.H.S / LF
2.10 M.H.S / LF
SCREW CONVEYOR
6 DIA
8 DIA
10 DIA
12 DIA
4.10 M.H.S / LF
5.25 M.H.S / LF
6.50 M.H.S / LF
6.75 M.H.S / LF
Cost per LF $
Cost per M $
1,339
1,738
1,822
1,948
4,392
5,701
5,976
6,389
6 diameter
8 diameter
12 diameter
16 diameter
BUCKET ELEVATOR
6 X 4
10 X 6
12 X 9
16 X 9
(I)
3.30 M.H.S / LF
4.75 M.H.S / LF
5.25 M.H.S / LF
6.25 M.H.S / LF
Length Feet /
M
18
24
30
36
42
50 / 15.25 M
100 / 30.50 M
250 / 76.20 M
500 / 152.40 M
$13,187
$22,898
$50,945
$98,085
$14,650
$27,168
$61,494
$109,000
$16,970
$31,115
$68,367
$124,270
$18,846
$34,938
$75,752
$137,149
$21,464
$36,483
$82,229
$150,068
Width in
inches
Length
in feet
18
24
36
42
20
50
100
150
$ Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
31,542
35,464
54,364
71,048
55
102
202
312
40
(27)
COOLER (ACID):
(A)
GRAPHITE TUBE H.E. INCL PUMP:
Installation man-hours includes unloading, unpacking, transport from
temporary site warehouse to final location, assume n/e 0.50 miles 0.80
km distance, installation on base, adjusting drive, bearings, shaft
alignment, calibrating and system check out. Man-hours exclude lifting
equipment / cranes, foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting,
brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to
productivity adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
(28)
S.F. / M2
H.P.
Weight in
Pounds
Number
of
Pieces
ManHours
M.H. per
SF
10 / 0.93
25 / 2.32
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
0.50
1.50
2.50
5.0
15
225
790
1,070
1,370
2,750
4/6
4/6
4/6
7/9
7/9
21
51
77
98
235
2.10
2.04
1.54
0.98
0.94
COOLING TOWER:
(A) COOLING TOWER, PACKAGE & KNOCKED DOWN.
Carbon Steel:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position,
setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Excludes cranes,
foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports,
piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity
adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
WEIGHT IN TONS
PACKAGED M.H. s
PER TON
1 10
10 20
20 30
30 40
4.5
4
3
2.5
21
15.5
12
10
41
(29)
Tonnage
Weight
Pounds
Number of
Major Pieces
ManHours
M.H. per
Ton
10
25
50
100
250
500
1,000
2,500
850
1,100
1,750
3,330
8,500
11,770
23,600
37,700
4/5
4/5
4/5
6/8
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/10
14
16
23
28
86
108
172
298
1.40
0.64
0.40
0.28
0.34
0.21
0.17
0.12
CRUSHERS:
(A)
CRUSHER:
Installation man-hours includes unloading, unpacking, transport
from temporary site warehouse to final location, assume n/e 0.50
miles 0.80 km distance, installation on base, adjusting drive,
bearings, shaft alignment, calibrating and system check out. Manhours exclude lifting equipment / cranes, foundations, setting
holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up.
Number of
Pieces
Weight /
Pounds
M.H. s
100
150
250
500
1,000
7/12
7/12
7/12
7/12
10/12
5,000
6,000
7,000
12,500
17,500
26
36
48
88
124
(B)
$ Cost
M.H. s
10 H P
50 H.P
100 H.P
$47,455
$222,857
$401,100
58 M.H. s
245 M.H. s
420 M.H. s
Shipping
weight of
equipment
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
Cost
per
H.P.
2
10
25
50
0.25
0.75
2.00
5.00
2,756
9,671
17,467
32,487
6.50
14
26
46
1,313
921
665
619
CRYSTALIZER
(A)
$ 186,328
$ 252,362
$ 406,823
$ 609,473
164 Man-Hours
272 Man-Hours
378 Man-Hours
540 Man-Hours
(31)
DEARATOR:
(A)
Number of
Pieces
Weight
Pounds
ManHours
M.H.
per HP
25 / 18.64
50 / 37.29
100 / 74.57
250 / 186.43
4
4
5/6
7/8
350
450
1,000
1,500
12
16
24
51
0.48
0.32
0.24
0.20
43
500 / 372.85
1,000 / 746
2,500 / 1,864
(32)
7/8
10/12
10/12
2,500
5,000
9,600
85
124
195
0.17
0.12
0.08
DE MINERALIZERS
(A) DE MINERALIZER / ION EXCHANGE UNIT: Installation man-hours
include unloading, temporary warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50
miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling,
aligning, and system check out. Excludes foundations, setting holding
down bolts, grouting, cranes, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit
and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to
calibrate installation man-hours.
(33)
Flow Rate
GPM
Approximate
Weight
Pounds
Number of
pieces
ManHours
100
250
500
750
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
500
700
800
1,000
1,300
2,500
3,500
7,500
10/15
10/15
10/15
10/15
10/15
20+
20+
25+
8
12
16
20
24
42
48
72
DEMISTERS:
(A)
WEIGHT
IN
POUNDS
MANHOURS
M.H. per
Pound
1.0
30 (4/6 # items)
14
0.46
1.5
40 ditto
18
0.45
3.0
72 ditto
24
0.33
4.0
90 ditto
28
0.31
44
(34)
5.0
150 ditto
32
0.21
6.0
180 ditto
40
0.22
7.0
240 ditto
48
0.20
8.0
340 ditto
56
0.17
9.0
450 ditto
64
0.14
10.0
600 + ditto
72
0.12
DIGESTER (FIBERGLASS):
(A) DIGESTER Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, cranes, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit
and electrical hook-up:
(35)
Diameter (Feet.)
Weight Pounds
Man- Hours
5
10
20
25
140
250
440
770
4
6
16
28
DOWTHERM UNIT:
(A) DOWTHERM UNITS complete with local controls:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Includes installation of motor and drives,
controls: Excludes cranes, foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up: The man-hour installation units exclude initial
chemical charging, cooling liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze
chemicals, M.E. passivation and cleaning (pickling) and M.E.
identification / stenciling & subsequent tagging.
Duty million
BTU s
Per Hour
5
Material
C.S
Tubes
ManHours
$234,856
175
45
Material
S.S 304
Tubes
$354,209
ManHours
198
$440,289
10
$911,480
25
50
75
100
(36)
$624,415
246
$1,436,510
352
$1,528,003
$2,146,082
$2,744,859
274
$2,368,987
565
$3,105,328
646
$3,892,677
785
390
604
724
842
DRYERS
(A)
$
Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per S.F.
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.50
1,500 / 139.40
35,018
82,467
158,860
456,804
66
164
274
768
350
330
318
305
(A)
EJECTORS SINGLE STAGE (non condensing 150 PSIG)
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing,
site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into
position, setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Includes
installation of motor and drives, controls: Excludes cranes,
foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets,
supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up
Pounds of Air /
Hour
Material
Man-Hours
M.H. s per
pound of
air
50
100
250
500
1,000
$1,806
$2,462
$4,111
$6,001
$8,925
4
5
8
12
19
0.08
0.05
0.032
0.024
0.019
46
(B)
Installation Man-Hours
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
20,000
(39)
140
194
274
307
475
Approx, $ Cost
$35,018
$62,486
$80,798
$92,663
$111,741
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
(A)
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR C.S.: Installation man-hours
include unloading, temporary warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50
miles 0.80 km, unpacking, checking out of conveyor and all
components, lifting into final position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Erection of supports, guides, brackets, frames, bolts
and shims excludes setting holding down bolts, refer to productivity
adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
Volume / Cu Feet /
min
$ Material
Man-Hours
Man-Hours per
1K CFM
50,000
100,000
250,000
249,848
370,073
651,908
280
370
710
5.6
3.7
2.8
47
(40) (A)
ELECTRONIC LOAD CELL / SCALES: Installation
man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into
position, setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Includes
pit foundations, formwork, grouting. Excludes cranes, setting holding
down bolts, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical
hook-up:
Scale Loading
weight in Tons
Footprint of
Scale L x W in
Feet
Approximate
Total Weight
Pounds
Man hours
Including pit /
Civil work
M.H. per
Ton
5
10
25
50
100
10 x 8 / 96 SF
15 x 12 / 180 SF
40 x 12 / 480 SF
50 x 12 / 600 SF
70 x 12 / 840 SF
1,850
2,450
3,700
7,100
17,800
98 (civil=72)
122 (ditto 92)
208 (ditto122)
272 (ditto 162)
308 (ditto 192)
19.6
12.2
8.3
5.4
3.1
Pit is typically 5-6 deep with 4 thick concrete wall and 6 SOG with
4 diameter drain.
(41)
KW /
RATING
RPM /
FREQUENCY
APPROX
WEIGHT
M.H. s
COST
100
150
200
1800 / 60
1500 / 60
1500/ 60
3,500 #
4,400 #
8,000 #
80
88
128
$36,125
$54,206
$58,685
(B)
48
Generator Set
(42)
EVAPORATORS:
(A)
EVAPORATORS / CONDENSERS Long Tube Carbon Steel:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position,
setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Excludes foundations,
setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page
2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
(B)
Cooling / Heating
Area S.F. / M2
(EDR)
Number of
Major Pieces
ManHours
M.H. per
SF
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.50
1,000 / 92.90
2,500 / 232.35
5,000 / 464.70
10,000 / 929.40
3/5
3/5
3/5
5/7
5/7
5/7
5/7
120
200
310
555
807
1,110
1,450
1.21
0.80
0.62
0.55
0.32
0.22
0.14
S.F. / M2
$ EQUIPT
COST
INSTALLATION
M.H. s
$ Cost per
S.F.
10 / 0.93
25 / 2.37
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
68,775
148,444
276,586
500,535
53
127
197
382
6,550
5,655
5,268
4,767
49
(43)
FLAKERS:
(A)
DRUM TYPE:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position,
setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Excludes foundations,
setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page
2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
S.F. / M2
EQUIPT
COST
INSTALLATION
M.H. s
10 / 0.93
25 / 2.37
50 / 4.65
76,151
185,745
332,068
71
202
370
(44)
FILTERS:
(A) ROTARY / VACUUM / DISK:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to
calibrate installation man-hours. The man-hour installation units
exclude initial chemical charging, cooling liquids, refrigerant /
anti freeze chemicals, M.E. passivation and cleaning (pickling)
and M.E. identification / stenciling & subsequent tagging.
SF / M2
$ COST / SF
Man Hours / SF
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.50
1,000 / 92.95
1,517
887
509
357
226
2.25
1.33
0.85
0.635
0.37
50
(B)
(C)
$ COST / SF
Man Hours / SF
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.50
1,996
1,352
819
634
3.15
2.10
1.27
1.00
1,000 / 92.95
455
0.85
$ Cost per SF
10 / 0.93
25 / 2.37
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
5,832
5,493
3,527
2,102
(D)
$8,001 / SF
$ Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost per
S.F.
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.50
12,844
24,211
59,306
116,945
14
27
68
124
257
242
237
234
51
(45)
FORK LIFTS
(A)
(46)
$37,847
$57,488
$65,562
FUEL TANKS:
(A)
Material
1,000 gallon
2,500 gallon
5,000 gallon
$1,124
$1,381
$4,342
Labor Man-Hours
16
40
108
(47). GENERATORS
(A) PACKAGED / SKID MOUNTED GENERATORS
EMERGENCY / STANDBY UNITS Diesel Powered: Installation
man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into
position, setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out.
Engine 1,800 RPM and 60 Hz rating: Excludes foundations,
setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, cranes, supports,
piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity
adjustments on page 2 to calibrate installation man-hours. The
man-hour installation units exclude initial chemical charging,
cooling liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze chemicals, M.E.
passivation and cleaning (pickling) and M.E. identification /
stenciling & subsequent tagging.
K.W.
Rating
Approximate
Weight
Pounds
Number of
pieces
ManHours
25
50
75
1,450
2,050
2,460
5/7
5/7
5/7
28
40
56
52
100
125
150
175
200
250
500
2,750
3,350
4,100
6,200
7,500
8,600
10,500
5/7
5/7
5/7
7/10
7/10
7/10
7/10
72
84
100
122
134
146
220
% Value
34.5
5.2
Total
MW Size
500
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
25,000
Remarks
9.6
21.1
14.7
5.2
5.2
4.5
100.0%
Man-Hours
9,500
14,100
15,340
18,970
21,650
32,450
These man-hour units could increase by +/- 25% dependant upon site
conditions and the state of the economy.
53
OOM Cost
Construction Cost - (Total Facility
based on production capacity) $1,57
- $1,875 per MW Average Cost
$1,675 / MW
Construction Cost - (Total Facility
based on production capacity) $850
- $1,650 per MW Average Cost
$1,250 / MW
Construction Cost - (Total Facility
based on production capacity) $890
- $1,775 per MW Average Cost
$1,333 / MW
Construction Cost - (Total Facility
based on production capacity) $550
- $700 per MW Average Cost $675 /
MW
Construction Cost - (Total Facility
based on production capacity)
$1,400 - $1,975 per MW Average
Cost $1,690 / MW
Construction Cost $1,415 - $2,260
per MW Average Cost $1,840 / MW
Construction Cost - (Total Facility
based on production capacity) $500
- $670 per MW Average Cost $585 /
MW
0.15 0.25 cents per KW hour
10% - 15% of Capital Cost
Operating Costs:
Decommissioning Costs:
(49)
GIN POLES:
(A)
M.H.S
100 SINGLE
100 DOUBLE
200 SINGLE
200 DOUBLE
1,180
1,690
1,540
2,470
54
(50)
GLYCOL UNITS:
(A)
GLYCOL UNITS:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit and
electrical hook-up: The man-hour installation units exclude initial
chemical charging, cooling liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze
chemicals, M.E. passivation and cleaning (pickling) and M.E.
identification / stenciling & subsequent tagging.
GLYCOL UNITS
5
0
1-5
5- 10
10-20
To ns
Ton
1-5
5 - 10
10 - 20
20 50
4.40
3.60
2.25
1.88
(51) GRANULATOR
(A)
20-50
APPROX
WEIGHT
# OF PIECES
M.H. s
M.H. s per
HP
25
50
75
100
150
2,400
3,700
5,400
6,800
11,900
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
3/5
23
27
34
39
46
0.92
0.54
0.45
0.39
0.36
(B)
HAMMERMILL:
(A)
HAMMERMILLS:
Installation man-hours includes unloading, unpacking, transport
from temporary site warehouse to final location, assume n/e
0.50 miles 0.80 km, installation on base, adjusting drive,
bearings, shaft alignment, calibrating and system check out.
Man-hours exclude crane costs, foundations, setting holding
down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable, conduit
and electrical hook-up: Typically is shipped in 6 /12 main
pieces, refer to productivity adjustments on page 2 to calibrate
installation man-hours. The man-hour installation units exclude
initial chemical charging, cooling liquids, refrigerant / anti freeze
chemicals, M.E. passivation and cleaning (pickling) and M.E.
identification / stenciling & subsequent tagging.
Tons per
hour
Motor
Horse
Power
Weight
Pounds
ManHours
M.H. per
Ton
10
15
20
25
50
75
100
150
200
250
10
20
25
30
50
100
100/125
150
200
275
2,500
3,000
4,200
5,000
7,500
10,000
14,000
17,500
22,500
30,000
24
28
36
42
64
78
104
122
144
164
2.4
1.87
1.80
1.68
1.30
1.04
1.04
0.80
0.72
0.66
56
500
750
1,000
(B)
400
500
500/650
40,000
50,000
75,000+
188
208
238
0.37
0.27
0.24
HEATERS:
(A)
C.S. Tubes
M.H. s
Alloy Tubes
M.H. s
10
20
30
40
50
1,840
2,870
3,925
4,705
5,580
2,740
3,770
5,740
6,675
7,370
(B)
CONVECTORS - Surface - Wall Mounted Unit:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position,
setting, leveling, aligning, and system check out. Excludes foundations,
setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up, refer to productivity adjustments on page
2 to calibrate installation man-hours.
(C)
S.F / M2
EDR
Number of
Pieces
Pounds
Weights
M.H.s
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.46
4-6
4-6
12
12/15
75
125
420
780
5
5
22
38
57
Boiler
H.P
100
250
500
1,000
2,500
(D)
(E)
Weights
Pounds
# of pieces
1,500 (5/6)
2,500 (7/8)
3,000 (7/8)
4,500 (8/9)
8,500+ (10+)
ManHours
M.H. per HP
34
64
78
98
182
0.34
0.26
0.16
0.10
0.07
Equipment Cost
Installation M.H. s
10
25
50
100
$1,218
$2,872
$5,497
$10,616
2.5
4.5
8
14.5
(F)
(G)
Duty /
Million
BTU s
MATERIAL COST
(refer to previous
tables for installation
work)
5
10
25
50
100
$229,681
$380,221
$722,898
$1,177,288
$1,928,908
5
10
25
50
100
$350,729
$582,385
$1,100,108
$1,807,238
$2,977,613
Weight
50
100
150
250
185
250
345
510
Hours
2.5
4
6
10
$ Cost
1,071
1,365
1,580
2,221
2.5 hours
4
8
59
$2,111
$4,510
$7,697
$1,265
$2,683
$4,720
Price per KW
(K)
$113 - $149
50
100
$1,292,550
$2,315,250
2,200
3,700
HEAT EXCHANGERS
(A)
MATERIAL COST $
50
100
150
200
(B)
3,539
5,670
5,938
6,767
M.H.S
6
8
10.5
12.5
S.F.
$ / SF
Range
60
Installation
man-hours
per S.F
6
8
12
25
50
100
25
50
100
50
100
150
53 58
41 45
37 - 42
65 70
48 51
34 39
61 65
42 47
37 41
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
0.10 - .0.25
$320 / SF
$257 / SF
$243 / SF
$236 / SF
$266 / SF
$244 / SF
$231 / SF
$213 / SF
$108 / SF
$64 / SF
$54 / SF
M.H.s
250 SF
500 SF
1,000 SF
1,500 SF
2.5
4
6.5
8
$45 / SF
$35 / SF
$29 / SF
$27 / SF
61
(A)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
150
225
300
500
750
1,000
1,500
K VA
(56)
HOISTS:
(A)
Hoist, 5 speeds, C. S.
Tons
2.5
5
12.50
25
$ Cost
$9,980
$17,724
$37,947
$69,600
Man-Hours
8.5
11
18
32
(57)
HOPPERS
62
2,000
(A)
$22,712 - $32,167
$42,504 - $65,935
$73,206 - $97,871
HORIZONTAL DRUMS:
(A)
Installation M.H.
Approx, Cost
1,000 / 454
2,500 / 1,136
5,000 / 2,272
10,000 / 4,545
20,000 / 9,090
97
126
144
240
340
$18,865
$34,774
$47,853
$54,165
$66,756
TONS
50 100
(61)
14 18.5
INSTALLATION OF TRAYS:
(A) INSTALLATION OF TRAYS IN TOWERS / TOWER
INTERNALS:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Installation man-hours exclude, internal
packing, grog / chemicals / catalyst and any special testing /
inspection if required. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting
holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up: 2 sections: Sieve / Perforated tray
excludes packings, brackets and clips:
(62)
Diameter
24
36
48
60
$4,574
$5,713
$6,269
$6,805
$4,710
$6,269
$6,878
$7,269
LIFT STATIONS
(A)
(63)
$74,708
$138,653
$195,510
MANLIFT
(A)
Number of Stops
Material
Man-Hours
2
3
4
$12,936
$14,637
$15,855
122
132
148
64
(64)
$17,000
164
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS:
(A)
(B)
Miscellaneous Items:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out.
Description
M.H.s
12.0
4.5
16.5
2.5
1.5
H.P/ Equipment
Cost:
Top
Diameter / #
of items
Bottom
Diameter
M.H. s
0.5 / $2,840
24 / 3 - 5
65
1.0 / $3,447
2.5 / $6,818
5.0 / $7,732
7.5 / $12,505
10.0 / $15,204
(F)
30 / 3 - 5
60 / 3 - 5
84 / 3 - 5
120 / 3 - 5
144 / 3 - 5
6
9
12
18 / 20
22 / 24
11
19
33
44
54
1,000 GPD
2,500 GPD
5,000 GPD
$21,368 / $21.37
$28,492 / $11.39
$43,607 / $8.72
$ 17,603 - $22,376
$ 26,402 - $35,753
Material Cost
66
Man-Hours
BTU s / Hour
0.25
0.50
1.00
2.50
5.00
(J)
$38,135
$59,035
$90,138
$157,445
$377,604
28
42
82
142
186
Compressor Centrifugal:
H.P.
$ Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
250
500
1,000
$141,979
$207,854
$268,721
518
379
245
36
56
76
H.P.
50
100
250
500
1,000
2.5
5
7.5
20/25
50 / 75
$ Equipment
cost
$2,600
$2,895
$3,251
$4,680
$6,234
Installation
man-hours
14
20
28
36
52
$ Cost
per
GPM
$49.52
$27.57
$12.38
$8.91
$5.94
5
10
15
20
25
121
158
203
229
300
4
4
6
8
8
CFM / HP
$ Cost
Man-Hours
$1,817
$3,707
14
32
67
$41,869
76
$74,582
$145,824
$336,158
88 M.H.s
154 M.H.s
410 M.H.s
Man Hours
250
500
1,000
104
260
750
$273
$536
$728
$ Cost
Man-Hours
$7,497
$25,331
$34,671
17
54
72
Drum Area SF / M2
CS Cost per
68
250 / 23.23
500 / 46.50
1,000 / 92.90
2,500 / 232.30
SF
SF
$5.81
$2.72
$1.03
$0.15
$6.66
$3.05
$1.17
$0.25
(S)
(T)
(65)
MOTOR CONTROL
(A)
$1,475
$1,685
$2,242
$2,526
6 M.H. s
8 M.H. s
11 M.H. s
16 M.H. s
MOTORS
(A)
$ 740
$ 8,888
$ 104,055
6.5 M.H. s
32 M.H. s
118 M.H. s
PNEUMATIC CONVEYING
(A)
69
(B)
(68)
Length / LF
-M
2 per LF
4 per Lf
6 per LF
8 per LF
50 / 15.25
100 / 30.50
250 / 76.20
500 / 152.45
29.84
69.93
95.84
121.37
64.69
99.00
136.75
179.91
74.55
124.19
172.11
224.21
85.47
148.09
204.90
247.11
(69)
Area / SF
M2
# Of pieces
M.H. s
M.H. per SF
100 / 9.30
200 / 18.60
300 / 27.90
400 / 37.20
500 / 46.50
4/7
4/7
4/7
5/8
5/8
42
48
54
64
82
0.42
0.24
0.18
0.16
0.16
PUMPS
(A) Gear Pump, C S A 285C
GPM
H.P.
$
Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
GPM
50
100
300
500
2.5
5
15
20
4,207
4,487
8,059
12,195
8
11
16
32
84
45
27
24
H.P.
$
Equipment
Cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
GPM
50
2.5
4,846
14
97
70
100
250
500
5
15
25
7,782
14,226
21,624
20
30
52
78
57
43
$ Cost
$5,219
Man-Hours
4
$7,135
2,111
$5,114
$6,447
6.5
REACTORS:
(A) REACTOR CARBON STEEL: (Glass Lined) with full jacket Cost
per gallon $140.18 / $37 per Liter
(B)
GALLONS
MATERIAL
COST 304 S.S
M.H.S
MATERIAL
COST $316 S.S.
M.H.S
2,500
5,000
10,000
51,842
78,036
113,490
46
104
145
59,701
82,568
122,653
49
116
153
71
(71)
REFRACTORY LINING
(A)
Cost per LF
18
24
36
48
(72)
Cost per M
224
347
571
751
735
1,138
1,873
2,463
SILO / HOPPER:
(A)
CONICAL ROOF:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting
holding down bolts, grouting, brackets, supports, piping,
cable, conduit and electrical hook-up:
Equipment and labor cost $4.57 - $6.20 per cubic foot.
(73)
STACKS
(A)
Height
20 high, 24 diameter
(2.00 ton
40 high, 48 diameter
(3.50 ton
96 high, 72 diameter
(15.00 ton)
$ Cost
Man-Hours
$4,809
12
$21,404
33
$68,591
96
Weights
Pounds / kg
Man
Hours
M.H. per
Gallon
1,000
2,600 - 1,180
28
0.028
72
2,500
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
100,000
(B).
3,100 - 1,410
7,100 - 3,225
12,500 - 5680
22,500 -10,225
51,500 -23,410
83,500 - 37,955
35
41
53
69
82
106
0.014
0.008
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.001
MATERIAL COST $
1,000
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
5,481
9,093
13,776
16,034
19,745
M.H.S
8
14
19
26
32
DIAMETER in
feet / M
WEIGHT /
LBS
$ MATERIAL
COST
INSTALLATION
M.H. s
15 / 4.57
20 / 610
25 / 7.62
30 / 9.15
35 / 10.67
40 / 12.20
45 / 13.72
50 / 15.24
19,500
29,800
48,800
69,600
88,600
119,500
151,400
189,600
$51,053
$75,376
$103,281
$125,729
$166,646
$220,263
$248,348
$303,902
98
139
183
214
283
387
445
502
(D).
CAPACITY in
gallons
CARBON
STEEL Cost
M.H. s
S. S. 304
Cost
M.H. s
5,000
7,500
10,000
20,000
25,000
$23,730
$29,610
$36,120
$60,585
$78,855
26
37
42
56
67
$34,230
$42,315
$52,710
$87,885
$91,560
29
43
49
65
73
(E)
(F)
(G).
MATERIAL COST
INSTALLATION
M.H. s
25,000
60,000
100,000
200,000
325,000
$50,804
$77,404
$88,498
$121,812
$164,954
78
118
133
183
218
STORAGE TANKS (FLOATING ROOF) Installation manhours include unloading, temporary warehousing, site
transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km, unpacking, lifting
into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and system check
out. Excludes cranes, foundations, setting holding down
bolts, grouting, cranes, brackets, supports, piping, cable,
conduit and electrical hook-up.
CAPACITY /
GALLONS
MATERIAL COST
INSTALLATION M.H. s
15,000
30,000
50,000
100,000
150,000
250,000
$9,622
$14,187
$19,178
$30,479
$40,742
$61,671
14
21
28
43
78
94
74
(H).
GALLONS
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
13.55 18.59
9.71 14.28
5.72 8.93
3.41 4.73
Gallons
Material Cost
Cost / Gallon
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
100,000
250,000
$30,311
$37,268
$51,741
$65,172
$82,734
$135,116
$6.06
$3.73
$2.07
$1.30
$0.83
$0.54
(I).
Material Cost
Cost / Gallon
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
100,000
250,000
$45,157
$61,872
$85,592
$103,262
$135,113
$187,465
$9.03
$6.19
$3.42
$2.07
$1.35
$0.75
(J).
Gallons
Material Cost
Cost / Gallon
5,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
100,000
$54,522
$70,839
$98,179
$125,639
$160,346
N/A
$10.90
$7.08
$3.93
$2.51
$1.60
N/A
250,000
50,000 CF
material cost)
100,000 CF
material cost)
150,000 CF
material cost)
75
Weight
(tons)
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
gallon
10,000
30,000
75,000
100,000
3.10
6.50
11.75
16.00
17,953
27,803
58,049
67,976
19
28
64
118
1.80
0.93
0.77
0.68
Weight
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
gallon
1,000
10,000
30,000
50,000
0.50 ton
1.50 ton
2.10 ton
3.85 ton
$9,540
$33,620
$61,293
$96,179
12
24
32
62
9.54
3.36
2.04
1.92
(P)
Weight
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
gallon
5,000
10,000
25,000
35,000
3.50 ton
4.80 ton
5.70 ton
8.45 ton
$28,809
$44,364
$71,483
$97,320
30
36
44
58
5.76
4.44
2.86
2.78
76
(Q)
(75)
TOWERS
(A)
$ Cost
Man-Hours
50 CF
150 CF
500 CF
50 CF Porcelain Saddles
$ 628
$ 2,006
$ 7,660
$ 3,197
15
45
122
12
$ Cost
Man-Hours
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
988
1,138
1,286
1,460
1,612
1,706
2,273
2,489
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.0
$ Cost
Man-Hours
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
1,255
1,423
1,643
2,157
2,504
2,867
3,371
3,953
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.0
77
$ Cost
Man-Hours
32 x 5 diameter (8.5
Ton) 10 trays
52 x 7.50 diameter (22
Ton) 20 trays
72 x 10 diameter (50
Ton) 30 trays
60,323
42
135,293
162
261,188
337
TRANSFORMERS:
(A)
TRANSFORMER (DISTRIBUTION):
3 Phase, Dry Type 480 v primary and 208 / 120 v 60 hz
secondary Installation man-hours include unloading,
temporary warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles
0.80 km, unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling,
aligning, and system check out. Excludes cranes,
foundations, setting holding down bolts, grouting, brackets,
supports, piping, cable, conduit and electrical hook-up:
Transformer
Capacity KVA
Installation
M.H. s
Approx Cost
20
50
100
12
32
40
$1,131
$3,059
$4,817
(B)
(C)
Man-Hours
32
42
56
DRY TRANSFORMERS
KVA
250
500
1,000
(D)
Man-Hours
28
38
52
78
KVA
100
150
300
500
$ Cost
Man-Hours
11,172
14,396
24,329
36,278
32
42
56
Material $ Cost
Man-Hours
2.5
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
20,186
26,182
34,461
42,053
46,064
54,348
18
24
30
36
40
48
Motor
H.P. / # of items
ManHours
M.H. per
HP
2,500
5,000
10,000
15,000
25,000
50,000
2.5 (5-7)
2.5 / 5 (5-7)
5 / 7.5
7.50 / 10 (5-7)
15 (10-15)
25 (10-15)
38
57
102
127
208
337
15.2
15.2
15.1
14.5
13.9
13.5
79
(79)
Area / SF
M2
# Of pieces
M.H. s
M.H. per SF
25 / 2.32
50 / 4.65
75 / 6.97
100 / 9.29
200 / 18.60
4/7
4/7
4/7
4/7
7/10
12
22
32
42
54
0.48
0.44
0.42
0.42
0.22
(B)
$113,925 - $188,265
$199,710 - $277,935
(A)
(81)
Capacity in
gallons
304 SS
316 SS
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
$20.19
$14.70
$13.13
$10.59
$30.61
$18.11
$17.06
$13.97
VERTICAL TOWERS:
(A)
VERTICAL TOWERS PRESSURE VESSELS -- not
exceeding 120 T/T:
Installation man-hours include unloading, temporary
warehousing, site transportation n/e 0.50 miles 0.80 km,
unpacking, lifting into position, setting, leveling, aligning, and
system check out. Installation man-hours exclude
installation of trays, internal packing, internals brackets, and
any special testing / inspection if required. Excludes cranes,
80
1 10
10 20
20 40
40 60
60 80
80 100
12.5
10
8.4
4.35
3.25
2.85
(B)
C.S.
.
Horizontal Vessel / Drum, SS 316
Gallons
Weight
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
gallon
1,000
3,500
7,500
9,000
0.75 ton
1.50 ton
3.20 ton
4.80 ton
26,861
61,577
130,694
145,786
27
37
56
68
26.86
17.59
17.43
16.20
Weight
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
gallon
500
1,000
2,500
4,000
0.70 ton
1.60 ton
3.00 ton
4.80
5,881
9,057
15,246
23,547
8
12
27
38
11.76
9.06
6.10
5.89
81
Weight
$
Equipment
cost
Installation
man-hours
$ Cost
per
gallon
1,000
5,000
10,000
15,000
1.60 ton
3.75 ton
5.75 ton
8.25 ton
16,736
31,956
37,122
49,398
23
26
29
42
16.74
6.39
3.71
3.29
82
Man Hours
250
200
150
100
50
0
100
250
500
750
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
15,000
Volume in Gallons
(83)
VIBRATING SCREENS
(A)
Size
Of Screen L X
W inches
Motor
/H.P
Weigh /
Poundst
# Of
pieces
M.H. s
M.H. per
HP
60 x 72
60 x 84
60 x 108
60 x 120
96 x 72
96 x 84
96 x 108
96 x 120
5
7.5
10
10 / 15
7.5 / 10
10 / 12.5
15 / 20
15 / 20
4,150
5,270
7,350
8,150
5,150
5,960
7,850
8,950
7 /10
7 /10
7 /10
7 /10
7 /10
7 /10
7 /10
7 /10
18.5
25
37
45
25
31
47
54
3.7
3.33
3.7
3.6
2.85
2.75
2.68
3.10
83
(84)
(85)
Volume
Material
Labor
M.H. s
5,000 gallon
10,000 gallon
25,000 gallon
$4,986
$7,337
$20,810
16
48
64
AREA / SF M2
# Of pieces
M.H. s
M.H. per SF
20 / 1.85
25 / 2.32
50 / 4.65
100 / 9.30
5/9
5/9
5/9
10+
78
88
132
188
4.10
3.70
2.77
1.97
Add 3% for transport to site for US and overseas applications (ocean freight
would increase freight cost)
(87)
Vessels 316 L
10,000 gallon
15,000 gallon
20,000 gallon
$37,013
$54,107
$68,901
$3.70 gallon
$3.61 gallon
$3.45 gallon
25 M3
50 M3
75 M3
$133,770
$239,820
$301,980
$5,350 M3
$4,796 M3
$4,026 M3
25 M3
50 M3
75 M3
$557 M3
$525 M3
$488 M3
25 M3
50 M3
75 M3
$583 M3
$546 M3
$509 M3
85
SECTION D 1
FRONT END & SEMI - DETAILED ESTIMATING METHODS
The section will in many ways will assist in condensing the cost estimators estimating
efforts and the will optimize the time needed to compile a front end estimate. The end
result should result in more consistent and accurate front end estimates. Semi-Detailed
estimating is a powerful estimating tool, it is basically a hybrid of two estimating methods
(1) Conceptual Estimating and (2) Detailed Estimating, an estimator / engineer familiar
with this method can save a great amount of time utilizing this method, it can be used to
generate new estimates with an accuracy of +/- 15% it can also be used to check
conceptual and detailed estimates. The activity of Conceptual / Front End cost
estimating is a first-rate tool for forecasting the cost of a CAPEX project (s), as we all
know many times the scope and timing of capital projects will typically be subject to
numerous changes during the projects life cycle (how much would it cost if we produced
10, 000 gallons per day, what if we produced 14,000 gallons a day, what would the plant
cost if we built it in Mexico, would we save time and money if we used modules in the
construct effort, should we stick build it, lots of questions, coming at the estimator, of
course all these factors will impact the cost of the plant), this resource / tool can be
used to explain or support the decisions made and is many times the genesis of the
project (s) scope and the how the scope was developed and how the final estimated cost
was arrived at, (how it was compiled and possibly modified along the early stages of the
projects life cycle), an estimator or engineer who is skilled in producing front end & semidetailed estimates is a valuable resource to his or her employer.
The (CAPEX) capital cost for the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC)
project(s) comprises of all the activities and expenditures associated with a specific
building, plant or facility: the major activities will comprise of:
Other items could include contractors fees, bonding; insurance (BAR and workers
compensation) and local state taxes, (VAT on overseas applications), tariffs and import
duties, currency fluctuations specific to the CAPEX project. It is the contention of the
authors of this database that a complete Front End & Semi-Detailed Estimate(s) can be
compiled for a Manufacturing / Process and Commercial type facility from the data
contained within this section together with data from earlier sections of this annual cost
database. Depending on extent / degree of design definition (i.e., engineering
deliverables) the estimator / cost engineer / project manager can either use the ratio
method described earlier in section B 2 or if better / enhanced definition on the study /
proposed project is available can choose to compile a Front End / Semi Detailed
Estimating approach described in this section. When you come right down to it a capital
cost estimate is an evaluation / opinion of the final capital cost of a Engineering,
Procurement and Construction (EPC) project, the end uses of an capital cost estimate
are focused on the expected / probable final cost of the completed EPC CAPEX
project(s), used correctly it is the initial control budget, in addition it is a planning and
scheduling tool that can be utilized to determine the manpower requirements / peak
manpower needs to complete the current known scope this can be used to determine
field labor needs and Home Office engineering needs, it can be used as a means for
arriving at a cash flow / spend out plan, a discussion document to resolve risk or scope
items, a bidding / budget tool, or one of the final deliverables of a proposal effort and or
the initial project control framework of an EPC project. The know-how of estimating is not
magic or a mystery nor is it an exact science, it requires the input of an individual(s) that
is organized and analytical in his or her work effort. The endeavor of estimating
(looking into the future, is what this activity is all about) has been around for a long time,
hundreds if not thousands of years, the reasons / need for cost estimating have stayed
much the same over the years, how much material do we need order, how many men
should we hire, how long should we keep this labor resource, how much will it will the
piping cost, when will it be completed, questions and more questions are needed to be
known before moving forward upon any significant EPC project(s). A front end / semidetailed cost estimate can be any kind of capital cost estimate blue sky, order of
magnitude, feasibility, conceptual, appropriation (A.F.E.), preliminary, definitive or lump
sum capital cost estimate, (dependent upon the level of effort applied to the front end
engineering / estimating effort, the resulting accuracy is in many ways contingent upon
the quality / exactness / accuracy of the scope of work statement and other project
related data / information and time and resources available to complete the front end
engineering package and estimating effort, refer to Classification of Cost Estimates and
Range of Accuracy on the following pages. Whatever the case may be, the following
scope / data / deliverables (engineering and estimating) information is many times
required to complete a front end / semi detailed estimate (accuracy +/- 20%):
Assumptions and exclusions, contingencies, source of the cost data and the resulting
accuracy need to be fully document in finalizing the capital cost estimate, the following
engineering deliverables are usually required to complete the type of capital cost
estimate.
1.
2.
A Major Equipment list together with an outline specification, capacity / sizes and
materials of construction.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
A listing Offsite related work, roads, utilities and main piping locations (if this
scope is not defined apply a value of between 20% and 60% to the I.S.B.L. value
to cover the cost of the offsite related work).
8.
9.
10.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Approved Final engineering (P&I Ds) approved / instrument list is generated and
out for final pricing
Instrumentation list is approved
Sub-station MCC designed and sized and placed on order
Preliminary single line diagram and specifications / motor list area classification
determined
Preliminary lighting needs and specifications / motor list
Approved Final single lines / motor list / area classification
Final specs power / lighting needs, area classification map
Quantity take-offs completed for cable, conduit and cable tray together with all
miscellaneous electrical materials completed and priced out by vendors
Preliminary insulation requirements
Detailed equipment list / piping with insulation requirements
Approved engineering (P&I Ds) Detailed insulation specs
Various unit prices / bids from Sub Contractors
Spare Parts, Vendor Assistance, Refractory, Painting, Heat Tracing Freight Costs
Percentage factor of direct costs
Detailed estimate of construction equipment and small tools
Detailed estimate of field support man hours
Detailed estimate of bulk materials, taxes and insurance
Percentage factor of construction costs for initial estimates and benchmarking
final values
Preliminary / Final estimate of man hour requirements (HO and Field)
Detailed estimate of EPC H.O. travel, drawings and other H.O. related costs. C M
details. O.S.B.L. Data
Procurement plan / Contracting strategy
Construction Field Establishment & Support - Cranes, trailers, support labor,
batch plant, testing, field offices and staff
Field procurement / warehousing
COA / Escalation / Fee / Detailed Design and field professional man hours
determined / Bonds / Insurance / Start up costs / other costs
Contingency determination (use REP / MC simulation for D & E estimates
Detailed Management Estimate Review / Estimate Basis (exclusions / inclusions)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Accuracy
+/- 25% - 35%
+/- 25% - 20%
+/- 10% - 5%
Type of Estimate
OOM / Ball Park / Blue Sky
Conceptual / Pre - Design / Feasibility
Front End / (FEED) / Preliminary
Budget Control
Lump Sum / GMP / Turnkey
Contingency %
30 - 40
20 30
15 20
7.5 15
2.5 7.5
Accuracy % +/40 50
20 30
15 20
5 10
0-5
The best solution perhaps is to use an average of both methods indicated above to
arrive at a value that meets the readers needs.
The following data / man hours, material and installation units have been collected over
a period of 15 + years the charts / tables following are not in alphabetical order, it is the
intent of the publisher to update / add to this data source in the next and subsequent
updates.
The following front end and semi-detailed capital cost estimating method detailed in this
section includes a reasonably uncomplicated procedures that will permit estimators, cost
engineers and project / site managers to rapidly and precisely:
Evaluate EPC firms / contractors / subcontractors / vendors proposals.
Compile O.O.M. / front end / conceptual / semi detailed estimates with negligible / limited
project specific data.
Pre-Project / early funding studies:
Audit cost estimates compiled by other organizations.
Verify / Audit / Challenge the cost of proposed scope modifications / change orders.
Assistance in auditing any possible claims (the official audit trail):
Planning / Scheduling the Engineering, Procurement and Construction effort, i.e.,
manpower requirements and long lead delivery items.
Cash Flow forecasting:
Assist in providing basic capital cost data specific to future Value Engineering studies.
Assist in benchmarking actual performance Vs planned.
This method / approach can be put into action at the early engineering / design phase
(the overall detailed engineering effort may be less than 5% complete, sometimes even
before detailed design has been started) i.e., partially complete P & I Ds, i.e., the P & I
Ds may only be between 20% and 50% complete and the general arrangement / plot
plan related drawings, i.e., these drawings could be substantially less than 100%
complete, the merit / worth of the resultant cost estimate(s) may well be as superior as a
traditional detailed cost estimate typically prepared at the 10% - 20% detailed
engineering milestone by corporate engineering group, EPC contractors / engineering
firms and contractors, more often than not with more engineering resources required to
produce the level of engineering required to produce the resultant engineering
deliverables (drawings, specification and bills of quantities) and the resulting significant
financial expenditure to get to this level of engineering. Sometimes these front end /
semi detailed estimates are more cost effective than and as accurate as the detailed
capital cost estimate that is produced at the 20% - 25% engineering milestone. This front
end estimating method / approach does not rely totally on priced / quoted major
equipment values (described in Section B 2 earlier) this method can be helpful if certain
key quantities can be established, i.e., cubic yards of concrete, tons of structural steel,
lengths of piping etc. can be established and added to the Major Equipment (M.E.) cost.
The data indicated on the following pages under the heading of Historical
Benchmarking data. These data point include (1) Cubic yards of concrete per M.E. item,
5
(2) Tons of structural steel per M.E. item, (3) L.F. of pipe per item of M.E. plus a number
of other useful metrics that will assist in compiling a Front End / Semi-Detailed Capital
Cost Estimate. The following comments apply to the data contained within this section.
1.
The estimating all in unit costs which are detailed are on a U.S. basis, these units
can be modified / calibrated by use of international location factors to determine the cost
of plant / or facility located in an overseas location.
2.
This front end capital cost estimating method / approach presents sufficient
general data / information to allow the scope of work statement, cost control, value
engineering data and EPC (eng / procurement and field activities) to be monitored
throughout the detailed execution phase of the project, perhaps until a detailed control
estimate is compiled, usually when the detailed engineering effort is 20% to 40%
complete, hopefully the civil drawings will be completed, allowing the civil field work to
commence.
3.
The method / approach contains basic milestone / benchmarking points for the
application of risk management, value engineering considerations, resolution / focusing
factors, range estimating, escalation determination and contingency considerations, to
make the capital cost estimate more complete and reflective of the scope to be
completed.
The compilation i.e., the nuts and bolts (front end engineering and estimating effort) of
producing a front end / semi-detailed capital cost estimate for a intermediate sized i.e.,
$5 - $10 million refinery / chemical / process / manufacturing related grass roots and revamp plant with approximately 10 - 40 items of major equipment, i.e., pumps, heat
exchangers, vessels etc., (not the off sites; this is usually estimated with a percentage
value 20 60% of the I.S.B.L. work, this is usually adequate at this stage of the projects
life cycle, if the I.S.B.L. scope is known use the following data to budget / estimate the
cost of compiling a front end / semi detailed estimate) this effort would more often than
not take an estimator / project manager no more than 40 60 hours (this is only the
estimating, cost data collection effort ) this together with the front end engineering /
study effort (perhaps no more than 60 to 160 hours of additional effort by a Chemical
Engineer / Project Engineer P.E. / Purchasing Agent, making calls to vendors for budget
pricing, etc.). The Front End / Semi detailed engineering / estimate study should contain
the following deliverables, items 1 5 would be produced by the Chemical Engineer /
P.E. / Purchasing Agent (would have a minor role), with the Estimator / Project Manager
compiling items 6 and 7, this effort say 200 hours x $70 / hour would cost $14,000
1.
Production of conceptual / preliminary / front end scope of work statement /
package / execution approach.
2.
Preliminary major equipment list (with vendor budget quotes on the main
equipment items, hopefully based on prelim, spec sheets).
3.
4.
5.
Conceptual plot layout sketches / general arrangements / major equipment
locations / footprints and numbers of floors for any required buildings / facilities.
6.
A Front End / Semi Detailed Estimate, with a narrative / basis of estimate and a
contingency allowance of between 10% and 15%.
7.
Milestone schedule indicating the start and finish dates of the major Engineering,
Procurement and Construction activities.
Historical Benchmarks
The following table indicates typical ranges of support facilities / services / utilities,
expressed as percentages of the bottom line (TIC) cost of a Chemical facility. In addition
to this table there are a number of additional tables that highlight various historical
benchmarks.
Category
Admin building / guard house
Buildings / change rooms / control
rooms / administration offices (not
main admin office)
Cooling water supply and distribution
Expensed items (demo / dismantle /
repairs / sunken costs)
Fencing
Firewater water supply and
distribution
Gas supply and distribution
Loading area (scales / loading
docks)
Railroads
Roads / walkways
Steam production / boiler and
distribution
Water treatment
Water supply and distribution
Waste treatment
Warehouse finished products
Warehouse raw products
Tank farm
Yard lighting
Percentage Range
1.50% - 8.50%
0.50% - 4.50%
0.50% - 1.50%
0.25% - 1.75%
0.10% - 0.25%
0.50% - 0.75%
0.50% - 1.25%
0.15% - 0.50%
0.50% - 1.00%
0.50% - 2.50%
1.50% - 5.00%
0.25% - 1.50%
0.25% - 0.75%
0.50% - 1.50%
0.50% - 5.00%
0.50% - 2.50%
0.50% - 7.50%%
0.15% - 0.30%
For applications were the M.E. count are less than 25 use $110,800 per M.E. item.
Cubic Yards of Concrete per piece of Major Equipment (I.S.B.L.):
7
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use 25 CY per M.E. item.
Tons of Structural Steel per piece of Major Equipment (I.S.B.L.):
Number of M.E.
items
25
50
100
200
300
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use 3.0 tons per M.E. item.
LF of pipe per piece of Major Equipment (I.S.B.L.):
Number of M.E. items
25
50
100
200
300
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use 650 LF per M.E. item.
Heat Exchanger (S & T) C.S.:
Area
100
500
1,000
Cost per SF
$69 - $102
$46 - $79
$28 - $54
Cost per SF
$350 - $625
$145 - $254
$117 - $151
100
500
1,000
5,000
10,000
$46 - $74
$18 - $34
$9.24 - $13.13
$2.84 - $6.93
$2.10 - $3.47
Number of M. H.s
40,990 / 1,639
79,600 / 1,592
143,700 / 1,437
296.800 / 1,484
471,200 / 1,570
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use 1,750 M.H. s per M.E. item.
Number of piping lines per piece of M.E. (I.S.B.L.):
Number of M.E. items
25
50
100
200
300
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use 10 lines per M.E. item.
Number of instrumentation loops per piece of M.E. (I.S.B.L.)
Number of M.E. items
25
50
100
200
300
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use 5 loops per M.E. item
Bulk Material (L-M) per item of M.E. (I.S.B.L.):
Number of M.E. items
25
50
100
200
300
For applications were the M.E. count is less than 25 use $156,700 per M.E. item.
Home Office - Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC): Typical Hourly Rates:
- Charged to Owners by EPC firms working on major US domestic and overseas
Refinery / Chemical / Manufacturing CAPEX Projects - ranging in value from $25 million
- $500+ million. (Note these are 2009 bill-out rates for US based staff, CAD machine
costs are not included in rates, Xerox copies, express mail, long distance telephone calls
are not included in rates and would be additional to the rates indicated below (this value
could range between $4.50 - $7.50). Rates include salaries of staff, fringe benefits, and
rent or leasing costs of office accommodation, electricity, heating / air conditioning,
maintaining office (cleaning); support staff such a HR department / security services, the
rates include a profit margin of 7.5% - 10%. (Note these rates correspond to a multiplier
of 1.8 - 2.6 of W2 salaries). The day rates are based on 8 hours per day, many projects
work 5 -10 hour days and 4-10 hour days the following week, for an average of 45 hours
per week, adjust day rates if this is the situation.
Skill
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Minimum
Man-hour
Hourly /
Rate in US
$
$150
$140
$140
$140
$135
$120
$110
$100
$130
$105
$115
$105
$60
10
Minimu
m Day
Rate in
US $
$1,200
$1,120
$1,120
$1,120
$1,080
$960
$880
$800
$1,040
$840
$920
$840
$480
Maximum
Man-hour
Hourly /
Rate in US
$
$200
$180
$175
$175
$155
$145
$135
$120
$150
$140
$135
$125
$85
Maximum
Day Rate
in US $
$1,600
$1,440
$1,400
$1,400
$1,240
$1,160
$1,080
$960
$1,200
$1,120
$1,080
$1,000
$680
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Lead Planner
Planner
Junior Planner
Lead Cost Engineer
Cost Engineer / Cost Analyst
Senior Quantity Surveyor
Junior Quantity Surveyor
Lead QA / QC Engineer
QA / QC Engineer
Lead Procurement / Contracts
Manager
Deputy Procurement / Contracts
Manager
Contracts Engineer - S/C Coordinator
Procurement Team Member
Expeditor / Trafficking Coordinator
Warehouse Materials Coordinator
Vendor Inspector (Equipment)
Contracts Administrator
Lead Designer
Designer / CAD Operator
Document Control Team Member
Secretary / Administrator
Home Office Construction Manager
Project Accountant
Accounts Payable Clerk
H O Safety & Health Manager
Commissioning / Start Up Engineer
$115
$105
$60
$115
$100
$115
$50
$110
$95
$110
$920
$840
$480
$920
$800
$920
$400
$880
$760
$130
$125
$85
$130
$120
$130
$85
$130
$120
$135
$880
$100
$100
$85
$80
$55
$75
$65
$85
$60
$55
$40
$105
$85
$50
$85
$105
$1,080
$125
$800
$800
$680
$640
$440
$600
$520
$680
$480
$440
$320
$840
$680
$400
$680
$840
$125
$110
$90
$90
$110
$95
$115
$95
$85
$65
$135
$110
$85
$120
$125
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
11
$1,040
$1,000
$680
$1,040
$960
$1,040
$680
$1,040
$960
$1,000
$1,000
$880
$720
$720
$880
$760
$920
$760
$680
$520
$1,080
$880
$680
$960
$1,000
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
The following is the engineering / design man (detailed design) hours per piece of major
equipment (pumps, vessels, heat exchangers, towers, etc.) data is from a number of
new / green field and revamp / upgrade chemical / refinery projects completed in North
America in the 1990s.
Total EPC Home Office per piece of Major Equipment
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
New or
Revamp
New plant
New plant
New plant
Revamp
Revamp
Revamp
Revamp
Facility Size
Small
Mid-sized
Large
Small
Mid sized
Large
Mid sized
Hours / M.E.
items
5,560 / 12
17,750 / 23
40,204 / 97
7,970 / 7
33,395 / 31
73,899 / 83
31,370 / 34
As can be seen from the above data, the engineering man hours per piece of major
equipment falls in the range of 400 1,200 man hours, these man hours include:
Project Management / Project Engineering
Engineering / Drafting / CAD
Procurement activities / Contracts / QA/QC
Project Control
H.O. Construction Support / H.O. Accounting / Administration
Above man hours include the total home office involvement as listed, excludes site
management team. Note the above data points exclude O.S.B.L. (off sites work).
Typical Production hours to produce various Drawings specific to a $10 - $50 +
million process related facility:
Discipline
Civil
Man-hour Range
60 120
80 120
80 120
60 120
60 80
40 60
Architectural
Structural
Mechanical
Major Equipment
Process
Process Pipe
Electrical
I/C
OSBL Data
80 120
40 80
60 100
80 120
40 80
40 80
50 100
60 120
60 90
40 60
40 60
40 80
60 140
25 50
30 60
50 100
50 100
60 120
80 160
50 100
60 120
60 120
10 18
30 60
40 80
40 100
40 80
30 60
50 100
20 40
30 60
40 80
Demolition
1.5 3.5 hours per ton for demo of equipment and piping
0.0025 0.005 hours per CF content of demolished facility
Miscellaneous Items: when sketches and preliminary drawings / engineering
deliverables are on hand, formulate approximate quantity take-offs and use prices
indicated in B 4 earlier in unit price section and / or the all in pricing data indicated
below. Quantify and estimate as many work items that can be quantified from the
engineering deliverables available and the time / resources available.
Various all inclusive price lists (Labor & Material) Unit Prices used for quick OOM budgets or for
checking pricing from a contractor. (Includes contractors O/H and profit) (To convert SF to M2
multiply by 10.76 to convert LF to M multiply by 3.28)
Item
Unit Of Measure
13
$ Cost
SF
LF
2.75
231
LF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Ea
Ea
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
CFM
CFM
CFM
Ea
Ea
Ea
Per floor
CF
TON
CY
100-139
2.10
1.68 2.81
5.25
13.07
14 19
11 17
546 945
446 756
16 34
0.84
5.30
29.61
39.17
20.69
5.46
2.94
5.20
5.36
2.89 7.14
2.89 4.99
22 39
3,145
5,350
3,812 6,353
38,850 54,075
0.30 0.53
45.15 70.88
27.20 53.55
ACRE
CY
CY
CY
CY
CY
SY
LF
Ea
SF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
SF
SF
SF
LF
CY
LF
2,987
7.09
9.29
18.64
20.63
23.94
28.25
23.47 41.48
2678
29.56
21.95
29.19
34.81
43.79
20.84
25.57
4.25
4.73
5.09
0.95
79.43
152.25
LF
LF
LF
LF
SF
SF
CF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF of lab are
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
54.08
66.68
79.12
16.22
1.44
2.26
42.58
12.44
47
54
64
82
2.47 3.57
2.99 4.25
4.15 5.67
4.73 6.41
6.88 9.08
15.75 21.89
1.89 3.57
84 103
2.42 3.57
3.15 4.73
4.10 6.20
11.55 14.54
7.19 9.56
10.19 14.70
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Each
15.49 20.16
31.40 37.17
20.11 23.99
25.04 29.93
12.50
13.49
3,885
Structural Steel (Misc., iron work), generate quantity take-offs and convert to pounds /
tons (weights can be obtained from various construction reference books / tables) from
available drawings / sketches and costs from Section B 4, or use the following all in
pricing listed below. Compile estimate by buildings / facilities, process structures,
miscellaneous platforms and pipe supports / racks. Structural Steel material costs and
erection man hours typify the average of the hours and material unit prices utilized by
various large structural steel fabricators / installers, fabricated and delivered to the job
site, including associated aligning and leveling, bolts / brackets / gusset plates, welding
and one primer coat of paint (excludes grouting).
Material
$2,619
$2,446
$5,972
$6,334
$11.77/SF
15
12/14
12/14
48/56
44/60
0.20/0.25 SF
Grating, galv
Stairs, galv
Pipe rack steel
Metal Decking 20 g 1.50 deep
Open Mesh / Checker plate
Staircase
Handrail CS Single
Ditto Double
$5,999
$6,329
$2,597
$2.86/SF
$19.39 / SF
$201.42 /LF
$33.97 / LF
$45.90 / LF
40/48
36/42
16/18
0.10/SF
0.12/SF
Warehouse 8 14 pounds
M.H. s / LF
(Vertical)
.185
.235
.335
.41
.715
.935
1.90
M.H. s / LF
(Horizontal)
.105
.155
.22
.275
.475
.64
1.45
M.H. s / LF
(Overhead)
.21
.31
.45
.51
.87
1.15
3.33
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Warehouse
Control room 3 operators
MCC room
3-5 admin offices
Field laboratory (2 people)
Lunch room (12 users)
Change / wash room
Reception / waiting area
SF / $ cost
Typical size in SF
53 79
95 152
89 - 163
84 - 126
95 - 126
95 - 173
63 116
89 121
5,000 / 10,000
500 / 700
250 / 400
750 / 1,000
200 / 350
300 / 500
400 / 600
250 / 350
16
9.
Garage / Parking Stall R.C. open Structure cost per car
$11,000 low $16,500 high
10.
Hospital cost per bed / patient
$57,225 low - $173,250 high
11.
Hotel / Motel cost per room Average
$28,665 low - $59,850 high
12.
12 Hotel / Motel cost per room (3 star)
$46,725 low - $115,500 high
Tons
100
200
300
400
500
Low Pressure Scotch Boiler, fired by natural gas (Material & Labor)
Pounds of steam / hour
5,000
7,500
10,000
17
O.O.M. / Conceptual Estimating for budgeting Air Handling Blower type equipment
(1)
Air Handlers
(2)
(3)
Exhaust Fans
(4)
(5)
Dust Collectors
Process plants
Refineries
Chemical facilities
Biotech manufacturing plants
Pharmaceutical process facilities
Manufacturing facilities
Metal pipes are usually made from ductile iron, black or galvanized steel (CS), copper,
or stainless steel (i.e. 304 / 316) and numerous alloy type materials that all have cost
and installation consequences. Basically there are three manufacturing methods for
producing metal piping systems. (1) Seamless pipe is manufactured by drawing a solid
ingot / casting slab over or through a piercing rod / dye to produce the circular / hollow
shell, i.e. pipe while the ingot is at an extremely high temperature, this production
method is perhaps the most widely used in the industry, it is often more readily available
than welded pipe, which is the second most widely used material. (2) Welded pipe is
18
formed by rolling steel plate in circular form and welding the joint / seam together, the
slag is ground off the pipe both externally and internally. (3) Cast pipe is not widely used
and is only used in special circumstances; this is of course more expensive than the
above 2 # manufacturing steps / methods. The materials that are used include carbon
steel such as (A-53, A-106, A-83, A-120 which are the most widely used in industry - to
name but a few), alloy steels (sometimes referred to as exotic materials) such as
(Stainless Steel S 304, 316, 304L, 316L, 317 254SMO, AL6XN, 309, 310, 347 - to name
but a few) together with and an extensive variety of nonferrous materials. Both the
ASTM and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) have over many
years supplied a very useful service / role and guidance in compiling and updating
comprehensive bulletins and specifications for this complex / maze-like range of
applications specific to piping related materials and their appropriate applications. In the
last decade or two the use of plastic piping (applications and materials) Polypropylene
(PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) piping systems, Hi-Temp CPVC (PVDC) pipe and
fittings have made a giant leap forward in the process industries, plastic pipe can be put
in place with less hours than steel pipe, it weighs less and can be cut relatively quickly.
The following points / topics should be considered when initiating the estimating and
take-off effort specific to process piping / utility piping inside or outside a manufacturing
facility or in the application of a chemical plant - Inside Battery Limit (ISBL) and Outside
Battery Limit (OSBL). Process Piping. Process piping work essentially is made up of the
following items and components. The vast majority of all piping systems have the
following components associated with them that need to be evaluated and estimated.
Material unit prices (remember sizable discounts can be achieved from suppliers
for large quantity orders possible as much as 40%- 50%).
Waste 2.5% 5% (typically).
Freight, 2% to 3% for US applications should be added to the purchase price if
this is missing from a suppliers quote.
Man-hours for (field fabrication or shop pre-fabrication and field erection).
Labor costs (union Vs non-union).
Construction equipment (welding machines or cranes).
Consumables (gases and welding rods).
Small tools.
Indirect labor (support to direct field labor).
Supervision.
Overhead and profit.
All of these topics / elements to need to be considered and allowed for in the estimate,
additional scope issues to be considered include, new or revamp work, productivity,
weather, onsite or offsite fabrication, union / non-union work or merit shop and any
unique constraints such as completion date or working in an existing facility, working on
grade or working 100 above grade. Initiating the process (ISBL or OSBL) piping
estimate, must start with a review of the available engineering data (design deliverables)
if it exists, line lists, sketches, plot plans, major equipment locations, piping and
instrument diagrams (P. & I.D. s), photographs - a site visit would be helpful, and an
appreciation of the total scope of work (written or verbal), project goals, restraints,
materials of construction and specifications, scope items to take account of in the
process piping take off / estimate include the following:
Piping system: The entire piping system used for the movement of fluids /
chemicals / water / powders / air etc used in the process / manufacturing effort.
19
This work includes cutting, beveling, fit up, preheating, welding, stress relieving,
grinding and any required x-ray testing or NDT, together with any hydro testing
and or pickling of the piping system. This should also include piping related bolts,
nuts, gaskets, weldolets, caps, unions, strainers and nipples etc.
Pipe Fittings: All required piping fitting (elbows, caps, reducers, tees)
Pipe Flanges / Couplings (150# / 300#): All required pipe flanges, couplings
utilized to join pipe to pipe and any required fittings (elbows, reducers, tees) to
each other.
Pipe Valves: All necessary valves (gate, globe, check, butterfly etc) utilized in
starting, stopping and regulating the flow of fluids throughout the process /
manufacturing steps.
Pipe hangars, shoes, guides and any required supports and frames.
Evaluation and points to consider before starting the Scope Review / Take Off /
Estimating effort: The estimate / take off effort should recognize its physical location i.e.
Inside Battery Limits (ISBL) and OSBL (Outside Battery Limits Off-sites) piping
material and labor should were possible be separated out by its material of construction,
codes, (API, ASTM, ASME, and ANSI etc.) specification, diameter, schedule wall
thickness i.e. schedule 40, 80, small bore piping (2diameter and less, usually joined
together with screwed fittings) and large bore piping (2diameter and greater, typically
welded together). Take off the quantity of pipe in LF or Meters; count the number of
fittings and their rating (150# or 300# tees, elbows, reducers etc, welded or screwed)
and number of valves. Fabrication of process pipe includes the collection of material
from lay down yard, preparation, measuring, cutting, beveling, welding, stress relieving
and any grinding to manufacture various piping isometrics / spools for eventual field
assembly and installation. Additional factors to take account of include the following.
Material handing issues, the need for forklifts, trucks, lay down area, bar coding
and other warehousing and transportation / logistics issues.
Control valve installation and the demarcation of pipe fitter & electrician work
(consider control wiring and hook-up issues).
Make sure underground piping is wrapped or coated and is accounted for in the
estimate, include and thrust blocks.
Ensure that all required orifices, strainers, blinds; rupture discs, pressure relief
valves and any flexible hoses are accounted for.
Worker protection issues such as weather, noise, fumes and eye protection.
Sizes of project issues, i.e. smaller projects have larger mobilization and
demobilization activities, these projects typically experience a greater learning
curve.
20
Shift work / overtime issues such as additional supervision, worker fatigue and
shift pay differentials.
Ensure that pipe sleepers (usually pre-cast concrete) are accounted for.
Tie ins and shut down issues such as hot taps, hot work permits and equipment
standby.
Small bore diameter pipe (2diameter and less, usually joined together with
screwed fittings). This type of piping is usually fabricated at the site sometimes
referred to as field run piping.
Large bore diameter pipe (2diameter and greater, typically welded together) is
typically fabricated in a pipe fabrication vendors facility and shipped in spool
pieces to the jobsite, the benefits of this is (1) quality control (produced in a
factory type environment), (2) schedule enhancement, (3) optimized costs and
the need for less welding activities at the job site, i.e. less field manpower
requirements.
The estimate / take off should recognize any vents, drains and waste piping
systems (that are usually field run), couplings, expansion joints, thermo welds,
weldolets, jumpers and strainers etc that are need and to what level of
magnitude.
Establish scope / and quantity of steam tracing required and estimate accordingly
(spiral or straight run tubing).
Ensure that existing systems are drained and safe prior to new tie-ins to piping
systems.
The estimate / take off should recognize any breaking up of paved areas,
excavation, planking & strutting, stone bedding materials, thrust blocks,
backfilling and any off site disposal, road crossings and the reinstatement of road
or paved areas.
The piping related to a Biotech / Pharmaceutical Process Facility is typically a big piece
of the overall pie, the cost of this work typically runs between 25% - 50% of the total
installed cost of the completed facility, so care and attention needs to be taken in
scoping out and estimating this element of the project. This topic can be somewhat
complex due to the fact that there are so many systems to consider, the only way to
estimate this scope is to break it down into smaller pieces. Some of the systems that will
be encountered are listed below:
21
Process piping
HVAC piping
Service piping for Manufacturing / Process Equipment
Vacuum systems
Compressed air systems
Reverse Osmosis piping (RO)
Water systems
Water for injection piping (WFI)
De-ionized water piping (DI)
Laboratory gases
Cryogenic storage systems
Sanitary treatment
Drainage system
Clean in place systems (CIP)
Steam in place systems (SIP)
Gases (CO2, nitrogen, argon, natural gas and perhaps more) needed to be
quantified.
These and many other systems to numerous to mention need to be scoped out and
estimated. Biotech / Pharmaceutical process facility type piping must be fabricated and
installed to high quality standards, the quality of these piping systems is vital for the
future production / safety / quality and future profitability of any biotech / pharmaceutical
company. Issues that need to be considered in estimating this type of work includes:
materials to be used: There are numerous materials that could be selected that have
cost consequences associated with them, some of the most commonly used materials
are aluminum, brass, carbon steel, stainless steel, cast iron, copper, some of these are
corrosion resistant materials, CPVC, polypropylene pipe, double wall materials
jacketed piping, additional items to bear in mind are various cleanouts / clover leaf
fittings, gas piping, glass pipe applications, PVC applications, fiberglass reinforced pipe
(FRP), various pipe liners, fittings, valves, shock absorbers, hangars and various
wrappings. There are two distinct types of piping in Biotech facilities, (1) piping that
comes into direct contact with the finished product, many times referred to as clean
piping more often than not SS 304 and 316, and (2) piping that does not come into
direct contact with the finished product, many times referred to as non clean piping,
these piping systems can be copper, carbon steel, plastic and a host of other less
expensive materials. Pharmaceutical piping systems and manufacturing / production
equipment usually make use of stainless steels applications, stainless steel 304, 304 L,
316, and 316L are the most frequently used materials, these materials are less likely to
corrode over time than carbon steel applications, the manufacturing steps in the
pharmaceutical industry is usually subject high operating temperatures and pressures,
the industry has to ensure that cleanliness is always maintained in the manufacturing
process, hence the use of these materials.
Manufacturing / production equipment can typically be made of a combination of both
S.S. 304 - 316 and SS 304 L - 316 L and other materials such as 317 and 321(plus on
some occasions 2205, 254SMO, AL6XN, 309, 347, 405, 7MO, monel, titanium, inconel
and admiralty), The most conventional type of stainless steel is a type of steel called
austenitic, this is a type of alloy(s) that has a high amount of chromium within its
makeup. These austenitic steel products have a somewhat high resistance to surface
deterioration (pitting and corrosion) when in its passive condition, when oxygen makes
22
contact with the surface of plates or pipe it forms a protecting build-up or layer of
chromium oxide material. 304 stainless steel is used in sheet metal products, food
production, manufacturing facilities (bakeries, dairies etc), hospitals and various storage
tanks and road transportation tanks together with piping, fitting and associated valves
and applications that are not sensitive to a marine or corrosive location. 304 is readily
shaped and welded; however it does not have good milling characteristics. 316 stainless
steel is used in more extreme corrosive locations / applications, it is widely used in
refineries, chemical plants, on the other hand, 316 stainless steel is subject to pitting /
corrosion if it encounters high levels of chlorine for extended periods of time. 316
Stainless Steel is utilized in corrosive environment or in marine environment. 304 costs
6% - 10% less than 316 stainless steel, stainless steel type 304L and 316L stainless
steels are utilized when components need to be welded, the L indicates a low carbon
level, this grade basically allows extra corrosion resistance after the weld has been
made, it is not crucial to use 304L and 316L for sheet metal applications. Typically the
cost differential between 304 and 304 L and 316 and 316 L is not that great, over the
last five years 304 L and 316 L applications have been averaging 3% to 6% more
expensive than 304 and 316 stainless steel. Extruded seamless and / longitudinally
welded SS piping / tubing is frequently used in stainless steel piping systems 0.50 to 2
diameter. Specifications that are many times followed are ASTM 269 and 270. The
above mentioned piping systems are many times used in manufacturing of Biotech /
Pharmaceutical products such as vaccines, sterile products, oral solid dosage products,
potent compounds, pharmaceutical intermediates, hormone growth products,
fermentation related products, tablets, R & D medicine facilities and Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), these piping systems are required to be cleaned /
flushed and sterilized many times over there production life. The most common piping
material and size utilized in Biotech / Pharmaceutical Process Facility is stainless steel
as previously described; the piping typically is 1 to 4 diameter (typically 2 diameter is
the most common diameter).
The piping systems typically encountered on these types of facilities are DI (de-ionized
water piping), WFI (water for injection piping), CIP (clean in place piping), SIP (steam in
place piping), RO (reverse osmosis piping) and other service / utility type piping. Electropolishing (EP) and mechanical polishing (MP) and passivation methods are applied to
stainless steel piping and process / manufacturing equipment to curtail future corrosion
activities, the cost impact of this progressive polishing activity is considerable and can
increase the cost of these stainless steel materials / systems by as much as 10 - 20%,
other materials such as monel, titanium and inconel do not require this polishing /
passivation activity. The vast majority of Biotech / Pharmaceutical Process Facility
Piping utilizes the orbital welding applications, orbital welding machines (were the
welding activity takes place in a vacuum chamber / the welding arc moves around the
pipe wall) Vs manual welds, the use of orbital welding has increased dramatically to
perhaps were perhaps 75% of all shop / field welding applications uses the orbital
welding method. Orbital welding has become the favored technique for installing (the
actual welding together of the pipe to each other) in SS piping systems. Plastic piping is
also used in this type of construction, plastic piping / thermoplastics are used in some
piping systems; PVC, Clear PVC, CPVC, PVDC, ABS, PVDF, PB and PP are widely
used; these materials are readily obtainable and will lessen the construction (installation)
costs and construction schedule. Polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC, this
is good for a service temperature up to 140 degrees F, it is not recommended for
compressed air or gases) piping systems could be specified if the temperature, pressure
and fluid is non corrosive, this piping material are cost effective (materials and field
installation less man-hours to install), however these materials do not perform well in
23
hot / high pressure applications, CPVC performs reasonably well in hot / high pressure
situation, (it can handle temperatures up 200 degrees F, it is not recommended for
compressed air or gases). Additional plastic piping / thermoplastics such as
polyvinylindene fluoride (PVDF) or Hi-Temp CPVC (PVDC) pipe and fittings can be used
in higher temperature / pressure applications also, the cost benefit of using plastic (PVC)
type piping / thermoplastics materials in various piping systems is usually 20% 70%
lower than the cost of a similar 304 / 316 SS system / application, it must be
remembered that these stainless steel piping systems / applications typically need non
destructive testing (NDT), x ray inspection, electro-polishing (EP) and mechanical
polishing (MP) polishing / passivation and bore scoping that of course impacts the cost
of these piping systems.
Piping Material Take-Offs: use the Process Flow Diagrams (P F D s) / Piping and
Instrumentation Diagrams (P & IDs), site lay outs, plot plans, general arrangement,
equipment locations, elevation drawings, building sections and follow the existing pipe
racks if possible to develop quantity take-offs as follows: Locate and become aware of
all process / utility lines in specific process areas and ascertain their diameter, schedule
(wall thickness), material of construction and operating specification, line number (if
available) and flange rating, i.e., 150# or 300#. Quantify length lineal feet or meters
(i.e., perform quantity take off use a rotometer if possible, use a red pencil to check off
lengths as you go through this exercise) starting from the closest point to the main
header pipe rack, to end of line or piece of major equipment (be aware of changes in
vertical and horizontal direction, i.e., drops, underground sections, road crossings, risers
etc.), be attentive to the fact that drawing scales do change from one drawing to the
next. Ensure that all piping lines in the interconnecting pipe racks including main
headers, off site / utility supplies from remote storage / utility / and other process trains
and operating units such as, WFI, chilled water / heating / cooling lines / process water /
steam high & low pressure / condensate returns / city / potable water / manifolds / plant
air / hydrogen / nitrogen / instrument air / tie-ins / drain points etc., are taken off or
accounted for (use the allowances described later to ensure the take off is complete i.e.
small bore piping), count up all valves both - manual and motor controlled valves
indicated on P F D s / P & I Ds, count fittings (elbows, tees, reducers and any other
fittings) if time permits. Be aware that not all piping is shown on the P & I Ds. / Piping
drawings, piping below 1 diameter many times is not indicated; time and again this
small bore piping is field run and is not shown on any of the piping drawings. Compile
piping insulation and heat tracing (piping or electrical) quantities when performing the
above take-off activity. Use the following allowances to capture all the piping required
that is not highlighted / shown on the completed piping drawings. These allowances
should be added to the piping main quantities (or estimated cost value sheet / summary
page) mentioned above the allowances are for the following:
Allowances
Small bore piping 1 and below (usually field run) add 3 5% to the main piping
take off quantities / or cost
In-line devices (not the actual device) add $275 (L&M) for each $10,000 (L&M) of
piping value
Floor drain 4 diameter: includes 150 of u / g pipe allow $5,775 (L&M) includes
excavation and backfill.
Utility stations (U.S.)(water / steam / compressed air) allow 1 # U.S. per 7,500 SF
of process facility area allow $3,950 (L&M) for each U.S.
24
Drains / ejectors / sumps / traps together with any minor (50 100) underground
piping allow $4,725 each
Hot taps / tie ins allow $1,315 for 2 and below, $2,310 for 4 diameter 6 12
diameter use $3,465 - $4,620 for each tie-in
Safety showers 1 # per 10,000 SF of process facility area allow $5,985 (L&M)
Eye wash safety unit 1 # per 5,000 SF allow $3,100 (L&M)
Heat tracing piping / tubing allow $16 - $35 LF
Strainers / flexible couplings / jumpers add $420 (L&M) for each $10,000 (L&M)
of piping value
Wrapping to u / g 4 diameter pipe $1.45 / LF 6 diameter $1.90 / LF
Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel Piping budget pricing per LF and M: The following
table outlines 2009 budget pricing for 2 diameter thru 6 diameter piping systems, (the
accuracy of these values can be considered +/- 15%):
(A) Carbon Steel process pipe: inside / outside an operating unit, reasonably
complex with numerous changes in direction requiring small sections of pipe /
spools with fittings and subsequent welding, A 53 schedule 40, 1,000 LF installed
with 50 Number 150# flanges and 10 number fittings (elbows and tees, valves
are not included) includes 5% X-ray, hydro testing, hangars and field erection.
Installation hours are for pre-fabrication offsite and field erection. Includes 2
foam insulation with aluminum jacket. Field erection rate is $53 / hour (which is a
non-union application).
(B) Carbon Steel process pipe: inside / outside an operating unit, reasonably
complex with numerous changes in direction requiring small sections of pipe /
spools with fittings and subsequent welding, A 53 schedule 40, 1,000 LF installed
with 100 Number 150# flanges and 20 number fittings (valves not included)
includes 5% X-ray, hydro testing, hangars and field erection. Installation hours
are for pre-fabrication offsite and field erection. Includes 2 foam insulation with
aluminum jacket. Field erection rate is $53 / hour.
(C) Stainless Steel process pipe: inside / outside an operating unit, reasonably
complex with numerous changes in direction requiring small sections of pipe /
spools with fittings and subsequent welding, Stainless Steel 304, 1,000 LF
installed with 50 Number 150# flanges and 10 number fittings (valves not
included) includes 5% X-ray, hydro testing, hangars and field erection.
Installation hours are for pre-fabrication offsite and field erection. Includes 2
foam insulation with aluminum jacket. Field erection rate is $53 / hour.
(D) Stainless Steel process pipe: inside / outside an operating unit, reasonably
complex with numerous changes in direction requiring small sections of pipe /
spools with fittings and subsequent welding, Stainless Steel 316, 1,000 LF
installed with 50 Number 150# flanges and 10 number fittings (valves not
included) includes 5% X-ray, hydro testing, hangars and field erection.
Installation hours are for pre-fabrication offsite and field erection. Includes 2
foam insulation with aluminum jacket. Field erection rate is $53 / hour.
Pipe 2009 Pipe 2009
Insulation
Insulation Pipe 2009 Cost Pipe 2009
cost per LF Cost per LF 2009 Cost per 2009 cost per per M low
Cost per M
low
high
LF low
LF high
high
25
Insulation Insulation
2009 Cost 2009 Cost
per M low per M high
Diameter
Inches
A (see
above)
2
64.72
70.85
16.70
17.45
212.26
232.39
54.77
57.23
76.96
84.27
19.63
20.50
252.44
276.39
64.36
67.27
92.59
101.38
23.27
24.32
303.70
332.51
76.33
79.76
108.48
118.76
27.88
29.13
355.81
389.57
91.45
95.55
129.19
141.45
31.60
33.02
423.77
463.96
103.65
108.32
10
166.28
182.05
37.23
38.92
545.40
597.12
122.14
127.64
12
199.39
218.30
43.74
45.72
654.00
716.03
143.49
149.95
14
234.98
257.26
49.37
51.59
770.72
843.82
161.93
169.23
16
279.58
306.09
52.85
55.22
917.02
1,003.99
173.32
181.13
18
327.58
358.64
57.48
60.06
1,074.46
1,176.37
188.51
196.99
above)
2
72.39
79.25
16.70
17.45
237.42
259.94
54.77
57.23
105.99
116.05
23.27
24.32
347.66
380.64
76.33
79.76
129.37
141.64
27.88
29.13
424.33
464.59
91.45
95.55
B (see
151.78
166.18
31.60
33.02
497.84
545.06
103.65
108.32
10
197.29
216.00
37.23
38.92
647.10
708.47
122.14
127.64
12
235.57
257.92
43.74
45.72
772.67
845.96
143.49
149.95
14
285.54
312.62
49.37
51.59
936.56
1,025.39
161.93
169.23
C (see
above)
2
71.51
78.29
16.70
17.45
234.54
256.79
54.77
57.23
104.18
114.05
23.27
24.32
341.68
374.09
76.33
79.76
128.13
140.27
27.88
29.13
420.25
460.10
91.45
95.55
156.14
170.95
31.60
33.02
512.15
560.73
103.65
108.32
10
206.66
226.26
37.23
38.92
677.85
742.14
122.14
127.64
12
235.81
258.18
43.74
45.72
773.46
846.82
143.49
149.95
14
276.85
303.11
49.37
51.59
908.08
994.21
161.93
169.23
above)
2
4
6
76.12
107.74
131.40
83.34
117.96
143.87
16.70
23.27
27.88
17.45
24.32
29.13
249.67
353.40
430.99
273.35
386.91
471.87
54.77
76.33
91.45
57.23
79.76
95.55
D (see
161.09
176.38
31.60
33.02
528.38
578.50
103.65
108.32
10
213.84
234.11
37.23
38.92
701.37
767.90
122.14
127.64
12
253.58
277.63
43.74
45.72
831.73
910.61
143.49
149.95
14
287.60
314.89
49.37
51.59
943.35
1,032.83
161.93
169.23
For OSBL / yard piping (long reasonably straight run piping multiply above values by 0.74
Additional insulation: Add $1.58 for each additional inch.
Piping Unit Prices (Budget Pricing):
26
The following tables include all-inclusive material unit prices and work hours for the
fabrication and installation / erection of process related piping systems in Carbon Steel A
53 / A 106. These unit prices can be used for budget estimating piping on refinery /
chemical plant / manufacturing process plants, the accuracy of these values could be
considered +/- 15%.
Pricing Basis:
Diameter 2009 $
Inches
Cost per
LF low
12.95
0.5
2009 $
Cost per
LF high
2009 $
2009 $
Cost per Cost per
M low
M high
15.55
42.50
50.99
17.85
21.42
58.54
70.26
1.5
24.71
29.66
81.06
97.27
34.55
41.46
113.30
135.97
43.47
52.16
142.59
171.11
56.12
67.34
184.08
220.89
72.31
86.77
237.18
284.61
89.92
107.90
294.92
353.91
10
113.59
136.32
372.59
447.11
12
137.37
164.84
450.57
540.68
14
167.73
201.28
550.17
660.20
16
190.73
228.88
625.59
750.71
18
218.02
261.63
715.12
858.14
27
Notes: multiply above (Material and labor) values by 1.15 1.65 for (Inside Battery
Limits): ISBL applications (higher value for complex applications).
Multiply by 1.07 for 300 # service.
The following is a listing of various material adjustment values (specific to piping)
calibrated against carbon steel A 53, A 36, A 515 and A 285C. These adjustments could
be utilized to determine various OOM budget variables between differing material
specifications (a word of warning this is reasonable for the material content however the
installation / welding activities should separately evaluated, welding of stainless steel
and other exotic materials may require 10-35% more man hours than the welding /
installation of carbon steel piping systems).
The following is a listing of various material adjustment values (specific to piping)
calibrated against carbon steel A 53, A 36, A 515 and A 285C. These adjustments could
be utilized to determine various OOM budget variables between differing material
specifications (a word of warning this is reasonable for the material content however the
installation / welding activities should separately evaluated, welding of stainless steel
and other exotic materials may require 10-35% more man hours than the welding /
installation of carbon steel piping systems). This material uplift is dependent upon size of
order, for large orders use the lower uplift.
Material
PVC (Sch 80)
CPVC (Sch 8)
Base Case - Carbon Steel
Material cost / LF for 2 Diameter A 53
(refer to above table for material cost)
Material
uplift (Low)
0.50
0.60
Material
uplift (High)
0.60
0.70
1.00
1.00
2.40
2.00
1.80
2.70
1.15
1.80
2.40
1.25
1.45
1.50
1.20
1.40
1.40
1.75
4.00
4.20
5.50
2.40
3.10
3.10
5.80
5.50
2.70
2.30
2.00
3.30
1.35
2.00
2.60
1.50
1.65
1.75
1.40
1.60
1.60
2.00
4.50
4.60
6.50
2.70
3.40
3.40
6.20
6.00
The following chart indicates budget-pricing (material only for various types of Stainless
steel tubing / piping) conforming to ASTM 269 and ASTM 270 0.065 wall thickness:
Note: for large orders discounts of 10% -35% are available on the following prices.
Type and Diameter
304 1
304L 1
316L (no polish) 1
AL-6XN (polished ID / OD) 1
317 1
317L 1
321 1
347 1
Admiralty 1
304 Sanitary 1
304 Seamless 1
304 Sanitary 1.5
304 Sanitary 2
304 Sanitary 3
304 Sanitary 4
304 Sanitary 6
MH s per LF
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.30 0.65
0.40 - 0.80
0.30 0.75
N/A
N/A
N/A
Average number of fittings / valves for various C.S. / S.S. piping diameters /
per 1,000 LF of process related piping systems (based on 17 process
related projects) I.S.B.L. work:
Pipe
Diameter
0.5
0.75
1
1.5
2
4
6
8
10
12
18
24
Couplings /
Elbows
unions /
(90 & 45
Flanges (50%) degree)
(30%)
291
305
187
119
91
82
74
64
59
57
33
25
173
110
111
70
55
49
44
38
35
35
21
16
Tees /
concentric
- eccentric
reducers
(10%)
57
52
37
25
18
16
16
13
12
10
7
5
29
Caps / blinds /
plugs &
miscellaneous /
weldolets /
sockolets /
nipples
(10%)
58
54
37
24
18
16
15
13
12
11
6
5
Number of
Fittings
Number of
Valves
579
521
372
238
182
163
149
128
118
113
67
51
372
247
81
35
26
14
12.5
6.75
6.25
5.75
4.35
3.70
Material
$1,717
$3,365
$10,070
Man hours
54 x $53 = Installed cost
58 x $53 = Installed cost
67 x $53 = Installed cost
Material
$1,785
$2,000
$2,489
Man hours
28 x $53 = Installed cost
32 x $53 = Installed cost
37 x $53 = Installed cost
$1.84 $2.94 / SF
$1.63 $2.73 / SF
Diameter
Man hours
2
3
4
6
8
10
12
2.50
3
4
5
7
10
12/16
Unit
SF
SF
Material / Labor
2.94 - 3.62
5.78 7.30
30
Warehouse cooling
Office plumbing
Office heating
Office cooling
Laboratory plumbing
Laboratory heating
Laboratory cooling
Fire protection
(sprinklers)
Ditto extra
hazardous area
CO2 / Haylon
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
5.88 7.46
1.31 2.17
5.51 8.19
4.67 6.72
12.86 17.48
5.25 9.35
4.94 9.03
1.58 3.36
SF
4.46 8.51
SF
4.73 10.45
Demolition & removal of C.S. / S.S. Piping (include hangars, fittings and valves)
Diameter
1
2
3
4
6
8
10
12
$ Cost / 100 LF
13.97
24.10
34.97
46.62
58.12
74.34
88.73
109.04
Ball
$417
$485
$617
$1,233
$2,371
$4,615
$6,177
Butterfly
$938
$956
$1,188
$1,901
$4,099
$4,800
$6,156
Check
$592
$773
$1,172
$1,642
$2,944
$4,347
$5,515
31
Gate
$694
$950
$1,265
$1,847
$4,017
$4,805
$5,986
Globe
$811
$1,063
$1,620
$2,600
$4,781
$9,908
$13,271
Diameter
Man hours
2
3
4
6
8
10
12
2.50
3
4
5
7
10
12/16
Size
Material
Man hours
1x2
2x3
3x4
4x6
$1,746
$3,124
$3,430
$5,098
2.5
3.5
4.5
6.0
For 300 pound rating multiply above material cost by 14%, man hours remain the same
as above:
OOM $ Labor Cost to erect 1,000 FL of pipe with 150 # fittings n/e 15 above grade
or FFL:
$ LF Cost (excludes hangars, testing, valve installation and construction
equipment):
Diameter in inches
A 53 CS Sch 40
Ditto Sch 80
Plastic lined Sch 40
Stainless steel 304
Ditto 316
Glass
C.S. Kynar Lined
1
10.44
15.14
19.54
12.15
12.41
13.60
21.72
2
14.42
21.27
26.36
16.35
16.80
20.37
27.71
4
23.74
32.34
41.05
25.02
25.82
30.98
43.62
6
34.96
51.41
61.97
37.64
38.13
N/A
63.81
8
54.26
72.43
82.71
60.34
62.15
N/A
85.37
10
12
14
16
18
0.11
0.18
0.27
0.37
0.49
0.55
0.63
0.72
0.83
0.65
1.95
2.50
3.30
3.75
4.35
4.85
5.50
6.0
32
Joints /
flanges
Elbows
Reducer
Tees
Valves
0.45
0.85
0.81
1.3
1.25
0.93
1.8
1.73
2.55
2.25
1.35
2.75
2.55
3.85
2.85
1.75
3.65
3.35
5.25
3.35
2.13
3.9
3.73
5.85
3.75
2.25
4.15
4.03
6.25
4.5
2.45
4.45
4.25
6.75
5.5
3.23
6.2
6.15
9.25
6.5
3.33
6.45
6.5
9.75
7.35
Multiply piping handling and cutting values by 1.35 2.35 for ISBL piping
Multiply by 1.15 for 15 25 above grade or FFL.
Multiply by 1.20 for 25- 40 above grade or FFL.
Multiply by 1.15 for SS pipe handling and cutting.
Multiply piping handling and cutting values by 1.45 2.55 SS for ISBL piping
Multiply by 1.75 - 2.25 for SS joints / flanges, elbows, reducers, tees, and valves.
Multiply by 1.09 for 300 # service
Piping Black Iron with screwed fittings includes fabrication and erection labor, material
and hangars.
1 (25 mm)
2 ditto (50 mm)
$19.37 / LF
$31.24 / LF
$63.53 / M
$102.47 / M
$18.43 / LF
$26.57 / LF
$36.49 / LF
$50.56 / LF
$60.45 / M
$87.15 / M
$119.69 / M
$165.84 / M
Glass Pipe includes fabrication and erection labor, material and hangars.
1 (25 mm)
2 ditto (50 mm)
3 ditto (75 mm)
4 ditto (100 mm)
$26.72 / LF
$30.24 / LF
$39.48 / LF
$55.55 / LF
$87.64 / M
$99.19 / M
$129.49 / M
$182.20 / M
$4.46 / LF
$6.61 / LF
$23.31 / LF
$14.63 / M
$21.68 / M
$76.46 / M
$6.04 / LF
$8.24 / LF
$11.24 / LF
$19.81 / M
$27.03 / M
$36.87 / M
33
Unit
SF
Material / Labor
2.94 - 3.62
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
5.78 7.30
5.88 7.46
1.31 2.17
5.51 8.19
4.67 6.72
12.86 17.48
5.25 9.35
4.94 9.03
1.58 3.36
SF
4.46 8.51
SF
4.73 10.45
$ Cost per LF
1.75
2.50
3.45
7.55
$ Cost per M
5.75
8.20
11.30
24.75
For total installed cost with fittings, valves, hangars, etc, multiply by 2.0 to 4.0
$ Cost per
Mile / Low
Range
350,000
400,000
550,000
650,000
900,000
$ Cost per
Mile / High
Range
450,000
500,000
650,000
700,000
1,200,000
$ M Cost
Low
Range
218
249
342
404
559
$ M Cost
High
Range
280
311
404
435
746
Typical split:
Mater pipe 30% - 35%
Labor/ Equip 45% - 50%
Other Eng/CM 2% - 4%
OHP 7% - 10%
Welding OOM Data:
Welding is the activity and work effort that joins metals together. Numerous situations
impact the cost of welding including the following main items:
35
Testing of completed welds i.e. mechanical tests bore scope; destructive tests,
bend tests, ultrasonic, x-ray, dye-penetration, test coupons etc. Together with
appropriate documentation that supports the testing effort.
In welding there are perhaps more than seventy distinct categories or methods of
welding or brazing and soldering. One of the most widely used methods is Shielded
metal arc welding (SMAW) also known as stick or manual metal arc welding, this type of
welding is by far the most widely used welding method used on construction and on
repair type work, the preparation work, cutting, grinding required to form the welding
joints, make the process time consuming, welding by its very nature is very time
consuming and labor intensive effort. The (SMAW) welding method uses a consumable
welding rod electrode (stick), electrical current AC or DC is passed though the welding
rod / stick, great heat is generate and the welding rod melts and forms a weld between
the item being welded and the welding rod, the welding rod is used up in the process.
Other widely used welding applications include TIG welding i.e. tungsten inert gas this
application utilizes individual welding rods, it has a wide application and is used to join
carbon steel, stainless steel, alloys and other metals together (pipe and plates), the
welder strikes an arc on the pipe, plate or fabricated element being welded as described
above. Another widely used welding process is MIG welding i.e. metal inert gas; MIG
welding can be considered more of a factory method of welding. MIG welding make
use of a reel(s) of wire feed of welding rod metal that allows long runs of welding / metal
deposit to be competed, its ideal application is welding steel plates and sections
together, i.e. a shipyard is a good example were one can see this welding method.
Other welding processes include Oxyfuel Gas Welding (OFW), Semi Automatic
Submerged Arc Welding (SAW), Manual and semi automatic Plasma welding (PAW)
and Semi Automatic Gas Tungsten Arc Welding 9GTAW), brazing and soldering uses
liquefied hot metal(s) to connect metals together, brazing creates a stronger linkage than
is the case with soldering, soldering is generally utilized to link / tie small diameter
cables / wire, electrical components and minor metal apparatus / fabrications.
Autogenous welding (completed welds are required to be completely smooth on the
internal and external surface of the tube / piping no joints should be present that could
capture particles flowing through the tube / pipe) is used primarily on Pharmaceutical /
Microchip facilities in piping / tubing applications such as Clean in place (CIP), Steam in
Place (SIP), Water for Injection (WFI) and other critical finished product lines, it is used
to mitigate contamination (bacterial build up) Stainless Steel 316 L is used extensively,
the welding approach utilized is were all the completed welds and the internal surface of
the pipe / tube is required to be joint free / entrapment-free internally to prevent any
bacterial contamination to the finished product. Full penetration (100%) welds should be
aimed for. It is important to understand that any gaps, fissures, fractures including any
imperfect weld joints can entrap the product / fluid flowing through the pipe / tubing, if
any gaps, fissures, fractures are present they can develop into a haven for future
problems and possible product contamination. Automated welding is many times utilized
to lower welding production costs i.e. the main element being the cost of employing a
workforce (labor costs), however the cost of purchasing the welding equipment together
with its subsequent maintenance costs can be substantial, never the less automated
welding is usually the best avenue to proceed on, on major welding projects, the best
example of this is in ship building, just about all the welding is done using an automated
process. Orbital welding is used in Pharmaceutical, Aerospace, Microchip and other HiTech industries. Orbital welding uses the Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW)
methodology; it is used primarily on small-bore piping and tubing 2 diameter and below.
Stainless Steel 316 L and some other alloys that work well in extreme / harsh operating
36
conditions are usually the specified materials that are utilized. Other industry sectors that
are embarking on orbital welding in their construction process include:
Food Production.
Dairy (Milk, Butter and Cheese production).
Brewery / Beverage.
Nuclear / Conventional (Power Facilities).
The Petro Chemical and the Offshore Oil and Gas sector.
These industry sectors look at this approach as a practical and cost effective opportunity
for welding small bore stainless steel piping and tubing. Orbital welding makes available
a process to make sure construction productivity is optimized while also ensuring that
the quality of the finished weld is of a high quality.
Fillet welding using (SMAW) welding process for connecting various carbon steel plates,
vessels, sections, channels and angles together: Labor cost includes transport of welded
metals to the welding area, preparation work, measuring, initial tack welding, final
welding and any necessary grinding.
Thickness in
inches
Unit of
Measure
1/8
3/16"
1/4"
3/8"
1/2"
5/8"
3/4"
7/8
1
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
$ Cost
Range
per LF
16 22
29 - 37
39 51
54 - 71
83 97
100 118
110 137
120 152
131 179
Man hours
per LF *
(Low)
0.18
0.34
0.45
0.62
0.97
1.16
1.28
1.39
1.53
Man hours
per LF *
(High)
0.26
0.43
0.60
0.83
1.12
1.37
1.59
1.77
2.08
$ Cost
Range per
M
51 72
97 121
127 169
175 234
272 317
328 385
361 447
393 500
431 607
Man hours
per M *
(Low)
0.59
1.12
1.48
2.03
3.18
3.80
4.20
4.56
5.02
Man hours
per M *
(High)
0.85
1.41
1.97
2.72
3.67
4.49
5.22
5.81
6.82
Cost per pound of deposited welding material = $13.50 $20.50 (Labor and
material) to use this method determine cubic content of weld.
Weight of metal deposited in 0.25 fillet weld = 0.15 pounds per LF
Weight of metal deposited in 0.25 fillet weld = 0.50 pounds per Meter
Weight of metal deposited in 0.50 fillet weld = 0.30 pounds per LF
Weight of metal deposited in 0.50 fillet weld = 1.00 pounds per Meter
Weight of metal deposited in 0.75 fillet weld = 0.90 pounds per LF
Weight of metal deposited in 0.75 fillet weld = 3.00 pounds per Meter
37
For tee, butt, V groove, bevel, J and U groove welds compare size (area) of weld
and pro-rate above values to determine cost or cubic content of weld.
Insulation
The quantity take-offs for piping assists greatly in determining insulation requirements,
the following are unit prices for both piping and major equipment. (Casil and mineral
wool are more widely used in non flammable applications, foam / cellar glass type
insulation is used in flammable applications)
Casil
Man hours / LF
4.35
0.27
4.46
0.33
2 ditto Alumin,
cover
2 ditto SS cover
4.41
0.33
4.77
0.38
3 ditto Alumin,
cover
3 ditto SS, cover
7.80
0.55
8.76
0.59
Diameter /
Specification
1 thick with
Alumin, cover
1 ditto SS cover
2 ditto Alumin,
cover
2 ditto SS cover
Mineral Wool
Man hours / LF
4.06
0.23
4.29
0.31
4.35
0.32
4.65
0.35
38
SF / $ Material
Cost M.H. s
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
SF / $ Material
Cost M.H. s
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
3 ditto Alumin,
cover
3 ditto SS, cover
8.64
0.54
8.79
0.57
Diameter /
Specification
1 thick with
Alumin, cover
1 ditto SS cover
Foam
Man hours / LF
2.61
0.26
2.97
0.29
2 ditto Alumin,
cover
2 ditto SS cover
3.37
0.30
3.58
0.32
3 ditto Alumin,
cover
3 ditto SS, cover
7.21
0.50
7.39
0.55
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
Foam:
Piping Insulation:
Casil LF/ $ Material Cost
Diameter /
Thickness
2 dia 1 thick with
Alumin, cover
2 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
3 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
3 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
4 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
4 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
6 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
6 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
8 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
8 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
M. H. s
Material Cost / LF
3.66
M.H. / LF x $48 /
Hour
18 ditto
4.04
.22 ditto
4.68
.21 ditto
5.09
.23 ditto
5.70
.20 ditto
6.24
.23 ditto
8.38
.25 ditto
7.74
.21 ditto
10.82
.26 ditto
10.31
.22 ditto
39
SF / $ Material
Cost M.H. s
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
x $48 = installed
cost
8 dia 2 ditto SS
cover
10 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
10 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
16.26
.36 ditto
11.87
.27 ditto
12.63
.33 ditto
Material Cost / LF
3.68
M.H. / LF x $48 /
Hour
.19 ditto
4.12
.22 ditto
4.76
.21 ditto
5.26
.23 ditto
5.73
.20 ditto
6.27
.24 ditto
8.49
.25 ditto
7.78
.21 ditto
10.49
.26 ditto
9.64
.22 ditto
14.54
.35 ditto
12.00
.28 ditto
13.07
.32 ditto
3.68
.36 ditto
4.08
.33 ditto
4.76
.40 ditto
M. H. s
40
Diameter /
Thickness
2 dia 1 thick with
Alumin, cover
2 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
3 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
3 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
4 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
4 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
6 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
6 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
8 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
8 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
8 dia 2 ditto SS
cover
10 dia 1 ditto
Alumin, cover
10 dia 1 ditto SS
cover
Material Cost / LF
M.H. / LF x $48 /
Hour
.23 ditto
3.54
3.40
19 ditto
4.26
.20 ditto
4.70
.25 ditto
5.71
.26 ditto
5.03
.21 ditto
7.75
.28 ditto
8.59
.24 ditto
9.31
.30 ditto
10.75
22 ditto
14.35
.36 ditto
11.67
.27 ditto
12.90
.32 ditto
Cost per
LF
100
150
5
10
15
25
50
75
100
$40.19
$43.96
$47.86
$58.49
$77.91
$91.43
$102.88
$4,019
$4,396
$4,786
$5,849
$7,791
$9,143
$10,288
$6,029
$6,595
$7,179
$8,773
$11,688
$13,714
$15,431
41
250
$10,049
$10,991
$11,965
$14,621
$19,478
$22,859
$25,720
Determine H.P. of each motor and use the above value for 100, 150, or 250, (note the
typical length of cable / conduit from a motor to its panel board station / starter is 150)
this should provide a budget estimate with an accuracy of +/- 10%. The above data is
based on the following specification. Cable tray (75%) / Conduit (25%) cable,
terminations / hook up connections / splicing / fittings, start stop / emergency shut down
disconnect switch (on-off light) and any miscellaneous minor items etc. assumes an M
(45%) & L (55%) split. For explosion proof applications uplift the above values by 20% 35%. Another approach is to count the number of drives and multiply by $16,900, this
value includes MCC s, new starters, cable, cable tray, lightning protection, lighting and
all hook-ups and terminations.
The all in unit material prices and man hour units embody all electrical and bulk
materials and electrical labor scope activities essential for an all-inclusive and working
system, i.e. unloading, temporary warehousing, material distribution, the actual
materials, electrical installation units including if required start / stop push buttons,
breakers, a percentage of the sub station / switch gear / motor control center, conduit /
and or cable tray, pulling and installation of power and control cable, terminators,
miscellaneous brackets / supports, sealing of floor and wall penetrations, system testing
and commissioning. The estimating units are an average of Class 1, 11 and 111
Division 1 & 2 service:
Work Item
Warehouse service & distrib, 600-ampWarehouse lighting & powerWarehouse alarm & emerg lightingOffice service & distrib, 1,000-amp
Office lighting & power
Office alarm & emerg lighting
Laboratory service & distrib, 800-amp
Laboratory lighting & power
Laboratory alarm & emerg lighting
5kV copper 3C wi PVC cover # 1
Ditto 4/0
15 kV ditto # 1
Ditto 4/0Mineral Insul cable 600 v #8
Ditto # 2
Ditto 4/0230 v 5 HP
230 v 10 HP
230 v 25 HP
230 v 50 HP
230 v 100 HP
230 v 250 HP
460 v 5 HP
460 v 10 HP
460 v 25 HP
Unit
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
LF
LF
LF
LF
CLF
CLF
CLF
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
42
Material
1.13
7.09
1.27
1.19
9.22
0.41
1.53
9.26
0.83
9.29
16.75
13.79
23.78
368
756
1,523
788
1,197
1,843
3,612
8,486
21,893
887
898
1,202
M.H.s
incl
incl
incl
incl
incl
incl
incl
incl
incl
.05
.06
.09
4.60
6.50
10
18
24/28
34
48
72
84
18
20/24
28/32
460 v 50 HP460 v 100 HP460 v 250 HP0.5 dia rigid galv, steel conduit1 dia ditto2 dia ditto
4 dia ditto
12 wide galv, cable tray, 6 rung space:
24 ditto
200 Amp panel board 24 circuits
4 x 2 Fluorescent steel, flush 3 lamp
400 watt mercury vapor high bay 120 v
Switch gear 800 amps 120/208 v
25 Aluminum floodlight pole excl, light
Main control room panel
Local panel board
Wire connections 600 V P & C
Ditto 3Kv / 5 Kv:
Ditto 15 Kv:
Rigid metal conduit 1
Ditto 1.25 2
Ditto 2.5 4
Wire / cable 1/C & M/C, # 6 & greater
Ditto 1/C, # 8 & smaller
Power Plant per KW (range)
Ditto 10 KW
Ea
Ea
Ea
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
Ea
LF
LF
Ea
Ea
Ea
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
6
2,105
4,158
52
9,781
96
1.63
.15
3.94
.22
6.67
.27
19.11
.40
11.18
.14
15.12
.22
563.85
12/16
129.57
1.25
456.75
3.50
11,670.75
120
4/6
1,391.25
N/A
28
N/A
24
N/A
0.25
N/A
3.50
N/A
5.00
N/A
0.20
N/A
0.25
N/A
0.60
N/A
0.035
N/A
0.015
$0.47 million - $0.735 million
$4.46 million - $7.19 million
at a precise cost estimate for the instrumentation / process controls scope of work, the
items / data to be reviewed include:
1. Instrumentation list (preliminary or final).
2. Inspection and review of the P & IDs. / related installation drawings.
3. Detailed quantity take-off s. (shopping list of instrument devices & cable / control
wire, etc.).
4. Preliminary / Outline / Detailed specifications / Design Philosophy.
5. Up to date material prices / labor rates / estimating catalogs, etc.
6. Vendor quotes / pricing.
This activity is to say the least is a very time / resource intensive effort and many times
the cost and effort can not be warranted if the proposed project is a study or has a
marginal ROI, many times the instrumentation scope of work can be estimated as a
percentage of the major equipment cost, this is a widely used method. On the other
hand, this approach is imprecise at best; available historical data from many sources in
43
the process related industry confirms that a value of between 15% to 60% of the major
equipment F.O.B. purchase price, will provide sufficient dollars to install a complete
instrumentation system, the split of this dollar value is typically 50 / 50 labor and
materials. Typically at the early stages of a project there is no more than a preliminary
major equipment list and some basic plot plans to be had, when this is the case a useful
estimating approach is to count the major equipment items and multiply this number of
pieces of major equipment by $15,000 to $20,000 the resulting value will provide an
adequate starting dollar budget for the instrumentation scope of work. Another
conceptual estimating method is to count the bubbles on the P. & I. D.s and to multiply
the number of bubbles by $2,460 (L&M 50/50, L = $1,230 M = $1,230). A similar
method is to use $1,500 / $2,500 per I / O for a new control system and $800 / $950 per
I / O for extending an existing control system.
The following is a listing of budget instrumentation costs related to categories of major
equipment, the values include level, flow, pressure, temperature, alarms and devices,
the costs include the purchase, installation, together with 50 of conduit and control
cable, these values are direct costs, add 30- 60% to capture in-direct costs, plus
programming is excluded, these values do no not include control room systems i.e. TDC
3000 type costs, these values are budgetary and can be considered +/- 20% accurate.
Ref #
Major
Equipment
Item
$ Material
Cost
$ Labor
Cost
Total
Man-hours
Compressor
(each stage)
Condenser
Evaporator
Heat
exchanger
Heater
Incinerator
Pressure leaf
filter
Pump
Reactor
Reboiler
Tank Pressure
Tank storage
Tower
Vessel
Pressure
1,939
1,219
3,158
23
6,372
5,808
6,129
4,322
3,879
3,879
10,694
9,687
10,008
81
73
73
13,565
8,379
3,081
8,312
4,311
1,773
21,877
12,690
4,854
156
81
33
1,640
20,570
12,812
2,382
1,696
24,105
13,876
1,153
12,745
6,207
1,441
1,219
18,287
8,689
2,793
33,315
19,019
3,823
2,915
42,392
22,565
22
240
117
27
23
344
163
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
44
Instrument Device
Material $ Cost
M. H. s
excluded
excluded
excluded
149
231
270
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
excluded
184
446
excluded
excluded
excluded
998
excluded
4,279
6,746
9,618
6,694
11,965
19,325
excluded
452
1,859
3,035
3,927
4,573
2,420
1,397
924
205
193
607
914
31,836
55,860
1,607
15,908
357
4,006
111
2.4
3.4
17.5
2.5
3.5
6
2.5
2.1
2.1
6.6
2.5
2.1
2.5
4.4
10.7
16.5
0.8
0.8
1.7
2.1
2.5
excluded
2.4
3.00
4.50
6.00
3.00
4.50
6.00
2.1
4.50
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.50
6.00
6.00
6.00
2.00
2.00
6.50
6.50
220
240
4.50
116
3.00
6.00
2.50
2,373
excluded
1,554
excluded
$174
$1,820
8.50
10.0
2.5
16.0
1.50
2.50
Painting / finishing
robot multi axis 15
pound load electric
servo reach 70
80 reach unit weight
1,050 1,250
pounds (shipped to
site in 4-7 pieces)
Welding robot multi
axis 35 pound load
electric servo reach
60 70 reach unit
weight 800 950
pounds (shipped to
site in 6-9 pieces)
Welding robot multi
axis 60 pound load
electric servo
reach 70 90
reach unit weight
800 950 pounds
(shipped to site in 69 pieces)
Material handling /
packaging / clean
room application
multi axis 15 pound
load electric servo
reach 30 50 unit
weight 120 pounds
(shipped to site in 58 pieces)
Material handling /
packaging / clean
room application
$45,150 - $56,175
Installation man
hours (does not
include integration
/ programming)
6 - 12
$58,275 - $76,650
6 - 10
$63,525 - $85,680
6 - 12
$32,025 - $41,685
4-8
$35,385 - $43,575
4 - 10
46
Integration costs
$73,185 - $88,830
8 - 12
$70,350 - $89,880
6-8
$78,000 - $90,800
12 - 16
$89,250 - $111,300
16 - 20
Note there are currently more than 1,000,000 robotic welding / material handling
machines in operation worldwide in 2003 according to the UN/ECE and this
number is expected to grow dramatically in the next decade or two. Reconditioned machines/ units can cost anywhere from 20 50% of the above
values
47
The following are budget pricing and installation costs associate with a number of
industrial wrappers / palletizes, case erectors roller conveyors and various material
handling equipment. 2009 Pricing Basis:
Type of Equipment
Stretch Wrappers
(Rotating)
Palletizes / Wrapper
Case Erector
Case Sealer
Specification
Cost in $s
Turntable speed 1
10 RPM, Maximum
weight 4,000
pounds, turntable
diameter 60,
maximum load size
48 length x 48
wide x 72 high,
turntable electric
motor 0.75 HP
TEFC motor, plastic
film 50 150 gauge
Footprint of
equipment 15 x 20
2,000 boxes per
hour, maximum
pallet size 48 x 48
Palletized load
height 108
Electrical
requirements 460
Volts, 60 Amps
(Lantech)
10 20 cases per
min, maximum case
size 20 L x 12 W
Electrical
requirements 115
Volts, 20 Amps
10 20 cases per
min, maximum case
size 24 L x 18 W x
18 H
Electrical
requirements 230
Volts, 15 Amps
10,537
Installation Man
hours
10
191,468
22
37,170
14,648
Gravity Feed
Electrically driven
standard duty
25 FPM
4,500 #
N/A
3,500 #
48
Electrically driven
standard duty
25 FPM
7,000 #
Width
Frame
Roller centers
Electric drive
48
4 x 0.25 channel,
with 3 cross braces
3.50
N/A
48
4 x 0.25 channel,
with 3 cross braces
3.50
0.50 HP TEFC AC
motor
$971
$289
48
4 x 0.25 channel,
with 3 cross braces
3.50
0.75 HP TEFC AC
motor
$1,360
Cost
Remarks
$32,424
N/A
$48,153
N/A
$7,219
N/A
$20,496
$6,153
N/A
N/A
The following are SF / M2 costs related to storage racking, the pricing basis is
2009:
Description
$ SF / Cost of
Racking
footprint
$14.18
$29.24
$46.20
$ M2 / Cost of
Racking
footprint
$152.58
$314.62
$497.11
* Allowance for bar coding system: $100,000 - $250,000 for a 30,000 SF / 2,800
M2 Warehouse facilities.
Painting
Primer & 2 coats of paint to the following:
Description
Pipes up to 4 dia / 100 LF
Ditto 4 to 8
Ditto 8 to 10
Ditto 10 to 12
Material
7.14
10.08
25.73
40.64
49
M. H. s
2.50
4.50
6.50
8.00
1.47 3.52
incl
Typically liquids and solids type chemical plants / facilities fall into one of the following
categories / major equipment (M.E.) multipliers. These multipliers apply to North
American plants.
TYPE OF PLANT
Chemical - Liquids
Chemical - Liquids / Solids
Chemical - Solids
Pharmaceutical
Power
Steel
LOW RANGE
M.E. Multiplier
3.75
3.25
2.50
1.75
2.00
1.50
MEDIAN M.E.
Multiplier
5.00
4.50
3.75
2.50
3.30
2.00
HIGH RANGE
M.E. Multiplier
6.25
5.75
5.25
4.50
4.00
2.50
Low Range: In general is an open structure, has a high level of carbon steel piping, an
unsophisticated instrumentation / control system, open shop construction workforce and
a normal construction schedule, most probably located on U.S. gulf coast.
Median Range: More often than not is a combination of enclosed / open structure, has
an assortment of carbon steel and stainless steel piping (60% C.S. and the balance S.S.
or better), a reasonably sophisticated instrumentation / control system, open shop or a
combination of union construction workforce and a normal construction schedule.
High Range: Usually the major equipment is housed in an enclosed structure / building,
has an assortment of carbon steel and a high content of stainless steel piping (30% C.S.
and the balance 70% S.S. or better), has a state of the art instrumentation / control
system, open shop or a combination of union construction workforce and a fast track
construction schedule, is a hazardous process, the process is based on new technology,
the project will utilizes modular construction concepts, the work involves upgrading /
modernizing various systems.
Other factors
Royalties / licensor fees 0.25% - 3.5% of M.E. (could be more in many cases,
use quoted value were possible)
Vendor assistance 0.5% 1.5% of M.E.
Spare Parts 2.5% to 5% of major equipment cost
Spare Parts 5% to 7.5% of major equipment on complex process facilities
Operator Training 0 to 2.5% of major equipment
Operator training 2.5% to 5% of major equipment on complex process facilities
Freight 3% to 5% of major equipment cost.
Overtime / shift work 0 10% of direct labor, plus the same value specific to the
indirect values less the design effort.
50
As has been mentioned earlier a good cost estimator / cost engineer is an invaluable
asset to any organization, just as a bad cost estimator / cost engineer could be a real
danger to any profit motivated organization. The successful cost estimator / cost
engineer must have an open and inquiring mind, he or she must have a command /
knowledge of process related business intelligence, he or she must be a speed reader
of trade publications, vendor publication data / pricing, cost related journals / cost
estimating articles / publications, he or she must keep up to date with computer /
technology advances, new estimating tools / data bases and electronic cost sources,
computerized spreadsheet methods, new construction equipment and support systems,
and product modifications that take place on a constant basis in todays construction
industry, he or she must be able to estimate the margin between what the business will
bear and what the real cost is to execute the EPC project. An in depth exploration /
search / assessment of current specific data sources / published work dealing with
capital cost estimating and specifically Process related Conceptual / Front End
Estimating indicates a real need for current / real time comprehensive front end /
conceptual capital cost estimating data. There is a fair amount of detailed cost
estimating data in the marketplace, much of it biased towards general construction, i.e.
housing, schools, office building, hotels, etc, but no one publication has been developed
to service Front End Conceptual Estimating for work specific to the process /
manufacturing / chemical / refinery industries, hence the reason for the production of
this data source, rookie cost estimators / engineers frequently find difficulty in obtaining
rules of thumb / historical norms / instructions / tutoring on how to prepare / compile a
Front End / Conceptual Cost Estimate, it is the intent that this database / document and
subsequent updates will fill / satisfy this current void.
TYPICAL DETAILED EPC ENGINEERING MAN-HOUR BREAKDOWN:
The following is a characteristic Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC)
detailed breakdown of detailed design man-hours for a process related project. The
data is based on historical data for small to large ($3-$65 million T.I.C.) sized projects,
This EPC effort is many times executed on a lump sum basis with change orders for
additional or reduced scope.
Detailed (EPC) Engineering Man-hour Breakdown
Function
Project Management
Description / Task
Project Manager /
Project Engineer
Chemical / Process
Engineering Design
Civil / Structural
(Drawings & spec)
Architectural
(ditto)
Electrical (ditto)
Instrumentation (ditto)
Mechanical (ditto)
Building services /
utilities / piping
S/T
Civil / Structural /
52
Man-hour
Percentage
M.H. s on a typical
10,000 assignment
7.50%
750
1,900
Architectural (ditto)
(Engineering
Deliverables)
Contracts / Procurement
Equipment (ditto)
Piping (P & I Ds) (ditto)
Electrical (ditto)
Instrumentation (ditto)
Mechanical (ditto)
S/T
Purchasing / Contracts
Inspection QA / QC
Expediting /
Transportation
S/T
Estimating / Estimating
Database Mgmt
Cost Engineering /
Return Data
Planning / Scheduling
Value Engineering
Accounting
Computer support / IT
Library /Technology
services
RFQ s / Bidding /
Proposals / Sales
S/T
Secretaries
Document control
Office admin / HR
Construction support /
Safety
S/T
Total
3.50
14.50
5.00
6.00
5.50
43.00%
3.50
1.50
1.50
4,300
6.50%
3.50
650
2.50
2.50
0.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
12.50%
3.50
1,250
5.00
1.00
2.00
11.50%
100.00 %
1,150
10,000 M.H. s
The above would typically be between 9% and 14% of the Direct Construction and in
direct cost. Construction Management would be 4% to 7% of the same cost.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT & PROJECT CONTROL
INFORMATION
The subsequent lists below are typical reporting deliverables required for a $10-$65
million process related EPC project.
Project
Management
1
Deliverables
Weekly
BiWeekly
Monthly
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Engineering /
Detailed
Design /
Design
Control
1
2
3
4
5
and Construction Vs
planned performance.
Project safety report
30 day look ahead
schedule
Detailed CPM schedule
update
PM work hours spent to
date compared to original
budget
Scope
of
Work
modification report
EPC S Curves
Approved client C.C.
report
X
X
X
X
X
X
Deliverables
Weekly
BiWeekly
Monthly
54
Procurement /
Materials
Management /
Contracts /
Q.A.-Q.C.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Accounting
Reports
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Deliverables
Weekly
BiWeekly
Monthly
Purchase Inquires /
Requisitions issued, biweekly
Purchase Orders placed,
bi-weekly / Monthly
status report
Contracts placed, biweekly
Current commitment
report, monthly
Inspection Reports, QA /
QC monthly
M.E. status report
Expediting Record
Report / M.E. Status
report
Procurement Summary
Executive Report,
monthly
Long lead delivery status
report
Warranty / spare parts
status
Deliverables
X
X
X
X
X
Invoice to clients
Invoices from vendors
Invoices from sub
contractors
Payments received
Payments to vendors
Payments to sub
contractors
Payments to 3rd parties
total accounting reports
Accounting report /
Accruals / Commitment
report / Expense status
reports / Expended to
date report
Back charge register /
scrap salvage report /
consumables report
55
Weekly
BiWeekly
Monthly
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Construction
Management /
Field
Activities
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Deliverables
Weekly
BiWeekly
Monthly
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note this field information / reporting system is issued to both the P M and
Project Control groups for integration into the PM monthly status report.
Project
Control
Issues
1
Deliverables
Weekly
BiWeekly
Monthly
X
56
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
X
X
Note there are other project specific reports in addition to the above, such as:
realize that starting off there career in Project Controls can be a smart move, more and
more Project Control engineers are being promoted to Project Managers and eventually
migrating into the ranks of upper management. Many owner type companies i.e. Fortune
500 companies and some of the major EPC companies have dedicated staffing (data
retrieval / collection) resources that collect / calibrate in-house proprietary return
historical material costs and man hour data production rates that is calibrated for use on
there future capital projects. Topics the cost estimator / engineer must consider that
could impact the final cost of a project includes the following:
A mixed bag of numbers is of little use to anyone involved in the construction process if
its estimate basis is not consistent and the estimating effort is not fully thought out, i.e.
the scope of work and the estimate format are flawed. The point and focus of this frontend / conceptual estimating database is to provide an up to date tool for construction
professionals that will assist in the compilation of more accurate, timely and dependable
front end / conceptual CAPEX estimates. Conceptual / Front End cost estimating is a
tremendous business tool, as we all know many times the scope and timing of capital
projects will typically be subject to change during the projects life cycle, however this
resource / tool can be used to give details or support the decisions and the genesis of
the project(s) scope and how it was developed and possibly modified, the front end /
conceptual estimate can be used as the audit trail of why it was adjusted, it can present
the history of what was originally (scoped out) and estimated / planned versus what was
actually engineered and built, used correctly the conceptual estimator can benchmark
his or hers conceptual estimating library with the return cost / man-hour data from the
completed project and calibrated there current library for future front end / conceptual
activities. Bear in mind that the Cost Estimator / Cost Engineer is a vital member of the
Project management team, his or hers suggestions and advice can have a major impact
on the future of the EPC project.
58