Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by Martha E. Gimenez
and the most oppressed, the time has come not just to retrieve the
Marxist heritage in feminist thought but to expand Marxist
Feminist theory in ways that both incorporate and transcend the
contributions of postmodern theorizing.
The justification for using Materialist Feminism rather than
Marxist Feminism is the alleged insufficiency of Marxist Theory
for adequately explaining the oppression of women. Lurking
behind the repeated statements about the the shortcomings of
Marxism there is an economistic and undialectical understanding
of Marx and Marxist theory. That Marx may not have addressed
issues that 20th century feminists consider important is not a
sufficient condition to invalidate Marx's methodology as well as
the potential of his theory of capitalism to help us understand the
conditions that oppress women. But regardless of those
pronouncements, it is fascinating, in retrospect, to read the theory
produced by self- defined Materialist Feminists and realize that
they are actually using and developing Marxist theory in ways that
belie statements about its inherent shortcomings. And it is
important to know how Kuhn and Wolpe, authors of FEMINISM
AND MATERIALISM (1978) define the term materialism; they
adopted Engels' definition of the term: "According to the
materialist conception, the determining factor in history is, in the
final instance, the production and reproduction of immediate life.
This, again, is of a twofold character: on the one side, the
production of the means of existence, of food, clothing and shelter
and the tools necessary for that production; on the other side, the
production of human beings themselves, the propagation of the
species" (Engels, [1883] 1972, p.71)(Kuhn and Wolpe, 1978: 7).
Kuhn, Wolpe and the contributors to their book in various ways
expanded the scope of historical materialism to produce new
knowledges about the oppression of women under capitalism. But
materialist feminism, a term which may have been useful in the
past might have lost its effectivity today. How useful is it to
broaden the meaning of Materialist Feminism today to encompass
Marxist Feminism if, at the same time, the term is claimed by
cultural materialists whose views are profoundly anti-marxist?
How will the new generations learn about the theoretical and
political importance of historical materialism for women if
historical materialist analysis is subsumed under the Materialist
Feminist label? Doesn't this situation contribute to the
marginalization of scholars who continue to self-identify as
Marxist Feminists? I understand Marxist Feminism as the body of
theory produced by feminists who, adopting the logic of analysis
of historical materialism, expand the scope of the theory while
critically incorporating useful insights and knowledges from
non-marxist theorizing, just as Marx grappled with the discoveries
12 van 12
10/03/2016 2:41