Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction to Primavera P6
1.1 Introduction
Primavera was launched in 1983 by Primavera Systems Inc. and was acquired by Oracle
Corporation in 2008.Primavera software includes project management, product
management, collaboration and control capabilities and integrates with other enterprise
software such as Oracle and SAPs ERP systems.
1.2 History
Products and versions
As of 2008 Primavera Systems supported long-established products - P3 and Sure-Trak and the newer P6 version. The long-standing P3 product in its various forms was used by
25% of the heavy construction industry, its predominate customer base; the next most
popular software was used by 11%.Nearly 40% of general contractors with an annual
revenue of $5M to $10M used Primavera P3. In comparison the P6 version did not
register in a CFMA 2008 survey of the United States construction industry. The P3
version to P6 version change is based in a move from DOS-type shortcut keys to mousebased icons. Thus a software application that was once very fast to use but grounded in
shortcut functions (which some users found difficult to master) moved to a mouse-based
application that is quicker to learn, but once mastered never achieves the same speed of
use. The Primavera Project Planner DOS core launched in 1983and the P3 Windows
interface launched in 1994.
After a 27-year version life, Oracle ceased sales of the P3 and SureTrak versions on
December 31, 2010.
In 2012, Primavera P6 EPPM Upgrade Release 8.2 added capabilities for governance,
project-team participation, and project visibility. Mobile PPM was introduced through
Primaveras P6 Team Member for iPhone and Team Member Web Interface, to streamline
communications between project team members in the field and in the office. In addition,
Primavera P6 Analytics Release 2.0 gained new enterprise-reporting tools and dashboards
for monitoring and analyzing performance data, including geospatial analysis.
Organizations could also investigate comparative trends and cause-and-effect in multiple
projects with Primavera Contract Management Release 14 as it included the reportwriting capabilities of Oracle Business Intelligence Publisher.
In April 2013 Oracle Corporation announced the release of version 8.4 of Primavera P6
Enterprise Project Portfolio Management. This version incorporated material from
Oracle's acquisitions of Skire and Instantis in 2012.
Primavera P6 Analytics
Primavera Contractor
Primavera Unifier
1.4 Primavera P6
The recognized standard for high-performance project management Primavera P6 Professional
Project Management, handles large-scale, highly sophisticated and multifaceted projects.
Organize projects of up to 100,000 activities with unlimited resources and an unlimited number
of target plans
With Primavera applications, you can rigorously enforce a consistent process and
workflow, from requests for information (RFIs) to change orders. And with the sound
Primavera documenting capabilities, you can ensure accountability for all project partici
pants as well as collaboration across the team. The Primavera product line also enables
you to manage updated contracts and maintain rigorous change order processes to reduce
claims.
Boost Profitability through Standardization
Primavera solutions enable you to standardize your business processes and best practices
across all your projects. With everyone using common tools to communicate, you
enhance
With projects located throughout the region and the world, you need a project
management solution that can scale precisely to your needs. Only the Primavera product
line brings you a system that is 100 percent accessible over the Web and as easy to
deploy and use in your home office as it is in the field.
Avoid Costly Surprises
Primavera solutions provide immediate access to critical project information for realtime, informed decision-making. With superior analysis and forecast metrics, you will
spot prob
lems early, mitigate risks, and make practical course correctionslong before a crisis
occurs.
Optimize Labor, Equipment, and Materials With the Primavera product line, you can balance
all resource requirements across multiple projects for labor, materials, and equipment. Its
resource management and capacity planning functionality lets you identify capacity
requirements for meeting future project and program needs.
business processes and evaluate and mitigate project risks with organizationwide
visibility into project-level leading indicators, project performance metrics, and actualcost worksheets. You can perform multiple analysesby division, owner, type of
project, funding source, and moreand access real-time information for sound decisionmaking through intuitive, personally configurable dashboards.
Assess Project Performance
Primavera solutions help you meet business objectives by aligning your projects and
programs with strategic business objectives through advanced what-if scenario modeling,
capacity analysis, tabular scorecards, rich graphics, and resource optimization. With
powerful analytics, you can see across projects to prioritize your backlog, plan and
allocate resources, proactively manage your business, and easily communicate the
performance of projects and programs to stakeholders. With dynamically linked
graphical analysis, you can control cash flow by quickly tracking current and future cash
flow impact and other critical business metrics across your programs.
Control Job Costs
With Primavera solutions, you can monitor performance across multiple projects at a
glance, all the way to completion. Configurable key project performance indicators,
includ ing actuals-based performance forecasts, foster proactive action so your projects
are kept on
summarizes cost details across multiple projects, so you can track program costs at every
step. You can group and organize information in an easy-to-read spreadsheet to quickly
understand variances.
processes and challenges that architecture, engineering, and construction firms face
today, enabling them to
Chapter 2
Planning in Scheduling in Primavera
Chapter 3
Literature Review
Portfolio
Management
(PPM)
solutions
for
the
construction
industry
Galloway(2007)Primavera is suitable for project-oriented and mature companies that one can
mainly find in developed countries. However, Primavera can rarely be found in the transitional
economies. Furthermore, while Primavera was once mostly used to handle large and complex
projects, today it is also used for many projects valued at under $100 000 Kim .K (2012)
The first version of Microsoft Project (www.microsoft.com/project/) was released for the DOS
platform in 1984. The application was designed primarily as an easy-to-use tool. Since its birth,
the MS Project has always been a popular tool among the project managers , but has never
become the number one PM tool. This is even more evident in the construction industry, as it was
never entirely aligned with the industry's special processes and procedures
Along with the managerial purposes, the PMS can also serve as a quality management
system. Thus, it can act as an enabler of the PM and IS improvement and as such, it plays
an integral part in managements of the construction projects [ ]. Furthermore, today's
PM standards, i.e. BS 6079- 1:2002 and BS 6079-2:2000 define and advocate the use of
the IS/IT in project management. The presence of the PMS becomes even more important
when considering the fact that many construction organizations in the transitional
economies have no such system in place as the management education was not present in
SEE during the socialist regime . Therefore, any improvement of the PMS will probably
influence the industry's performance
Gala (http://gala-construction-software.com/) stepped onto the market in 2003 as a PMS for the
SEE construction industry. It uses a large database of normative work, material, equipment, and it
provides analysis of the cost. While the SEE civil engineering standards aid managers in
producing the estimates, Gala is aligned with the SEE business conduct and it supports on-site
management and procedures prescribed by local regulations. Through the double loop learning,
GALA also supports quality assurance in PM. However, its application in a multi-project
environment is of a limited use.
If a construction company wants to implement a PMS that is aligned with the SEE business
conduct, in our review of the three PMSs, we concluded that it should use the Gala.
However, if it wants to implement a detailed enterprise portfolio project management (EPPM),
made for the environment of developed economies, it should use the Primavera, and lastly if it
wants to use a simple multi- purpose tool, it should use the MS Project
useless. At the end of the day, the plan is summarized on a single page
with the key information for that days activities. The paper concludes
with the education required for todays construction process and
emphasizes that eh skills need to be taught using basic tools so that
the skills are learned rather than the software being learned so the
software can eventually be another helpful tool, rather than a crutch
used in place of the construction knowledge.
3.2Techniques
Chevron in Alaska: The Quest for Oil and Natural Gas in America's
Largest State
With the help of Primavera P6, the organization is streamlining its business processes,
and building a more collaborative environment across Alaska. Averon (2012
Chevron is one of the world's largest integrated energy companies and the leading
marketer of refined products in North America. Its interests range from exploring and
producing oil and natural gas to manufacturing, marketing and transportation, chemicals
manufacturing and sales, geothermal and power generation. The company is also
committed to developing "green" alternative fuels to meet the rising global demand for
clean energy.
The Challenge: Coordinating multiple projects across a vast region
Chevron's U.S. upstream operations are concentrated in the San Joaquin Valley in
California, the near shore and deepwater Gulf of Mexico, the MidContinent states of
Alabama, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming, and onshore
and offshore Alaska.
Although Chevron has an interest on the Alaska North Slope, Chevron's affiliate Union
Oil Company of California has an extensive investment in the Cook Inlet Basin in the
Southcentral area of the state, where it operates 10 oil rigs and five producing natural gas
fields. Responsibility for maintaining and upgrading the organization's current facilities,
as well as developing new above ground infrastructure, lies with the Facilities
Engineering Group.
"We have multiple projects that are using the same crews and resources, and we're trying
to manage all of these as one big project," says Bill Davidson, FE project planner for
Chevron's Facilities Engineering Group.
Making that difficult was the fact that many of the Group's projects were siloed. "We've
probably got 50 projects going at any given time and about $60 to $80 million dollars
worth of projects that we're working on," explains Tom Gould, FE projects coordinator
for
Chevron's
Facilities
Engineering
Group.
"We were using another scheduling tool, which meant an individual file for each
schedule, and we couldn't manipulate the data. We had poor integration of our projects
and no one was sure who was doing what."
The need for visibility
Without visibility into its projects across Alaska, the Group had no way of mitigating
construction delays. "We don't want to start construction on a particular project until
another project finishes because they may share the same crew," says Davidson. "If
construction on the first project is delayed, it also pushes out the other project. We needed
a
way
to
coordinate
that."
Chevron was also having difficulty monitoring the progress of its projects. The inability
to integrate costs with schedules made it difficult for project managers to be sure of
whether
they
were
on
time
and
on
budget.
what
we
want
from
it."
"We now have the capacity to link projects and let the logic flow," he adds. "It's easy to
filter for certain types of projects to look at how they play against each other. For
example, we can request data for a particular platform project, or for all the projects
being
handled
by
one
project
manager."
the
work
must
be
addressed
in
advance.
Future plans include using the integrated schedules to forecast cash flow. For example, by
comparing how much the organization planned to spend in January and February with
how projects actually changed the forecast during that time, the Group will be able to get
updates on whether their cost forecasts will be accurate going forward, and take the
necessary
steps
to
stay
on
track.
of
the
data
in
the
schedules."
If it's Alaska, it's Primavera One unexpected benefit of implementing Primavera has been
a boon to its hiring efforts. In the search for schedulers to work on its many projects,
Chevron discovered that nearly all of those in the oil and natural gas industry in Alaska
are experienced in Primavera. "So moving to Primavera gave us a much wider pool of
people
available
to
develop
schedules,"
says
Centralized
Gould.
data
are
working
from
the
same
real-time
data.
The Facilities Engineering Group is now developing project controls resources and
hoping to add a cost expert to the team. The Drilling department also uses Primavera and
plans are underway to add additional departments -- Maintenance and Major Equipment,
for example -- and eventually provide access to outside contractors. "Slowly but surely,
the majority of people working in Alaska will be using the Web-based Primavera solution
to
access
information
from
the
centralized
database,"
says
Gould.
to
hold
back.
"We'll be able to see how we're doing against the budget, whether we have the right
projects underway and whether our costs are accurate," says Gould.
There are also plans to integrate Primavera with the organization's SAP financials system.
For now, planned costs are managed in Primavera, while actual costs are captured in SAP.
"We'd like to integrate that so we can report on both those things from one platform,"
explains Gould.
To date, most of the resourcing is focused on construction and project managers.
However, going forward, Gould and Davidson say they want to extend that to manage
construction
crews
as
well.
And finally, their mission is to set the stage for Primavera as the companywide standard
in a few years. "Other areas of Chevron are watching us to see if, given our experience,
the solution would work across the unit," says Davidson. "Ultimately, it has the potential
to
be
expanded
across
Chevron."
"Chevron made a decision to invest additional money in the Cook Inlet region, and the
visibility gained through Primavera is allowing us to better manage the asset development
portion
of
the
work,"
says
Gould.
"There's no question that we are going to continue building our success with Primavera,"
Gould adds. "The benefit today is that we now have a portfolio-type schedule that's
linked with the schedules of other groups in the building. We can manage the big picture
in terms of how they all interact with each other rather than as separate entities.
"And the ability to link those schedules with costs in one program? That's Nirvana."
Chapter 4
Construction Management
Chapter 6
Conclusion
Literature Review
Edit 0 8
References
"Chevron in Alaska: The Quest for Oil and Natural Gas in America's
Largest State." Integrated Project Management Solutions. Nu
Solutions Consulting, 2011. Web. 16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.nusolutions.com/chevron_casestudy.php>.
Primavera P6 Migration
Case Study:
Turner Construction, Inc.
OnTrack Scheduling worked closely with Turner Construction,
Sacramento Business Unit, to leverage the
value-added benefits of Primaveras latest software release,
conducting a full scale conversion from its
existing use of P3 and SureTrak, to a server-based P6 platform in a
few short weeks.
Project Goal
The goal of the P6 implementation was to create a unified scheduling
process that standardized the myriad
of project schedules developed within Turner for projects ranging
from $40 - $600 million in value.
The Process
First, OnTrack performed an assessment of Turners current project
load to determine the scope of work
for the conversion. We conducted an inventory of all projects
currently under construction, identifying the
standards
Setup Enterprise Project Structure (EPS)*
Setup Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS)*
Setup and implementation of the Administrative Access Rights and
Security settings
Joint development of methods to further advance the
implementation of Lean Principles
Development of a Sharepoint site to serve as the central
communications hub for all things
Scheduling Related
Provided archive location for over 100 legacy projects
Ongoing Support
OnTrack continues to provide individual training to in-house project
schedulers, project executives,
project managers, superintendents and project engineers. We also
re-introduced the concept of
regularly scheduled informal internal P6 Users Group meetings.
Benefits and Results
In addition to creating a central repository for all Turner projects, the
in advance.
"We're using Primavera to determine whether or not we might be
exceeding our capacity," says Davidson. "We can look at all the
projects underway on that platform and see how many people are
likely to be on it at a certain time. We can move projects around or
link them up to make sure we're not courting danger because of too
many people on that platform."
The ability to predict simultaneous operations is also saving the
organization money by eliminating the potential for unnecessary
mobilization costs. In the past, it was possible for people to be
transported to a platform only to be turned away for lack of space.
Integrated costs and schedules
With the help of Primavera P6, Chevron can now keep a closer eye
on the money. The integration of costs and schedules allows the
organization to look at performance across the portfolio and make
decisions based on its projects collectively.
"We've got planned value in Primavera. We can spread the cash flow
out. We can look at what we plan to spend, and as committed value
comes in, we can see where we are," says Gould.
In addition, Primavera's Web-based dashboard will allow senior
References
"Chevron in Alaska: The Quest for Oil and Natural Gas in America's
Largest State." Integrated Project Management Solutions. Nu
Solutions Consulting, 2011. Web. 16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.nusolutions.com/chevron_casestudy.php>.