Marking Criteria 2014 v1.0

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15
Copyright Notice
This document, all its contents (including images, text, procedures) are copyright 2014, Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. All rights reserved.
Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. Unit 2, 3 Packard Avenue Castle Hill NSW 2154 Australia.
Phone: +61 2 9634 2144. Email: contact@rea.org.au
REA, Re-Engineering Australia, the Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Logo, and other associated logos are trademarks of Re-Engineering Australia
Foundation Ltd. All rights reserved.
F1 in Schools: F1 in Schools, F1iS, Formula 1 in Schools, the F1 in Schools challenge, and the associated logos are trademarks of F1 in Schools.
Formula 1: F1, Formula 1, and the associated logos are trademarks of Formula 1 Licensing BV.
Reproduction
This document may only be reproduced by schools registered in the F1 in Schools program in Australia. Non-participating schools in Australia and
overseas must first seek permission from Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. prior to reproducing.
Version 1.0 May 2014
3|P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREAMBLE ..........................................................................................................................................................5
MARKING CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................................5
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: CADET CLASS ................................................................................................ 6
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: DEVELOPMENT CLASS ..................................................................................... 8
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: PROFESSIONAL CLASS ................................................................................... 10
ENGINEERING SCORE CARD ..................................................................................................................... 12
PORTFOLIO & DISPLAY SCORE CARD ........................................................................................................ 13
VERBAL PRESENTATION SCORE CARD ....................................................................................................... 14
JUDGING FEEDBACK FORM ...................................................................................................................... 15
ENQUIRIES ........................................................................................................................................................16
4|P a g e

PREAMBLE
This document provides detailed information about the Assessment Criteria Judges will use at State and National Finals
and is designed to be read in conjunction with the current Rules and Regulations.
The key performance indicators in the Score Cards are used by the judges to determine points awarded for all judging
activities.
MARKING CRITERIA
The total maximum number of marks available is 900 and will be distributed as per the following judging criteria.
Engineering: 235 marks in total consisting of:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Specifications: 60 marks
Form & Finish: 15 marks
CAD & Analysis: 85 marks
Manufacturing: 45 marks
Technical Merit: 30 marks
Portfolio & Pit Display: 220 marks in total consisting of:

6.
7.
8.
9.
Portfolio: 60 marks
Marketing: 40 marks
Pit Display: 40 marks
F1 Design Process: 80 marks
Verbal Presentation: 220 marks in total consisting of:

10. Technique: 40 marks
11. Composition: 30 marks
12. Subject Matter: 150 marks
Race: 225 marks in total consisting of:
13. Grand Prix Race: 175 marks
14. Fastest Reaction Time: 20 marks
15. Knockout Race: 30 marks
5|P a g e
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: CADET CLASS

For clarification on individual rules refer to the 2013/2014 Season Australian Rules & Regulations.
A points deduction against failed specifications will be applied. General tolerance +/- 0.5mm & - 0.5g.
PENALTY
APPLIED
1A: DIMENSIONAL SPECIFICATIONS
PASS/FAIL
or
POINTS
DEDUCTION
RULE
RULE OVERVIEW
DIMENSIONS
3d
OVERALL LENGTH
170 < L <210
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3e
OVERALL WIDTH
Min 60
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3f
MASS
Min 55g
BALLAST
-4
3g
TRACK CLEARANCE (LOWEST POINT INC. GUIDES)
3k
BALSA COMPONENT THICKNESS
3l
CONVEX EDGES (ZERO TOLERANCE)
4a
WIDTH AT SIDEPODS
4b
SIDEPOD PROJECTED AREA
Min 2
-4
Min 3.5
-1
Min R 1.5
-1
Min 50
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 30 x 15
Min 60 x 40 x 8
(x, y, z)
Min 15 x 15 x 26
(x, y, z)
-1
4c
VIRTUAL CARGO
[0.10 TIME]
-2
4e
NO CAR BODY IN VOLUME 15MM REAR OF FRONT WHEEL
[0.05 TIME]
-1
6e
FRONT AEROFOIL AIR SPACE
Min 3.5
[0.05 TIME]
-1
6f
REAR AEROFOIL AIR SPACE
Min 3.5
[0.05 TIME]
-1
6l
FRONT AEROFOIL SPAN
Balsa: Min 34
[0.10 TIME]
-2
6m
FRONT AEROFOIL CHORD
6n
FRONT AEROFOIL THICKNESS
6o
REAR AEROFOIL SPAN
6p
REAR AEROFOIL CHORD
6q
REAR AEROFOIL THICKNESS
7l
FRONT WHEELS MAX HEIGHT OF OBSTRUCTION
Max 15mm
9b
TETHERLINE GUIDE SEPARATION
120 < l < 190
-1
9c
TETHERLINE GUIDE HOLE
3.5 < D < 5
-2
Min 15
-2
Balsa: 3.5 < T < 12
-2
Balsa: Min 34
[0.10 TIME]
-2
Min 15
-2
Balsa: 3.5 < T < 12
-2
[0.05 TIME]
-1
10b
CHAMBER DIAMETER
D = 19
-1
10c
DEPTH OF CHAMBER
50 < D < 60
-1
10d
CHAMBER HEIGHT
10e
CHAMBER WALL THICKNESS TOTAL OF ALL MATERIALS
Min 22
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
-1
Total Dimensional Penalties
1B: REGULATION SPECIFICATIONS

RULE
PENALTY
APPLIED
PASS/FAIL
POINTS
or DEDUCTION
RULE OVERVIEW
1l
3 AXIS CNC SIDE MACHINING ONLY 1 MIRRORED NC CODE, 6MM CUTTER
1p
ENTRY NUMBER STICKER SIZE AND VISIBILITYMAX OF 25MM L X 15MM H
-1
1q
REAS NATIONAL SPONSORS LOGOS APPLIED (REA, DMO, F1, AUTODESK)
-2
1r
REA & F1 STICKERS ON OPPOSING SIDEPODS AND MIN OF 25MM L X 15MM H
-2
3a
WHEEL PROFILES 100% VISIBLE & UNOBSTRUCTED FROM SIDE & ABOVE
DISQUALIFIED
[0.10 TIME]
-2
6|P a g e
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: CADET CLASS

3b
THE F1 CAR PRODUCT LEGAL ELEMENTS
-2
3c
CENTRE OF GRAVITY REMAINS BETWEEN AXLES WITH CANISTER INSERTED
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3i
ONE COMPONENT FROM A SINGLE STANDARD REA SUPPLIED BALSA WOOD BLANK DISQUALIFIED
3j
BALSA DEFAULT MATERIAL FOR ALL NON ROTATING PARTS
DISQUALIFIED
3m
IMPLANTS, FOREIGN OBJECTS OR VOIDS PROHIBITED
[0.10 TIME]
-2
4d
VIRTUAL CARGO CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
-2
5b
NOSE CONE NON-METALLIC MATERIAL NOT PRESENT BEHIND AXLE CENTRE LINE
-1
6a
FRONT AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH FRONT AXLE IN FRONT OF CENTRE LINE
-1
6b
FRONT AEROFOIL CONNECTION WITH NOSECONE ONLY
-1
6c
REAR AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH REAR AXLE BEHIND CENTRE LINE
-1
6d
REAR AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH REAR WHEEL ABOVE WHEEL
-1
6g
AEROFOILS TOP SURFACES 100% VISIBLE FROM CAR TOP - ABOVE
-1
7a
4 CYLINDRICAL WHEELS
7b
ALL WHEELS AND FULL TRACK CONTACT NO CAMBER (ZERO TOLERANCE)
-2
7c
WHEEL DIMENSIONS CONSISTENCY ACROSS TRACK CONTACT
-2
7d
TRACK CONTACT SURFACE OF ALL 4 WHEELS FREELY ROTATING
[0.05 TIME]
-1
7e
4 UNMODIFIED REA STANDARD WHEELS
[0.10 TIME]
-2
8a
WHEEL SUPPORT SYSTEM PROJECTED CYLINDER VOLUME
-2
8b
4 UNMODIFIED REA AXLE GROMMETS
-2
8d
BRASS DEFAULT MATERIAL FOR AXLES - NO OTHER MATERIAL PERMITTED
-2
8e
NO MODIFICATIONS TO WHEEL SUPPORT SYSTEM
-2
9a
TETHER LINE GUIDES SECURITY & LOCATION ON CENTRE LINE
[0.10 TIME]
-2
-1
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
9d
TETHER LINE GUIDES CLOSED FOR SAFETY
-1
9e
TETHER LINE GUIDES ADEQUATE STRENGTH AND FIXING
9f
NO TETHER LINE GUIDE ARRANGEMENTS WITH SHARP EDGES
9g
TETHER LINE GUIDES & SUPPORTS NO OTHER STRUCTURAL FUNCTION
9h
2 REA STANDARD TETHER LINE GUIDES
-1
9i
TETHER LINE GUIDES LOCATED IN 6MM X 6MM SLOT
-1
10f
PAINT AND OTHER FOREIGN IN CO2 CARTRIDGE CHAMBER
-1
10g
CARTRIDGE INSERTION AND WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT REMOVAL OF PARTS
-1
-1
-1
[0.10 TIME]
-2
Total Regulation Penalties
Total Specification Score

(Deduct dimensional & regulation penalty total from 60 points)
/60
Total TIME Penalties
2. FORM & FINISH (A MEASURE OF MANUFACTURING QUALITY, ASSEMBLY & FINISH OF PRIMARY & BACKUP CARS)
1
2
3
4
Cars dissimilar to each other &
significant difference to design.
Poor finish.
10
11
Cars similar to each other and the design. Good

overall finish.
12
13
14
15
Excellent symmetry for each
car and design match.
Excellent finish.
SCORE
/15
2014 Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd
7|P a g e
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: DEVELOPMENT CLASS

For clarification on individual rules refer to the 2014/2015 Season Australian Rules & Regulations. Car 1 = Primary Race Car & Car 2 = Back-up Race Car.
Both Car 1 & Car to be scrutinised. A single points deduction against specifications will be applied if either car fails General tolerance +/- 0.5mm & - 0.5g.
PENALTY
APPLIED
PASS/FAIL
or
POINTS
DEDUCTION
RULE
RULE OVERVIEW
DIMENSIONS
3d
OVERALL LENGTH
170 < L <210
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3e
OVERALL WIDTH
Min 60
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3f
MASS
Min 52g
BALLAST
-4
Min 2
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
-4
3g
3k
3l
4a
WIDTH AT SIDEPODS
4b
4c
VIRTUAL CARGO
4e
6e
6f
6l
FRONT AEROFOIL SPAN
6m
6n
6o
REAR AEROFOIL SPAN
6p
REAR AEROFOIL CHORD
CAR 1 CAR 2
Min 3.5
-1
Min R 1.5
-1
Min 50
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 30 x 15
Min 60 x 40 x 8
(x, y, z)
Min 15 x 15 x 26
(x, y, z)
-1
[0.10 TIME]
-2
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Balsa: Min 34
Other: Min 40
[0.10 TIME]
-2
Min 15
-2
Balsa: 3.5 < T < 12

Other: 1.5 < T < 12
-2
Balsa: Min 34
[0.10 TIME]
-2
Min 15
-2
Balsa: 3.5 < T < 12

Other: 1.5 < T < 12
-2
6q
7l
FRONT WHEELS MAX HEIGHT OF OBSTRUCTION
Max 15mm
9b
120 < l < 190
-1
9c
3.5 < D < 5
-2
[0.05 TIME]
-1
10b
CHAMBER DIAMETER
D = 19
-1
10c
DEPTH OF CHAMBER
50 < D < 60
-1
10d
CHAMBER HEIGHT
10e
Min 22
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
-2

RULE
PENALTY
APPLIED
RULE OVERVIEW
PASS/FAIL
or
CAR 1
POINTS
DEDUCTION
CAR 2
1k
MACHINING: SIDE 1 NC CODE; TOP/BOTTOM 2 NC CODES (WITH 6MM CUTTER) DISQUALIFIED
1p
ENTRY NUMBER STICKER SIZE AND VISIBILITY MAX OF 25MM L X 15MM H
-1
1q
-2
1r
-2
3a
[0.10 TIME]
-2
8|P a g e
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: DEVELOPMENT CLASS

3b
-2
3c
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3h
REA SUPPLIED SINGLE STANDARD BALSA WOOD BLANK
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3m
[0.10 TIME]
-2
4d
5a
NOSE CONE MATERIALS METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED
5b
-1
6a
-1
6b
-1
6c
-1
6d
REAR AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH REAR WHEEL- ABOVE WHEEL
-1
6g
-1
6h
FRONT AEROFOIL & SUPPORT STRUCTURE METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED
DISQUALIFIED
6k
REAR AEROFOIL MADE FROM BALSA
[0.10 TIME]
-2
7a
[0.10 TIME]
-2
7b
-2
7c
-2
7d
[0.05 TIME]
-1
7e
4 UNMODIFIED REA STANDARD WHEELS
[0.10 TIME]
-2
8a
-2
8b
4 UNMODIFIED REA AXLE GROMMETS
-2
8c
2 STANDARD/MODIFIED AXLES OF SAME DIAMETER
-2
8e
NO MODIFICATIONS TO WHEEL SUPPORT SYSTEM
-2
9a
-1
9d
-2
DISQUALIFIED
PROHIBITED
-1
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
-1
9f
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
-1
9g
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
-1
10f
FROM RACING
-1
10g
[0.10 TIME]
-2
9e


/60
1
2
3
4
Poor finish.
10
11

overall finish.
12
13
14
15
Excellent finish.
SCORE
/15
9|P a g e
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: PROFESSIONAL CLASS

For clarification on individual rules refer to the 2014/2015 Season Australian Rules & Regulations. Car 1 = Primary Race Car & Car 2 = Back-up Race Car.
Both Car 1 & Car to be scrutinised. A single points deduction against specifications will be applied if either car fails General tolerance +/- 0.5mm & - 0.5g.
PENALTY
APPLIED
PASS/FAIL
POINTS
DEDUCTION
or
RULE
RULE OVERVIEW
DIMENSIONS
3d
OVERALL LENGTH
170 < L <210
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3e
OVERALL WIDTH
Min 60
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3f
MASS
Min 52g
BALLAST
-4
Min 2
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
-4
3g
3k
3l
4a
WIDTH AT SIDEPODS
4b
4c
VIRTUAL CARGO
4e
6e
6f
6l
FRONT AEROFOIL SPAN
6m
6n
6o
REAR AEROFOIL SPAN
6p
REAR AEROFOIL CHORD
CAR 1 CAR 2
Min 3.5
-1
Min R 1.5
-1
Min 50
-1
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 30 x 15
Min 60 x 40 x 8
(x, y, z)
Min 15
(x)
[0.10 TIME]
-2
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Balsa: Min 34
Other: Min 40
[0.10 TIME]
-2
-2
Min 15
Balsa: Min 3.5
Other: Min 1.5
Balsa: Min 34
Other: Min 40
-2
-2
[0.10 TIME]
Min 15
-2
Balsa: Min 3.5

Other: Min 1.5
-2
6q
7h
FRONT WHEEL DIAMETER
Min 26
[0.10 TIME]
-2
7i
REAR WHEEL DIAMETER
Min 26
[0.10 TIME]
-2
7j
FRONT WHEEL CONTACT WIDTH
Min 15
[0.10 TIME]
-2
7k
REAR WHEEL CONTACT WIDTH
Min 15
[0.10 TIME]
-2
7l
FRONT WHEELS VISABILITY & MAX HEIGHT OF OBSTRUCTION
Max 15
[0.05 TIME]
-1
9b
9c
120 < l < 190
-1
3.5 < D < 5
-2
10b
CHAMBER DIAMETER
D = 19
-1
10c
DEPTH OF CHAMBER
50 < D < 60
-1
10d
CHAMBER HEIGHT
10e
Min 22
[0.05 TIME]
-1
Min 3.5
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
-2

RULE
PENALTY
APPLIED
RULE OVERVIEW
PASS/FAIL
POINTS
DEDUCTION
or
CAR 1
CAR 2
1k
MACHINING: SIDE 1 NC CODE; TOP/BOTTOM 2 NC CODES (WITH 6MM CUTTER) DISQUALIFIED
1p
ENTRY NUMBER STICKER SIZE AND VISIBILITY MAX OF 25MM L X 15MM H
-1
10 | P a g e
SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: PROFESSIONAL CLASS

1q
-2
1r
-2
3a
3b
3c
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3h
REA SUPPLIED SINGLE STANDARD BALSA WOOD BLANK
[0.05 TIME]
-1
3m
[0.10 TIME]
-2
4d
5a
NOSE CONE MATERIALS METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED
5b
-1
6a
-1
6b
-1
6c
-1
6d
REAR AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH REAR WHEEL- ABOVE WHEEL
-1
6g
-1
6h
FRONT AEROFOIL & SUPPORT STRUCTURE METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED
DISQUALIFIED
6i
REAR AEROFOIL & SUPPORT STRUCTURE - METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED
DISQUALIFIED
6j
REAR AEROFOIL & STRUCTURE POSITIONING IN VERTICAL PROJECTED VOLUME
7a
7b
-2
7c
-2
7d
8a
9a
[0.10 TIME]
-2
-2
-2
DISQUALIFIED
-2
[0.10 TIME]
-2
[0.05 TIME]
-1
-2
-1
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
PROHIBITED
FROM RACING
9d
9e
9f
9g
10f
10g
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
[0.10 TIME]
-2


/60
1
2
3
4
Poor finish.
10
11

overall finish.
12
13
14
15
Excellent finish.
SCORE
/15
11 | P a g e
ENGINEERING SCORE CARD

3. CAD & ANALYSIS
LOW RANGE
1
3.1 Application
3.2 Drawing &
Rendering
10
Adequate Use of CAD. Final Design Only

1
2
3
4
5
Basic drawing and rendering
3.3 Organisation
3.4 Analysis
MID RANGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Advanced use of CAD & CAM technologies throughout.
Final CAD identical to physical model produced
15
16
17
18
19
20
High detail including spec dimensions. Photorealistic render
8
9
10
11
12
13
Good technical drawing & realistic rendering
10
14
11
Satisfactory organisation of data and models
Scores
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21
Appropriate use of CAD-CAM in product development stages.
Good understanding of CAM evident
Generally disorganised
1
HIGH RANGE
Minimal analysis shown
10
11
12
13
12
13
14
15
Data & parts highly ordered & linked. Full CAD product assembly
14
Good analysis. Results applied to development of project
15
16
17
18
19
20
Variety of advanced & relevant analysis techniques adopted
/ 85
CAD & ANALYSIS TOTAL

4. MANUFACTURING
4.1 CAD/Product
Match
4.2 Use of CNC
Machining
LOW RANGE
MID RANGE
1
2
3
4
Physical design has some similarity to final
CAD design
1
2
3
4
Minimal evidence & understanding shown.

1
4.3 Documentation
in Portfolio
HIGH RANGE
7
8
9
Good Match to CAD design
7
10
11
10
11
10
11
Good use & understanding of CNC
Few manufacturing details
Some manufacturing processes & issues included
Scores
12
13
14
15
CAD & physical design identical in every detail
12
13
14
15
High level of CNC machining competence. Appropriate
complex techniques & processes used
12
13
14
15
Detailed assessment of all manufacturing stages, materials & issues
/ 45
MANUFACTURING TOTAL
5. TECHNICAL MERIT
5.1 Technical
Merit
LOW RANGE
1
MID RANGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
Basic design with little technical merit
HIGH RANGE
TECHNICAL MERIT
Developed with McLeay Consulting Pty. Ltd.
Scores
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Developed design with some technical merit
Original & clever developed design with exc. technical merit
/ 30
2014 Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd.
Page | 12
PORTFOLIO & DISPLAY SCORE CARD

6. PORTFOLIO
6.1
Project
Management
6.2
Teamwork
6.3
Clarity &
Quality
LOW RANGE
1
MID RANGE
3
4
5
Limited evidence of project
management presented.
3
Limited teamwork evident.

1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Simple management & planning used to guide progress. A
range of project resources identified.
8
10
11
12
13
14
Some evidence of effective teamwork with defined roles.
2
3
4
5
6
Not easily followed. Basic presentation
standard. Minimal ICTs used.
Scores
HIGH RANGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Clear structure & well organised. Good Use of ICTs enhancing
presentation & providing impact.
15
16
17
18
19
20
Comprehensive PM. A range of factors considered. E.g. Scope,
time, resources & project risks. Plan changes discussed.
15
16
17
18
19
20
Highly structured team with clear roles. All members had effective
& critical contributions. Role interactions recognised.
15
16
17
18
19
20
High impact. Professional throughout. Consistent & clear
organisation. Excellent use of ICTs to enhance presentation.
/ 60
PORTFOLIO TOTAL
7. MARKETING
7.1
Team Identity
7.2
Marketing
LOW RANGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
Inconsistent, limited or obscure identity
1
2
3
4
5
6
Limited evidence. Obscure or irrelevant.
8. PIT DISPLAY
8.1
Pit Display
HIGH RANGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Effective & consistent team identity in various project components.
15
16
17
18
19
20
Highly effective team identity. Brand consistently applied.
8
9
10
11
12
13
Some sponsorship & marketing activities explained.
LOW RANGE
1
14
MID RANGE
7
Scores
MID RANGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
Creative & effective marketing strategies linked to sponsor
ROI.
TEAM IDENTITY & MARKETING TOTAL
Scores
HIGH RANGE
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Simple branding displayed. Repetition of folio elements
Clear & effective brand & presentation. ICTs used effectively.
Clean & organised with high Impact. Professional. Attention to detail.
/ 40
PIT DISPLAY
9. F1 DESIGN PROCESS
9.1
Concepts
9.2
Development
9.3
Testing
9.4
Evaluation
LOW RANGE
MID RANGE
2
3
4
5
Single or basic design concept.
2
3
4
5
Limited development shown.
2
3
4
5
Little evidence of testing.
/ 40
8
9
10
11
12
13
Good multiple design concepts linked to research.
8
9
10
11
12
13
Logical design developments explained.
Scores
HIGH RANGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Several inspired design concepts with form & function linked.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Clearly justified developments based around research & testing.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Tests which are relevant & results documented
Quality test method. Accurate results linked to design revisions.
6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
7
No or little evaluation.
Ideas or process evaluations
at
different
stages.
Excellent
ongoing
evaluation
linked
to
improvement
actions
8
9
DESIGN PROCESS TOTAL
10
Developed with McLeay Consulting Pty. Ltd. 2014 Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd.
11
12
13
/ 80
Page | 13
VERBAL PRESENTATION SCORE CARD

10. TECHNIQUE
LOW RANGE
1
10.1 Teamwork
10.2 Visual Aids
MID RANGE
2
3
Minimal team participation.
2
Little use of aids.
HIGH RANGE
Scores
5
6
Good contributions from most team members.
8
9
10
Excellent team work. All members participate freely.
5
6
Some aids used effectively.
5
6
Some audience connection at times.
8
9
10
Highly professional aids that improved
communication.
8
9
10
Audience fully engaged & excited by presentation.
10.3 Connection
1
2
3
Minimal connection with audience.
10.4 Energy &

Dynamic
1
2
3
Forced dynamic and/or low energy.
5
6
7
Speakers generally enthusiastic with lively delivery.
8
9
10
Passionate with effective & appropriate levels of energy.
/ 40
TECHNIQUE TOTAL
11. COMPOSITION
LOW RANGE
1
HIGH RANGE
2
3
No Stated Objective / Agenda
5
6
Clear Objective, Basic Agenda
8
9
10
Compelling Objective / Clear Signposting
1
2
3
2
Several
concepts 1lacked explanation.
5
6
Clear & appropriate concept explanation.
8
9
10
Excellent concept explanation. Clearly understood.
1
2
3
Rushed or over time. Topics not balanced.
4
8
5
6
To Time. Balanced topic depth & pace.
8
9
10
To Time or under. Excellent topic depth.
11.1 Structure
11.2 Concept
Explanation
11.3 Timing
MID RANGE
Scores
/ 30
COMPOSITION TOTAL
12. SUBJECT MATTER
LOW RANGE
MID RANGE
Scores
HIGH RANGE
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
12.1 Innovation
Limited evidence of innovation in project.
Innovation/s described & justified but could have better project impact.
Original & truly clever innovations with high project
impact.
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
12.2 Collaboration
Limited collaboration.
Links with industry or higher education described.
Collaborations justified with links to learning & project
outcomes.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
12.3 Learning
A range of personal, life-long learning & career skills acquired &
No real reflections discussed.
Good explanation of learning outcomes.
Experiences
identified as project outcomes for a range of team members.
SUBJECT MATTER TOTAL

Developed with McLeay Consulting Pty. Ltd.
/ 150
2014 Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd..
Page | 14
JUDGING FEEDBACK FORM

PORTFOLIO& PIT DISPLAY / VERBAL PRESENTATION / ENGINEERING (please circle)
Event Name:
Team:
No:
Three (3) things you should continue to do:
1.
2.
3.
Three (3) things that would most improve your participation:
1.
2.
3.
2014 Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd..
Page | 15

ENQUIRIES
All enquiries regarding the Australian F1 in Schools Technology Challenge should be directed to:
Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd.
Mailing Address:
PO Box 136
Castle Hill
NSW 1765
In Australia call: 1300 204 478
International: +61 2 9634 2144
Facsimile: (61) 2 8079 0622
Email: contact@rea.org.au
Website: www.f1inschools.org.au
Page | 16

Marking Criteria 2014 v1.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Marking Criteria 2014 v1.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15

Version 1.0 May 2014

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15

Version 1.0 May 2014

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15

Engineering: 235 marks in total consisting of:

Portfolio & Pit Display: 220 marks in total consisting of:

Verbal Presentation: 220 marks in total consisting of:

Version 1.0 May 2014

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15

SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: CADET CLASS

1A: DIMENSIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

170 < L <210

TRACK CLEARANCE (LOWEST POINT INC. GUIDES)

BALSA COMPONENT THICKNESS

CONVEX EDGES (ZERO TOLERANCE)

SIDEPOD PROJECTED AREA

NO CAR BODY IN VOLUME 15MM REAR OF FRONT WHEEL

FRONT AEROFOIL AIR SPACE

REAR AEROFOIL AIR SPACE

FRONT AEROFOIL SPAN

FRONT AEROFOIL CHORD

FRONT AEROFOIL THICKNESS

REAR AEROFOIL SPAN

REAR AEROFOIL CHORD

REAR AEROFOIL THICKNESS

FRONT WHEELS MAX HEIGHT OF OBSTRUCTION

TETHERLINE GUIDE SEPARATION

120 < l < 190

TETHERLINE GUIDE HOLE

3.5 < D < 5

Balsa: 3.5 < T < 12

Balsa: 3.5 < T < 12

CHAMBER WALL THICKNESS TOTAL OF ALL MATERIALS

Total Dimensional Penalties

1B: REGULATION SPECIFICATIONS

3 AXIS CNC SIDE MACHINING ONLY 1 MIRRORED NC CODE, 6MM CUTTER

ENTRY NUMBER STICKER SIZE AND VISIBILITYMAX OF 25MM L X 15MM H

REAS NATIONAL SPONSORS LOGOS APPLIED (REA, DMO, F1, AUTODESK)

REA & F1 STICKERS ON OPPOSING SIDEPODS AND MIN OF 25MM L X 15MM H

Version 1.0 May 2014

F1 in Schools Australia Marking Criteria Season 2014/15

SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD: CADET CLASS

THE F1 CAR PRODUCT LEGAL ELEMENTS

CENTRE OF GRAVITY REMAINS BETWEEN AXLES WITH CANISTER INSERTED

BALSA DEFAULT MATERIAL FOR ALL NON ROTATING PARTS

IMPLANTS, FOREIGN OBJECTS OR VOIDS PROHIBITED

VIRTUAL CARGO CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN ENGINEERING DRAWINGS

FRONT AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH FRONT AXLE IN FRONT OF CENTRE LINE

FRONT AEROFOIL CONNECTION WITH NOSECONE ONLY

REAR AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH REAR AXLE BEHIND CENTRE LINE

REAR AEROFOIL POSITIONING WITH REAR WHEEL ABOVE WHEEL

AEROFOILS TOP SURFACES 100% VISIBLE FROM CAR TOP - ABOVE

ALL WHEELS AND FULL TRACK CONTACT NO CAMBER (ZERO TOLERANCE)

WHEEL DIMENSIONS CONSISTENCY ACROSS TRACK CONTACT

TRACK CONTACT SURFACE OF ALL 4 WHEELS FREELY ROTATING

4 UNMODIFIED REA STANDARD WHEELS

WHEEL SUPPORT SYSTEM PROJECTED CYLINDER VOLUME

4 UNMODIFIED REA AXLE GROMMETS

BRASS DEFAULT MATERIAL FOR AXLES - NO OTHER MATERIAL PERMITTED

NO MODIFICATIONS TO WHEEL SUPPORT SYSTEM

TETHER LINE GUIDES SECURITY & LOCATION ON CENTRE LINE

TETHER LINE GUIDES CLOSED FOR SAFETY