Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF NUMISMATICS
24
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:02:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ISSN: 1053-8356
ISBN 10: 0-89722-324-1
ISBN 13: 978-0-89722-324-9
Printed in China
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:02:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Contents
Editorial Committee v
from Israel 45
Aurel Vlcu and Emanuel Petac. The Second Syrian War and Gold Staters of
Rulers 163
Review Articles
Donald T. Ariel and Jean-Philippe Fontanille, The Coins of Herod.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:02:01 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Early Qarkhnid coins bring to light three Qarkhnid appanage rulers not
Nasr, and Irtsh) and allow us to trace their careers. Between ah 3 90-409/ ad
999-1019 they are named as as vassals or subvassals on coins struck at Ispjb,
Haftdeh, Khojende, Samarqand, Ilq, and Kharachket.
163
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
genealogy of the Qarkhnids and trace their careers. The new coins are described
as follows:
1. Haftdeh, ah 390/AD 999-1000. Fais , 27.5 mm, 3.3 g. (A. Kuznetsov coll.; pl. 35,
1).
obliterated and features mistakes and distortions. The ruler s name is er-
two circular legends involving the formula u, *4. ("from he who ordered"). The
liek (Nasr b. 4Al) is named as suzerain, with his vassal and brother Muhammad
(b). Ali, and his subvassal Irtsh (see below).
2. Samarqand, ah 402/AD 1011-1012. Fais. Weight and diameter unknown. Cf.
Kochnev 1995: 224, no. 295. 1
Obverse : Within triangle: i-xj. On its sides: tf .^1 J4/4} o tf 41 I*.
sal, Abd al-Rahman (b. Mansr). The supreme suzerain, Khn Ahmad b. Ali, is
not mentioned.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
enge is inscribed within a small circle. Within the lozenge: I^lL^. On its
pl. 35,3).
Inner circular legend within beaded circle: (sic) >1 J4/4] pjo V J I.
6. Ilq, ah 405/AD 1014-1015. Fais, 27.8 mm, 3.42 g. (R. A. Cannito coll., IS-39ib;
pl. 35, 5).
Obverse : Crescent with star between horns. Within crescent: Star below.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Reverse : Within interlaced linear circle: JWu^j/jo^j/ai. The letters ^ are placed
within a crescent.
7. Ilq, ah 406/AD 1015-1016. Fais. (R. A. Cannito coll. QK-361; pl. 35, 6).
Obverse : Central legend:
*1. In each corner of the square formed by the marginal legend there are
three dots.
Reverse : Within a border of three circles (linear, beaded, linear):
LL.
9. Ilq, ah 408/AD 1017-1018. Fais, 28.6 mm, 3.82 g. (R. A. Cannito coll., IS-459;
pl. 35, 8).
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Circular legend: ISUj, (U-gJj.?) ifc'iVi o i -o-oL l-Oj +4One may suppose that the word L^lai in the obverse central legend is an erroneous
rendering of the name Irtsh. As they were alien to Arabs and Iranians, Turkic
names and titles were written by die engravers and chroniclers in many different
ways. For example, the Turkic name and title Inl was written variously with a long
or short initial vowel: Lilj. (nl) or LJ. (Inl). In the same way, Irtsh might be
vidual engraver (Fedorov 2001: 38). Just as Tonga could be written Tongh (laJLil
with the letter ) or Tong (Ixlsll with the letter i), so could rtsh be written rtsh
(Ly-L.ljjuL with the letter !*) or rtsh (^iJul with the letter 2).
Having engraved the name rtsh with the long initial vowel L () and broad
ia. (t), instead of i (t), the engraver seems to have had no place left for the final
letter (sh). While this explanation of the peculiar legend seems plausible one
fact speaks against it. At Imlak-tepe (ancient Tunket) were found two coins with
this legend, but struck from different dies (cf. Pl. 35, 9-10). Repetition of the same
spacing error on two different dies hardly seems likely.
The Kharachket coin of ah 409 gives the full name of the ruler as Ab
Muhammad (the kunya, "Father of Muhammad") Abd al-Rahman ibn Mansr.
So this Qarkhnid was a son of the supreme ruler of the Western Qarkhnids,
coins there, and the vassal of a senior Qarkhnid who gave him this appanage.
As for rtsh (L^iai), there are two possibilities: it is either the Turkic name of Abd
al-Rahman or the name of a subvassal.
Historical Background
In October ad 999, Nasr b. Al captured Bukhr and put an end to the Smnid
state (Baihaki 1962: 566). The greater part of the conquered Smnid lands went
to Nasr, who gave some of his towns to vassals and subvassals as appanages. Ilek
Nasr died in ah 403/AD 1012-1013. The coins struck in this year suggest that his
domain, consisting of Ferghna, Khojende, Usrshana, and Soghd, was divided
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
among the other Qarkhnids. Ferghna was included in the domain of Ahmad,
which had previously included the Chu Valley with its capital, Balsghn (Quz
Ord). In the towns of Ferghna (Uzgend and Akhsiket) coins were minted in the
name of Ahmad. Other towns were either left to old appanage rulers who possessed them before ah 403, as vassals of Ahmad, given to new vassals of Ahmad,
or to vassals of his vassals (subvassals). Shsh was left to Ysuf b. Abd Allh, an
old vassal of Ahmad. Ispljb was left to another former vassal of Ahmad, Muizz
ad-Daula Mut, from the local Mutid dynasty. In Chaghniyn, a ruler from the
local Muhtadjid dynasty also recognized Ahmad as suzerain. Ahmads younger
brother, Muhammad b. All, had possessed Tarz as vassal of his elder sibling since
ah 393/AD 1002-1003. Muhammad also controlled lq, which he, as ally of Nasr,
had captured in the war of ah 401-402 between Nasr and Ahmad, and retained
after the peace was made. In ah 403, he received Usrshana, Zmin, and Khojende
as appanages. The coin evidence suggests that he had not possessed these towns
earlier. Abd al-Rahman disappears from the coins of Samarqand and is replaced
by Tongh Tegn Muhammad b. Hasan, now vassal of Ahmad. Bukhr and Kesh
minted coins in the name of Mansr b. All, father of Abd al-Rahman (Fedorov
2007:8-11).
In ah 404/ ad 1014 a war broke out. Ahmad b. Ali attacked his brother Mansr
and took Bukhr and Kesh from him. However, in the following year, a horde of
infidel nomads appeared, devastating and pillaging the eastern frontiers of Ahmas
domain. In order to protect his territories, Ahmad marched against the nomads,
thereby giving Mansr some respite. The nomads from the borders of China were
within eight days journey from Balsghn, when Ahmad advanced against them.
They began to retreat, but Ahmad pursued them for three months and completely
routed them. In his absence (about half a year), Mansr captured many towns of
Ahmad and won allies, including the fourth of the brothers, Muhammad b. All. In
1014-1015, became the supreme ruler of the Western Qarkhnid khaqanate and
reigned well into ah 415/AD 1024-1025.
Discussion
I. Ahmad son of Ilek Nasr b. All
he is cited with Irtsh only once, on coins of Ilq, in ah 404-405. Nasr b. Ali
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
he is cited with Irtsh only on coins of Haftdeh, in ah 390, and Ilq, in ah 404406. Clearly the Turkic name Irtsh cannot have belonged to any of these rulers.
Therefore Irtsh must have been a Qarkhnid vassal or subvassal.
Ahmad b. Nasr is named, in ah 389/AD 998-999, on a coin of Ispjb (Kochnev
1995: 208, no. 75). On its obverse, above and below the kalima , are cited Mut (the
Smnid generals in Safar ah 389/February ad 999 and dethroned, on 14 Dhu-1Qada ah 389/23 October ad 999, by Ilek Nasr, the conqueror of Bukhr (Bartold
1963: 327, 329). For nine months in ad 999, Mut was a vassal of the Smnids.
For the last two months of ad 999, he was a vassal of Qarkhnids: first of Ahmad
b. Nasr, then of Ahmad b. All, to whom Nasr ceded Ispjb (Fedorov 2000: 13). It
has been argued that Ahmad b. Nasr was a son of Ilek Nasr (Fedorov 1972: 142;
Kochnev 1987: 158).
Irtsh appears, in ah 390/AD 999-1000, on a coin of Haftdeh (cat. no. 1). It
names the Ilek (Nasr b. All) as suzerain, his vassal and brother Muhammad (b.)
All, and his subvassal Irtsh. Haftdeh (literally "the Seven Settlements") was situ-
ated on the easternmost outskirts of the Ferghana Valley and was conquered by
the Muslims from the infidel Turks only in the tenth century ad (Bartold 1963:
212, 317).
In ah 390/AD 999-1000, fuls of three types were minted at Khojende. The
first two types (Kochnev 1995: 210, nos. 103-104) cite the direct ruler (owner) of
Khojende, al-Muayid al- Adi Ilek Nasr b. All, as well as his suzerain and brother,
Nsir al-Haqq Khn Ab Nasr (Ahmad b. All). The fais in the British Museum
(Lane-Poole 1876: 121, no. 434) is a mule. It has the same reverse as a fais published by Kochnev (1995: 210, no. 103), which names Ahmad b. Nasr, a vassal
and son of Ilek Nasr, in a circular legend. The supreme ruler, Ahmad b. All, is not
named and Muhammad b. All appears to have been compensated with another
town, most probably Tarz.
Apart from the right to be named on coins of Khojende, Ahmad b. Nasr received a share of the taxes collected there. Subvassalship did not require him to
live in Khojende. He could live like a nomad, appearing before the town only to
demand his share of the taxes. However, when he became a full vassal, he was
required to live in Khojende in order to govern it, while his nomadic fellow tribesmen policed and defended the town.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Irtsh resurfaces again, in ah 404-406, at Ilq (cat. nos. 3-8). On coin no. 3
(ah 404) Khqn Ahmad b. All is cited as supreme suzerain, although his name
Ahmas vassal San al-Daula Inl Tegn Muhammad b. All and Irtsh are also
named. On this coin, Muhammad b. Ali bears the title Tegn, although later in
ah 404 he became Ilek, second only to the title of Khn (Fedorov 2001a: 22). As
Muhammad b. Ali possessed many other towns, the actual ruler of Ilq must have
been Irtsh, who held it as an appanage from Muhammad, citing on his coins his
suzerain (Muhammad b. All) and supreme suzerain Khqn (Ahmad b. All).
On coin no. 4 (Ilq, ah 404), the supreme suzerain Qutb al-Daula Khn
(Ahmad b. Ali), his vassal San al-Daula Inl Tegin (Muhammad b. Ali), and his
subvassal Sakh al-Daula are named.
On coin no. 5 (Ilq, ah 404), San al-Daula Ilek Muhammad b. Ali appears
as suzerain with his vassal, Irtsh. Muhammad b. Ali here bears the higher title of
Ilek and Irtsh seems to have risen from the status of subvassal to vassal. The coins
of Ilq show that the laqab Sakh al-Daula ("Generosity of the State") belonged to
Irtsh. On some of the coins of ah 404-406 Irtsh is named in the center of the
obverse, while on others of the same period Sakh al-Daula appears in the same
position. This very rare laqab , found only on coins of Ilq, disappears after ah
404-406.
Coin no. 6 (Ilq, ah 405) shows that the political situation in Ilq, in ah 405,
was the same as it had been in ah 404/ ad 1013-1014.
On coin no. 7 (Ilq, ah 406), the Khn (suzerain) and the Ilek (vassal) are
cited, but Irtsh appears as a subvassal holding Ilq as an appanage from the Ilek
(Muhammad b. Ali). During the war of ah 405-407 in the Western Qarkhnid
khaqanate there were two khns: Tongh I Khn Ahmad b. Ali and Arsln Khn I
Mansr b. Ali. Most probably this coin refers to Arsln Khn I Mansr.
Coin no. 8 (Ilq, ah 406) reflects the same political situation as coin no. 7.
After this, Irtsh disappears from the coins.
No coins of Ilq are known for ah 407/AD 1016-1017 and therefore we cannot
judge the political situation there in that year. However, in ah 408/1017-1018 new
appanage rulers appeared at Ilq. It would seem that the death of Tongh Khn I
Ahmad b. Ali, at the beginning of ah 408, led to a reshuffling of appanages and
appanage rulers.
On coin no. 9 (Ilq, ah 408), suzerain Arsln Khn I Mansr b. Ali, vassal
Husain b. Shihb al-Daula, and subvassal Bri Tegin are named. Judging by the
fact that Husain is mentioned after the formula -0-0L U, ("from he who ordered"),
he possessed Ilq and the right to mint there. Husain was vassal holding Ilq as
an appanage given him by Arsln Khn. Subvassal Bri Tegin had the right to be
cited on coins of Ilq and to get part of taxes collected there. Bri Tegin was the
title of the Qarkhnid prince, Ibrahim b. Nasr, son of Ilek Nasr. In ah 432-460/
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
and Abd al-Rahman. Tongh Khn I Ahmad b. All, the leader of the Western
Qarkhnids and brother of Nasr and Mansr is not mentioned on this Samarqand issue.
After this, Ab Muhmmad Abd al-Rahman disappears from the coins until ah
409/AD 1018-1019, when he is named as vassal of an unknown senior Qarkhnid
on coins of Kharachket. It is not entirely uncommon for the name of the suzerain
to be omitted from copper coins of the period, as they were produced only to meet
the small change needs of the issuing town and its sububurbs. Kharachket (the
archaeological site of Kanka) is about 8 km south of the Angren River, near its
confluence with the Syr Darya.
In ancient and early medieval times, the valleys of the Angren and Chirchik
(a tributary of the Syr Daria, north of the Angren River) rivers comprised the
Chch realm, now Tashkentskaia oblas in Uzbekistan. Iu. Buriakov localized the
Yuni kingdom in Chch, which, according to the Han chronicle (206 bc-ad 252)
was a vassal of the Kangui nomad state. He established its location by citing the
description of Chch in the Tang Chronicle (ad 618-906): "ruler Shi resides in
Chjesi. This place belonged (in ancient times) to the town Yuni of the Small Kangui ruler" (Bichurin 1950: 313). Proceeding from the fact that the other towns
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
of Chch sprang up later than Kanka, which has archaeological strata dated to
the third-second century bc, Buriakov (1975: 32-35) identified Yuni with Kanka.
After the Arab conquest of Central Asia, ancient Chch split into two provinces:
Shsh (Chirchik Valley), with its capital at Binket, and Ilq (Angren Valley), with
its capital at Tunket. It is not clear whether Yuni/Chjesi became known as Karachket before or after the Arab conquest. However, Arab and Persian geographers of
the tenth-eleventh century ad certainly used the name Karachket or Kharashket.
Kharachket was the largest town of Shsh-Ilq (covering about 200 hectares), second in importance only to Binket, but its mint was insignificant, working only
sporadically and for short periods. The coins of Kharachket are rare.
III. Genealogy
Previously, only three sons (Husain, Ahmad, Ysuf) were known to Arsln Khn
I Mansr b. 'All, who appeared for the first time in Usrshana, in ah 400/ ad
1009-1010, as a vassal of Ilek Nasr (Fedorov 2001a: 23, table 3; Cannito and Fedorov 2008: 573). We can now add a fourth son of Mansr, Abd al-Rahman. to the
Qarkhnid genealogy.
The full stemma of the dynasty, as it is presently known, appears below:
Arsln Khn AlI, Ruler of Kashghr
(fell in war with infidel nomads in early ah 3 88/ ad 998)
III
Muhammad6
423?).
5 Named on coins in 402-409/1011-1019 in Samarqand and Kharachket.
6 Judging by his kunya, Ab Muhammad Abd al-Rahman had a son, Muhammad.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
List of Illustrations
Plate 35. Qarkhnid fuls of ah 390-409.
1.Haftdeh, ah 390/ ad 999-1000. (A. Kuznetsov coll.).
2.11q, ah 404/ ad 1013-1014. (R. Cannito coll., IS-1631).
3.11q, ah 404/AD 1013-1014. (R. Cannito coll., IS-362).
4.11q, ah 404/AD 1013-1014. (R. Cannito coll., IS-390).
5.11q, ah 405/AD 1014-1015. (R. Cannito coll, IS-391I5).
6.11q, ah 406/AD 1015-1016. (R. Cannito coll.).
7.11q, ah 406/AD 1015-1016. (R. Cannito coll., IS-650).
8.11q, ah 408/AD 1017-1018. (R. Cannito coll., IS-459).
9-10. Kharachket, ah 409/AD 1018-1019. (A. Kuznetsov coll.).
References
Ashirov, S. A. and A. V. Kuznetsov. 2009. Klady i kladoiskateli. Tashkent: Fan.
Baihaki, Ab-1-Fazl. 1962. Istoriia Masuda 1030-1041. A. K. Arendsa, trans. Tashkent: Izd-vo Akademi nauk Uzbeksko SSR.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
38-44.
Lane-Poole, S. 1876. Catalogue of Oriental coins in the British Museum. Vol. 2. London: British Museum.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Plate 35
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Plate 36
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:03:17 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms