Professional Documents
Culture Documents
III
errOr COrreCI:iO11
by Andrew
strength.
Earth pressure in that rubble of clay blocks satisfies a calculation
based on critical state friction because the effective pressure that acts
between blocks, and the strength with which they adhere to each other,
increases with depth in the rubble; (however, note that care is needed to
detect old slip planes where ground in the past had very large
displacements; a field shear box
Dais
There is no "true"
cohesion on the dry
cs
Cohesion
Taylor
Terzaghi
Rgure
1:Peak srengths
cs
i/o'eak
strength
(jj)
dy/dx
Ixl
n
V
ll + dyldx
dy/
30
1998
p~
Future corregtl0ion of
the Mohr Coulomb
error will invigorate
ER
0.30
0,20
Water
content
100
geotechnical
teaching, research,
and laboratory
testing.
Tension cracks
Bank before
Feet
-40
50
from
soft zone
(mm)
-30
Slip
zone
Distance
-20
Retaining
50
s ction x (friction
astic
. it remains
Slip zone
i'i.
Uncovered
'
ma e
at constant vo
e auseitisa taconstan eff
ss and critical sta e r
'r'efafnfng
'n
3:Neth
ng walls fagnra
Londonrefafn
'alysis
v
eo
ee
state line w
where
Av'
nt is
po
d rupture
roun d
o
unstable.
at represen
tates inevi
'
s
.
strength
specimens a
have an in
e dry si de of cr t
in the Mohr
cattered
strength
t"
Co 1o
k.
S
in an office usin
model, ar
g'oh
ca
wall
11
'
rial
worked so
behaviour than
ant
-0
ilure of retain'
An example of ion g term faiu
Observations o
of wa
water content
one
of a slip zon
analyses
yo f sooffl o
p
ritical stat
CSSM
slip planes
I Soil samples
100
wall
d by
an
giv
effective
P'+P c~l
is called the wet side;
empress to
ki g and emit
acking
le
o
t ' spe im
ae
the left of the critical state
where
line, w
p c~t
swe
aggregates s to
g causes ag
k in water an d
ground slips at pe ak str gth
X=0.16, x=
M=0.89, hence p, -, =
=140.78kN m,
an c
Um Itlng
Two
stress and FE
n of
define eac ag
equa i
plane
'brium
articles.
ar
Each
aggr,
ect to shear
do'/
dx+dz/dy=0
'lar
hr
if combined
wi
Cou 1om b equation
pressure p'
cs
en
s o
ed
critical
at whic h it
Pl
t on
Diy side
e. Frictional flow o
e A five
thodo
g
ghi criticises
b solutions for
strains, but tli
re p
Wet side
cri
Drain
test p
has equation
lies in h
ohesion; the
in the equations
lve strain
calculations exist
'oints
',
all
Vx
five
(q,p,
d undrained
triaxi
s
tes
a laboratory tes
AUGUST
GROUND ENG INEERING A
1998
p'1
p'crit
In
PAPER
p'dv+qdk=MP dk bene
= Mp (M = 0.888)
cu
An
equation is
calculated
below for a
yield locus,
Figure B,
that
defines the
resistance
of soil to
some
applied
stress (q,p')
60
(dvk dk)
40
20
60
40
80
p (Ib/ink)
p'c
This curve
has an
int
orange tangent at thee poin
wheret h es tress vector reaches
and
it. When the soil yields an
hardens under a stress
increment (dq,dp') directed
outward from the locus, the
eld stress (q,p') is
assoc iated" with the plastic
strain rates (dv,dk) o
yielding.
The plastic strain rate
vector (associated flow)
is normal to the tangent. To
ensure stability, outward
increment vectors
stress
t
inc
e
from
must not release energy
ductile stable soil on the wet
side of the cs line. The
equation
(dp'dv +dqdk)>0, gives
p'L
Undrained
Wet
side
cs
RteHT- Rgtnu
s(de
D: Ilntttutntnt
test tutttt.
In p'
(q/p'+dv/dk) =M .
'l
v=(constant)
(q/Mp') =1-ln(p'/p,').
Correc5on
c5 of the Mohr Coulomb enw
'on of the Mo
M hrr Coulomb
error
=v-tdnp'hich
is an inclined line in
Figure D. At points along this
test path there is an
dl bo
ric
small roug
ro erties that can e e
with critical state prop
an unstable
'1
2.2m
'ersectionwitheac
h yi eld
in
er
locus as the specimen yi'elds
and hardens.
The fact that data pointsts fit
the prediction for the
undrained test path Figure C
(given
( 'ven in detail in CSSM)
th re was no cohesion
s
on the wet side of critical state,
hence no cohesion on the dry
side either.
til
w',
1S
test path
VK
=0.
geo e
20
when
q/p'<M.
(dq/dp'+dv/dk)
80
manner, ,
t bl
0iq
em'reate
Rgure
32
4: A drum centrltuga
GROUND ENGINEERING
AUGUST
1998