Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesley McCoy
Paige Pickens
Thomas Ham
Victor Badillo
Sepeedeh R-Panah
Program Requirements
Project Challenges
Cost
Importance of Building
Design Concept
100 stories above the ground
343.7 meter / 1128 feet tall
Design Concept
floor plans,
floor heights,
and steel usage ($15 mil)
Precedents
Plaza at DeWitt
Location: Chicago
Architect: SOM
Engineer: SOM
Start of Construction: 1963
Completion: 1965
Height: 373ft
Number of Floors: 43
Material: Concrete
Tall Buildings
Tubed Structures
Advancement
Foundation
Soil Conditions
Steel tubes used to retain soil and water as caisson holes excavated
As concrete was poured, the tubes were removed for re-use
Some concrete was pulled up with the steel, leaving voids that was
filled with water or soil
Settling during construction caused all caissons to be tested and 26
received corrective work
Lateral Loads
Wind load:
Seismic Load:
Load Resistance
Trussed tube system handles the lateral loads on
the exterior of the building
Efficient because the diagonal bracing redistributes
lateral loads evenly to the exterior columns
Load Resistance
Figure illustrates how a hypothetical
load is redistributed as it goes down
the structure where ultimately each
column ends up carrying a similar
load
Lateral loads and vertical loads are
integrated by the diagonal crossbracing
Spandrel beams are also helpful in
redistributing lateral and gravity
loads to the columns
Load resistance
Connection Details
ASTM A441
Connection Details
Moment Diagram
Deflection Diagram
Building members analyzed when wind loads twice the size of the Chicago
building code recommendation were applied to the structure
Checked the Gravity Loads at the same time to make sure the members would
not yield or buckle
Khan tested eight subjects to see how they were affected by differing levels of
motion
Used 2 accelerometers to move the floor and found at which point the subjects
could feel the motion
Khans research gave the owner and designers confidence in the future
performance of the building
Conclusions
The
Reference
1.
2.
Sev, Aysin. Conuncil on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (2007): 27-31.Web.
3.
Khan, Falzur. The Trussed Tube John Hancock Center. Civil Engineering Practice 19.2 (2004): 7-28.Web.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Reflections on the Hancock Concept. Hal Iyengar. CTBUH Journal Issue 1, 2000. P51
9.
Journal Title: Civil engineering practice,Volume: 19, Issue: 2,MonthNear: 2004,Pages: 7-28,Article Author: Khan,
Article Title: The trussed tube John Hancock center
10.
"SAN FRANCISCO | Transbay Transit Center Redevelopment Plan - SkyscraperPage Forum." SkyscraperPage
Forum RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
<http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=136300&page=5>.
11.
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. John Hancock Center Exterior . 1969. ARTstor Slide Gallery, University of California,
San Diego, Chicago, Illinois. ARTstor.Web. 24 Nov. 2013.
11.
12.
Fazlur Khan (1929-1982): Reflections on his life and works; Mufti, Aftab A;Bakht, Baidar; Canadian Journal of
Civil Engineering;Apr 2002; 29, 2; ProQues; pg. 238
13.
Ali, Mir M.. "The Tower of Strength." Art of the skyscraper: the genius of Fazlur Khan. New York: Rizzoli, 2001.
106-121. Print.
14.
Bora,V.A.. John Hancock Center. 2011. John Hancock Center, Chicago, Illinois. City Profile. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.
15.
Hursley,Timothy . The John Hancock Center. N.d. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP, Chicago, Illinois . Plataforma
Arquitectura.Web. 24 Nov. 2013.
16.
K&S PhotoGraphics. Fazlur Khan and Bruce Graham with a model of the John Hancock Center. N.d. Skidmore,
Owings & Merrill LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Lehigh University Fazlur R. Khan Distinguished Lecture Series.Web. 13
Nov. 1924.
17.
Stoller, Ezra.The John Hancock Center. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000. Print.
18.
19.
http://khan.princeton.edu/khanHancock.html