Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neonatology 2014;105:290296
DOI: 10.1159/000358267
Department of Paediatrics and b Division of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of
Hong Kong, and c Department of Pharmacy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
Abstract
Background: Infants receiving prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN) are at risk of PN-associated cholestasis (PNAC). This
can progress to hepatic failure and death if PN cannot be
discontinued. Fish oil-based parenteral lipid preparation
(FOLP) has been shown to be beneficial in case studies. Objectives: (1) To evaluate whether FOLP could halt or reverse
the progression of PNAC compared with soy-based parenteral lipid preparation (SLP) and (2) to assess the effects of
FOLP on liver function and physical growth. Methods:
Design: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Setting:
level III neonatal intensive care unit. Participants: infants
with PNAC (plasma-conjugated bilirubin concentration
34 mol/l or 2 mg/dl) expected to be PN-dependent for
>2weeks. Intervention: to receive either FOLP or SLP at 1.5
g/kg/day. Primary outcome measure: reversal of PNAC within 4 months after commencement of lipid treatment; secondary outcomes: rate of change of weekly liver function
tests, infant growth parameters, blood lipid profile and episodes of late-onset sepsis. Results: A total of 9 infants were
Introduction
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
Key Words
Fish oil-based lipid preparation Newborn infants
Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis Randomised
controlled trial
Subjects
All infants who required PN underwent routine weekly monitoring of liver function, including CBil and ALT. Infants who developed PNAC were eligible for recruitment into the study if they
Clinical Data
Anthropometric parameters were serially documented. Head circumference was measured weekly. Body weight was measured on the
same electronic scale 3 times per week. Other important clinical parameters, in particular sepsis episodes, were meticulously recorded.
Neonatology 2014;105:290296
DOI: 10.1159/000358267
291
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
,QIDQWVZLWKSODVPD&%LO!PROOQ
Enrollment
,QIDQWVPHHWLQJLQFOXVLRQFULWHULDQ
'HFOLQHGWRSDUWLFLSDWHQ
3DUHQWVSHUFHLYHG31$&WREHPLOGQ
3DUHQWVUHTXHVWHG)2/3Q
1RUHDVRQJLYHQQ
'LHGEHIRUHUHFUXLWPHQWQ
5DQGRPLVHGQ
Allocation
Allocated to intervention (n = 9)
5HFHLYHG)2/3Q
'LGQRWUHFHLYHDOORFDWHGLQWHUYHQWLRQQ
Allocated to intervention (n = 7)
5HFHLYHG6/3Q
'LGQRWUHFHLYHDOORFDWHGLQWHUYHQWLRQQ
Follow-up
/RVWWRIROORZXSQ
'LVFRQWLQXHGLQWHUYHQWLRQQ
/RVWWRIROORZXSQ
'LVFRQWLQXHGLQWHUYHQWLRQGHDWKQ
Analysis
$QDO\VHGQ
([FOXGHGIURPDQDO\VLVQ
$QDO\VHGQ
([FOXGHGIURPDQDO\VLVQ
292
Neonatology 2014;105:290296
DOI: 10.1159/000358267
Results
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
Statistical Analysis
Fishers exact test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon rank
sum test were used to compare proportions and continuous variables between the FOLP and SLP groups where appropriate.
Longitudinal data, including serial liver function tests and growth
parameters, were subjected to linear mixed-effects modelling to assess the average rate of change during the treatment period (online
suppl. appendix 3). Partial correlation was used to assess the association between the proportion of enteral nutrition and ALT or
CBil while removing the effects of confounding variables (i.e. repeated measurements from each case, weeks of follow-up, sex, gestational age, postnatal age and birth weight). All tests were performed with SPSS for Windows (version 17; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.,
USA). The level of significance was set at 5% (2-tailed) for all comparisons. All results were analysed on an intention to treat basis.
Number of patients
Sex (female), n
Gestation, weeks
Birth weight, kg
Inborn, n
1st min Apgar score
5th min Apgar score
Age of development of PNAC, days
Age of recruitment, days
Baseline CBil, mol/l
Baseline ALT, IU/l
Diagnosis leading to prolonged PN, n
NEC
SGIDP
SBS
Minimisation criteria for randomisation, n
Aetiology
Non-inflammatory
Inflammatory
Birth weight
<1,000 g
1,000 g
Use of parenteral lipid prior to recruitment
<3 weeks
3 weeks
FOLP group
SLP group
p value
9
3 (33%)
29 (2834)
1,410 (7702,665)
7 (78%)
7 (3, 8)
8 (7, 9)
38 (2347)
48 (2755)
86 (42163)
29 (2531)
7
3 (43%)
29 (2637)
1,240 (8702,180)
4 (57%)
8 (38)
8 (79)
32 (1158)
41 (3165)
92 (72143)
12 (1280)
0.71
0.96
0.79
0.39
0.91
0.87
0.67
0.92
0.61
0.58
2 (22%)
2 (22%)
5 (56%)
4 (57%)
2 (29%)
1 (14%)
5 (56%)
4 (44%)
3 (43%)
4 (57%)
3 (33%)
6 (67%)
3 (43%)
4 (57%)
3 (33%)
6 (67%)
2 (29%)
5 (71%)
0.27
0.84
0.17
Data are presented as medians (with IQR in parentheses) unless otherwise indicated. NEC= Necrotising enterocolitis; SGIDP= severe gastrointestinal dysmotility of prematurity; SBS= short bowel syndrome.
293
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
Number of patients
Rate of increase
CBil, mol/l per week
ALT, IU/l per week
CBil, mol/l per 10% enteral nutritiona
ALT, IU/l per 10% enteral nutritiona
Enteral nutrition, %/week
Weight, g/week
Head circumference, cm/week
Duration of study lipid preparation, days
Age PNAC resolved, days
Sepsis episodes during study period, n
Haemoglobin, g/dl
White cell count
Platelet
Total cholesterol
HDL
LDL
Triglycerides
Deaths before discharge, n
FOLP group
9
0.6 (9.5 to 10.8)
1.1 (5.2 to 7.5)
8.5 (14.6 to 2.3)
3.0 (8.1 to 2.1)
8.8 (2.215.5)
128 (103153)
0.49 (0.370.61)
40 (1890)
110 (82158)
2 (24)
11.0 (10.111.3)
10.7 (8.911.5)
185 (144246)
3.2 (2.94.0)
0.5 (0.50.6)
2.0 (1.92.6)
1.4 (1.31.8)
0 (0%)
SLP group
p values
7
13.5 (5.421.6)
9.1 (4.114.1)
1.6 (6.2 to 5.8)
9.0 (3.314.6)
8.5 (0.816.1)
83 (57110)
0.33 (0.210.46)
74 (2382)
137 (106150)
2 (13)
10.04 (9.2010.80)
12.4 (10.214.1)
179 (118231)
4.3 (3.64.9)
0.6 (0.60.9)
2.8 (2.43.5)
1.8 (1.52.2)
2 (29%)
0.03
0.02
0.05
<0.01
0.92
0.02
0.06
0.75
0.74
0.55
0.11
0.13
0.37
0.27
0.49
0.27
0.17
0.10
Data are presented as medians (with IQR in parentheses) unless otherwise indicated. Rates of increase are
presented as coefficient (with 95% CI in parentheses).
HDL= High-density lipoprotein; LDL= low-density lipoprotein.
aAdjusted for baseline change of the parameter per week.
294
Neonatology 2014;105:290296
DOI: 10.1159/000358267
by partial correlation analysis. In the FOLP group, increasing proportion of enteral nutrition was significantly
associated with decreasing CBil (r= 0.31, p= 0.02) but
not ALT levels (r= 0.03, p= 0.81). In the SLP group, increasing enteral nutrition was not significantly associated
with any change in CBil (r= 0.05, p= 0.75) but was adversely associated with an increase in ALT (r= 0.47, p=
0.01).
Body Weight and Head Circumference
Body weight increased significantly faster in infants on
FOLP compared with SLP (128 vs. 83 g/week, respectively, p= 0.02). A positive trend was also observed for increase in head circumference (0.49 vs. 0.33 cm/week, respectively, p= 0.06; table2).
Discussion
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
model for explanation of the change of CBil were as follows: (1) baseline change of parameter with time (per
week), (2) choice of lipid preparation and (3) proportion
of enteral feeding. This same set of factors was retained in
the ALT model. After adjusting for baseline changes of
the parameter, increase in enteral nutrition was associated with significant improvement of PNAC in infants
receiving FOLP, with the CBil decreasing by 8.5 mol/l
per 10% increase in enteral nutrition (p< 0.01). In contrast, infants receiving SLP had no such improvement
(decreasing by 1.6 mol/l per 10% increase in enteral nutrition, p= 0.96). In the SLP group, ALT increased by 9.0
IU/l per 10% increase in enteral nutrition (p< 0.01). This
phenomenon, however, was not observed with FOLP
treatment and enteral nutrition (decreasing by 3.0 IU/l
per 10% increase in enteral nutrition, p= 0.24). These results demonstrate that the difference in changes of rate of
improvement of PNAC is dependent on both the choice
of parenteral lipid and the proportion of enteral nutrition. In order to test the robustness of these results, we
also performed partial correlation analysis to assess
whether the same results could be obtained by an alternative statistical technique. The same trends were revealed
Neonatology 2014;105:290296
DOI: 10.1159/000358267
SLP group
FOLP group
600
500
400
SLP, mean
(slope = 13.5)
300
200
FOLP, mean
(slope = 0.6)
100
0
10
15
20
Time after recruitment (weeks)
25
295
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
700
rations were much greater than anticipated. It also indicated that, despite gradually increasing enteral nutrition,
those on SLP would not improve at all. Thus, it should be
expected that none of these patients would improve while
receiving SLP. In addition, the magnitude of effects demonstrated in our study is consistent with results of prior
literature and understanding and, importantly, our findings were both statistically and clinically significant. As
more information on FOLP became publically available
since the start of our trial [6, 8, 9], parents in the latter
quarter of the study requested their infants be commenced on FOLP and were unwilling to consent for randomisation. In light of the interim results, and the increasing difficulty in recruitment, we decided to terminate the study and to publish the study results.
Conclusions
This is the first randomised controlled trial to demonstrate that replacement of SLP with FOLP can halt PNAC
progression. The primary outcome of PNAC at 4 months
was not different between groups. However, there was a
significant difference in the rates of change of CBil and
liver function between groups. Gradual improvement in
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by The Chinese University of Hong
Kong Direct Grant for Research (project codes: 2041480 and
2041528) and a donation from the charity organization Providence Foundation Limited (project code: 6901814). The role of the
funders was purely to provide financial support; funders were not
involved in study design, data analysis or interpretation.
Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicting financial or competing interests to declare.
References
296
Neonatology 2014;105:290296
DOI: 10.1159/000358267
Lam/Tam/Poon/Cheung/Yu/Chan/Lee/
Lee/Ng
Downloaded by:
Seluk Universitesi
193.255.248.150 - 2/3/2015 12:11:50 AM
1 Wessel JJ, Kocoshis SA: Nutritional management of infants with short bowel syndrome.
Semin Perinatol 2007;31:104111.
2 Ng PC, Lee CH, Wong SP, Lam HS, Liu
FY,So KW, et al: High-dose oral erythromycin decreased the incidence of parenteral
nutrition-associated cholestasis in preterm
infants. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 1726
1739.
3 Wales PW, de SN, Kim JH, Lecce L, Sandhu
A, Moore AM: Neonatal short bowel syndrome: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:
755762.
4 Clayton PT, Whitfield P, Iyer K: The role of
phytosterols in the pathogenesis of liver complications of pediatric parenteral nutrition.
Nutrition 1998;14:158164.
5 Colomb V, Jobert-Giraud A, Lacaille F, Goulet O, Fournet JC, Ricour C: Role of lipid
emulsions in cholestasis associated with
long-term parenteral nutrition in children.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2000; 24: 345
350.