Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH ARTICLE ON
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF
TEXTTILE COMPANI IN INDIA
SUBMITTED TO
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION
GANESHKHIND.PUNE 411007
FILE.NO.23-2881/11(WOR)
Submitted date:25/12/2013
SUBMITTED BY
DR. DILIP B. JOSHI
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
SMT. PNR SHAH MAHILA ARTS & COMMERCE COLLEGE
PALITANA-364270
GUJARAT
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
RESEARCH METHODOLLOGY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
India has widest range of variety of textiles and is rich with traditional workers but
still
India is relatively small growing player in global market.
Recession adversely affected in Indian textile co. in 1980-1998 which had adverse
effect on output and capital.
proportion of 1:1. This company received government's approval to further expand the
spinning capacity in 1982.
[vii] Oswal Spinning and Weaving Mills
Incorporated under the name- Oswal Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. on 19 th
September,1955 Registrar of Companies - Punjab at Jalandhar The name of the company
changed to - Oswal Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. After change the name of company
certified on - 26th February 1965. The main objective of the company- to manufacture of
textile, anaspati, Ghee and Alloy Steel Casting.Originally the company commenced its
business with the manufacture of wollen and worsted yarn. promoted by - Mr. Dharam Paul
Oswal and M. Raj Paul Oswal under the able guidence of late Mr. Lachman Dass Oswal.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The subject of the present study is Performance Analysis of Textile Companies in India. In this
chapter introduction and importance of textile industry in given. The study covers analytical
study of financial performance of 7 leading units of textile industry. The financial study and
analysis is important for knowing the efficiency, liquidity and for other aspects of financial
performance and so does the researcher. As textile sector is one of the biggest in India its
financial aspects also affect stake holders like share holders, investors , bank etc. the researcher
feels that its financial performance is necessary. Other related issues have been discussed
herewith. Universe of the study of major textile sector.
The researcher is not able to take the exact data of 10 years but has only able to present 8
years data.
The major textile industries includes;
[i] Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd
[ii] Digjam Ltd
[iii] Oswal Spinning and Wvg Mills Ltd
[iv] Shri Dinesh Mills Ltd
[v] Welspun India Ltd
[vi] S. Kumar National wide Ltd
[vii] Mafatlal Industries Ltd
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The main objectives of the study can be listed as follows ;
- To examine position of textile industry
- To assess the financial strength
- To examine liquidity position
- To measure financial efficiency
- To analyse the activity of the firm
- To suggest ways and means to improve performance
HYPOTHESIS
[1] ANNOVA useful for inter unit comparison
[2] NULL HYPOTHESIS there will be no any significant difference among the activity,
profitability , capital structure and working capital ratios of the selected textile units come from
identical populations. The acceptance of null hypothesis would suggest that there is no
significant difference between productivity ratios of the units came from identical population in
such textile units as the comparison. Performance analysis of textile companies in India of the
above companies covered in the study will be fully examined. The conclusion drawn and
suggestions attempted will fully examined. The conclusion drawn and suggestions will be
provide practical guidance to the management of the companies to promote for improvement
of financial performance of their companies as well as consumers, investors, financial managers
and worker for taking decisions related to their own regard of interest.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
There are approximately 1200 medium to large scale textile mills in India. 20% of these mills are
located in Coimbatore-Tamilnadu has 34 million cotton textile spindles for manufacturing cotton
yarn. Cotton yarn accounts 70 % of Indias textile exports of Indian textile exports almost 80 %
comes from coaser yarns. Consequently there is a need to upgrade the technology.
PERIOD OF THE STUDY from 2002 to 2011.
DATA COLLECTION
For the purpose of financial performance of Indian textile industry, the secondary data will be
used. It is not gathered specially to meet the needs of the problem at hand. For the study, data
will be collected for the period of 2002 2011 of the accounting year from published annual
reports of their registered offices or stock exchanges by visiting personally or by post. The figure
contained in the annual reports and accounts will be rounded off to crores upto 2 decimal
places. All the collected data will be presented and formulated in the form of condensed
balance sheet and income statement. All the ratios and mentioned statement will be analysed
and interpreted.
TOOLS FOR ANALYSIS
[1] Ratio Analysis
[2] Trend analysis
[3]Statistical Analysis chi square test, arithmetic mean, standard deviation , coefficient of
variation.
Also the Activities such as Inventory Turnover ratio, Debtors Turnover ratio, Asset Turnover
ratio and Average Raw Material Holding are considered for the statistical analysis. Mean,
Standard deviation and coefficient of variation (C.V.) are computed for all the above
mentioned categories and are listed in table 1.1.1 to table 1.3.4.
Also Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is carried out to study the difference between the various
companies for above mentioned categories. ANOVA are described by means of tables 2.1 to
2.3
Along with the above mentioned conclusions and findings the researcher has represented
his opinion through individual suggestions to the concerned companies.
The suggestions given by the researcher can be listed as under;
[1] Shri Dinesh mill ltd must maintain its highest comparative gross profit margin
and Mafatlal has to seriously concentrate on its lowest margin.
[2] Siyaram silk mill has to maintain its consistency in gross profit margin for
long term
[3] There is a significant difference between gross profit margin of different
companies
[4] There is no significant difference between net profit margin of the companies
for S Kumar ltd it is matter of serious consideration
[5] Digjam having lowest return of capital which an alarming situation of the
company
[6] Dinesh mills should continue its consistency on the return on net worth.
[7] Oswal has to take serious steps as their EPS is the lowest among all.
[8] Mafatlal has to have more accurate financial concern as their current and quick
ratio is the lowest of all.
[9] Smallest value of standard deviation indicates greater consistency in number
of days of working capital for majority of the companies.
[10] Other companies must observe Oswal Ltd to maintain consistency in interest
cover ratio.
[11] All the companies have high difference in inventory cover ratio that is positive
signal but it must maintain consistency and this may affect debtor turnover
ratio also.
[12] Asset turnover and average raw material ratios are highly different which
indicates that all the companies need to undergo process of strategic activity
analysis
Sum of Squares
Df
Mean Square
Sig.
6573.230
1095.538
6.177
.000
11173.388
63
177.355
17746.618
69
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Hypothesis: Profitability ratios H01: There is no significant difference in between Gross profit
margin (%) of different companies
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
3769.251
628.208
2.041
.073
19388.155
63
307.748
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
23157.405
69
Hypothesis: H02: There is no significant difference in between Net profit margin of different
companies
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
4167.486
694.581
.243
.960
180279.437
63
2861.578
184446.922
69
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
54926.281
9154.380
1.483
.198
388828.788
63
6171.886
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
443755.069
69
Hypothesis: H04: There is no significant difference between Return on Net Worth of different
companies
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
51334.145
8555.691
.743
.617
724992.529
63
11507.818
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
776326.674
69
Hypothesis H05: There is no significant difference between Earning Per Share of different
Companies
Source:- All company annual report 2002 to 2011 .
ANOVA
Current ratio
Between
9.627
6
1.605
7.486
.000
Groups
Within
13.503
63
.214
Groups
Total
23.130
69
Hypothesis : H06: There is no significant difference between Current ratio of different companies
ANOVA
Sum of
Mean
Squares
df
Square
F
Sig.
Quick_ratio
Between
117.496
6
19.583
57.331 .000
Groups
Within
21.519
63
.342
Groups
Total
139.015
69
Hypothesis: H07: There is no significant difference between Quick ratios of different companies
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean
Square
F
Between
426.794
6
71.132
7.697
Groups
Within
582.249
63
9.242
Groups
Total
1009.044
69
Hypothesis : H08: There is no significant difference between Long term Debt Equity ratios of
different companies
Long_term_Debt_Equity_ratio
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares
Between
2538419.795
Groups
Within
748252.284
Groups
Total
3286672.079
Sig.
.000
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
423069.966
35.621
.000
63
11877.020
69
Hypothesis : H09: There is no significant difference between Number of Days in Working capital of
different companies
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares
Mean
Square
F
Between
403.468
6
67.245
1.629
Groups
Within
2600.329
63
41.275
Groups
Total
3003.797
69
Hypothesis : H010: There is no significant difference between Interest cover ratios of different
companies
Interest cover ratio
df
Sig.
.154
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
ANOVA
511.431
85.238
948.256
63
15.052
1459.686
69
5.663
.000
Hypothesis : H011: There is no significant difference between Inventory Turnover ratios of different
companies
ANOVA
Sum of
Mean
Squares
df
Square
F
Sig.
Debtors Turnover ratio
Between
847.005
6
141.167
41.620
.000
Groups
Within
213.684
63
3.392
Groups
Total
1060.689
69
Hypothesis : H012: There is no significant difference between Debtors Turnover ratio of different
companies
ANOVA
Sum of
Mean
Squares
df
Square
F
Sig.
Asset Turnover ratio
Between
12.797
6
2.133
16.882
.000
Groups
Within
7.959
63
.126
Groups
Total
20.756
69
Hypothesis : H013: There is no significant difference between Asset Turnover ratio of different
companies
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares
Mean
Square
F
Sig.
Between
62703.810
6
10450.635
32.247
.000
Groups
Within
20417.341
63
324.085
Groups
Total
83121.151
69
Hypothesis : H014: There is no significant difference between Average Raw material Holding of
different companies
Average Row material Holding
df
DATA BASE
_ CAPITAL LENE 2000
_ CMIE PROWESS
WEBSITES
_ WWW.INDIAN FOLONE.COM.
_ WWW.CAPITAL MARKET. COM
_ WWW.BISNET .COM
_ WWW.INDIA TEA.ORG.
_ WWW.TEAUTION.COM
_ WWW.VALUENOTES.BIZ/RESEARCH /TEATOC.ASP
_ WWW.ECONOMYWATCH .COM
_ WWW.SCIENCEDIRECT.COM
_ WWW.ONLINELIBRARY.COM
_ WWW.JOURNALS.CAMBRIGE.ORG
NEWS PAPERS:
_ The Economic Times