Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VERSION 2
VERSION 2
National Standards
for Quality Online
Teaching
October 2011
888.95.NACOL (888.956.2265)
703.752.6216 fax 703.752.6201
email info@inacol.org web www.inacol.org
mail 1934 Old Gallows Road, Suite 350 Vienna, VA 22182-4040
TOLL-FREE
DIRECT
Acknowledgements
iNACOL organized a committee of experts with various backgrounds in the field of K-12 online
learning to take the lead in refreshing the iNACOL National Standards for Quality Online Courses,
Version 2. They are representatives from educational organizations that share an interest in online
education and believe that it is important that students have access to the highest quality online
teachers.
With their experience and the expertise of the original National Standards for Quality Online
Teaching, Barbara Treacy from the Education Development Center (EDC) and Sara Baltunis and
Connie Swiderski from the Texas Virtual School Network (TxVSN) chaired this project. iNACOL
would like to thank them for their leadership, as well as the involvement of these experienced and
knowledgeable leaders in the field of K-12 online learning:
Holly Atwell Connections Academy
VERSION 2
Introduction
The mission of the International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) is to ensure all
students have access to a world-class education and quality online learning opportunities that
prepare them for a lifetime of success. National Standards for Quality Online Teaching is designed to
provide states, districts, online programs, and other organizations with a set of quality guidelines for
online teaching.
The original initiative in Version 1 of the standards began with a thorough literature review of the
existing online teaching quality standards, then conducted a cross-reference of standards, followed
by a survey completed by representatives of the iNACOL network to ensure the efficacy of the
standards adopted. As a result of the research review, iNACOL chose to fully endorse the work of
the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) Standards for Quality Online Teaching and Online
Teaching Evaluation for State Virtual Schools as a comprehensive set of criteria. The standards
as identified by SREB were already in use by sixteen SREB states; they proved to be the most
comprehensive among those reviewed and included guidelines set forth in the other criteria from
the literature review.
iNACOL organized a team of experts consisting of online teachers, professional developers,
instructional designers, researchers, course developers, and administrators to review these new
standards and the new literature on the topic. They determined that there was a need to refresh
Version 1 of the iNACOL standards. The same process was used in developing Version 2 of the
standards, in addition to having Version 1 as a starting point in the development of the new version.
Over the past three years, iNACOL has received feedback from organizations using these standards
for the development of professional development and evaluation of online teachers. In this new
version of the standards, the indicators have been divided between what the online teachers should
know and understand and what the online teachers should be able to do for evaluation purposes.
These guidelines should be implemented and monitored by each district or organization, as they
reserve the right to apply the guidelines according to the best interest of the population for which
they serve.
The National Standards for Quality Online Teaching are identified on the following pages:
Rating Scale
0 Absentcomponent is missing
1
Unsatisfactoryneeds significant improvement
2
Somewhat satisfactoryneeds targeted improvements
3
Satisfactorydiscretionary improvement needed
4
Very satisfactoryno improvement needed
Standard A
The online teacher knows the primary concepts and structures of effective online instruction and is
able to create learning experiences to enable student success.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardA.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
I think I am very competent science teacher. I also feel like I have great delivery of
content using effective pedagogy in the classroom. I also know what it takes to
continue my effectiveness. I know how to apply real world into the classroom for
example I have collaborative assignments where kids have to organize a community
clean up day to minimize the effects of human population. Kids make little video PSA's
etc. It is really neat. I am able to apply best practices in class and online. However, I
could probably use more practice and experience with blended delivery and effective.
Standard B
The online teacher understands and is able to use a range of technologies, both existing and
emerging, that effectively support student learning and engagement in the online environment.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardB.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
I feel like this is my strongest area. I know how to use and select a variety of online
tools and devices to communicate, produce, collaborate and research. I feel like I
use a variety of applications and mediums in class and online to deliver content. I am
not afraid to try new things with my classes and I incorporate them well. I also am
very good about troubleshooting apps and computer issues. People at my school
come to me for help all of the time and I am able to fix it or have a work around for it.
Standard C
The online teacher plans, designs, and incorporates strategies to encourage active learning,
application, interaction, participation, and collaboration in the online environment.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
The online teacher is able to use studentcentered instructional strategies that are
connected to real-world applications to
engage students in learning (e.g., peerbased learning, inquiry-based activities,
collaborative learning, discussion groups,
self-directed learning, case studies, small
group work, and guided design).
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Standard D
The online teacher promotes student success through clear expectations, prompt responses, and
regular feedback.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardsC&D.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamples
fromtheTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
I believe I have a fairly good background in being able to incorporate active learning and
participation and activities into an online course. I have been practicing these
participatory and collaborative activities with my students using new applications and
social networking sites (Edmodo) and am confident that I can do the same in an blended
environment.
I will need to develop my skills in responding appropriately to the diverse backgrounds
and learning needs of my students. I will actively research this area and strive to apply
my new learning appropriately. All learners have diverse needs. Knowing how to tap into
strengths and weaknesses is essential, as well as differentiating instruction to fit these
needs
D.
This is an area I may need work. Probably my worst area. Although I am confident in my
ability to provide timely and meaningful feedback in a blended environment I am
uncertain about how to establish expectations for interactions and behavior. I plan to
integrate more online discussions in my class this year and hope to gain some insight on
this subject. I also plan on setting up better norms for online expectations. I also want to
learn to give better feedback to my students to encourage change and deeper thinking.
Standard E
The online teacher models, guides, and encourages legal, ethical, and safe behavior related to
technology use.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardE.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
This course asked us to think about and plan how to model, guide and encourage legal
and ethical and safe behaviors related to technology. I also believe I have been provided
excellent resources on academic integrity and copyright. Many of my colleagues and
class peers have offered ideas to be more effective as well. These will be useful
resources to include in my courses, included activities to do, texts to read and videos that
support student learning in this area. Students will know that academic integrity is of
utmost importance.
Standard F
The online teacher is cognizant of the diversity of student academic needs and incorporates
accommodations into the online environment.
10
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardF.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
I have always been aware of the diverse learning styles and abilities of the students in
my classes, as well as a wide range of language abilities but I didn't know all of the
requirements there were to be ADA compliant. Oh my goodness. I would rate myself at
an overall 3 in this category because it is only recently that I learned of the need to
include subtitles, alt text and voice options with my lessons online.
The screen cast assignment we did really allowed me to see what it take to be compliant
and its not easy. I am working to add voice and subtitles in my online lessons, or simply
remake the lessons to be more compliant for kids with hearing and visual impairment.
Standard G
The online teacher demonstrates competencies in creating and implementing assessments in online
learning environments in ways that ensure validity and reliability of the instruments and procedures.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
11
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardG.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
Assessments are really important. Formative assessments are really good ways to see
and check the temperature (so to speak) of the kids. This course used a variety of ways
to assess learning. I really liked how it was based on a pass/fail basis. It either met the
requirement or it didn't and we turned it in until it met the requirements. In my future
classes I will be able to implement a variety of standards based assessments that
assure validity of data that measure a diversity of learning. I will easily make and assign
quality assessments using the many 2.0 tools we have available to us. Managing the
integrity of data collected will be something I will be more keenly aware of. I have good
gradebooks online but giving proper feedback and sharing it in a timely fashion is
something I wil have to work on.
Standard H
The online teacher develops and delivers assessments, projects, and assignments that meet
standards-based learning goals and assesses learning progress by measuring student achievement of
the learning goals.
12
Teacher Abilities
Rating
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardH.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
I would rate myself as 3.5 in this areas because While I am moving toward more
assessment of acquired knowledge and skills I think I am up to date with the new
technology but I am still using regular note taking strategies in class. But I give very rich
assignments that show learning using screen-casting, video making, or digital mental
models. I love using Kahoots and polls and other means of online testing of acquired
knowledge, with more polls and surveys throughout the course rather than just as the end
of a unit this is a good way to do small checks before it is too late.
I also believe I do look for acquired knowledge, because I allow students to replace lower
grades with the newest grade reflecting new understanding.
Standard I
The online teacher demonstrates competency in using data from assessments and other data
sources to modify content and to guide student learning.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
13
Teacher Abilities
Rating
14
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardI.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
The online teacher demonstrates competency in using data from assessments and
other data sources to modify content and to guide student learning.
I would rate myself at a 3 in this category, because even though I am fairly organized
and promptly grade assignments, I am a little slow to and communicate with students
about their assignments. I need to be more vigilant about collecting regular feedback
from the students and adjust accordingly. I do a pretty good job modify assignments to
fit the kids' needs.
I continually seek new and creative ways for self-reflection and student self-reflection.
Also, I think peer assessments are really good for the kids as well. I regularly review
student data to plan instruction and anticipate what is needed in the classroom (faceto-face or blended). I have started using Google Classroom assignments, so that I can
individualize assignments, assessments, and allow extra time as needed to students.
Also it is easy to give feedback.
Standard J
The online teacher interacts in a professional, effective manner with colleagues, parents, and other
members of the community to support students success.
Teacher Abilities
Rating
15
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardJ.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
Instructional Design
The following section outlines standards for instructional design skills for the online teacher of
record, where applicable. These standards are considered optional, as instructional design does not
always fall under online teaching responsibilities.
Standard K
The online teacher arranges media and content to help students and teachers transfer knowledge
most effectively in the online environment.
Rating
The online teacher knows and understands critical digital literacies and 21st century skills.
The online teacher knows and understands appropriate use of technologies to enhance
learning.
Teacher Abilities
16
The online teacher is able to modify and add content and assessment, using an online
Learning Management System (LMS).
The online teacher is able to create and modify engaging content and appropriate
assessments in an online environment.
The online teacher is able to incorporate multimedia and visual resources into an online
module.
The online teacher is able to use and incorporate subject-specific and developmentally
appropriate software in an online learning module.
The online teacher is able to review materials and Web resources for their alignment
with course objectives and state and local standards and for their appropriateness on a
continuing basis.
The online teacher is able to create assignments, projects, and assessments that are aligned
with students different visual, auditory, and hands-on ways of learning.
The online teacher is able to arrange media and content to help transfer knowledge most
effectively in the online environment.
Writeapersonalizedreflectionthatfocusesonyourareasofstrengthandyourareas
forgrowthrelativetoStandardJ.Supportyourreflectionwithspecificexamplesfrom
theTeacherKnowledgeandUnderstandingorTeacherAbilitiessectionsofthe
iNACOLStandardsforQualityOnlineTeaching.
I would rate myself at an overall 4 in this area. I am always looking for new ways to do
things in my class using the most technology as I can. But, at times the flow isn't always
the greatest. Based on the belief that I can always improve but am at the top of my game
in this category.
There is always room for growth, and I am always looking for ways to improve and stay on
the cutting edge as much as possible. I think my students see me always trying new
things and by showing students that I, too, am always learning they see it as a life-long
journey. I need to be more consistent in my use of learning management system and get
kids using it from the beginning of the year. I need to continue using more relevant content
and various styles of assessments, differentiated for student learning styles and abilities. I
use a wide variety of visual resources, and screen materials to assure they meet course
standards.
TOLL-FREE