Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bill
586
2016
Freedom
Index
Score
(+2)
Analyst:
Fred
Birnbaum
Date:
March
14,
2016
ANALYST'S
NOTE:
House
Bill
586,
which
limits
the
acquisition
of
any
additional
land
in
Idaho
by
the
federal
government,
unless
such
acquisition
is
specifically
consented
to
by
an
act
of
the
legislature.
The
federal
government
currently
controls
and
manages
land
equal
to
about
62
percent
of
the
total
land
mass
of
Idaho.
Since
the
1976
passage
of
the
Federal
Land
Policy
and
Management
Act
(FLPMA),
the
federal
government
has
moved
away
from
the
disposal
of
lands
possessed
by
federal
agencies.
Federal
land
management
policies
increasingly
conflict
with
the
health,
safety,
and
economic
security
of
Idahoans.
HB
586
requires
any
land
transferred
to
the
federal
government
be
approved
by
the
legislature
in
accordance
with
Article
1,
Section
8,
Clause
(paragraph)
17
of
the
U.S.
Constitution.
Point
No.
11:
Does
it
restore
or
uphold
the
protections
guaranteed
in
the
U.S.
Constitution
or
the
Idaho
Constitution?
ANALYSIS:
Yes.
HB
586
upholds
the
following
language
in
Article
1,
Section
8,
Clause
17
(emphasis
added),
To
exercise
exclusive
Legislation
in
all
Cases
whatsoever,
over
such
District
(not
exceeding
ten
Miles
square)
as
may,
by
Cession
of
Particular
States,
and
the
Acceptance
of
Congress,
become
the
Seat
of
the
Government
of
the
United
States,
and
to
exercise
like
Authority
over
all
Places
purchased
by
the
Consent
of
the
Legislature
of
the
State
in
which
the
Same
shall
be,
for
the
Erection
of
Forts,
Magazines,
Arsenals,
dock-Yards,
and
other
needful
Buildings
.
(+1)
Point
No.
12:
Does
it
restore
or
uphold
the
principles
of
federalism?
ANALYSIS:
Yes.
HB
586
seeks
to
limit
the
ability
of
the
federal
government
to
gain
control
over
more
land
within
Idahos
border
without
first
getting
the
legislatures
consent.
Current
federal
ownership
of
62
percent
of
the
land
within
Idahos
borders
puts
the
state
increasingly
in
the
position
of
being
an
administrative
unit
of
the
federal
government.
This
bill
is
needed
in
view
of
the
change
in
federal
land
disposal
policy
as
a
result
of
FLPMA,
Section
102
(a)
1.
(+1)