Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NACA
0.16
5.0
1.0
0
0
2424
m
5. Flight level
h 0 m
3
4
Projects
AE Structural design
6. Design speed
V 100 km/h
7. The construction must be accompanied by a documented report of design, analysis, and construction.
8. Supports and loading configuration are depicted in Fig. 15.
9. Grading will be based on the maximum loading to weight ratio (Lmax/W) (20%), accuracy of reported results (25%), project
report (40%), and delivery (15%) as presented in table 1.1.
Table 1.1. Evaluation parameters
Grade
Parameter
Lmax
W
Lmax
W
0.9 to 0.99
0.8 to 0.89
0.7 to 0.79
0.1 to 0.69
95 to 100%
90 to 94.99%
85 to 89.99%
80 to 84.99%
> 79.99%
Documentation is
well written and the
project is well
explained, it meets
all of the
specifications
Documentation or
project lacks of fair
in writing or
explanation, it
meets most of the
specifications
Documentation
and project lacks of
a fair explanation,
it meets most of the
specifications
Documentation
and project lacks of
a fair explanation,
it meets some of
the specifications
Documentation
poorly written and
the project is not
well explained
max
(20%)
Accuracy of analytical
and experimental results
(25%)
Project report (40%)
- Front page
- Index
- Introduction
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results
- Conclusions
5
10
Projects
AE Structural design
References
Delivery was on
time
Delivery was 0 - 6
hours overdue
Delivery was 6 - 12
hours overdue
Penalties:
1. Dimensions: Length/chord tolerance of +/- 4mm, and thickness tolerance of+/-2 mm are allowed; 0.5 points in final grade will
be deducted due to tolerance violations.
2. Loading to weight ratio: Values less than n = 4.4 will be automatically graded 0 (zero).
100
10
150
100
150
After the 24th h had passed, no more project deliveries will be graded
Projects
AE Structural design