Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1
Traditionally, the primary concern of the structural engineer designing a building has
been the provision of a structurally safe and adequate system to support vertical loads. Recently
there has been a considerable increase in the number of tall buildings, both residential and
commercial and the modern trend is towards taller and more slender structures. Thus the effect of
lateral loads like wind loads, earthquake force and blast force etc., are attaining increasing
importance and almost every designer is faced with the problem of providing adequate strength
and stability against lateral loads. This is a new development, as the earlier building designers
usually designed for the vertical loads; and as an afterthought, checked, the final design for
lateral loads as well. Generally those buildings had sufficient strength against lateral loads due to
numerous partitions and short span beams and cross beams; and no modification in the design
was needed. Now, the situation is quite different, and a clear understanding of the effect of lateral
loads on building and the behavior of various components under loads, is essential. With the
increasing use of curtain walls dry walls partitions, and high strength concrete and steel
reinforcement in tall buildings, the effect of wall loads have become more significant.
Page 2
4. SHEAR WALLS:
Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings often have vertical plate-like RC walls called Shear
Walls. Shear walls are vertical elements of the horizontal force resisting system. Or Shear walls
are vertical walls that are designed to receive lateral forces from diaphragms and transmit them
CADS, PESCE, Mandya
Page 3
Fig.1
Further, most RC buildings with shear walls also have columns; these columns primarily
carry gravity loads (i.e., those due to self-weight and contents of building). Shear walls provide
large strength and stiffness to buildings in the direction of their orientation, which significantly
reduces lateral sway of the building and thereby reduces damage to structure and its contents.
Since shear walls carry large horizontal earthquake forces, the overturning effects on them are
large. Thus, design of their foundations requires special attention. Shear walls should be
provided along preferably both length and width. However, if they are provided along only one
direction, a proper grid of beams and columns in the vertical plane (called a moment-resistant
frame) must be provided along the other direction to resist strong earthquake effects.
Door or window openings can be provided in shear walls, but their size must be small to
ensure least interruption to force flow through walls. Moreover, openings should be
symmetrically located. Special design checks are required to ensure that the net cross-sectional
area of a wall at an opening is sufficient to carry the horizontal earthquake force. Shear walls in
buildings must be symmetrically located in plan to reduce ill-effects of twist in buildings (Fig.
2). They could be placed symmetrically along one or both directions in plan. Shear walls are
more effective when located along exterior perimeter of the building such a layout increases
resistance of the building to twisting.
CADS, PESCE, Mandya
Page 4
Page 5
Earthquake
STIFFNESS
Force
STRENGTH
Sliding
Page 6
To
prevent
non-structural
damage
in
frequent
minor
ground
shaking
Shear walls function by working as a large vertical cantilever which has the ability to
resist large seismic forces. They can be very efficient in resisting horizontal loads and generally
provide strength much more economically than a frame structure. The reason for this extra
strength is because they can be designed to have some ductility. To have this ductility they are
designed with internal steel frames, this allows them to survive even after major damage has
been inflicted. Shear walls must provide the necessary lateral strength to resist horizontal
earthquake forces. When shear walls are strong enough, they will transfer these horizontal forces
to the next element in the load path below them. These other components in the load path may be
other shear walls, slabs or footings.
Shear walls also provide lateral stiffness to prevent the roof or floor above from excessive
side-sway. When shear walls are stiff enough, they will prevent floor and roof framing member
from moving off their supports. Also, buildings that are sufficiently stiff will usually suffer less
nonstructural damage.
4.4 Strength Of Shear Walls:
Shear walls, in particular, must be strong in themselves and also strongly connected to
each other and to the horizontal diaphragms. In a simple building with shear walls at each end,
ground motion enters the building and creates inertial forces that move the floor diaphragms.
This movement is resisted by the shear walls and the forces are transmitted back down to the
foundation.
As shear walls act primarily as cantilevers they have three basic failure modes, shown in
(Fig.4). While designing the walls a balance must be found in the ratio of vertical load and
CADS, PESCE, Mandya
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
mm the bars should be provided as two mats in the plane of the wall one on each face.
3. The diameter of the bars should not exceed 1/10th of the thickness of the part of the wall.
4. The maximum spacing should not exceed L/5, 3t or 450 mm, where L and t are length
and thickness of the wall respectively.
5. Vertical steel provided in the wall for shear should not be less than horizontal steel
Reinforcements for Shear
CADS, PESCE, Mandya
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
For particular case of x/L < 0.5 and neglecting small quantities we get
Page 13
Page 14
Axial force(kN)
1950
250
Moment (kNm)
600
4800
Shear(kN)
20
700
Solution
Step1 Determination of design loads
P1= (0.8x1950) + (1.2x250) =1,860 kN
P2= 1.2 (1950+250) = 2,640 kN
Moment =1.2 (4800+600) = 6480 kNm
Shear=1.2 (700+20) = 864 kN
Step2 check for requirement of boundary elements
Assuming uniform thickness, L=4160 mm; t=250 mm
CADS, PESCE, Mandya
Page 15
I=
^12
mm4
A=bd=4160x250=1.04x106 mm2
fc=
0.25
= 0.25
=0.92 N/mm
=1.25 N/mm2
Page 16
d=3780 mm
required
Page 17
available
= 0.628
Pw = 1860
= 0.516 ( we know)
< 0.5
Page 18
= 0.041
Mu=0.041 x 25 x 250 x 34002 =2370 kNm < 6480 kNm (required)
Axial load =
kN
This load acts as tension at one end and compression at other end
Step 12 Calculate the compression due to axial loads at these ends
Page 19
=750mm2
Provide 4 nos. 16 mm bar =804 mm2
Provide 2 nos. 16 mm , one on each face of the wall, on all the sides of the hole to compensate
for the steel cut off by the hole.
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
REFERENCES:
IS 1893(Part 1) : 2002, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, BIS, New
Delhi
IS 13920: 1993 code of practice for Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures
subjected to seismic forces.
P.C.Varghese, Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design, Prentice-Hall of India Private
Limited, New Delhi, 2001 .
Page 24