Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
The design and performance analysis of many
power systems require computer simulation since
prototype testing has become almost impossible due
to high costs. If the circuit incorporates a number of
semi-conductor switches, machines and feedback
control, computer simulation is the only viable
solution for testing a design. In the literature [l],
numerous digital computer simulation studies of
induction motors fed from power electronic
converters have been reported. Majority of these
studies neglect the power electronic topology, and the
converter is modeled as an ideal source with zero
impedance.
Current research is directed towards developing
simulation methods, which can efficiently and
accurately describe the behavior of the circuit without
complexity in problem formulation or long
computation. An alternative way for formulating the
dynamic drive analysis was suggested [2], using: first
a simplified dq transformation so that the stator
variables are in the actual abc phase quantities,
second the semiconductor switches are modeled as
binary inductors, a low value during the conduction,
and infinite otherwise. Additionally, this analysis has
been based on a state space formulation of the circuit
equations. This, in it self, poses several difficulties,
when considering the development of a generalpurpose software [3]. Despite the fact that a variety
of state-space based formulations have been
0-7803-5957-7/00/$10.00
0 2000 IEEE
345
(d)
cos(@,+
(0
cos(@,+ @) cos(@,- @)
cos(@,) cos(@,+ @)
cos(@,-a) cos(@,)
(7)
dt
Ax=b
T, - T ,
dw
i + f,w,
dt
(9)
(3)
Z3 LL,. (i,
cos 6,
+ i,
cos(8,
+ D) + im cos(@, -
(11)
as,'
v, = R, i,
+M ,
dt
where M , = 1.4,
3 Ls
The new state formulation becomes:
346
(12)
where
'
- 2 Lm
3 L,
J , = i, cos(@,)+ i, cos(@,+ @)
+ i, COS(@, - @)
+ i, cos(@,- @)
J , = i,< cos(@,)+ i,
COS(@,
- @)
(16)
+ i,=cos(@,- @)
+ @) + i, cos(@,- @)
,.
. .
. ,.
. . . ,.
+ imiSc)sinOr
+
( i ~+i,bisc
, ~ +i,i,a)sin(Q, -a)+
(i,i,c + i,i, + i,i,b)sin(@, + 0)
0
'
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
T l m a I" . e 5
-80
I
0.1
0.2
Tlin.
0.3
I" s e c
0.4
0.5
0.6
-20 I
0
I
0 1
0 2
Tlm.
0 3
I" * e 5
0 4
0 5
0 6
347
"ephasc
w m
AC-Dc mnvwion
~-
1-
7Z"
-_
5. SIMULATION EXAMPLES
MATLAB-SIMULINK IMPLEMENTATION
348
<
+ x
Switch test for hlockin
Yes
MATLAB
SIMULINK
Updating switches,
voltage and current
Update time
Lw
t=?
__ __ - - __ - - __ - - - __ __ - - .._
- -_-.....- _____
-.
+--?s
_--- -- - - - ---- --
_.___
CONCLUSION
The new dynamic model of induction motors
presented in this paper has shown accurate simulation
results. The simulation of the behavior of an
induction machine has been canied-out with the help
of MATLAB-SIMULINK. For comparison, the
commercial package PSIM was used. Results show a
good agreement and similar simulation time.
Furthermore, the solution presented here can be
implemented concurrently in the parallel computing
systems and will be presented in a next paper.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work is supported by funds from HydroQuebecNQTR industrial Research Chair at the
University of Quebec at Trois-Rivihes.
Algorithm
Backward Euler
Trapezoidal
REFERENCE
J. D. Lavers and R.W.Y Cheung, A Software
Package for the Steady State and Dynamic
Simulation of Induction Motor Drives, IEEE
Transactions Power System, Vol. PWRS-1,
May 1986, pp. 167-173.
S.A. Sudha, A. Chandrasekaran, V. Rajagopalan
& H. Mehta, A New Modular Approach to
Modelling of Converter-Fed Induction Motor,
IMACS-TC1 93, pp. 171-176.
[31 R.W.Y. Cheung, H. Jin, B.Wu and J.D. Lavers,
A Generalized Computer-Aided Formulation
for The Dynamic and Steady State Analysis of
Induction Machine Inverter Drive Systems,
IEEE Transactions On Energy conversion, Vol.
5, No. 2, June 1990, pp. 337-343.
[41 H. Selhi & R.Y.R Hui, The Application of
Transmission-Line Modeling to The Simulation
of An Induction Motor Drive, IEEE
Transactions On Energy Conversion, Vol. 11,
No. 2, June 96, pp. 287-297.
R.Y.R Hui, Decoupled Simulation of MultiStage Power Electronic Systems Using
Transmission-Line Links, IEEE Transactions
on Power Electronics, Vol. 11, No.2, June 94,
pp. 287-297.
[61 MATLAB-SIMULINK Users guide, The
Mathworks, inc., 1992.
[71 H. Magbahi, A. Ba-razzouk, 3. Xu, A. Chkriti, &
V. Rajagopalan Simulation Numtrique en
Electronique de Puissance Utilisant MatlabSimulink, IEEE CCECE, Waterlo 1998, pp.
473-476.
r.81 S.N. Ghani, Digital Computer Simulation of
Three Phase Induction Machine Dynamics. A
Generalized Approach, IEEE Transactions Ind.
Appl., V0124, No.1, 1988, pp.106-114.
[91 H. Jin, PSIM: Power Electronic System
Simulator, Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering, Concordia University,
Montreal, Canada, 1995.
[lo] A. Ba-razzouk, A. Chtriti, G. Olivier and P.
Sicard, Field-Oriented Control of Induction
Motors Using Neural-Network Decouplers,
IEEE Transactions On Power Electronics
Vol.
12,
No.4
1997,
pp.752-763.
Capacitor
ik+l
= yc Vk+l
- yc
Vk
4+l
= YL
vk+l+
--.Vk-,)
2h
349
Y;;C
ik+l=yLvk+l+(&vk+ik)
ik+l=Kvk+l-(yCvk+ik)
2c
S~cond-orderGear i,,, = Y,.V,+, - (--.Vk
Impedance
Inductor
i,,, =Y.vk+l(-.ik--ik&l)
y,
Y, =
Y L = hi
=; y , =
3c
-;
2h
A
2 L
2h
= 3L