Evaluating An Event Driven Application – D3

After showing my note saver application to two other people I received some
positive and negative feedback, I was also given suggestions to further improve
my program. I was told that overall the functionality of the program was
excellent, there were no major hiccups while using the note saver. However I was
given the suggestion to add a web browser to the application as when notes are
being taken down, it would be handy to have the internet to look up things which
are not understood or to even to do some further research.

Overall I received positive feedback and gained information on how to further

improve my program and did so by adding a web browser to the notepad. There
were some problems however with using the save and open buttons on the note
saver as they were not functioning properly, the testers said that when they tried
to open or save, the program wasn’t responding.

After reviewing their views and opinions I managed to fix the problems of the
two buttons. Below is a testing table showing the results of testing my note saver.

TEST TEST DATA EXPECTED ACTUAL TEST RESULT

USED OUTPUT OUTPUT
CmdOpen Opens the Opened the Works correctly
students desired file the student
file wanted
CmdSave Saves the Saved the Doesn’t work
student’s notes students notes
CmdExit Closes the Closes the Works correctly
notesaver students
notesaver

Below there is a questionnaire which my users partook in to see the overall

evaluation of my program.
Questionnaire for evaluation of program

1 = Excellent
2 = Very Good
3 = Average
4 = Poor
5 = Very bad

The above show the statements which my two users will use to judge the ease
and functionality of the program.

User one

What was the overall design of the program like? 2

How was the navigation of the program like? 3

How much sense did the program make sense to you? 1

How enjoyable was the program to use? 3

How satisfied were you to use the program? 1

User Two

What was the overall design of the program like? 3

How was the navigation of the program like? 3

How much sense did the program make sense to you? 1

How enjoyable was the program to use? 2

How satisfied were you to use the program? 2

User Three
What was the overall design of the program like? 2

How was the navigation of the program like? 2

How much sense did the program make sense to you? 1

How enjoyable was the program to use? 2

How satisfied were you to use the program? 1

User Four

What was the overall design of the program like? 1

How was the navigation of the program like? 1

How much sense did the program make sense to you? 1

How enjoyable was the program to use? 3

How satisfied were you to use the program? 2

User Five
What was the overall design of the program like? 3

How was the navigation of the program like? 3

How much sense did the program make sense to you? 3

How enjoyable was the program to use? 3

How satisfied were you to use the program? 2

How satisfied were you to use the program

How enjoyable was the program to use

How much sense did the program make sense to you

How was the navigation of the program like

What was the overall design of the program like

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

The graph above shows the results from the users and I can see that most of the
users seemed to enjoy using the program. Overall it looks like that the navigation
of the program was good as you can see from the graph. The overall design of the
program was also very good. However it seems like the program didn’t seem to
make sense to some of the users, aside from that, overall it has gotten good
results as I have evaluated from the graph above.