Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262912702
READS
415
1 AUTHOR:
Arunkumar Velusamy
sudharsan engineering college
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
ABSTRACT:
The objective of the current paper is to identify the students attitudes and intentions toward
entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship is considered as engine of economic growth. That plays a
great role in the economic growth and development of the country, more so in a rapidly
developing country like India. Entrepreneurship development today has assumed great
significance as it is a key to economic development. Entrepreneurs are the seed of industrial
development and its fruits are greater employment opportunities, increase in per capita income,
higher standard of living and balanced regional development. The current paper attempts to
review and analyze the empirical studies undertaken to find out the entrepreneurial intention
among university students and find out the factors influencing their decision to venture in
entrepreneurship.
Hence,
intentions are formed and how new venture founders beliefs, perceptions and motives impact
the intent to start a business.
Ethen Duyglues in his study of 170 MBA students tried to investigate whether
entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs have systematically different psychological characteristics,
especially in terms of proactive behaviour or personality. He used the entrepreneurship model
proposed by Kostova (1997). The model suggests that among other things, those certain
entrepreneurial activities and these characteristics make them different from non-entrepreneurs.
It was found that 67.9 percent of the students were found to be entrepreneurially inclined. The
income of the family and profession of the family members was found to be a significant factor
that influences the entrepreneurial orientation of students. A strong relationship between
proactive behaviour and entrepreneurship orientation was found in the study.
Evan, d (2005), investigated the role of entrepreneurial attitudes and entrepreneurial selfefficacy on an individuals intention to engage in entrepreneurial behaviour. Their sample
consisted of 414 students surveyed at the beginning of their first entrepreneurship class in MBA
programs in Australia (46), China (39), India (204) and Thailand (125) between 2003 and 2004.
They measured the entrepreneurial intentions of the students using a 7 point scale ranging from
very unlikely (1) to very likely (7) over eight items measuring intentions to engage in a range of
entrepreneurial behaviour. Their result found that individuals who prefer more income, more
independence and more ownership have high entrepreneurial intentions. The study found no
relationship between risk propensity and entrepreneurial intention significant positive
relationships were also found between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention.
Douglas, E., (1999), in his study investigated the relationship between the intention to
start ones own business and individuals attitude towards income, independence, risk and work
effort. Results of his study suggest that individuals having more positive attitude towards
independence and risk are characterised by higher willingness to become an entrepreneur.
Factors which Impact Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions
A conceptual model of the entrepreneurial decision process
Internal factors /
Personality
Willingness to
Take risks
Need for
Independence
Locus of control
Etc.
Other Factor
Attitude towards
Self-employment
External factors /
Environment
Market
Financing
Society
University
- Inspiration
- Training
- Networking
- Etc.
Entrepreneurial
Intention
Entrepreneurial
Activity
Entrepreneurial Attitudes
An attitude is a complex mental state involving beliefs, feelings, values, and dispositions to act
in certain ways Attitudes tend to change across time and situations through an interactive
process with the environment, and can offer a prediction about a persons future actions
(Carlson, 1985). The work of Robinson, Stimpson, Huefner, and Hunt (1991) was one of the first
to use an attitudinal scale to predict entrepreneurial activity. They designed the Entrepreneurial
Attitude Orientation (EAO) scale to measure entrepreneurial attitudes based on the constructs of
achievement, innovation, personal control and self-esteem. Achievement in business refers to
concrete results associated with the start of a business; personal control of business outcomes
concerns ones perception of control or influence over his or her business; innovation in business
relates to acting on business activities in novel ways; and perceived self-esteem in business
relates to self-confidence with regard to ones business affairs.
The theory of planned behavior argues that intention is an antecedent to behavior (Azjen, 1991),
and prior studies have shown that intentions play a crucial role in understanding the
entrepreneurial process (Shapero & Sokol 1982; Krueger, 1993; Krueger & Brazeal, 1994).
Shapero and Sokol (1982) argue that attitudes are linked with entrepreneurial intentions,
especially in perceived venture feasibility and desirability. Additional research found that
positive entrepreneurial exposure can impact intentions (Krueger, 1993), though this may vary
according to individual characteristics and situations (Krueger & Brazeal, 1994).
more likely start their business than female students. The age of the students also have an
influence on their entrepreneurial intention as it was found that students in the age group 30-35
were more inclined towards entrepreneurship than the middle aged.
REFERENCES
1. Ethem, Duv (2008), Institutional profiles and Entrepreneurship Orientation: A case of Tarkish
Graduate (2008) Students, MPRA Paper No. 7247, Izmir, Turkey.
2. Evan, D, (2005), Individual Intentions towards entrepreneurship Vs Entrepreneurship,
working paper, University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
3. Douglas, E., (1999) Entrepreneurship as a career choice. Attitudes entrepreneurial intentions
and utility maximizations, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley,
Massachusetts.
4.Bygrave, W.D. (1989) The entrepreneurial paradigm: a philosophical look at its research
methodologies, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, pp. 7-26.
5.Carlson, S. D. (1985). Consistency of attitude components: A new approach for an old
problem. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (09B), 3261.
6. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Decision
Processes, 50, 179-211.
7. Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new
venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18 (1), 5-21.
8.Shapero, A. and Sokol, L. (1982). Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L.
Sexton and K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90), Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Author1:Dr.C.Gnanaprakasam
HOD-Agni Scholl of Business Excellence, Morepatti, Vadamadurai, Dindigul - 624802.
Author2: Arunkumar.V, Assistant Professor, Department of Management studies, Sudharsan
Engineering College, Sathiyamangalam, Pudukkottai-6220501
E-Mail: arunvklplm@gmail.com
Ph:9787089988