Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FILED
Sl'
, S
C" C
., U,S, DISTRICT COURT
UN'11'''I)
r_
,
ATES DI TRI I 'OUR I DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IHSTRICT OF MARYLAND
Southern Dil'isioll
C11.""HI(SOf
(;f:OIH"a: J..\RROIlIl,\HL
March 3, 2016
RE: Kimbalill\'.
Frry,
GJlI-13-3059
LETTER OIWER
Dear Counsel
decisions
Kimberlin's
in its February
11,2016
Motion to Reconsider
Kimberlin
is DENIED.
ofpoliee
materials
department.
in Killg \'.
to a plaintilTraising
(ECF No. 320) because the Court failed to apply the test established
Quash Subpoenas
IJowever,
Motion to Reconsider
of specifIc materials:'
King addresses
against
the disclosure
I'.
of documents
in posscssion
of onicers
srr hi.. and this Court has only applied King in instances
1988).
or a pol ice
in which production
is
Here, Kimberlin
seeks personnel
Kimbcrlin
Amend Complaint
of specific materials:"
District
in King is inapplicable
ancl
threshold
i'vlotion
to the Court's
I(l!"
Lem'e to
ruling,
ECF No. 348 at 2. lie also argues that his dccision to amend at this point is
1 I. 2016 I.etter
Order, the Court reminded Kimberlin on two prior occasions that "no further amendments [to thc
Complaint] will be permitted." See ECF No. 88 at 5: ECF No. 133. Additionally. on June 11.
2015, Kimberlin notified the Court that he intended to add the LA District Attorney's Oftice. see
ECF No. 286, but he failed to move for joiner of party and amendment of pleadings by the June
15.2015 deadline, see ECF No. 279 at 2. Accordingly. Kimberlin's Motion to Reconsider the
Order relating to his Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is DENIED.
Although informal. this is an Order of the Court and shall be docketed as such.
GEORGE 1. HAZEL
United States District Judge