This

is not LAW OR LEGAL THIS IS CIVICS

How to control the Man in a black robe

Written by

a Man;

Who is a self-proclaimed idiot and proud

Written on the nineteenth day of the fifth month; year twenty fifteen.
Gregorian Calendar

This is For the People

Resistance to Tyranny is Obedience to the

Creator of the Cosmos

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE DISTRIBUTED FOR FREE

The People Must learn to hold their servants to
Their Contracts with the People

1. Firstly i: would like to commend every alleged Judge whom i: have been
in the presence of, as an alleged defendant; and; aggrieved party; ranging
from; Magistrates; Crown; and; High Court, as you have made it possible for
this writing to be completed.
2. The reason i: say alleged Judge, is due to the fact these people who sit
behind the bench in Courts are not Judges; the are factually Magistrates with
the ability to be a wo(man)s Judge, if YOU allow them to be.
3. There is much factual evidence i: can bring to the table in which would
proves this argument; but frankly i: have chosen not to bore the reader with
countless ramblings; and chosen to opt for the simple common sense
approach.
4. Firstly we the people know we are Governed by consent a simple look on
the home office website will also substantiate this. i: am not here to lay an
argument to prove the above fact; but in good faith i: have identified a source
where you may find this information.
5. Secondly we the people must understand how the Governing structure is
organised its quite simple really;

Monarch (Crown)
Parliament (Crown)
Public Servants

6. So the Monarch being at the top of the order of Government; any authority
would have to come from those who appointed the Monarch to be position of
office. For those whom wish to get more in detail on this particular area i:
suggest you obtain a book on Jurisprudence.
7. So let us take a look at what is commonly known as the Coronation Oath;
who it applies to and who its made with;
8. Extract taken from: http://www.royal.gov.uk/
In the Coronation ceremony of 2 June 1953, one of the highlights was when
The Queen made her Coronation Oath (taken from the Order of Service for
the Coronation).
The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on
Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses
of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of
Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the
Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,
Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?

And the Queen answering,

I am willing.
The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and The Queen, having a
book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:
Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia,
New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your
Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining,
according to their respective laws and customs?
Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.
Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be
executed in all your judgements?
Queen. I will.
Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God
and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power
maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established
by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church
of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as
by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and
Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all
such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of
them?
Queen. All this I promise to do.
Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of
State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn
Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right
hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the
procession and is now brought from the Altar by the Arch-bishop, and
tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:
The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So
help me God.
Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.
The Queen having thus taken her Oath shall return again to her Chair, and
the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.
9. The oath above is made to the people; and GqD meaning the monarch has
a contract with we the people, to govern the peoples according to their usages
and customs; and maintain the laws of God and the true profession of the

Gospel. Notice she shall Sign the Oath in the transcript.

10. So it is safe to say Elizabeth Windsor Queen of the common wealth has a
tangible oath of office with her signature on, that we the people ma see if we
wish.
11. We the people have given the Monarch the Power to be in position of
office; you may also refer to the two treaties of Government by John Locke;
for more information to satisfy curiosity. As he speaks in detail about Man
being saved from slavery and the ideology of absolute Monarchy and no Man
has his natural freedoms; as discorded by dastardly men such as Sir Robert
Filmer, and His Followers, whom were successfully overthrown. By King
William known to be the great restorer.
12. So the Monarch is allegedly the fountain of Justice according to her Oath
and must perform on this contract as described. You can also obtain a copy of
Blackstones commentaries or the writings of Sir Edward Coke they confirm in
the Early practices of The Curis Regis Court of Kings Bench; the King sat
there in person and administered Justice.
13. Due to the growing number of suits the King decided to elect good
wo(man) to take his place in more simpler suits whilst he would still sit on
more complex cases. As population increased this system also became
impractical and had to change; so Justices were elected for each county and
courts of record is at the County Court and there you have todays current
Justice System.
14. According to Blackstones commentaries and sir Edward coke; the
Justices are meant to be a representation of the King; So naturally they must
swear an oath of allegiance to the Monarch; Binding them in contract with the
Monarch; who in turn is Bound in Contract with the People.
15. Now we may bring forth the two oaths of office members of the Judiciary
must take; this extract is taken from; www.judiciary.gov.uk
16. Oath of Allegiance to the Queen
I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear
true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and
successors, according to law.
17. Judicial Oath
I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve
our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ ,
and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this
realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.

18. There are also affirmative versions also but I have opted for the Oath
style. Now its safe to presume if a verbal contract is not worth the paper its
written on; and; Just as The fountain; (Monarch) Surly those whom are
meant to be representing the Monarch have a tangible Oath of office also
known as a judicial warrant.
14. Again we the people may wish to see this oath of office at any time; and in
my opinion if your going to the public court house for a proceeding you ma
wish to see this to ensure there is not a PRIVATE COURT operating in the
background.
15. Now i: have substantiated all Public officials have a tangible Oath of
office, i: will further detail as to why; from the Supreme Court down, there are
NO Judges; Only Magistrates; BUT they can be your Judge IF you accept the
contract and do not rebut the Claim.
16. According to the Laws of GqD detailed in the Bible; [Weather its true or
not is not up for debate at the moment] but this is what the system is based
upon.
17. There are several things inside the bible which details how Judgement
should be done; Mathew 7.1 Judge not least ye be Judged. Now to say
these were the intentions of the word Jesus for no one to Judge one would
question how would one make discernment.
18. So now we must look at who Christ was talking to; he was talking to Man
to remind them to be careful in their judgment to another man as they also
have a beam in their eye and the same judgement will be afforded to them;
there are many verses to prove this but this is not a Church lesson.
19. So we can say, Man ma Judge another but do so with great caution; C.f
Blackstones Commentaries Trial by Jury; this is also proven by the order of
the children of Israel, under the Moses, where the first Jury, is believed to be
established.
20. So a Man(s) brother or Brethren ma stand in Judgment against him as
hold him accountable to the customs and usages of their society, and only a
Man(s) Creator or brethren will truly know if he has done wrong.
21. To further confirm this is part of the laws of England without going into its
Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction; would simply be to obtain a copy of Blackstones
commentaries Private wrongs and see the Chapter Trail By Jury.
22. The maxim of Law States; where the truth is fiction of law does not exist.
So a Man being true evidence of divine creation; fiction of law does not exist
to a Man; and; Man being Heir of the Sovereign divine source of creation must
reign supreme of any FICTION OF LAW. This does not make man Lawless as
the laws of the divine and nature bind man.

23. So the Man in the robe whom holds a fictitious position of office does not
exist to the Creator of that office whom is Man. The order of Divinity is as
follows;

The divine
Man
Monarch
Government
Public Servants

24. Further more how can the Man in the robe claim to be your Judge and he is
not your creator nor peer? It is well known in the Laws of England a Man has the
right to a trail by `Jury of His peers; so no wo(man) from the Legal Society are
your peers because you are now licensed Law Practitioners; neither are you
under Oath to their society.

25. The Only way the guy in the Black robe may be your Judge is if you allow him
to be. I: have taken the liberty to do a transcript of a typical scenario a woman
may have with these UNLAWFUL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS and a solution to
how it should be handled in my opinion

26. Just for shits and giggles; the main characters in this story are man known as
Bob Jones; and; Joseph Smith.

27. One day BOB received a Summons [invitation] in the post; it was to the Public
Courthouse; to answer a charge; the charge is irrelevant.

28. Bob opened the summons got out his red pen drew a line diagonally through
it and wrote the words Void; initialled and dated it and turn it over and signed
and dated the back. He also extracted the following information;

Summons venue:
Date:
Time:
Issuing Officer:
Informant:

29. Bob placed the summons back inside the envelope and sealed it up and wrote
the following information on the front;

No contact return to sender
i: do not recognise you
i: do not understand you intent
No assured value No liability
Cease and Desist communication immediately
Further unwanted communication will be deemed as Tort
C.f Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

30. He initialled [not signed] and dated the front of the envelope made a
photocopy of both sides including the return address and put it back in the post;
and went home for a beer.

31. Meanwhile his friend Joseph also received a summons in the post, Joseph was
different to Bob, Joseph was your token Citizen, who always did what he was told
without question.

32. Joseph became really anxious and couldnt sleep that night; and he decided
that he wall call a LIAR sorry i: mean lawyer; or pimp sorry a solicitor
immediately in the morning

33. The next morning Joseph woke up and got on the phone and hired the finest
solicitor in town and paid him finest money to take on the case.

34. Meanwhile bob woke up and wrote a Notice to the; Informant; and Issuing
officer stating he is in receipt of some unwanted communications; and the action
he has taken against this action, [return to sender stuff] he also provides a digital
image of the envelope as poof of his actions; and requires questions to answered
before any further commencement of proceedings; should these questions not be
answered then any further communication is unwanted and will be deemed as
tort, And witnessed by the; Postmaster; or; Notary; or The authority two good
Man.

35 These were Bobs Questions;

What authority requires Performance?
Where does this authority arise?
Do you have subject matter jurisdiction over a Man?
The Conclusions of Law and Finding of facts for your actions?

He sent the relevant documents to the relevant parties; (informant and issuing
officer) Giving them 7 days to respond.

36. Bob also wrote a declaration under the penalty of perjury and got it
witnessed stating that he will be making his presence known to aid and assist the
court under threat, duress, and coercion, and filed this at the Public Courthouse.

37. After 7 days bob received no response this was great for Bob whilst on the
other hand Joseph was 1500 lighter and really stressed out.

38. So bob wrote a notice of fault and opportunity to cure; and sent it to the
informant and issuing officer; inquiring why they have not responded; giving
them a further seven days to respond; or they tacitly agree they have no locus
standi in this matter; they act in ultra vires and abuse court process; their case
must be discharged with immediate effect, Got it witnessed and sent off.

39. Seven days later Still Bob had received no response this was excellent for bob
as he now issued a notice of default/dishonour and has the informant and

issuing officer tied in a tacit agreement. Meanwhile Joseph was now 3,000
lighter and becoming depressed.

40. So Bob decided he was going to make a claim of tort; particulars of this tort;
is abusing the proper process of a court and colour of Law; ultra vires; and use
the tacit agreement to evidence this tort and the relief sought is a discharge of
their case and to be let alone

41 Bob now files this on demand at the public Court House; and gives notice to
the informant; and issuing officer; of his actions. Meanwhile Joseph is back and
forth from his [pimp] Solicitors, running around like a headless chicken signing
documents he can not even comprehend.

42. The Big day in Court Bob decides to file a notice with the Delivery manager of
the Court giving notice he is present at Court and collects and order of service;
this is to ensure the man in the black robe doesnt commit fraud by false
representation and send out his bullys with weapons to get you.

43. Whereas Joseph is instructed to plead guilty so he get a lesser sentence and
Joseph be Joseph he sure did; what lovely advice he paid for. Jospeh was found
guilty and sentencing was pronounced upon him, by way of a substantial fine and
community order.

44. Bob walks inside the court claim in had and is asked for his name; he replies
i dont cause harm; and before we proceed in the society i: am from; it is
courteous for all parties to a proceeding; must introduce themselves to each
other; and; the maxim of law states it is my right to know with whom i: deal, with
that said, i: am a man known as bob who are you?

45. Judges/Magistrates response: i: am Judge Justice Diversion; Bob replies i:
except; for you to be my judge I wish for you to provide evidence you are my
creator or one of my peers should you not be able to do this then you are a
magistrate and i: accept your oath of office and indemnity attached to it, do you
understand? [Bob just created a common law court scary is it not]

46 The Judge went nuts at this point and started to become aggressive bob
simply stated i: except and i: know i: have been clear on the facts and wish to
move onto the next item of question.

47.Bob; Has the magistrate received my claim? Magistrate yes: Now Bob
presses his claim on the record simply by repeating these two sentences;
i: a man; Bob Jones; one of the people of England in this Court of record make the
claim of tort; See Exhibit A this tort Comes by way of abuse of Court process and
colour of Law; ultra vires. he states relief sought and wishes for the magistrate to
witness the order and stand on his square.

48. The magistrate at this time going mental and realising Bob has the
prosecution tacitly agreeing they have no Jurisdiction he is left with no other
choice as a humble servant to witness Bobs Order. Case Closed.


49. You ma come across a belligerent magistrate that wants to test you to see if
you really know what your doing my advice would be to study more of what this
document details use the reference and always make sure you have copies of the
oath of office to hand when going to court because the Magistrate knows the
penalty for breaching his oath..