Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JessicaBell.org
Seven Tips to
Facilitating a
Great Meeting
Jessica Bell
campaigns | facilitation | training
jessicabell.org
1. Know your
role and own it
A
JessicaBell.org
Own that power. If you let the group dis- Here are seven tips that can help
cuss and decide how to proceed on pro- you lead an effective meeting.
cess, then you could lose control of the
meeting. People generally dont want to
make decisions about how to make decisions. They want you to lead that process Despite all this talk of power, youre not a
so they can get on with the important stuff dictator. A facilitator does not make deci making the decision.
sions for the group, and usually facilitators
dont even share their own opinion. In other
That said, you can still ask for advice on words, the facilitator does not respond dihow to proceed. For instance, you can rectly to a meeting participant with a comsay something like are we ready to do a ment like I disagree with your proposal to
vote on this? If you need extra help then host a workshop next week. If you have
call a five minute break and ask one skilled a vested interest in the outcome, its probaperson to help you decide on next steps. bly best not to take on the role of facilitator.
Good facilitators constantly read the group
to ensure the team feels good with their
process-decisions. But ultimately, the decision on how to proceed is yours.
2. The agenda
is key
Ask members for agenda items at least a week before the meeting so they have time to think
of some topics and develop a thoughtful
proposal to email to people prior to the
meeting.
2.
4. Dont overload the agenda. Topics usually take longer than allocated, and people
love a facilitator who concludes the meeting early.
JessicaBell.org
A typical agenda
1. Introductions
2. Review and approve the agenda
3. Assign roles (e.g. note taker,
stack)
4. Establish ground rules
5. One or two non-controversial
quick and easy topics
6. Difficult agenda items, starting
with the most important so you
dont run out of time before addressing it and energy in the room
is still high.
7. Review decisions. Who is doing
what? What are our next steps.
8. Set the time and location of the
next meeting.
JessicaBell.org
3. Logistics
matter
If you are showing a PowerPoint presentation, have it saved in three formats (PC,
Mac, and PDF). Collect, order and/or confirm all AV equipment, laptops, and connector cords. Bring a USB stick and an
extension cord. Check that markers work
liminating logistical problems requires and that you have flip chart paper and/or
attention-to-detail. Dont be the facilitator whiteboards available in the room.
who has everyone waiting half an hour because someone has to buy that Mac con- Arrive 30 minutes early to set up.
nector cord that your presenter forgot to
bring.
JessicaBell.org
4. Respect the
rules
Know
Common decision-making
structures
Consensus. Everyone agrees, or
everyone agrees not to oppose a
decision.
80% voting majority. The decision
is approved if 80% of people vote
for it.
51% majority. The decision is approved if 51% of people vote for it.
1 or 2 people hold the power. This
is fairly typical in hierarchical decision-making environments, such as
many large nonprofit organizations.
5. Respect the
culture and the
code
JessicaBell.org
Some groups have a culture of loose facilitation, where the facilitator rarely intervenes and allows for members to stray a
little. Other groups have a culture of tight
facilitation, where the facilitator might keep
rigid track of who is speaking and how long
they can speak for. For instance, Roberts
Rules of Order is a very formal decisionmaking code that is often used by legislative bodies and some groups that abide by
a 51% majority decision making system.
Roberts Rules of Order would be inappropriate in an activist group that makes all decisions using consensus.
Some groups like to make decisions in advance. For instance, many community and
labour groups have staff interview representatives from key groups and craft proposals based upon these interviews. The
proposal is usually developed, adapted,
and informally agreed upon prior to the
meeting. Approval of the decision at the
meeting is often just a formality. Controversial decisions that wouldnt get approval
have already been discarded. Other groups
might see this process as undemocratic.
The variations on meeting culture are endless. The best way to find out a groups culture is to ask questions and observe their
other meetings. Then abide by the code.
Gentle Intervention
JessicaBell.org
Silence
Supports
Persuasive
Suggests choices
It seems like we have two proposals here that capture what people are saying; would it be okay if we
focus on these two proposals?
Suggests process
Sharing ideas
Directive
Guidance
Directing
6.Moving
through an
agenda item
JessicaBell.org
The most common way to do this is for everyone to stay in one group and discuss
and critique possible solutions. This stage
is messy. Sometimes people will suggest
new ideas, while others will critique current
or each agenda time follow this simple, proposals.
three-step process: get the information out,
track solutions, then make decisions. Lets
During this discussion you should be doing
explore these three points.
a few key things:
Its
your job to keep everyone on track. Let
one person go off topic and soon others will
stray. If someone goes off topic I let them
finish and then say lets deal with that later.
Right now lets focus on this topic.
JessicaBell.org
JessicaBell.org
JessicaBell.org
Anderson, M., Anderson, SR, L., Laeger-Hagemeister, M., Scheffert, DR. (1999) Volume 6 Dealing with Group Conflict Hubert H. Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs and
the University of Minnesota Extension Service, Minnesota, MN.
Anderson, M., Anderson, SR, L., Laeger-Hagemeister, M., Scheffert, DR. (1999) Volume 7 Utilizing Diversity, Power, and Ethics Hubert H. Humphrey Institute for Public
Affairs and the University of Minnesota Extension Service, Minnesota, MN.
Bens, I (2005) Advanced Facilitation Strategies: Tools and Techniques to Master Difficult Situations, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA
Bens, I (2012) Facilitating with Ease! Core Skills for Facilitators, Team Leaders and
Members, Managers, Consultants, and Trainers Ed 3. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Freeman, J (1970) The Tyranny of Structurelessness Online at: http://www.jofreeman.
com/joreen/tyranny.htm
Ghais, S (2005) Extreme facilitation : guiding groups through controversy and complexity Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Hogan, C (2002) Understanding Facilitation: Theory and Principles Kogan Page, London, UK
Hogan, C (2003) Practical Facilitation: A Toolkit of Techniques Kogan Page, London,
UK
Kaner, S (2003) Facilitators Guide to Participatory Decision-Making New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC. Pp18-19, 47-91, and 123-136.
Lakey, B, Lakey G, Napier, R & Robinson, J (1995) Grassroots and Nonprofit Leadership: A Guide for Organizations in Changing Times, New Society Publishers, BC. Pp
64-80.
Polleta, F (2002) Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il
NOTES
JessicaBell.org