Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/224089987
CITATIONS
READS
2 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Muhammad Younus Javed
National University of Science and Technology
281 PUBLICATIONS 728 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
BACKGROUND
METHODOLOGY
252
Input
Image
Classification
Preprocessing
Distance
calculation
Processing using
gabor filter
Creating
feature vectors
1 x 2 y 2
G ( x, y; , f ) = exp 2 + 2 cos( 2fx )
y
2 x
x = x cos + y sin
Input
Image
Preprocessing
Classification
Distance
Calculation
y = y cos x sin
Creating global
feature vectors
by combining
local features
253
HD =
IV.
1
N
( XOR)Y j
j =1
gabor
TABLE I.
0.0400
A. Experiment 1
In the first experiment, first three images of a class are
considered as training images and last four as testing images
[10]. The two approaches are experimented using the two types
of images. Table 1 shows the best results of this experiment for
both cases. Case I and II represent the cases where original
images and images with background subtraction are used
respectively. The number of gabor filters used within a bank
are also given. Threshold values that are used to separate the
true and false matches are also shown.
EER Line
EER
Multichannel Gabor
0.0500
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.0000
0.0000
0.0100
0.0200
0.0300
0.0400
0.0500
Number
of Filters
Method
Multichannel
gabor
Gabor
Multichannel
gabor
Gabor
II
Accuracy
(%)
B. Experiment 2
For the second experiment, the average image of first three
images is computed and used while computing the recognition
results [10]. And this average image along with the first three
images of a class is considered as training images. The last four
images of a class are treated as testing images. Table 2 shows
the best results for experiment 2.
Threshold
25
98.66
0.28
25
30
98.49
98.99
0.31
0.30
25
98.66
0.31
TABLE II.
RECOGNITION RESULTS FOR EXPERIMENT 2.
Case
I
multichannel gabor
gabor
II
99.50
Accuracy (%)
99.00
98.50
98.00
97.50
97.00
Case I
Case II
Method
Multichannel
gabor
gabor
Multichannel
gabor
gabor
Number
of Filters
Accuracy
(%)
Threshold
25
98.15
0.32
30
30
98.66
99.16
0.30
0.32
30
98.82
0.33
Methods
254
multichannel gabor
Gabor
gabor
99.50
100
Accuracy (%)
99.00
Accuracy (%)
Multichannel Gabor
98.50
98.00
97.50
97.00
Case I
98
96
94
92
90
Case II
15
Methods
20
25
30
35
Number of Filters
Figure 7. Best accuracy rates achieved in experiment 2.
Multichannel Gabor
EER Line
EER
VI.
0.0400
[1]
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.0000
0.0000
0.0100
0.0200
0.0300
0.0400
REFERENCES
CONCLUSION
255