Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Karen Dawson, P.E. & Sean Shin, Ph.D, P.E., CH2M HILL, Bellevue, WA, USA
Suthan Pooranampillai, Ph.D., AMEC E&I, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Dominic Parmantier, P.E., Condon Johnson & Associates, Inc., Kent, WA, USA
Presentation Overview
Description
Project
Subsurface Conditions
Design Considerations and
Methods
Construction
Layout
Equipment
Quality
Observations
Conclusions
Project Location
Subsurface Conditions
ML with occasional layers of MH,
CL, SM, and OL. Some gravel in
lower interbeds
Properties
PI = generally 0 to 15,
occasionally >20
Zones with organics (LOI up to 7%)
Cc = 0.14
c = 1.6 ft2/day
C = 0.005
pH = 4.5 and 5.9
Resistivity = 225 to 8200 -cm
Liquefiable under design 0.27 g
PGA
Roadway Features
Liquefiable soils
Maintain global stability during seismic event
Secondary benefit - Limit consolidation settlement of wall
Static long-term
Static construction (included preload)
Start of shaking
During shaking
Post shaking
Design Steps
1.
2.
3.
5.
Final Design
AR = 15%
10 month preload with 20% surcharge (additional criteria for
pavement: limit secondary compression to 2 in 15 years)
Instrumentation for settlement verification
AR = 15%
Minimum column diameter = 30
qt > 110 tsf or N60 > 24 for clean or already dense layers
Yield plots to verify stone volume
Additional explorations to define bearing layer
Test sections
Verify diameter and volume of stone in layered stratigraphy
Verify equipment response indicates bearing layer reached
Verify continuous stone by sonic coring
Bearing Layer
Verification
14 CPT
6 SPT
Total counting
owners
explorations ~
1 per 1,700 SF
Layout
Triangular with 8 spacing and 3.25 diameter columns
Triangular with 11 spacing and 3.5 diameter through
existing embankment
RV WALL
O-1
69
O-1
71
D-56
8 ft
P-17
0
8 ft
D-54
AREA C
E-55
R-16
9
R-17
1
F-54
AREA A
F-56
Test Area
2
AREA B
Test Are
a
CS WALL
Equipment
Manitowoc 4000 and 4100
crawler cranes
Dry bottom feed electric
probe (V23) 11.7 x 13.8,
2.4 tons, 34 tons dynamic
force
Observations
Vibrations:
Mostly < 0.5 ips
Peak vector sum = 1.1 ips
with probe working 7 from
gas main.
Observations
Clean core
Dirty core
Observations
10
Observations
Fines migration continued
Backcalculated c ignoring drainage to stone column
matches lab testing values and typical values in literature.
Laboratory average
cz = 1.6 ft2/day
Backcalc no radial drainage
cz = 1.5 to 2.0 ft2/day
Backcalc with drainage
cr ~ 0.5 ft2/day
cz ~ 0.05 ft2/day
Conclusions
1. Abundance of subsurface explorations is important for
planning and pay, especially in layered stratigraphy (1 per
2,000 SF+)
2. Automated data acquisition system is and excellent tool for
quality control, especially in silty soils with AR-based
performance
3. Rapid drainage through stone columns should not be
assumed.
11
Questions?
12