Professional Documents
Culture Documents
es)
Some Examples of Modeling in Chemical Engineering:
Thermal treatment of polymers, Phase equilibrium
calculations and Process design
PSE Seminar
Chemical Engineering Department
Center for Advanced Process Design-making (CAPD)
Carnegie
Mellon
University
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October,
2012.
Pittsburgh.
October, 2012. Pittsburgh (USA)
Outline
Analysis
Analysis and
and simulation
simulation of
of thermal
thermal treatments
treatments and
and thermal
thermal degradations
degradations
of
polymer
mixtures
of polymer mixtures
(kinetic modeling)
[CH2 CH2 ]n
7
Asymmetric
(n<1)
dQ/dT (J/gK)
6
5
Variation of heat
capacities with
temperature
4
3
dQ / dT e x p.
dQ / dT c a l .
dQ/dT
dQ
/ dT cwithout
a l . s i n Cp
ccontribution
o n tr i bu c i n de C p
2
1
0
50
100
150
T e m p e ra tu(C)
ra ( C )
Temperature
200
[CH 2 CH 2 ]n
CH 2
CH 3
C = O
CH m
TMAX = 49 C
2.5
TMAX = 72 C
dQ(dT (J/gK)
1.5
TMAX = 113C
1
0.5
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Temperature (C)
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
dQ/dT (J/gK)
10
0
-1 0
125
150
175
200
225
250
-2 0
d Q /d T e x p
-3 0
d Q /d T c a l
275
-4 0
-5 0
Temperature
(C)
T e m p e ra tu
ra ( C )
of
Applied
Polymer
Science
(2008)
107(1),
339-346.
6
TMAX = 49 C
k T, EVA
k M,EVA
EVA
EVA (T)
EVA (M)
k M, PE
PE
PE (M)
TMAX = 72 C
1.5
TMAX = 113C
1
0.5
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Temperature (C)
D S C P E p u ro
7
6
D S C A g e n t e E s p u m a n t e p u ro
dQ / dT e x p.
5
4
3
dQ / dT c a l .
20
dQ / dT c a l . s i n
c o n tr i bu c i n de C p
10
dQ/dT (J/gK)
dQ/dT (J/gK)
dQ(dT (J/gK)
2.5
2
1
0
50
100
150
T e m p e ra t u ra ( C )
200
315
330
345
360
375
390
405
dQ/dT (J/gK)
175
200
225
250
275
d Q /d T e x p
d Q /d T c a l
T e m p e ra t u ra ( C )
(r.1)
(r.2)
(r.3)
(r.4)
(r.5)
(r.6)
420
435
450
465
480
495
510
525
-2
-4
CA (TBPPB)
-6
150
-3 0
-5 0
0
300
125
-2 0
-4 0
k D ,CA
CA
s D ,CA R D ,CA + (1 s D ,CA ) G D ,CA
0
-1 0
540
Auto-accelerating
effect
-8
-10
-14
Temperature (K)
C P = (a T 2 + b T + c
H j dw j
dQ j
dw
k
Ea j 1
1
= H j j =
= H j ref , j w nj exp
dT
dT
H dt
H
R T Tref
i
DSC
dQ DSC
dQ m
m
O.F. =
m =1 i = 1
dT
dT
calc .
exp .
O.F.
RSD(%) =
(N P ) 100
D exp . av .
2
Vinyl acetate
domains
dQ/dT (J/gK)
pure PE
1.5
3
p3
2
Ethylene
domains
0.5
ADC
p1+p2
2.5
0
300
325
350
375
Auto-accelerating
effect
400
425
450
Temperature (K)
475
500
525
550
DSC results (1st runs) for the mixtures studied with various ADC contents:1, 2 and 4 phr.
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
1.75
EP(10)C(3)A(2)Z(1.5) cal.
EP(10)C(3)A(2)Z(1.5) exp.
Contribution EVA(M)
Contribution EVA(T)
Contribution PE(M)
Contribution CpS
Contribution CpM
ADC decomposition
CA decomposition
EVA(M)
EVA(T)
Reyes-Labarta
and
Marcilla.
I&ECR (2012)
51(28), 951589530.
http://dx.doi.org
/10.1021/ie300
6935
dQ/dT (J/gK)
Ethylene domains
1.25
0.75
CpM
CpS
PE(M)
0.25
-0.25
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
ADC
475
500
525
550
CA
-0.75
Temperature (K)
10
EVA
0.8
ADC
Weight fraction
Evolution
of the
weight
lost
along the
process
0.7
0.6
Two decomposition
reactions
One reaction
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Multiple decomposition
reactions
0.1
0
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
Temperature (K)
Experimental TGA curves for the pure components: CA (TBPPB), ADC (azodicarbonamide), EVA and PE
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
11
k DP1
EVA
s DP1 EVA * + (1 s DP1 ) G DP1
k DP2
EVA * + PE
s DP2 R DP2 + (1 s DP2 ) G DP2
ADC thermal decomposition:
2 H4N4C2O2 H6N4C2O2 + 2 HNCO + N2
2 H4N4C2O2 H3N3C2O2 + 2 HNCO + NH3 + N2
H4N4C2O2 + 2 HNCO H4N4C2O2(HNCO)2*
H4N4C2O2(HNCO)2* H6N4C2O2 + N2 +2 CO
H3N3C2O2 Gr.5
H6N4C2O2 Gr.6
(r.1)
(r.2)
(r.3)
(r.4)
(r.5)
(r.6)
k D ,CA
CA
s D ,CA R D ,CA + (1 s D ,CA ) G D ,CA
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
12
dw
ED
TGA
dw PE
dw PE dw R
=
+
dt
dt
dt
DP 2
TGA
dw R
dw
dw CA
= CA +
dt
dt
dt
D , CA
n-order kinetics
dw
= (1 s DP 2 ) PE = (1 s DP 2 ) k DP 2 w nPE
dt
and Arrhenius
type behaviour
DP 2
Ea
dw
n
= (1 s D,CA ) CA = (1 s D,CA ) k ref , D ,CA w CA
exp
dt
R
D , CA
dw TGA
dw ADC dw R
ADC
=
+
dt
dt
dt
*
DP 2
D , ADC*
) dwdt
= 1 s D , ADC
*
D , CA
1 1
T Tr
D , ADC *
n D , ADC*
13
0.9
EVA
0.8
EP(10)C(1.5)A(1)Z(1.5)
Weight fraction
0.7
EP(10)C(1.5)A(2)Z(1.5)
0.6
0.995
EP(10)C(1.5)A(4)Z(1.5)
0.99
0.5
0.985
0.98
0.4
0.975
0.97
0.3
0.965
0.96
0.2
0.955
0.95
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0.1
0
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
Temperature (K)
Experimental TGA curves for the mixtures studied with various ADC contents: 1, 2 and 4 phr
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
14
1,2
TG Exp. 5 K/min
0,8
TG COMBUSTION
TG cal. 5K/min
1,2
w/wo
TG Exp. 10K/min
TG Cal. 10 K/min
0,6
TG Exp. 25 K/min
1
TG Cal. 25 K/min
0,4
TG Exp. 5 K/min
0,8
TG cal. 5K/min
TG Exp. 10K/min
w/wo
0,2
TG Cal. 10 K/min
0,6
TG Exp. 25 K/min
0
200
TG Cal. 25 K/min
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0,4
Temperature (C)
0,2
0
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
Temperature (C)
15
Marcilla
et
al.
JAAP
(2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(03)00036-6
k2
EVA*
G2
k4
v
EVA* + c C
(1 + c) EVA*C
G3 + c C
k
dt
dt
dt
dt
dt
dt
dt
dt
dEVA *
dEVA
n
= k 1EVA
= sk 1EVA n k 2 EVA * k v EVA * C n
dt
dt
dC
dEVA * C
*
n
* n
= ck v EVA C + ck 4 EVA C
= (1 + c )k v EVA * C n (1 + c )k 4 EVA * C n
dt
dt
initial amount
E 1 1
k 3 Co
ref
n3
n2
n3
n3
K F + Co
constant
16
Sample 1
100
Different
amount
of catalyst
We ight loss (% )
80
40 K/min-9.33% M CM -41, exp .
40 K/min-9.33% M CM -41, cal.
60
40
20
0
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
TG curves at two heating rates and for the thermal and catalytic processes
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
17
Calculation
Calculationof
ofphase
phaseequilibrium
equilibrium(complex
(complexsystems:
systems:LV,
LV,LL,
LL,LS,
LS,LLS,
LLS,LLSh)
LLSh)
9 Typical problems in complex LL and LLS equilibrium calculations
9 Topology of the Gibbs energy of mixing function
9 New strategies for coherent and simultaneous correlation
9 Empirical equations
9 Multicomponent LLE and non-ideal LVE
9 Applications: Optimal design of separation processes: distillation column and LL
extraction sequences, calculation of distillation boundaries
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
18
E
M
C
G
M
A
M
GM
RT
TYPICAL
TYPICALPROBLEMS
PROBLEMSLLE!!
LLE!!
F
H
GM
RT
xI i
xIIi
xIi
xi
xIIi
Global Mixture
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
19
Water (B)
Organic
Solvent
(A)
Solid
Inog.
Salt
Tangent
Planes
Solid
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
Solid
20
Inog.
Salt
Solid
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
21
1L
2L
1L+1S
2L+1S
2 common points
Tie line
Water (B)
Tangent planes to
the GM surface
Tie line
Organic
Solvent
(A)
Tie
Triangle
Inog.
Salt
3 common points
Only 1 tangent
point each plane
Solid
Solid
Solid
Solid
Solid
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
22
NEW
NEWSTRATEGIES
STRATEGIESto
toavoid
avoidtypical
typicalconvergence
convergenceproblems
problems
Limit the equilibrium composition space for the LLE root determination
a) Using the second derivative of the GM function
gM
Advantages:
9 Less time consuming
9 Trivial solution is avoided
g M
x1
g
x12
2
II
x1
0
-
xI1
x1B
x1
Minimum common
tangent
23
Determinant of the
Hessian matrix of
the GM function
(=0)
L
pp
LL
Limit the equilibrium composition space for the LLE root determination
c1) Using a geometrical approach very good approximation to the ELL solution
(sequential series of minor cutting planes)
PREVIOUS
TIE -LINE
MAXIMUM DISTANCE
PLANE -SURFACE
ESTIMATED
TIE -LINE
x2
x3
Plane generation points
25
NEW STRATEGIES
tie-triang le
LL
a
L
LL
LLL
c
LL
c2) Using a geometrical approach very good approximation to the LLLE solution
Marcilla et al. Fluid Phase Equilibria 281, 87-95 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2009.04.005
(sequential series of
minor cutting planes)
26
A ij < f(A ji )
Homogeneous (L)
LL
2000
A ij > f(A ji )
Heterogeneous (LL)
1000
Aij
-1000
MISCIBLE (1L)
PARCIALLY MISCIBLE
-2000
-2500
-1500
-500
500
1500
2500
3500
Aji
27
M
c
S
L
G overall
G S G M liquid
i
=
+
= s
+ (1 s ) xL
i
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
i =1
1L+1S
-0,5
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
-0,6
Goverall
-0,55
-0,65
-0,7
-0,75
-0,8
(2001).
28
NEW STRATEGIES
Different objective functions
2
3
a) Isoactivity criterium O.F .(a) = (aiI aiII ) = 0
i =1
M
c
S
L
G overall
G S G M liquid
i
=
+
= s
+ (1 s ) xL
i
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
i =1
-0,5
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
-0,55
-0,6
Goverall
-0,65
-0,7
-0,75
-0,8
Objective function
8.0E-05
7.0E-05
-12
O.F.(a)<10^-12
O.F. (a) < 10
O.F.=O.F.(a)+O.F.(t)
6.0E-05
5.0E-05
a, b
I, II
liquid phases of
a potential tie line
4.0E-05
3.0E-05
2.0E-05
1.0E-05
I
0.0E+00
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.16
3.17
3.18
3.19
a-angle
II
29
TL
1
Experimental Data
0,9
Calculated by NRTL method
0,8
0,6
0,5
0,3
0,6
x NaCl
0,7
0,4
0,7
Experimental
0,8
x NaCl
Water(1) +
Ethanol (2) +
NaCl (3) at 25C
0,9
0,2
0,1
0,5
0,4
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
x Ethanol
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
x Acetone
Water(1) +
1-Buranol (2) +
LiCl (3) at 25C
30
0,2
31
Dimethyl sulfoxide
2
0,0
0,0
0,1
0,1
TYPE 0
T=20C
1,0
0,9
0,2
0,2
TYPE III
0,8
0,3
0, 3
0,7
0,4
0,4
0,6
0,6
0,7
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,5
0,5
experimental (
calculated (
0,4
0,3
0,8
0,8
0,2
0,9
0,9
0,1
1,0
1,0
0,0
water
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1,0
Tetrahydrofuran
32
Inconsistent
Reyes-Labarta et al.
Fluid Phase Equilibria
278,
9-14
(2009).
http://hdl.handle.net
/10045/24683
Consistent
33
LIMITATIONS
LIMITATIONSOF
OFTHE
THEACTUAL
ACTUALMODELS
MODELS
Illustrating example of a clear limitation for NRTL (constant alpha)
gM
min = 0. 40
-0.5
0.2
0.4
-1.5
gM
0.6
0.8
gap
-2.5
-3.5
-4.5
-5.5
x2
gM
min = 0 . 45
-0.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
gM
-1.5
-2.5
-3.5
(with ij =0.2)
-4.5
-5.5
x2
If we realize a systematic study on the GM function for a totally miscible binary system,
there exist a GAP where solutions for homogeneous binary behavior are not found.
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
34
experimental data
0.045
0.040
0.035
x2
0.030
0.025
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A12=873.57
=0.2
A21=-1245.0
=4.08
x3
A13=578.07
A31=578.07
opposite slopes!
A23=-987.32
A32=-856.11
35
T(x,y)
Selected VLE
data point
Calculated
VLE data point
120
100
80
A12 = -53.57 K
A12 = -136.05
=3.0
=2.8
A21 = 293.90 K
1 data
60
Vcal
Lexp
Vexp
40
A21 = 402.92
20
0
0
GM,V
=
RT
y ln p (T) + y ln y
0.2
d(GM,L / RT )
dx1
GM,L / RT
o
i
0.6
0.8
Lexp
= 2.47
x exp
x exp
0.4
x,y
= 0.65
GM liq
GM
gap
There is no
solution
(NRTL)
Vcal
Vexp
GMliq
DECHEMA
GM vapor
36
A21
(cal/mol)
-13,0045
1872,0758
0,2803
619,3422
2708,5773
0,6185
294,7832
1893,5152
0,4276
152,5084
1866,3369
0,3747
412,0253
1735,4304
0,4465
444,3339
1997,5504
0,4850
152,5084
1866,3369
0,3747
Type
3+type5
37
38
But
ButWhat
Whatcan
canwe
wedo
doininthe
themeanwhile?
meanwhile?
A) Possible modification for NRTL model:
GE
= Fi x i
RT
i
ji
ji
xj
G x
li
-3.000
-0.5
-3.200
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-3.5
-4
-1
The
Theinitial
initialGAP
GAPisiscompleted!
completed!
-2.98
-0.25
-1.5
-0.22
-2
gM
-0.35
-2.5
-0.38
Experimental
Experimentaldata
data
correlation
is
correlation is
considerably
considerablyimproved
improved
for
several
systems,
for several systems,even
even
island
islandtypes!
types!
-0.4
-3
-0.500
-3.5
-1
-1.5
-4
-2
-4.5
x1
-2.5
-2.8
39
Organic phase
(y)
Aqueous phase
(x)
and are the composition (components i,j,k) and transformed enthalpy (l) of vapor and liquid phase,
respectively, and C=cte.
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
40
2
2
x '4
x'4 x'2
+ g k , p + hk , p + ik , p log
x '2
x'2 x'1
y ' (3)
= k1
log
y ' (2)
y ' ( 4)
= k3
log
y ' (3)
y ' (2)
= k 2
log
y ' (1)
y ' (i ) = y (i ) + C
41
xi
xi
c
yi =
a i ,j x j
j =1
xq
q =1
a q ,j x j
j =1
yi =
c 1
j i
j i
j i
x i + a i , j x j + a i ,c 1+ j x i x j + a i , 2 c 2 + j x j x j+1
c
xq
q =1
x q + a q , j x j + a q ,c 1+ j x q x j + a q , 2 c 2 + j x j x j+1
c 1
j i
j q
j q
where xi and yi are the composition of the conjugated liquid and vapour
phases in equilibrium, and the subscripts i,j and q refer to the different
component of the mixture. ai,j represent the correlation parameters of the
equation, which are independent of the composition. Such parameters must
be obtained by correlation of the experimental data.
Marcilla et al. VIII Iberoamerican Conference on Phase Equilibria and Fluid Properties for Process Design
(2009). http://hdl.handle.net/10045/14276
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
42
T = T0 + Ti
3
i =1
xi
ai , j x j
T = T0 + Ti
i =1
j =1
xi
c
c 1
j i
j i
j i
xi + ai , j x j + ai ,c 1+ j xi x j + ai ,2c 2 + j x j x j +1
T
T
(x1,az , x 2 ,az )
(
)
x
,
x
1, az
2 , az
x 22
x 2 x 1
43
dT
(x az ) = 0
dx 1
Binary azeotropes:
2T
(x1,az , x 2 ,az ) > 0
x 12
2T
(x1,az , x 2 ,az ) < 0
x 12
2
T (x 1,az , x 2 ,az ) T (x 1,az , x 2 ,az )
x 2 x 1
x 22
44
GOAL: to
avoid the
optimal
design of
distillation
columns by
repeated
simulations
45
FOR
THE
DESIGN
OF
0.9
yeq
diagonal
Eq.pisos
BM-Roperat.
XD,XB
R.Op.1
R.Op.2
R.Op.3
0.8
0.7
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.4
0
0
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
x
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
GOAL:
to
simplify
the
rigorous
calculation
of
the
minimum
reflux ratio
47
Marcilla
et
al.
IEC&R,
38(8),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie9900723
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
3083-3095
(1999).
48
R0
EL2
EL1
Final Extract
Product
E1
ELn-1
Initial Solvent Feed
ELn=E0
E2
1
R0,ext
n-1
2
R1
Initial
Raffinate
Feed
RLk,byp
Rdef
Final
Raffinate
Product
Bypass
R0,byp
Side
Reyes-Labarta & Grossmann,
Side
Product
AIChE 47(10), 2243-2252 (2001).
Feed
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690 RLk Streams
PL Streams
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh. q
471011
49
E11
EL1n1-1
E1o
1
R1o
n1-1
n1
R1n1
Rdef
R2n2
R2o
1
E21
n2-1
n2
E2o
EL21
EL2n2-1
The selection of the stages in the optimal extraction cascade will be performed
using the following stage existence disjunction.
existing stage
Ej
Ej+1
equili
Rj-1
j
brium
Rj
Ej= Ej+1
Rj-1= Rj
Z j
x j ,c = x j 1,c ; y j ,c = y j +1,c
E j = E j +1,c ; E j ,c = E j +1,c
Zj
PLq , j = 0 ; PLq , j ,c = 0
EL j = 0 ; EL j ,c = 0
j NT
c COMP
k K
q Q
F {R, E, PLq,
RLk, EL, Rdef}
u = {x or y}
Z j Z j 1
52
53
E
E
A
E
E B
B
A
Last V-Lhet
point
V-Lhet Curve
PP
. .
LLV
Heterogeneous
azeotropic
binary
LL
Solubility
surface
x,y
Heterogeneous
lquids at boiling
temperature
55
AB12min
0.8
Acetone (2)
AB23min
0.6
0.4
ATmin
0.2
AB13min
-0.2
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
M ethanol (1)
0.8
1.2
*
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
56
y0
x1
y1
y2
x3
y3
x4
57
Mathematical algorithm:
X2,k (k=1,2,nipt)
Stable node
*
*
trajectory to test
x1,kcal=f(x2)
-^
ycal1,k
Singular points
Compositions: x2,k(k=1,2,,nipt)
i,k
Unstable
node
*
X1,k(k=1,2,, nincs)
Compositions: xcal1,k(k=1,2,,nipt)
Compositions: yeq1,k(k=1,2,,nipt)
Compositions: ycal1,k(k=1,2,,nipt)
ycal1,k=yceq1,k?
y1,kcal=f(y2)
yes
End
no
New values for parameters Aj or (cs nodes: x1,k k=1,2,, nincs)
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
58
1,00
0,90
0,90
0,80
0,80
0,70
0,70
0,60
0,60
x2
x2
0,50
0,50
0,40
0,40
0,30
0,30
0,20
0,20
0,10
0,10
0,00
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
x1
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
0,00
0,00
1,00
0,10
0,20
0,40
0,50
x1
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
1,00
1,00
1,00
0,90
0,90
0,80
0,80
0,70
0,70
0,60
0,60
X2
x2
0,30
0,50
0,50
0,40
0,40
0,30
0,30
0,20
0,20
0,10
0,10
0,00
0,00
0,20
0,40
x1
0,60
0,80
1,00
0,00
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
X1
0,90
1,00
59
1,00
0,90
0,90
0,80
0,80
0,70
0,70
0,60
0,60
X2
x2
1,00
0,50
0,50
0,40
0,40
0,30
0,30
0,20
0,20
0,10
0,10
0,00
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
0,00
0,00
1,00
0,20
0,40
x1
0,90
0,90
0,80
0,80
0,70
0,70
0,60
0,60
0,50
0,40
0,30
0,30
0,20
0,20
0,10
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
x1
1,00
0,50
0,40
0,10
0,80
1,00
X2
x2
0,00
0,00
0,60
X1
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
1,00
0,00
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
X1
60
0.8
Isopropanol
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Benzene
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
61
Quaternary Distillation
Boundary (surface)
Quaternary Distillation
Boundary (curve)
BA1,2
Ternary Distillation
Boundary (curve)
Methanol
(2)
i-propanol (3)
BA3,4
Water
(4)
The quaternary distillation boundary curve is formed by the two different distillation
boundary surfaces, that intersect in one curve.
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
62
Simulation-optimization
Simulation-optimizationapproaches
approachesfor
forprocess
processdesign
design
9 Optimal design of generalized distillation columns
n=i
(low pressure)
Reyes-Labarta
et
al.
AIChE
Meeting
Ln,RS
2012.
https://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2012/webprogram/Paper267732.html
p-H
V1,SS
cond
Comp
QD
Ws
F
Reb
QR
-QIHT
SS
IHE
RS
Ln,RS
(high pressure)
QIHT
63
Generalized
Generalizedscheme
schemeof
ofaadistillation
distillationcolumn
column
n=i
Lk,n(=Lk,NTk)
(Lk+1,0)
Vk,n+1-(VGFk)
(LGFk)
Multiple side streams (feeds,
products or intermediate
heat exchangers)
Juan A. Reyes-Labarta. PSE Seminar, CAPD-CMU. October, 2012. Pittsburgh.
Lk,n+1
Vk,n+2
k= k (or k+1)
64
65
Water-Ammonia
Water-AmmoniaAbsorption
AbsorptionCycle
Cycle
The problem is mathematically formulated as a multi-objective mixedinteger non-linear programming (moMINLP) problem (that simultaneously
accounts the minimization of the total annualized cost and the total
environmental performance of the cycle)
min z = { f1(x, u, xD ),..., fn (x, u, xD )}
xD
s.t.
hI (x, u, xD ) = 0
hE (x, u, xD ) = 0
gE (x, u, xD ) 0
66
Brunet, R. et al.
Computers
and
Chemical
Engineering, 2012,
46,
205-216.
http://hdl.handle.net/
10045/24678
67
Environmental
Impact category
Unit
Steam [kg]
Electricity [kWh]
Steel [m2]
Carcinogencis
Points/Unit
1.1810-4
4.3610-4
7.8310-1
Climate change
Points/Unit
1.6010-3
3.6110-6
1.70
Ionising radiation
Points/Unit
1.1310-3
8.2410-4
3.3010-2
Ozone depletion
Points/Unit
2.1010-6
1.2110-4
1.0010-3
Respiratory effects
Points/Unit
7.8710-7
1.3510-6
10.2
Acidification
Points/Unit
1.2110-4
2.8110-4
1.24
1.6710-4
2.40
Ecotoxicity
Points/Unit
2.8010-3
Land occupation
Points/Unit
8.5810-5
4.6810-4
3.1110-1
Fossil fuels
Points/Unit
1.2510-2
1.2010-3
8.64
10
Mineral extraction
Points/Unit
8.8210-6
5.7010-6
9.1110-1
68
69
LD+D
n=1
LD
Distillate
Possible
Heat
Integration!!
...
Feed
...
n=N
Residue
(bottom)
QQR
B
70
QD
L 1, 0
yQE
Q E1
s1
D,xD
s2
yF
QE
xopt,F
2
F2
s3
3
QB
B,xB
xB
xF
zF
yQE
xD
71
QD
D
D,xD
L 1, 0
s1
yF
xopt,F
s2
F1
F
2
s3
QA
A2
B
QB
B,xB
xB
xQA xF
zF
xD
72
General
Generalrepresentation
representationof
ofan
aninternally
internallyheat-integrated
heat-integrateddistillation
distillationcolumn
column
QD
L 1, 0+ D
D,xD
L 1, 0
(high pressure)
Rectifying sector
(light components)
Q E1
Internal
Heat
Integration
2
F2
3
(low pressure)
Q
4
QB
A3
Stripping sector
(heavy components)
B,xB
73
General
Generalconfiguration
configurationof
ofan
aninternally
internallyheat-integrated
heat-integrateddistillation
distillationcolumn
column
EV
(low pressure)
Ln,RS
p-H
V1,SS
cond
Comp
QD
Ws
F
Reb
Stripping
SS
Sector
Q
QRB
RB
-QIHT
Rectifying
RS Sector
IHE
Ln,RS
(high pressure)
QIHT
PSO algorithm
74
It is possible
to optimize the TAC!!!
QD
QR
WS
2000
But
the
solution
depends strongly
on the cost of the
electricity
and
the
system studied, purity
of the final products,
etc.!!
Q (kW)
1500
1000
500
200
400
600
800
1000 1200
QIHT (kW)
1400
1600
1800
2000
75
General
Generalconfiguration
configurationof
ofaavapour
vapourrecompression
recompressiondistillation
distillationcolumn
column(VRC)
(VRC)
p-cond
EV
R=L1,0
Qp-cond
D
Qp-H
cond
p-H
F1
Ws
(high pressure)
Comp
QIHT
F2
(low pressure)
Reb
76
77
78
Marcilla, A.; Reyes, J. A.; Sempere, F. J. DSC Kinetic Study of the Transitions Involved in the Thermal
Treatment of Polymers. Methodological Considerations. Polymer, 2001, 42(12), 5343-5350
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00925-3)
Marcilla, A.; Gmez, A.; Reyes, J. A. MCM-41 Catalytic Pyrolysis of Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymers.
Kinetic Model. Polymer, 2001, 49(19), 8103-8111(http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00277-4)
Reyes, J. A.; Conesa, J. A.; Marcilla, A. Pyrolysis and combustion of polycoated cartons recycling. kinetic
model and ms analysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2001, 58-59, 747-763
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00123-6)
Sempere, J. Estudio de los Procesos de Reticulado, Espumado y Descomposicin Trmica de
Formulaciones Industriales de Copolmeros de EVA y PE. Anlisis Cintico . Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de
Cervantes (Universidad de Alicante), 2003.
http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/FichaObra.html?Ref=9612
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/10130
79
80
-Reyes, J.A.; Olaya, M.M.; Gmez, A.; Marcilla, A. Calculation of liquid-vapor and liquid-liquid equilibrium
in multicomponent systems using correlations of equilibrium data. V Iberoamerican Conference on Phase
Equilibria and Fluid Properties for Process Design. EQUIFASE 99 Book of Abstracts.
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/2687
-Olaya, M.M.; Reyes-Labarta, J.A.; Serrano, M.D.; Marcilla, A. Vapor-Liquid Equilibria using the Gibbs
Energy and the Common Tangent Plane Criterion. Chemical Engineering Education 44(3), 236-244 (2010).
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/24677
-Olaya, M.M.; Ibarra, I.; Reyes-Labarta, J.A.; Serrano, M.D.; Marcilla, A. Computing Liquid-Liquid Phase
Equilibria: An exercise to understand the nature of false solutions and how to avoid them. Chemical
Engineering Education 41 (3), 218-224 (2007). http://hdl.handle.net/10045/14277
-Gmez, A.; Ruiz, F.; Marcilla, A.;Reyes, J.; Menargues, S. Diseo de la separacin de mezclas ternarias
(I). Conceptos grficos del equilibrio entre fases . Ingeniera Qumica, 377, 219-229 (2001).
-Gmez, A.; Ruiz, F.; Marcilla, A.;Reyes, J.; Menargues, S. Diseo de la separacin de mezclas ternarias
(II). Aplicacin de conceptos grficos a la separacin de mezclas azeotrpicas. Ingeniera Qumica, 379,
253-262 (2001).
-Marcilla, A.; Olaya, M.M.; Reyes, J.; Gmez, A. Graphical analysis of the phase equilibria diagram. V
Iberoamerican Conference on Phase Equilibria and Fluid Properties for Process Design. EQUIFASE 99
Book of Proceedings, pag. : 3 10. Vigo (Espaa), 1999 (http://hdl.handle.net/10045/2482).
81
82
7946(01)80076-6
83
84
Any question?
85