Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.ijafrc.org
www.ijafrc.org
), !" $ *
0, &( )! (
(1)
where popt is the desired percentage of CHs, r is the count of current round, G is the set of sensor nodes
that have not been elected as CHs in the last 1/popt rounds. The residual energy of each node per round
is given by following equation
Eavg(r) = 1/ 3
24
2(
(2)
In heterogeneous WSNs, the reference value of each node should be different according to the initial
energy and Pi is replace with different weighted probability of residual energy. The distance vector for
each node is given by
8(1)
7
? 7
8(2)
6
> 6
68(3)> 6
6 . > =6
6 . > 6
6 . > 6
58(<)= 5
(1, <)
?
(2, <)
>
(3, <) >
>
>
>
(<, <)=
(3)
www.ijafrc.org
8!
7
8!
6
68!
=6
6
6
58!
&B<C( D(&)((<
&B<C( D(&)((<
&B<C( D(&)((<
.
.
.
&B<C( D(&)((<
(1)B< A
?
(2)B< A
>
(3)B< A >
>
>
>
(<)B< A =
(4)
Hence the net distance from Base station is calculated by following equation
8A (1) 8(1)
8A (1)
7
? 7
? 7
?
8A (2) 8(2)
8A (2)
6
> 6
> 6
>
6 8A (3)> 68(3)> 68A (3)>
.
.
6
> =6 . > + 6
>
.
.
.
6
> 6
> 6
>
.
.
6
> 6 . > 6
>
5 8A (<)= 58(<)= 58A (<)=
(5)
Now the cluster head is elected by NDBS(i)= min ( NDBS(1)+ NDBS(2)+ NDBS(3)......+ NDBS(n)).
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this section we have evaluated the performance of our protocol using ns-2 simulator. We perform two
experiments, a network of 100 nodes deployed uniformly over 100 x 100 m2 and in second 200 sensors
over 200 x 200 m2 area.MAC layer communication links are assumed.
Different performance Characteristics analyzed in paper is PDR (Packet delivery ratio), Delay, control
overhead, normalized overhead, average energy consumption, jitter and throughput. Some important
graphs are shown in figure 1 Nodes Vs Average energy consumptions and figure 2 Nodes Vs throughput
etc.
V. CONCLUSION
In this paper we have proposed a new Efficient Clustering protocols for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor
Network(ECPHN) in which a new cluster head selection method using residual energy, average energy
and distance from the base station is used .Energy Efficiency of Wireless Sensor network depends upon
Cluster head selection .Simulation results shows that the performance characteristics using new cluster
head selection method improved the M-EECP over S-EECP using new ECPHN protocol, and thus
maximize the overall lifetime of Heterogeneous wireless sensor network.
www.ijafrc.org
Akkaya, K., Younis, M.: A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks, Elsevier Ad
Hoc Netw. J., 2005, 3, (3), pp. 325349
[2]
Manfredi, S.: Reliable and energy-efficient cooperative routing algorithm for wireless monitoring
systems, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2012, 2, (2), pp. 128135
[3]
[4]
Abbasi, A.A., Younis, M.: A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks, Elsevier
Comput. Commun., 2007, 30, (1415), pp. 28262841
[5]
Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Francescoa, M.D., Passarella, A.: Energy conservation in wireless sensor
networks, Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. J., 2009, 7, (3), pp. 537568
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Dilip Kumar, Performance analysis of energy efficient clustering protocols for maximising
lifetime of wireless sensor networks ,Published in IET Wireless Sensor Systems Received on
22nd November 2012 Revised on 29th May 2013 Accepted on 11th June 2013 doi: 10.1049/ietwss.2012.0150
[10]
Biswas, P.K., Phoha, S.: Self-organizing sensor networks for integrated target surveillance. Proc.
Int. Conf. Local Computer networks, August 2006, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 10331047
[11]
Szewczyk, R., Osterweil, E., Polastre, J., Hamilton, M., Mainwaring, A., Estrin, D.: Habitat
monitoring with sensor networks, Commun. ACM, 2004, 47, (6), pp. 3440
www.ijafrc.org