Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Centre of Micro- and Nanomechanics, School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland, UK
Timoshenko Institute of Mechanics, 3 Nesterov Street, Kiev 03057, Ukraine
a r t i c l e i n f o
abstract
A strongly non-linear dynamic problem of thermomechanics for multilayer beams is formulated based
on the KirchhoffLove hypotheses. In the case of harmonic loading, a simplied formulation is given
using a single-frequency approximation and the concept of complex moduli to characterise the nonlinear cyclic properties of the material. As an example, the problem of forced vibrations and dissipative
heating of a roller-supported layered beam containing piezoactive layers is solved. Different aspects of
thermal, mechanical and electric responses to the mechanical and electric excitations are addressed.
Dissipative heating due to electromechanical losses in the three-layer beam with piezoelectric layers is
studied. It is assumed that the structure fails if the temperature exceeds the Curie point for
piezoceramics. Using this criterion, the fatigue life of the structure is estimated. Limitations of the
approximate monoharmonic approach are also specied.
& 2011 Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY license.
Keywords:
Forced vibrations
Piezoelectric material
Complex moduli
Layered thin-wall structure
Roller-supported beam
Fatigue life
1. Introduction
The forced vibration analysis of structures occupies a signicant place in the dynamics of deformable systems. An accurate
prediction of the dynamic response is a serious challenge, since
the material of a structure may exhibit rather complex inelastic
properties under intensive loading. Variable elasticviscoplastic
behaviour should be studied when designing metal dampers for
the vibrations of building structures under wind and seismic
loads, devices for suppressing vibrations of pipelines, vibration
control systems, test specimens in low-cycle fatigue tests, etc.
The stringent requirements to modern complex devices have
recently compelled many researchers to pay attention to the
modelling and control of vibrations of thin-wall structures [14].
The rapid development of modern technology necessitates a
change from the traditional methods of vibration control to new
methods that allow the implementation of more complex and
highly effective operating modes, while taking proper account of
numerous life and reliability criteria. Modern structures and
devices are required to withstand higher level loads and new
patterns of loading. As a result, the modelling of the vibration of
structures and their members and the investigations of possibilities for controlling them have gained a new impetus.
106
107
108
of the complex moduli in the most natural way. Having introduced the real (storage moduli) and imaginary (loss moduli) parts
of the mechanical, dielectric and piezoelectric moduli, it is
possible to account for the mechanical, dielectric and piezoelectric losses and operate with the ideas inherent in the singlefrequency (monoharmonic) approximation.
Detailed information about the single-frequency (monoharmonic) approach can be found in [18]. The equations of the
simplied model are briey discussed below.
s~ kk 3KV e~ kk
For cyclically stable materials, it has been shown [22] that
even when the material behaviour is severely non-linear, vibrations with the frequency of the exciting load develop after some
transition period. Moreover, in several such cases we may neglect
the contribution of higher harmonics to the amplitudes of the
eld variables, and consider only the rst harmonic [22]. In such a
case, one can use all the advantages of classical or modied
monoharmonic approaches [18] employing the complex moduli
concept. Originally, this technique was applied to linear viscoelasticity [23], then with some modications to non-linear viscoelasticity and plasticity [18].
The model is based on the concept of complex moduli, which
are determined by a modied technique of equivalent linearisation [18]. In terms of these moduli, the initial problem is reduced
to a scleronomous system of equations for complex amplitudes of
mechanical and electrical variables: displacements, stresses, total
and inelastic strains, electric eld and electric displacement.
Equations of the simplest version of the model for monophase
loading are given below.
Within the simplied model, we assume that when elements
of a solid are under harmonic loading
00
the response of the stress and inelastic strain are also nearly
harmonic:
00
00
epkl t ep0
cos otepkl sin ot
kl
where ekl and skl are the deviators of the strain and stress tensors,
respectively, ( )0 and ( )00 are the real and imaginary parts of
complex amplitudes, U U0 iU00 and o is the frequency of
vibration. We determine the intensities of the effective deviatoric
strain ei, deviatoric stress si and inelastic strain epi as follows:
ei
i1=2
00 00
1 0 0
2eij eij eij eij
si
00 00
1 0 0
2sij sij sij sij
i1=2
00
00
i1=2
3
The procedure of harmonic linearisation assumes that complex
00
amplitudes of the strain deviator e~ ij e0ij ieij , inelastic strain
00
p
p0
p00
deviator e~ ij eij ieij and the stress deviator s~ ij s0ij isij are
0
~
~
related by means of a complex shear modulus G, G G iG00
00
and inelasticity factor k~ p , k~ p k0p ikp , according to [12,13,18],
such that
s~ ij 2G~ e~ ij ,
e~ pij k~ p e~ ij
00
y
M
Piezoelectric layers
O
h3
h2
k~ p k~ p ei , o,T
h1
L
Aluminium alloy layer
s~ xx C~ 11 e~ xx pH~ 31 D~ z , E~ z pH~ 31 e~ xx B~ 33 D~ z
10
where
s
~ ~D ~ ~D
~
C~ 11 c~ D
11 A 1 c 12 A 2 c 13 =D ,
s
B~ 33
s
~,
b~ 33 A~ 3 h~ 31 A~ 4 h~ 33 =D
~D 2
~D
A~ 1 c~ D
12 c 33 c 13 ,
~
~ s h~ 31 A~ 1 h~ 31 A~ 2 h~ 33 =D
H
31
~D ~D ~D
A~ 2 c~ D
12 c 13 c 13 c 11 ,
~ ~D
A~ 4 h~ 31 c~ D
13 h 33 c 11
and coefcient p is equal to 1, if the prepolarisation vector
coincides with the positive direction of the z-axis, and is equal
to 1 otherwise.
When using the monoharmonic approach, we have to conne
ourselves to the theory of geometrically linear theory of beams.
Otherwise the higher harmonics have to be taken into consideration. If we move to complex analogues of the displacements
~ v,
~ w)
~ and other kinematic parameters of the beam, then the
(u,
strain at an arbitrary point in the beam is expressed in terms of
the deformation parameters of its axis as follows:
e~ xx e~ zk~
11
12
where
V~
~ zs j
~ zs1 ,
j
n~
zs
~ 31 dz,
H
~
m
zs1
zs
~ 31 zdz,
H
~l
zs1
zs1
s
B~ 33 dz
zs1
~
~
n~ n0 in00 3KV 2G=6K
V 2G
14
~ K~ 1 e~ D
~ 1 k~ M
~E
M
15
K 1 n
K~ 1
C1
C 1 n
C1 , K1
s
s
~
~
sa
sp
sa
sp
l
l
!
X s
X
~ s
s m
~1
~ s m
~ ,
~
D
D
D
1
1
s
~l
sa
sp
X n~ s
X m
~ s
~ E
N~ E
, M
s s
s s
~
~
sa ~l V
sa ~l V
and indices sa and sp stand for electrically active and passive
layers, respectively.
The amplitude relations, Eq. (15), between the force and
kinematic parameters correspond to the relations from paper
[9] for the particular case of a layered beam vibrating at the
steady-state monoharmonic frequency of the exciting load. Comparison of the structures of the relations shows that those from
paper [9] contain neither the terms due to inelastic material
response in the explicit form nor those due to the geometrical
non-linearity. Non-linear geometrically induced terms are absent
due to the linearised nature of the monoharmonic approach, see
Eq. (11), while inelasticity of the material response is taken into
account by the complex characteristics (moduli) in Eq. (15). The
piezoelectric effect manifests itself through the electrically
~ E in Eq. (15).
induced forces N~ E and moments M
In the general case, the problem statement for the beam also
includes the complex-value analogues of the vibration equations
~ x ro2 hu~ 0,
N,
zs
109
~ 0
Q~ , x ro2 hw
16
amplitude expressions for components of the deformation parameters of the beam axis
~ x;
e~ u,
k~ W~ , x ;
~ x
W~ w,
17
~ x Q~ ;
M,
~ 0;
Q~ , x ro2 hw
W~ , x k~
Making use of Eq. (15), one can nally obtain the system in the
following form:
~ x W~ ;
w,
~ x Q~ ;
M,
~ 0;
Q~ , x ro2 hw
~ M
~ E
W~ , x Q~ S M
18
~ 1 K~ 2 .
where Q~ S C~ 1 =C~ 1 D
1
In this paper we consider two types of loading. The rst type
(mechanical loading) is the loading by moments applied to the
ends x 0, L and varying with time according to the harmonic law
M M0 sin ot, where M0 is the amplitude and o is the frequency.
The second type (electrical loading) is an electric potential
difference V(s) applied to each piezoactive layer and varying with
time as V s V0s sin ot, where V0s is an amplitude of voltage at
the electrodes of the sth layer.
The loading and boundary conditions should also be rewritten
in the complex form. It is easy to obtain for the mechanical
~ iM0 at x0, L, and for the electrical loading
loading M
s
V~ iV0s at the electrodes of piezoactive layers. Hence, the
boundary conditions for mechanical and electrical loadings take
110
~ M
~ 0 ; x 0,L and w
~ 0; x 0,L,
~ 0, M
~ 0, M
the form w
respectively. For the latter case, the excitation is introduced into
~ E.
the system via electrically induced moment, M
19
20
21
Here y and D are again used to denote the averaged temperature and dissipation, respectively.
The dissipation function for the piezoactive layer can be
written as follows [22]:
i
o h
~
D0 x,z Im s~ xx e~ xx E~ z D
z
2
where the complex conjugate quantities are marked with an
asterisk. Taking account of the amplitude constitutive relations,
the nal form of the expression for the averaged dissipation
function for the piezoactive layer becomes
D0 D0M D0DE D0PE
2
00 00
0
D0z e0xx Dz exx
oH31
00
00
2
C11 e02
xx exx
o
2
00
00
2
BS33 D02
z Dz
22
o
2
Ims~ xx e~ xx
o
2
00
00
23
Also, the convective heat transfer exchange with the environment happens on each beam face. The corresponding boundary
conditions have the following form:
7ky, x ax y,
x 0,L;
7 ky, z az y,
z 8 h=2
D0
0.5 105 MPa, c33
1.25 105 MPa, h310 5.0 108 V/m, h330
S0
1.8 109 MPa and b33 1.33 108 m/F. The loss tangents for
D00
D0
D00
D0
the PZT are tan dc11 c11
=c11
0.0128, tan dc12 c12
=c12
0.0144,
00
00
00
D
D0
D
D0
tan dc13 c13
=c13
0.02, tan dc33 c33
=c33
0.015, tan dh31 h31 =h031
00
s00
s0
0
0.0125, tan dh33 h33 =h33 0.0142 and tan db33 b33 =b33
0.0215.
The complex moduli for aluminium alloy are computed using
the technique suggested in [18], where the detailed procedure is
described. A one-dimensional version of the BodnerPartom
model [16,17] is used to simulate the response of the material
under tensioncompression for the excitation frequency ranging
from 1 to 100 Hz. It has been found that complex moduli exhibit a
week dependence on the frequency in this range and therefore
can be considered frequency-independent in the present study.
For the simplied model adopted here, the volumetric modulus, KV, is a real quantity and was taken to be 8.5 104 MPa. The
elastic Young modulus and Poisson coefcient for the material
were E0.816 105 MPa and n 0.34, respectively.
Dependencies of the storage modulus, E0 , and the loss modulus, E00 , as well as 9k~ 9 on the amplitude of strain, e0, are shown in
Fig. 2. The region of the elastic behaviour of the aluminium alloy
is clearly observed for values of the controlled parameter e0 below
0.3%. Typical for metals, the maximum in loss modulus occurs
at 0.72%.
For temperatures below the Curie point for piezoceramics,
which is the region of our main interest, the complex moduli for
aluminium alloy exhibit a weak dependence on the temperature
and, therefore, can be considered as temperature independent quantities for the present work. Manufacturers provide
different data for the Curie point, TC, ranging from 150 to 350 1C
depending on the PZT type and composition. In the present
investigation, it is chosen to be equal to 200 1C, and therefore,
in terms of the temperature increase yC TC T0 180 1C. Also, the
following parameters were used to solve the heat conduction
1
8.0
E
E"
0.8
6.0
|
0.6
|
| |
4.0
0.4
2.0
0.2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0
0.04
Fig. 2. Dependency of storage modulus, E0 , (solid line), loss modulus, E00 , (dashed
line) and magnitude of inelasticity coefcient ,9k~ 9, (dash-dot line) on the
amplitude of strain, e0, for the aluminium alloy.
111
112
0.12
f =35 Hz
f =35 Hz
300
0.1
MPa
200
xx|,
0.06
0.2 10
M =2.0kN m
0.2 10
|w|, m
0.08
0.04
M =2.0kN m
0.02
0
100
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.02
10
20
30
40
50
0.02
10
20
f, Hz
0.8
f =35 Hz
50
f =35 Hz
|I|, A
0.6
0.4
1.0
p
xx|,
40
0.8
M =2.0kN m
0.6
30
f, Hz
0.2 10
0.4
0.2 10
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
M =2.0kN m
1.0
0.5
0.2
0.02
0.02
10
20
30
40
f, Hz
50
10
20
30
40
50
f, Hz
Fig. 3. Amplitudefrequency characteristics of the forced vibrations of the beam under mechanical excitation: amplitudes of the beam central point deection
(a); amplitudes of stress (b) and inelastic strain (c) at points x 1 m and z 0.28 10 1 m; amplitude of the electric current from the upper piezolayer (d). Direct solutions
of the problem using the complete model are shown by the markers.
Fig. 5(b) give the frequency values. Far away from the resonance
region, the metal layer deforms elastically and does not contribute to heating over the vibration period. In this case, the energy
losses (mechanical, piezoelectric and dielectric) occur in the
piezoelectric layers only; see Fig. 5(a). The situation changes
dramatically if even a small inelastic strain appears in the metal
layer (Fig. 5(b)). Then the mechanical losses in the metal dominate. The maximal losses occur at the central cross-section in the
regions adjacent to the piezoceramics. The dissipation gradually
decreases to zero in the vicinity of the beam axis where the
material still deforms elastically. Analysis of Fig. 5(b) shows that
inelastic deformation plays a dual role in the vibration of the
considered highly non-linear system. First, it limits the amplitude
of the beam deection and, as a result, the amplitudes of the main
eld variables (stress, total and inelastic strain) as well as the
amplitude of the electric current taken from the piezoelectric
layer. This can be seen as a positive fact in some applications.
Second, the presence of inelastic strain generates signicant loss
of mechanical energy that, being dissipated as heat, leads to an
appreciable temperature rise. For a large number of cycles, this
can cause an overheating of the piezoceramics and deterioration
of their piezoelectric properties.
To study the latter effect, the heating time histories for the
beam are computed. It is worth mentioning here that the beam of
the considered lay-up is the most effective one from an engineering point of view. It provides the best controllability of the
vibrations in the sense of their actuation or suppression and
113
0.03
0.02
z, m
0.01
0.4
x,
0.2
1.5
0
-0.02
| |, %
0.6
0.5
0.00
-0.01
0
0.02
-0.02
z, m
-0.03
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
D, MW/m3
0.03
0.5
31.5
31.3
31.1
20
0.02
f=32Hz
1.5
0
-0.02
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.02
z, m
Fig. 4. Distributions of total (a) and inelastic (b) strain amplitudes over the plane
Oxz at the frequency f 32 Hz and controlled parameter M0 1 kN m.
z, m
x, 1
m
| |, %
0.01
0.00
-0.01
-0.02
-0.03
100
200
300
400
500
D, MW/m
Fig. 5. Distributions of the dissipative function along the beam central crosssection for loading frequency f 10 Hz (a) and for the set of frequencies in the
resonance vicinity (b).
114
200
0.4
=180 C
32
31.4
31.33
150
31.323
31.32
0.3
32
a ,m
max,
31.3
100
36
34
0.2
31.2
50
0.1
31.1
20
f=10 Hz
1000
2000
3000
4000
100
200
N, cycles
300
400
N
0.35
300
220
0.3
160
200
, C
|I |, A
250
140
120
150
0.25
32
80
100
0.2
40
50
38
100
0.5
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
N, cycles
34
1
x, m
1.5
Fig. 8. Effect of depolarised zone width (a) and electric current amplitude (b) on
the number of cycles for several excitation frequencies.
115
200
f=32 Hz
150
31.32
31.30
max,
M0 , kN m
1.5
50
0.5
100
200 300
N
1000
1000
800
600
400
200
100
32
34
36
38
f, Hz
Fig. 10. Effect of Ny on the excitation frequency for controlled parameter
M0 1 kN m.
1000
2000
N, cycles
3000
4000
7. Conclusions
An approximate method for investigation of the non-linear
system response to harmonic loading is developed based on the
single-frequency approximation and the concept of complex
moduli. It is proved to be a powerful approach for determining
the amplitudes of the main mechanical and electrical variables as
well as the temperatures arising from dissipative heating for
116
Acknowledgements
The nancial support from the EPSRC (Grant EP/E030351/1),
the Royal Society, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the
Royal Society of Edinburgh is gratefully acknowledged. The
authors are very grateful to Prof. H.W. Chandler and
Dr. M. Kashtalyan (Centre for Micro- and Nanomechanics, University of Aberdeen) for the helpful discussions and suggestions,
which contributed to the improvement of the paper.
References
[1] B.P. Baillargeon, S.S. Vel, Exact solution for the vibration and active damping
of composite plates with piezoelectric shear actuators, J. Sound Vibr. 282
(2005) 781804.
[2] Y. Bao, H.S. Tzou, V.B. Venkayya, Analysis of non-linear piezothermoelastic
laminated beams with electric and temperature effects, J. Sound Vibr. 209
(1998) 505518.
[3] G.R. Liu, X.Q. Peng, K.Y. Lam, J. Tani, Vibration control simulation of laminated
composite plates with integrated piezoelectrics, J. Sound Vibr. 220 (1999)
827846.
[4] S.S. Rao, M. Sunar, Piezoelectricity and its use in disturbance sensing and
control of exible structures: a survey, Appl. Mech. Rev. 47 (1994) 113123.
[5] J. Tani, T. Takagi, J. Qui, Intelligent material systems: application of functional
materials, Appl. Mech. Rev. 51 (1998) 505521.
[6] S. Vidoli, F. dellIsola, Vibration control in plates by uniformly distributed PZT
actuators interconnected via electric networks, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 20
(2001) 435456.
[7] B.R. Nana Nbendjo, Amplitude control on hingedhinged beam using piezoelectric absorber: analytical and numerical explanation, Int. J. Non-Linear
Mech. 44 (2009) 704708.
[8] H.S. Tzou, R. Ye, Piezothermoelasticity and precision control of piezoelectric
systems: theory and nite element analysis, Trans ASME. J. Vibr. Acoust. 116
(1994) 489495.
[9] Y.A. Zhuk, I.A. Guz, Active damping of forced vibration of hinge-ended beam
containing piezoactive layers with account of geometrical and physical
nonlinearity, Int. Appl. Mech. 45 (2009) 94108.
[10] H. Irschik, F. Ziegler, Dynamic processes in structural thermoviscoplasticity,
Appl. Mech. Rev. 48 (1995) 301316.
[11] J.S. Yang, R.C. Batra, Free vibrations of a linear thermopiezoelectric body,
J. Therm. Stresses 18 (1995) 247262.
[12] Y.A. Zhuk, I.K. Senchenkov, Modelling the stationary vibrations and dissipative heating of thin-walled inelastic elements with piezoactive layers, Int.
Appl. Mech. 40 (2004) 546556.
[13] I.K. Senchenkov, V.G. Karnaukhov, Thermomechanical behavior of nonlinearly viscoelastic materials under harmonic loading, Int. Appl. Mech. 37
(2001) 14001432.
[14] A. Benjeddou, Advances in hybrid active-passive vibration and noise control
via piezoelectric and viscoelastic constrained layer treatments, J. Vibr. Contr.
7 (2001) 565602.
[15] J.-L. Chaboche, Cyclic viscoplastic constitutive equations. Part I. A thermodynamic consistent formulation, Trans. ASME. J. Appl. Mech. 60 (1993)
813821.
[16] K. Chan, S. Bodner, K. Walker, U. Lindholm, A survey of unied constitutive theories, in: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Nonlinear
Constitutive Relations for High Temperature Applications, Cleveland, Ohio,
1984, pp. 123.
[17] C.M. Sands, H.W. Chandler, I.A. Guz, Y.A. Zhuk, Extending the BodnerPartom
model to simulate the response of materials with extreme kinematic hardening, Arch. Appl. Mech. 80 (2010) 161173.
[18] I.K. Senchenkov, Y.A. Zhuk, V.G. Karnaukhov, Modeling the thermomechanical behavior of physically nonlinear materials under monoharmonic loading,
Int. Appl. Mech. 40 (2004) 943969.
[19] L.P. Tran-Huu-Hue, P. Audrain, F. Levassort, M. Lethiecq, Inuence of the
different loss parameters on piezoelectric material performances, Ferroelectrics 224 (1999) 177184.
[20] M. Liu, E. Krempl, E. Nairn, An exponential stress-strain law for cyclic
plasticity, Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 43 (1976) 385394.
[21] E. Krempl, Viscoplastic models for high temperature applications, Int. J. Solids
Struct. 37 (2000) 279291.
[22] V.G. Karnaukhov, I.F. Kirichok, Coupled Problems in the Theory of Viscoelastic
Plates and Shells, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1986 (in Russian)(in Russian).
[23] R.M. Christensen, Theory of Viscoelasticity: An Introduction, Academic Press,
New York, 1971.
[24] I.A. Guz, Y. Zhuk, M. Kashtalyan, Vibration analysis of thin-wall structures
containing piezoactive layers, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 10 (2010) (paper
012174)(paper 012174).
[25] Y.A. Zhuk, I.A. Guz, C.M. Sands, Simplied monoharmonic approach to
investigation of forced vibrations of thin wall multilayer inelastic elements
with piezoactive layers under cyclic loading, Arch. Appl. Mech. 81 (2011)
215227.
[26] Y.A. Zhuk, I.A. Guz, C.M. Sands, Monoharmonic approximation in the vibration analysis of a sandwich beam containing piezoelectric layers under
mechanical or electrical loading, J. Sound Vibr., submitted for publication.