Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. Sounding Balloon
I. I NTRODUCTION
B. Quadrotor
Lately, more researchers have been working on the Quadrotor research project. A researcher at the University of Texas
at Arlington developed a Quadrotor which can automatically
loiter in the sky; The University of Tasmania and the Australian
Antarctic Division used the Quadrotor to monitor the moss
in the Antarctic. The Pixhawk used an algorithm to achieve
automatic ight control, which was exploited by the Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. The frontiers of the
Quadrotor knowledge are being expanded as time goes on.
Currently, sounding or UAV projects are popular elds.
However, it is unheard-of for anyone to combine both. For
one thing, the UAV is limited by ight height and ight
time, while the sounding balloon can y to an altitude of 2030 km, without considering ight time. For another, with a
sounding balloon, it is difcult to control the ight route, while
the UAV can control the ight direction. Through skillfully
combining both, we can send ight commands to the UAV
by smart phone to make it y to a safe location landing.
While maintaining the safety of the surrounding area, we can
achieve the goal of effective retrieval. The sounding project has
become increasingly popular in recent years; there is related
information on the Internet which even provides predictions
where the balloon will land. However, due to strong wind and
air ow, even if we have landing predictors, the error range
may still be as high as 10 km. In comparison with the West
which mostly comprises wide expanses of at land, Taiwan
is a small island with swift rivers and signicant differences
of altitude due to steep mountains. Moreover, Taiwan has a
well-developed transportation network. No matter whether the
equipment lands on railways, valleys or seas, retrieving the
equipment is difcult to implement. As a result, we combine
the sounding balloon with the UAV, and control the UAV by
phone. The properties of the UAV let it y to designated
and safe location landings with the equipment in its payload.
Despite Taiwan being a mountainous country surrounded by
sea, our project is not a dream.
Yes
Turn On
UAV
Altitude
Start
Balloon
Inflation
UAV
Take Off
Retrieve
Payload
Yes
Turn On
Application
Fig. 1.
Separate
Parachute
Separate
Balloon
Check
Equipment
Launch
No
Designated
Altitude
No
Data
Analyze
End
Monitor
TABLE I
THE WEIGHT OF MATERIALS
27
Material
Weight
Sounding Balloon
Parachute
UAV
Battery (UAV)
Payload
Smart phone
Arduino Uno
GoPro
852 g
270 g
1480 g
376 g
83 g
189 g
40 g
88 g
Total weight
3378 g
(1)
where air and He are the density of the air and helium,
respectively. V is the volume.
When the buoyancy is greater than the weight, it can carry
the equipment off the ground. We could choose the best
balloon according to this function (1).
2) Payload: Since the weight of the payload would inuence the endurance of the UAV, we chose lighter Styrofoam
as our payload. Because we had to resist the strong wind
in the troposphere, we needed a sophisticated design for our
payload. According to the calculation of the weights, we
chose the appropriate position of the goods. This offered the
payload equilibrium, and used Velcro to make it more solid.
Additionally, we put the camera at the bottom of the payload
so as to broaden the eld of vision. Furthermore, we used
the mobile power packs in order to increase the period of the
experiments. Figure 2 shows conguration of the payload:
Mobile power
pack
p
TABLE II
THE HARDWARE OF THE UAV
Material
Specs
Battery capacity
Battery size
Battery weight
Hardware
Firmware
GPS
Ground station
Remote control
Propellerl
Payload Capacity
Weight
Fight Time
GoPro
Velcro
Smartphone
Fig. 2.
Mobile
l power pack
FD =
(2)
(3)
Fig. 3.
28
The oscilloscope
S
Separate
Unlock
Land
Smart Phone
Arduino
Overall
Cloud Server
Streaming Video
Where is the UAV
User
Smart Phone
Fig. 4.
Ring
Overall conguration
(a)
Fig. 5.
29
(b)
E. Checking equipment
We needed to check if our application could be executed
during the experiment, take pictures and get sensor values at
every designated time. Most of all, we had to make sure that
the application could send commands to the UAV, order it to
y automatically, and land in a safe area. In addition, due
to high temperatures application work might lead to battery
degradation. When the temperature is above 45C during work,
it would degrade the application performance. Thus, we needed
to monitor the temperature of the battery in order to ensure
applications were working properly.
We also had to measure the weight of our equipment, the
buoyancy of balloon and check the efcacy of parachute before
the formal experiment.
After checking all of these elements, we needed some thin
strong cord to assemble the balloon, parachute, payload and
the UAV. We also applied some hooks to attach one thing to
another more rmly and made sure that all cords were strong
enough to support our equipment. The following gure is the
overview of the system:
Soun
Sounding
Balloon(Each)
Packing Material Helium
Pack
Wei
Weight 852 g
Payload Capacity 1220 g
Payl
Diam
Diameter 162 cm
Separating device
Bluethooth
Battery
B
atttery
UAV
Weight 14800 g
Flight Time 12 min
pacity 450 g
Payload Capacity
Parachu
Parachute
Weight 270
2 g
Surface Area 35947
Separating
S
eparating d
device
evice
Battery
P
Payload
W
Weight 898 g
C
Contains: Phone,
Arduino, GoPro 4,
A
M
Mobile power pack
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
30
Fig. 8.
Ground Station
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
R EFERENCES
[1] Global Space Balloon Challenge-http://www.balloonchallenge.org/.
[2] G. Mountrakis and D. Triantakonstantis, Inquiry-based learning in remote
sensing: A space balloon educational experiment, Journal of Geography
in Higher Education, pp. 385401, 2012.
[3] J. Blamont, Implications of the vega balloon results for atmospheric
dynamics, Science, vol. 231, pp. 14221425, March 1986.
[4] A. Behar, J. Matthews, C. Raymond, and E. Means, The jpl pause aerobot, in IEEE International Conference Systems, Man and Cybernetics,
vol. 4, pp. 39393943, October 2005.
[5] C. Raymond, Pause informal peer review., 2004.
[6] M. Verge, Pause aerobot ight software analysis and development.
Masters Thesis, International Space University, 2004.
[7] H. Lim, J. Park, D. Lee, and H. Kim, Build your own quadrotor:
Open-source projects on unmanned aerial vehicles, IEEE Robotics &
Automation Magazine, vol. 19, pp. 3345, September 2012.
[8] Efe and M.O., Neural network assisted computationally simple pid
control of a quadrotor uav, IEEE Transactions Industrial Informatics,
vol. 7, pp. 354361, May 2011.
[9] Z. Dydek, A. Annaswamy, and E. Lavretsky, Adaptive control of quadrotor uavs: A design trade study with ight evaluations, IEEE Transactions
Control Systems Technology, vol. 21, pp. 14001406, July 2013.
31