Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tribology International
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/triboint
a r t i c l e in fo
abstract
The corrosionerosion wear behaviors of austenitic stainless steels, 316L and 13Cr24Mn0.44N, were
investigated in watersand slurry and salinesand slurry, respectively. The corrosionerosion wear
mass-loss was measured to evaluate the inuence of medium and materials. The worn surface and
corrosionerosion wear mechanism were analyzed using a scanning electron microscopy and a noncontact optical prolometer. Results show that the corrosionerosion wear mass-loss of
13Cr24Mn0.44N is lower than that of 316L in both the slurries. The relative wear resistance increases
with the increasing of the impingement velocity and arrives at maximum of 1.6. The dominant wear
mechanism of 13Cr24Mn0.44N is abrasive wear in the watersand slurry, whereas it becomes abrasive
wear associated with little corrosive pitting in the salinesand slurry. As the impingement velocity
increased all the synergism ratios exhibit a tendency of increase, among which the synergism ratio of
13Cr24Mn0.44N is always lower than that of 316L at any given velocity. The results indicate that
13Cr24Mn0.44N possesses a predominant anti-corrosionerosion wear property.
& 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Stainless steel
Corrosionerosion wear
Wear mechanism
Synergism
1. Introduction
Austenitic stainless steels are widely used in many components where corrosion resistance is crucial, such as slurry
handling in food and chemical industries [1,2]. When used in
such elds, they often undergo tribocorrosion or mechanical
action of hard particles. Generally, the total metal removal is not
simply the sum of the corrosion and the wear measured in
separate experiments. The interaction of erosion with corrosion
could signicantly affect entire mass-loss due to the synergism
between mechanical and electrochemical effect. For example, if a
corrosive solution carries the particles, the surface damage due to
corrosion increases as a consequence of synergistic mechanisms
between corrosion and erosion [37]. The synergistic effect
between erosion and corrosion has been receiving more and
more attention in recent years. Many studies have showed that
corrosion is accelerated by wear and the wear may be also
accelerated by corrosion [812].
Recently high nitrogen stainless steels have been paid a special
attention due to its good combination of strength, ductility,
toughness, weldability, localized corrosion resistance and tribological properties [1316]. Particularly, it has been shown that
nitrogen additions improve the resistance to pitting and crevice
corrosion of stainless steels in solutions containing chloride ions
2. Experimental procedures
2.1. Materials and mediums
The 13Cr24Mn0.44N stainless steel used here was developed
by Shanghai Research Institute of Materials. The steel ingot was
rstly austenized at 1050 1C for 1 h, and then oil-quenched, and
lastly annealed at 850 1C for 1 h to relieve internal stresses. The
hardness of 13Cr24Mn0.44N, after annealing treatment, is about
197 HV. The rectangular specimens (20 mm 10 mm 2 mm)
were cut-out using electrical discharge method. It was ground
to an average surface roughness Ra of 1.6 mm. Reference experiment was also conducted with commercially used 316L stainless
ARTICLE IN PRESS
892
Table 1
Chemical compositions of the experimental materials (wt%).
Experimental
material
Mn
Si
Ni
Cr
Mo
Ti
13Cr24Mn0.44N
316L
e Ws =Wc
2.3. Characterization
M0 M
M0
DMc-w
Mcorr
Mcorr Mwater
Mcorr
DM0
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Zhou / Tribology International 43 (2010) 891896
893
Table 2
Relative wear resistance of 13Cr24Mn0.44N versus 316L in different slurries at
various velocities.
Slurry
100 (r/min)
500(r/min)
1000 (r/min)
Watersand
Salinesand
1.29
1.42
1.39
1.56
1.5
1.6
600
cps
(111)
400
(200)
(220)
200
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2/deg
Fig. 3. XRD spectrum pattern of 13Cr24Mn0.44N.
Fig. 4. Mass-loss ratios of 316L and 13Cr24Mn0.44N at various velocities: (a) in watersand slurry, (b) in salinesand slurry.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
894
all the cases due to the sharp SiO2 particles. The micro-cut slots of
13Cr24Mn0.44N were relatively narrower and smoother in the
watersand slurry as shown in Fig. 5(a); in contrast, additional
corrosive pitting and a little of wide deep ditches exhibited in
salinesand slurry probably caused by impacting hard particles,
as shown in Fig. 5(b). Therefore, the dominant wear mechanism of
13Cr24Mn0.44N is abrasive wear in the watersand slurry,
whereas it becomes abrasive wear associated with little
corrosive pitting in the salinesand slurry.
As for 316L, the dominant wear mechanism is also abrasive
wear in the watersand slurry. This can be veried by the SEM
photograph as shown in Fig. 5(c), from which many micro-cut
slots, as well as some impingement pits, were presented. By
Fig. 5 depicts the SEM images of the worn surface after erosion
wear in both the slurries at the velocity of 1000 r/min. Many
scratch lines along the direction of impingement were observed in
Table 3
Hardness (HV) after erosion wear in watersand slurry at various velocities.
Materials
100 (r/min)
500 (r/min)
1000 (r/min)
316L
13Cr24Mn0.44N
378.8
442.8
410.8
468.7
452.6
592.5
Table 4
Synergism ratio (Z) between corrosion and wear of experimental materials at
various velocities.
Materials
100 (r/min)
500 (r/min)
1000 (r/min)
316L
13Cr24Mn0.44N
0.21
0.15
0.29
0.20
0.34
0.28
Fig. 6. SEM image of the pitting hole of 316L after erosion in salinesand slurries
at 1000 r/min.
Fig. 5. SEM image of the surface after erosion in two slurries at high velocity: (a) 13Cr24Mn0.44N, in watersand slurry, (b) 13Cr24Mn0.44N, in salinesand slurry,
(c) 316L, in watersand slurry, (d) 316L, in salinesand slurry.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Zhou / Tribology International 43 (2010) 891896
895
Fig. 7. 3D-morphology of the wear scar: (a) plan form, (b) side elevation.
contrast, the remarkable pitting corrosion and brittle delamination took place on the surface when corrosionerosion wear
conducted in salinesand slurry, evidenced in Fig. 5(d). Fig. 6
illustrates the higher magnication SEM photograph of the pitting
hole after corrosionerosion in salinesand slurry. The presence of
plate-like hole in 316L indicated that the corrosive slurry was able
to pass though the surface and locally attack the substrate,
promoting formation of pits and reducing mechanical supporting
ability. The local weak corrosion surface can be continuously
removed by the action of the ow and the presence of solids;
therefore, the brittle delamination may ake from the surface of
the samples.
It is further evidenced by Fig. 7, which shows the 3Dmorphology of the cleaned surface of 316L stainless steel after
corrosion erosion in salinesand slurry. Obviously the 3Dmorphology (Fig. 7(a), observed from top) was similar to the
SEM image. However, some deep corrosion pittings presented in
another 3D-morphology (Fig. 7(b), observed from side). This
morphology can also demonstrate that 316L processes a poor
erosion wear resistance in salinesand slurry, compared with
13Cr24Mn0.44N.
4. Conclusions
The results of the present study on the corrosionerosion wear
behavior of a new stainless steel 13Cr24Mn0.44N, compared with
the commonly used 316L, in salinesand slurry and watersand
slurry, provides a new insight into the synergism between wear
and corrosion. The mass-loss ratio of 316L is always larger than
that of 13Cr24Mn0.44N whether in salinesand slurry or in
watersand slurry. The relative wear resistance increases with the
increasing of the impingement velocity and arrives at maximum
of 1.6. Both the stainless steels present a positive synergism
between wear and corrosion. As the impingement velocity
increased all the synergism ratios exhibit a tendency of increase,
among which the synergism ratio of 13Cr24Mn0.44N is always
lower than that of 316L at any given velocity. All above indicates a
predominant anti-corrosionerosion wear property of high-Mn
austenitic stainless steel. The dominant wear mechanism of
13Cr24Mn0.44N is abrasive wear in the watersand slurry,
whereas it becomes abrasive wear associated with little corrosive
pitting in the salinesand slurry. As for 316L, the dominant wear
mechanism is also abrasive wear in the watersand slurry,
whereas it becomes abrasive wear associated with corrosive
delamination fatigue in the salinesand slurry.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to acknowledge professor Q.X. Dai for
his help on the preparation of the experimental material.
References
[1] Jemmely P, Mischler S, Landolt D. Tribocorrosion behaviour of Fe-17Cr
stainless steel in acid and alkaline solution. Tribol Int 1999;32:295303.
[2] L0 opez D, S0 anchez C, Toro A. Corrosionerosion behavior of TiN-coated
stainless steels in aqueous slurries. Wear 2005;258:68492.
[3] Toro A, Sinatora A, Tanaka DK, Tschiptschin AP. Corrosionerosion of nitrogen
bearing martensitic stainless steels in seawater-quartz slurry. Wear
2001;250251:125764.
[4] L0 opez D, Congote JP, Cano JR, Toro A, Tschiptschin AP. Effect of particle
velocity and impact angle on the corrosionerosion of AISI 304 and AISI 420
stainless steels. Wear 2005;259:11824.
[5] Hu X, Neville1 A. The electrochemical response of stainless steels in liquid
solid impingement. Wear 2005;258:6418.
[6] Zheng YG, Yao ZM, Wei XY, Ke W. The synergistic effect between erosion and
corrosion in acidic slurry medium. Wear 1995;186187:55561.
[7] Recco AAC, Lopez D, Bevilacqua AF, da Silva F, Tschiptschin AP. Improvement
of the slurry erosion resistance of an austenitic stainless steel with
combinations of surface treatments: Nitriding and TiN coating. Surf Coat
Technol 2007;202:9937.
[8] Dahm KL. Direct observation of the interface during sliding tribo-corrosion.
Tribol Int 2007;40:15617.
[9] Lin MC, Chang LS, Lin HC, Yang CH, Lin KM. A study of high-speed slurry
erosion of NiCrBSi thermal-sprayed coating. Surf Coat Technol
2006;201:31938.
[10] Huang LY, Xu KW, Lu J, Guelorget B, Chen H. Nano-scratch and fretting wear
study of DLC coatings for biomedical application. Diamond Relat Mater
2001;10:144856.
[11] Neville A, Hodgkiess T, Dallas JT. A study of the erosioncorrosion behaviour
of engineering steels for marine pumping applications. Wear 1995;186
187:497507.
[12] Iwabuchi A, Lee JW, Uchidate M. Synergistic effect of fretting wear and sliding
wear of Co-alloy and Ti-alloy in Hanks solution. Wear 2007;263:492500.
[13] Toro A, Misiolek WZ, Tschiptschin AP. Correlations between microstructure
and surface properties in a high nitrogen martensitic stainless steel. Acta
Mater 2003;51:336374.
[14] Clayton CR, Halada GP, Kearns JR. Passivity of high-nitrogen stainless alloys:
the role of metal oxyanions and salt lms. Mater Sci Eng A 1995;198:13544.
[15] Tschiptschin AP, Garzo0 n CM, Lopez DM. The effect of nitrogen on the scratch
resistance of austenitic stainless steels. Tribol Int 2006;39:16774.
[16] Fu WT, Zheng YZ, He XK. Resistance of a high nitrogen austenitic steel to
cavitation erosion. Wear 2001;249:78891.
[17] L0 opez D, Falleiros NA, Tschiptschin AP. Corrosionerosion behaviour of
austenitic and martensitic high nitrogen stainless steels. Wear
2007;263:34754.
[18] Mills DJ, Knutsen RD. An investigation of the tribological behaviour of a highnitrogen CrMn austenitic stainless steel. Wear 1998;215:8390.
[19] Takahashi H, Shindo Y, Kinoshita H, Shibayama T, Ishiyama S, Fukaya K, Eto
M, Kusuhashi M, Hatakeyama T, Sato I. Mechanical properties and damage
behavior of non-magnetic high manganese austenitic steels. J Nucl Mater
1998;258263:164450.
[20] Dai Q, Yang R, Chen K. Deformation behavior of FeMnCrN austenitic steel.
Mater Charact 1999;42:216.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
896