Reality in Political Science

Be the change that you wish to see in the world.

Mahatma Gandhi

In my opinion, based on research of this fragment written by M. Roskin, R. Cord, J.

Medeiros and Walter Jones, entitled Political Science: An Introduction, it is presented to us and
revealed that we must be objective when we analyze a field of study, in this case: political
science. In our case, in political science, it is preferable to be objective, to look over impartial, to
try to see beyond prejudices, you do not analyze political man subjectively, but objectively, based
on facts, not on our opinions people. Of course it is preferable for a man to have moral qualities
like integrity, to be honest, to show compassion, to be trustworthy and flexible when it comes to
decisions for people.
First of all, the word integrity is defined as the adherence to moral and ethical principles;
the soundness of moral character. and it is a synonym for honesty and uprightness. It is a vital
characteristic for those in political leadership. Political leaders who possess integrity can be
trusted because he or she never veers from inner values, even when it might benefit them to do
so. A leader must have the trust of followers. This requires the highest standard of integrity.
Like integrity, being honest can sometimes be difficult because it makes individuals
vulnerable. It reveals who we really are and discloses our mistakes, which gives others the
opportunity to criticize or reject openly. Honesty develops character and builds credibility and
trust, which are the foundation to evoke confidence and respect from those around you and in the
case of political leaders, teammates and constituents.
Compassion is the humane quality of understanding the suffering of others and wanting
to do something to alleviate that suffering. While many see compassion as a weakness, true
compassion is a characteristic that converts knowledge to wisdom. Good political leaders use

compassion to see the needs of those he or she leads and to determine the course of action that
would be of greatest benefit to all those involved.
Another important trait for a political scientist when he analyzes a politician is whether or
not it shows confidence. Having confidence in a political leader is about having faith or belief
that he or she will act in a right, proper or effective way. A good political leader needs to be both
confident in himself or herself as well in their ability to lead. Leaders who possess this quality
inspire others, drawing on a level of trust which sparks the motivation to get others on board and
get the job done.
Flexibility for a political leader is about understanding the give-and-take aspects of
politics, and the ability to find the common ground. Good politicians listen carefully to all sides,
to not only hear their arguments but to especially learn what it will take on behalf of all parties
involved to reach a consensus. This characteristic allows political leaders to recognize setbacks
and criticism, to learn from them and move forward.
Second of all, a politician have to respect different views, to analyze problems with his
team and identify the best solutions, not based on loyalty to political party, but rather based on
what is good and right and in the best interest of the nation as a whole.
In conclusion, for a political scientist, it is primarily important to be objective, to be
rational and to offer the truth to the world. A political scientist do not have to tell what people
want to hear, but he is obliged to be moral, to write or to say what is real and with great
significance or value related to politics.