Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Charter School
January 29th, 2016
Major Modification Application
Table of Contents
Section A: Core Questions ....................................................................................................................... 3
1. What modification does the schools Board of Directors wish to make to the term(s) of the charter?
.................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2. What is the effective date of the proposed modification?................................................................... 3
3. Discuss the schools academic performance, compliance with the terms of its charter, and financial
viability as measured by the Performance Framework. ........................................................................... 3
4. Describe the rationale for the request. Discuss any relevant research-based or evidence that
supports this type of request. ................................................................................................................... 5
5. Describe how the proposed modification will impact the operation of the school. Include how
student achievement, staffing, facilities, and the financial viability of the school may be impacted in
the current school year and for the remainder of the schools charter term. ......................................... 7
6. Indicate the projected impact, if any, of the proposed modification on the schools present financial
position, and its financial position going forward. If the modification promises to create financial
challenges, indicate how those will be remedied..................................................................................... 8
Section H Questions .................................................................................................................................... 10
1. Please describe any challenges that the current school facility presents. If the modification is
approved, will it generate any new challenges and describe how you will address them. ................... 10
Challenges of Current Facility ............................................................................................................. 10
Challenges of New Facility .................................................................................................................. 12
2. Please describe the proposed location of the school. Include information about siting, space
available, costs to the school (and how they differ from the current facilities arrangement), safety, any
co-located programs sharing the same facility, the quality of the instructional and non-instructional
space and any other significant factors impacting the attractiveness and viability of the proposed
facility. ..................................................................................................................................................... 12
3. Describe the projected impact of the location modification on the schools program, mission,
culture and offerings (both academic and non-academic). .................................................................... 14
4. Articulate a facility usage plan for the school going forward. Will the proposed location solve space
needs for a limited amount of time or permanently? Will further modifications be required? ........... 14
Appendices (attached as separate files) ..................................................................................................... 15
1/29/16
Page 2 of 15
La Academia received a total evaluation score of 58, 23% higher than the first year
school target of 47. It had its highest results in the Culture & Character domain, a
critical component for the successful implementation of the instructional model.
1/29/16
Page 3 of 15
In the first Performance Framework report, La Academia met the standard for Financial
Performance which showed the school to be financially sound, even with the lower than
anticipated student count. The school made the necessary adjustments to ensure long
term financial viability by completing a major modification to reduce its long term
enrollment waterfall. The net effect of the modification was to postpone the achievement
of the schools original projected full enrollment by one year.
La Academia was rated as Does Not Meet the Standard for Organizational Framework.
As a result of the turnover in leadership that occurred at the school during the first year,
four areas were not met. Each of these areas is being addressed and carefully
monitored this year:
Measure 2 - Is the school meeting financial reporting and compliance
requirements?
The DOE noted lack of compliance with payroll procedures, posting on the
school web site, and two audit findings. The following actions have been
implemented:
o
o
o
A payroll internal control plan was developed and signed by the school
ISO and is pending approval by the state.
Currently the website is reviewed monthly and the board is notified of any
missing items for corrective compliance action.
The audit findings are being addressed as follows:
The financial statement compilation process will be strengthened for
the 2016 school year audit by ensuring (a) an earlier engagement of
the accounting firm, (b) that a reporting and discussion process is in
place prior to the issuance of the compiled financial statements to the
auditors, and (c) having Innovative Schools clearly establishing
expectations with the accounting firm regarding expected deliverables.
Innovative Schools is working with Academia Antonia Alonsos Board
Treasurer to ensure that all financial policies are appropriately
documented and approved by the Board. The Capitalization and
Depreciation policies mentioned in the findings were formally approved
by the Board at their October 2015 meeting.
1/29/16
Page 4 of 15
The school now has a part-time person to assist in the office to ensure
parents are being contacted and another part-time person who works with
families whose students are truant.
4. Describe the rationale for the request. Discuss any relevant researchbased or evidence that supports this type of request.
Rationale:
When the school initially applied to be part of the Community Education Building the
leadership anticipated being part of an innovative educational environment where
support resources could be shared and optimized. The mission of the CEB was to
establish an environment for tenants so that underserved city children could access
world class educational opportunities. In addition, a co-location with other successful
schools and an actively engaged landlord would enhance the likelihood of the success
for all schools in the building. With almost two years of actual experience in the
building, school leadership has identified a number of operating constraints that are
Academia Antonia Alonso Charter School
Major Modification Application
1/29/16
Page 5 of 15
impacting the ability to deliver against its charter commitments (further details are
provided in Section H, Question 1).
1. Long transition times as students move from its school floor, on the 6th floor of
the 11 story building, to other areas of the building and recess area, significantly
impact the time available during the school day for pedagogical initiatives.
2. Lack of access to the school facilities on evenings and weekends.
3. Lack of green space and safe, accessible, playground facilities.
4. Challenging logistics being in a collaboratively managed, shared building impairs
the schools ability to achieve its objectives.
After reviewing options of other potential locations, it was determined that a location that
can be conveniently accessed by families, can be managed directly by the school, and
also provides green space and playground facilities would be preferable to the current
location in enabling the school to deliver the educational outcomes that it is striving to
achieve.
Research-based evidence:
The National Association of Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) recommends
elementary school children have at least 20 minutes of recess daily1. The American
Academy of Pediatrics says play is essential to childrens development2. According to a
survey by the National Parent Teacher Association, 99 percent of parents and teachers
think recess is important for elementary students and 75 percent of parents say recess
should be mandatory3. And according to a Gallup Survey of Principals on School
Recess funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in 20094, eight of ten
principals say recess has a positive impact on academic learning. Two-thirds of
principals reported that students listen better after recess and are more focused in
class.
Recess has traditionally served as the one outlet during the school day when kids get to
recharge their bodies and their minds. The outdoor recess facility for La Academia is a
former blacktop parking lot that is a block and a half away from the building and takes a
minimum of 15 minutes to get to (and 15 minutes to return from) once the children leave
the classroom, walk down six flights of steps, or take the elevators, and walk along and
across traffic-heavy streets. The blacktop recess area lacks playground equipment and,
on occasion glass, syringes or other trash has been found on site. When the school
opts to have indoor recess (which, given the time and logistics, is more often than an
elementary school that has on-site recess facilities), the only area available in the
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED497155.pdf
http://www2.aap.org/pressroom/play-public.htm
3
http://www.peacefulplaygrounds.com/pdf/right-to-recess/national-pta-recess-at-risk.pdf
4
http://www.playworks.org/sites/default/files/d6/StateOfPlayFeb2010.pdf
2
1/29/16
Page 6 of 15
school for the kids is the Atrium, but that space is typically used for physical education
classes. Therefore, it is not available for recess.
Given that 61% of La Academias students live in the City of Wilmington zip codes of
19801, 19802 and 19805, the majority of the schools students live in neighborhoods
where they may be regularly exposed to violence and crime, and where their families do
not feel safe having their children play outside. This makes it even more important that
the school be able to offer the opportunity for these children to be able to have safe play
spaces. Unstructured play time has a positive impact on social development and
general well-being and allows children the opportunity to practice essential social skills,
which in turn improves learning and school climate.
5. Describe how the proposed modification will impact the operation of the
school. Include how student achievement, staffing, facilities, and the
financial viability of the school may be impacted in the current school year
and for the remainder of the schools charter term.
Student Achievement
Student achievement is expected to improve as a result of the reduction in lost
instructional time currently being experienced. In addition, the improved ability to
provide recess and physical education opportunities will improve concentration levels
for students which, in turn, will impact student achievement.
Staffing
Teaching staff is expected to grow to reflect both the core classroom staffing needs and
the potential special education needs. The current level of required special education
services is modest, and the proposed budget contemplates a growth in direct and
indirect support as the school grows into its 4th and 5th grades. The school has an
Operations Manager that will oversee the contractual relationships to be developed at
the site, and will also oversee Food Service compliance requirements. The school also
expects to receive additional custodial funding to support direct services needed at the
new site, most of which are currently provided by the CEB.
Facilities
The proposed modification would allow La Academia to operate as an independent
school, having its own building with only a ground and a 1st floor. This will minimize
current transition time concerns, and will allow the school team to optimize instructional
time, while fully managing its facility, operations, and academic initiatives. In addition to
having increased operating supports, La Academia will explore how best to leverage the
current infrastructure and operating supports that Odyssey Charter School has
implemented, with the intention to generate cost efficiencies for both schools.
Academia Antonia Alonso Charter School
Major Modification Application
1/29/16
Page 7 of 15
La Academia and Odyssey would negotiate an initial one-year lease, renewable for
multiple 5-year terms as soon as the former receives its Charter renewal from the DOE
during the 2017 school year.
The new facility at the intersection of Route 141 and Route 48 is 3.8 miles from its
current location, and immediately outside the city limits (DuPont Road in Wilmington).
Based on Odyssey data, all students will continue to be transportation eligible. We
believe that this new location will appeal to residents of New Castle County who live
outside of the City of Wilmington. La Academia will have access to green space at the
Barley Mill campus, which would enhance its ability to achieve its EL Education
experiences, and would be able to access two soccer fields across the schools parking
lot, or establish its own recreational/sports spaces on campus. The school could also
make available to students its own playground equipment.
Financial Viability
The move will have a positive impact on the financial viability of the school, since the
potential landlord has indicated that it will only charge rent on the actual space used for
425 students (40,000 square feet in SY 2017 versus the CEB rent commitment on
54,000 square feet of school space). Although the new rent is on a triple net basis
(NNN), the savings would more than offset the additional costs incurred for utilities and
other costs, such as maintenance, custodial services, and debt service.
With the proposed (a) change in location, and (b) end-state enrollment of 625 students
(within the 5% limit permissible in charter law), the long term financial viability of the
school is also strengthened as a result of increased revenues and rent/operating cost
savings. The proposed modification budget is presented in Appendix 2, Annual
Revenue sheets are presented in Appendix 3, and the Budget Narrative is presented in
Appendix 4.
1/29/16
Page 8 of 15
1/29/16
Page 9 of 15
Section H Questions
1. Please describe any challenges that the current school facility presents.
If the modification is approved, will it generate any new challenges and
describe how you will address them.
Challenges of Current Facility
Being located in the Community Education Building for the past two years, the school
has experienced many operating and pedagogical challenges resulting from the shared
space and the location. La Academias Board asked the school leader to prepare a
report regarding these challenges, which has been shared with the Board. The school
feels these challenges are negatively impacting the instructional day, as well as the
climate and culture of the school community. The following is a summary of the
challenges in the current facility as reported to the board:
The school has limited access to the building, which in turn means staff has
limited access to their school. The CEB has restricted building access to the
hours between 7am and 8pm, weekdays only. Despite having a dedicated group
of teachers and staff who want and sometimes have to work late and on
weekends, they are not permitted access to their classrooms or the building. This
lack of access to the school negatively impacts planning and delivery of high
quality instruction. When our board meeting ran a few minutes past 8:00 one
evening, we were presented with an invoice for this overage.
The size of, and school location in the building are causing a significant
loss of instructional time. Every time there is a transition off of the schools
floor which is on the 6th floor of the 11- story building, an average of 15 - 20
minutes are used round trip for the transitions (depending on whether students
use stairs or the elevator). Students need to transition for physical education
class, dance class, library, lunch and recess. Students transition off the floor a
minimum of 2 times each day, and when they go for recess it is 3 times. Our
school has students in grades K-2 who are young and small, and during
transitions they have to either navigate 2 to 6 flights of stairs or wait on elevators
that require the school to make multiple trips to transport everyone, depending on
the location of their next activity. We have had one incident of an elevator full of
students getting stuck for over 20 minutes. A second incident occurred with
Kuumba Academy students and staff. This has caused some of our students to
be afraid of the elevators. Some of our younger students have tripped on the
stairs, and now are afraid of using them.
1/29/16
Page 10 of 15
The school has no choice but to use the CEB as their School Food
Authority. While the CEB functioning as the School Food Authority has certain
administrative benefits and alleviates compliance requirements for the school,
these are outweighed by the logistics constraints that end up impacting school
and parent satisfaction. The school has no way to control adherence to posted
menus, the time at which our students must eat, or the number of students who
need to eat at one time. Although rectified since then, earlier in the year the
school experienced situations of meals not being ready on time, and food being
served that wasnt on the menu.
The school has limited ability to deliver proper physical education classes.
When the school initially leased the building, it was told the Atrium would be the
gym area. Over the past year we have been told balls are not to be used in the
Atrium where the Physical Education classes take place. The CEB has
suggested that the school could have utilized the Walnut Street YMCA for their
gym facilities last year, but due to the difficulty of transitioning 5 and 6 year olds
to the YMCA, which is 3 city blocks away from the school, we made the decision
to keep our students safely in the building. If another location is used for physical
education classes, such as the YMCA, the instructional minutes lost would
double with the additional transition distances.
To develop our unique Expeditionary Learning, bilingual school culture, and build
a strong sense of community, the school needs a facility that offers greater
control over critical factors.
1/29/16
Page 11 of 15
o The location of the school, and the challenges faced by the CEB to renew a
variance to shut down French Street between 12th and 13th during arrival
and dismissal, is a safety concern. There is limited space for school buses to
load and unload safely on French Street. For dismissal, the buses need to
double park on French Street, and cars drive by the double parked buses in
the opposite direction lane while cars going the other way are driving in the
same lane. This makes for unsafe conditions for all.
Challenges of New Facility
The school will have to develop and manage contracts for custodial services, facilities services,
building maintenance, etc. The school will have to manage and provide food service for the
students. As previously mentioned, La Academia currently has operations staff, and will hire
additional staff to ensure that all stand-alone facility management activities are successfully
delivered. In addition, given that this site will be a co-located site, La Academia leadership and
Innovative Schools representatives are in discussions with Odyssey to explore the benefit of
shared facilities and services at the Barley Mill campus. It is our collective belief that there will
be numerous opportunities to leverage services and jointly optimize/minimize the services/cost
equation across the schools. These issues are being addressed in the budget.
1/29/16
Page 12 of 15
feet between April and July 2016, following a similar work plan implemented by Odyssey
in 2015, with the balance being completed the following year so that the school can
comfortably expand over time to our proposed long-term enrollment of 630. The attached
proposed layout for phase 1 renovations has a number of offices that can be used for
pull-out services such as PT, OT, and RTI. The initial fit-out plan is attached as Appendix
5.
Please refer to Section A Core Question 6 (above) for facility related operating cost
information. The Odyssey facility team has been working with our architects and
engineers to estimate the cost of the proposed fit-out, incorporating all of the learnings
resulting from the repurposing of Building 22 for their expansion. Projected costs are
expected to be approximately $20 per square foot, or a total of $800,000. This investment
will be funded with a mix of a line of credit from M&T Bank, La Academias available cash
flow after summer pay encumbrances and 2% contingency, and funds available from
Odyssey for some basic infrastructure work.
La Academia will actively explore how to optimize shared services with Odyssey Charter
School, including, but not limited to, the potential use of their cafeteria services,
leveraging their base infrastructure and programmatic service structure (e.g. custodial,
transportation, janitorial etc.). Odyssey is already preparing meals at their central
cafeteria kitchen and delivering food to their middle school in Building 22.
The campus, although being on a 34-acre site, is self-contained, and quite secure with
minimal non-school traffic. La Academias leadership and Board will work closely with
Odysseys administration to continue enhancing a safe and secure environment for all
children.
One of the greatest advantages of the site is that the 60,000 square feet are distributed
over two floors (instead of being on the 6th and 7th floors of a high rise building),
immediately eliminating one of the greatest pedagogical constraints the school is currently
facing. In addition, having direct access to external green areas will enhance both the
recreational and educational activities for students.
The Board reviewed several locations, and by far, the Barley Mill campus was determined
to be the best one for La Academia to deliver both the academic and operational
commitments as presented in the schools original charter application.
La Academia has two short-term fallback sites it could consider. The first is the recently
vacated Delaware Met building, to be used for one transitional year. The second is the
Family Foundations Academy building in New Castle, to be vacated at the end of this
school year, as the school consolidates their student body in the recently acquired Reach
Academy buildings. This facility could be used for one or more years.
1/29/16
Page 13 of 15
4. Articulate a facility usage plan for the school going forward. Will the
proposed location solve space needs for a limited amount of time or
permanently? Will further modifications be required?
As mentioned above, the building will meet all the space requirements for the school to
expand to its modified maximum enrollment of 625 students in a K-5 configuration. With
31 total classrooms including 29 core classrooms and 2 additional classrooms to be
designed into the fully renovated building, the school will be able to retain its 1:22 teacher
to student ratio in grades K-2 and 1:25 in grades 3-5. To minimize the impact on the
schools budget, the retro-fit spend-out will occur in two phases (this spring and summer
of 2017), duplicating the fit-out strategy being implemented by Odyssey as it grows into
a high school. Phase one will give the school 20 classrooms and multiple offices and pull
out spaces, together with a nurses suite, and a library. The school will also have a
multipurpose room that can be used for a cafeteria, a gym and an auditorium. This will
meet the needs of the 425 students for 2016-2017.
This opportunity is a unique one for Academia Antonia Alonso since it will minimize
facility-related risks given that it is working closely with, and leveraging practically all of
Odyssey Charter Schools expansion experience (and strategies). In addition, La
Academia will be able to leverage the Odyssey core infrastructure of services.
1/29/16
Page 14 of 15
1/29/16
Page 15 of 15
4.
Determine the level of implementation of EL practices in your school and all EL schools,
Track growth of your schools implementation practices levels over time,
Provide standardized scores that allow individual schools and researchers to analyze the relationships
between level of implementation and other outcomes (e.g. growth in achievement, engagement,
motivation, etc.), and
Inform the work plan and professional development activities for your school and EL schools nationally.
While the official scores for your school are reflected in the School Designer score, school staff scores are analyzed
as they provide a valuable and critical contribution to the validation of the instrument (so that there is independent
confirmation that the instrument measures what it is supposed to measure).
The IR score is meant to be an accurate measure of the actual extent of implementation of 26 key EL practices in your
school, called the EL Power Practices. The Power Practices are essential components of the EL model that are hypothesized
to have an impact on student achievement either directly or indirectly. By establishing Power Practices, EL is not saying
that anything in our Core Practices is unimportant; rather, we are attempting to prioritize those aspects of our design that
we believe are most correlated with increased achievement.
Accompanying this letter are the following documents:
Table of Scores A numerical report showing Implementation Review scores for each power practice
Chart of Scores A bar chart showing Implementation Review scores for each power practice
IR Progress Report A visual report that indicates your schools overall raw score on a scale of targeted
outcomes for schools by length of partnership
An electronic copy of the Implementation Review Instrument
An important step in benefiting from these materials is to review each report carefully. The Individual School Chart
provides a graphical view of the score report. The scores for each Power Practice correspond to the individual rubric in the
IR Instrument, which is provided for your reference. Column 5 describes the exemplary implementation of that Power
Practice, and School Designers and school leadership teams should use this column to identify specific targets for work
plan goals and objectives. For Power Practices that a school is not implementing at an exemplary level, the IR instrument
and Core Practices can be used as tools to establish explicit goals for improvement.
The Progress Report provides an additional way of viewing your schools overall progress towards implementation of the
EL design and IR target score. The EL staff has identified IR score targets for each year of partnership, beginning with year
1 and ending with year 4 or higher. This report displays a graphic that shows your schools score in relation to its target
score and last years IR score (if applicable).
As you deepen your understanding of the Implementation Review instrument, we believe that you will gain new
insight into the power of this instrument as it relates to achieving your schools goals and documentation of progress
along the way. We appreciate your partnership and look forward to working with you on your annual work plan.
Respectfully,
The EL Implementation Review Research Team
Curriculum
Instruction
Assessment
Leadership
Practice
Score
2 Case Studies
6 Learning Expeditions
1 Effective Lessons
4 Culture of Reading
5 Culture of Writing
6 Culture of Mathematics
1 Learning Targets
3 Quality Assessments
1 Learning Community
2 Crew
3 Fostering Character
4 Engaging Families
5 Beautiful Spaces
1 School Vision
2 Using Data
5 Professional Learning
2
TOTAL
SCORE:
58
1
1
1
2
L5 Pr
of
es
s
i
onal
Lear
ni
ng
L4 Pos
i
t
i
v
eSc
hool
Cul
t
ur
e
L3 Suppor
t
i
ngPl
ann.
,As
s
ess.
,&I
nst
r
.
Cul
t
ur
e&Char
act
er
L2 Usi
ngDat
a
L1 School
Vi
si
on
1
3
CC5 Beaut
i
f
ul
Spaces
CC4 Engagi
ngFami
l
i
es
CC3 Fos
t
er
i
ngChar
act
er
Assessment
CC2 Cr
ew
CC1 Communi
t
yofLear
ni
ng
A5 Anal
yz
i
ngAs
s
es
smentDat
a
A4 Communi
c
at
i
ngSt
udentAch.
A3 Qual
i
t
yAs
ses
sment
s
I
nst
r
uct
i
on
A2 AssessmentForLear
ni
ng (
AFL)
A1 Lear
ni
ngTar
get
s
I
7I
nt
egr
at
i
ngt
heAr
t
s
I
6 Cul
t
ur
eofMat
hemat
i
cs
I
5 Cul
t
ur
eofWr
i
t
i
ng
I
4 Cul
t
ur
eofReadi
ng
Cur
r
i
cul
um
I
3 Ref
l
ect
i
ng&St
r
uct
ur
i
ngRevi
si
on
I
2 Suppor
t
i
ngAl
l
St
udent
s
I
1 Ef
f
ect
i
veLes
sons
C6 Lear
ni
ngExpedi
t
i
ons
C4 Pr
oj
ec
t
s&Pr
oduct
s
C2 Cas
eSt
udi
es
C1 Mappi
ngSki
l
l
s&Cont
ent
TOTAL
SCORE
YEARS
OF
PARTNERSHIP
+9
85 - 130
Year 1 Target:
47
48 - 66
Year 2 Target:
66
TARGET SCORE: 47
26 - 47
Year 3 Target:
84
67 84
Year 4 Target:
98
58
1
APPENDIX2
I
State & Local Revenue
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
State Appropriations
Other State ~l;!fO!;!riations
6
7
8
9
11
Classroom Teachers
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
---
II
II
II
$3,655,666 1
I
2015 -2016
10
24
25
26
27
Year1
2015 -2016
S2,090,458 '------S88,941
S1 ,199,345 - - S276,922
Year 2
2016-2017
S2.654,100 S116,307 - - S1,575,802 - - S93,385
r-1
2016-2017
S769,123
so
so
so
S168,376
S4,067
$40,000
so
S7,773
S14.234
S58,875
so
so
$323,834 - - S180,219 - - so , - - - -
16.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
$1 566 500
Student Support
Transeortation
Extra Curricular Transoortation
Cafeteria
Extra Curricular
Su~elies and Materials
Textbooks
Curriculum {Exeeditiona~ Learning~
Professional Develoement
Assessments
Parent and Communitv Enaaaement
Theraeists (Occueational , Seeech}
Classroom Technology
School Climate
Comeuters
Contracted Services
Other/Student Activities
$279,400
so
S578
so
S62,042
so
S25,065
$4,785
so
so
S50,000
S20,000
so
S20,000
S222,500
S26,220
$710,590
2017-201~ L_____j
II
2017-2018
S900,000
S33,474
S112,500
S50,000
S159,922
S45,000
S60,000
S35,000
so
S18,998
S70,200
so
S12,000
S1,125,000
S54,586
S135,000
S75,000
S236,669
S45,000
S80,000
S35,000
S24,441
S18,762
S125,011
so
S24.000
20.0
0.5
2.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.5
$2 230 559
'-------
- - -
---------------------------
,----
S349,400
so
so
so
S59,408
S30,000
S67,906
S3,565
so
S20,000
S75,000
S20,000
so
S30,000
S70,000
S16,731
Year4
2018-201 ~ L_____j
S3,627,654 - - S164,199 - - S2,184,524 - - S265,915
II
31.00
2018-2019
'-
-----------
---
-----------------
,----
$742,010
S449,400
so
so
so
S74,269
S30,000
S50,355
S7.345
so
S20,000
S85,000
S30,000
so
S30,000
S80,000
S20,962
41.17
---------------
---
-------------
$877,330
$1,031 320
r------
$6.640.120
I
I
FTE
S1 ,170,000
S76,670
S157.500
S100,000
S230.479
S45,000
S80,000
S35,000
S10,790
S18,585
S244,870
so
S36,000
S600,372 - - S417,775 - - so , _
S549,400
so
so
so
S89,164
S30,000
S34,691
S2,680
so
S20,000
S100,000
S50,000
so
S30,000
$90,000
S35,385
---
2019-2020
26.0
1.0
3.5
2.0
2.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
7.1
0.0
1.5
$3 223 040
~ '------S3,773,830 _ _ _
S172,409
S2,276.4 12 - - 5417,469
FTE
S1,170,000
S76,670
S157,500
S100,000
S230,479
S45,000
S80,000
S35,000
S10,790
S18,585
S244,870
so
S36,000
S559,620 - - S394,226 - - so _
YearS
I
I
25.0
0.5
3.0
1.5
2.4
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.7
0.0
3.1
0.0
1.0
$2 932 316
$6,242,292 1
I
FTE
S428.257 - - S305,208 - - so , - - - -
22.44
$5,629,969 1
I
FTE
FTE
II
$4,439,594 1
I
Year3
47.85
29.0
1.0
3.5
2.0
2.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
7.1
0.0
1.5
S600,372 - - S448,279 - - so , _
$3 253 544
'-------
-------------------------
---
--r------
S549,400
so
so
so
S89,164
S30,000
S14,365
S2,680
so
S20,000
S100,000
S50,000
so
S30,000
S90,000
S35,385
50.85
'--------_
___
---
---
---------------
-----
,-
$1 ,010,994
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
S11,300
S683,787
so
so
so
S8 ,000
so
so
so
$703 087
Administrative/Operations Support
Equipment Lease/Maintenance
Eguiement Purchase
Su~elies and Materials
Printing and Coe:iing
~ Posta ~ and Shieeing
~ Enro\lf11?~nt I Recruitment
~ Staffing {recruitment and assessment}
I!_ Technology Plan
72 other/Audit. Legal
63
64
65
66
67
s 11,000
S8,604
S10,000
S1,000
S4,400
S10,000
so
so
$2,000
'-------
- - ------------,----
S40,000
S400,000
S40,000
S150,000
S150,000
S16,000
so
so
S9,000
'----
- - -------------
$805 000
'-------
----------- - -
-- - -
$16,000
S40,000
S15,000
S3,000
S5,754
S20,000
so
S20,000
S15,000
S40,000
S600,000
S160,000
S150,000
S150,000
S17,000
so
S50,000
S11 ,000
- - --- - ---------
$1178 000
---------------
S19,000
S50,000
S15,000
S4,000
S7,108
S20,000
so
S20,000
S15,000
S40.000
S600,000
$160,000
S150,000
S150,000
S17,000
so
S50,000
S13,000
$1180 000
~
-----
-----------
,-
S22.000
560,000
S20,000
S5,000
S8,462
S20,000
so
S20,000
S20,000
S40.000 ~
-----
- - ---------
r-----ii
5600,000
S160,000
S150,000
S150,000
S17 ,000
so
S50,000
S13,000
--___
---------
,-
$1 180 000
L
---------------
,-
$22,000
560,000
$20,000
S5,000
S8,462
S20,000
so
S20,000
S20,000
'-------
==
------- -___
---
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
SUBTOTAL
ADMINISTRATIVE/OPERATIONS
SUPPORT
$47 004
Manaaement Companv
Fees
Salaries/Other Emelo:iee Costs
Curriculum
Accounting and Pa:iroll
Other
84
85
86
87
88
2% CONTINGENCY CHECK
#Students
REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES
$235,100 so - - so - - so
so
--11
I
I
$235,100
$3,262,281
I
I
$134 754
$150 108
$175 462
$175 462
S232,625 so - - so - - so
S226,300 '------so - - so
so - - so
S215,000 ~
so - - so - - so - - so
S215,000
so _
so _ _ _
$0 _
- - -
so r - - 1
$232,625
$4,144,948
L___j
320
$93,385
S67 574.88
---
11
$226,300
SB6 924.18
$5,824,822
L_____j
L___j
425
$294,646
$215,000
$5,364,054
525
$265,915
S106 706.46
so
11
$215,000
L_____j
600
$417,470
S119527.54
r------
ss.835,ooo
I__
630
sao5,12o 1
S124 453.02
FEDERAL FUNDS
APPENDIX 2
I
Federal Funds
Year 1
2015-2016 _
S220,214
S175,000
Entitlement FundinQ
~ nonSEA grant
3
4
5
FEDERAL REVENUE
6
7
Federal Expenses
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
..
42
43
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
56
59
60
II
--
~ '------S287,972 - - -
Year3
2017-201~ L__j
S355,730 - - -
II
II
II
S~ecial
Education Teachers
Princie:aVAdministrative
Nurse
Clerical
Custodial
Instructional Coach
EPER
Paraerofessionals
Substitutes
Cafeteria
Other Employer Costs {30.48% of Salaries)
Health Insurance
Other Benefits
II
S395,214 1
I
2015-2016
so
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
Classroom Teachers
Year 2
so
so
so
S26,824
so
so
so
S69,584
S766
S69,126
so
so
S355.730
2016-2017
so
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
II
so
so
S35,078
so
so
so
S77 ,357
S1,002
S34,800
so
so
S50,220
S10,000
so _ -
S406,549
so - - II
so
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.33
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
so
so
S43,331
so
so
so
S95,559
S1,238
S42,989
so
so
S62,036 l _ j
S12.494
---
so _ --
4.00
$278 060
5.43
II
$406,549 1
I
2018-2019
so
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
2.75
0.00
0.00
FTE
L___j
$224 982
2018-201~ L__j
S20,414
so , - -
5.56
2017-2018
FTE
$16,526
S54.540 u
S29,529
$263 006
$287,972 1
FTE
S12,637
so
Year4
Years
2019-2020 ' - - - 5426,876 - - -
so
r----
$426,876 1
I
2019-2020
FTE
FTE
S23,330
so
so
S49,521
so
so
so
S109,210
S1,415
S49,130
so
so
S70,898 l _ j
S14,365
so _ --
$317 870
5 .95
so
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
2.75
0.00
0.00
S23,330
so
so
S49,521
so
so
so
S109.210
S1 ,415
S49,130
so
so
S70,898 L
S14,365
---
so
r----
$317 870
5.95
Student Support
Transeortation
Extra Curricular Transeortation
Cafeteria
Extra Curricular
SU.Q:E!lies and Materials
Textbooks
Curriculum
Professional Development
Assessments
Other Educational Program
Theraeists (Occueational, Seeech)
Classroom Technology
School Climate
Comeuters
Contracted Services
Other
S600 '-------
S600 -
so
so
so
S600 -
so
so
so
----S458 - - so - -
so - - so - - so - - S731
-so ---
S90,935
S20,215 - -
--
so - so - so - so - so - so - so - -
S39,645
S32,655 - - -
---
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so - - so - - -
S3,269 -
S2.500 , - - -
S4 ,038
$62,990
S114 708
-----
----------
S600 -
S600 '-------
so
so
so
so - so -so --S836
--so --
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
S4,615
-------------r---
$88 680
$77,670
S65,635
S37,320 - - -
---
so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so _
Utilities
Maintenance
Tereehone/Communications
Construction
Renovation
Other
so c.___
so - so - so - so - so - - so - so - so ,---
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
Insurance Property/Liability)
Rent
Mortoaoe
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
----------- -_ --
------- - - ------
,--
$0
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
'-
--------- -----r---
$0
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
---
_
___
-----
$0
;t
Administrative/Operations Support
Eguiement Lease/Maintenance
Eguiement Purchase
Sueeries and Materials
~ Printing and Coey_!ng
66 PostaQe and Shieeing
67 Enrollment I Recruitment
68 Staffing _recruitment and assessment
~ Technology Plan
70 Other
61
62
63
64
so - so - so - so - so - so - so - so _
so so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - - ,,..,,
so - - so , - -
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
so '------so - - so - - so - - so
11
so '---so - - so - - so - - so
11
so '---so - - so - - so - - -
so '---so _
so ___
so - - so r----
so ~
71
72
73
74
75
76
n
,I L
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
SUBTOTAL
ADMINISTRATIVE/OPERATIONS
SUPPORT
Manaaement Company
Fees
Salaries/Other Em loyee Costs
Curriculum
Accounting and Payroll
Other
S17,500 -
so - so - so
so - -
11
$17,500
$0
$395,214 1
l__j
320
$0
$287.972
c___
--------------r----
$0
'----
---------------
r----
so ~
$406,549
so I
600
($0)
I
L___j
525
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
---
------_ -___
r----
so
$0
$355.730
L_____j
425
(SO) [
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
I
L___j
I
$426,876 1
t__
630
$0
OTHER FUNDS
APPENDIX
5
6
7
so - so
so
10
11
Other Expenses
II
$15 ooo
--
II
II
II
2015 -2016
so ___
so - - -
S20,000
so
so
so
$20 000
Year4
2017-201~ L__j
so ___
S15,000 - -
Donations
Year3
2016 -2017 ~
so - -
Foundation Funds
OTHER REVENUE
Year2
8
9
Year1
Other Funds
1
2
3
so
---
-------
S20,000 - - -
r--1
II
II
2016-2017
so
S20.000
I
---
so - - so
II
II
0
2017-2018
YearS
2018-201~ L__j
so
so
S20,000
so
so
so
s2o.ooo
___
-----
-----
II
r--
2019-2020
Costs
13
Classroom Teachers
Special Education Teachers
S ~ cial Teachers {Qh:ts Ed 1 Art , Music}
Counselors
PrinciQaUAdministrative
Nurse
Clerical
Custodial
Instructional Coach
EPER
Paraj:_!rofessionals/Hourt:r
Substitutes
Cafeteria
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
45
46
..
47
49
50
FTE
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so U
and Materials
Textbooks
Curriculum
Professional Oevelo(:!ment
Assessments
Other Educational PrQgram
Theral:!:ists (Occu~ational 1 S~ech)
Classroom TechnolQgv
School Climate
Comj!uters
Contracted Services
Other
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
$0
$0
0.00
------
--
--
0.00
so so - - so - - so - S20,000 --so - - -
so - - so
---
-so - -
so - -so - - so - - so - - -
so - so _
so - - so - - so ,----
so - so - so - $15,000
so - - -
$20,000
FTE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
so U
so - so
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
so U
so - - so _
so ~
Cafeteria
FTE
so - so ,---
so
so
so
S15,000
so
so
so
Extra Curricular
Su~(;!lies
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
so
FTE
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
$20 ooo
2018-2019
2019-202ql _ _
so ___
so - - S20.000 - - so - -so - - so
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
1:
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
so ,------
so U
so - - so _
so L
so - - so _
$0
$0
$0
so
---
0.00
so '----so - - so - - -
so
S20,000
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
-----
----------- ----
---
-----
,------
S20,000
so
so
so
so
S20,000
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
0.00
-------
------- --------------,----
$20,000
so
so
so
so
S20,000
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
0.00
$20 000
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
so so -- --
Insurance (Property/Liability)
Rent
Mortgage
Utilities
Tele~hone/Communications
:;f
65
66
67
68
{ I
.,
75
76
n
78
79
80
81
82
83
"86
87
SUBTOTAL
ADMINISTRATIVE/OPERATIONS
SUPPORT
Manaaement Company
Fees
Salaries/Other Employee Costs
Curriculum
Accounting and Pa~roll
Other
Students
I#REVENUE
LESS EXPENDITURES
,------
so _
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
$0
$0
so
$0
so '------so - - so - - -
so
so
so
so
so
so
so ,-----
so ,------
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
$0
$0
so
so
so '--so - -
so '---so - - so - - so - - so r--1
so ~
so ~
so ~
so - - so - - so - - so l i
so
so _
so _
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
--
---------
,-------
--
so - -
so l i
-----
so '----so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - -
so
Construction
Renovation
Other
Administrative/Operations Support
Eauiomentlease/Maintenance
Egui(;!ment Purchase
Su,Qj;!lies and Materials
~ Printing and Col!ying
70 Postage and Shipping
71 Enrollment I Recruitment
72 Starting (recruitment and assessment
!!... Technology Plan
74 Other
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so - so - so - so - -
Maintenance
so - so _
so ' - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so - - so ,----
$0
II
s15 aao
IL__jI
320
so
s2o aoa
I
L__j
---------
so
-so --so - - so - - so - - -
s2a.oao
IL_____jI
525
$0
$0
---
$0
425
$0
'-------
so
so
-----
---
-----------
so - - -
so
---
-so --so - - so
11
$0
ua oao
so
_
___
--- -- --
-----
'----
---_
____!:: -
-_
___
,----
---
so r-$0
IL_____jI
s2a.ooo
L___
600
630
$0
$0
425
425
Special:
Location
Districts:
Appoquinimink
Brandywine
25
Caesar Rodney
Cape Henlopen
Capital
Transportation Eligible Students:
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
0
0
0
0
125
75
Christina
Colonial
Delmar
Indian River
Lake Forest
0
0
199
0
0
0
Laurel
Milford
0
0
Red Clay
Seaford
Smyrna
Woodbridge
425
425.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.23
1.00
0.17
0.06
1.00
0.65
0.10
0.00
0.20
1.70
0.46
0.00
0.00
2.00
1.00
0.73
2.64
Total Staffing =
Total Staffing For Health Insurance=
37.94
35.30
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
K-3 students =
Regular students 4-12 =
Basic students 4-12 =
Intense Students 4-12=
Complex Students 4-12=
16.2
20
8.4
6
2.6
$34,000
$43,862
$65,033
$65,033
$51,641
$56,461
$43,590
$39,651
$41 ,939
$39,240
$44,717
$44,717
$44,717
$20,377
$24,753
$26,489
$11,852
$891 ,975
$43,862
$11 ,056
$3,902
$51 ,641
$36,700
$4,359
$0
$8,252
$66,708
$20,581
$0
$0
$40,754
$24,753
$19,337
$31 ,289
$1 ,255,169
$382 ,575
$358,954
30.48%
$10,168
$1,996,6981
$
$
26.23
2,925
2,435
6,499
$
$
$
$
$
76,736
63,881
170,489
11,048
335,249
$657,4021
$2,654,1 oo 1
Regular/Special K-3
16.2
Disclaimer: The following estimates will vary from actuals and do not account for any extenuating circumstances.
--State earnings are detailed on the New Charter State Template Tab below.
8.4
2.6
,K-3
New Castle
20
Ent er th e nu mber of students in th e red cell s below by schoo l di st rict and student type and Ul e es tim ated fu nds Will ca lcu late be tow .
. . ..... . ..... ............. . . . ... ..... . ....... ... ... ..... ......... ... .... .. ... ........... . . -
State Funding
$2,654,100
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4- 12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
$3,177.42
$2 ,573 .71
$6, 127.88
$8 ,579.03
$19,797.75
so
so
so
so
34 Colonial
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
75.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
75.00
Amount
$2,937 .20
$2,379.13
$5,664.60
$7,930.44
$18,301 .01
S220,290
$0
$0
$0
15 Lake Forest
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
1.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
1.00
Amount
$1,354 .77
$1,097.37
$2,612 .77
$3 ,6 57 .88
$8,441 .27
$1,355
$0
$0
$0
$0
S1,355
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
199.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
199.00
Amount
$3,829 .95
$3, 102.26
$7,386 .34
$10 ,340.88
$23,863.56
$762,1 60
$0
$0
$0
35 Woodbridge
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 412
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$1 ,252 .37
$1,014.42
$2,415 .28
$3,381.39
$7,803 .21
$0
A~~oguinlmln~
j7
Ca~e Henlo~ea
$1 ,591 .99
$1 ,289.51
$3,070.27
$4,296 .38
$9,919 .34
Amount
so
so
$0
$0
so
so
$0
$0
so
31 Brandvwtne
Regular/Special K-3
Re{:lular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
13 Capl1al
Regular/Special K-3
Regu lar Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
$220,290
so
$762,160
26.23 -,
[J
$4,229,902
#
0.00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0.00
29
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
UNITS
so
$0
so
so
so
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
25.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.00
Amount
$4,592.97
$3,720.31
$8,857.87
$12,401.02
$28,617.75
$114,824
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$1,451.59
$1,175.79
$2,799.50
$3,919.31
$9,044.55
$0
$0
$0
#
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$707.15
$572.79
$1,363.79
$1,909.31
$4,408.09
$0
$0
$0
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$540.52
$437.82
$1,042.42
$1,459.39
$3,387.83
$0
#
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0
S114,824
so
so
1 o Caesar Bodo!::v:
Reaular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$1,004.64
$813.76
$1,937.52
$2.712.53
$6,259.68
$0
$0
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regula r Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
125 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
125.00
Amount
$3,817 .38
$3,092 .08
$7,362 .10
$10,306 .94
$23,785 .24
S477,173
36 Indian Rjver
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$2,847 .58
$2,306.54
$5,491.76
$7 ,688.46
$17,742 .60
so
so
so
so
so
so
#
0.00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0.00
Amount
$1,152.73
$933 .72
$2,223.13
$3,112.38
$7,182.42
$0
$0
#
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0.00
$0
so
so
$0
o.oo
23 Seaford
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
so
so
so
so
so
$0
so
so
Amount
$999 .35
$809 .47
S1 .927 .31
$2,698.24
$6,226.70
so
so
$0
so
so
so
ll...Mill2n!
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 412 Basic
Special Students 4121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
24 smv:ma
Regular/Specia l K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Ba sic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
so
so
so
so
so
$0
so
$0
$477,173
so
so
$0
so
$1,174 .96
$951 .72
$2,266.00
$3 ,172.40
$7,320.92
Amount
so
so
$0
$0
so
so
525
522
3
0
31
0
0
0
154
93
Christina
Colonial
0
0
Delmar
Indian River
Lake Forest
0
0
Laurel
Milford
Red Clay
246
0
0
0
Seaford
Smyrna
Woodbridge
525
494.00
28.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
32.25
1.00
0.22
0.08
1.00
1.00
0.13
0.00
0.24
2.10
0.57
0.00
0.00
3.00
1.00
0.73
3.26
Total Staffing =
Total Staffing For Health Insurance=
46.58
43.32
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
K-3 students =
Regular students 4-12 =
Basic students 4-12 =
Intense Students 4-12=
Complex Students 4-12=
16.2
20
8.4
6
2.6
$34,000
$43,862
$65,033
$65,033
$51,641
$56,461
$43,590
$39,651
$41,939
$39,240
$44,717
$44,717
$44,717
$20,377
$24,753
$26,489
$11 ,852
$1 ,096,533
$43,862
$14,307
$5,203
$51,641
$56,461
$5,667
$0
$10,144
$82,404
$25,301
$0
$0
$61 ,131
$24,753
$19,337
$38,638
$1 ,535,382
$467,984
$440,474
30.48%
$10,168
$2,443,839
$
$
32.25
2,925
2,435
6,492
$
$
$
$
$
94,334
78,531
209,380
13,634
414,131
$81o,o1o 1
$3,253,849
Regular/Special K-3
16.2
Disclaimer: The following estimates will vary from actuals and do not account for any extenuating circumstances.
--State eamings are detailed on the New Charter State Template Tab below.
8.4
2.6
IK;4- -
New Castle
20
Ente r the numbe r or students in the red c ell s be lo w by school district an d stude nt type an cJ 111e cstunateiJ funds Wi ll calcu late lletow .
. . ..... ..... ........... . . . . . . ..... . .......... -.............. _..... . . ............... .. -State Funding
$3,253,849
32.25
-]
CJ
$5,191,649
$1,937,800
UNITS
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Sludents 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
31 Brandywine
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
29.00
2.00
0.0 0
0.00
0.00
31 .00
Amount
S133,196
$7,441
$0
H Ca~e HenloQen
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
13 Caojtal
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Baste
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0 0
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
33 Christina
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
88 .00
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
93 .00
Amount
$258,474
$11,696
$0
$0
$0
$270,369
37 Delmar
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
36 Indian River
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
15 Lake Forest
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
1.00
Amount
$1,355
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1 ,355
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
#
231.00
13.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
246.00
Amount
$884,718
$40,329
$14,773
$0
$0
$939,821
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0 0
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
~9 ~~~oguinlmin~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
35 Woodbrjdge
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
. -
0 .00
so
1.U.ru!I!tl
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
23 Seaford
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
so
$0
$140,637
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
10 Caesar Rodney
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12lntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
18 Milford
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4 12 Complex
so
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
145.00
6.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
154.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Regular/Special K3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Amount
$553,520
$24,737
$7,362
$0
$0
$565,619
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Amount
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
600
587
13
0
35
0
0
0
175
110
0
0
1
Christina
Colonial
Delmar
Indian River
Lake Forest
0
0
279
0
0
0
Laurel
Milford
Red Clay
Seaford
Smyrna
Woodbridge
600
470.00
117.00
13.00
0.00
0.00
36.41
1.00
0.24
0.09
1.00
1.00
0.15
0.00
0.27
2.40
0.64
0.00
0.00
3.00
1.00
0.73
3.72
Total Staffing=
Total Staffing For Health Insurance=
51.65
47.93
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
K-3 students =
Regular students 4-12 =
Basic students 4-12 =
Intense Students 4-12=
Complex Students 4-12=
16.2
20
8.4
6
2.6
$34,000
$43,862
$65,033
$65,033
$51,641
$56,461
$43,590
$39,651
$41,939
$39,240
$44,717
$44,717
$44,717
$20,377
$24,753
$26,489
$11,852
$1,237,939
$43,862
$15,608
$5,853
$51,641
$56,461
$6,539
$0
$11,452
$94,176
$28,564
$0
$0
$61,131
$24,753
$19,337
$44,089
$1,701,405
$518,588
$487,381
30.48%
$10,168
$2,707,374
$
$
36.41
2,925
2,435
6,489
$
$
$
$
$
106,499
88,658
236,258
15,573
473,292
$92o,2so 1
$3,627,6541
Regular/Special K-3
Disclaimer: The following estimates will vary from actuals and do not account for any extenuating circumstances.
--State earnings are detailed on the New Charter State Template Tab below.
16.2
20
8.4
New Castle
2.6
Enter th e num ber of studen ts in th e red ce lls be low by sc ho ol district and student type an d the est imated f unds wi ll ca lculate below .
.,
State Funding
$3,627,654
$2,184,524
UNITS
31 Brandywine
RegulartSpeciat K~3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12tntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
13 Capital
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Amount
$255,536
$49 ,962
$11 ,329
$0
$0
$316,627
37 Delmar
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Amount
$1,355
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,355
#
218.00
55.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
279.00
Amount
$834,929
$170,624
$44,316
$0
$0
$1,049,871
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0, 00
0. 00
0.00
1Z Ca~e t:tenlo~e!]
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
0.0 0
0.00
0.00
0.0 0
0.00
0.00
34 Colonial
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
87.00
21 .00
2.00
0.00
0.00
110.00
15 Lake Forest
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
32 Red Clay
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
35 Woodbridge
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Baste
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
51,591. 99
51 .289 .51
$3 ,070 .27
54 ,298 .36
$9,919.34
'
36~41~
[J
$5,812,178
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Regular/Special K~3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
29 ArU!OQuinim!nk
#
27.00
7.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
Amount
$124,010
$26,042
$8,858
$0
$0
$156,910
10 Caesar Rodney
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
33 Christina
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
137.00
34.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
175.00
Amount
$522,981
$105,131
$29,448
$0
$0
$657,560
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
36 Indian River
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
16 Laurel
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
18 Milford
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
23 Seaford
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
o.oo
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
630
613
17
0
35
0
0
0
183
121
0
0
1
Christina
Colonial
Delmar
Indian River
Lake Forest
0
0
290
0
0
0
Laurel
Milford
Red Clay
Seaford
Smyrna
Woodbridge
630
457.00
156.00
17.00
0.00
0.00
38.03
1.00
0.25
0.09
1.00
1.00
0.15
0.00
0.29
2.52
0.67
0.00
0.00
3.00
1.00
0.73
3.91
Total Staffing =
Total Staffing For Health Insurance=
53.64
49.73
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
Unit size
16.2
20
8.4
6
2.6
K-3 students =
Regular students 4-12 =
Basic students 4-12 =
Intense Students 4-12=
Complex Students 4-12=
$34,000
$43,862
$65,033
$65,033
$51,641
$56,461
$43,590
$39,651
$41 ,939
$39,240
$44,717
$44,717
$44,717
$20,377
$24,753
$26,489
$1 1,852
$1,293,145
$43,862
$16,258
$5,853
$51 ,641
$56,461
$6,539
$0
$11 ,963
$98,885
$29,838
$0
$0
$61,131
$24,753
$19,337
$46,341
$1 ,766,007
$538,279
$505,627
30.48%
$10,168
$2,8os,s13
$
$
$
38.03
2,925
2,435
6,488
$
$
$
$
$
111 ,249
92 ,612
246,751
16,349
496,957
$963,9171
$3,773,s3o 1
Regular/Special K-3
16.2
Disclaimer: The following estimates will vary from actuals and do not account for any extenuating circumstances.
--State earnings are detailed on the New Charter State Template Tab below.
8.4
2.6
~K-5
New Castle
20
En ter t he nu m b er o f st u dents In t he red ce ll s be low by sch oo l dist ri ct and stude nt type and t he es tin mtc d fund s w ill calculate below.
State Funding
$3,773,830
29 AI!QOguinlmlnk
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
0.00
Amount
Renular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Amount
53,177.42
52.573 .71
56.127 .88
58,579.03
519 ,797.75
so
so
so
so
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 412 Baste
Special Students 4121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34 Colonial
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
85.00
33,00
3.00
0.00
0.00
121.00
Amount
52,937.20
52.379 .13
55,664 .60
57.930.44
518,301 .01
$249,662
S78,511
$16,994
15 Lake Forest
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
#
1.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
1.00
Amount
51,354.77
51,097.37
52,612 .77
53,657.88
58 ,441 .27
S1,355
$0
$0
32 Red Clav
35 Woodbridge
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Baste
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
$0
$0
so
so
so
so
ti..l..ru!ill
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-1 2
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
S1,355
Amount
53,829.95
53,102.26
57,386.34
510,340.88
523 ,863.56
S815,779
S217,158
S51,704
#
0.00
Amount
$1,252.37
$1,014.42
$2,415.28
$3,381.39
$7,803.21
so
so
so
so
so
so
0.00
0.00
0.00
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 412
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
S345,167
213.00
70.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
290,00
0.00
31 Brandywine
so
so
so
so
so
so
H can }:jentoneo
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 Intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
Totals
38.03
[J
$6,050,241
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
UNITS
so
so
S1,084,642
0.00
~
Regular/Special K-3
RCQular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
26.00
8.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
35,00
Amount
$4,592.97
$3,720.31
$8,857.87
$12 ,401.02
528,617.75
S119,417
S29,762
$8,858
Amount
0.00
0.00
0.00
51,451 .59
$1,175.79
$2,799.50
$3,919.31
$9,044.55
so
so
so
so
so
so
0.00
0,00
0.00
so
so
10 Caesar Rodney
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-1 2 Basic
Special Students 4-1 21ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
51 ,004 .64
5813 .76
51 ,937.52
52,712.53
56.259.68
so
so
so
so
so
so
~
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 412 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-1 2 Complex
#
132.00
45.00
6.00
0.00
Amount
$3,817.38
$3,092.08
$7,362.10
$10,306.94
$23,785.24
S503,894
S139,144
S44,173
S158,038
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
#
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
$540.52
$437.82
$1,042.42
$1,459.39
53,367.83
so
so
#
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
Amount
5999.35
5809.47
51.927.31
52,698.24
56,226.70
so
so
$707.15
$572.79
$1 ,363.79
$1,909.31
$4,406.09
Amount
so
$0
$0
so
so
so
$0
so
so
so
$0
so
so
so
0.00
183,00
36 India n R!yer
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
18 Milford
Regular/Special K-3
ReQular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-12 intense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
24 Smyrna
Regular/Special K-3
Regular Students 4-12
Special Students 4-12 Basic
Special Students 4-121ntense
Special Students 4-12 Complex
so
so
S687,210
#
0,00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
Amount
52.847 .58
52.306.54
55,491.76
57 ,688.46
$0
$0
#
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Amount
51,152 .73
$933.72
$2,223.13
53,112.38
$7,182.42
so
so
so
so
Amount
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$1,174.98
$951.72
$2,266.00
$3,172.40
$7,320 .92
so
so
so
S17.742.60
so
so
so
so
$0
so
$0
so
so
Funds Expenses:
Line 10 Special Education Teachers 33% of a teacher providing special education
services is funded through federal entitlement funds.
Line 13 Principal/Administrative the Director of Student Services is partially
funded through the consolidated grant.
Line 17 Instructional Coach 1 full time coach is funded through the consolidated
grant increasing to 1.5 over time.
Line 18 EPER Funds complementing those allocated in the State and Local
budget for additional roles/responsibilities taken on by staff members.
Line 19 Paraprofessionals Currently funded through the consolidated grant and
the non-SEA grant.
Line 35 Curriculum Partially funded through the consolidated grant and the nonSEA to provide Center for Applied Linguistics and Expeditionary Learning training
and curriculum.
Line 36 Professional Development Partially funded by federal entitlement grants
Line 44 Other Travel for professional development activities.
Line 75 CMO fees Partially funded by the non-SEA grant.
Other Fund Expenses:
Line 34 - Supplies and Materials Funded by donations
BUILDING #26
SCALE: NTS
TETRA
TECH
Aa04111CTI 6 INCINIRI
BUILDING #26
SCALE:NTS
TETRA
TECH
A&04mcn INOINIIU