Application of FACTS Technology in Modern

AGC Connected Power System

Research Proposal

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SRINAGAR

Department of Electrical Engineering
Under the guidance of
Dr. M D Mufti
S Zahid Nabi Dar
PhD/FOE/02/13

Abstract
Flexible Alternating current transmission systems (FACTS) technology is opening up
opportunities for controlling power and enhancing usable capacity of present as well as new and
upgraded lines. FACTS technology functions by controlling the parameters governing operation of
power transmission such as voltage, current, phase angle and series as well as shunt reactance. A wellchosen FACTS controller can overcome the specific limitations of a designated transmission line or a
corridor. FACTS Controllers are broadly classified as series and shunt compensator
In applications for controlling the current/power flow and damping oscillations, the series
controller for a given MVA size is several times more powerful than the shunt controller .In our work we
will incorporate, Thyristor Controlled Phase Angle Regulator (TCPAR) adjusted by thyristor switches to
provide a rapidly variable phase angle.
A decentralized control based on Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) for
positioning of TCPAR systems in power systems with high wind penetration will be implemented.
effects on power system stability frequency deviation and power oscillation damping would be analyzed.

Introduction
Worldwide transmission systems are heavily loaded. In the optimized use of transmission systems
investment is important to support social industry, create employment and efficiently utilize scarce
resources. Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) caters to these needs. It
significantly alters the way transmission systems are developed and controlled along with improvements
in system flexibility, asset utilization and system performance. FACTS devices are classified as shunt
and series devices depending on the way these devices are connected. Thyristor Controlled Phase Angle
Regulator (TCPAR) and Unified Power Flow Controllers (UPFC) are series FACTS devices. Reactive
Power compensators, energy storage devices and braking resistors are shunt FACTS devices.
In this work we will be dealing with TCPAR. It has been established that FACTS devices like TCPAR
or UPFC can participate in the power system control in perfect manner, both in steady and transient
states for post power disturbance swing damping. There is little information available regarding the
influence of the use of these devices on slow dynamic system responses accompanying the power and
frequency regulation after a long term imbalance of tie-line interchange power. New FACTS based
devices may be used for the compensation of sudden load change devices.

Literature Survey
Researchers have used SMES (Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage) devices in order to
suppress frequency deviations through tie-line power regulation [1]. Also a case of using SSSC (Static
Synchronous Series Compensator) for frequency regulation is noted [2]. Thyristor Controlled Phase
Shifter (TCPS) is expected to be an effective apparatus for tie-line power flow control of an
interconnected power system. So far only few papers [3-6] related to TCPS applications in the load
frequency control have been published. The problem of the interconnection exchange was analyzed first
by Elgerd [7, 8] and a critical review of application of modern control theory to AGC (Automatic
Generation Control) by Carpenter [9]. Many components of power systems are nonlinear. Operating
point of a power system may change often during a daily cycle. However if the time horizon to be
analyzed does not exceed a few minutes, then linear models are used. FACTS devices affect power
interchanges and dynamics of secondary control. Proper control algorithm and parameter selection at
regulator of series FACTS devices leads to stable control of frequency and tie line interchange process.
The ibid will be discussed with the help of Thyristor Controlled Phase Angle Regulator
(TCPAR), which acts as a fast phase shifting transformer from power system consideration. Thyristor
Tap Changer can neither generate nor absorb reactive power. AC voltage source supplies or absorbs the
requisite reactive power in case of TCPAR.
FACTS concept uses circuit reactance, voltage and phase angle as controls to redistribute line
flow and regulate nodal voltage. Due to physical constraints of above mentioned parameters most of the
high voltage transmission lines are operating far below their thermal rating through use of above
controls. FACTS enable line loading to increase flexibility to their thermal limits. FACTS control can
increase the capacity of individual corridors to about 80%.
From Jian Xu et al [10], it is seen that a coordinated frequency control scheme of wind turbines
saturable reactors and generator bus voltages are to be researched thoroughly. By taking these conditions
into account the system operating conditions will be further improved. The power distribution among the
Microgrids is usually achieved in a centralized way. In this method, the distribution of power is based on
central controller which sends out reference signals through communication links.

This method is widely used, but suffers from inherent single point of failure and imposes serious
limitations when there are a large number of spatially distributed elements. We prefer to use a
decentralized method based on droop control power regulation with external communication link being
removed.
Schematic diagram of a TCPAR is shown in fig 1.1. An integral type regulator with negative
feedback is placed in the main control path. The Task of regulator is regulating real power flow in line
where the FACTS device is installed. Reference value is supplied from supervisory control system. A
supplementary control loop devoted to damping of power swings and improving stability is shown in the
lower part of the diagram.

p
Ptie ref
max

Ptie

Ptie

KP

1
T ps

+
+
min

Supplementary
Fig. 1.1 Power ow controller installed in a tie-line of an interconnected power system
control

Motivation for the Work

Motivation for the work surveyed is to derive state variable control using a nonlinear system
model. Changes in operating conditions and network parameters are taken care of by such a design.
Estimation of all state variables (rotor angles and speed deviation of all generators) requires Wide Area
Measurements (WAM) and extended communication links. To avoid WAM control based method, local
measurement is preferred.
Optimal control limitations:

Standard optimal control uses a linearized model.

Valid only for a given operating point.

Robustness of such system is limited within this range.

Control based on linearized system model is in question when system operating conditions
change due to line or generator outages.

Moreover stressed power systems are known to exhibit nonlinear behaviour.

4 Problem Formulation

(a)

Pab

Pab

Pab

(b)
(c)

hab.

a
hab

Pab

ab

ab

Pab

0)

hab

V Vp a
Pab

ab

(d)

V C

ab

V a

Vp

cb
V b

Fig1.2 Stages of developing an incremental model of a transmission line with a phase shifting transformer
(a) one-line diagram (b) admittance model with transmission ratio (c) incremental model (d) phasor diagram

cb
V b

Fig 1.2 illustrates the stages of developing a model of a phase shifting transformer installed in a tie line.
A booster voltage which is in quadrature with supply is injected in the transmission line using a booster
transformer.

Vp

= V a

Where is the controlled variable

hab

The variable

corresponds to the mutual synchronizing power for the line ab calculated

neglecting the booster transformer..

hab

corresponds to the synchronizing power when the

booster transformer is taken into account .From above equations we have :-

Pab

hab ab

hab

This describes the incremental model of the transmission line. There is an equivalent transmission line
between nodes a & b. A change in the flow in that line corresponds to the change in voltage angles at
both sides. Nodal power injection corresponds to regulation of the quadrature transformation ratio
(t).The power injections in nodes a and b are +

hab

.The main aim is how

(t )

should be

changed. so that control of a given phase shifting transformer improves damping of oscillations and see
effects on frequency deviation and stability of the system[11].

..
.

Network

b
(t
)

(a
)

(b
)

-+ hab

- hab

- h

ab

HG

+hab

PG

(c
)

b
a

Fig 1.3 Stages of developing the incremental model (a) admittance model with a phase shifting transformer
(b ) incremental model (c) incremental model after elimination of nodes L

Present day power systems undergo significant transformations. Increasing requirements for technical
economic and social environmental issues makes single technology inadequate. It is necessary to build a
new power system generation with possible energy sources which can be a single source of power from
a few kW up to more than 10kW, as well as large power plants with a capacity of 1000MW. From the
previous research of Desire et al [12], it was found that when generating source is composed totally of
conventional thermal units it is worth noting that change of structure of one sub system has an impact on
the quality of the frequency control in the other sub systems operating synchronously. It can be seen that
performance index (PI) is highest for systems having individual subsystems largely saturated with wind
generation.
Wind farms are very unstable source of power .Wind energy used in wind turbines is not subject
to control .Wind farms output varies mainly with change in wind speed. There are two modes for
locally consuming wind power .One is grid parallel mode ,in which wind power is connected to local
grid, which in turn is connected to regional grid. Support from regional power grid results in smooth
operation and control when wind power is consumed in this mode. Other is isolated power system with
significant penetration of wind power [13].
The AGC should control the frequency in response to load and generation changes by
opening(closing) the turbine valves TCSC and STATCOM can be used to change the power transfer
capability in transmission lines and controlling acceleration torque in a synchronous generators. The
amount of power change after a disturbance is unknown. The droop control based on power system
frequency deviation and power electronic based converters, distributed energy resources (DERs) can
control the disturbance and change their active power[14-17].
A central controller can be implemented to manage DERs benefit of the centralized control in that
the error signal is based on the injected power at point of common coupling and the implemented control
can minimize transient error [18-20]. Shortcomings of this method are communication delay and wide
area data acquisition system to be used. While decentralized controllers need not communicate delays,
they can act rapidly based on local measurements. But uncertainty of generation in different conditions
may weaken the performance of the system. An Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is

proposed to overcome the short comings. Most important benefit of ANFIS is considering uncertainty of
system in the controller design. These controllers are trained by neural networks based on centralized
controller of the previous part. Using the deviation of frequency, controller can predict the future
behaviour of the frequency and adjust the output control signal properly.
A hybrid wind coal power system can be kept stable by adjusting the outputs of coal-fired
generators to respond to fluctuations of wind power during steady state. Thermal power plants offer two
forms of storage Kinetic energy storage from the turbine alternator shaft system and virtual storage from
the speed governor system. From Luo et.al [21] it was seen that perturbation wind power to thermal
plants is independent of transmission distances Perturbation frequency deviations are identical at every
thermal generation plant .We propose to use devices like TCPAR for large wind penetration with
automatic generation control for a relatively large power system and see the effect on stability and
power oscillation damping and frequency deviation.

Approach
1. Literature survey
A thorough literature survey was carried out where most of the papers stressed on
heterogeneous power system. Many authors have suggested the use of conventional power
system in cooperation with systems with high wind penetration. After analyzing and taking
the literature into consideration it was concluded that very little work has been done over
years regarding inclusion of series FACTS device into the power systems with high
penetration of wind.
2. Modelling of heterogeneous power system with incorporation of TCPAR
This scheme consists of three sub systems:(a) A three area power systems with generators and load frequency controller of its own is to
be developed in Matlab environment.
(b) An incremental model of TCPAR with state space analysis is to be developed and
interconnected to the system.
(c) Wind energy conversion systems (WECS)
In WECS a variable speed wind turbine will be modelled for different wind condtions.To
make the wind speed adjustable, the wind turbine generator is normally connected to the
utility grid through a power conversion system. The converter system enables the control of
the wind speed. The main advantages of variable-speed turbine include increase in wind
energy output, improved power quality and reduced mechanical stress.

3. Controller Design for Modulating TCPARs Parameters

A heterogeneous power system with high penetration of wind is to be installed with a
series FACTS device viz TCPARs at various point of interconnections and analyzed. We will
follow a decentralized control mechanism which would avoid extensive communication link.
Control based on local measurement would be used. Designing of adaptive controllers for
optimum positioning of TCPARs and effect on stability and power oscillation damping and
frequency deviation would be analyzed

Computer Simulation
In order to verify the physical behaviour of the system, the scheme would be implemented in a
simulation environment. Through precise computer simulation the above work could be incorporated for
real operating conditions in order to verify the performance of the system.

References

1. Banerjee S, Chatterjee JK, Tripathy SC, Application of magnetic energy storage unit as load
frequency stabilizer IEEE Trans Energy Convers1990;5(1), pp.4651.
2. Issarachai Ngamroo, Application of Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC) to Stabilization
of Frequency Oscillations in an Interconnected Power System, IEEE Conference paper, Vol. 3, pp.
113-116
3. S.Robak, D.D Rasolomampionona, M Januszewski, Damping of power swings using a FACTS
device of the TCPS TYPE: modelling and laboratory experiments, International Journal Of Electrical
Education
4. ukasz Nogal, Jan Machowski, WAMS based control of series FACTS devices installed in tie-lines
of interconnected power system, International journal of electrical education, Vol. 59(3-4), pp. 121140 (2010)
5. Rasolomampionona DD

AGC and FACTS stabilization device coordination in interconnected

power system control IEEE Bologna PowerTech; June 2326,

6. Abraham RJ, Das D, Patra A. AGC of a hydrothermal system with thyristor controlled phase shifter
in the tie-line. In: Proc IEEE power India conference April 2006. pp. 714.
7. Elgerd I, Fosha CE, Optimum megawatt-frequency control of multiarea electric energy systems,
IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1970; PAS-89(4): pp.556-63
8. Fosha CE, Elgerd I., The megawatt-frequency control problem: a new approach via optimal control
theory,IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1970;PAS-89(4): pp.556-77
9. Carpentier J. State of the art review: To be or not to be modern that is the question for automatic
Generation control, Electr Power Energy SYST 1985; 7(2): pp.81-91
10. Jian Xu, Member, IEEE, Siyang Liao, Yuanzhang Sun An Isolated Industrial Power System Driven
by Wind-Coal Power for Aluminum Productions: A Case Study of Frequency Control, IEEE
Transactions On Power Systems

11. Machowski J., Bialek J., Bumby J. Power System Dynamics Stability and Control John Wiley &
Sons, Chichester (2008)
12. Desire Rasolomampionona, Sohail Anwar, Interaction between phase shifting transformers installed
in the tie-lines of interconnected power systems and automatic frequency controllers Electrical Power
and Energy Systems (33), 2011, pp. 1351-1360
13. S.Robak, D.D.Rasolomampionona, M.Piekarz, L.Szymankiewicz, Selected problems of frequency
control for a multi-area power system with heterogeneous generation structure, IEEE conference, pp. 1
14. Dan Wu, Fen Tang, Tomislav Dragicevic ,A Control Architecture to Coordinate Renewable Energy
Sources and Energy Storage Systems in Islanded Microgrids, IEEE Transactions On Smart Grid, vol.
6, no. 3, may 2015
15. Guzmn Daz Cristina Gonzlez-Moran, Scheduling of Droop Coefcients for Frequency and
Voltage Regulation in Isolated Microgrids, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 25, No. 1,
February 2010
16. John P. Barton and David G. Infield, Energy Storage and Its Use With Intermittent Renewable
Energy, IEEE transactions on energy conversion, Vol. 19, NO. 2, June 2004
17. N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS Piscataway, N USA: IEEE Press, 2000.
18. A. Ghafouri, J. Milimonfared, and G. B. Gharehpetian, Coordinated Control of Distributed Energy
Resources and Conventional Power Plants for Frequency Control of Power Systems,

IEEE

transactions on smart grid

19. A. Yazdani and R. Iravani, Grid-imposed frequency VSC system: Control in dq-frame in VoltageSourced Converters in Power Systems, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010
20. Yang Mi, Yang Fu, Chengshan Wang Decentralized Sliding Mode Load Frequency Control for
Multi-Area Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
21. Changling Luo, Boon-Teck Ooi Frequency Deviation of Thermal Power Plants Due to Wind
Farms, IEEE transactions on energy conversion, Vol. 21, No. 3, September 2006