Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
In developing the calculations, the Eurocodes and Romanian rules in force were taken
into consideration:
PD 165 Standard on structures and calculation of the highway with bridges and culverts
and precast superstructure cast
SR EN 1990:2004 Eurocode : Basis of Structural Design
SR EN 1991-1-1:2004 Eurocode 1 : Actions on structures / Part 1-1 : General actions specific weight , their weight , the payload for buildings and SR EN 1991-2 : 2004 Part 2:
traffic impact on bridges
SR EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2 : Design of concrete structures / Part 1-1 : General rules and
rules for buildings EN 1992-2 and SR : 2006 Part 2: Concrete bridges - Design and detailing
rules
SR EN 1992-2:2006 - Design of concrete structures / Part 2: Concrete Bridges. Design and
detailing rules
SR EN 1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design / Part 1: General
SR EN 1998-1:2004 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance / Part 1 :
General rules , seismic actions and rules for buildings EN 1998-2 and SR : 2004 Part 2:
Bridges
STAS 2561/3-90 Terrain for foundation / PILES / General design
STAS 3221-86 Highway bridges . Convoys type and load classes
STAS 10111/2-87 Bridges railways and road / superstructure concrete, reinforced and
prestressed concrete / Design specifications
P100-1:2013 Seismic Design Code - Part I - Design provisions for buildings
2. MATERIALS
2.1 Existing structural elements
ruler and poles - concrete B400 mark - equivalent class C25/30
- fck = 25 MPa (resistance to compression feature in MPa)
- fcd = 16.67 MPa (design compression resistance in MPa)
- E = 32000 MPa (the modulus of elasticity in MPa)
Metal Fittings PC52
- fyk = 355 MPa (flow limit feature of fittings for concrete in MPa)
- ftk = 520 MPa (Tensile strength characteristic of fittings for concrete in MPa)
- fyd = 308.7 MPA (Tensile strength calculation of reinforcement for concrete in
MPa)
- Es = 210 GPa (the modulus of elasticity in GPa)
2.2 Structural elements designed
Plate Slab finishing cast concrete beams with small- openings C35/45
- fck = 35 MPa (resistance to compression feature in MPa)
- fcd = 23.33 MPa (design compression resistance in MPa)
- E = 34000 MPa (the modulus of elasticity in MPa)
Beams with large openings - Concrete C40/50
- fck = 40 MPa (resistance to compression feature in MPa)
1/49
2/49
4. Design assumptions
For all structural elements, state of efforts and deformations were determined for each load
considered. They were grouped using the principle of superposition effects , so you can check the
quality criteria of adequate strength and ultimate limit state , serviceability limit state or fatigue limit
state , where was the case. Next will be presented only the design situations that were conclusive
for the structural elements analyzed.
4.1 New superstructures
Phase calculations were carried out considering the time modifications of the physico mechanical properties of materials and the geometric calculation sections, which were sized by
fittings quantities required and were optimized with metal or concrete sections.
4.2 Old superstructures
Calculations were carried out for state of efforts and deformations to estimate reserves of
volumes of existing fittings, after which the effect of the designed works on the structural design was
calculated, which resulted in the additional volumes of fittings or steel.
4.3 Infrastructures
If elevations in both elevations and the foundations, the worst group proved to be the
earthquake, considering the final stage of the works. Regarding new works, they were consistently
sized, and the old ones bearing capacity was examined in relation to new efforts and, where
appropriate, consolidation building works were designed.
3/49
5. STRUCTURAL DESIGN
This chapter will present structural dimensioning of the components of each bridge in part,
designed to implement safe work and building structures to associated class for Section 2 km
51+041 km 85+000:
5.1 Bridge on DN71 over stream at km 51+540 ............................................................................. 5
5.2 Bridge on DN71 over stream at km 55+787 ............................................................................. 9
5.3 Bridge on DN71 over Valea Dracului at km 62+839 ............................................................... 13
5.4 Bridge on DN71 over stream Bizdidel at km 63+894 .............................................................. 14
5.5 Bridge on DN71 over river Ialomita at km 68+605 .................................................................. 17
5.7 Bridge on DN71 over river Ialomicioara at km 73+281 ........................................................... 27
5.8 Bridge on DN71 over Valea Titei at km 79+563 ..................................................................... 32
5.9 Bridge on DN71 over Valea Gae at km 82+544 ..................................................................... 32
5.10 Bridge on DN71 over railroad at km 82+135 ........................................................................ 38
5.11 Bridge on DN71 over river Ialomita at km 82+544 ................................................................ 42
5.12 Bridge on DN71 over Valea Lupului at km 82+238 ............................................................... 46
4/49
5/49
At the last limit state, the maximum bending moment is in the middle and has a value of
3785 kN x m, resulting in a total 21 beams needed TBP15 (7 5) from S1860 (a moment
capable of 3800kN x m)
At the last limit state, the maximum bearing shear force is on the support and has a value of
835 kN, resulting 10 stirrups with 2 branches in the support area at 15cm, 30cm
respectively in the middle (with a shear force capable of 940 kN maximum.)
At the service limit state , considering a pulling force of 190kN, the following resulted:
6/49
TRANSFER
Axial
Moment
[kN]
[kN x m]
-3612
514
-1743
Unified effort
Characteristics
2
Fiber
A [m ]
I [m ]
0.3736
0.0505
Conditions
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
0.000
Above beam
1.013
< 2.456
C.G. strands
-20.378
> -24
Below beam
-22.558
> -24
Unified effort
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-2.163
<0
Above beam
-5.938
<0
C.G. strands
-8.102
<0
Below beam
-8.323
<0
CVASIPEMANENT
Axial
Moment
Characteristics
[kN]
[kN x m]
A [m2]
528
721
+306
+364.5
Moment
[kN x m]
1261
0.606
I [m4]
Fiber
0.094
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Unified
Characteristics
effort
Fiber
A [m2] I [m4]
0.606
0.094
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-7.870
> -30
Above beam
-9.228
> -30
C.G. strands
1.159
< 3.684
Below beam
2.217
< 3.684
FREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
Characteristics
[kN x m]
A [m2] I [m4]
775
0.606
0.094
Fiber
Unified
effort
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-5.667
< -1
Above beam
-7.958
< -1
C.G. strands
-2.416
< -1
Below beam
-1.851
< -1
7/49
Moment
[kN x m]
1009
0.606
0.094
[N/mm2]
Conditions
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-6.728
Above beam
-8.570
C.G. strands
-0.693
< 2.456
Below beam
-0.109
< 2.456
5.1.3 Infrastructures
5.1.3.1 Joint elevation-foundation
In the joint elevation foundation, the seismic grouping turned out to be the worst , with an
axial force of compression of 4950 kN and a bending moment to the value of 12 775 kN xm ,
resulting in a reinforcement with beams 22 BST 500S at 15 cm on all section edges.
N = 8030 kN
MB = 29630 kN x m
ML = 29815 kN x m
8/49
9/49
TRANSFER
Axial
Moment
Characteristics
[kN]
[kN x m]
A [m2]
-1676
42.5
-198.7
I [m4]
0.1513
0.0038
Unified effort
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
0.000
Above beam
2.561
< 2.657
C.G. strands
-15.357
> -27
Below beam
-18.270
> -27
Unified effort
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-1.110
<0
Above beam
-10.276
<0
C.G. strands
-8.003
<0
Below beam
-7.634
<0
Fiber
CVASIPEMANENT
Axial
Moment
Characteristics
[kN]
[kN x m]
A [m2]
244
155
+25.5
+84.5
Moment
[kN x m]
435.6
0.313
I [m4]
0.02044
Fiber
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Unified
Characteristics
effort
Fiber
A [m2] I [m4]
0.313
0.02044
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-8.597
> -30
Above beam
-12.436
> -30
C.G. strands
-0.634
< 3.985
Below beam
1.286
< 3.985
10/49
FREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
Characteristics
[kN x m]
A [m2] I [m4]
294.85
Moment
[kN x m]
348.48
0.313
0.02044
Fiber
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-6.178
< -1
Above beam
-11.738
< -1
C.G. strands
-3.015
< -1
Below beam
-1.596
< -1
0.313
0.02044
Conditions
[N/mm2]
Conditions
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-7.100
Above beam
-12.004
C.G. strands
-2.108
< 2.657
Below beam
-0.498
< 2.657
Moment
Shear force
(kN x m) / m
(kN) / m
Cement
5.3
7.15
CTP
4.6
7.6
Utile
2.1
4.5
SLU
16.2
26
Stage
11/49
N = 3000 kN
MB = 7678 kN x m
ML = 1434 kN x m
12/49
Although the new work load resulting from intervention generated sectional efforts
approximately 70 % higher in all structural elements , these increases are not significant, resulting in
sections as reinforced constructively as like the other details or elements.
13/49
14/49
At the last limit state, the maximum bending moment is in the middle and has a value of
2716 kN xm , resulting in a total 20 beams needed TBP15 (7 5) from S1860, which
correspond to a capable moment of 2,840 kN xm
At the last limit state, the maximum bearing shear force is on the support and has a value of
697 kN, resulting 10 stirrups with 2 branches in the support area at 10cm in bearing zone
(with a shear force of 956 kN capable ) 20/30cm respectively in the middle.
At the service limit state , considering a pulling force of 205kN, the following resulted:
Axial
[kN]
-3680
Moment
[kN x m]
416
-1168
TRANSFER
Characteristics
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
Above plate
Above beam
0.411
0.033
C.G. strands
Below beam
Unified effort
[N/mm2]
Conditions
[N/mm2]
0
0.406
-15.704
-17.31
< 2.247
> -21
> -21
15/49
Axial
[kN]
Moment
[kN x m]
244
618
+61.4
+254.5
Moment
[kN x m]
916.5
CVASIPEMANENT
Characteristics
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
Above plate
Above beam
0.611
0.0665
C.G. strands
Below beam
Unified effort
[N/mm2]
Conditions
[N/mm2]
-1.171
-7.372
-6.79
-6.732
<0
<0
<0
<0
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Unified
Characteristics
effort
Conditions
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-7.096
> -21
Above beam
-10.817
> -21
0.611
0.0665
C.G. strands
-0.209
< 3.37
Below beam
0.848
< 3.37
FREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
566.8
Moment
[kN x m]
733.2
Characteristics
2
A [m ]
0.611
Fiber
I [m ]
0.0665
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
-4.835
-9.503
-2.72
-2.044
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< -1
< -1
< -1
< -1
16/49
Elevation
17/49
4480
Moment
[kN x m]
-1482
Geometric
characteristics
A [m2]
I [m4]
0.6207
0.6483
0.9348
0.2675
0.2857
0.3692
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
Fiber
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
0.000
-7.821
-10.3698
-12.069
Conditions
[N/mm2]
0
< 2.657
> -27
> -27
CVASIPEMANENT
Moment
[kN x m]
3095
2085
Geometric
characteristics
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Fiber
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
-0.871
-12.872
-5.027
-0.103
Conditions
[N/mm2]
<0
<0
<0
<0
18/49
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
2120
Geometric
characteristics
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Fiber
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
-1.742
-13.394
-3.663
2.824
Conditions
[N/mm2]
> -30
> -30
< 3.985
< 3.985
FREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
1272
Geometric
characteristics
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Fiber
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
-1.402
-13.190
-4.195
0.483
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< -0.5
< -0.5
< -0.5
< -0.5
1696
Geometric
characteristics
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Fiber
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
Unified
effort
[N/mm2]
-1.579
-13.297
-3.918
2.335
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< 2.657
< 2.657
From the above tables it may be noted that the beams do not check in with the convoy
calculation frequency grouping LM1, but with convoys A30 and V80. Consequently, the bridge was
raised only at the bridges load class E, as is otherwise foreseen to proceed in Euronorms in terms
of old structures.
19/49
Stage
Concrete
CTP
Utile
SLU
Moment
(kN x m) / m
24
18
65
145
Shear force
(kN) / m
20
14
168.3
273.1
5.5.3 Infrastructures
Between the total weight of the initial superstructure and rehabilitated one, there are
differences of around 17 % , so there are no significant differences between the status of efforts in
infrastructure works before and after the designed ones.
20/49
21/49
22/49
According to the calculation made, the marginal beam emerged as the most solicited one so
that further results will be presented only for it in various sections from above (A-G) :
23/49
G
-4125
141.4
-78.7
Calculation section
Bending Moment
Effort on superior concrete
plate
Effort on superior metal
beam
Effort on inferior metal
beam
Calculation section
Effort on superior
concrete plate
Effort on superior metal
beam
Effort on inferior metal
beam
[N / mm2]
E
-6200
F
6760
G
-6520
-3.5
4.2
-4.5
-3.5
3.4
-3.7
3.6
-11.1
13.3
-14.3
-11.0
10.7
-11.6
11.2
76.2
-91.2
98.1
75.7
-73.4
80.0
-77.2
[N /
mm2]
D
6395
Verification
Comp<23.33
-6
-9
-6
-6
-111
312
-217
-136
237
-130
245
<335
177
-332
286
196
-272
197
-283
<335
7136
5611
5857
2032
1632
1832
7247
5711
63294
24/49
R3
1730
4330
0.4
R4
2525
6490
0.4
R5
2525
6490
0.4
Since the dimensionless factor = VEd/ VRd is always kept below 0.5 its no longer necessary to
check the loss of stability of the heart by buckling or bending moment in combination with shear
force.
Stage
Cement
CTP
Utile
SLU
Moment
(kN x m) / m
10.8
7.7
5.23
32
Shear force
(kN) / m
11.15
10
5
35.3
25/49
0.5xSeism+0.5x Temperature
Adopted
[cm]
[cm]
3.55
3.22
15.33
16.31
[cm]
10.00
20.00
sectional Effort
Nmax = 5830 kN, Nmin=-475 kN
2.
3.
Vmax = 580 kN
5.6.6.1
For piles 1500mm with 25.00m sheet with a slab foundation level of 2.00m , to
obtain maximum lifting capacity of 6820 kN under compression (compared to 5830 kN maximum
effort ) , composed of 3275 kN and peak pressure of 3545 kN of mantle friction. Tensile load bearing
capacity of 1470 kN is calculated (compared to maximum tractive effort of 475 kN of the pilot).
5.6.6.2
For reinforcement 32 bars 28BST 500S were able to obtain a moment 4480 kN xm
(compared to 4060 when computing kN xm ) with an axial force of 485 kN corresponding capable
(compared to axial force of 560kN computing).
26/49
5.6.6.3
For Spiral reinforcement 10 BST 500S to step 10cm to obtain a shear force of 1720
kN capable ( versus shear calculation with a value of 580 kN). To mention that after the first 10.00m
, up to 20cm can be increased.
27/49
28/49
According to the calculation made, the marginal beam emerged as the most solicited one so
that further results will be presented only for it in various sections from above (R1, C1, R2, C2):
29/49
C1
604.8
828.8
414.4
2457.5
1076.2
7265.3
Section
R1
-1244.7
-1705.7
-852.9
-1491.6
-1581.1
-9282.5
C2
699.3
958.3
479.2
2607.5
1231.7
8067.5
R1
180.9
180.9
180.9
671.8
257.7
1987.5
Section
C1
R2
86.4
324.0
86.4
324.0
86.4
324.0
387.2
688.4
137.7
399.8
1058.5 2781.3
C2
0.0
0.0
0.0
329.1
115.4
600.1
30/49
Console plate
Stage
Concrete
CTP
Utile
SLU
Moment
kN x m
122.4
96.26
242
621.9
Shear
force
kN
76.5
50.4
200
441.3
Plate between
beams
Shear
Moment
force
kN x m
kN
42.9
52
14.1
17.7
165
100
300
228.3
To attain the bending moment on the console, revealed the area of reinforcement required to
be 4806mm2. Reinforcement with beams was adopted 16 BST 500S at 15cm, an effective area of
4825mm2.
To attain the bending moment between beams, revealed the area of reinforcement required to
be 2267mm2. Reinforcement with beams was adopted 16 BST 500S at 15cm, an effective area of
4825mm2.
Due to the large thickness of the slab is not necessary to retrieve vertical shear reinforcement
, concrete strength is sufficient for taking such efforts.
32/49
At the last limit state, the maximum bending moment is in the middle and has a value of
5840 kN xm , resulting in a total 26 beams needed TBP15 (7 5) from S1860 (with a
capable moment 6130 kN x m).
33/49
At the last limit state, the maximum bearing shear force is on the support and has a value of
1197 kN, resulting 14 stirrups with 2 branches in the support area ( value of shear force
capable of 1436 kN) at 20cm , 30cm respectively in the middle.
At the service limit state , considering a pulling force of 160kN, the following resulted:
Axial
[kN]
Moment
[kN x m]
-4002
387
-1975
Axial
[kN]
Moment
[kN x m]
596.8
631
+1070
+590
Moment
[kN x m]
1865
Moment
[kN x m]
1195
Moment
[kN x m]
1495
TRANSFER
Characteristics
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
Above plate
Above beam
0.3756 0.0674
C.G. strands
Below beam
CVASIPEMANENT
Characteristics
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
Above plate
Above beam
1.212
0.204
C.G. strands
Below beam
Stress
[N/mm2]
Conditions
[N/mm2]
0
< 2.456
> -24
> -24
0.000
1.369
-21.143
-23.236
Stress
[N/mm2]
-2.971
-2.960
-8.276
-9.242
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Stress
Characteristics
Fiber
2
4
A [m ]
I [m ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-7.636
Above beam
-3.252
1.212
0.204
C.G. strands 2.535
Below beam
3.587
FREQUENT GROUPING
Stress
Characteristics
Fiber
2
4
A [m ]
I [m ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-5.862
Above beam
-3.141
1.212
0.204
C.G. strands -1.577
Below beam
-1.293
INFREQUENT GROUPING
Stress
Characteristics
Fiber
2
4
A [m ]
I [m ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-6.703
Above beam
-3.193
1.212
0.204
C.G. strands 0.372
Below beam
1.021
Conditions
[N/mm2]
<0
<0
<0
<0
Conditions
[N/mm2]
> -26.67
> -26.67
< 3.685
< 3.685
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< -1
< -1
< -1
< -1
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< 2.456
< 2.456
34/49
At the last limit state, the maximum bending moment is in the middle and has a value of
4960 kN x m, covered by the capable moment given by the beam in collaboration with the
thicker plate calculated at 5685 kN x m
At the last limit state , the maximum bearing shear force is 1047 kN , covered by the capable
shear force with value 1457 kN , corresponding to stirrup reinforcement 8 from PC52 with 2
branches in the support area at 5cm , 10,20cm respectively towards the middle.
35/49
At the service limit state , considering a pulling force of 109kN, the following resulted
Moment
[kN]
[kN x m]
-3590
Stress
Characteristics
4
A [m ]
-1435
Fiber
I [m ]
0.3756
0.0675
Conditions
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
0.000
Above beam
-0.127
< 2.247
C.G. strands
-15.906
> -21
Below beam
-17.854
> -21
CVASIPEMANENT
Moment
Characteristics
[kN x m]
A [m2]
1897
1.213
Stress
Fiber
I [m4]
0.205
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-2.364
<0
Above beam
-5.933
<0
C.G. strands
-7.755
<0
Below beam
-8.068
<0
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Moment
Characteristics
[kN x m]
A [m2] I [m4]
1415
1.213
0.205
Stress
Fiber
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-5.310
> -21
Above beam
-6.119
> -21
C.G. strands
-0.875
< 3.370
Below beam
0.027
< 3.370
FREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
1061
Characteristics
2
A [m ] I [m ]
1.213
0.205
Stress
Fiber
Conditions
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-4.574
< -1
Above beam
-6.073
< -1
C.G. strands
-2.595
< -1
Below beam
-1.997
< -1
36/49
INFREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
1132
Characteristics
2
A [m ] I [m ]
1.213
0.205
Stress
Fiber
[N/mm ]
Above plate
-4.574
Above beam
-6.073
C.G. strands
-2.251
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< 2.247
Below beam
-1.592
< 2.247
From the above tables it may be noted that the beams do not check in with the convoy
calculation frequency grouping LM1, but with convoys A30 and V80. Consequently, the bridge was
raised only at the bridges load class E, as is otherwise foreseen to proceed in Euronorms in terms
of old structures.
N = 6420 kN
MB = 11000 kN x m
ML = 10995 kN x m
37/49
38/49
TRANSFER
Axial
Moment
[kN]
[kN x m]
-2437
62.5
-242.3
Characteristics
2
A [m ]
I [m ]
0.1513
Stress
Fiber
0.0038
Conditions
2
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
0.000
Above beam
0.075
< 2.657
C.G. strands
-19.717
> -27
Below beam
-23.894
> -27
Stress
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-1.566
<0
Above beam
-18.131
<0
C.G. strands
-10.354
<0
Below beam
-8.713
<0
CVASIPEMANENT
Axial
Moment
Characteristics
[kN]
[kN x m]
A [m2]
380
220
+37.5
+123.8
0.313
Fiber
I [m4]
0.02044
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPINGS
Moment
[kN x m]
557.6
Characteristics
2
A [m ] I [m ]
0.313
0.02044
Fiber
Stress
Conditions
2
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-11.137
> -30
Above beam
-20.934
> -30
C.G. strands
-1.533
< 3.985
Below beam
2.562
< 3.985
39/49
FREQUENT GROUPINGS
Moment
Characteristics
[kN x m]
A [m2] I [m4]
372.7
0.313
0.02044
Stress
Conditions
[N/mm2]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-7.964
< -1
Above beam
-20.004
< -1
C.G. strands
-4.458
< -1
Below beam
-1.177
< -1
Fiber
INFREQUENT GROUPINGS
Moment
[kN x m]
446.1
Characteristics
2
A [m ] I [m ]
0.313
0.02044
Fiber
Stress
Conditions
2
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-9.223
Above beam
-20.373
C.G. strands
-3.297
< 2.657
Below beam
0.307
< 2.657
Moment
Shear force
(kN x m) / m
(kN) / m
Concrete
5.3
7.15
CTP
4.6
7.6
Utile
2.1
4.5
SLU
16.2
26
Stage
40/49
N = 3000 kN
MB = 7678 kN x m
ML = 1434 kN x m
41/49
42/49
[kN]
-7203
Moment
[kN x m]
1645
-6003
Geometric
calculations
A [m2]
I [m4]
0.646
0.2857
Fiber
Stress
[N/mm2]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
0.000
1.336
-22.593
-24.379
Conditions
[N/mm2]
0
< 2.657
> -27
> -27
43/49
CVASIPEMANENT
Axial
Moment
[kN]
[kN x m]
815
3693
1657
1168
Geometric
calculations
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Stress
Fiber
[N/mm ]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
Conditions
[N/mm2]
-1.942
-9.344
-6.051
-5.805
<0
<0
<0
<0
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
3269
Geometric
calculations
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Stress
Fiber
[N/mm ]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
-4.786
-10.507
0.825
1.671
Conditions
[N/mm2]
> -30
> -30
< 3.985
< 3.985
FREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
1922
Geometric
calculations
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Stress
Fiber
[N/mm ]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
-3.674
-10.052
-1.862
-1.251
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< -1
< -1
< -1
< -1
INFREQUENT GROUPING
Moment
[kN x m]
2615
Geometric
calculations
A [m2]
I [m4]
1.5601
1.1971
Fiber
Stress
2
[N/mm ]
Above plate
Above beam
C.G. strands
Below beam
-4.217
-10.274
-0.55
0.176
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< 2.657
< 2.657
From the above tables it may be noted that the beams do not check in with the convoy
calculation frequency grouping LM1, but with convoys A30 and V80. Consequently, the bridge was
raised only at the bridges load class E, as is otherwise foreseen to proceed in Euronorms in terms
of old structures.
44/49
Stage
Cement
CTP
Utile
SLU
Moment
(kN x m) / m
24
18
65
145
Shear Force
(kN) / m
20
14
168.3
273.1
5.11.3 Infrastructures
Between the total weight of the initial superstructure and rehabilitated one, there are
differences of around 12 % , so there are no significant differences between the status of efforts in
infrastructure works before and after the designed ones.
45/49
46/49
At the last limit state, the maximum bending moment is in the middle and has a value of
2716 kN x m, resulting in a total 20 beams needed TBP15 (7 5) from S1860 (a moment
capable of 2840 kN x m)
At the last limit state, the maximum bearing shear force is on the support and has a value of
697 kN, resulting 10 stirrups with 2 branches in the support area at 10cm, 30cm
respectively in the middle (with a shear force capable of 956 kN maximum.)
At the service limit state , considering a pulling force of 205kN, the following resulted:
47/49
Axial
[kN]
Moment
[kN x m]
-3680
416
-1168
Axial
[kN]
Moment
[kN x m]
244
618
+61.4
+254.5
Moment
[kN x m]
916.5
Moment
[kN x m]
566.8
Moment
[kN x m]
733.2
TRANSFER
Characteristics
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
Above plate
Above beam
0.411
0.033
C.G. strands
Below beam
CVASIPEMANENT
Characteristics
Fiber
A [m2]
I [m4]
Above plate
Above beam
0.611
0.0665
C.G. strands
Below beam
Stress
2
[N/mm ]
0
0.406
-15.704
-17.31
Stress
2
[N/mm ]
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< 2.247
> -21
> -21
Conditions
[N/mm2]
-1.171
-7.372
-6.79
-6.732
<0
<0
<0
<0
CHARACTERISTIC GROUPING
Stress
Characteristics
Conditions
Fiber
2
4
2
A [m ]
I [m ]
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-7.096
> -21
Above beam
-10.817
> -21
0.611
0.0665
C.G. strands
-0.209
< 3.37
Below beam
0.848
< 3.37
FREQUENT GROUPING
Stress
Characteristics
Fiber
2
4
A [m ]
I [m ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-4.835
Above beam
-9.503
0.611
0.0665
C.G. strands -2.72
Below beam
-2.044
Conditions
[N/mm2]
< -1
< -1
< -1
< -1
INFREQUENT GROUPING
Stress
Characteristics
Conditions
Fiber
2
4
2
A [m ]
I [m ]
[N/mm ]
[N/mm2]
Above plate
-5.911
> -21
Above beam
-10.128
> -21
0.611
0.0665
C.G. strands
-1.525
< 2.247
Below beam
-0.668
< 2.247
48/49
For the maximum calculated reaction of 651 kN , neoprene bearings type 5 are proposed, with
dimensions of 200x300x30mm, the load capacity of 900kN and horizontal deformations up to
14.4mm, respective 6 mobile with 200x300x41mm dimensions, bearing capacity of 900kN and
horizontal deformations of 21.6mm.
5.12.3 Infrastructures
Among the total weight of the initial superstructure and the new one are differences of less
than 5% , so there are no significant differences between the efforts status of substructure works
designed before and after.
Verified,
ing. Strambu Stefan
Drafted,
ing. Urdareanu Vlad
49/49