Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Type
Author(s): Bruce J. Avolio, David A. Waldman and Michael A. McDaniel
Source: The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Jun., 1990), pp. 407-422
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/256331
Accessed: 10-09-2015 11:42 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/256331?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Academy of Management is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Academy of Management
Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
There is a growing awareness that issues regarding the aging of employees will take on increasing importance for human resources management in
upcoming years (McLaughlin, 1989; Rosen, 1988). The percentage of older
employees in the total United States' work force will continue to grow as the
baby boom generation ages. At the same time, fewer younger workers will be
available because of the decline in the number of children born during the
1970s and 1980s referred to as the "baby bust" (McLaughlin, 1989). Signaling those trends, in 1975 the average age of the members of the U.S. work
force was 28 years; by the early 1990s, the average age will jump to 40 years
(Rosen, 1988).
Many employers expect that a shift in the age composition of the work
force will exacerbate promotional bottlenecks at the upper levels of organizations and labor shortages at the entry level. In response to these concerns,
many organizations have begun to confront the problem of promotional bottlenecks by introducing lucrative "buy-out" packages to encourage older
employees to retire early (Howard, 1988).
Other factors promoting the increasing awareness of issues involving
older workers include recent concerns over the financial stability of the
"Social Security" system; enactment of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, amended in 1978; problems of worker obsolescence; explosive growth in the number of age discrimination cases filed over the last
ten years (Rosen, 1988; Sparrow & Davies, 1988); and the 1986 removal of
mandatory retirement for most occupations. Such legislation exempts a few
407
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
408
Academy of ManagementJournal
June
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1990
409
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
410
Academy of ManagementJournal
June
burnout. Consistent with this argument was Sparrow and Davies's (1988)
report that the strength of the relationship between age and the quality of job
performance depended on the level of a job's complexity. Peak performance
occurred at a significantly higher mean age in jobs involving greater levels of
task complexity. Long-term experience working in such jobs may also help
maintain an individual's cognitive abilities more than experience in less
cognitively engaging jobs (Avolio & Waldman, 1987). Thus, we expected that
an occupational classification scheme taking aspects of complexity and mastery into account would help account for systematic differences in the relationship of age and work performance. In sum,
Hypothesis 2: Occupational type will moderate the linear
relationship between work performance and age or experience. Specifically, age or experience in jobs requiring a
high level of skill or of professional mastery will explain
more variance than will age or experience in less complex
jobs.
Linearity Issues
An important theoretical possibility previous research has often overlooked is that age (or experience) may be nonlinearly related to work performance for many jobs. Schmidt, Hunter, Outerbridge, and Goff (1988) predicted that experience beyond the level needed to perform a job maximally
would not benefit performance and might actually be detrimental. Their
reasoning was that the most important gains in performance attributable to
experience are typically realized early in a career, with returns diminishing
over time. Research evidence to date has provided mixed evidence regarding
the presence of a plateauing effect (Lawrence, 1988; McDaniel et al., 1988;
McEvoy & Cascio, 1989). Remaining unanswered is the question of the generalizability of nonlinear plateauing in work performance in different occupations over peoples' life spans.
The same types of occupational qualities that serve to enhance linear
relationships between work performance and age and experience will also
reduce nonlinear plateauing effects. In jobs requiring high levels of skill and
mastery, the experience learning curve should be more gradual than it is in
less complex jobs, so gains in performance can accrue from lengthy experience. Conversely, in jobs requiring lower levels of skill and mastery, people
should realize performance gains from experience sooner, resulting in a
more rapid plateauing of performance. Moreover, because of the potential for
boredom or burnout associated with such work, the performance pattern
may become negative for older employees. Mathematically, this pattern
could be mapped as an inverted U-shaped function. However, such instances should occur infrequently in work places because most older employees would voluntarily leave such situations to avoid failure or be dismissed or transferred into more suitable positions by their employers. Thus,
Hypothesis 3: Occupational type will moderate the nonlinear relationship between work performance and age or
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1990
411
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
412
June
ously, people may accumulate relevant knowledge and skills across jobs in
different organizational settings that can have an impact on their work performance.
Occupational classification. The 111 jobs were categorized in two ways.
First, we sorted the jobs into five occupational groups paralleling Gottfredson's (1986) occupational taxonomy, in which occupations are categorized
in terms of the work performed or the product produced and the skill and
intellectual levels required. Partitioning jobs into occupations based on
products produced should also improve the comparability of measures of
performance. Second, we gave two judges detailed definitions of the five
occupational categories and asked them to sort cards containing DOT job
descriptions and titles for each job into the categories. The agreement rate
between the two judges was about 81 percent. The two raters reclassified
jobs they initially classified into separate categories. When the raters could
not agree on a job's placement into an occupational group, it was dropped
from further analysis. The result was that 20,632 individuals from 97 of the
original 111 jobs were classified into the five general occupational groupings. A brief description of each occupational category and three representative jobs placed in the category for this research follow: Craft I jobs involve
inspection of finished products, monitoring activities, and perhaps routine
labor activities. Examples are machine tender, garment folder, and quality
control inspector. Craft II jobs involve tasks that require setting up complex
operations, doing fine detail work, operating several machines, using a variety of tools, repairing machinery or systems, and extensive training. Examples are electronics technician, construction equipment mechanic, and
welder. Clerical I jobs involve basic clerical functions like taking dictation,
transcribing and copying data, filing reports, and operating a typewriter.
Keypunch operator, stenotype operator, and inventory checker are examples. Clerical II jobs involve compiling records of transactions, verifying
data, updating filing systems, performing clerical work in searching and
investigating information contained in files, deciding on data to be put in
files, and making calculations and supplying written information from files.
Administrative clerk, medical records clerk, and classified ads clerk are
examples. Service jobs involve dealing directly with the public in providing
information, making suggestions, selling, and completing orders. Transportation agent, general salesperson, and waitress are sample jobs.
Work performance. Supervisors of respondents were asked to provide
performance ratings on six items representing the quantity, quality, and
accuracy of individuals' work and their job knowledge, efficiency, and overall performance. Responses were on 5-point scales. To rate accuracy, for
example, supervisors were asked "How accurate is the work of this
individual?", with responses ranging from "Makes very many mistakes.
Work needs constant checking," to "Rarely makes a mistake. Work almost
never needs checking." The six scales represent common dimensions of
work performance characteristic of a wide range of jobs (Landy & Farr, 1983).
Supervisors were informed that the ratings were being collected for
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1990
413
research purposes only. They were to keep the ratings confidential and not
show them to anyone in their companies. Supervisors were instructed not to
rate an individual unless that person had been under their supervision long
enough to allow for accurate performance ratings. Other instructions or cautions to supervisors included rating on the basis of typical performance
rather than on the basis of unique incidents and not letting general impressions or personal feelings about a worker affect ratings.
In general, each supervisor provided two sets of ratings, one week apart.
The mean summed value of the ratings collected first was 21.75 (s.d. = 4.26).
The mean summed value for the second set was 21.71 (s.d. = 4.29). Testretest reliability for these ratings was .82. The internal consistency of the first
ratings (x) was .91, and for the second set it was .93. Thus, in order to form
a single, more reliable criterion, we summed the two sets of ratings for the
present analyses. The mean value for this overall score was 43.46 (s.d. =
8.17).
Analyses
Hierarchical polynomial regression analysis (Cohen & Cohen, 1975) was
used to test the hypotheses. For each of the five occupational groupings, we
first entered age into a regression equation predicting work performance. We
entered an age-squared term representing the quadratic function second,
experience third, and an experience-squared term last. If nonlinearity had
been present in the relationships between performance and age or experience, the higher-order squared terms should have accounted for increments
in R2. In addition, a positive beta coefficient would have indicated a potential U-shaped relationship, whereas a negative beta coefficient would have
indicated an inverted U-shaped relationship (Kacmar & Ferris, 1989).
As Cohen and Cohen noted (1975: 100-102), a particular advantage of
the hierarchical regression approach is that it overcomes some of the problems due to multicollinearity among independent variables like age and
experience. Ordering independent variables a priori into a regression equation facilitates the interpretation of the amount of unique, semipartial variance for which they account.
RESULTS
For the overall data, the correlations between age and performance and
experience and performance were .07 and .18, respectively. Table 1 shows
means, standard deviations, and correlations among age, experience, and
performance for each of the five occupational types. Across occupations,
there was a general tendency for experience to be more highly correlated
with performance than was age. In addition, and as expected, there were
differences across occupational types, with higher correlations between performance and age or experience occurring for the craft II and clerical II
categories, which include jobs with more skill complexity than jobs in the
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
414
June
TABLE 1
Means, Standard Deviations, and Intercorrelations by Occupational Type
Intercorrelations
Variablesa
Craft I
Age
Experience
Performance
Craft II
Age
Experience
Performance
Clerical I
Age
Experience
Performance
Clerical II
Age
Experience
Performance
Service
Age
Experience
Performance
Age x
Experience
Age x
Performanceb
Experience
x
Performancec
Means
s.d.
34.60
5.88
43.68
11.44
6.51
8.05
.60
.06 (-.03)
.13 (.12)
33.25
7.66
42.81
10.63
7.89
8.06
.69
.13 (-.04)
.23 (.19)
29.05
4.68
43.64
10.68
5.08
8.09
.61
-.03 (-.12)
.10 (.15)
29.45
4.79
44.56
10.50
5.59
8.19
.63
.11 (-.04)
.23 (.20)
31.50
5.21
43.89
11.11
5.59
8.47
.59
.05 (-.06)
.12 (.13)
a
Experience and age are reported in years. For the occupational types in the order listed,
N = 3,301, 9,008, 2,125, 2,937, and 3,261.
b
The values in parentheses are the correlations between age and performance with experience controlled.
c The values in
parentheses are the correlations between experience and performance with
controlled.
age
craft I and clerical I categories (Gottfredson, 1986). Table 1 also shows how
the age and performance correlations seemed to drop substantially when
experience was controlled. Conversely, the experience and performance relationships changed very little when age was controlled. The partial correlations confirmed the findings of previous research (Giniger, Dispenzieri, &
Eisenberg, 1983; Schwab & Heneman, 1977).
Table 2 shows the results of the hierarchical polynomial regression analyses. As Hypothesis 1 predicted, for each occupational type, experience
adds significantly to the prediction of performance beyond the contributions
of age and age squared. The R2 terms for age and experience tend to be
highest for craft II and clerical II occupations, showing modest support for
Hypothesis 2. For example, the AR2 experience term for craft I occupations
was .017, as compared to .040 for craft II occupations. Little support emerged
for Hypothesis 3 in that the age-squared and experience-squared terms consistently accounted for a small and uniform percentage of variance across the
five occupational types. One possible exception was that the AR2age-squared
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
TABLE 2
Results of Hierarchical Regression Analysisa
CraftI
Predictor
Predictor
R2R2
Variables
Age
Age squared
Experience
Experience squared
.45
-.51
.41
-.26
.004
.012
.029
.037
OccupationalTypes
Clerical I
CraftII
2
222
.004
.008
.017
.008
R2
.34
-.40
.54
-.28
.018
.026
.066
.073
22
.018
.008
.040
.007
.21
-.58
.38
-.21
large
numbrsofpeopeineachgroua
o te
.001
.019
.038
.045
.001
.018
.019
.007
.0
-.16
.5
-.34
w~asdue2at
part
Theleastin
Most R2 values were statistically significant.
exception was age for clerical I and service occu
was due at least in part to the large numbers of people in each group.
a
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
416
June
term for clerical I occupations was slightly higher than the age-squared term
for clerical II occupations.
To help interpret the age-squared and experience-squared effects, we
provide plots of age and experience by performance in Figure 1. We created
five age groups using a categorization scheme similar to one employed by the
U.S. Department of Labor (cf. McLaughlin, 1989). The percentages of individuals in the 24-and-under, 25-29, 30-39, 40-54, 55-and-up age groups
were approximately 27, 21, 25, 21, and 6 percent. This distribution approximately represents the U.S. labor force although, as mentioned previously,
the pattern in recent years reflects a shift toward more representation of the
older groups. We partitioned experience so that similar percentages of individuals would be in the five experience and the five age groups. Figure 1
shows a consistent plateauing effect for both age and experience in relation
to performance across the five occupational types. Generally, there was no
evidence to support the existence of an inverted U-function relationship
between age and performance, although such an effect does appear to be
present for clerical I occupations, where a drop-off in performance is evident
for older employees.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study support the findings of earlier research and add
new information that may help to redirect future research on age and work
performance. In line with previous findings, length of job experience was a
better predictor of work performance than was age (Giniger et al., 1983;
McDaniel et al., 1988; McEnrue, 1988; Schwab & Heneman, 1977). However,
previous research has not been clear on the extent to which occupational
type might serve as a moderator or on the generality and nature of nonlinear
plateauing effects when age and experience are compared (cf., McEvoy &
Cascio, 1989). The present findings showed a modest moderating effect for
occupational type in that both age and experience predicted performance
better for jobs requiring higher levels of complexity or mastery than other
jobs. A consistent, nonlinear plateauing effect emerged for both age and
experience in relation to performance across the five occupational types.
Moreover, for lower-level clerical jobs, some tendency was found for a decline in performance among older employees.
The present study attempted to add to the existing literature by examining occupational differences at a more specific level of analysis than has
been done previously. The two most comprehensive examinations of previous research on age and work performance (McEvoy & Cascio, 1989; Waldman & Avolio, 1986) used a professional-nonprofessional
occupational
breakdown. The authors of both studies admitted that this sort of occupational breakdown might be too general, and each recommended a more detailed analysis of occupational type's effect on the age-performance relationship. Although the present study provided a somewhat more refined breakdown for nonmanagerial work, additional research is necessary for other
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1990
417
FIGURE 1
Performance Trends and Occupational Types
50 -
-- ---
48 -
.......
Clerical II
Clerical I
Craft II
. Craft I
-Service
Total
46 a)
,wl~.~
.-?
oo0
...??.
._.
44 -
N
,0
O
0-
"l
?---co
cD
c~
42 -
'^
~~~~r
~ ~~
/;L
C~
40 -
25-29
<25
30-39
40-54
>54
Age
50
48
46
44
42
40
a)
N.
N1
Nl\s
O
a)
CH
/
I
<2
Ii
2-3.9
4-7.9
8-20.9
>20.9
Years of Experience
418
June
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1990
419
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
420
June
productivity was the investment organizations made in training their workers. Accumulating new skills and upgrading old ones were the single best
predictors of earnings and productivity.
As long as organizations have policies based on the assumption that
younger workers offer more time before retirement in which a firm can
amortize the costs of training and reap its benefits, the likelihood of skills
obsolescence among senior employees remains high. From a purely economic perspective, the question that human resource practitioners must
address is whether the opportunity costs associated with training are more
or less than the opportunity costs associated with improving productivity
across a life span. Andrisani and Daymont's (1987) work demonstrated that
younger employees' earnings and performance may overtake those of older
perhaps
employees because of the direct investment that employers-and
in training. In sum, decisions to retain or
the younger employees-make
hire older employees and to take steps to maximize their performance will
have to be balanced with regard to costs and benefits, legal concerns, and
corporate responsibility regarding the development of all individuals, young
and old alike.
REFERENCES
Andrisani, P., & Daymont, T. 1987. Age changes in productivity and earnings. In S. H. Sandell
(Ed.), The problem isn't age: Work and older Americans: 52-70. New York: Praeger.
Avolio, B. J., & Waldman, D. A. 1987. Personnel aptitude test scores as a function of age,
education and job type. Experimental Aging Research, 13: 109-113.
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. C. 1982. The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some
implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7:
560-569.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1975. Applied multiple regression/correlational
havioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. 1983. Equity theory and time: A reformulation. Academy of
Management Review, 8: 311-319.
Fossum, J. A., Arvey, R. D., Paradise, C. A., & Robbins, N. E. 1986. Modeling the skills obsolescence process: A psychological/economic integration. Academy of Management Review,
11: 362-374.
Giniger, S., Dispenzieri, A., & Eisenberg, J. 1983. Age, experience and performance in speed and
skill jobs in an applied setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 469-475.
Gottfredson, L. S. 1986. Occupational aptitude patterns map: Development and implications for
a theory of job aptitude requirements. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29: 254-291.
Gribbin, K., Schaie, K. W., & Parham, I. A. 1980. A complexity of life style and maintenance of
intellectual abilities. Journal of Social Issues, 36: 47-61.
Howard, A. 1988. Who reaches for the golden handshake? Academy of Management Executive, 2: 133-144.
Howard, A., & Bray, D. W. 1988. Managerial lives in transition: Advancing age and changing
times. New York: Guilford Press.
Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. 1989. Theoretical and methodological considerations
age-job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 201-207.
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
in the
1990
421
Labouvie-Vief, G., & Chandler, M. J. 1978. Cognitive development and life span theory: Idealistic versus contextual perspectives. In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), Lifespan development and behavior, vol. 1: 104-136. New York: Academic Press.
Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. 1983. The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory and
applications. New York: Academic Press.
Lawrence, B. S. 1988. New wrinkles in the theory of age: Demography, norms, and performance
ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 309-337.
McDaniel, M. A., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. 1988. Job experience correlates of performance.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 327-330.
McEnrue, M. D. 1988. Length of experience and the performance of managers in the establishment phase of their careers. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 175-185.
McEvoy, G. M., & Cascio, W. F. 1989. Cumulative evidence of the relationship between age and
job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 11-17.
McLaughlin, A. 1989. Labor market problems of older workers. Final report prepared for the
Department of Labor. Washington, D.C.: Division of Labor Force Statistics, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
Medoff, J. L., & Abraham, K. G. 1981. Are those paid more really more productive? The case of
experience. Journal of Human Resources, 16: 186-216.
Motowidlo, S. J., Packard, J. S., & Manning, M. R. 1986. Occupational stress: Its causes and
consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 618-629.
Rhodes, S. R. 1983. Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93: 328-367.
Rosen, B. 1988. Managing the sunset years: Employer and employee perspectives. Paper
presented at the national meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology,
Dallas.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. 1986. Impact of job experience and ability on
job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of performance. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 71: 432-439.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A. N., & Goff, S. 1988. Joint relation of experience and
ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73:
46-57.
Schwab, D. P., & Heneman, H. G. III 1977. Effects of age and experience on productivity. Industrial Gerontology, 4: 113-117.
Slocum, J. W., Jr., Cron, W. L., Hansen, R. W., & Rawlings, S. 1985. Business strategy and the
management of plateaued employees. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 133-154.
Sparrow, P. R., & Davies, D. R. 1988. Effects of age, tenure, training, and job complexity on
technical performance. Psychology and Aging Journal, 3: 307-314.
Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B. J. 1986. A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 33-38.
Waldman, D. A., & Spangler, W. D. 1989. Putting together the pieces: A closer look at the
determinants of job performance. Human Performance, 2: 29-59.
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
422
June
Bruce J. Avolio received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Akron's psychology
department in 1982 in the area of industrial/organizational/gerontological psychology.
He is currently an associate professor in the Human Resource Management group in the
School of Management at SUNY-Binghamton. His current research interests include the
study of aging and work issues and development of leadership.
David A. Waldman received his Ph.D. Degree from Colorado State University in 1982
in the area of industrial/organizational psychology. He is currently an associate professor in the Human Resource Management group in the School of Management at SUNYBinghamton. His current research interests include the study of aging and work issues,
and leadership in relation to the process of innovation.
Michael A. McDaniel received his Ph.D. degree in the area of industrial/organizational
psychology from George Washington University in 1986. He is currently employed by
Booz, Allen, & Hamilton Inc., located in Bethesda, Maryland. His current research
interests include experience in relation to work performance and drug testing in the
work place.
This content downloaded from 14.139.186.178 on Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:42:17 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions