Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
Concerning Fasting
utrum per binam comestionem jejunium
solvatur.
ad quartum sic proceditur. videtur quod per Sub-article 1: It would seem not.
binam comestionem jejunium non solvatur.
quia jejunium est determinatum ad
subtractionem nutrimenti. sed non solum
nutrimur cibo, sed etiam potu. cum ergo
potus assumptus praeter comestionem
statutum ab ecclesia jejunium non solvat,
videtur quod nec etiam cibi bina assumptio.
ulterius. videtur quod esus carnium jejunium Sub-article 2: It would seem that the eating of meat
non solvat.
does not break the fast.
quia jejunium est institutum ad
comprimendum concupiscentiam. sed
vinum magis inflammat concupiscentiam
quam carnes. cum ergo potus vini non
solvat jejunium, nec esus carnium solvet.
praeterea, legumina inflativa sunt, et sic ad Objection 2: Furthermore, legumes make one
celebretur officium. ergo anticipatio temporis Therefore, anticipation of the time (of eating the
solvit jejunium.
fasting meal) breaks the fast.
respondeo dicendum ad primam
I respond to the 1st question (sub-article 1) saying
quaestionem, quod jejunium dupliciter
that the fast is broken in two ways. In one way, in
solvitur. uno modo quantum ad meritum, ita relation to (the) merit (that attends to the fast), so
quod homo vel non meretur, vel minus
that man either does not merit, or merits less (those
meretur; et de hac solutione jejunii non
things promised or gained by the fast). Concerning
intendimus ad praesens: quia conditiones this breaking of the fast, we do not intend (to
quae meritum alicujus actus augent vel
discuss) at the present moment. For the conditions
minuunt, indeterminatae sunt, eo quod
which either augment or diminish the merit of an
quandoque accidentaliter se habent ad
act are indeterminate, in that they are sometimes
actum meritorium. alio modo solvitur
accidentally related to the meritorious act. The
jejunium, secundum quod est ab ecclesia second way in which a fast is broken is said in
institutum; ex qua solutione homo efficitur relation to that which is instituted by the Church.
transgressor statuti ecclesiae de jejunio
Through this breaking, a man is made a
servando, vel saltem non observator, nisi ex transgressor of the statutes of the Church
dispensatione vel causa legitima dimittat; et concerning the observance of fasting; at the least,
de hac solutione jejunii nunc quaerimus.
he is not an observer (of those statutes), unless by
reason of a dispensation (that he has received), or
(that) he has been released through a legitimate
cause. Concerning this breaking of the (Church's)
fast, we here investigate (at the present moment).
ad hoc autem praecipue valet considerare
intentiones statuentis. intendit autem
ecclesia certum modum statuere
manducandi, ut scilicet semel in die
jejunans manducet; et ideo si aliquorum
sumptio, secundum quae manducatio solet
compleri, iteretur, jejunium praedicto modo
acceptum solvitur. si autem aliqua sumantur
quae ad manducandum de se ordinata non
sunt, sed ad alium usum, qui usus
communiter manducatio non vocatur; talis
cibi vel potus sumptio praeter
manducationem unam ante vel post, non
facit esse binam manducationem; et ideo
talis sumptio jejunium non solvit.
propter hoc nec statutum ecclesiae frangit, According to this, he does not break the statute of
nisi fraudem faciat: quia legem violat qui in the Church, except where he engages in a
fraudem legis aliquid facit.
deception. For he who does something so as to
deceive the law violates the law.
ad secundum dicendum, quod aqua etsi
solvat jejunium naturae, quia aliquo modo
nutrit; non tamen solvit jejunium ecclesiae;
quia ecclesia non attendit in statuendo id
quod quocumque modo nutrire potest, sed
id quod principaliter ad nutriendum
ordinatum est.
ad tertium dicendum, quod pisces frigidiores Response to the third objection: Fish are naturally
sunt naturaliter quam carnes, nec
colder than (other) meats; in this they do not
alimentum ita conveniens corpori praestant provide nourishment to the body like the other
sicut aliae carnes; unde non fuit tanta
meats. Hence it does not become as great a
necessitas prohibendi pisces, sicut carnes. necessity to prohibit fish in the same manner as
meat.
ad quartum dicendum, quod
quadragesimale jejunium arctius observatur
quam alia jejunia, quia eo christi jejunium
secundum modum nostrum imitamur; et
ideo, quamvis usus casei et ovorum in
quadragesima sit generaliter interdictus,
tamen in aliis jejuniis apud diversos in his
est diversus abstinentiae modus.
ad secundum dicendum, quod ea in quibus Response to the second objection: Those things in
non potest accipi certa mensura, non cadunt which a certain measure cannot be taken, do not
sub determinatione legislatoris. et quia non fall under the determination of the legislator. Since
potest accipi certa mensura in quantitate
a certain measure cannot be taken in the quantity
cibi vel aliis conditionibus numeratis, sicut of food or in the other conditions enumerated, for
in tempore accipi potest; ideo conditiones this reason the conditions of the other four do not
aliae quatuor non cadunt sub
fall under the determination of the Church's
determinatione praecepti ecclesiae; et ideo precepts. And so, although he sins through a lack
quamvis per inordinationem circa illas
of proper ordering concerning those circumstances,
circumstantias peccet, et meritum jejunii
and loses the merit of fasting either in whole or in
amittat vel in toto vel in parte, non tamen
part, nevertheless the statute of the Church is not
ecclesiae statutum transgreditur; et ideo
transgressed. And so the fast is not broken.
jejunium non solvit.
Stephen Loughlin
(sjl1@desales.edu)