Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gabriel Luque
000185-060
x
Time
(s)
Start:
411.63g
End: 410.7g
y
Temp
(C)
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
0
3
7
11
15
19
23
27
240
31
Time
Temp error
error (s)
(C)
0,2
0,2
0,2
0,2
0,2
0,2
0,2
0,2
0,2
%error time
%error temp
#DIV/0!
0,666666667
0,333333333
0,222222222
0,166666667
0,133333333
0,111111111
0,095238095
#DIV/0!
33,33333333
14,28571429
9,090909091
6,666666667
5,263157895
4,347826087
3,703703704
Mass
error (g)
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
1 0,083333333 3,225806452
0,01
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
35
30
normal
y = 0,1275x
Temperature
25
20
min gradient
y = 0,1206x + 1,0241
15
10
max gradient
y = 0,1377x - 1,0275
5
0
-50
50
-5
P=220.43W17.64W
100
150
Time (s)
200
250
300
Second
x
y
Time Temp
Time
Temp error
(s)
(C)
error (s)
(C)
0
0
0,2
30
2
0,2
60
5,5
0,2
90
9,5
0,2
120
13,5
0,2
150
18
0,2
180
22
0,2
210
27
0,2
Start:
414.1g
End:
413.47g
240
31
0,2
%error time
%error temp
#DIV/0!
0,666666667
0,333333333
0,222222222
0,166666667
0,133333333
0,111111111
0,095238095
#DIV/0!
50
18,18181818
10,52631579
7,407407407
5,555555556
4,545454545
3,703703704
Mass
error (g)
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
1 0,083333333 3,225806452
0,01
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
35
30
normal
y = 0,1233x
Temperature
25
20
Min gradiennt
15
y = 0,1206x + 1,0241
10
Max gradient
5
y = 0,1377x - 1,0275
0
-50
0
-5
P=214.45W25.05W
50
100
150
Time (s)
200
250
300
Third
x
y
Time Temp
Time
Temp error
(s)
(C)
error (s)
(C)
0
0
0,2
30
3
0,2
60
7
0,2
90
11
0,2
120
16
0,2
150
20
0,2
180
24
0,2
210
27,5
0,2
Start:
414,32g
End: 413.49
240
31,5
0,2
%error time
%error temp
#DIV/0!
0,666666667
0,333333333
0,222222222
0,166666667
0,133333333
0,111111111
0,095238095
#DIV/0!
33,33333333
14,28571429
9,090909091
6,25
5
4,166666667
3,636363636
Mass
error (g)
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
1 0,083333333 3,174603175
0,01
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
35
Normal
y = 0,1311x
30
Temperature
25
Max gradient
20
y = 0,1398x - 1,028
15
min gradient
10
y = 0,1227x + 1,0245
5
0
-50
0
-5
P=228.1W15.17W
50
100
Time (s)
150
200
250
300
Conclusion
For this experiment we wanted to calculate the power of a Bunsen burner. For this we
made three different trials with similar water masses in order to calculate the power. The
experiment consisted in heating a mass of water with a bunsen burner, recording every 30
seconds how much the water temperature had changed. We had to stir the water with a
glass stick in order to balance the heat all over the water, to make it a fair test.
Its possible to know the errors of time, mass and temperature by the apparatus used, and
with the formula of
we used a change in temperature, the errors are added, giving and error of 1C. For the
mass, we simply took the error of the digital weight; 0.01g. And finally for time we used
the ruler test in order to find displacement, and using the formula we find the time error.
After we finished the experiment we used the formula of energy which states that
being Q energy, m mass, c latent heat of water and T temperature. When the
formula is rearranged and knowing that
and from the graphs made with the data collected, we could calculate the
gradient and so finding power. We ended up with three results; 220.43W17.64W,
214.45W25.05W and 228.1W15.17W. For each of these results we obtained an
uncertainty of 8%, 11.7%, and 6.7%, respectively, which is almost nothing, so its possible
to trust our results. As the errors are so small, compared to the actual results, the
maximum and minimum gradient graphs wont differ that much, giving us a more accurate
result. The difference between the results were not big, the biggest was about 14W
(between the second and third trial), which means that our results were very accurate.
We measured the mass of the water before and after heating it, and we found out that it
had lower its value; this can be explained by the evaporation due to the heat. We found
out that the percentage mass lost was around 0.25%, so it almost didnt change, although
its possible to understand that this could increase as time passes and as power increases.
This error can be reduced with different methods, which are going to be explained in the
evaluation.
In conclusion its possible to state that the experiment was successful, because we didnt
have any big errors, and we were able to measure the actual power of the Bunsen burner.
After everything said above, the experiment was very accurate, and was done with
appropriate procedure.
Evaluation
Limitations
Total mass
Timing error
Evaporation of water
Mass measured
Beaker temperature
Effect
We didnt realize that we
should measure the mass of
the beaker before putting
water in it, so the mass of
the experiment is not totally
accurate
The reaction time of a
person is not exact, so the
person
watching
the
temperature would not
always measure it on time,
this will make the final
result differ as the graph will
change.
As water evaporates due to
temperature, the mass will
change and so the result.
The masses were not always
the same, so there was not
always the same amount of
water, this could change the
final power value.
The beaker needs to be
cooled down before the
next trial; otherwise the
temperature will increase
for the next trial.
If the aperture of the
Bunsen burner is changed
between trials, the power
will change to a lower or
grater one.
Improvement
Measure the weight of the
beaker before, so you can
subtract it from the final
mass.