Professional Documents
Culture Documents
982 to 987
#2010 The Japan Institute of Metals
Nickel-based superalloy grade IN738 has superior creep resistance, however, oxidation resistance is the main limitation of this alloy for
practical applications at high temperature. Coating of nickel aluminide compounds which have high oxidation resistance on the IN738 alloys
surface can remarkably increase the oxidation resistance by formation of Al2 O3 lm as protective layer. Aluminizing by powder liquid coating
methods is applied in this research. Mixed slurries of Al and Al2 O3 powders are pasted onto IN 738 samples and heated at 1273 K in argon
atmosphere for 3.6 to 14.4 ks (1 to 4 h). Slurries can be classied into four dierent ratios of Al : Al2 O3 : 10 : 0, 7 : 3, 5 : 5 and 3 : 7. The
microstructure was investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and optical microscope. Phases in the coated layer are characterized by
Glancing Incident-angle X-ray Diractometer (GIXD) and Electron Probe Micro Analysis (EPMA). The results show that the coated layer is
formed by dissolution of nickel into liquid aluminum at aluminizing temperature resulting in formation of intermetallic compound layer. The
coated layer consists of Ni2 Al3 as a main phase with small amount of NiAl3 and AlCr2 . AlCr2 exists mostly at the layer adjacent to the top
surface. For 8.1 and 14.4 ks (2.25 and 4 h) holding time, formation of AlCr2 at the interface of matrix and coated layer occurs due to diusion of
aluminum from coated layer into nickel matrix. The eect of time shows that longer aluminizing time leads to formation of a uniform coated
layer. The Al : Al2 O3 ratio of either 10 : 0 or 7 : 3 will create a uniform coated layer with thickness more than 200 mm.
[doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2009382]
(Received November 18, 2009; Accepted February 15, 2010; Published April 7, 2010)
Keywords: aluminizing, nickel aluminide, IN738, powder liquid coating
1.
Introduction
hotmail.com
Table 1
Element
Ni
Cr
Co
Ti
Al
Mo
Ta
mass%
Bal.
16.0
8.5
3.4
3.4
2.6
1.75
2.65
0.11
at%
Bal.
17.5
8.2
4.0
7.2
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.5
Experimental Procedure
983
Fig. 1 Cross-sectional microstructure of IN738 aluminized at 1273 K for 3.6 ks with Al : Al2 O3 ratio of (a) 10 : 0, (b) 7 : 3, (c) 5 : 5 and
(d) 3 : 7.
Table 2
Sample
No.
Al : Al2 O3
powder
ratio
10 : 0
7:3
5:5
3:7
10 : 0
7:3
5:5
3:7
10 : 0
10
7:3
11
5:5
12
3:7
Coating conditions.
Time
(ks)
Temperature
(K)
Atmosphere
3.6
(1 h)
1273
Argon
8.1
(2.25 h)
14.4
(4 h)
2.3 Characterization
Surface and cross-sectional microstructure of the coated
samples were observed by an optical microscope and a
scanning electron microscope (SEM). Energy dispersive
spectroscopy (EDS) and electron probe micro analysis
(EPMA) were performed to investigate the distribution of
elements in the coated layer. Phase formation in the coated
layer was characterized by an X-ray diractrometer (XRD)
and a glacing incident angle X-ray diractometer (GIXD) at
the incident angle of 5 degree.
3.
AlCr2
NiAl3
Ni2Al3
984
AlCr2
NiAl3
Ni2Al3
Fig. 3 GIXD proles of the sample aluminized at 1273 K for 3.6 ks using
Al : Al2 O3 ratio of 10 : 0 at the various depths from the surface.
Fig. 4 EDS analysis of aluminized sample at 1273 K for 3.6 ks with Al : Al2 O3 ratio of 7 : 3 (a) secondary electron image (b) distribution
of Ni (c) distribution of Al and (d) distribution of Cr.
985
Fig. 5 Cross-sectional microstructure of coating layer of dierent coating conditions; (a) sample No. 1, (b) sample No. 5, (c) sample No. 9,
(d) sample No. 2, (e) sample No. 6 and (f) sample No. 10.
100 m
Fig. 6 EDS analysis of aluminized sample at 1273 K for 8.1 ks with Al : Al2 O3 ratio of 7 : 3 (a) secondary electron image (b) distribution
of Ni (c) distribution of Al and (d) distribution of Cr.
986
Ni2Al3
Ni3Al
matrix
Interface
100 m
Coating
layer
main phase
3rd phase
2nd phase
Fig. 9 GIXD proles of the sample aluminized at 1273 K for 8.1 ks using
Al : Al2 O3 ratio of 7 : 3 at the various depths from the surface.
20 m
5 m
Fig. 7 Cross-sectional microstructure of (a) coating layer (b) enlarged
picture of coating layer and (c) enlarged picture at interface between
matrix and coating layer.
a
nd
2 phase
Fig. 10 EPMA analysis of interface of coated layer and IN738 (a) back
scattering elelctron image, distribution of Ni, Al and Cr.
rd
3 phase
main phase
20 m
Fig. 8
EPMA analysis of coating layer (a) secondary electron image (b) distribution of Ni (c) distribution of Al and (d) distribution of Cr.
Ni2Al3
987
Conclusions
1) R. F. Decker and C. T. Sims: The Superalloys, (John Wieley & Son Inc.,
1972).
2) J. E. Schilbe: Surf. Coat. Technol. 133134 (2000) 35.
3) G. W. Goward: Surf. Coat. Technol. 108109 (1998) 73.
4) M. J. Li, X. F. Sun, H. R. Guan, X. X. Jiang and Z. Q. Hu: Surf. Coat.
Technol. 167 (2003) 106111.
5) R. E. Malush, P. Deb and D. H. Boone: Surf. Coat. Technol. 36 (1988)
1326.
6) S. Y. Lee, J. S. Lee, K. B. Kim, G. S. Kim, B. Y. Lee, H. S. Moon, H. B.
Eun, J. H. Lee and S. Y. Lee: Intermetallics 11 (2003) 743.
7) K. Murakami, N. Nishida, K. Osamura and Y. Tomota: Acta Meter. 52
(2004) 1271.
8) S. W. Ip, R. Sridhar, J. M. Toguri, T. F. Stephenson and A. E. M.
Warner: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 244 (1998) 31.
9) B. Grushko, W. Kowalski, D. Pavlyuchkov, B. Przepiorzynski and M.
Surowiec: J. Alloy. Compd. 460 (2008) 299304.