Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Yanal Alkuddsi
Ph.D Student
Dept. of Genetics and Plant Breeding
University of Agricultural Sciences
Dharwad, Karnataka, India, 580005
®
Introduction
®
Why make transgenic crops?
®
Methods of producing transgenic plant ®
Bt cotton
=
Bacillus thuringiensis transgenic cotton
®
®
®
®
®
Classification of insecticidal BT proteins.
GeneType Insect Host Size (kD)
®
The Transformation
.The gene of interest is spliced out
of the bacterium using a vector, Coker 312
like Agrobacterium
tumefasciens, & transferred to
cotton cells grown in tissue
culture.
Recurrent
back-crossing ®
Genotype requirement – Bt cotton in India
Glabrous ness
Light green leaf
Plant pigmentation long pedicel
Cream petal
Smaller bract
High gossypol on gland
High tannin
®
Development of Bt cotton ( World)
1901 - Ishawata- Japan- first reported this is an insect pathogen
1915- Berliner – Thuringia – bacterial spores caused the death of insect
1938 – first commercial product sporeine – france
1950 – toxicity was due to crystal protein
1956 - stein hous “ living insecticide”
1962 – kurstaki isolated highly potent strain in France
1989 – Hofte and whiteley transgenic proposed systemic nomenclature
1990 – Perlak et al., concept of codon modification – modified Bt gene
1996 – first field release of Bt cotton
2002 – released in India for commercial cultivation
®
Development of Bt cotton ( India)
1994 – formation of IBSC and application for seed import
1995 – permit – seed (100gr. Coker 312)
1996- imported seed, greenhouse trails
1996- limited field trails – 1 location
1997 – 98 limited field trails – 5 locations
1998 – ruminant ( goat) and allergicity studies
1998 – 99 – Multicentric replicated trails – 15 + 25 locations
1999 – 2000 – Multicentric replicated trails – 11 locations
2000 – 01 large scale field trails and hybrid seed production
2002 – approval for commercialization by GEAC
( Khadi et al., 2002)
®
®
®
®
®
Safety - Resistance
.Given time & exposure, insects
have the capacity to overcome
most insecticides. Bt cotton may
be no different, however, there are
safeguards:
.Refugia
.High-Dose Strategy
.Development of additional protein
®
Refugia
•Objective: provide harborage for susceptible
moth production to reduce the chance of resistant
(R) moths mating with each other
RR RR RR SS
RS SS
RR
•U.S. growers are required to plant a proportion of
their acreage to non-Bt cotton
5% Refuge, if no lepidopteran-active
insecticides are used on it, or else
20% Refuge
®
Concerns Insect resistance
®
®
High-Dose Strategy, Depends on:
• The production of a dose high enough to kill:
>99.9% of a susceptible (SS) population,
and Yes
>95% of the heterozygous (RS) individuals,
Yes
®
Population dynamics of non-target pests and
natural enemies in Bt cotton field
•Number of predators
increased due to reduced
pesticide uses in Bt cotton
field.
®
Impact of Bt Cotton Pollen
On Silkworms
®
Economically Damaged Square Damaged Square: Bt Cotton
Monsanto,USA
Bollgard I – event 531 – cry 1 Ac
Bollgard II- event 15985 cry 1 Ac + cry 2 Ab
Cotton Boll Damage Cotton Boll Protected
Benefits
n Insect resistance
management
n Increased control of
target pests
n Reduced insecticide
application
Control Bollgard
®
CONCLUSION
Is Bt a "public good"?
YES, by anyone's definition of a public good. Bt is
a public good because it is a natural resource, a part
of the biotic community, that has evolved over the
millennium shaped by the forces of nature. It is a
biological resource that serves uniquely valuable
functions within biotic communities, both in
natural systems and those managed by humans. It
is a product of organisms widely dispersed in
nature, owned by no one.
®