Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10661-010-1557-6
Received: 19 March 2010 / Accepted: 25 May 2010 / Published online: 11 June 2010
Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
634
Introduction
Industrialization and unplanned urbanization
have greatly transformed the natural environment. In recent times, the environment has become hostile, posing threat to health and welfare
due to release of pollutants from industries and
urban sewage (Ntengwe 2006). The effluents discharged from industries and urban sewage may
find their way into surface water bodies via canals
and surface run-off. These water bodies, such as
lagoons, ponds, and lakes, thus receive pollutants
and become vulnerable.
The tannery industry, which uses a variety of
chemicals in the tanning process, is recognized as
a major contributor of heavy metals to the environment and poses serious environmental threats
worldwide. The effluents discharged from tannery
industry contain a bulk amount of liquid and solid
wastes with substantial quantities of toxic chemicals (sodium sulfate, sodium hydroxide, sodium
hydrosulfate, arsenic sulfide, calcium hydrosulfate, dimethyle amine, sodium sulphydrate, and
chromium sulfate; Banglapedia 2006) and other
heavy toxic trace metals, organic matter, lime, and
sulfide (Tariq et al. 2006 and references therein).
In addition, several footwear, animal glue, and
paint industries, which are commonly clustered
with tannery industries, also release some amount
of toxic chemicals from their operations. According to Landgrave (1995), about 40,000 tons of
basic chemicals and 15,000 tons of chromium salt
(as chromium sulfate) are used every year in
the world. The general practice in most developing countries is that the untreated effluents discharged from the tanning units is stored in large
lagoons or released into open canal (Scholz and
Lucas 2003; More et al. 2001).
Tannery industries contribute immensely to
the socioeconomic development of Bangladesh.
635
Study area
The cluster of tannery industries in Bangladesh
is located in the Hazaribagh area of southwestern Dhaka (Fig. 1). This area lies within longitude 90 22 90 22 48 E and latitude 23 43 34
23 43 49 N. It is a component of Buriganga River
floodplain which is bordered at the northeast by
Pleistocene terrace (Madhupur Tract) and slopes
towards the southeast. The tannery campus is surrounded by residences, except the southwestern
part. More than 0.2 million people live adjacent to
Fig. 1 Sampling layout in the study area (modified after Banglapedia 2006)
pH
6.10
0.05
7.25
0.04
6.92
0.05
6.95
0.04
7.19
0.05
6.19
0.01
6.00
0.02
6.19
0.03
6.20
0.04
7.10
0.05
6.30
0.01
7.00
0.07
7.30
0.02
6.50
0.02
6.70
0.10
7.50
0.10
7.20
0.12
6.30
0.13
Site
DE1
SD
DE2
SD
DE3
SD
DE4
SD
DE5
SD
DE6
SD
DE7
SD
DE8
SD
DE9
SD
DE10
SD
DE11
SD
DE12
SD
DE13
SD
DE14
SD
DE15
SD
DE16
SD
DE17
SD
DE18
SD
7.17
0.04
8.44
0.04
8.25
0.05
7.98
0.05
8.12
0.04
9.10
0.07
11.10
0.01
10.20
0.03
12.10
0.05
8.50
0.01
15.10
0.02
13.50
0.03
15.10
0.04
16.90
0.01
19.10
0.06
12.80
0.01
11.50
0.08
14.20
0.09
EC
(mS cm1 )
602
4
756
4
669
4
724
4
698
4
719
8
750
9
795
10
831
11
957
6
912
10
1,011
14
1,119
11
919
16
871
18
921
11
710
10
790
12
COD
892
25
1,163
55
661
23
640
22
1,066
50
815
9
850
10
915
9
865
6
925
13
911
11
895
15
975
11
805
8
810
5
901
9
868
10
715
7
SO2
4
6.46
0.45
12.30
1.10
28.79
2.05
34.11
2.65
13.76
1.12
27.10
0.10
25.50
0.11
29.20
0.12
31.50
0.11
33.30
0.12
37.10
0.15
38.50
0.10
37.50
0.07
41.50
0.18
52.10
0.20
45.50
0.20
38.10
0.21
35.60
0.22
PO3
4
4,140
345
6,840
510
3,675
242
2,883
156
5,432
421
5,219
111
5,219
112
5,411
110
5,129
114
5,318
117
5,350
108
5,565
117
5,630
129
5,011
109
4,538
120
4,215
122
3,211
110
2,836
131
Cl1
2.67
0.21
6.23
0.44
47.33
3.47
119.00
5.00
10.54
0.95
77.10
0.12
91.10
0.13
67.10
0.10
105.00
0.15
83.10
0.16
177.10
0.10
125.10
0.80
152.00
0.12
194.00
0.20
88.00
0.21
58.00
0.20
46.00
0.23
95.00
0.24
NO1
3
2.41
0.15
2.21
0.13
2.01
0.16
2.51
0.17
2.50
0.08
52.90
0.13
40.50
1.20
56.20
1.50
60.80
1.60
65.10
1.50
49.40
3.10
45.30
2.10
55.30
1.20
46.60
2.20
72.10
3.50
38.50
1.30
42.70
1.40
35.30
1.50
K
24.32
1.98
23.18
1.45
22.22
1.20
25.22
1.10
24.22
1.40
35.30
0.14
48.30
0.15
55.10
0.10
45.20
0.17
56.10
0.18
72.30
0.11
64.50
0.20
73.20
0.10
81.20
0.22
95.40
0.20
65.00
0.24
49.60
0.25
25.10
0.26
Ca
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.25
0.03
3.49
0.01
5.41
0.02
12.89
0.03
9.90
0.01
8.40
0.05
13.10
0.02
20.20
0.01
14.19
0.08
5.30
0.09
5.10
0.10
3.10
0.11
0.99
0.01
1.40
0.01
Cr
0.10
0.01
0.08
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.30
0.02
0.24
0.01
0.19
0.01
0.10
0.02
0.15
0.01
0.59
0.01
1.10
0.05
0.69
0.02
0.74
0.03
1.22
0.01
1.20
0.05
0.95
0.01
0.39
0.01
0.49
0.02
0.90
0.03
Mn
Table 1 Physicochemical parameters and metal concentration (in mg/l) in lagoon and canal water
0.23
0.01
0.21
0.01
0.22
0.01
0.32
0.01
0.44
0.02
0.39
0.07
5.90
0.02
6.30
0.02
11.10
0.10
15.50
0.11
12.20
0.12
9.30
0.13
8.10
0.14
5.50
0.15
7.10
0.10
0.92
0.07
1.62
0.01
2.10
0.10
Fe
0.12
0.02
0.51
0.02
0.40
0.01
0.23
0.01
0.32
0.01
0.21
0.01
0.43
0.01
0.50
0.02
0.39
0.02
0.52
0.01
0.72
0.05
0.30
0.01
1.10
0.02
0.91
0.03
0.45
0.01
0.20
0.02
0.38
0.01
<0.005
Co
0.02
0.00
0.20
0.01
0.90
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.14
0.02
0.19
0.01
0.11
0.01
0.21
0.01
0.49
0.02
0.50
0.05
0.33
0.01
0.25
0.01
1.10
0.02
0.90
0.01
0.43
0.02
0.15
0.01
0.17
0.01
0.23
0.01
Ni
0.11
0.01
0.75
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.20
0.01
0.12
0.01
0.32
0.03
0.40
0.01
0.20
0.01
1.20
0.06
0.52
0.02
0.78
0.05
0.92
0.03
1.50
0.10
0.62
0.01
0.42
0.02
0.12
0.01
<0.005
Cu
0.04
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.08
0.01
0.26
0.07
0.14
0.02
0.11
0.01
0.31
0.02
0.50
0.03
0.75
0.02
1.11
0.05
1.75
0.06
2.50
0.07
2.15
0.05
1.51
0.01
0.90
0.01
0.11
0.11
0.44
0.02
0.60
0.03
Zn
0.70
0.01
0.65
0.06
0.69
0.05
0.26
0.01
0.42
0.01
0.69
0.02
0.55
0.03
0.73
0.01
0.78
0.05
0.85
0.02
1.10
0.07
0.90
0.08
0.65
0.01
0.78
0.01
0.92
0.01
0.44
0.02
0.10
0.01
0.22
0.01
As
<0.01
0.12
0.01
0.26
0.03
0.30
0.02
0.21
0.02
0.25
0.03
0.33
0.01
0.40
0.02
0.21
0.06
1.21
0.01
2.10
0.08
2.50
0.09
2.10
0.10
1.90
0.11
0.50
0.01
0.20
0.01
0.75
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.09
0.01
0.08
0.00
0.10
0.01
0.12
0.01
0.14
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.19
0.01
0.20
0.01
0.21
0.02
0.25
0.01
0.28
0.01
0.18
0.01
0.20
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Cd
<0.02
<0.02
Pb
636
Environ Monit Assess (2011) 175:633649
637
Methodology
Sample collection
DE19
SD
DE20
SD
Mean
Range
6.00
8.60
0.14
0.20
6.60
9.50
0.15
0.01
6.67 11.36
6.00 7.17
7.50 19.10
Bangladesh 9.00 12.00
standard
699
11
935
15
819
602
1,119
200
775
22.40
12
0.20
850
31.50
13
0.40
865
31.10
640
6.46
1,163 52.10
400
8.00
3,764
124
3,111
125
4,624
2,836
6,840
600
61.00
49.40
0.25
2.60
28.00
38.10
0.60
1.70
81.67
37.99
6.23
2.01
194.00 72.10
10.00
33.30
0.70
31.30
0.80
47.5
22.22
95.40
0.79
0.04
0.88
0.05
5.27
0.02
20.20
0.50
0.81
0.14
0.10
0.01
0.52
0.06
1.22
5.00
0.11
0.01
0.33
0.05
0.41
0.11
1.10
0.51
0.01
1.30
0.01
4.68
0.21
15.50
2.00
0.22
0.01
0.10
0.01
0.33
0.02
1.10
1.00
0.11
0.01
0.55
0.05
0.44
0.03
1.50
0.50
0.24
0.01
0.53
0.01
0.70
0.02
2.50
5.00
0.35
0.01
0.12
0.01
0.59
0.10
1.10
0.20
1.91
0.15
0.82
0.06
0.81
0.12
2.50
0.10
0.16
0.01
0.10
0.01
0.13
0.02
0.28
0.05
Twenty water samples (prefixed DE) were collected from key locations within the Rayer Bazar
lagoon and Hazaribag-Mohammadpur canal into
plastic bottles, which had been pre-conditioned
with 5% nitric acid and rinsed with distilled deionized water. Prior to sampling, the pre-cleaned
sample bottles were immersed about 10 cm below
the water surface. The samples were collected at a
100 m interval from the outlet of the tannery zone
to the mouth of the Buriganga River. Sampling
was done at mid dry season (March) when the
canal and lagoon were at low water levels. During
monsoon sampling in the canal and surrounding
floodplains were not possible as these areas were
submerged by flood.
Methods for physicochemical analysis
The pH of samples was determined in situ
using a microprocessor pH meter (HANNA Instruments, model: PH 211). Electrical conductivity (EC) was measured with a conductivity
meter (HANNA Instruments, model: HI 8033).
The collected water samples were filtered using a pre-conditioned plastic Millipore filter
unit equipped with a 0.45 m filter membrane
(Gelman Inst. Co, London) and preserved in
a refrigerator at 4 C for subsequent elemental analysis. Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
was measured by the dichromate reflux method
(Michael 1975; Clesceri et al. 1998). Anions
638
3
(SO2
4 , PO4 , Cl , and NO3 ) were analyzed by
colorimetric methods, following the procedure
of APHA (1995).
Elemental analysis
Elemental analysis of water samples was performed by a Perkin-Elmer Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometer (AAS; Model 3110). The accuracy and precision of the AAS analytical
method were validated by triplicate analyses of
SRM-1640 (groundwater), a NIST standard reference material. The precision was better than 8%
for all analyzed elements. The minimum detection
limits (in mg/l) of heavy metals in the analyzed
water samples were: 0.05 (K), 0.03 (Ca), 0.048
(Mn), 0.038 (Fe), 0.005 (Cu, Co), 0.02 (Zn), 0.01
(As, Cr, Ni, Cd), and 0.02 (Pb).
Statistical analysis
The measured parameters were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal
component analysis/factor analysis using SPSS
16.0 statistical package. Prior to such analyses,
the raw data were normalized to avoid misclassifications due to the different order of magnitude
and range of variation of the analytical parameters
(Aruga et al. 1995).
Principal component analysis transforms the
original variables of a data set into new, uncorrelated variables or axes, known as the principal components, which are linear combinations
of the original variables (Shrestha and Kazama
2007). Exploratory factor analysis is used for reducing the complex set of variables to smaller
number of factors (Howitt and Cramer 2005). The
physicochemical and metal data were subjected to
principal component analysis for exploration of
the extent of metal pollution and source identification. Varimax rotation was used to maximize the sum of the variance of the factor
coefficients which better explained the possible
groups/sources that influenced the water systems
(Gotelli and Ellison 2004).
The correlation coefficient matrix measures
how well the variance of each constituent can be
explained by its relationship with others (Liu et al.
SO2
4 , 6401,163; PO4 , 6.4652.1; Cl , 3,111
639
640
Table 2 Varimax rotated
factor loadings and
communalities of water
quality parameters
(significant values are in
bold type face)
PC1
PC2
PC3
PC4
Communalities
pH
EC
COD
SO4
PO4
Cl
NO3
K
Ca
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Pb
Cd
Eigenvalue
% of variance
Cumulative %
0.132
0.707
0.697
0.114
0.603
0.093
0.623
0.901
0.792
0.901
0.759
0.832
0.367
0.288
0.460
0.839
0.021
0.739
0.931
7.843
41.270
41.280
0.252
0.435
0.362
0.439
0.724
0.034
0.669
0.168
0.295
0.190
0.224
0.226
0.839
0.699
0.756
0.348
0.200
0.480
0.230
4.011
21.120
62.390
0.062
0.114
0.213
0.623
0.242
0.951
0.079
0.054
0.324
0.278
0.041
0.322
0.011
0.404
0.142
0.011
0.872
0.161
0.155
2.705
14.240
76.630
0.911
0.048
0.397
0.580
0.068
0.168
0.235
0.144
0.092
0.067
0.076
0.051
0.125
0.113
0.194
0.041
0.244
0.058
0.006
1.586
8.350
84.980
0.915
0.704
0.82
0.93
0.95
0.943
0.897
0.864
0.828
0.93
0.634
0.85
0.854
0.748
0.841
0.826
0.86
0.806
0.944
loaded on SO2
4 , Cl , and As. These parame-
R-mode
Parameter
PC1
PC2
PC3
Communalities
K
Ca
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Pb
Cd
Eigen value
% of variance
Cumulative %
0.880
0.776
0.882
0.777
0.821
0.326
0.231
0.380
0.836
0.053
0.723
0.914
5.797
48.31
48.31
0.255
0.317
0.274
0.206
0.259
0.858
0.797
0.866
0.349
0.095
0.509
0.292
2.946
24.552
72.862
0.018
0.355
0.222
0.025
0.346
0.053
0.367
0.086
0.055
0.957
0.173
0.179
1.421
11.84
84.702
0.84
0.828
0.902
0.647
0.861
0.844
0.823
0.902
0.825
0.927
0.811
0.954
641
Sampling site
PC1
PC2
PC3
PC4
DE1
DE2
DE3
DE4
DE5
DE6
DE7
DE8
DE9
DE10
DE11
DE12
DE13
DE14
DE15
DE16
DE17
DE18
DE19
DE20
1.093
1.907
2.623
1.001
0.875
0.367
0.253
0.344
0.492
0.665
0.852
0.937
1.082
0.667
0.772
0.310
0.502
0.461
0.258
0.272
2.938
0.481
2.403
0.390
0.793
0.089
0.530
0.197
0.211
0.117
0.403
0.300
0.362
1.111
0.923
0.201
0.479
0.074
0.552
0.380
0.333
1.455
0.048
2.010
0.335
0.378
0.491
0.827
0.719
0.703
0.936
0.558
0.652
0.458
0.288
0.459
1.675
1.615
0.777
1.551
0.976
1.690
0.559
0.298
1.264
1.098
1.274
0.758
0.845
0.624
0.564
0.486
1.321
0.380
0.128
1.496
1.209
0.704
1.228
0.722
Table 5 Factor scores for the R-mode factor analysis (significant values are in bold type face)
Sampling site
PC1
PC2
PC3
DE1
DE2
DE3
DE4
DE5
DE6
DE7
DE8
DE9
DE10
DE11
DE12
DE13
DE14
DE15
DE16
DE17
DE18
DE19
DE20
0.838
2.212
2.602
0.681
0.928
0.289
0.309
0.350
0.498
0.831
0.805
0.988
0.938
0.625
0.773
0.221
0.439
0.434
0.380
0.040
3.393
0.081
1.964
0.679
0.201
0.009
0.692
0.048
0.248
0.227
0.367
0.199
0.562
1.057
0.769
0.209
0.092
0.054
0.402
0.343
0.989
0.751
0.482
1.399
0.366
0.124
0.361
0.666
0.731
1.040
1.018
0.553
0.527
0.513
0.659
0.408
1.812
1.414
0.949
2.064
642
K, Ca, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, and Cd; Co, Cu, and
Ni; and As, respectively, and elemental patterns
were similar to that obtained for all parameters
metal data set (the physicochemical parameters
and metals).
The relationships among the analyzed parameters are also visualized in the factor loadings plots
of PC1 vs. PC2 and PC1 vs. PC3 (Fig. 2). For all
parameters, four main clusters are obtained from
the plotting of PC1 vs. PC2 (Fig. 2a). Cluster 1
contains parameters EC, COD, Ca, K, Fe, Mn,
Zn, Pb, Cd, and Cr and cluster 2 consists of PO3
4 ,
PO3
4 , NO3 , Pb, Cu, Co, and Ni and cluster 3
consists of Cl , As, SO2
4 , and pH. However, pH
is slightly different from the other cluster members, as depicted by its long linkage distance; this
observation is strongly supported by PC3 in PCA
analysis. The metalmetal CA presented in Fig. 3b
shows similar clustering, where cluster 1 contains
Cu, Co, and Ni; cluster 2 is made up of K, Cd, Cr,
Fe, Zn, Ca, Mn, and Pb; and cluster 3 contains As
only.
Fig. 2 Plots of first three principal component loadings, PC1 vs. PC2 and PC1 vs. PC3 for all analyzed parameters (a, b) and
metals only (c, d)
643
Fig. 3 Dendrogram showing the hierarchical clusters of analyzed parameters and samples using all parameters (a, c) and
metals only (b, d). Dashed lines in dendrograms represent Phenon lines
644
645
646
Fig. 7 Plots of PC1 vs. PC2 and PC1 vs. PC3 showing groupings among sampling sites
pH
EC (mS cm1 )
COD
SO2
4
PO3
4
Cl
NO
3
K
Ca
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Pb
Cd
647
Group 1
(n = 5) average SD
Group 2
(n = 8) average SD
Group 3
(n = 7) average SD
6.88
7.99
689.8
884.4
19.08
4,594
37.15
2.33
23.83
0.07
0.16
0.30
0.25
0.26
0.23
0.11
0.54
0.23
0.03
6.50
10.88
789.9
836.1
31.86
4,123
65.41
44.20
42.88
3.62
0.39
2.38
0.30
0.17
0.31
0.36
0.40
0.62
0.15
6.73
14.33
945.7
883.7
38.79
5,220
132.04
56.37
69.70
10.88
0.93
9.83
0.63
0.57
0.79
1.52
0.85
1.49
0.18
0.46
0.49
58.7
234.7
11.77
1,559
49.13
0.21
1.16
0.10
0.11
0.10
0.14
0.37
0.35
0.10
0.20
0.09
0.01
0.56
1.92
92.2
66.2
7.55
1,050
22.44
7.67
13.69
4.08
0.32
2.37
0.12
0.05
0.20
0.19
0.25
0.57
0.07
0.42
3.42
95.8
61.8
6.74
372
43.55
10.09
16.45
5.39
0.26
3.39
0.29
0.31
0.46
0.65
0.14
0.90
0.05
Table 7 Pearsons correlation matrix among metals in lagoon and canal water samples
K
Ca
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Pb
Cd
Ca
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Pb
Cd
1
0.727a
0.584a
0.610a
0.656a
0.417
0.265
0.461b
0.503b
0.338
0.488b
0.728a
1
0.622a
0.648a
0.606a
0.696a
0.430
0.787a
0.678a
0.541b
0.656a
0.765a
1
0.430
0.773a
0.394
0.322
0.365
0.843a
0.630a
0.503b
0.391
1
0.554b
0.508b
0.573b
0.435
0.707a
0.274
0.746a
0.719a
1
0.436
0.524b
0.440
0.702a
0.699a
0.288
0.318
1
0.480b
0.721a
0.536b
0.465b
0.527b
0.521b
1
0.531b
0.504b
0.395
0.501b
0.255
1
0.520b
0.487b
0.575a
0.557b
1
0.500b
0.755a
0.513b
1
0.259
0.080
1
0.642a
a Correlation
b Correlation
648
the water systems may have originated from combined sources of tannery industry and municipal
sewage. The strong association of Co, Ni, and Cu
indicates common sources, and these metals may
have been derived from anthropogenic sources,
especially paint industry and municipal sewage
system.
Conclusions
This study has employed principal component and
cluster analyses to investigate the sources of heavy
metal pollution of the lagoon and canal water
systems at the Hazaribagh area of southwestern Dhaka, Bangladesh. The mean concentration
of the analyzed physicochemical parameters and
metals are quite high and greatly exceed the permissible limits of Bangladesh industrial effluent
standards. Among the measured parameters, the
concentrations of Cr, As, Pb, and Cd are more
significant and somewhat alarming in evidencing
the pollution potential.
In the multivariate statistical analyses, three
groups are extracted from the sampling sites by
the Q-mode CA and PCA methods. Group 1
includes sites DE1DE5, which are located at the
proximal part of the canal and close to the tannery
complex. Group 2 includes sampling sites located
close to the lagoon (DE6DE8), and the discharging point of the canal to Buriganga River (DE16
DE20) whereas DE9 to DE15 fall in group 3.
The group 3 sites appear to be the most polluted,
followed by group 2 with group 1 being the least
polluted with respect to the analyzed parameters.
The R-mode PCA and CA, supported by Pearsons correlation matrix, suggest that the effluents
discharged from the tannery and auxiliary (e.g.,
paint) industries, and municipal sewage are the
main sources of heavy metal pollution in the lagoon and canal water systems in the Hazaribagh
area of southwestern Dhaka. GIS-based factor
score maps are developed to show the spatial variations of the contributing processes affecting surface water hydrochemistry in the study area. The
activities of paint and tannery industries and urban sewage are competitive processes influencing
surface water hydrochemistry in the area, while
References
American Public Health Association (1995). Standard
methods for the examination of water and wastewater
(19th ed.). Washington: APHA.
Aruga, R., Gastaldi, D., Negro, G., & Ostacoli, G. (1995).
Pollution of a river basin and its evolution with time
studied by multivariate statistical analysis. Analytica
Chimica Acta, 310, 1525.
Asaduzzaman, A. T. M., Nury, S. N., Hoque, S., & Sultana,
S. (2002). Water and soil contamination from tannery
waste: Potential impact on public health in Hazaribag
and surroundings, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Atlas of Urban
Geology, 14, 415443.
Astel, A., Tsakovski, S., Barbieri, P., & Simeonov, V.
(2007). Comparison of self-organizing maps classification approach with cluster and principal components analysis for large environmental data sets. Water
Research, 41, 45664578.
Astel, A., Tsakovski, S., Simeonov, V., Reisenhofer, E.,
Piselli, S., & Barbieri, P. (2008). Multivariate classification and modeling in surface water pollution estimation. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 390,
12831292.
Banglapedia (2006). National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh.
Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. http://www.
banglapedia.org/httpdocs/english/.
649
Landgrave, J. (1995). A pilot plant for removing chromium
from residual water of tanneries. Environmental
Health Perspective, 1, 6365.
Liu, C. W., Lin, K. H., & Kuo, Y. M. (2003). Application
of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater
quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Science
of the Total Environment, 313, 7789.
Marengo, E., Gennaro, M. C., Giacosa, D., Abrigo, C., Saini,
G., & Avignone, M. T. (1995). How chemometrics
can helpfully assist in evaluating environmental data
Lagoon water. Analytica Chimica Acta, 317,5363.
Michael, J. T. (1975). Water analysis. In F. J. Welcher
(Ed.), Standard methods of chemical analysis (Part B)
(6th ed.). Huntington: Robert E. Krieger.
More, S. V., John, S. B., Rao, S., Nair, B. U., &
Laxman, R. S. (2001). Chromium removal and reduction in COD of tannery effluents by actinomycetes.
Indian Journal of Environmental Health, 43, 108113.
Ntengwe, F. W. (2006). Pollutant loads and water quality in
stream of heavily populated and industrialized towns.
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 31, 832839.
Rashid, H. E. (1991). Geography of Bangladesh (2nd revised ed.). Dhaka: University Press Limited.
Scholz, W., & Lucas, M. (2003). Techno-economic evaluation of membrane filtration for the recovery and reuse
of tannery chemicals. Water Research, 37, 18591867.
Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2007). Assessment of surface
water quality using multivariate statistical techniques:
A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environmental Modeling and Software, 22, 464475.
Simeonova, P., & Simeonov, V. (2007). Chemometrics to
evaluate the quality of water sources for human consumption. Microchimica Acta, 156, 315320.
Stefanov, S., Simeonov, V., & Tsakovski, S. (1999). Chemometrical analysis of waste water monitoring data from
Yantra river basin, Bulgaria. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 70, 473482.
Tariq, R. S., Shah, M. H., Shaheen, N., Khalique, A.,
Manzoor, S., & Jaffar, M. (2005). Multivariate analysis
of selected metals in tannery effluents and related soil.
Journal of Hazardous Materials, A122, 1722.
Tariq, S. R., Shah, M. H., Shaheen, N., Khalique, A.,
Manzoor, S., & Jaffar, M. (2006). Multivariate analysis of trace metal levels in tannery effluents in relation to soil and water: A case study from Peshawar,
Pakistan. Journal of Environmental Management, 79,
2029.
Tariq, S. R., Shaheen, N., Khalique, A., & Sha, M. H.
(in press). Distribution, correlation, and source apportionment of selected metals in tannery effluents,
related soils, and groundwaterA case studies from
Multan, Pakistan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1003-9.
Yidana, S. M., Banoeng-Yakubo, B., & Akabzaa, T. M.
(in press). Analysis of groundwater quality using multivariate and spatial analyses in the Keta
basin, Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences.
doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.03.003.
Yidana, S. M., & Yidana, A. (2010). Assessing water quality using water quality index and multivariate analysis.
Environmental Earth Sciences, 59, 14611473.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.