Public Opinion On The Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Public Opinion on
Quality of Governance in Pakistan

At the end of the
Second Year of Federal and Provincial Governments
June 2014 May 2015
October 2015
Poverty Law and Water Resource
Alleviation Order Development and
Management Management
Education
of Inflation
Merit-based
Healthcare
appointments
in Regulatory Bodies
Transparency
Performance of
Regulatory Bodies
Energy Production
Foreign Policy
and Management
Management
Anti-Corruption
National
Security
Investment
Friendliness
GOVERNANCE
INDICATORS
Tax Collection
Utility Bills
Collection
Access to an
Efficient
Justice System
Devolution of
Power to the
Lower Tiers
Immunization of
Children
Management of
Unemployment
Development
Programme
Disaster Preparedness
& Management
Environmental
Sustainability
Quality and
Independence of
Management of
Civil Service
Supply of
Merit-based
Agricultural
Recruitment and Use of
Clean, Efficient and
Inputs
Promotions Technologies Economic Efficient
for Better Public Procurement
Governance
Public Opinion on
At the end of the
Second Year of Federal and Provincial Governments
June 2014 May 2015
October 2015
Poverty Law and Water Resource
Alleviation Order Development and
Management Management
Education
of Inflation
Merit-based
Healthcare
appointments
Transparency
Performance of
Regulatory Bodies
Energy Production
Foreign Policy
and Management
Management
Anti-Corruption
National
Security
Investment
Friendliness
GOVERNANCE
INDICATORS
Tax Collection
Utility Bills
Collection
Access to an
Efficient
Justice System
Devolution of
Power to the
Lower Tiers
Immunization of
Children
Management of
Unemployment
Development
Programme
& Management
Environmental
Sustainability
Quality and
Independence of
Management of
Civil Service
Supply of
Merit-based
Agricultural
Recruitment and Use of
Inputs
Promotions Technologies Economic Efficient
for Better Public Procurement
Governance
PILDAT is an independent, non-partisan and not-for-profit indigenous research and training institution with the
mission to strengthen democracy and democratic institutions in Pakistan.
PILDAT is a registered non-profit entity under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860, Pakistan.
Copyright Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development And Transparency - PILDAT
All Rights Reserved
Printed in Pakistan
Published: October 2015
ISBN: 978-969-558-556-2
Any part of this publication can be used or cited with a clear reference to PILDAT.
Islamabad Office: P. O. Box 278, F-8, Postal Code: 44220, Islamabad, Pakistan
Lahore Office: P. O. Box 11098, L.C.C.H.S, Postal Code: 54792, Lahore, Pakistan
E-mail: info@pildat.org | Website: www.pildat.org
P I L D AT
Report
Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Second Year of Federal and Provincial Governments: June 2014 May 2015
October 2015
CONTENTS
Preface
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Executive Summary
Quality of Governance Federal GovernmentViews of Respondents from All Over 41
Pakistan
Quality of Governance Balochistan GovernmentViews of Respondents from All Over 139
Balochistan
Quality of Governance Khyber Pakhtunkhwa GovernmentViews of Respondents from 201
All Over Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Quality of Governance Punjab Government Views of Respondents from All Over 263
Punjab
Quality of Governance Sindh Government Views of Respondents from All Over Sindh
325
Detailed Indicators on Quality of Governance in Pakistan
387
Figures and Tables

Figure 1: Governance Track Record - Negative Evaluation Indicators
Figure 2: Governance Track Record - Positive Evaluation Indicators
Figure 3: Performance of Chief Ministers (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 4: Performance of Provincial Governments (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 5: Trust in Institutions (All Over Pakistan)
21
22
29
30
31
Figure 6: Performance of Federal Ministries

Figure 7: Performance of Provincial Departments
33
36
Figure 8: Law and Order (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 9: Poverty Alleviation (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 10: Education (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 11: Healthcare (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 12: Transparency (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 13: Energy Production and Management (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 14: Anti-Corruption (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 15: Investment Friendliness (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 16: Tax Collection (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 17: Utility Bills Collection (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 18: Management of Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 19: Development Programmes (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 20: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 21: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 22: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 23: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 24: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 25: Environmental Sustainability (All Over Pakistan)
47
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 26: Disaster Preparedness and Management (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 27: Immunization of Children (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 28: Devolution of Powers to the lower tiers- Establishment of Local Governments (All
Over Pakistan)
Figure 29: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Distribution of Resources to Provincial
and Local Governments (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 30: Devolution of Powers to the lower tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (All Over
Pakistan)
Figure 31: Access to Efficient Justice System (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 32: National Security (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 33: Foreign Policy Management (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 34: Performance of Regulatory Bodies- Independence and Efficiency (All Over
Pakistan)
Figure 35: Performance of Regulatory Bodies- Merit-Based Appointments (All Over
Pakistan)
Figure 36: Management of Inflation (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 37: Water Resources Development and Management (All Over Pakistan)
101
104
107
Figure 38: Law and Order (Balochistan)

Figure 39: Poverty Alleviation (Balochistan)
Figure 40: Education (Balochistan)
Figure 41: Healthcare (Balochistan)
Figure 42: Transparency (Balochistan)
Figure 43: Energy Production and Management (Balochistan)
Figure 44: Anti- Corruption (Balochistan)
Figure 45: Investment Friendliness (Balochistan)
Figure 46: Tax Collection (Balochistan)
Figure 47: Utility Bills Collection (Balochistan)
Figure 48: Management of Unemployment (Balochistan)
Figure 49: Development Programmes (Balochistan)
Figure 50: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Balochistan)
Figure 51: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Balochistan)
Figure 52: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Balochistan)
Figure 53: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Balochistan)
Figure 54: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Balochistan)
Figure 55: Environmental Sustainability (Balochistan)
Figure 56: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Balochistan)
Figure 57: Immunization of Children (Balochistan)
Figure 58: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Establishment of Local Governments
(Balochistan)
and Local Governments (Balochistan)
Figure 60: Devolution of Powers to the lower tiers- Effective Devolution of Power
(Balochistan)
Figure 61: Access to Efficient Justice System (Balochistan)
Figure 62: Public Transport (Balochistan)
Figure 63: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Balochistan)
Figure 64: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Balochistan)
Figure 65: Water Resources Development and Management (Balochistan)
143
145
147
149
151
153
155
157
159
161
163
165
167
169
171
173
175
177
179
181
183
Figure 66: Law and Order (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Figure 67: Poverty Alleviation (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 68: Education (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 69: Healthcare (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 70: Transparency (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 71: Energy Production and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
205
207
209
211
213
215
110
113
116
119
122
125
128
131
134
185
187
189
191
193
195
197
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 72: Anti-Corruption (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Figure 73: Investment Friendliness (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 74: Tax Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 75: Utility Bills Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 76: Management of Unemployment (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 77: Development Programmes (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 78: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 79: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 80: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 81: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 82: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 83: Environmental Sustainability (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 84: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 85: Immunization of Children (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
(Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
and Local Governments (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 88: Devolution of Powers to the lower tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 89: Access to Efficient Justice System (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 90: Public Transport (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 91: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Figure 92: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Figure 93: Water Resources Development and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
217
219
221
223
225
227
229
231
233
235
237
239
241
243
245
Figure 94: Law and Order (Punjab)

Figure 95: Poverty Alleviation (Punjab)
Figure 96: Education (Punjab)
Figure 97: Healthcare (Punjab)
Figure 98: Transparency (Punjab)
Figure 99: Energy Production and Management (Punjab)
Figure 100: Anti-Corruption (Punjab)
Figure 101: Investment Friendliness (Punjab)
Figure 102: Tax Collection (Punjab)
Figure 103: Utility Bills Collection (Punjab)
Figure 104: Management of Unemployment (Punjab)
Figure 105: Development Programmes (Punjab)
Figure 106: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Punjab)
Figure 107: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Punjab)
Figure 108: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Punjab)
Figure 109: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Punjab)
Figure 110: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Punjab)
Figure 111: Environmental Sustainability (Punjab)
Figure 112: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Punjab)
Figure 113: Immunization of Children (Punjab)
(Punjab)
and Local Governments (Punjab)
Figure 116: Devolution of Powers to the lower tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (Punjab)
Figure 117: Access to Efficient Justice System (Punjab)
Figure 118: Public Transport (Punjab)
Figure 119: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Punjab)
Figure 120: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Punjab)
267
269
271
273
275
277
279
281
283
285
287
289
291
293
295
297
299
301
303
305
307
247
249
251
253
255
257
259
309
311
313
315
317
319
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 121: Water Resources Development and Management (Punjab)
321
Figure 122: Law and Order (Sindh)

Figure 123: Poverty Alleviation (Sindh)
Figure 124: Education (Sindh)
Figure 125: Healthcare (Sindh)
Figure 126: Transparency (Sindh)
Figure 127: Energy Production and Management (Sindh)
Figure 128: Anti-Corruption (Sindh)
Figure 129: Investment Friendliness (Sindh)
Figure 130: Tax Collection (Sindh)
Figure 131: Utility Bills Collection (Sindh)
Figure 132: Management of Unemployment (Sindh)
Figure 133: Development Programmes (Sindh)
Figure 134: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Sindh)
Figure 135: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Sindh)
Figure 136: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Sindh)
Figure 137: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Sindh)
Figure 138: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Sindh)
Figure 139: Environmental Sustainability (Sindh)
Figure 140: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Sindh)
Figure 141: Immunization of Children (Sindh)
(Sindh)
and Local Governments (Sindh)
Figure 144: Devolution of Powers to the lower tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (Sindh)
Figure 145: Access to Efficient Justice System (Sindh)
Figure 146: Public Transport (Sindh)
Figure 147: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Sindh)
Figure 148: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Sindh)
Figure 149: Water Resources Development and Management (Sindh)
329
331
333
335
337
339
341
343
345
347
349
351
353
355
357
359
361
363
365
367
369
Figure 150: Comparative Position with respect to Zardari (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 151: Comparative Position with respect to Musharraf (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 152: Future Possibility Improving the Economy (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 153: Future Possibility Improving the Security Situation (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 154: Future Possibility Controlling Terrorism (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 155: Future Possibility Decreasing Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 156: Future Possibility-Alleviating Poverty (All Over Pakistan)
392
395
398
401
404
407
410
Figure 157: Future Possibility Improving Relations with the USA (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 158: Future Possibility Improving Relations with India (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 159: Future Possibility Improving Relations with Afghanistan (All Over Pakistan)
413
416
419
Figure 160: Trust in Institutions- National Accountability Bureau (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 161: Trust in Institutions Government Officers (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 162: Trust in Institutions- Armed Forces (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 163: Trust in Institutions- Police (All Over Pakistan)
422
425
428
431
Figure 164: Performance of Prime Minister (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 165: Performance of Chief Minister of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 166: Performance of Chief Minister of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 167: Performance of Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 168: Performance of Chief Minister of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)
434
436
439
442
445
371
373
375
377
379
381
383
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 169: Performance of Provincial Government of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 170: Performance of Provincial Government of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 171: Performance of Provincial Government of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)
Figure 172: Performance of Provincial Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over
Pakistan)
448
451
454
457
Figure 173: Biggest Current Issue in Pakistan (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 174: Performance of Ministry of Commerce (Federal)
Figure 175: Performance of Ministry of Defence (Federal)
Figure 176: Performance of Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics and
Privatization (Federal)
Figure 177: Performance of Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Federal)
Figure 178: Performance of Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage
(Federal)
Figure 179: Performance of the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication
(Federal)
Figure 180: Performance of the Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control (Federal)
Figure 181: Performance of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources (Federal)
Figure 182: Performance of the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms (Federal)
Figure 183: Performance of the Ministry of Railways (Federal)
Figure 184: Performance of the Ministry of Water and Power (Federal)
460
463
466
469
Figure 185: Performance of the Department for Education (Provincial)

Figure 186: Performance of the Department for Health (Provincial)
Figure 187: Performance of the Department for Interior (Provincial)
Figure 188: Performance of the Department for Finance (Provincial)
Figure 189: Performance of the Department for Agriculture (Provincial)
Figure 190: Performance of the Department for Water and Irrigation (Provincial)
Figure 191: Performance of the Department for Telecommunication (Provincial)
Figure 192: Performance of the Department for Local Governments (Provincial)
Figure 193: Performance of the Department for Mines and Minerals (Provincial)
Figure 194: Performance of the Department for Forestry (Provincial)
Figure 195: Performance of the Department for Planning and Development (Provincial)
496
498
500
502
504
506
508
510
512
514
516
Table 1: Core Governance Indicators

Table 2: Federal Government Score Card (National Evaluation)
Table 3: Provincial Scores
Table 4: Governance Scores: National Scores vs. Provincial Scores
Table 5: Performance of Chief Ministers
Table 6: Performance of Provincial Governments
Table 7: Trust in Institutions
Table 8: Performance of Federal Ministries
Table 9: Performance of Provincial Departments
18
20
24
27
28
29
31
32
35
Table 10: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance-Federal Government

Table 11: Comparative Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance For All
Five Governments
Table 12: Law and Order (All Over Pakistan)
Table 13: Poverty Alleviation (All Over Pakistan)
Table 14: Education (All Over Pakistan)
Table 15: Healthcare (All Over Pakistan)
Table 16: Transparency (All Over Pakistan)
Table 17: Energy Production and Management (All Over Pakistan)
Table 18: Anti-Corruption (All Over Pakistan)
Table 19: Investment Friendliness (All Over Pakistan)
Table 20: Tax Collection (All Over Pakistan)
41
42
472
475
478
481
484
487
490
493
48
51
54
57
60
63
66
69
72
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 21: Utility Bills Collection (All Over Pakistan)

Table 22: Management of Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)
Table 23: Development Programmes (All Over Pakistan)
Table 24: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (All Over Pakistan)
Table 25: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (All Over Pakistan)
Table 26: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (All Over Pakistan)
Table 27: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (All Over Pakistan)
Table 28: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (All Over Pakistan)
Table 29: Environmental Sustainability (All Over Pakistan)
Table 30: Disaster Preparedness and Management (All Over Pakistan)
Table 31: Immunization of Children (All Over Pakistan)
Table 32: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Establishment of Local Governments
(All Over Pakistan)
Table 33: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Distribution of Resources to Provincial
Table 34: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective Devolution of Power
Table 35: Access to Efficient Justice System (All Over Pakistan)
Table 36: National Security (All Over Pakistan)
Table 37: Foreign Policy Management (All Over Pakistan)
Table 38: Performance of Regulatory Bodies- Independence and Efficiency (All Over
Pakistan)
Table 39: Performance of Regulatory Bodies- Merit-Based Appointments (All Over Pakistan)
Table 40: Management of Inflation (All Over Pakistan)
Table 41: Water Resources Development and Management (All Over Pakistan)
Table 42: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance- Balochistan
Table 43: Law and Order (Balochistan)
Table 44: Poverty Alleviation (Balochistan)
Table 45: Education (Balochistan)
Table 46: Healthcare (Balochistan)
Table 47: Transparency (Balochistan)
Table 48: Energy Production and Management (Balochistan)
Table 49: Anti-Corruption (Balochistan)
Table 50: Investment Friendliness (Balochistan)
Table 51: Tax Collection (Balochistan)
Table 52: Utility Bills Collection (Balochistan)
Table 53: Management of Unemployment (Balochistan)
Table 54: Development Programmes (Balochistan)
Table 55: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Balochistan)
Table 56: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Balochistan)
Table 57: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Balochistan)
Table 58: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Balochistan)
Table 59: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Balochistan)
Table 60: Environmental Sustainability (Balochistan)
Table 61: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Balochistan)
Table 62: Immunization of Children (Balochistan)
(Balochistan)
(Balochistan)
Table 66: Access to Efficient Justice System (Balochistan)
Table 67: Public Transport (Balochistan)
Table 68: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Balochistan)
Table 69: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Balochistan)
75
78
81
84
87
90
93
96
99
102
105
108
111
114
117
120
123
126
129
132
135
139
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
174
176
178
180
182
184
186
188
190
192
194
196
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 70: Water Resources Development and Management (Balochistan)
198
Table 71: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance- Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Table 72: Law and Order (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 73: Poverty Alleviation (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 74: Education (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 75: Healthcare (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 76: Transparency (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 77: Energy Production and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 78: Anti-Corruption (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 79: Investment Friendliness (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 80: Tax Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 81: Utility Bills Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 82: Management of Unemployment (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 83: Development Programmes (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 84: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 85: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 86: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 87: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 88: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 89: Environmental Sustainability (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 90: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 91: Immunization of Children (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 94: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 95: Access to Efficient Justice System (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 96: Public Transport (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 97: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 98: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Table 99: Water Resources Development and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
201
206
208
210
212
214
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
236
238
240
242
244
246
Table 100: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance-Punjab

Table 101: Law and Order (Punjab)
Table 102: Poverty Alleviation (Punjab)
Table 103: Education (Punjab)
Table 104: Healthcare (Punjab)
Table 105: Transparency (Punjab)
Table 106: Energy Production and Management (Punjab)
Table 107: Anti-Corruption (Punjab)
Table 108: Investment Friendliness (Punjab)
Table 109: Tax Collection (Punjab)
Table 110: Utility Bills Collection (Punjab)
Table 111: Management of Unemployment (Punjab)
Table 112: Development Programmes (Punjab)
Table 113: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Punjab)
Table 114: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Punjab)
Table 115: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Punjab)
Table 116: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Punjab)
Table 117: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Punjab)
Table 118: Environmental Sustainability (Punjab)
Table 119: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Punjab)
Table 120: Immunization of Children (Punjab)
263
268
270
272
274
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
292
294
296
298
300
302
304
306
248
250
252
254
256
258
260
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
(Punjab)
and Local Governments (Punjab)
(Punjab)
Table 124: Access to Efficient Justice System (Punjab)
Table 125: Public Transport (Punjab)
Table 126: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Punjab)
Table 127: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Punjab)
Table 128: Water Resources Development and Management (Punjab)
308
Table 129: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance- Sindh

Table 130: Law and Order (Sindh)
Table 131: Poverty Alleviation (Sindh)
Table 132: Education (Sindh)
Table 133: Healthcare (Sindh)
Table 134: Transparency (Sindh)
Table 135: Energy Production and Management (Sindh)
Table 136: Anti-Corruption (Sindh)
Table 137: Investment Friendliness (Sindh)
Table 138: Tax Collection (Sindh)
Table 139: Utility Bills Collection (Sindh)
Table 140: Management of Unemployment (Sindh)
Table 141: Development Programmes (Sindh)
Table 142: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Sindh)
Table 143: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Sindh)
Table 144: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Sindh)
Table 145: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Sindh)
Table 146: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Sindh)
Table 147: Environmental Sustainability (Sindh)
Table 148: Disaster Preparedness & Management
Table 149: Immunization of Children
(Sindh)
Table 152: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (Sindh)
Table 153: Access to Efficient Justice System (Sindh)
Table 154: Public Transport (Sindh)
Table 155: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Sindh)
Table 156: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Sindh)
Table 157: Water Resources Development and Management (Sindh)
325
330
332
334
336
338
340
342
344
346
348
350
352
354
356
358
360
362
364
366
368
370
Table 158: Comparative Position with respect to Zardari (All Over Pakistan)
Table 159: Comparative Position with respect to Musharraf (All Over Pakistan)
393
396
Table 160: Future Possibility Improving the Economy (All Over Pakistan)
Table 161: Future Possibility Improving the Security Situation (All Over Pakistan)
Table 162: Future Possibility Controlling Terrorism (All Over Pakistan)
Table 163: Future Possibility Decreasing Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)
Table 164: Future Possibility-Alleviating Poverty (All Over Pakistan)
Table 165: Future Possibility Improving Relations with the USA (All Over Pakistan)
Table 166: Future Possibility Improving Relations with India (All Over Pakistan)
Table 167: Future Possibility Improving Relations with Afghanistan (All Over Pakistan)
399
402
405
408
411
414
417
420
210
312
314
316
318
320
322
372
374
376
378
380
382
384
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 168: Trust in Institutions- National Accountability Bureau (All Over Pakistan)
Table 169: Trust in Institutions Government Officers (All Over Pakistan)
Table 170: Trust in Institutions- Army (All Over Pakistan)
Table 171: Trust in Institutions- Police (All Over Pakistan)
423
426
429
432
Table 172: Performance of Prime Minister (All Over Pakistan)

Table 173: Performance of Chief Minister of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)
Table 174: Performance of Chief Minister of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)
Table 175: Performance of Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over Pakistan)
Table 176: Performance of Chief Minister of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)
435
437
440
443
446
Table 177: Performance of Provincial Government of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)

Table 178: Performance of Provincial Government of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)
Table 179: Performance of Provincial Government of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)
Table 180: Performance of Provincial Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over
Pakistan)
449
452
455
458
Table 181: Biggest Current Issue in Pakistan (All Over Pakistan)
461
Table 182: Performance of the Ministry of Commerce (Federal)

Table 183: Performance of the Ministry of Defence (Federal)
Table 184: Performance of the Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics
and Privatization (Federal)
Table 185: Performance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Federal)
Table 186: Performance of the Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage
(Federal)
Table 187: Performance of the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication
(Federal)
Table 188: Performance of the Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control (Federal)
Table 189: Performance of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources (Federal)
Table 190: Performance of the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms (Federal)
Table 191: Performance of the Ministry of Railways (Federal)
Table 192: Performance of the Ministry of Water and Power (Federal)
464
467
470
Table 193: Performance of the Department for Education (Provincial)

Table 194: Performance of the Department for Health (Provincial)
Table 195: Performance of the Department for Interior (Provincial)
Table 196: Performance of the Department for Finance (Provincial)
Table 197: Performance of the Department for Agriculture (Provincial)
Table 198: Performance of the Department for Water and Irrigation (Provincial)
Table 199: Performance of the Department for Telecommunication (Provincial)
Table 200: Performance of the Department for Local Governments (Provincial)
Table 201: Performance of the Department for Mines and Minerals (Provincial)
Table 202: Performance of the Department for Forestry (Provincial)
Table 203: Performance of the Provincial Department for Planning and Development
(Provincial)
497
499
501
503
505
507
509
511
513
515
517
Appendix
Section A: Research Methodology
Section 3: Questionnaire
473
476
479
482
485
488
491
494
520
525
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PREFACE
PREFACE
ILDAT Report on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan: Second Year of Federal and
Provincial Governments: June 2014 May 2015 is the second in a series of reports, the first being published in
August 2014, to assess the Quality of Governance in Pakistan through a nationwide public opinion poll. Earlier, upon the
completion of first 100 days of these Governments in office in September 2013, PILDAT had undertaken and published a
public verdict on Performance of Governance and Democracy in First 100 Days of Pakistan's National and Provincial
Governments.
This is the second in a series of reports to examine the Quality of Governance based on public opinion upon the
completion of the 2nd year of National and Provincial Governments elected through the May 2013 General Election. As
democracy has made progress in Pakistan over the years, PILDAT believes the focus should be on performance of
democracy, separate from the process of democracy, to gauge how democracy has delivered to the citizens in terms of
providing good governance.
Framework for Assessing Quality of Governance
In order to assess the quality of governance on a scientific basis, PILDAT has developed an indigenous framework, which
takes into account key governance indicators within the context of Pakistan. The framework has been used to develop a
questionnaire for the public opinion poll.
The nationwide poll was conducted during June 02-12, 2015. It was conceived and undertaken by PILDAT. The
respondents for the survey included 3231 citizens from rural and urban areas from all the four provinces of Pakistan. The
fieldwork for the report was done in person at respondents' homes. The sample is also based on a cross-section of various
age, income, education and language groups of the population. Error margin is estimated to be approximately +2-5% at
95% confidence level.
PILDAT's initiative to assess Quality of Governance is by no means an exercise at finger pointing; it is, in fact, a
collaborative effort to highlight areas of strengths and potential areas requiring improvement in the quality of governance
in the five Governments. This public opinion poll report is an effort to assist elected political Governments at the Centre
and the Provinces to improve their quality of governance based on scientifically obtained public opinion.
Disclaimer
The results of this Report do not necessarily represent views held by PILDAT. The results only represent public opinion,
computed on the basis of views expressed by anonymous respondents selected through the procedure outlined in the
methodology section of this Report. PILDAT cannot be held liable to the users of this data. The analysis of this public
opinion poll results has been authored by Dr. Ijaz Shafi Gilani, a pioneer in political polls in Pakistan and an eminent
political scientist and analyst, upon request by PILDAT and using the results of the public opinion poll conducted by
PILDAT including fieldwork, data entry and the general research design.
Islamabad
October 2015
13
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Abbreviations and Acronyms

ANP
BA
BSc
BBA
B.Com
BNP
CM
CNG
COAS
DK
ECP
FA
F.S.c
GP
HH-Income
JI
JUI-F
KP
MA
M.S.c
MBA
M.Com
MQM
NAB
NEPRA
NR
OGRA
PAT
PEMRA
PM
PMAP
PML-N
PML-Q
PPP
PTI
SPSS
Awami National Party

Bachelor of Arts
Bachelor of Science
Bachelor of Business Administration
Bachelor of Commerce
Balochistan National Party
Chief Minister
Compressed Natural Gas
Chief of Army Staff
Don't Know
Election Commission of Pakistan
Faculty of Arts
Faculty of Science
Gallup Pakistan
Household Income
Jamaat-e-Islami
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Master of Arts
Master of Science
Master of Business Administration
Master of Commerce
Muttahida Quami Movement
National Accountability Bureau
National Electric Power Regulatory Authority
No Response
Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority
Pakistan Awami Tehreek
Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority
Prime Minister
Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party
Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz
Pakistan Muslim League Quaid
Pakistan People's Party
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
15
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
AFTER TWO YEARS, CHALLENGES TO GOOD GOVERNANCE STILL PERSIST
Two years into the General Elections of 2013, the incumbent Governments have been unable to convince the public over
their performance in key areas of governance. The survey by Pakistan's most prominent watcher on democracy and
governance, PILDAT, shows that popular opinion over the performance of elected governments, both at the federal and
provincial level, has been one of increasing scepticism and mistrust. Despite significant gains made in improving
Pakistan's security situation, a majority of the public still feels that the Government has been lacking in its drive to resolve
more pressing socio-economic and political problems facing the Country.
The PILDAT Report on Governance awards a number of 'Red Cards' and only a few 'Green Cards' while assessing the
performance of the Federal Government for key governance indicators during the past two years. Apart from achieving
popular support in only a few major areas, such as Law and Order, National Security, Utility Bills Collection,
Immunization of Children, Healthcare and Education, the overall public evaluation of the Federal Government has
been negative. Upon a further interpretation of the survey on governance, PILDAT believes that the public is particularly
concerned over a lack of effort by the Federal Government towards espousing accountability and transparency in the
working of the bureaucracy and institutions of governance. Subsequently, a majority of the public has disapproved of the
workings of all Federal Ministries, with the exception of the Ministry of Defense. The Government's efforts to curb
unemployment, alleviate poverty and resolve the energy crisis in the Country have also been viewed scepkically by the
public.
The survey findings in this PILDAT report also point to an encouraging public approval on key governance areas for the
Provincial Governments of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) as well as the Punjab. The Provincial Government of KP has
secured overwhelmingly popular support for its performance in the majority of governance areas. Whereas, the people of
Balochistan and Sindh have provided a scathing assessment of their respective Provincial Governments; negatively
rating them in most of the governance indicators.
The PILDAT survey shows that popular grievances are getting pinned down on the poor performance of politicians. The
politicians running their respective Provincial Governments and the Federal Government are being blamed for their
perceived failure to effectively tackle the major issues impeding Pakistan's development as well as showing a lack of
sincerity in effectively running their Departments and Ministries.
Additionally, the Report identifies popular distrust for State Institutions of accountability and security, such as the
National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Government Officers and the Police. Conversely, a significant section of the
population has exhibited a strong trust for the Nation's Armed Forces.
The findings of this PILDAT Report include a number of highlights, which are reported in this Executive Summary. More
detailed findings are presented in the 2-volume Report, which PILDAT is releasing for the benefit of all political
stakeholders
17
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 1: Core Governance Indicators

No.
18
Indicator
Explanation
Law and Order
Measures the public opinion on Government's

Performance at maintaining peace, security, law &
order
Poverty Alleviation

performance on eradicating poverty
Education

achievements in reforming and improving the
education system and resources in the country
Healthcare
Measures the public opinion on Government's success

at improving healthcare facilities and resources across
the country
Transparency
Gauges the public opinion on the level of openness

and public engagement by the Government with
regards to policies and implementation
Energy Production and Management
Measures the public opinion on the current state of

electricity generation, supply, and services, as well as
reforms in the power generation sector
Anti-Corruption
Measures the public opinion on Government's success

at eradicating and controlling corruption
Investment Friendliness
Measures public opinion on Government's

performance on improving local and foreign
investment
Tax Collection

performance at improving tax collection
10
Utility Bills Collection

performance at efficiently collecting utility bills
11
Management of Unemployment

performance at managing unemployment
12
Development Programmes
Measures the public opinion on effectiveness of the

Government's development policies and
implementation
13
Quality and Independence of Civil

Service

achievement at ensuring the impartiality and
independence of Civil Servants
14
Merit-based Recruitment and

Promotions

performance at using merit to recruit and promote
employees in public organizations
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
15
Use of Technologies for Better

Governance
Measures the public opinion on Government's use of

technologies to improve governance and service
delivery
16
Clean, Efficient and Economic Efficient

Public Procurement

performance at transparent and open public
procurement policies
17
Management of Supply of Agricultural

Inputs

performance regarding supply and distribution of
agricultural inputs
18
Environmental Sustainability

performance at reducing environmental degradation
and pollution
19
Disaster Preparedness & Management

performance at creating and ensuring effective plans
and strategies to counter and mitigate natural disasters
20
Immunization of Children

performance at immunizing children especially
against polio
21
Devolution of Power to the Lower Tiers
Gauges the public opinion on the Government's

performance at devolving powers to the local level and
establishing local governments
22
Access to an Efficient Justice System

performance at improving and streamlining the justice
system in the country
23
National Security
Measures the public opinion on Federal Government's

performance on national security
24
Foreign Policy Management
Measures the public opinion on performance of the

Federal Government in managing foreign affairs
25
Performance of Regulatory Bodies
Measures the public opinion on Federal Government's

performance at ensuring the independence and
effective operation of Regulatory Bodies
26
Merit-based Appointments in
Regulatory Bodies

performance at recruiting and promoting through merit
27
Management of Inflation

performance at managing inflation in the country
28
Water Resource Development and

Management

performance at developing and effectively managing
water resources in the country
19
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Federal Government's Scorecard

The scorecard shows the Federal Government's Approval Rating, i.e., sum of responses in category 'Approved a Lot' and
'Approved Somewhat', on the core governance indicators. A rating, less than 50% shows that more people have
disapproved or chose to remain silent on the issue. It has been shaded as red on the Approval Scorecard column in Table
2. Similarly, an Approval Rating of more than 50% implies that a minority of the population has expressed disapproval or
has chosen to remain silent on the issue. An Approval Rating exceeding 50% has been allotted the colour green on the
Approval Scorecard column seen in Table 2. In Table 2, we have also ranked different indicators from highest Approval
Rating to lowest Approval Rating, in order to outline areas where the Federal Government has performed well in gaining
public's perceived approval.
Table 2: Federal Government's Scorecard (National Evaluation)

No.
20
Indicator
Approval Rating
2015
Approval
Scorecard
(Green or
Red)
Ranking
Law & Order
55%
Poverty Alleviation
28%
14
Education
64%
Healthcare
54%
Transparency
30%
13
Energy Production & Management
30%
13
Anti-Corruption
27%
16
44%
Tax Collection
38%
10
10
56%
11
25%
18
12
44%
13
Quality & Independence of Civil Service
26%
17
14
Merit-based Recruitment and Promotions
34%
11
15
Use of Technologies for Better Governance
48%
16
Clean, Efficient and Economic Public

Procurement
28%
15
17
Management & Supply of Agricultural Inputs
40%
18
33%
12
19
Disaster Preparedness & Management
38%
10
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
20
85%
21
29%
14
27%
16
28%
15
24
Devolution of Powers to Lower TiersEstablishment of Local Governments

Devolution of Powers to Lower Tiers
Distribution of Resources to Provincial and
Local Governments
Devolution of Powers to Lower Tiers- Effective
Devolution of Power
38%
10
25
National Security
53%
26
44%
27
30%
13
28
Merit-based Appointments in Regulatory

Bodies
28%
15
29
33%
12
30
Water Resource Development & Management
38%
10
22
23
GREEN SCORE CARD INDICATORS
RED SCORE CARD INDICATORS
24
Legend: Green means Approval Rating for the Indicator is more than 50%
Red means Approval Rating for the indicator is less than 50%
Figure 1: Governance Track Record - Negative Evaluation Indicators

GOVERNANCE TRACK-RECORD
NEGATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
30%
28%
30%
27%
ENERGY
PRODUCTION &
MANAGEMENT
POVERTY
ANTI-CORRUPTION TRANSPARENCY
ALLEVIATION
25%
26%
MANAGEMENT
QUALITY AND
OF
INDEPENDENCE
UNEMPLOYMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE
21
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of the Federal Government Public Opinion Mostly Negative

The Approval Ratings in 2015 seen in Table 2 show that on most indicators, the public evaluated the Federal
Government's governance performance negatively. 24 out of the 30 Governance indicators assessed for the Federal
Government received an Approval Rating below 50%, thus implying that the majority of the survey respondents
disapproved of the performance of the Federal Government in those 24 indicators. The Federal Government's governance
performance has been positively evaluated only on six indicators: Immunization of Children (85%); Education
(64%); Utility Bills Collection (56%); Law and Order (55%); Healthcare (54%) and National Security (53%). In
all the remaining policy areas that were included in the survey, the majority opinion was one of disapproval on the
performance of the Federal Government. On all the remaining policy indicators, more than 50% of the respondents
deemed the performance of the Federal Government to be unsatisfactory. On the indicators of Poverty Alleviation
(28%), Transparency (30%), Management of Unemployment (25%), Quality & Independence of Civil Service
(26%), Merit-based Appointments in Regulatory Bodies (28%), Devolution of Powers to Lower TiersEstablishment of Local Governments (29%), the public was extremely critical of the Government's performance as
can be seen by the fact that Approval Ratings for these indicators were below 30% of all respondents.
Renewed Hope for the Government on Foreign Policy, Procurement, Investment, Agriculture
and Development
Crucial distinction must also be made for those indicators where the Approval Ratings are closer to the 50% mark, hence
implying that the public's overall assessment on such indicators is currently divided, with negative evaluations slightly
outpacing positive evaluations. For instance, on Foreign Policy Management (44%), Development Programmes
(44%), Investment Friendliness (44%) and the Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (40%), Federal
Government's negative evaluation is only slightly greater than its positive assessment. These indicators highlight areas
where the Federal Government has managed to perform well, and has also been evaluated positively by a significant
proportion of the public. Continued attention and reform in these areas can help improve the Approval Ratings for the
Federal Government.
Figure 2: Governance Track Record - Positive Evaluation Indicators

GOVERNANCE TRACK-RECORD
POSITIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
85%
64%
IMMUNIZATION
22
EDUCATION
56%
UTILITY BILLS
COLLECTION
55%
LAW & ORDER
54%
HEALTHCARE
53%
NATIONAL
SECURITY
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Federal Government Strong in areas of National Security, Education, Immunization of

Children, Healthcare and Utility Bills Collection
Public opinion on the Federal Government's two year governance performance indicates that The PML-N led
Government has garnered positive assessments by the majority of the public on Immunization of Children (85%),
Healthcare (54%), Education (64%), National Security (53%), Law & Order (55%) and Utility Bills Collection
(56%). These indicators have been ranked as green on the Approval Scorecard and suggest that the Government's efforts
to strengthen Pakistan in these respective areas have been well received by a majority of the Pakistani public. Given
Pakistan's on-going struggle against violent militancy and the relative success of the operation Zarb-e-Azb by the
Pakistani Army, this positive score reflects the public's expectation that this Government can succeed in purging rampant
terrorism and violent militancy in the Country. Furthermore, the aggressive Polio Campaign undertaken by the Federal
Government to make Pakistan a Polio-free Nation has been positively perceived by the public.
Ability of the Centre to Curb Poverty and Unemployment - Question Marks Remain
In contrast, the current Government's performance on Poverty Alleviation and Management of Unemployment has
been poorly assessed by the people of Pakistan; with Approval Ratings of 28% and 25% respectively. These issues are
critical in resuscitating Pakistan's socio-economic growth and development. A negative assessment by an overwhelming
majority of the representative sample of the Pakistani public on these indicators reveals the public's dissatisfaction with
the Government's efforts of these two years aimed at resolving these key challenges that affect the daily livelihoods of
ordinary citizens across the Country.
The Government's often hyped about economic reforms and policies have, as yet, failed to trickle down to the masses in
the form of palpable positive changes in livelihoods with the public feeling that unemployment, and poverty remain the
core economic challenges for the people of Pakistan. Alternatively put, the Government's macroeconomic policy reforms
may be working, but microeconomic improvements are yet to take root in the country after several years of economic
decline and stagnation.
Public Verdict on Resolving the Energy Crisis: Federal Government Remains Clueless
The 'Energy Crisis' in Pakistan continues to remain a massive hurdle in the social and economic development of Pakistan.
Despite the Federal Government's apparent efforts and policy focus designed to reform the Energy Sector and increase the
production capacity, the Pakistani public has deemed the efforts of these two years as insufficient. On Energy
Production and Management, the Government was able to get an Approval Rating of only 30%, thus illustrating the
substantial level of dissatisfaction with the continuing energy crisis in the country particularly with incessant load
shedding and power outages that have not only caused misery to the urban and rural diaspora but have also crippled
industries and businesses nationwide.
A Persistent Lack of Accountability & Transparency in the Public Sector

Accountability and Transparency have been the usual political slogans used by political parties at the time of elections.
Good governance enshrined with concepts of 'Accountability and Transparency' have, over the years, also gained public
legitimacy as key goals that Pakistan needs to achieve. Public discourse on this issue is visible through media attention it
has captured as well as the recent focus by the Supreme Court on a number of graft cases as well as grilling of the Chief
Accountability watchdog, the NAB, by the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
The Government scored rather poorly on indicators of Transparency and Anti-Corruption. On Transparency, the
th
Government scored an Approval Rating of only 30% (ranked 13 in terms of public approval), while in the fight against
corruption the Government fared even worse in the eyes of the public, with the indicator of Anti-Corruption getting an
th
even lower Approval Rating of 27%. Furthermore, on Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (34%, ranked at 11
in terms of public approval), Poverty Alleviation (28%, ranked at 14th), Quality and Independence of Civil Service
(26%, ranked at 17th), a resounding majority of the respondents was convinced that the Government and its supporting
institutions of governance are still strongly afflicted with issues of corruption, a lack of merit and fairness in recruitments
23
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
and appointments and malpractice. These numbers show that the current Federal Government needs to do more in
shaking off the lack of trust and perceptions of rampant corruption in its management of the Country's affairs.
Provincial Government Scorecard (Provincial Governance Evaluation)

The questions included and asked in the provincial segment of the opinion poll asked respondents to evaluate the
performance of their Provincial Government on the core governance indicators relevant to Provincial governance.
The Approval Rating Scores published here provide an indication of how residents from each Province evaluated the
state of governance in their Province. The list of indicators used for Provincial governance analysis is slightly different
and includes subjects that have been devolved to the provinces in the aftermath of the 18th Constitutional Amendment.
Table 3: Provincial Scores

No.
24
Indicator
Provincial Scores
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
Law & Order
44%
72%
51%
53%
Poverty Alleviation
13%
46%
29%
16%
Education
45%
80%
75%
38%
Healthcare
35%
75%
60%
35%
Transparency
24%
55%
25%
21%
18%
40%
37%
21%
Anti-Corruption
19%
51%
23%
23%
32%
45%
44%
20%
Tax Collection
34%
48%
35%
40%
10
39%
55%
60%
40%
11
9%
41%
25%
12%
12
25%
49%
51%
23%
13

Service
25%
37%
22%
26%
14
Merit-Based Recruitments and

Promotions
18%
68%
39%
19%
15

Governance
33%
58%
52%
29%
16

Procurement
26%
47%
24%
16%
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
17
Management of Supply of
Agricultural Inputs
31%
56%
41%
25%
18
20%
59%
32%
26%
19
Disaster Preparedness and

Management
32%
56%
43%
22%
20
79%
90%
91%
77%
21
Devolution of Power to the Lower

Tiers Establishment of Local
Governments
51%
56%
26%
28%
22

Tiers Distribution of Resources to
Local and Provincial Governments
27%
40%
24%
26%
23

Tiers Effective Devolution of Power
25%
40%
21%
26%
24
32%
59%
39%
34%
25
Public Transport
30%
57%
61%
27%
26
Access to Safe Drinking Water
20%
61%
44%
18%
27
Sanitation
14%
52%
35%
23%
28
Water Resources Development and

Management
21%
57%
40%
29%
GREEN SCORE CARD

INDICATORS
2/28
18/28
8/28
2/28
RED SCORE CARD INDICATORS
26/28
10/28
20/28
26/28
Legend: Green means Approval Rating for the Indicator is more than 50% Red means Approval Rating for the
indicator is less than 50%
Performance of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government A Clear Front-Runner

The KP Government achieved positive Approval Ratings by the majority of the respondents in a resounding 18 out of
the 28 Provincial Governance indicators covered in this Study: Law and Order (72%), Education (80%), Healthcare
(75%), Transparency (55%), Anti-Corruption (51%), Utility Bills Collection (55%), Merit-Based Recruitments
and Promotions (68%), Use of Technologies for Better Governance (58%), Management and Supply of
Agricultural Inputs (56%), Immunization of Children (90%), Environmental Sustainability (59%), Access to an
Efficient Justice System (59%), Sanitation (52%), Access to Safe Drinking Water (61%), Disaster Preparedness
and Management (56%) and Public Transport (57%), thereby dispelling any challenge from the Provincial
Government in Punjab, where the PML-N was able to secure Approval Ratings in only 8 out of the 28 governance
indicators.
More impressively, the KP Government barely scored negative ratings in almost all of the other indicators, performing
substantially better than the Punjab Government in the eyes of the public. A significant proportion of the respondents
approved of the performance of the Government in KP on the following performance indicators: Poverty Alleviation
(46%), Management of Unemployment (41%), Investment Friendliness (45%), Tax Collection (48%),
Development Programmes (49%), and Management of Unemployment (41%). These Approval Ratings illustrate
25
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
the positive perception of the work being done by the Government in these areas.
It was only in a few performance indicators that the Provincial Government of KP was viewed by a majority of the
respondents to have performed relatively poorly: Quality & Independence of Civil Service (37%) and Energy
Production and Management (40%). Even then, a significant proportion of the respondents (above 30%) still
approved of the work being carried out by the KP Government regarding improvements in Energy production and
management and the Civil Service.
Public Perception on Performance of the Provincial Government of Punjab

Despite lagging behind KP in terms of performance, the Provincial Government of Punjab was still able to outscore the
rest of the Provincial Governments in terms of performance in the policy areas outlined in this study.
The Punjab Government's best Approval Rating was registered in Immunization of Children (91%). Similarly, the
Provincial Government's concerted focus on infrastructure improvement, with Public Transport and Development
Programmes receiving positive Approval Ratings of 61% and 51% in 2015, respectively. Much has been made of the
Punjab Government's focus on improving the educational infrastructure and services in the Province. At present, the
Government's reforms and projects in Education garnered a positive Approval Rating of 75%. Punjab Government also
performed well in the Healthcare sector, generating a positive response of 60% by the majority of the respondents.
Furthermore, the Government's efforts at stabilising the economy of Punjab also observed a positive perception by the
public, as can be seen by the positive Approval Ratings secured by Punjab in the Collection of Utility Bills (60%). In
total, the Punjab Government generated positive Governance Approval Ratings in 8 out of the 28 indicators studied for
the four provinces.
Approval Ratings for 4 indicators for the Punjab Government were barely negative, in comparison to 7 such policy
indicators for the KP Government. On these indicators the negative evaluations only slightly outpaced positive
assessments of the Provincial Government's performance, which alludes to Approval Ratings that can easily cross the
50% mark if the Provincial Government retains its focus and policy direction: Investment Friendliness (44%),
Management of Supply of Agricultural Products (41%), Access to Safe Drinking Water (44%), and Disaster
Preparedness & Management (43%).
However, the PML-N led Provincial Government in Punjab also reflects some of the negative scores achieved by the
party's Government at the Federal level. The Punjab Government received the lowest Approval Ratings in Energy
Production & Management (37%), Poverty Alleviation (29%), Anti-Corruption (23%), Transparency (25%),
Management of Unemployment (25%), and Quality and Independence of Civil Service (22%). A majority of the
public opinion severely disapproved of the lack of work being done in alleviating poverty and reducing unemployment,
both at the Federal and the Provincial level, with Approval Ratings not even crossing the 30% mark. These trends seem
to be reflective of the notion that despite initiating macro level projects, the Government of the PML-N is still lacking in
providing some of the basic necessities of life to people.
The Government in Balochistan Public Opinion Overwhelmingly Negative

Of the four provinces evaluated and compared in this study for the respective Provincial Governments' governance
performance, the empirical results clearly rank the Provincial Government of Balochistan on the lowest tier in terms of
its performance in the governance indicators.
The people of Balochistan evaluated their Provincial Government's governance track-record negatively on 26 out of the
28 indicators included in this survey. This prevalent negativity in the province reflects the poor state of governance in
the Provincial Government. The Balochistan Government scored the lowest Approval Ratings on: Anti-Corruption
(19%), Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (18%), Energy Production and Management (18%), Poverty
Alleviation (13%), Management of Unemployment (9%), Environmental Sustainability (20%), Access to Safe
Drinking Water (20%) and Sanitation (14%). In all these governance indicators, the Approval Rating given to the
Provincial Government was less than 20%, thus implying that a dominant majority of the Balochi public was extremely
26
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
critical of the performance of the Provincial Government. The Balochistan Government's positive Approval Rating was
recorded on Immunization of Children (79%) and Devoluation of Power to the Lower Tiers-Establishment of
Local Government (51%) . The empirical results obtained from this study clearly indicate that the people of
Balochistan are undoubtedly the ones most dissatisfied and disillusioned with the performance of their government,
compared to all the other provinces.
Public Verdict on Performance of Sindh Government - One of Extreme Disapproval

The Provincial Government of Sindh also suffered from a fate similar to the one experienced by the Government of
Balochistan, two years since coming into power after the elections of 2013. The Government of Pakistan People's Party
in Sindh also recorded Approval Ratings below the 50% mark in 26 out of 28 governance indicators, managing positive
Approval Ratings only in Immunization of Children (77%) and Law and Order (53%).
The Sindh Government scored the lowest Approval Ratings on: Poverty Alleviation (16%), Management of
Unemployment (12%), Access to Safe Drinking Water (18%), Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (19%)
and Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurement(16%). The proportion of the Sindhi respondents that
approved of the work being done by the Government in these policy issues was less than 20% of all respondents, thus
highlighting the overwhelming negativity persisting among the public regarding the performance of their Government
on these areas.
Table 4: Governance Scores: National Scores Vs. Provincial Scores

Indicator
National
Scores
Provincial Scores
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
Law and Order
55%
44%
72%
51%
53%
Poverty Alleviation
28%
13%
46%
29%
16%
Education
64%
45%
80%
75%
38%
Healthcare
54%
35%
75%
60%
35%
Transparency
30%
24%
55%
25%
21%
Energy Production and

Management
30%
18%
40%
37%
21%
Anti-Corruption
27%
19%
51%
23%
23%
Investment
Friendliness
44%
32%
45%
44%
20%
Tax Collection
38%
34%
48%
35%
40%
10
56%
39%
55%
60%
40%
11
Management of
Unemployment
25%
9%
41%
25%
12%
12
Development
Programmes
44%
25%
49%
51%
23%
13
Quality and
Independence of Civil
Service
26%
25%
37%
22%
26%
27
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
14
Merit-Based
Recruitment and
34%
18%
68%
39%
19%
15
Use of Technologies
for Better Governance
48%
33%
58%
52%
29%
16

Economic Public
Procurement
Management of
Supply of Agricultural
Inputs
28%
26%
47%
24%
16%
40%
31%
56%
41%
25%
18
Environmental
Sustainability
33%
20%
59%
32%
26%
19
and Management
38%
32%
56%
43%
22%
20
Immunization of
Children
85%
79%
90%
91%
77%
21
Access to an Efficient
Justice System
38%
32%
59%
39%
34%
22
Water Resources
Development and
Management
38%
21%
57%
40%
29%
17
Performance of the Prime Minister: 73% provide Approval Ratings in 2015

While 73% of Pakistanis state that they rate his performance as 'Good' to 'Very Good', 24% rated his performance in the
last two years as 'Bad' to 'Very Bad'.
Performance of Chief Ministers

Table 5: Performance of Chief Ministers
Very Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Approval
Rating 2015
CM Punjab
33%
45%
10%
4%
78%
CM Sindh
5%
24%
25%
18%
29%
CM KP
10%
28%
17%
12%
38%
CM Balochistan
7%
21%
16%
13%
28%
Chief Minister
Respondents from across Pakistan were asked to evaluate the performance of the four Chief Ministers. The Approval
Ratings of each Chief Minister in 2015 are given in Figure 3.
28
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 3: Performance of the Chief Ministers

78%
38%
29%
CM Punjab
28%
CM Sindh
CM KP
CM Balochistan
Performance of CM Punjab: 78% provide Approval Ratings in 2015

The Chief Minister of Punjab, Shahbaz Sharif, received the highest rating from respondents across Pakistan, with an
aggregate Approval Rating of 78%, eclipsing all others. 33% of the respondents rated his performance as 'Very Good'
while 45% rated it as 'Good'. 14% respondents rated his performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Performance of CM Sindh: 29% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
In contrast with CM Punjab, CM Sindh, Syed Qaim Ali Shah, is perceived as a less popular figure by the public. A
significant 43% of the respondents rated his performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. 29% of the respondents rated CM
Sindh's performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. Thus, the Chief Minister of Sindh received the second lowest Approval
Rating amongst the Chief Ministers of the four provinces.
Performance of CM KP: 38% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
Chief Minister of KP, Pervez Khattak's performance ratings are also in the negative when respondents from across
Pakistan were asked to evaluate his overall performance. 29% of the respondents rated his performance as 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad' while 38% of the public evaluated his performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Performance of CM Balochistan: 28% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
Chief Minister of Balochistan, Abdul Malik Baloch fares the worst in terms of his overall Approval Rating amongst the
ratings of the Chief Ministers of the other provinces. While 28% respondents rated his performance as 'Good' or 'Very
Good', a larger proportion of 29% of the public rated his performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Table 6: Performance of Provincial Governments

Very Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Approval
Rating 2015
Punjab
32%
44%
10%
4%
76%
Sindh
5%
25%
24%
19%
30%
Balochistan
5%
23%
18%
13%
28%
KP
10%
28%
16%
12%
38%
Province
29
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Respondents from across Pakistan were asked to evaluate the performance of the four Provincial Governments. The
Approval Ratings of each Provincial Government in 2015 are given in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Performance of Provincial Governments
76%
38%
30%
Punjab
Sindh
28%
KP
Balochistan
Performance of Punjab Provincial Government: 76% provide Approval Ratings in 2015

32% of the respondents rated the Punjab Government's performance as 'Good' and 44% rated it as 'Very Good'. In
comparison, a small proportion of 14% of the respondents rated the performance of the Government as 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad'. At this point in time, with an Approval Rating of 77% in 2015, the Punjab Government enjoys the healthiest
Approval Rating of the four provinces.
Performance of Sindh Provincial Government: 30% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Sindh Government is evaluated negatively by the majority of the respondents from across Pakistan. 43% of all
respondents rated the Provincial Government's performance negatively, while only 30% were in approval of the
performance of the Provincial Government. Thus, the Government of Sindh's performance is rated as the second lowest
out of the four provinces.
Performance of Balochistan Provincial Government: 28% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Balochistan Government is evaluated negatively by the majority of the respondents form across Pakistan. 30% of all
respondents rated the Provincial Government's performance negatively, while only 28% of the public stood in approval
of the Provincial Government. These scores give the Balochistan Provincial Government the lowest Approval Rating in
2015 amongst the four provinces.
Performance of KP Provincial Government: 38% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The KP Government is also evaluated negatively but still fares better than the Governments of Sindh and Balochistan.
28% of all respondents rated the Provincial Government's performance negatively, while 38% gave a positive
assessment of the Provincial Government, thus giving KP an Approval Rating of 38%.
30
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 7: Trust in Institutions

A lot
Somewhat
Little
Not at all
Approval
Rating 2015
NAB
8%
22%
20%
11%
30%
Government Officers
7%
25%
30%
25%
32%
Army
46%
29%
8%
5%
75%
Police
11%
21%
25%
32%
32%
Institution
Figure 5: Trust in Institutions

75%
30%
32%
NAB
Government Officers
32%
Army
Police
Trust in Institutions; NAB: 30% provide Approval Ratings in 2015

At present, Pakistanis appear uncertain about the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). 31% respondents assert that
they have little to no trust at all in the NAB, while 30% report that they have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of Trust' in the Bureau,
thus giving the NAB the lowest Approval Rating out of the institutions under discussion.
Trust in Institutions; Government Officers: 32% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
A majority of the representative sample of Pakistanis (55%) state that they have little to no trust at all in Government
officers. However, only 29% of them state they have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of Trust' in the country's bureaucrats, thereby
suggesting that the Pakistani public at large does not trust Government officers.
Trust in Institutions; Armed Forces: 75% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
At present, 75% Pakistanis claim to have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of Trust' in the Country's Armed Forces, thus becoming the
Institution rated the highest by Pakistanis. On the other hand, only 13% Pakistanis state that they have little to no trust at
all in the Armed Forces.
Trust in Institutions; Police: 32% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
A substantial 57% of all respondents stated that they had little to no trust at all in Pakistan's Police. Only 32% of the
31
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
respondents have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of Trust' in the Police Force, thus making it one of the institutions whose
performance has been deemed unsatisfactory by the majority of the representative sample of the Pakistani public.
Biggest Current Issue
The biggest identified challenge for the Country is the Energy Crisis, which is currently identified by 25% of the Survey
Respondents as the biggest problem facing the state. Unemployment came in second, with 19% Respondents
identifying it as a serious challenge for the Country. The problem of maintaining Law & Order and Peace in light of
Terrorism ranked as the third biggest problem, as identified by 15% of the respondents. Finally, Poverty was identified
by 12% of the public respondents as a major national problem facing the Country at this point in time. However, the
problem of Corruption was not perceived as a major issue by Pakistanis; with only 3% of the representative sample of
the Pakistani public considering it as a major issue facing Pakistan in 2015.
Table 8: Performance of Federal Ministries
32
Federal Ministry
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
Approval Rating
2015
Ministry of Commerce
11%
36%
18%
6%
28%
47%
Ministry of Defence
14%
41%
15%
6%
24%
55%
Ministry of Finance,
Revenue, Economic
Affairs, Statistics and
Privatisation
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
7%
26%
23%
9%
33%
33%
7%
30%
18%
9%
35%
37%
Ministry of Information,
Broadcasting and National
Heritage
9%
32%
18%
7%
31%
41%
Ministry of Information
Technology and
Telecommunication
11%
34%
14%
7%
32%
45%
Ministry of Interior and

Narcotics Control
7%
21%
21%
17%
31%
28%
Ministry of Petroleum and

Natural Resources
9%
31%
20%
15%
23%
40%
Ministry of Planning,
Development and Reforms
8%
32%
16%
11%
0%
40%
Ministry of Railways
13%
30%
17%
16%
22%
43%
Ministry of Water and

Power
10%
17%
20%
36%
16%
27%
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 6: Performance of Federal Ministries
Performance of Ministry of Commerce: 47% provide Approval Ratings in 2015

The Ministry of Commerce performed decently as an encouraging 47% of the respondents approved of its performance
in 2015. 24% however negatively rated the performance of the Ministry.
Performance of Ministry of Defence: 55% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Ministry of the Defence was the only Ministry under the Federal Government whose performance was approved by
a majority of the respondents, representative of the larger Pakistani Public (55%) in 2015. Only 21% of the public felt
that the performance of the Defence Ministry was not up to the mark.
Performance of Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics and Privatisation: 33% provide
Approval Ratings in 2015
The performance of this particular Ministry was positively rated by a minority of the respondents as less than 50% of the
public (33%) voted the performance as 'Very Good' or 'Good' in 2015. On the other hand, 32% of the survey respondents
rated the performance of the Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics and Privatisation as 'Bad' or
'Very Bad'.
Performance of Ministry of Foreign Affairs: 37% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs was positively voted by less than half of the respondents as only 37% Pakistanis rated the
Ministry's performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. On the other hand, 27% respondents perceived the performance of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs to be 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
33
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage: 41% provide Approval Ratings in
2015
The Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage did comparatively better as 41% of the respondents
approved of the performance of this Ministry in 2015. With added effort, the Approval Ratings for this Ministry have the
potential to outpace the fifty percent mark and resultantly gain the approval of the majority of Pakistanis. As it stands,
25% of the public has voted the performance of this Ministry as Bad or Very Bad.
Performance of Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication: 45% provide Approval Ratings in
2015
The Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication also performed well as a significant proportion of the
Pakistani public (45%) surveyed, gave approval in 2015, only a few percentage points behind the majority approval
mark of fifty percent. Conversely, only 21% Pakistanis gave negative reviews over the performance of this Ministry.
Further improvements in the workings of this Ministry can contribute in this Ministry being approved by a majority of
the Pakistani public.
Performance of Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control: 28% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
A majority of the public disapproved of the performance of this Ministry. Only 28% of the respondents rated the
performance of the Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control as Good or Very Good. On the other hand, a significant
38% of the public believed the performance of this Ministry to be 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Performance of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources: 40% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Approval Ratings for this Ministry also exhibit encouraging signs as a significant 40% of the public rated the
performance of this Ministry as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. This implies that with added effort, the Approval Rating can be
improved to constitute the opinion of the majority of Pakistanis. On the flip side, 35% of the public felt that the
performance of this Ministry was 'Bad' or 'Very Bad' in 2015.
Performance of Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms: 40% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
A significant proportion of the respondents (40%) approved of the performance of this Ministry in 2015. Hence,
additional improvements in the performance of the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms can result in the
Approval Ratings crossing the fifty percent mark and thus being approved by a majority of the public. As it stands in
2015, 27% Pakistanis still feel the performance of this Ministry is not up to the mark and have voted 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'
against it.
Performance of Ministry of Railways: 43% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Performance of Ministry of Railways in 2015 was encouraging as 43% respondents were in approval. On the other
hand, 33% of the responded were in disapproval of the performance of this Ministry.
Performance of Ministry of Water and Power: 27% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The performance of this Ministry was rated negatively by a majority of the public respondents as 56% of them felt that
the performance was 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. On the other hand, only 27% of the respondents felt that the performance of the
Ministry was 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
34
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 9: Performance of Provincial Departments

Provincial Department
Balochistan
Approval
Rating 2015
KP Approval
Rating 2015
Punjab Approval
Rating 2015
Sindh Approval
Rating 2015
Provincial Department for

Education
61%
86%
78%
41%

Health
49%
85%
67%
38%
Provincial Home
Department (Interior)
39%
57%
33%
33%

Finance
31%
56%
31%
24%

Agriculture
22%
53%
40%
25%

Water and Irrigation
16%
53%
39%
22%

Telecommunication
28%
50%
35%
25%

Local Governments
34%
56%
26%
23%

Mines and Minerals
19%
36%
16%
18%

Forestry
22%
55%
24%
18%

Planning and
Development
29%
48%
39%
29%
35
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 7: Performance of Provincial Departments
Performance of Provincial Department for Education: Highest Approval Rating for KP in 2015
A resounding majority of the respondents of KP approved of the performance of the Provincial Department for Education
within their respective Province as 86% respondents felt that the performance was 'Very Good' or 'Good'. Both Punjab and
Balochistan recorded Approval Ratings above 50%, hence the majority of the respondents in these provinces were
positive regarding the work done by their Governments regarding education. Sindh recorded the lowest Approval Rating
as only 41% of the public approved of the performance of Sindh Government.
Performance of Provincial Department for Health: KP Records Highest Approval Rating in 2015
The Provincial Department for Health performed well in KP as a significant 85% of the respondents rated its as 'Good' or
'Very Good'. Punjab came in second with an Approval Rating of 67%. In both Balochistan (49%) and Sindh (38%), the
majority of the public negatively rated the performance of their respective Government.
Performance of Provincial Home Department: Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces except KP in 2015
A majority of the public negatively rated the performance of the Provincial Home Department. Only a minority of the
public approved of the performance of their Government regarding this Department in Balochistan (39%), Punjab (33%)
and Sindh (33%). However, a majority of respondents in KP (57%) approved of the performance of the Home Department
in 2015.
Performance of Provincial Department for Finance: Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces except KP in 2015
The Finance Department also generally performed poorly at the Provincial level as a minority of the public of Punjab
(31%), Sindh (24%) and Balochistan (31%) rated its performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. On the other hand, 56%
respondents in KP approved of the performance of the Finance Department and voted either 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Performance of Provincial Department for Agriculture: Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces except KP in
2015
The Department of Agriculture also performed poorly in Punjab (40%), Sindh (25%) and Balochistan (22%) as the
majority respondents in these Provinces rated the Provincial Department negatively, either 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. In KP, a
majority (53%) approved of the performance of their Provincial Department for Agriculture.
36
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of Provincial Department for Water and Irrigation: Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces
except KP in 2015
The Department of Water and Irrigation also generally performed poorly at the Provincial level as a minority of the public
of Punjab (39%), Sindh (22%) and Balochistan (16%) rated its performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. On the other hand,
53% respondents in KP approved of the performance of the Department and voted either 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Performance of Provincial Department for Telecommunication: Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces
except KP in 2015
The Department for Telecommunication also performed poorly in Punjab (35%), Sindh (25%), and Balochistan (28%) as
the majority respondents in these Provinces rated the Provincial Department negatively, either 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. In KP,
a majority (50%) approved of the performance of their Provincial Department.
Performance of Provincial Department for Local Governments: Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces
except KP in 2015
The Department for Local Governments also performed poorly in Punjab (26%), Sindh (23%), and Balochistan (34%) as
the majority respondents in these Provinces rated the Provincial Department negatively, either 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. In KP,
a majority (56%) approved of the performance of their Provincial Department.
Performance of Provincial Department for Mines and Minerals: People from all Provinces provide Negative
The Provincial Department for Mines and Minerals was ranked the lowest in terms of performance by all respondents in
2015 as the majority public of all the Provinces rated their respective Provincial Departments negatively. A minority of
the respondents in Punjab (16%), Sindh (18%), Balochistan (19%) and KP (36%) rated the performance of their
Department for Mines and Minerals as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. The majority rated the performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Performance of Provincial Department for Forestry: Highest Approval Rating for KP in 2015
The Department for Forestry also performed poorly in all Provinces except KP as it got the approval of only a minority of
the respondents in the Provinces. 55% respondents in KP felt that the performance of their Department was 'Very Good' or
'Good'. In comparison, only 24%, 18% and 22% respondents in Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan respectively, approved of
the performance of their respective Provincial Departments.
Performance of Provincial Department for Planning and Development: People from all Provinces provide
Negative Approval Ratings in 2015
The Department for Planning and Development was ranked negatively in terms of performance by all respondents in
2015 as the majority public of all the Provinces rated their respective Provincial Departments negatively. A minority of
the respondents in Punjab (39%), Sindh (29%), Balochistan (29%) and KP (48%) rated the performance of their
Departments as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. The majority rated the performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
37
Quality of Governance Federal Government

Views of Respondents from All Over Pakistan
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 10: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance Federal Government
No.
Indicator
Approval Rating 2015
Law and Order
55%
48%
Poverty Alleviation
28%
23%
Education
64%
48%
Healthcare
54%
45%
Transparency
30%
45%
30%
23%
Anti-Corruption
27%
26%
44%
43%
Tax Collection
38%
40%
10
56%
45%
11
25%
31%
12
44%
46%
13
Quality and Independence of Civil Service
26%
32%
14
Merit- Based Recruitment and Promotions
34%
29%
15
48%
38%
16

Procurements
28%
36%
17

Inputs
40%
45%
18
33%
36%
19
Disaster Preparedness and Management
38%
38%
20
85%
56%
21
Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersEstablishment of Local Governments
29%
30%
41
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
22
Devolution of Powers to the Tower TiersDistribution of Resources to Provincial and

Local Governments
23
Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersEffective Devolution of Power
24
Access to Efficient Justice System
38%
36%
25
National Security
53%
61%
26
44%
48%
27
30%
38%
28
Merit Based Appointments in Regulatory

Bodies
28%
38%
29
33%
25%
30

Management
38%
38%
34%
27%
28%
33%
Table 11: Comparative Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance For all
Five Governments
No. Indicator
42
All
Balochistan
Pakistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
Law and Order
55%
44%
72%
51%
53%
Poverty Alleviation
28%
13%
46%
29%
16%
Education
64%
45%
80%
75%
38%
Healthcare
54%
35%
75%
60%
35%
Transparency
30%
24%
55%
25%
21%
30%
18%
40%
37%
21%
Anti-Corruption
27%
19%
51%
23%
23%
44%
32%
45%
44%
20%
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
38%
34%
48%
35%
40%
10 Utility Bills Collection
56%
39%
55%
60%
40%
11 Management of Unemployment
25 %
9%
41%
25%
12%
12 Development Programmes
44%
25%
49%
51%
23%
13 Quality and Independence of Civil Service
26%
25%
37%
22%
26%
14 Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions
34%
18%
68%
39%
19%
15 Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements
28%
26%
47%
24%
16%
16 Use of Technologies for Better Governance
27%
33%
58%
52%
29%
17 Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs
40%
31%
56%
41%
25%
18 Environment Sustainability
33%
20%
59%
32%
26%
19 Disaster Preparedness and Management
38%
32%
56%
43%
22%
20 Immunization of Children
85%
79%
90%
91%
77%
21 Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersEstablishment of Local Governments
29%
51%
56%
26%
28%
22 Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersDistribution of Resources to Provincial and Local

Governments
27%
27%
40%
24%
26%
23 Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective

Devolution of Power
28%
25%
40%
21%
26%
24 Access to Efficient Justice System
38%
32%
59%
39%
34%
25 National Security
53%
0%
0%
0%
0%
26 Foreign Policy Management
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27 Performance of Regulatory Bodies
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28 Merit Based Appointments-in Regulatory Bodies
28%
0%
0%
0%
0%
29 Management of Inflation
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
30 Water Resources Development and Management
38%
21%
57%
40%
29%
Tax Collection
43
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
31
Public Transport
0%
30%
57%
61%
27%
32
0%
20%
61%
44%
18%
33
Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and

Disposal)
0%
14%
52%
35%
23%
Public Opinion on Law and Order - 55% provide

Approval Rating in 2015
According to the survey, 38% gave a negative rating
while 55% gave a positive rating to the Government
regarding the issue of law and order. The overall
Approval Rating is therefore at 55%.
Public Opinion on Anti- Corruption - 27% provide

Survey results show that 27% people rated anticorruption efforts as positive while 58% as negative.
The Approval Rating in 2015 for actions taken against
corruption is therefore 27%.
Public Opinion on Poverty Alleviation - 28%

provide Approval Rating in 2015
According to the survey, 28% provided a positive
rating for the alleviation of poverty under the current
Government while 69% provided a negative rating.
The overall Approval Rating is therefore 28%.
Public Opinion on Investment Friendliness - 44%

43% of those questioned rated the investment
friendliness efforts as positive and 24% as negative.
Hence the Approval Rating meter stands out at 44% of
the Pakistani public.
Public Opinion on Education - 64% provide

According to the survey 64% respondents gave
positive ratings to education under the Federal
Government while 32% gave a negative rating.
Public Opinion on Tax Collection - 38% provide

The public's perception of the tax collection tactics of
the Government was not very favourable with 35% of
the people in disapproval. The Approval Rating in 2015
came out to be just 38% of the population.
Public Opinion on Healthcare - 54% provide

The public opinion on the effectiveness of Healthcare
system stands at an overall 54% positive Approval
Rating by the public. On the other hand, 41% of the
public gave a negative rating.
Public Opinion on Transparency - 30% provide
On the issue of transparency, 30% of the respondents
viewed Government organizations as positive while
34% rated it negatively. Hence the overall Approval
Rating in 2015 stood at a mere 30% of the Pakistani
population.
Public Opinion on Energy Production and
Management -30% provide Approval Rating in
2015
Survey results reveal that 30% of the respondents rated
energy production and management positively while a
majority; 65% rated it negatively. The Approval Rating
in 2015 stood at 30%.
44
Public Opinion on Utility Bills Collection - 56%

On the issue of utility bill collection, 56% rated it
positive while 33% were negative about it. The
Approval Rating for this category was therefore 56%.
Public Opinion on Management of Unemployment 25% provide Approval Rating in 2015
According to the survey 25% of the public gave
positive ratings to the management of unemployment
by the Federal Government while an outright majority
of 72% gave a negative rating. Thus, the Government's
overall Approval Rating in 2015 regarding the
handling of unemployment was a low 25%.
Public Opinion on Development Programmes 44% provide Approval Rating in 2015
Survey results show that 44% people rated
development programmes as positive while 32% of the
people rated them as negative. The Approval Rating
2015 for development programmes of the Federal
Government stood at 44% in 2015.
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Public Opinion on Quality & Independence of Civil

Service - 26% provide Approval Rating in 2015
Approximately, 26% of the public provided a positive
rating for the quality & independence of civil service
under the current Government while 32% provided a
negative rating. The Approval Rating is therefore 26%.
Merit-Based Recruitments and Promotions - 34%
The public opinion on merit-based recruitments and
promotions was below 50%, hence a majority of the
public was in disapproval of the system of merit-based
hiring by the Federal Government. Only 34% of the
public gave a positive rating while 54% gave a negative
rating.
Public Opinion on Clean, Efficient and Economic
Public Procurements - 28% provide Approval
Rating in 2015
positive ratings to the clean, efficient and economic
public procurements while 30% gave a negative rating.
Thus the Approval Rating in 2015 is 28%.
Public Opinion on Use of Technologies for Better
Governance - 48% provide Approval Rating in 2015
Approximately, 48% of the people rated the use of
technologies for better governance as positive while
only 21% rated it negatively. The overall Approval
Rating in 2015 was 48%.
Public Opinion on Management of Supply of
Agricultural Inputs - 40% provide Approval Rating
in 2015
The Approval Rating in 2015 was 40% of the public as
this proportion positively rated the management of
supply of agricultural inputs. Meanwhile, 45% people
rated it negatively.
Public Opinion on Environment Sustainability 33% provide Approval Rating in 2015
The public's opinion on the Government's efforts
towards environment sustainability was rated
positively at 33% (Approval Rating in 2015) and
negatively at 57%.
Public Opinion on Disaster Preparedness and
Management - 38% provide Approval Rating in
2015
positive ratings to disaster preparedness and
management under the Federal Government while 46%
gave a negative rating.
Public Opinion on Immunization of Children - 85%

Survey results show that a resounding majority of 85%
of the people rated immunization of children positively,
making it the highest ranked indicator of the Federal
Government. 12% of the people viewed the policies on
immunization negatively.
Public Opinion on Devolution of Powers to the
Lower Tiers: Establishment of Local Governments
- 29% provide Approval Rating in 2015
On the issue of devolution of powers to the lower tiers
and the establishment of Local Governments, the
overall Approval Rating in 2015 came out to be 29% of
the public. 19% of the population's views were negative
on the performance of the Government for this
indicator.
Lower Tiers: Distribution of Resources to
Provincial and Local Governments 27% provide
and the distribution of resources to Local
Governments, the overall Approval Rating in 2015
came out to be 27% of the public. 30% of the
respondent's views were negative on the performance
of the Government for this indicator.
Lower Tiers: Effective Devolution of Power - 28%
and the effective devolution of power, the overall
Approval Rating in 2015 came out to be 28% of the
public. 20% of the respondents' views were negative on
the performance of the Government for this indicator.
Public Opinion on Access to Efficient Justice
System - 38% provide Approval Rating in 2015
The public opinion on the access to efficient justice
system is less than 50% as only 38% of the public gave
it a positive rating. 27% of the public rated it negatively.
Public Opinion on National Security - 53% provide
positive ratings to national security while 23% gave a
negative rating. Thus the overall Approval Rating in
2015 was positive at 53%.
Public Opinion on Foreign Policy Management 44% provide Approval Rating in 2015
The public's opinion on the Government's foreign
policy management was rated positively at 44% and
45
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
negatively at 24% of the public. Hence, the overall

Approval Rating in 2015 came out to be 44%.
Public Opinion on Performance of Regulatory
Bodies - 30% provide Approval Rating in 2015
30% respondents rated the performance of regulatory
bodies positively and 22% rated it negatively.
Public Opinion on Merit Based Appointments in
Regulatory Bodies - 28% provide Approval Rating
in 2015
The public opinion on the performance of regulatory
bodies is negative with an Approval Rating of 28% in
2015. The public gave a positive rating of 28% while
24% gave a negative rating.
Public Opinion on Management of Inflation - 33%
towards management of inflation was rated positively
at 33% and negative at 64%. The overall Approval
Rating in 2015 was therefore 33% of the public
respondents.
Public Opinion on Water Resources Development
and Management - 38% provide Approval Rating in
2015
The public opinion on Water Resources Management
and Development is resoundingly negative since only
38% of the respondents gave it a positive rating in 2015.
Contrary to this; 54% of the public rated it negatively.
46
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 8: Law and Order (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the practical
measures by the Federal Government to maintain Peace, Stability and Order (such as raising and
maintaining an effective police force) please tell us if the Government's performance has been very good,
good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Very
Don't know
7%
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 10%
Bad, 14%
Good, 45%
Bad, 24%
Approval Rating 2015 = 55%

Source: Quality of Democracy and Governance Survey, 2015 (PILDAT)
Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015. Estimated
error margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence level
47
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 12: Law and Order (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the practical
measures by the Federal Government to maintain Peace, Stability and Order (such as raising and maintaining an
effective police force) please tell us if the Government's performance has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
Figures are row percentages
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
10%
45%
24%
14%
7%
1%
55%
Male
9%
47%
25%
14%
4%
0%
56%
Female
11%
43%
23%
14%
10%
1%
54%
Young (Under 30)
12%
46%
24%
13%
5%
0%
58%
Middle (30-50)
9%
45%
24%
13%
7%
1%
54%
Old (50+)
9%
43%
24%
15%
9%
1%
52%
Low
10%
43%
24%
14%
9%
1%
53%
Medium
11%
44%
26%
15%
5%
0%
55%
High
10%
51%
23%
12%
4%
0%
61%
Don't Know
12%
43%
17%
15%
13%
0%
55%
No Answer
3%
53%
23%
14%
6%
1%
56%
Balochistan
9%
34%
31%
24%
2%
1%
43%
KP
21%
51%
17%
7%
5%
0%
72%
Punjab
7%
43%
26%
16%
9%
1%
50%
Sindh
12%
52%
21%
8%
5%
1%
64%
Respondents from All

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Household Income-wise
Province-wise
48
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
13%
47%
26%
10%
3%
1%
60%
Rural
9%
44%
23%
15%
9%
1%
53%
PML-N
9%
45%
23%
14%
8%
0%
54%
PTI
11%
42%
28%
14%
5%
0%
53%
PPP
8%
45%
27%
12%
8%
1%
53%
All others
12%
47%
23%
13%
5%
1%
59%
Voting Intention-wise
Notes:
Age: Young: Under 30 years of age; Middle: Between 30 and 50 years of age; Old: Above 51 years of age
Income codes: Low: Up to Rs. 14000 (In 2013 this represented the lowest quintile). Medium: Rs. 14,001 to 20,000 (In 2013 this represented the 2nd
and 3rd Quintile). High: More than 20,000 (In 2013 this represented the 4th and 5th Quintiles)
Location:Urban is defined as location defined as town or city in the census, the total in Pakistan being 470 constituting 35% of the population; Rural is
defined as a population living in villages as in the latest census, approximating ~45,000, consisting 65% of the population.
Methodology: Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015.
Estimated error margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence level
1. PERCENTAGES have been rounded off to nearest whole number. As a result the total can sometimes be at slight variation from 100 (for example 99
or 101).
Approval Rating has been calculated by adding positive options: 'Very Good'+'Good
49
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 9: Poverty Alleviation (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the issue of
alleviating poverty, please tell us if the Federal Government's performance has been very good, good, bad or very
bad till now?
Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 23%
Very
Bad, 33%
Bad, 36%

50
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 13: Poverty Alleviation(All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the issue of
bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
23%
36%
33%
3%
1%
28%
Male
5%
23%
36%
34%
2%
1%
28%
Female
4%
23%
36%
32%
4%
1%
27%
Young (Under 30)
6%
23%
35%
33%
3%
1%
29%
Middle (30-50)
4%
24%
36%
33%
2%
1%
28%
Old (50+)
4%
19%
39%
33%
4%
1%
23%
Low
5%
23%
33%
34%
3%
1%
28%
Medium
4%
20%
37%
36%
2%
1%
24%
High
4%
27%
39%
29%
2%
0%
31%
Don't Know
4%
15%
45%
31%
5%
0%
19%
No Answer
3%
33%
33%
28%
3%
0%
36%
Balochistan
0%
17%
39%
42%
1%
1%
17%
KP
15%
29%
24%
28%
3%
0%
44%
Punjab
4%
25%
38%
30%
3%
1%
29%
Sindh
2%
18%
37%
39%
2%
1%
20%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
51
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
4%
21%
40%
33%
2%
1%
25%
Rural
5%
24%
34%
33%
3%
1%
29%
PML-N
5%
27%
37%
29%
2%
1%
32%
PTI
7%
18%
34%
40%
2%
0%
25%
PPP
3%
20%
37%
35%
4%
2%
23%
All others
5%
21%
35%
35%
3%
1%
26%
Methodology:Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12,
2015. Estimated error margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence level
or 101).
52
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 10: Education (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding improvement of
the education scenario (such as, literacy rate, children's enrolment and the overall improvement in the quality of
education, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Don't know, 4%
Very Bad, 11%
Very Good, 14%
Bad, 21%
Good, 50%

53
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 14: Education(All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding improvement of
the education scenario (such as, literacy rate, children's enrolment and the overall improvement in the quality of
education, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
50%
21%
11%
4%
0%
64%
Male
12%
46%
25%
13%
3%
1%
58%
Female
16%
54%
17%
9%
4%
0%
70%
Young (Under 30)
15%
49%
22%
11%
3%
0%
64%
Middle (30-50)
14%
49%
22%
12%
3%
1%
63%
Old (50+)
13%
52%
21%
9%
6%
0%
65%
12%
50%
21%
12%
5%
1%
62%
Medium
15%
50%
22%
11%
2%
0%
65%
High
19%
49%
24%
8%
1%
0%
68%
Don't Know
17%
48%
16%
14%
5%
0%
65%
No Answer
6%
57%
21%
12%
3%
1%
63%
Balochistan
6%
34%
27%
29%
5%
0%
40%
KP
24%
48%
16%
10%
2%
0%
72%
Punjab
16%
57%
16%
6%
4%
1%
73%
Sindh
6%
39%
35%
18%
2%
1%
45%
Urban
14%
50%
23%
10%
3%
0%
64%
Rural
14%
49%
20%
12%
4%
1%
63%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Low
Province-wise
Location-wise
54
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
14%
49%
22%
10%
5%
0%
75%
PTI
12%
41%
26%
17%
2%
1%
60%
PPP
8%
43%
27%
18%
3%
0%
57%
All others
10%
34%
35%
18%
4%
0%
54%
Notes:
or 101).
55
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 11: Healthcare(All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the improvement
of healthcare facilities (such as control of different diseases and their treatment, provision of inexpensive
medicines, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Don't know, 4%
Very Bad, 14%
Very
Good, 12%
Bad, 27%
Good, 42%

56
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 15: Healthcare(All Over Pakistan)

of healthcare facilities (such as control of different diseases and their treatment, provision of inexpensive
medicines, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
12%
42%
27%
14%
4%
0%
54%
Male
12%
37%
32%
16%
3%
0%
49%
Female
12%
47%
23%
12%
5%
1%
59%
Young (Under 30)
12%
43%
25%
16%
3%
0%
55%
Middle (30-50)
12%
43%
28%
13%
4%
0%
55%
Old (50+)
12%
39%
29%
14%
6%
1%
51%
Low
11%
42%
28%
15%
5%
1%
53%
Medium
12%
44%
27%
15%
3%
0%
56%
High
15%
42%
29%
12%
3%
0%
57%
Don't Know
16%
37%
22%
19%
5%
2%
53%
No Answer
4%
52%
29%
10%
4%
1%
56%
Balochistan
7%
27%
37%
26%
3%
0%
34%
KP
23%
46%
22%
6%
3%
0%
69%
Punjab
13%
47%
24%
11%
5%
1%
60%
Sindh
5%
35%
35%
23%
2%
0%
40%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
57
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
12%
41%
28%
15%
4%
0%
53%
Rural
12%
43%
27%
14%
4%
0%
55%
PML-N
14%
49%
22%
10%
5%
0%
63%
PTI
12%
41%
26%
17%
2%
1%
53%
PPP
8%
43%
27%
18%
3%
0%
51%
All others
10%
34%
35%
18%
4%
0%
44%
Notes:
or 101).
58
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 12:Transparency (All Over Pakistan)

of transparency and public access (such as making it mandatory for each Ministry and Government Institutions
to inform the public through placing its Annual Development Plan, Budget and Performance Report on its
website), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
No Answer, 2%
Very Good, 5%
Good, 25%
Don't
know, 34%
Bad, 23%
Very Bad, 11%

59
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 16: Transparency (All Over Pakistan)

of transparency and public access (such as making it mandatory for each Ministry and Government Institutions
to inform the public through placing its Annual Development Plan, Budget and Performance Report on its
website), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
25%
23%
11%
34%
2%
30%
Male
5%
24%
27%
14%
28%
2%
29%
Female
5%
25%
19%
9%
40%
3%
29%
Young (Under 30)
6%
27%
24%
11%
29%
2%
33%
Middle (30-50)
4%
25%
22%
12%
34%
2%
29%
Old (50+)
4%
19%
23%
11%
42%
2%
23%
Low
5%
22%
21%
13%
36%
3%
27%
Medium
5%
28%
25%
11%
31%
2%
33%
High
5%
30%
26%
11%
26%
2%
35%
Don't Know
5%
16%
16%
8%
53%
1%
21%
No Answer
1%
24%
24%
14%
36%
1%
25%
Balochistan
3%
23%
31%
14%
25%
4%
26%
KP
18%
32%
20%
12%
18%
0%
50%
Punjab
3%
24%
18%
10%
44%
2%
27%
Sindh
2%
24%
33%
14%
23%
4%
26%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
60
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
28%
27%
11%
27%
3%
33%
Rural
5%
23%
21%
12%
38%
2%
28%
PML-N
5%
26%
18%
9%
41%
1%
31%
PTI
7%
25%
26%
14%
26%
2%
32%
PPP
2%
24%
29%
12%
31%
3%
26%
All others
5%
23%
26%
14%
28%
4%
28%
Notes:
Methodology:Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015.
or 101).
61
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 13: Energy Production and Management (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the
improvements in the electricity situation in the country (such as adequate ), please tell us if the performance of
the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't know, 4%
No Answer, 1%
Very Good, 4%
Good, 26%
Very Bad, 36%
Bad, 29%

62
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 17: Energy Production and Management (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the
improvements in the electricity situation in the country (such as adequate) ), please tell us if the performance of
the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
26%
29%
36%
4%
1%
30%
Male
5%
30%
30%
32%
3%
1%
35%
Female
4%
22%
29%
40%
4%
1%
26%
Young (Under 30)
5%
24%
28%
39%
4%
0%
29%
Middle (30-50)
4%
26%
30%
35%
4%
1%
30%
Old (50+)
4%
26%
31%
35%
4%
1%
30%
Low
5%
23%
29%
37%
5%
1%
28%
Medium
4%
25%
30%
37%
3%
1%
29%
High
5%
31%
30%
31%
3%
0%
36%
Don't Know
3%
31%
27%
36%
3%
0%
34%
No Answer
1%
19%
35%
41%
3%
1%
20%
Balochistan
2%
20%
24%
50%
5%
0%
22%
KP
13%
19%
33%
32%
2%
0%
32%
Punjab
4%
33%
27%
34%
2%
1%
37%
Sindh
2%
16%
35%
39%
8%
2%
18%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
63
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
4%
26%
31%
35%
2%
1%
30%
Rural
5%
26%
28%
36%
4%
1%
30%
PML-N
5%
33%
27%
32%
2%
1%
38%
PTI
4%
20%
32%
41%
3%
0%
24%
PPP
4%
20%
29%
35%
10%
3%
24%
All others
4%
20%
32%
40%
4%
1%
24%
Notes:
1. PERCENTAGES have been rounded off to nearest whole number. As a result the total can sometimes be at slight variation from 100 (for
example 99 or 101).
64
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 14: Anti-Corruption (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding eradication or
minimisation of corruption and improving the performance of related institutions such as NAB, Federal
Ombudsman, etc., please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
No Answer, 1%
Don't
Very Good, 5%
know, 14%
Good, 22%
Very Bad, 27%
Bad, 31%

65
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 18: Anti-Corruption (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding eradication or
minimisation of corruption and improving the performance of related institutions such as NAB, Federal
Ombudsman, etc., please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
22%
31%
27%
14%
1%
27%
Male
5%
26%
30%
30%
9%
1%
31%
Female
5%
18%
32%
25%
19%
2%
23%
Young (Under 30)
5%
26%
30%
27%
11%
1%
31%
Middle (30-50)
5%
21%
31%
28%
15%
1%
26%
Old (50+)
4%
19%
33%
27%
17%
0%
23%
Low
5%
20%
30%
27%
17%
1%
25%
Medium
4%
25%
31%
30%
10%
1%
29%
High
6%
23%
33%
28%
9%
1%
29%
Don't Know
5%
12%
31%
24%
28%
0%
17%
No Answer
4%
36%
36%
17%
7%
0%
40%
Balochistan
1%
20%
31%
34%
12%
2%
21%
KP
11%
30%
32%
14%
13%
1%
41%
Punjab
3%
19%
31%
29%
16%
1%
22%
Sindh
6%
24%
29%
29%
10%
1%
30%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
66
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
7%
22%
32%
30%
9%
1%
29%
Rural
4%
22%
31%
26%
16%
1%
26%
PML-N
5%
23%
29%
28%
15%
1%
28%
PTI
5%
20%
32%
30%
12%
1%
25%
PPP
4%
25%
32%
26%
14%
0%
29%
All others
5%
21%
32%
27%
14%
2%
26%
Notes:
or 101).
67
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 15: Investment Friendliness (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding increase in local
and foreign investment, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good,
bad or very bad till now?
No Answer, 2% Very Good, 8%
Don't
know, 31%
Good, 36%
Very Bad, 8%
Bad, 16%

Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015. Estimated error margin: +2-5% at
95% confidence level
68
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 19: Investment Friendliness (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding increase in local
and foreign investment, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good,
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
8%
36%
16%
8%
31%
2%
44%
Male
10%
41%
20%
9%
19%
1%
51%
Female
5%
30%
12%
7%
44%
3%
35%
Young (Under 30)
9%
38%
16%
8%
27%
2%
47%
Middle (30-50)
7%
35%
16%
8%
32%
2%
42%
Old (50+)
7%
35%
14%
7%
35%
2%
42%
Low
8%
33%
14%
9%
35%
2%
41%
Medium
7%
36%
20%
8%
28%
2%
43%
High
10%
44%
16%
6%
23%
2%
54%
Don't Know
4%
39%
12%
8%
37%
1%
43%
No Answer
5%
28%
16%
11%
39%
1%
33%
Balochistan
7%
39%
19%
11%
23%
2%
46%
KP
17%
33%
17%
7%
26%
1%
50%
Punjab
7%
38%
11%
7%
35%
1%
45%
Sindh
5%
31%
25%
9%
27%
3%
36%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
69
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
9%
39%
12%
7%
33%
1%
48%
PTI
7%
28%
23%
11%
30%
1%
35%
PPP
4%
34%
19%
11%
31%
3%
38%
All others
8%
35%
19%
7%
29%
2%
43%
Notes:
or 101).
70
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 16: Tax Collection (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding improvement in
tax collection, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very
bad till now?
No Answer, 2%Very Good, 5%

Don't
know, 24%
Good, 33%
Very Bad, 12%
Bad, 23%

71
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 20: Tax Collection (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding improvement in
tax collection, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very
bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
33%
23%
12%
24%
2%
38%
Male
7%
37%
24%
15%
16%
1%
44%
Female
4%
29%
21%
10%
33%
3%
33%
Young (Under 30)
5%
36%
25%
11%
21%
2%
41%
Middle (30-50)
6%
34%
21%
13%
24%
2%
40%
Old (50+)
5%
26%
24%
12%
31%
3%
31%
Low
6%
33%
20%
12%
27%
3%
39%
Medium
5%
37%
26%
11%
19%
2%
42%
High
4%
34%
29%
14%
17%
1%
38%
Don't Know
4%
24%
17%
14%
40%
1%
28%
No Answer
3%
30%
19%
16%
29%
3%
33%
Balochistan
8%
33%
23%
18%
16%
2%
41%
KP
11%
33%
22%
12%
21%
1%
44%
Punjab
3%
31%
21%
13%
30%
2%
34%
Sindh
7%
38%
27%
9%
15%
3%
45%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
72
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
6%
33%
29%
14%
15%
2%
39%
Rural
5%
33%
20%
12%
28%
2%
38%
PML-N
5%
35%
19%
11%
28%
2%
40%
PTI
5%
29%
24%
20%
21%
1%
34%
PPP
5%
37%
25%
10%
21%
3%
42%
All others
7%
30%
26%
14%
21%
2%
37%
Notes:
or 101).
73
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 17: Utility Bills Collection (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding ensuring
collection of utility bills (such as electricity and gas bills), please tell us if the performance of the Federal
Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 10%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 8%
Very Bad, 11%
Good, 48%
Bad, 22%

74
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 21: Utility Bills Collection (All Over Pakistan)

collection of utility bills (such as electricity and gas bills), please tell us if the performance of the Federal
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
8%
48%
22%
11%
10%
1%
56%
Male
9%
52%
21%
11%
6%
1%
61%
Female
8%
43%
23%
10%
15%
2%
51%
Young (Under 30)
11%
47%
21%
11%
10%
0%
58%
Middle (30-50)
8%
49%
22%
11%
9%
1%
57%
Old (50+)
5%
46%
24%
11%
13%
2%
51%
Low
9%
47%
20%
10%
13%
1%
56%
Medium
10%
49%
21%
11%
7%
1%
59%
High
8%
50%
26%
9%
6%
0%
58%
Don't Know
5%
47%
26%
10%
12%
1%
52%
No Answer
4%
40%
25%
22%
8%
1%
44%
Balochistan
7%
36%
24%
18%
14%
1%
43%
KP
22%
36%
19%
12%
11%
1%
58%
Punjab
6%
55%
18%
10%
10%
1%
61%
Sindh
7%
42%
33%
9%
8%
1%
49%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
75
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
9%
52%
26%
8%
5%
1%
61%
Rural
8%
46%
20%
12%
13%
1%
54%
PML-N
8%
57%
16%
8%
10%
1%
65%
PTI
13%
39%
25%
13%
10%
0%
52%
PPP
5%
48%
27%
9%
11%
1%
53%
All others
9%
39%
27%
14%
10%
2%
48%
Notes:
or 101).
Approval Rating has been calculated by adding positive options: 'Very Good'+'good
76
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 18: Management of Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding reduction in
unemployment, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 20%
Very
Bad, 38%
Bad, 34%

77
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 22: Management of Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)

unemployment, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
20%
34%
38%
3%
0%
25%
Male
5%
19%
35%
39%
2%
0%
24%
Female
4%
20%
33%
37%
5%
0%
24%
Young (Under 30)
5%
19%
33%
39%
3%
0%
24%
Middle (30-50)
5%
20%
33%
39%
3%
1%
25%
Old (50+)
3%
18%
37%
37%
5%
1%
21%
Low
5%
19%
33%
39%
4%
1%
24%
Medium
4%
19%
32%
43%
2%
0%
23%
High
5%
20%
38%
33%
4%
0%
25%
Don't Know
4%
15%
40%
35%
5%
0%
19%
No Answer
1%
38%
27%
29%
4%
1%
39%
Balochistan
1%
10%
29%
59%
1%
1%
11%
KP
14%
25%
26%
31%
4%
0%
39%
Punjab
4%
22%
35%
35%
4%
0%
26%
Sindh
3%
15%
36%
43%
3%
1%
18%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
78
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
17%
41%
35%
3%
0%
22%
Rural
5%
21%
30%
40%
4%
1%
26%
PML-N
5%
23%
35%
33%
3%
0%
28%
PTI
4%
17%
35%
40%
3%
0%
21%
PPP
3%
17%
32%
43%
4%
2%
20%
All others
5%
17%
32%
43%
3%
0%
22%
Notes:
or 101)
79
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 19: Development Programmes (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the effectiveness
of development projects (such as cost effectiveness, improving quality and timely execution) of development
projects, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
Don't
know, 23%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 9%
Good, 35%
Very
Bad, 11%
Bad, 21%

Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015.
Estimated error margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence
80
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 23: Development Programmes (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the effectiveness
of development projects (such as cost effectiveness, improving quality and timely execution) of development
projects, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
35%
21%
11%
23%
1%
44%
Male
10%
34%
24%
13%
19%
1%
44%
Female
9%
35%
19%
9%
28%
2%
44%
Young (Under 30)
10%
34%
22%
11%
22%
1%
44%
Middle (30-50)
8%
36%
21%
11%
22%
1%
44%
Old (50+)
10%
31%
19%
10%
28%
1%
41%
Low
8%
29%
23%
13%
26%
2%
37%
Medium
8%
41%
21%
11%
19%
1%
49%
High
16%
43%
18%
8%
14%
1%
59%
Don't Know
8%
36%
11%
10%
36%
0%
44%
No Answer
2%
25%
31%
9%
33%
1%
27%
Balochistan
4%
21%
37%
21%
16%
1%
25%
KP
14%
35%
20%
12%
19%
1%
49%
Punjab
11%
39%
14%
8%
28%
1%
50%
Sindh
5%
29%
33%
14%
17%
2%
34%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
81
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
11%
40%
23%
9%
16%
2%
51%
Rural
8%
32%
21%
12%
27%
1%
40%
PML-N
13%
39%
15%
7%
24%
1%
52%
PTI
9%
33%
23%
14%
21%
0%
42%
PPP
3%
28%
31%
15%
22%
2%
31%
All others
6%
32%
25%
13%
22%
1%
38%
Notes:
or 101).
Approval Rating has been calculated by adding positive options: 'Very Good'+'Good'
82
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 20: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (All Over Pakistan)
Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding ensuring that
bureaucracy and its actions remain independent of political influences and encroachments, please tell us if the
performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 21%
Don't
know, 39%
Bad, 21%
Very
Bad, 11%

83
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 24: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (All Over Pakistan)
Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding ensuring that
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
21%
21%
11%
39%
3%
26%
Male
6%
24%
24%
13%
30%
2%
30%
Female
4%
18%
18%
9%
48%
4%
22%
Young (Under 30)
6%
24%
20%
12%
36%
2%
30%
Middle (30-50)
5%
21%
22%
11%
38%
4%
26%
Old (50+)
3%
18%
23%
10%
44%
2%
21%
Low
6%
21%
19%
12%
39%
4%
27%
Medium
4%
22%
24%
10%
37%
2%
26%
High
4%
25%
26%
9%
33%
2%
29%
Don't Know
4%
12%
19%
12%
52%
2%
16%
No Answer
1%
22%
15%
14%
43%
4%
23%
Balochistan
2%
18%
34%
14%
28%
5%
20%
KP
15%
24%
14%
15%
31%
1%
39%
Punjab
3%
19%
16%
10%
49%
3%
22%
Sindh
4%
26%
33%
11%
22%
4%
30%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
84
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
23%
31%
12%
28%
3%
28%
Rural
5%
20%
17%
11%
44%
3%
25%
PML-N
5%
24%
16%
9%
45%
2%
29%
PTI
3%
20%
23%
16%
35%
3%
23%
PPP
5%
24%
25%
9%
33%
5%
29%
All others
5%
17%
26%
14%
35%
3%
22%
Notes:
or 101).
85
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 21: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding merit-based
recruitment and promotions of Government employees, please tell us if the performance of the Federal
No
Don't
Answer,
1%
know, 11%
Very
Good, 8%
Good, 26%
Very
Bad, 24%
Bad, 30%

86
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 25: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding merit-based
recruitments and promotions of Government employees, please tell us if the performance of the Federal
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
8%
26%
30%
24%
11%
1%
34%
Male
8%
24%
33%
27%
8%
1%
32%
Female
8%
29%
27%
22%
14%
1%
37%
Young (Under 30)
8%
25%
31%
26%
10%
1%
33%
Middle (30-50)
8%
27%
29%
25%
11%
1%
35%
Old (50+)
8%
23%
33%
21%
14%
2%
31%
Low
9%
22%
29%
26%
13%
2%
31%
Medium
9%
32%
28%
22%
8%
1%
41%
High
6%
30%
34%
22%
7%
1%
36%
Don't Know
7%
21%
29%
26%
15%
2%
28%
No Answer
3%
27%
34%
24%
10%
1%
30%
Balochistan
1%
12%
45%
32%
8%
2%
13%
KP
26%
25%
26%
16%
7%
0%
51%
Punjab
7%
30%
28%
20%
15%
1%
37%
Sindh
4%
21%
32%
37%
5%
1%
25%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
87
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
7%
28%
32%
25%
6%
1%
35%
Rural
8%
25%
29%
24%
13%
1%
33%
PML-N
7%
33%
27%
20%
12%
1%
40%
PTI
11%
23%
28%
26%
10%
2%
34%
PPP
4%
25%
31%
30%
8%
2%
29%
All others
9%
18%
34%
28%
10%
1%
27%
Notes:
or 101).
88
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 22: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (All Over Pakistan)
transparency in public procurements by the Government (such as Government expenditure on any Government
related goods, services or construction, etc.) by the Federal Government, please tell us if the performance of the
Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 24%
Don't
know, 40%
Bad, 21%
Very
Bad, 9%

89
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 26: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (All Over Pakistan)
transparency in public procurements by the Government (such as Government expenditure on any Government
related goods, services or construction, etc.) by the Federal Government, please tell us if the performance of the
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
24%
21%
9%
40%
3%
28%
Male
4%
24%
24%
11%
35%
3%
28%
Female
3%
23%
18%
7%
45%
4%
26%
Young (Under 30)
4%
27%
21%
8%
37%
3%
31%
Middle (30-50)
4%
24%
21%
9%
39%
3%
28%
Old (50+)
3%
18%
21%
10%
46%
4%
21%
Low
4%
21%
22%
9%
40%
5%
25%
Medium
4%
27%
21%
10%
36%
3%
31%
High
3%
29%
24%
7%
36%
2%
32%
Don't Know
2%
13%
19%
11%
54%
1%
15%
No Answer
1%
28%
11%
9%
47%
4%
29%
Balochistan
2%
26%
26%
13%
27%
5%
28%
KP
12%
33%
18%
8%
29%
1%
45%
Punjab
2%
22%
16%
7%
50%
3%
24%
Sindh
3%
22%
33%
13%
25%
5%
25%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
90
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
4%
27%
23%
10%
34%
3%
31%
Rural
3%
22%
20%
9%
42%
4%
25%
PML-N
3%
25%
16%
7%
48%
3%
28%
PTI
4%
19%
26%
9%
39%
3%
23%
PPP
3%
24%
28%
9%
32%
3%
27%
All others
4%
23%
24%
12%
32%
5%
27%
Notes:
or 101).
91
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 23: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (All Over Pakistan)
Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding effective use of
technologies for better governance and to provide trainings to Government employees in the use of technologies,
please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 11%
Don't
know, 29%
Good, 37%
Very
Bad, 6%
Bad, 15%

92
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 27: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (All Over Pakistan)
Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding effective use of
technologies for better governance and to provide trainings to Government employees in the use of technologies,
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
11%
37%
15%
6%
29%
3%
48%
Male
11%
35%
19%
7%
26%
3%
46%
Female
10%
39%
11%
4%
33%
3%
49%
Young (Under 30)
12%
39%
15%
6%
26%
3%
51%
Middle (30-50)
10%
36%
15%
6%
30%
3%
46%
Old (50+)
10%
32%
16%
4%
35%
3%
42%
Low
10%
33%
14%
8%
31%
5%
43%
Medium
14%
42%
18%
3%
21%
1%
56%
High
11%
45%
17%
4%
23%
1%
56%
Don't Know
6%
29%
12%
4%
49%
1%
35%
No Answer
6%
27%
12%
7%
46%
3%
33%
Balochistan
5%
32%
24%
13%
24%
2%
37%
KP
24%
34%
15%
6%
21%
1%
58%
Punjab
10%
41%
7%
4%
34%
4%
51%
Sindh
6%
29%
30%
7%
26%
3%
35%

Over Pakistan Average
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
93
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
12%
46%
18%
3%
18%
3%
58%
Rural
10%
32%
14%
7%
35%
3%
42%
PML-N
11%
44%
8%
4%
30%
3%
55%
PTI
11%
35%
19%
5%
28%
2%
46%
PPP
6%
29%
23%
8%
32%
4%
35%
All others
12%
30%
20%
7%
28%
3%
42%
Notes:
or 101).
94
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 24: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding fair and efficient
procurement and distribution of agricultural inputs (such as fertilizers, pesticides, tractors and other
agricultural machinery), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good,
Don't
know, 14%
No
Very
Answer, 1% Good, 6%
Very
Bad, 16%
Good, 34%
Bad, 29%

95
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 28: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding fair and efficient
procurement and distribution of agricultural inputs (such as fertilizers, pesticides, tractors and other
agricultural machinery), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good,
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
34%
29%
16%
14%
1%
40%
Male
6%
31%
32%
20%
11%
1%
37%
Female
7%
38%
26%
11%
16%
1%
45%
Young (Under 30)
8%
35%
24%
18%
14%
1%
43%
Middle (30-50)
6%
36%
30%
15%
13%
1%
42%
Old (50+)
5%
30%
36%
13%
15%
1%
35%
Low
6%
34%
32%
15%
12%
1%
40%
Medium
8%
37%
24%
16%
15%
1%
45%
High
6%
37%
29%
13%
15%
0%
43%
Don't Know
4%
27%
37%
18%
13%
1%
31%
No Answer
5%
32%
21%
23%
19%
2%
37%
Balochistan
4%
30%
33%
26%
8%
0%
34%
KP
20%
36%
23%
11%
10%
1%
56%
Punjab
5%
36%
27%
15%
16%
1%
41%
Sindh
3%
31%
37%
15%
13%
2%
34%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
96
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
38%
28%
10%
19%
2%
43%
Rural
7%
33%
30%
18%
11%
1%
40%
PML-N
6%
38%
27%
15%
15%
1%
44%
PTI
5%
34%
31%
11%
17%
1%
39%
PPP
5%
34%
35%
18%
7%
1%
39%
All others
8%
31%
29%
17%
14%
1%
39%
Notes:
or 101).
97
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 25: Environmental Sustainability (All Over Pakistan)

environmental pollution (for instance keeping air and water from being polluted), please tell us if the
No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 10%
Very
Good, 5%
Very
Bad, 21%
Good, 28%
Bad, 36%

98
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 29: Environmental Sustainability (All Over Pakistan)

environmental pollution (for instance keeping air and water from being polluted), please tell us if the performance
of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
28%
36%
21%
10%
1%
33%
Male
5%
28%
36%
22%
8%
1%
33%
Female
6%
29%
35%
19%
11%
1%
35%
Young (Under 30)
6%
27%
36%
23%
7%
1%
33%
Middle (30-50)
5%
29%
35%
21%
9%
1%
34%
Old (50+)
5%
27%
38%
16%
14%
1%
32%
Low
5%
27%
34%
21%
12%
1%
32%
Medium
7%
30%
36%
20%
7%
1%
37%
High
4%
32%
42%
16%
5%
0%
36%
Don't Know
4%
23%
30%
22%
20%
1%
27%
No Answer
0%
33%
26%
34%
6%
2%
33%
Balochistan
1%
20%
40%
33%
6%
1%
21%
KP
21%
33%
21%
19%
5%
1%
54%
Punjab
3%
29%
35%
19%
13%
1%
32%
Sindh
3%
27%
42%
21%
6%
2%
30%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
99
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
28%
42%
17%
7%
1%
33%
Rural
5%
28%
33%
22%
11%
1%
33%
PML-N
4%
33%
33%
17%
12%
1%
37%
PTI
7%
27%
37%
20%
8%
1%
34%
PPP
3%
31%
32%
21%
11%
2%
34%
All others
6%
22%
40%
25%
6%
1%
28%
Notes:
or 101).
100
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 26: Disaster Preparedness and Management (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding managing
natural disasters, or managing circumstances that arise as a consequence of natural disasters, please tell us if the
Don't
know, 16%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 9%
Good, 29%
Very
Bad, 17%
Bad, 29%

101
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 30: Disaster Preparedness and Management (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding managing
natural disasters, or managing circumstances that arise as a consequence of natural disasters, please tell us if the
performance of the Federal Government been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
29%
29%
17%
16%
1%
38%
Male
9%
28%
29%
19%
15%
1%
37%
Female
9%
29%
29%
15%
17%
2%
38%
Young (Under 30)
9%
30%
29%
19%
13%
1%
39%
Middle (30-50)
9%
28%
29%
18%
16%
1%
37%
Old (50+)
10%
28%
28%
12%
21%
2%
38%
Low
9%
27%
25%
17%
20%
2%
36%
Medium
8%
31%
32%
17%
11%
1%
39%
High
11%
32%
35%
15%
8%
0%
43%
Don't Know
8%
26%
21%
13%
32%
1%
34%
No Answer
6%
25%
23%
34%
11%
2%
31%
Balochistan
8%
28%
32%
28%
5%
0%
36%
KP
22%
27%
26%
19%
7%
0%
49%
Punjab
8%
33%
26%
12%
19%
1%
41%
Sindh
4%
19%
35%
24%
17%
2%
23%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
102
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
8%
25%
35%
17%
14%
1%
33%
Rural
9%
31%
26%
17%
17%
1%
40%
PML-N
10%
36%
25%
11%
17%
1%
46%
PTI
12%
23%
30%
19%
14%
2%
35%
PPP
4%
27%
27%
20%
20%
2%
31%
All others
8%
22%
34%
22%
14%
1%
30%
Notes:
or 101).
103
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 27: Immunization of Children (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding vaccination to
control the spread of diseases, especially the anti-polio drive, please tell us if the performance of the Federal
Very
Bad, 4%
Don't
know, 2%
No
Answer, 1%
Bad, 8%
Very
Good, 38%
Good, 47%

104
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 31: Immunization of Children (All Over Pakistan)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding vaccination to
control the spread of diseases, especially the anti-polio drive, please tell us if the performance of the Federal
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
38%
47%
8%
4%
2%
1%
85%
Male
33%
49%
10%
6%
2%
0%
82%
Female
42%
45%
6%
3%
3%
1%
87%
Young (Under 30)
39%
45%
8%
5%
2%
1%
84%
Middle (30-50)
36%
49%
8%
4%
2%
1%
85%
Old (50+)
39%
47%
8%
3%
3%
1%
86%
Low
33%
47%
10%
6%
3%
1%
80%
Medium
40%
47%
7%
4%
1%
0%
87%
High
45%
48%
4%
2%
1%
0%
93%
Don't Know
42%
42%
5%
5%
4%
1%
84%
No Answer
27%
56%
10%
3%
3%
1%
83%
Balochistan
34%
46%
9%
9%
2%
1%
80%
KP
48%
40%
8%
3%
2%
0%
88%
Punjab
42%
47%
6%
3%
2%
1%
89%
Sindh
24%
54%
12%
7%
2%
0%
78%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
105
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
39%
52%
5%
3%
2%
0%
91%
Rural
37%
46%
9%
5%
3%
1%
83%
PML-N
47%
43%
6%
3%
2%
1%
90%
PTI
35%
48%
8%
6%
2%
1%
83%
PPP
19%
52%
16%
9%
3%
1%
71%
All others
34%
52%
7%
4%
2%
1%
86%
Notes:
or 101)
Approval Rating has been calculated by adding positive options: 'Very Good'+'Good'.
106
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 28: Devolution of Powers to The lower Tiers- Establishment of Local Governments (All
Over Pakistan)
Question: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us whether
the performance of the Federal Government in establishing Local and Regional Government in Federal Areas
(such as Islamabad, Cantonments and FATA) has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 6%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 49%
Bad, 13%
Very
Bad, 6%

107
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 32: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Establishment of Local Governments (All
Over Pakistan)
the performance of the Federal Government in establishing Local and Regional Government in Federal Areas
(such as Islamabad, Cantonments and FATA) has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
23%
13%
6%
49%
3%
29%
Male
6%
24%
17%
7%
44%
2%
30%
Female
7%
21%
9%
5%
55%
4%
28%
Young (Under 30)
7%
25%
14%
6%
45%
4%
32%
Middle (30-50)
6%
23%
13%
6%
48%
3%
29%
Old (50+)
5%
18%
12%
5%
56%
4%
23%
Low
5%
20%
14%
8%
49%
4%
25%
Medium
7%
25%
13%
4%
49%
3%
32%
High
8%
27%
14%
5%
45%
2%
35%
Don't Know
6%
19%
7%
4%
60%
5%
25%
No Answer
3%
25%
16%
5%
49%
3%
28%
Balochistan
12%
25%
12%
8%
38%
6%
37%
KP
15%
26%
17%
9%
31%
1%
41%
Punjab
4%
19%
10%
5%
60%
3%
23%
Sindh
5%
28%
19%
6%
37%
5%
33%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
108
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
6%
24%
17%
4%
45%
4%
31%
Rural
6%
22%
12%
7%
51%
3%
28%
PML-N
6%
21%
9%
4%
57%
3%
27%
PTI
7%
24%
18%
7%
42%
3%
31%
PPP
4%
31%
15%
6%
40%
4%
35%
All others
7%
22%
16%
8%
44%
4%
29%
Notes:
or 101).
109
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Federal Government's performance regarding fair distribution of financial resources among the Provinces has
been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 39%
Bad, 21%
Very
Bad, 9%

110
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
23%
21%
9%
39%
4%
27%
Male
5%
25%
23%
12%
33%
2%
30%
Female
4%
21%
19%
6%
45%
5%
25%
Young (Under 30)
5%
25%
21%
11%
35%
4%
30%
Middle (30-50)
4%
23%
21%
9%
39%
4%
27%
Old (50+)
4%
20%
21%
7%
45%
4%
24%
Low
4%
20%
23%
11%
38%
4%
24%
Medium
6%
22%
20%
8%
40%
5%
28%
High
5%
28%
22%
7%
36%
2%
33%
Don't Know
4%
23%
13%
9%
48%
4%
27%
No Answer
3%
25%
15%
12%
43%
3%
28%
Balochistan
3%
20%
32%
15%
26%
4%
23%
KP
14%
17%
22%
13%
33%
1%
31%
Punjab
3%
22%
17%
6%
48%
4%
25%
Sindh
2%
29%
27%
12%
26%
4%
31%

Over Pakistan Average
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
111
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
28%
25%
6%
33%
4%
33%
Rural
4%
20%
19%
11%
42%
4%
24%
PML-N
4%
23%
17%
6%
46%
4%
27%
PTI
5%
21%
23%
10%
38%
3%
26%
PPP
3%
32%
21%
13%
30%
3%
35%
All others
6%
19%
26%
12%
35%
3%
25%
Notes:
or 101).
112
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 30: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (All Over
Pakistan)
the Federal Government's performance in making Provincial Governments autonomous after the enactment of
18th amendment has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 6%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 47%
Bad, 14%
Very
Bad, 6%

113
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 34: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective Devolution of Power (All Over
Pakistan)
the Federal Government's performance in making Provincial Governments autonomous after the enactment of
18th amendment has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
23%
14%
6%
47%
6%
28%
Male
5%
27%
19%
7%
38%
4%
32%
Female
5%
18%
9%
4%
56%
7%
23%
Young (Under 30)
7%
24%
15%
5%
43%
6%
31%
Middle (30-50)
4%
24%
13%
6%
47%
6%
28%
Old (50+)
5%
18%
14%
4%
55%
5%
23%
Low
4%
21%
14%
7%
48%
6%
25%
Medium
7%
23%
13%
4%
45%
8%
30%
High
6%
28%
16%
4%
43%
4%
34%
Don't Know
4%
19%
9%
5%
60%
2%
23%
No Answer
3%
27%
13%
7%
43%
8%
30%
Balochistan
6%
26%
18%
5%
39%
5%
32%
KP
16%
28%
14%
7%
30%
5%
44%
Punjab
3%
19%
10%
4%
59%
5%
22%
Sindh
4%
28%
22%
8%
32%
7%
32%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
114
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
6%
26%
17%
4%
41%
6%
32%
Rural
5%
21%
13%
6%
50%
6%
26%
PML-N
4%
21%
11%
3%
56%
5%
25%
PTI
7%
20%
16%
10%
44%
4%
27%
PPP
3%
26%
14%
8%
41%
8%
29%
All others
8%
24%
17%
7%
39%
6%
32%
Notes:
or 101).
Approval Rating has been calculated by adding positive options: 'Very Good'+'good
115
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 31: Access to Efficient Justice System (All Over Pakistan)

Question: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us that with
regards to making the judicial system effective (such as induction and adequate training of sufficient state
prosecutors, use of new technology for investigation purposes, prompt appointment of judges against vacant
vacancies), has the Federal
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 7%
Don't
know, 32%
Good, 31%
Very
Bad, 9%
Bad, 18%

116
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 35: Access to Efficient Justice System (All Over Pakistan)

regards to making the judicial system effective (such as induction and adequate training of sufficient state
prosecutors, use of new technology for investigation purposes, prompt appointment of judges against vacant
vacancies), has the Federal Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
31%
18%
9%
32%
3%
38%
Male
8%
33%
21%
10%
27%
2%
41%
Female
7%
30%
15%
8%
37%
4%
37%
Young (Under 30)
9%
34%
17%
9%
29%
3%
43%
Middle (30-50)
7%
31%
18%
9%
32%
3%
38%
Old (50+)
5%
30%
17%
8%
36%
5%
35%
Low
8%
29%
17%
9%
33%
4%
37%
Medium
6%
37%
19%
8%
28%
2%
43%
High
8%
36%
19%
8%
27%
2%
44%
Don't Know
5%
20%
17%
12%
43%
3%
25%
No Answer
4%
27%
16%
7%
40%
6%
31%
Balochistan
4%
29%
30%
13%
22%
3%
33%
KP
23%
35%
9%
6%
26%
1%
58%
Punjab
5%
32%
15%
10%
36%
3%
37%
Sindh
6%
28%
26%
7%
29%
5%
34%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
117
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
8%
35%
20%
8%
26%
3%
43%
Rural
7%
29%
17%
9%
35%
3%
36%
PML-N
7%
34%
15%
8%
34%
2%
41%
PTI
6%
33%
20%
10%
28%
3%
39%
PPP
6%
29%
25%
7%
30%
5%
35%
All others
9%
28%
18%
11%
31%
3%
37%
Notes:
or 101).
118
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 32: National Security (All Over Pakistan)

regards to effective execution of national defence and security policies, has the Federal Government's
performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 23%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 9%
Very
Bad, 7%
Good, 44%
Bad, 16%

Source: Quality of Democracy and Governance Survey, 2015 (PILDAT
119
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 36:National Security (All Over Pakistan)

regards to effective execution of national defence and security policies, has the Federal Government's
performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
44%
16%
7%
23%
2%
53%
Male
11%
50%
16%
7%
15%
1%
61%
Female
7%
38%
15%
6%
31%
3%
45%
Young (Under 30)
11%
43%
14%
7%
23%
2%
54%
Middle (30-50)
8%
46%
16%
7%
22%
2%
54%
Old (50+)
9%
41%
18%
4%
26%
2%
50%
Low
10%
39%
16%
9%
25%
3%
49%
Medium
9%
45%
19%
6%
20%
2%
54%
High
8%
59%
12%
3%
16%
1%
67%
Don't Know
8%
36%
12%
6%
37%
1%
44%
No Answer
4%
38%
21%
6%
30%
2%
43%
Balochistan
8%
40%
19%
10%
20%
4%
48%
KP
21%
43%
14%
5%
16%
1%
64%
Punjab
7%
45%
14%
6%
27%
2%
52%
Sindh
7%
45%
21%
8%
18%
2%
52%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
120
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
10%
48%
18%
5%
18%
1%
58%
Rural
9%
42%
15%
7%
25%
2%
51%
PML-N
9%
48%
13%
5%
24%
2%
57%
PTI
9%
43%
24%
7%
18%
0%
52%
PPP
4%
44%
16%
8%
27%
1%
48%
All others
11%
40%
18%
8%
21%
2%
51%
Notes:
or 101).
121
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 33: Foreign Policy Management (All Over Pakistan)

the Federal Government's performance regarding the foreign policy has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 7%
Don't
know, 30%
Good, 37%
Very
Bad, 6%
Bad, 18%

122
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 37: Foreign Policy Management (All Over Pakistan)

the Federal Government's performance regarding the foreign policy has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
37%
18%
6%
30%
3%
44%
Male
9%
42%
20%
7%
20%
3%
51%
Female
5%
32%
15%
5%
40%
2%
37%
Young (Under 30)
9%
37%
17%
6%
29%
2%
46%
Middle (30-50)
7%
39%
18%
6%
27%
3%
46%
Old (50+)
6%
32%
18%
6%
37%
2%
38%
Low
8%
31%
18%
7%
33%
4%
39%
Medium
7%
44%
20%
5%
23%
2%
51%
High
8%
50%
15%
4%
22%
1%
58%
Don't Know
4%
27%
14%
7%
47%
2%
31%
No Answer
2%
32%
17%
9%
39%
1%
34%
Balochistan
4%
38%
20%
6%
25%
7%
42%
KP
17%
40%
19%
6%
19%
1%
57%
Punjab
6%
37%
13%
6%
35%
3%
43%
Sindh
5%
36%
26%
7%
24%
1%
41%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
123
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
9%
41%
22%
5%
22%
2%
50%
Rural
6%
35%
16%
7%
33%
3%
41%
PML-N
8%
39%
12%
5%
33%
2%
47%
PTI
7%
36%
23%
8%
23%
2%
43%
PPP
5%
35%
20%
6%
33%
2%
40%
All others
7%
36%
22%
7%
25%
3%
43%
Notes:
or 101).
124
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 34: Performance of Regulatory Bodies (All Over Pakistan)

regards to making regulatory bodies independent and effective (such as PEMRA, OGRA, NEPRA, State Bank,
etc.) has the Federal Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 26%
Don't
know, 45%
Bad, 16%
Very
Bad, 6%

125
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 38: Performance of Regulatory Bodies (All Over Pakistan)

Question:Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us that with
regards to making regulatory bodies independent and effective (such as PEMRA, OGRA, NEPRA, State Bank,
etc.) has the Federal Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
26%
16%
6%
45%
3%
30%
Male
4%
28%
20%
7%
38%
2%
32%
Female
4%
24%
12%
4%
52%
5%
28%
Young (Under 30)
5%
28%
17%
5%
42%
3%
33%
Middle (30-50)
5%
26%
15%
6%
45%
3%
31%
Old (50+)
2%
21%
16%
5%
52%
4%
23%
Low
5%
23%
15%
6%
47%
4%
28%
Medium
4%
32%
17%
5%
39%
4%
36%
High
5%
28%
19%
4%
42%
2%
33%
Don't Know
1%
20%
10%
6%
59%
3%
21%
No Answer
3%
23%
18%
8%
47%
1%
26%
Balochistan
4%
23%
24%
6%
40%
5%
27%
KP
12%
33%
20%
2%
31%
2%
45%
Punjab
3%
21%
11%
5%
57%
4%
24%
Sindh
4%
34%
23%
9%
27%
3%
38%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
126
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
4%
28%
19%
7%
39%
4%
32%
Rural
4%
25%
15%
5%
48%
3%
29%
PML-N
3%
25%
12%
3%
53%
4%
28%
PTI
5%
21%
18%
8%
45%
3%
26%
PPP
4%
34%
18%
6%
35%
3%
38%
All others
5%
25%
21%
8%
39%
3%
30%
Notes:
or 101).
127
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 35: Merit-Based Appointments in Regulatory Bodies (All Over Pakistan)

regards to ensuring timely appointment of Heads and various employees of regulatory bodies (such as PEMRA,
OGRA, NEPRA, State Bank, etc.) based on merit, has the Federal Government's performance been very good,
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 24%
Don't
know, 44%
Bad, 17%
Very
Bad, 7%

128
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 39: Merit-Based Appointments in Regulatory Bodies (All Over Pakistan)

OGRA, NEPRA, State Bank, etc.) based on merit, has the Federal Government's performance been very good,
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
24%
17%
7%
44%
4%
28%
Male
4%
25%
21%
8%
38%
3%
29%
Female
4%
22%
13%
6%
50%
5%
26%
Young (Under 30)
5%
26%
18%
7%
40%
4%
31%
Middle (30-50)
5%
23%
17%
7%
43%
4%
28%
Old (50+)
2%
20%
16%
6%
51%
4%
22%
Low
4%
21%
15%
8%
46%
5%
25%
Medium
4%
29%
20%
4%
39%
4%
33%
High
5%
25%
20%
6%
41%
3%
30%
Don't Know
2%
16%
16%
10%
55%
2%
18%
No Answer
1%
21%
19%
10%
47%
1%
22%
Balochistan
3%
19%
27%
8%
38%
6%
22%
KP
11%
31%
18%
7%
31%
3%
42%
Punjab
4%
20%
11%
6%
55%
5%
24%
Sindh
3%
30%
28%
11%
27%
3%
33%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
129
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
4%
26%
21%
8%
38%
4%
30%
Rural
4%
22%
16%
7%
47%
4%
26%
PML-N
4%
23%
12%
4%
53%
4%
27%
PTI
4%
20%
17%
9%
45%
5%
24%
PPP
4%
26%
27%
7%
33%
3%
30%
All others
5%
24%
20%
10%
36%
5%
29%
Notes:
or 101).
130
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 36: Management of Inflation (All Over Pakistan)

Question: In your view of the Federal Government's performance over the past two years, with regards to
controlling inflation, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad
or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 8%
Good, 25%
Very
Bad, 39%
Bad, 25%

131
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 40: Management of Inflation (All Over Pakistan)

Question: In your view of the Federal Government's performance over the past two years, with regards to
controlling inflation, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad
or very bad till now?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
8%
25%
25%
39%
3%
1%
33%
Male
9%
27%
25%
36%
2%
1%
36%
Female
7%
22%
25%
42%
4%
1%
29%
Young (Under 30)
9%
24%
25%
39%
2%
1%
33%
Middle (30-50)
8%
26%
24%
39%
3%
1%
33%
Old (50+)
8%
23%
27%
39%
3%
0%
31%
Low
9%
22%
23%
42%
4%
1%
31%
Medium
7%
26%
25%
39%
2%
1%
33%
High
10%
28%
28%
33%
1%
0%
38%
Don't Know
6%
25%
32%
34%
3%
1%
31%
No Answer
3%
24%
20%
45%
8%
1%
27%
Balochistan
7%
17%
21%
51%
2%
3%
24%
KP
13%
18%
22%
42%
4%
0%
31%
Punjab
9%
29%
25%
33%
3%
1%
38%
Sindh
3%
20%
28%
46%
2%
1%
23%

Over Pakistan
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
132
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
6%
26%
27%
38%
2%
1%
32%
Rural
9%
24%
23%
40%
3%
1%
33%
PML-N
11%
31%
24%
31%
2%
0%
42%
PTI
6%
16%
27%
49%
2%
1%
22%
PPP
6%
19%
27%
42%
4%
2%
25%
All others
5%
21%
24%
45%
3%
1%
26%
Notes:
or 101).
133
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 37: Water Resources Development and Management (All Over Pakistan)
Question:In your view of the Federal Government's performance over the past two years, with regards to the
improvement and management of water resources, please tell us if the Federal Government's performance has
Don't
know, 7%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 6%
Very Bad, 21%

Good, 32%
Bad, 33%

134
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 41: Water Resources Development and Management (All Over Pakistan)
Question: In your view of the Federal Government's performance over the past two years, with regards to the
improvement and management of water resources, please tell us if the Federal Government's performance has
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
32%
33%
21%
7%
1%
38%
Male
6%
34%
32%
22%
6%
0%
40%
Female
6%
30%
35%
19%
9%
1%
36%
Young (Under 30)
6%
34%
32%
21%
6%
0%
40%
Middle (30-50)
6%
32%
34%
20%
7%
1%
38%
Old (50+)
6%
29%
35%
21%
10%
0%
35%
Low
7%
29%
31%
22%
9%
1%
37%
Medium
5%
36%
33%
19%
6%
1%
41%
High
6%
34%
39%
16%
5%
0%
40%
Don't Know
3%
31%
36%
21%
8%
0%
34%
No Answer
6%
27%
32%
27%
7%
1%
33%
Balochistan
4%
19%
37%
37%
3%
1%
23%
KP
14%
41%
24%
17%
5%
0%
55%
Punjab
6%
36%
32%
16%
10%
1%
42%
Sindh
4%
24%
42%
27%
4%
1%
28%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
135
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
6%
32%
37%
20%
4%
0%
38%
Rural
6%
32%
32%
21%
9%
1%
38%
PML-N
6%
38%
31%
16%
9%
0%
44%
PTI
7%
27%
35%
25%
5%
1%
34%
PPP
6%
30%
38%
18%
8%
1%
36%
All others
6%
26%
35%
26%
6%
1%
32%
Notes:
or 101).
136
Quality of Governance Balochistan Government

Views of Respondents from All Over Balochistan
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 42: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance- Balochistan
No.
Indicator
Law and Order
44%
46%
Poverty Alleviation
13%
19%
Education
45%
41%
Healthcare
35%
42%
Transparency
24%
39%
18%
40%
Anti-Corruption
19%
36%
32%
32%
Tax Collection
33%
35%
10
39%
45%
11
9%
12
25%
45%
13
25%
36%
14
Merit- Based Recruitment and

Promotions
18%
24%
15
26%
36%
16

Procurements
Inputs
33%
30%
31%
41%
18
20%
44%
19
32%
48%
20
79%
50%
Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersEstablishment of Local Governments

Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersDistribution of Resources to Provincial
and Local Governments
51%
57%
27%
N/A
17
21
22
19%
139
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
23
Devolution of Powers to the Lower TiersEffective Devolution of Power
25%
N/A
24
32%
31%
25
Public Transport
30%
60%
26
20%
52%
Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste

Collection and Disposal)
Management
14%
38%
21%
39%
27
28

According to the survey, 44% gave a positive rating
while 54% gave a negative rating to the Provincial
Government regarding the issue of law and order. The
overall Approval Rating is therefore at 44%.
13% provided a positive rating to the alleviation of
poverty under the current Government while a large
majority of 84% of the Balochi people provided a
negative rating. The overall Approval Rating is
therefore only 13%.
According to the survey 45% of the Balochi public
gave positive ratings to education under the Provincial
Public Opinion on Health Care - 35% provide
The public opinion on the effectiveness of health care
system stands at an overall 35%of the public in
approval. On the other hand, a majority 63% of the
Rating in 2015 stood at a mere 24% of the Balochi
respondents.
2015
18% of the respondents rated energy production and
140
management positively while a majority 79% of the

Balochi public rated it negatively. The Approval Rating
in 2015 stood at just 18%.
Survey results show that only 19% people rated anticorruption efforts as positive while 68% viewed them
as negative. The Approval Rating in 2015 for actions
taken against corruption is therefore 19%.
the public of Balochistan.
the Provincial Government was not very favourable
with 47% of the people in disapproval. The Approval
Rating in 2015 came out to be just 33% of the sample
population.
On the issue of utility bills collection, 39% rated it
Approval Rating for this category was therefore 39%.
According to the survey 9% of the public gave positive
ratings to the management of unemployment by the
Provincial Government while an outright majority of
88% gave a negative rating. Thus, the Government's
overall Approval Rating in 2015 regarding the handling
of unemployment was the lowest at just 9% of the
population of Balochistan
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015

people rated them as negative. The Approval Rating for
development programmes of the Provincial
Government therefore stands at 25% in 2015.

2015
According to the survey 32% of the surveyed public
gave positive ratings to the disaster preparedness &
management of the Provincial Government while 63%

25% of the public provided a positive rating for the
quality & independence of civil service under the
current Government while 44% provided a negative
rating. The Approval Rating is therefore 25% in 2015.

Survey results show that a resounding majority 79% of
the respondentsrated immunization of children
positively, making it the highest ranked indicator of the
ProvincialGovernment. 21% of the people viewed the
policies on immunization negatively.
Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions - 18%

public was in disapproval of the system of merit-based
hiring by the Provincial Government. Only 18% of the
respondents gave a positive rating while 72% gave a
negative rating.
Rating in 2015
33% of the people rated the use of technologies for
better governance as positive while 44% rated it
negatively. The overall Approval Rating in 2015 was
33% of the Balochi public.
in 2015
The Approval Rating in 2015 was 31% of the
respondentsas this proportion positively rated the
management of supply of agricultural inputs.
Meanwhile, 63% people rated it negatively.
positively at a mere 20% and negatively at 75% of the
population of the province.

and the establishment of local governments, the overall
and the distribution of resources to local governments,
the overall Approval Rating in 2015 came out to be
27% of the public. 43% of the respondents'views were
negative on the performance of the Government for this
indicator.
Balochi public. 31% of the respondents'views were
indicator.
system is less than fifty percent as only 32% of the
surveyed public gave it a positive rating. 41% of the
public rated it negatively.
141
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Public Opinion on Public Transport - 30% provide

The Government received positive ratings from 30% of
the respondents for its performance regarding public
transport, while 67% of the respondents gave negative
ratings. The Approval Rating in 2015 stands at 30% of
the people of the Province.
Public Opinion on Access to Safe Drinking Water20% provide Approval Rating in 2015
Regarding the Government's performance on supply of
access to safe drinking water, 20% of the respondents
gave a positive rating while the majority of the people
were of a negative opinion (78%). The Approval Rating
in 2015 is therefore very low at just 20% of the
population of the Province.
Public Opinion on Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid
Waste Collection and Disposal) - 14% provide
Only 14% of the respondents gave positive ratings
while a resounding 80% gave negative ratings to the
Governments for its performance on sanitation.
and Management - 21% provide Approval Rating in
2015
According to the survey, 21% of the respondents gave
positive ratings to the Provincial Government for its
performance on development and management of
irrigation water. On the other hand, 73% gave negative
ratings. Hence, the Approval Rating for this indicator
was rather low in 2015; at a mere 21% of the
population.
142
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 38: Law and Order (Balochistan)

Question: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years.
Regarding the practical measures by the Provincial Government to maintain Peace, Stability and Order (such as
maintaining and raising an effective police force) please tell us if the Provincial Government's performance has
No
Don't
Answer, 1%
know, 1%
Very
Good, 7%
Very
Bad, 27%
Good, 37%
Bad, 27%

Sample Size: 285; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 June 12, 2015. Estimated
143
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 43: Law and Order (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
37%
27%
27%
1%
1%
44%
Male
8%
38%
25%
26%
2%
1%
46%
Female
6%
35%
30%
28%
1%
1%
41%
Young (Under 30)
3%
36%
28%
33%
0%
0%
39%
Middle (30-50)
10%
38%
25%
23%
2%
1%
48%
Old (50+)
11%
28%
33%
17%
6%
6%
39%
Low
5%
39%
29%
25%
1%
2%
44%
Medium
6%
30%
31%
32%
0%
1%
36%
High
11%
42%
22%
22%
2%
0%
53%
Don't Know
10%
0%
20%
50%
20%
0%
10%
No Answer
17%
67%
17%
0%
0%
0%
84%
Urban
8%
24%
36%
32%
0%
0%
32%
Rural
7%
38%
27%
26%
2%
1%
45%
4%
52%
24%
20%
0%
0%
56%
25%
50%
25%
0%
0%
25%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
PML-N
PTI
0%
PPP
8%
75%
17%
0%
0%
0%
83%
All others
8%
31%
28%
30%
2%
1%
39%
Notes:
Income codes: Low: Up to Rs. 14000 (In 2014 this represented the lowest quintile). Medium: Rs. 14,001 to 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 2nd and 3rd
Quintile). High: More than 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 4th and 5th Quintiles)
Location:Urban is defined as location defined as town or city in the census, the total in Pakistan being 470 constituting 35% of the population; Rural is defined
as a population living in villages as in the latest census, approximating ~45,000, consisting 65% of the population.
1. PERCENTAGES have been rounded off to nearest whole number. As a result the total can sometimes be at slight variation from 100 (for example 99 or 101).
144
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 39: Poverty Alleviation (Balochistan)

Regarding the issue of alleviating poverty, please tell us if the Provincial Government's performance has been
very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 2%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 11%
Very
Bad, 43%
Bad, 41%

145
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 44: Poverty Alleviation (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
11%
41%
43%
2%
1%
13%
Male
2%
9%
48%
38%
3%
1%
11%
Female
2%
14%
35%
49%
1%
0%
16%
Young (Under 30)
2%
11%
33%
53%
1%
1%
13%
Middle (30-50)
2%
12%
46%
37%
2%
1%
14%
Old (50+)
6%
6%
61%
22%
6%
0%
12%
Low
2%
11%
42%
42%
3%
1%
13%
Medium
2%
8%
34%
55%
0%
10%
High
2%
13%
56%
29%
0%
1%
0%
Don't Know
0%
10%
30%
50%
10%
0%
10%
No Answer
8%
33%
42%
17%
0%
0%
41%
Urban
0%
16%
44%
40%
0%
0%
16%
Rural
2%
11%
41%
44%
2%
1%
13%
PML-N
2%
14%
44%
40%
0%
0%
16%
PTI
0%
0%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
PPP
0%
0%
58%
42%
0%
0%
0%
All others
2%
12%
40%
43%
2%
1%
14%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
15%
Location-wise
Notes:
146
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 40: Education (Balochistan)

Regarding improvement of the education scenario (for example, literacy rate, children's enrolment, and the
overall improvement in the quality of education, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial
Don't
know, 2%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 9%
Very
Bad, 28%
Good, 36%
Bad, 23%

147
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 45: Education (Balochistan)

Question:The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years.
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
36%
23%
28%
2%
1%
45%
Male
9%
37%
25%
25%
3%
1%
46%
Female
9%
35%
22%
31%
1%
1%
44%
Young (Under 30)
8%
33%
25%
32%
3%
1%
41%
Middle (30-50)
10%
40%
23%
25%
1%
1%
50%
Old (50+)
17%
33%
17%
22%
6%
6%
50%
Low
7%
32%
21%
34%
3%
3%
39%
Medium
6%
39%
29%
26%
0%
0%
45%
55%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
High
11%
44%
22%
22%
0%
0%
Don't Know
30%
0%
20%
20%
20%
10%
30%
No Answer
25%
58%
0%
17%
0%
0%
83%
Urban
8%
36%
28%
28%
0%
0%
44%
Rural
9%
36%
23%
28%
2%
2%
45%
PML-N
14%
50%
14%
20%
2%
0%
64%
PTI
25%
17%
25%
33%
0%
0%
42%
PPP
8%
67%
17%
8%
0%
0%
75%
All others
7%
32%
26%
31%
2%
39%
Location-wise
2%
Notes:
148
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 41:Healthcare (Balochistan)

Regarding the improvement of healthcare facilities (such as control of different diseases and their treatment,
provision of inexpensive medicines, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 9%
Very Bad, 31%

Good, 26%
Bad, 32%

149
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 46: Healthcare (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
26%
32%
31%
3%
0%
35%
Male
9%
27%
35%
30%
0%
1%
36%
Female
9%
25%
29%
32%
5%
0%
34%
Young (Under 30)
7%
22%
34%
33%
3%
1%
29%
Middle (30-50)
10%
29%
31%
29%
2%
0%
39%
Old (50+)
17%
22%
28%
33%
0%
39%
Low
5%
28%
33%
29%
4%
0%
33%
Medium
7%
22%
29%
39%
2%
1%
29%
High
18%
20%
44%
18%
0%
0%
38%
Don't Know
0%
30%
0%
70%
0%
0%
30%
No Answer
33%
50%
17%
0%
0%
0%
83%
Urban
4%
40%
28%
28%
0%
0%
44%
Rural
9%
24%
32%
31%
3%
0%
33%
PML-N
10%
25%
41%
25%
0%
0%
35%
PTI
8%
8%
58%
25%
0%
0%
16%
PPP
0%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
33%
9%
27%
26%
34%
3%
1%
36%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
0%
Location-wise
All others
Notes:
150
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 42: Transparency (Balochistan)

Regarding the improvement of transparency and public access (such as making it mandatory for each Ministry
and Government Institutions to inform the public through placing its Annual Development Plan, Budget and
Performance Report on its website), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very
good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 6%
Very
Good, 4%
Don't
know, 20%
Good, 20%
Very
Bad, 18%
Bad, 32%

151
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 47: Transparency (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
20%
32%
18%
20%
6%
24%
Male
4%
19%
33%
21%
18%
6%
23%
Female
3%
22%
31%
15%
22%
7%
25%
Young (Under 30)
2%
24%
32%
21%
18%
4%
26%
Middle (30-50)
4%
20%
34%
14%
20%
8%
24%
Old (50+)
11%
0%
22%
28%
33%
6%
11%
Low
2%
17%
31%
16%
22%
13%
19%
Medium
5%
18%
32%
19%
25%
2%
23%
High
4%
29%
33%
22%
9%
2%
33%
Don't Know
0%
10%
40%
30%
20%
0%
10%
No Answer
8%
58%
33%
0%
0%
0%
66%
Urban
4%
24%
40%
24%
8%
0%
28%
Rural
4%
20%
31%
17%
21%
7%
24%
PML-N
6%
28%
34%
24%
6%
2%
34%
PTI
8%
8%
42%
33%
8%
0%
16%
PPP
0%
17%
50%
8%
25%
0%
17%
All others
3%
19%
30%
16%
24%
8%
22%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
152
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 43: Energy Production and Management (Balochistan)

Regarding increasing the electricity production in the country, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 13%
Very
Bad, 51%
Bad, 28%

153
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 48: Energy Production and Management (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
13%
28%
51%
3%
18%
Male
4%
10%
35%
48%
4%
14%
Female
6%
15%
22%
54%
3%
21%
Young (Under 30)
3%
14%
24%
56%
3%
17%
Middle (30-50)
8%
11%
31%
48%
3%
19%
Old (50+)
0%
17%
33%
44%
6%
17%
Low
8%
7%
26%
56%
3%
15%
Medium
1%
16%
28%
54%
2%
17%
High
7%
16%
29%
47%
2%
23%
Don't Know
0%
10%
30%
40%
20%
10%
No Answer
8%
42%
42%
8%
0%
50%
Urban
0%
32%
16%
52%
0%
32%
Rural
5%
11%
29%
51%
4%
16%
PML-N
6%
16%
20%
56%
2%
22%
PTI
0%
17%
42%
42%
0%
17%
PPP
0%
25%
33%
33%
8%
25%
All others
5%
11%
29%
52%
3%
16%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
154
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 44: Anti-Corruption (Balochistan)

Regarding the eradication or minimization of corruption, and improving the performance of related institutions
such as the Provincial Department for Anti-Corruption, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial
Don't
know, 10%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 16%
Very
Bad, 35%
Bad, 33%

155
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 49: Anti-Corruption (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
16%
33%
35%
10%
2%
19%
Male
5%
22%
28%
36%
7%
2%
27%
Female
1%
10%
38%
35%
13%
2%
11%
Young (Under 30)
1%
12%
38%
42%
7%
2%
13%
Middle (30-50)
5%
18%
28%
34%
13%
3%
23%
34%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
6%
28%
44%
11%
11%
0%
Low
1%
18%
42%
30%
8%
3%
19%
Medium
2%
12%
24%
44%
14%
3%
14%
High
9%
18%
31%
36%
7%
0%
27%
Don't Know
0%
10%
10%
50%
30%
0%
10%
No Answer
17%
25%
58%
0%
0%
0%
42%
Urban
0%
12%
36%
48%
4%
0%
12%
Rural
4%
17%
33%
34%
11%
2%
21%
PML-N
0%
20%
26%
50%
4%
0%
20%
PTI
0%
8%
58%
25%
8%
0%
8%
PPP
0%
8%
67%
17%
8%
0%
8%
All others
4%
16%
31%
34%
12%
3%
20%
Old (50+)
Location-wise
Notes:
156
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 45: Investment Friendliness (Balochistan)

Regarding increase in local and foreign investment in the province, please tell us if the performance of the
Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 4%
Don't
know, 22%
Good, 28%
Very
Bad, 16%
Bad, 30%

157
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 50: Investment Friendliness (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
28%
30%
16%
22%
1%
32%
Male
4%
26%
34%
18%
17%
1%
30%
Female
3%
31%
25%
13%
27%
1%
34%
Young (Under 30)
3%
28%
31%
15%
23%
1%
31%
Middle (30-50)
3%
31%
27%
17%
21%
1%
34%
Old (50+)
6%
17%
39%
11%
28%
0%
23%
Low
3%
23%
32%
15%
25%
2%
26%
Medium
2%
40%
21%
16%
22%
0%
42%
High
4%
27%
40%
16%
13%
0%
31%
Don't Know
0%
0%
40%
20%
40%
0%
0%
No Answer
25%
25%
33%
8%
8%
0%
50%
Urban
0%
28%
44%
16%
12%
0%
28%
Rural
4%
29%
28%
16%
23%
1%
33%
PML-N
2%
34%
38%
14%
10%
2%
36%
PTI
0%
42%
50%
0%
8%
0%
42%
PPP
0%
33%
17%
25%
25%
0%
33%
All others
4%
26%
27%
17%
26%
1%
30%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
158
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 46: Tax Collection (Balochistan)

Regarding improvement in tax collection, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has
Don't
know, 17%
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 10%
Good, 24%
Very
Bad, 20%
Bad, 27%

159
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 51: Tax Collection (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
10%
24%
27%
20%
17%
4%
34%
Male
9%
21%
31%
21%
14%
4%
31%
Female
10%
26%
22%
19%
19%
4%
36%
Young (Under 30)
10%
26%
28%
23%
10%
3%
36%
Middle (30-50)
10%
23%
26%
18%
19%
4%
33%
Old (50+)
6%
11%
22%
17%
39%
6%
17%
Low
12%
20%
23%
23%
17%
5%
32%
Medium
6%
29%
30%
17%
16%
3%
35%
High
2%
22%
40%
20%
13%
2%
24%
Don't Know
40%
0%
20%
10%
30%
0%
40%
No Answer
17%
50%
0%
17%
17%
0%
67%
Urban
12%
16%
40%
32%
0%
0%
28%
Rural
9%
25%
25%
19%
18%
4%
34%
PML-N
10%
34%
24%
24%
6%
2%
44%
PTI
8%
17%
33%
33%
0%
8%
25%
PPP
0%
17%
33%
33%
8%
8%
17%
10%
22%
27%
17%
20%
4%
32%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
All others
Notes:
160
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 47: Utility Bills Collection (Balochistan)

Regarding ensuring collection of utility bills (such as water and sewerage bills), please tell us if the performance
of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 14%
No
Very
Answer, 1% Good, 7%
Very
Bad, 18%
Good, 32%
Bad, 29%

161
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 52: Utility Bills Collection (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
32%
29%
18%
14%
1%
39%
Male
6%
27%
31%
21%
16%
1%
33%
Female
8%
37%
27%
15%
12%
1%
45%
Young (Under 30)
8%
34%
26%
19%
11%
2%
42%
Middle (30-50)
6%
32%
31%
18%
13%
1%
38%
22%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
0%
22%
28%
11%
39%
0%
Low
4%
25%
36%
18%
16%
2%
29%
Medium
6%
37%
26%
18%
13%
0%
43%
High
9%
31%
29%
22%
7%
2%
40%
Don't Know
30%
20%
10%
10%
30%
0%
50%
No Answer
8%
83%
8%
0%
0%
0%
91%
Urban
8%
44%
20%
28%
0%
0%
52%
Rural
7%
31%
30%
17%
15%
1%
38%
PML-N
12%
44%
24%
18%
2%
0%
56%
PTI
0%
25%
67%
8%
0%
0%
25%
PPP
0%
25%
33%
25%
17%
0%
25%
All others
6%
30%
28%
18%
17%
1%
36%
Old (50+)
Location-wise
Notes:
162
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 48: Management of Unemployment (Balochistan)

Regarding reduction in unemployment, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been
Don't
know, 2%
Very
Good, 0%
Good, 9%
Bad, 30%
Very
Bad, 58%

163
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 53: Management of Unemployment (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
0%
9%
30%
58%
2%
0%
9%
Male
0%
9%
27%
63%
1%
1%
9%
Female
1%
10%
33%
54%
4%
0%
11%
Young (Under 30)
1%
8%
27%
62%
2%
1%
9%
Middle (30-50)
0%
10%
32%
57%
2%
0%
10%
Old (50+)
0%
11%
39%
44%
6%
0%
11%
Low
1%
3%
33%
60%
3%
0%
4%
Medium
0%
7%
32%
59%
1%
1%
7%
High
0%
22%
22%
56%
0%
0%
22%
Don't Know
0%
10%
0%
80%
10%
0%
10%
No Answer
0%
42%
33%
25%
0%
0%
42%
Urban
0%
16%
20%
64%
0%
0%
16%
Rural
0%
9%
31%
58%
2%
0%
9%
PML-N
0%
16%
28%
56%
0%
0%
16%
PTI
0%
0%
42%
58%
0%
0%
0%
PPP
0%
8%
42%
50%
0%
0%
8%
All others
1%
8%
29%
59%
3%
1%
9%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
164
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 49: Development Programmes (Balochistan)

Regarding the effectiveness of development projects (such as cost effectiveness, improving quality and timely
execution) of development projects, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very
Don't
know, 10%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 22%
Very
Bad, 28%
Bad, 37%

165
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 54: Development Programmes (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
22%
37%
28%
10%
0%
25%
Male
2%
25%
39%
27%
6%
1%
27%
Female
4%
18%
34%
29%
14%
0%
22%
Young (Under 30)
2%
21%
40%
29%
8%
0%
23%
Middle (30-50)
4%
21%
34%
27%
13%
1%
25%
Old (50+)
6%
28%
33%
33%
0%
0%
34%
Low
2%
20%
37%
31%
9%
1%
22%
Medium
1%
17%
41%
30%
12%
0%
18%
High
11%
24%
33%
24%
7%
0%
35%
Don't Know
0%
20%
40%
30%
10%
0%
20%
No Answer
8%
58%
17%
0%
17%
0%
66%
Urban
0%
16%
52%
24%
8%
0%
16%
Rural
4%
22%
35%
29%
10%
0%
26%
PML-N
4%
18%
42%
34%
2%
0%
22%
PTI
8%
33%
50%
8%
0%
0%
41%
PPP
0%
17%
58%
17%
8%
0%
17%
All others
3%
22%
33%
29%
13%
1%
25%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
166
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 50: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Balochistan)

Regarding ensuring that bureaucracy and its actions remain independent of political influences and
encroachments, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 24%
Don't
know, 27%
Bad, 26%
Very
Bad, 18%

167
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 55: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Balochistan)

very bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
0%
24%
26%
18%
27%
4%
25%
Male
1%
26%
29%
19%
24%
1%
27%
Female
1%
21%
24%
16%
30%
8%
22%
Young (Under 30)
2%
19%
32%
20%
24%
4%
21%
Middle (30-50)
1%
28%
24%
16%
26%
5%
29%
Old (50+)
0%
22%
11%
11%
56%
0%
22%
Low
0%
20%
26%
20%
30%
5%
20%
Medium
0%
21%
31%
17%
29%
3%
21%
High
7%
31%
29%
13%
18%
2%
38%
Don't Know
0%
10%
20%
20%
50%
0%
10%
No Answer
0%
67%
0%
17%
0%
17%
67%
Urban
0%
20%
56%
12%
12%
0%
20%
Rural
1%
24%
24%
18%
29%
5%
25%
PML-N
0%
36%
30%
20%
10%
4%
36%
PTI
0%
8%
50%
33%
0%
8%
8%
PPP
0%
33%
25%
17%
25%
0%
33%
All others
1%
21%
24%
16%
33%
4%
22%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
168
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 51: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Balochistan)

Regarding merit-based recruitments and promotions of Government employees, please tell us if the
performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 7%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 15%
Very
Bad, 38%
Bad, 34%

169
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 56: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
15%
34%
38%
7%
2%
18%
Male
5%
14%
33%
40%
5%
4%
19%
Female
1%
17%
36%
37%
9%
0%
18%
Young (Under 30)
2%
11%
36%
43%
8%
2%
13%
Middle (30-50)
3%
19%
34%
36%
8%
1%
22%
Old (50+)
11%
22%
22%
33%
0%
11%
33%
Low
2%
13%
44%
31%
8%
3%
15%
Medium
2%
11%
32%
45%
8%
1%
13%
High
9%
27%
20%
42%
2%
0%
36%
Don't Know
0%
10%
10%
60%
10%
10%
10%
No Answer
8%
33%
42%
17%
0%
0%
41%
Urban
0%
12%
20%
68%
0%
0%
12%
Rural
4%
16%
36%
35%
8%
2%
20%
PML-N
4%
28%
22%
46%
0%
0%
32%
PTI
0%
25%
75%
0%
0%
0%
PPP
0%
25%
42%
17%
17%
0%
25%
All others
3%
13%
37%
36%
9%
2%
16%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
170
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 52: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Balochistan)

Regarding ensuring transparency in public procurements by the Government (such as Government expenditure
on any Government related goods, services or construction, etc.) by the Provincial Government, please tell us if
the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 5%
Very
Good, 3%
Don't
know, 24%
Good, 23%
Bad, 25%
Very
Bad, 20%

171
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 57: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
23%
25%
20%
24%
5%
26%
Male
3%
18%
27%
24%
26%
3%
21%
Female
2%
29%
24%
16%
23%
7%
31%
Young (Under 30)
3%
23%
29%
23%
19%
4%
26%
Middle (30-50)
2%
25%
21%
19%
30%
4%
27%
Old (50+)
6%
6%
39%
17%
17%
17%
12%
Low
1%
20%
26%
16%
31%
7%
21%
Medium
2%
26%
24%
25%
20%
4%
28%
High
4%
27%
27%
22%
18%
2%
31%
Don't Know
0%
20%
30%
20%
30%
0%
20%
No Answer
17%
33%
25%
0%
17%
8%
50%
Urban
0%
24%
40%
16%
20%
0%
24%
Rural
3%
23%
24%
20%
25%
5%
26%
PML-N
6%
32%
18%
30%
14%
0%
38%
PTI
0%
0%
50%
33%
8%
8%
0%
PPP
0%
25%
42%
8%
25%
0%
25%
All others
2%
22%
25%
18%
28%
6%
24%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
172
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 53: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Balochistan)

Regarding effective use of technologies for better governance and to provide trainings to Government employees
in the use of technologies, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good,
Don't
know, 22%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 6%
Good, 27%
Very
Bad, 17%
Bad, 27%

173
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 58: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
27%
27%
17%
22%
2%
33%
Male
5%
18%
33%
22%
18%
4%
23%
Female
6%
35%
22%
11%
26%
0%
41%
Young (Under 30)
5%
28%
30%
17%
20%
1%
33%
Middle (30-50)
6%
26%
26%
16%
23%
2%
32%
Old (50+)
6%
28%
22%
11%
28%
6%
34%
Low
3%
27%
23%
21%
22%
3%
30%
Medium
3%
29%
32%
11%
25%
0%
32%
High
11%
24%
31%
16%
16%
2%
35%
Don't Know
0%
10%
30%
10%
50%
0%
10%
No Answer
33%
33%
25%
8%
0%
0%
66%
Urban
0%
44%
44%
4%
8%
0%
44%
Rural
6%
25%
26%
18%
24%
2%
31%
PML-N
4%
40%
38%
6%
12%
0%
44%
PTI
0%
42%
33%
8%
17%
0%
42%
PPP
8%
25%
17%
33%
17%
0%
33%
All others
6%
23%
25%
19%
25%
2%
29%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
174
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 54: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Balochistan)

Regarding fair and efficient procurement and distribution of agricultural inputs (such as fertilizers, pesticides,
tractors and other agricultural machinery), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has
Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 26%
Very
Bad, 31%
Bad, 32%

175
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 59: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
26%
32%
31%
5%
3%
31%
Male
4%
16%
38%
36%
4%
2%
20%
Female
6%
35%
26%
25%
6%
4%
41%
Young (Under 30)
3%
23%
28%
37%
6%
4%
26%
Middle (30-50)
6%
28%
34%
27%
3%
2%
34%
Old (50+)
6%
28%
39%
17%
11%
0%
34%
Low
3%
27%
36%
26%
3%
5%
30%
Medium
4%
31%
23%
34%
8%
0%
35%
High
9%
9%
42%
36%
0%
4%
18%
Don't Know
0%
20%
10%
50%
20%
0%
20%
No Answer
17%
42%
33%
0%
8%
0%
59%
Urban
0%
36%
20%
36%
4%
4%
36%
Rural
5%
25%
33%
30%
5%
3%
30%
PML-N
6%
30%
38%
20%
6%
0%
36%
PTI
0%
17%
17%
25%
17%
25%
17%
PPP
8%
17%
50%
17%
0%
8%
25%
All others
4%
26%
30%
34%
4%
2%
30%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
176
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 55: Environmental Sustainability (Balochistan)

Regarding reduction in environmental pollution (for instance keeping air and water from being polluted) please
tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Don't
Answer, 1%
know, 5%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 16%
Very
Bad, 39%
Bad, 36%

177
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 60: Environmental Sustainability (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
16%
36%
39%
5%
1%
20%
Male
5%
11%
38%
39%
6%
1%
16%
Female
2%
19%
35%
40%
4%
0%
21%
Young (Under 30)
1%
16%
31%
48%
4%
1%
17%
Middle (30-50)
6%
15%
41%
33%
5%
1%
21%
Old (50+)
6%
17%
39%
33%
6%
0%
23%
Low
0%
9%
46%
40%
4%
1%
9%
Medium
6%
20%
30%
41%
2%
1%
26%
High
7%
20%
22%
44%
7%
0%
27%
Don't Know
0%
10%
40%
20%
30%
0%
10%
No Answer
8%
33%
42%
17%
0%
0%
41%
Urban
0%
16%
36%
48%
0%
0%
16%
Rural
4%
15%
36%
39%
5%
1%
19%
PML-N
4%
14%
37%
41%
4%
0%
18%
PTI
0%
17%
17%
67%
0%
0%
17%
PPP
0%
33%
50%
17%
0%
0%
33%
All others
4%
15%
37%
39%
5%
1%
19%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
178
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 56: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Balochistan)

Regarding managing natural disasters, or managing circumstances that arise as a consequence of natural
disasters, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very
bad till now?
Don't
know, 4%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 10%
Very
Bad, 31%
Good, 22%
Bad, 32%

179
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 61: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Balochistan)

bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
10%
22%
32%
31%
4%
1%
32%
Male
9%
26%
28%
33%
4%
1%
35%
Female
11%
19%
36%
29%
4%
1%
30%
Young (Under 30)
11%
13%
33%
38%
5%
0%
24%
Middle (30-50)
8%
30%
30%
27%
3%
1%
38%
Old (50+)
22%
22%
39%
17%
0%
0%
44%
Low
12%
22%
30%
31%
4%
2%
34%
Medium
8%
17%
38%
33%
4%
0%
25%
High
13%
33%
20%
33%
0%
0%
46%
Don't Know
0%
20%
20%
40%
20%
0%
20%
No Answer
8%
33%
50%
8%
0%
0%
41%
Urban
0%
24%
28%
48%
0%
0%
24%
Rural
11%
22%
32%
30%
4%
1%
33%
PML-N
16%
20%
28%
34%
2%
0%
36%
PTI
17%
17%
17%
50%
0%
0%
34%
PPP
25%
33%
17%
17%
8%
0%
58%
All others
8%
22%
35%
30%
4%
1%
30%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
180
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 57: Immunization of Children (Balochistan)

Regarding vaccination to control the spread of diseases, especially the anti-polio drive, please tell us if the
performance of the Provincial Government hasbeen very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Bad, 10%
Don't
know, 1%
Bad, 11%
Very
Good, 38%
Good, 41%

181
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 62: Immunization of Children (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
38%
41%
11%
10%
1%
0%
79%
Male
36%
38%
14%
11%
1%
1%
74%
Female
39%
44%
7%
9%
1%
0%
83%
Young (Under 30)
33%
45%
10%
12%
0%
0%
78%
Middle (30-50)
38%
40%
11%
10%
1%
1%
78%
Old (50+)
61%
28%
11%
0%
0%
0%
89%
Low
39%
42%
9%
9%
1%
1%
81%
Medium
41%
38%
9%
10%
1%
0%
79%
High
24%
53%
16%
7%
0%
0%
77%
Don't Know
20%
20%
20%
40%
0%
0%
40%
No Answer
58%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Urban
8%
56%
16%
20%
0%
0%
64%
Rural
40%
40%
10%
9%
1%
0%
80%
PML-N
44%
34%
10%
12%
0%
0%
78%
PTI
25%
58%
17%
0%
0%
0%
83%
PPP
8%
92%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
All others
38%
39%
11%
10%
1%
1%
77%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
182
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 58: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Establishment of Local Governments
(Balochistan)
Question:Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
please tell us whether the performance of Provincial Government regarding conducting local body elections and
establishment of Local Governments has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 14%
Don't
know, 21%
Very
Bad, 5%
Good, 37%
Bad, 20%

183
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 63:Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Establishment of Local Governments

(Balochistan)
Question: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
37%
20%
5%
21%
4%
51%
Male
16%
38%
23%
4%
16%
4%
54%
Female
11%
35%
17%
6%
27%
4%
46%
Young (Under 30)
10%
34%
19%
8%
25%
4%
44%
Middle (30-50)
16%
39%
19%
3%
19%
4%
55%
Old (50+)
17%
33%
28%
0%
22%
0%
50%
Low
10%
32%
27%
5%
21%
4%
42%
Medium
10%
44%
13%
4%
25%
3%
54%
High
31%
36%
7%
9%
18%
0%
67%
Don't Know
10%
20%
10%
0%
40%
20%
30%
No Answer
17%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Urban
8%
60%
16%
4%
4%
8%
68%
Rural
14%
34%
20%
5%
23%
4%
48%
PML-N
28%
40%
18%
8%
6%
0%
68%
PTI
17%
42%
8%
8%
25%
0%
59%
PPP
33%
42%
8%
0%
17%
0%
75%
All others
9%
35%
21%
4%
25%
5%
44%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
184
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 59: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Distribution of Resources to Provincial
please tell us whether the Provincial Government's performance regarding fair distribution of financial
resources among districts and various Local Governments has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 4
Very
Good, 2%
%
Good, 25%
Don't
know, 27%
Very
Bad, 16%
Bad, 27%
Approval Rating 2015 =27%

185
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
25%
27%
16%
27%
4%
27%
Male
2%
26%
32%
18%
20%
3%
28%
Female
1%
24%
22%
13%
34%
6%
25%
Young (Under 30)
0%
18%
32%
19%
27%
5%
18%
Middle (30-50)
2%
28%
24%
14%
29%
3%
30%
Old (50+)
11%
39%
17%
11%
17%
6%
50%
Low
2%
24%
31%
15%
27%
2%
26%
Medium
2%
28%
20%
12%
31%
7%
30%
High
0%
25%
32%
21%
21%
2%
25%
Don't Know
0%
0%
40%
10%
40%
10%
0%
No Answer
8%
25%
25%
25%
17%
0%
33%
Urban
0%
32%
36%
8%
24%
0%
32%
Rural
2%
24%
26%
16%
27%
5%
26%
PML-N
0%
26%
32%
18%
18%
6%
26%
PTI
0%
17%
42%
33%
8%
0%
17%
PPP
0%
17%
25%
25%
33%
0%
17%
All others
2%
25%
25%
13%
30%
4%
27%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
186
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 60: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers- Effective Devolution of Power
(Balochistan)
please tell us whether the Provincial Government's performance in making use of the autonomy devolved to it
after the enactment of 18th amendment has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 5%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 40%
Bad, 25%
Very
Bad, 6%
Approval Rating 2015 =25%

187
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
(Balochistan)
Very
Good
1
2%
Good
Bad
3
25%
Very
Bad
4
6%
Don't
Know
5
40%
No
Answer
6
5%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2
23%
Male
3%
24%
27%
7%
36%
3%
27%
Female
1%
22%
23%
5%
43%
6%
23%
Young (Under 30)
1%
24%
24%
5%
43%
3%
25%
Middle (30-50)
3%
23%
27%
8%
34%
6%
26%
Old (50+)
6%
11%
17%
0%
67%
0%
17%
Low
2%
21%
26%
7%
40%
4%
23%
Medium
2%
19%
22%
3%
51%
4%
21%
High
2%
34%
32%
9%
18%
5%
36%
Don't Know
0%
0%
40%
10%
50%
0%
0%
No Answer
8%
50%
17%
0%
17%
8%
58%
Urban
0%
56%
16%
4%
24%
0%
56%
Rural
2%
19%
26%
6%
41%
5%
21%
PML-N
0%
31%
27%
6%
33%
4%
31%
PTI
0%
58%
17%
0%
17%
8%
58%
PPP
0%
50%
17%
0%
33%
0%
50%
All others
3%
17%
26%
7%
43%
5%
20%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
25%
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
188
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 61: Access to Efficient Justice System (Balochistan)

please tell us that with regards to making the judicial system effective (such as induction and adequate training of
sufficient state prosecutors, use of new technology for investigation purposes, prompt appointment of judges
against vacant vacancies), has the Provincial Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
No
Answer, 5%
Very
Good, 5%
Don't
know, 23%
Good, 27%
Very
Bad, 14%
Bad, 27%

189
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 66: Access to Efficient Justice System (Balochistan)

till now?
Very
Good
Bad
Very
Don't
No
Approval Rating
Good
Bad
Know Answer
2015
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 = (1+2)
5%
27%
27%
14%
23%
5%
32%
Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Male
3%
16%
38%
19%
21%
4%
19%
Female
8%
38%
16%
9%
24%
6%
46%
Young (Under 30)
8%
28%
26%
16%
20%
3%
36%
Middle (30-50)
3%
27%
28%
12%
23%
6%
30%
Old (50+)
6%
22%
22%
11%
39%
0%
28%
Low
4%
27%
19%
16%
25%
9%
31%
Medium
5%
27%
30%
13%
24%
1%
32%
High
2%
24%
47%
11%
16%
0%
26%
Don't Know
0%
20%
30%
10%
40%
0%
20%
No Answer
33%
42%
8%
0%
8%
8%
75%
Urban
0%
40%
44%
0%
16%
0%
40%
Rural
6%
25%
25%
15%
24%
5%
31%
PML-N
6%
44%
38%
4%
8%
0%
50%
PTI
8%
17%
50%
17%
8%
0%
25%
PPP
0%
42%
25%
17%
8%
8%
42%
All others
5%
22%
23%
16%
28%
6%
27%
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
190
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 62: Public Transport (Balochistan)

Question: In your opinion of the Provincial Government's performance during the past two years, with regards
to improvement of public transport (such as busses, etc.), please tell us whether the performance of the Provincial
Government of your province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 4%
Very
Bad, 32%
Good, 26%
Bad, 35%

191
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 67: Public Transport (Balochistan)

to improvement of public transport (such as busses, etc.), please tell us whether the performance of the
Provincial Government of your province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
26%
35%
32%
3%
0%
30%
Male
4%
16%
39%
35%
5%
0%
20%
Female
4%
35%
31%
29%
1%
1%
39%
Young (Under 30)
3%
24%
41%
30%
2%
0%
28%
Middle (30-50)
5%
28%
30%
32%
4%
1%
33%
Old (50+)
6%
17%
33%
39%
6%
0%
22%
Low
3%
24%
33%
37%
4%
0%
27%
Medium
2%
32%
38%
26%
1%
1%
34%
High
7%
18%
38%
36%
2%
0%
25%
Don't Know
10%
20%
30%
30%
10%
0%
30%
No Answer
25%
33%
25%
17%
0%
0%
58%
Urban
0%
44%
40%
16%
0%
0%
44%
Rural
5%
24%
34%
33%
4%
0%
29%
PML-N
8%
28%
48%
16%
0%
0%
36%
PTI
8%
33%
25%
33%
0%
0%
41%
PPP
0%
17%
50%
25%
8%
0%
17%
All others
3%
25%
31%
36%
4%
1%
28%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
192
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 63: Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply (Balochistan)

Question:In your opinion of the Provincial Government's performance during the past two years, with regards
to the provision of clean drinking water, please tell us whether the performance of the Provincial Government of
your province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 2%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 17%
Very
Bad, 44%
Bad, 34%

193
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 68: Access to Safe Drinking Water (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
17%
34%
44%
2%
1%
20%
Male
3%
13%
38%
41%
4%
1%
16%
Female
2%
20%
31%
46%
0%
1%
22%
Young (Under 30)
3%
16%
33%
48%
0%
1%
19%
Middle (30-50)
3%
15%
38%
41%
2%
1%
18%
Old (50+)
0%
39%
17%
33%
11%
0%
39%
Low
1%
17%
37%
43%
2%
1%
18%
Medium
2%
18%
26%
51%
1%
2%
20%
High
7%
9%
44%
40%
0%
0%
16%
Don't Know
0%
20%
20%
50%
10%
0%
20%
No Answer
8%
33%
50%
8%
0%
0%
41%
Urban
4%
28%
32%
36%
0%
0%
32%
Rural
2%
16%
35%
45%
2%
1%
18%
PML-N
0%
20%
40%
40%
0%
0%
20%
PTI
0%
42%
25%
33%
0%
0%
42%
PPP
0%
33%
42%
17%
8%
0%
33%
All others
3%
13%
33%
47%
2%
1%
16%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
194
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 64: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Balochistan)
to improvement in the sanitation system (such as sewerage and solid waste collection), please tell us if the
performance of the Provincial Government of your province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Very
Don't
know, 5% Good, 1%
Good, 13%
Very
Bad, 49%
Bad, 31%

195
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 69: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Balochistan)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
1%
13%
31%
49%
5%
0%
14%
Male
1%
10%
31%
47%
10%
1%
11%
Female
1%
17%
31%
51%
1%
0%
18%
Young (Under 30)
0%
16%
28%
54%
2%
0%
16%
Middle (30-50)
2%
11%
35%
46%
6%
0%
13%
Old (50+)
6%
17%
11%
33%
28%
6%
23%
Low
0%
11%
29%
50%
9%
0%
11%
Medium
2%
10%
33%
53%
2%
0%
12%
High
2%
18%
36%
44%
0%
0%
20%
Don't Know
0%
30%
0%
50%
10%
10%
30%
No Answer
8%
33%
33%
25%
0%
0%
41%
Urban
0%
32%
20%
48%
0%
0%
32%
Rural
2%
12%
32%
49%
6%
0%
14%
PML-N
0%
22%
32%
44%
2%
0%
22%
PTI
0%
33%
33%
33%
0%
0%
33%
PPP
0%
8%
42%
33%
17%
0%
8%
All others
2%
11%
30%
52%
6%
1%
13%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
196
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 65: Water Resources Development and Management (Balochistan)

to improvement in the irrigation system, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government of your
province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 17%
Very
Bad, 41%
Bad, 32%

197
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 70: Water Resources Development and Management (Balochistan)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
17%
32%
41%
5%
1%
21%
Male
6%
12%
38%
36%
8%
1%
18%
Female
2%
22%
26%
46%
3%
1%
24%
Young (Under 30)
3%
17%
38%
39%
3%
2%
20%
Middle (30-50)
5%
19%
28%
43%
5%
0%
24%
Old (50+)
6%
6%
28%
28%
28%
6%
12%
Low
2%
12%
30%
46%
9%
1%
14%
Medium
6%
18%
30%
44%
2%
0%
24%
High
2%
18%
49%
29%
2%
0%
20%
Don't Know
0%
20%
30%
40%
0%
10%
20%
No Answer
17%
58%
17%
0%
0%
8%
75%
Urban
0%
40%
32%
28%
0%
0%
40%
Rural
4%
15%
32%
42%
6%
1%
19%
PML-N
2%
32%
36%
26%
2%
2%
34%
PTI
0%
8%
58%
25%
8%
0%
8%
PPP
0%
8%
42%
33%
17%
0%
8%
All others
5%
14%
29%
46%
5%
1%
19%

Over Balochistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
198
Quality of Governance Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government

Views of Respondents from All Over Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 71: Report Card of Public Opinion on Quality of Governance - KhyberPakhtunkhwa

No.
Indicator
Law and Order
72%
45%
Poverty Alleviation
46%
32%
Education
80%
28%
Healthcare
75%
30%
Transparency
55%
53%
40%
31%
Anti- Corruption
51%
28%
45%
31%
Tax Collection
48%
30%
10
55%
55%
11
41%
46%
12
49%
37%
13

Service
37%
28%
14
Merit- Based Recruitment and

Promotions
Procurements
68%
29%
47%
32%

Governance
Inputs
58%
54%
56%
36%
59%
30%
56%
27%
15
16
17
18
19
20
90%
53%
21
Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers

Establishment of Local Governments
56%
53%

Distribution of Resources to Provincial
40%
N/A
22
201
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
23
Devolution of Powers to the Lower

Tiers Effective Devolution of Power
40%
N/A
24
59%
53%
25
Public Transport
57%
51%
26
61%
47%
27

52%
31%
28

Management
57%
35%

poverty under the current Government while 50% of
the KP respondents provided a negative rating. The
overall Approval Rating is therefore 46%.
According to the survey, 80% (Approval Rating 2015)
of the public gave positive ratings to education under
the Provincial Government while 18% gave a negative
rating.
Public Opinion on Healthcare - 75% provide
The public opinion on the effectiveness of healthcare
system stands at an overall 75% of the Respondents in
approval. On the other hand, a minority; 23% of the
Rating in 2015 stood at 55% of the KP population.
2015
202
management positively while a majority 56% of the KP

public rated it negatively. The Approval Rating in 2015
stood at a minority; 40% of the public.
Survey results show that 51% people rated anticorruption efforts as positive while 37% viewed them
the public of KP.
the Provincial Government stood at 30% of the people
in disapproval. The Approval Rating in 2015 came out
to be 48% of the population.
On the issue of utility bill collection, 55% rated it
Approval Rating for this category in 2015 was
therefore 55%.
by the Provincial Government while an outright
majority of 54% gave a negative rating. Thus, the
Government's overall Approval Rating in 2015
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
regarding the handling of unemployment was 41% of

the population of KP.
2015 for development programmes of the Provincial
37% of the public provided a positive rating for the
quality & independence of civil service under the
current Provincial Government while 32% provided a
negative rating. The Approval Rating is therefore 37%
in 2015.
The public opinion on merit-based recruitment and
promotions was above 50%, hence a majority of the
public was in approval of the system of merit-based
hiring by the Provincial Government. 68% of the public
gave a positive rating while only 26% gave a negative
rating.
Rating in 2015
negatively. The overall Approval Rating in 2015 was a
majority 58% of the KP public.
in 2015
supply of agricultural inputs by the Provincial
government. Meanwhile, 34% people rated it
negatively.

positively at a majority 59% (Approval Rating 2015)
and negatively at 36% of the population of the
province.
2015
According to the survey 56% (Approval Rating 2015)
of the public gave positive ratings to the disaster
preparedness & management of the Provincial
the people rated immunization of children positively,
making it the highest ranked indicator of the Provincial
Government. Just 8% of the people viewed the policies
on immunization negatively.
40% of the public. 27% of the respondents'views were
indicator.
public. 25% of the respondents'views were negative on
The public Opinion on the access to efficient justice
system is more than fifty percent as 59% of the
Respondents gave it a positive rating, while 17% of the
public rated it negatively.
203
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015

the people of the province.
access to safe drinking water, 61% of the respondents
gave a positive rating while 34% were of a negative
opinion. The Approval Rating in 2015 is therefore at a
majority 61% of the population of the province.
52% of the respondents gave positive ratings while
42% gave negative ratings to the Governments for its
performance on sanitation.
and Management 57% provide Approval Rating
in 2015
was 57% of the population in 2015.
204
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 66: Law and Order (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Bad, 6%
Don't
know, 4%
Very
Good, 25%
Bad, 18%
Good, 47%

205
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 72: Law and Order (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

been very good, good, bad or very bad till now
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
47%
18%
6%
4%
0%
72%
25%
47%
18%
7%
3%
1%
72%
25%
47%
18%
4%
6%
0%
72%
Young (Under 30)
30%
49%
16%
3%
2%
1%
79%
Middle (30-50)
22%
50%
17%
7%
4%
0%
72%
Old (50+)
26%
37%
23%
7%
7%
0%
63%
Low
25%
48%
18%
4%
4%
1%
73%
Medium
27%
43%
21%
3%
6%
0%
70%
High
29%
44%
14%
9%
5%
0%
73%
Don't Know
20%
40%
40%
0%
0%
0%
60%
No Answer
12%
56%
18%
12%
2%
0%
68%
Urban
44%
34%
17%
3%
2%
0%
78%
Rural
21%
49%
18%
6%
5%
0%
70%
PML-N
23%
45%
22%
7%
3%
0%
68%
PTI
34%
50%
11%
4%
1%
0%
84%
PPP
25%
25%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
All others
22%
47%
19%
6%
6%
0%
69%
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
25%
Male
Female

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
206
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 67: Poverty Alleviation (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 4%
Very
Good, 14%
Very
Bad, 26%
Good, 32%
Bad, 24%

207
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 73: Poverty Alleviation (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
32%
24%
26%
4%
0%
46%
Male
14%
31%
28%
23%
4%
1%
45%
Female
15%
33%
19%
29%
5%
0%
48%
Young (Under 30)
16%
37%
23%
19%
5%
1%
53%
Middle (30-50)
14%
31%
22%
30%
2%
0%
45%
Old (50+)
13%
24%
29%
24%
10%
0%
37%
Low
13%
24%
26%
32%
4%
0%
37%
Medium
15%
25%
24%
32%
4%
0%
40%
High
20%
43%
18%
15%
5%
0%
63%
Don't Know
40%
0%
0%
20%
40%
0%
40%
No Answer
2%
54%
28%
10%
4%
2%
56%
Urban
28%
36%
17%
17%
2%
0%
64%
Rural
12%
31%
25%
27%
5%
0%
43%
PML-N
8%
21%
36%
33%
2%
0%
29%
PTI
17%
37%
14%
28%
4%
0%
54%
PPP
0%
17%
42%
42%
0%
0%
17%
16%
33%
24%
22%
6%
0%
49%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
All others
Notes:
or 101).
208
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 68: Education (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Bad, 7%
Don't
know, 2%
Very
Good, 35%
Bad, 11%
Good, 45%

209
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 74: Education (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
35%
45%
11%
7%
2%
0%
80%
Male
33%
45%
11%
9%
1%
1%
78%
Female
36%
46%
10%
6%
3%
0%
82%
Young (Under 30)
38%
51%
5%
3%
3%
1%
89%
Middle (30-50)
33%
46%
11%
10%
1%
0%
79%
Old (50+)
33%
35%
20%
7%
4%
0%
68%
Low
33%
36%
12%
15%
4%
0%
69%
Medium
35%
48%
15%
2%
1%
0%
83%
High
44%
49%
4%
4%
0%
0%
93%
Don't Know
40%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
No Answer
18%
68%
8%
2%
2%
2%
86%
Urban
45%
34%
14%
6%
0%
0%
79%
Rural
33%
47%
10%
8%
3%
0%
80%
PML-N
25%
52%
17%
7%
0%
0%
79%
PTI
45%
39%
9%
6%
1%
0%
84%
PPP
33%
50%
8%
8%
0%
0%
83%
All others
33%
46%
10%
8%
3%
0%
79%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
210
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 69: Healthcare (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Bad, 8%
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 27%
Bad, 15%
Good, 48%

211
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 75: Healthcare (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
15%
8%
3%
0%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
75%
27%
48%
Male
29%
44%
15%
11%
2%
1%
73%
Female
24%
52%
16%
4%
3%
0%
76%
Young (Under 30)
30%
51%
13%
4%
2%
1%
81%
Middle (30-50)
24%
52%
13%
8%
2%
0%
76%
Old (50+)
30%
29%
23%
13%
4%
0%
59%
Low
31%
39%
18%
11%
2%
0%
70%
Medium
24%
58%
11%
3%
4%
0%
81%
High
35%
46%
10%
8%
1%
0%
81%
Don't Know
60%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
80%
No Answer
0%
60%
24%
8%
6%
2%
60%
Urban
36%
36%
17%
8%
3%
0%
72%
Rural
25%
50%
15%
8%
3%
0%
75%
PML-N
27%
52%
13%
8%
0%
0%
79%
PTI
34%
50%
11%
3%
2%
0%
84%
PPP
17%
42%
25%
17%
0%
0%
59%
All others
24%
46%
17%
9%
4%
0%
70%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Bad
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
212
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 70: Transparency (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 17%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 23%
Very
Bad, 10%
Bad, 17%
Good, 32%

213
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 76: Transparency (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
23%
32%
17%
10%
17%
1%
55%
Male
28%
30%
18%
13%
10%
1%
58%
Female
17%
33%
16%
7%
25%
1%
50%
Young (Under 30)
27%
34%
15%
10%
14%
0%
62%
Middle (30-50)
23%
31%
18%
10%
19%
0%
54%
Old (50+)
16%
29%
20%
12%
17%
4%
45%
Low
29%
33%
16%
13%
7%
2%
61%
Medium
20%
41%
22%
5%
12%
0%
61%
High
26%
30%
16%
15%
13%
0%
56%
Don't Know
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
0%
40%
No Answer
2%
10%
14%
6%
68%
0%
12%
Urban
28%
25%
19%
16%
13%
0%
53%
Rural
22%
33%
17%
9%
18%
1%
55%
PML-N
25%
35%
25%
10%
3%
0%
60%
PTI
31%
33%
11%
7%
17%
1%
64%
PPP
8%
67%
8%
17%
0%
0%
75%
All others
19%
28%
19%
11%
22%
1%
47%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
214
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 71: Energy Production and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 5%
Very
Good, 13%
Very
Bad, 26%
Good, 27%
Bad, 30%

215
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 77: Energy Production and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
13%
27%
30%
26%
5%
0%
40%
Male
13%
30%
28%
25%
5%
0%
43%
Female
12%
22%
34%
27%
5%
1%
34%
Young (Under 30)
15%
29%
24%
27%
6%
0%
44%
Middle (30-50)
11%
24%
37%
26%
3%
0%
35%
Old (50+)
13%
32%
23%
25%
6%
1%
45%
Low
13%
34%
30%
20%
3%
1%
47%
Medium
11%
21%
32%
33%
3%
0%
32%
High
19%
25%
26%
25%
5%
0%
44%
Don't Know
20%
40%
20%
20%
0%
0%
60%
No Answer
2%
14%
38%
30%
16%
0%
16%
Urban
19%
22%
20%
38%
2%
0%
41%
Rural
11%
27%
32%
23%
6%
0%
38%
PML-N
14%
20%
46%
20%
0%
0%
34%
PTI
18%
25%
35%
19%
3%
0%
43%
PPP
0%
33%
25%
33%
8%
0%
33%
All others
11%
28%
25%
29%
7%
0%
39%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
216
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 72: Anti-Corruption (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

No
Don't
Answer,
1%
know, 11%
Very
Good, 14%
Very
Bad, 11%
Good, 37%
Bad, 26%

217
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 78: Anti-Corruption (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Regarding the eradication or minimization of corruption, and improving the performance of related
institutions such as the Provincial Department for Anti-Corruption, please tell us if the performance of the
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
37%
26%
11%
11%
1%
51%
Male
18%
37%
22%
13%
9%
1%
55%
Female
10%
37%
30%
8%
14%
2%
47%
Young (Under 30)
17%
39%
29%
8%
7%
1%
56%
Middle (30-50)
13%
41%
22%
12%
12%
1%
54%
Old (50+)
10%
25%
32%
13%
17%
3%
35%
Low
16%
28%
23%
17%
13%
3%
44%
Medium
11%
41%
31%
7%
10%
0%
52%
High
20%
38%
23%
8%
13%
0%
58%
Don't Know
20%
60%
0%
0%
20%
0%
80%
No Answer
2%
54%
34%
4%
6%
0%
56%
Urban
13%
31%
30%
9%
16%
2%
44%
Rural
14%
38%
25%
11%
10%
1%
52%
PML-N
18%
37%
23%
18%
2%
2%
55%
PTI
14%
35%
30%
10%
9%
2%
49%
PPP
8%
67%
8%
0%
17%
0%
75%
All others
13%
37%
26%
9%
14%
1%
50%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
218
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 73: Investment Friendliness (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 13%
Don't
know, 28%
Good, 32%
Very
Bad, 8%
Bad, 19%

219
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 79: Investment Friendliness (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
13%
32%
19%
8%
28%
2%
45%
Male
15%
34%
24%
8%
17%
1%
49%
Female
11%
29%
12%
7%
40%
2%
40%
Young (Under 30)
14%
35%
22%
3%
27%
0%
49%
Middle (30-50)
12%
32%
14%
10%
31%
2%
44%
Old (50+)
16%
26%
26%
9%
20%
3%
42%
Low
16%
33%
24%
12%
14%
1%
49%
Medium
11%
39%
20%
3%
25%
2%
50%
High
16%
38%
11%
8%
25%
3%
54%
Don't Know
20%
0%
0%
20%
60%
0%
20%
No Answer
0%
4%
12%
4%
80%
0%
4%
Urban
28%
31%
14%
9%
17%
0%
59%
Rural
10%
32%
19%
7%
30%
2%
42%
PML-N
15%
48%
27%
2%
7%
2%
63%
PTI
13%
36%
10%
9%
32%
0%
49%
PPP
8%
23%
31%
15%
15%
8%
31%
All others
13%
26%
19%
8%
32%
2%
39%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Bad
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
220
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 74: Tax Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Question: The current Provincial Government of your Province has been in power for almost one year.
Regarding improvements in ensuring of tax collection, please tell us if the Provincial Government's performance
has been very good, good, bad or very bad?
Don't
know, 21%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 13%
Very
Bad, 9%
Good, 35%
Bad, 21%

221
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 80: Tax Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
13%
Good
Bad
3
21%
Very
Bad
4
9%
Don't
Know
5
21%
No
Answer
6
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
48%
2
35%
Male
16%
36%
26%
11%
11%
1%
52%
Female
10%
33%
15%
7%
33%
1%
43%
Young (Under 30)
10%
41%
18%
8%
22%
2%
51%
Middle (30-50)
14%
36%
21%
8%
21%
1%
50%
Old (50+)
16%
22%
28%
15%
19%
1%
38%
Low
18%
30%
26%
14%
12%
1%
48%
Medium
10%
39%
28%
8%
15%
0%
49%
High
14%
53%
10%
1%
20%
3%
67%
Don't Know
20%
0%
0%
0%
80%
0%
20%
No Answer
2%
14%
10%
12%
60%
2%
16%
Urban
20%
33%
28%
9%
9%
0%
53%
Rural
12%
35%
20%
9%
23%
2%
47%
PML-N
14%
51%
17%
5%
12%
2%
65%
PTI
12%
37%
22%
7%
22%
0%
49%
PPP
17%
50%
17%
8%
8%
0%
67%
All others
14%
29%
22%
11%
23%
2%
43%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
222
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 75: Utility Bills Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

No
Don't
Answer,
1%
know, 10%
Very
Good, 19%
Very
Bad, 15%
Bad, 19%
Good, 36%

Sample Size: 390; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: July 16 August 6, 2014.
223
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 81: Utility Bills Collection (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Regarding ensuring collection of utility bills, please tell us if the Provincial Government's performance has been
very good, good, bad or very bad?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
19%
36%
19%
15%
10%
1%
55%
Male
15%
38%
22%
16%
8%
1%
53%
Female
24%
33%
15%
14%
13%
1%
57%
Young (Under 30)
21%
33%
21%
14%
12%
0%
54%
Middle (30-50)
21%
37%
18%
17%
6%
2%
58%
Old (50+)
12%
38%
17%
15%
16%
3%
50%
Low
19%
39%
16%
12%
12%
3%
58%
Medium
27%
34%
23%
8%
8%
0%
61%
High
19%
53%
13%
4%
11%
1%
72%
Don't Know
20%
20%
0%
40%
20%
0%
40%
No Answer
0%
4%
30%
58%
8%
0%
4%
Urban
23%
48%
19%
6%
3%
0%
71%
Rural
18%
33%
19%
17%
11%
2%
51%
PML-N
27%
40%
20%
3%
10%
0%
67%
PTI
24%
41%
14%
14%
4%
2%
65%
PPP
25%
50%
17%
8%
0%
0%
75%
All others
15%
31%
20%
19%
13%
1%
46%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
224
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 76: Management of Unemployment (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 5%
Very
Good, 12%
Very
Bad, 28%
Good, 29%
Bad, 26%

225
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 82: Management of Unemployment (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
12%
29%
26%
28%
5%
0%
41%
Male
13%
31%
31%
23%
3%
0%
44%
Female
12%
28%
21%
32%
7%
0%
40%
Young (Under 30)
12%
34%
25%
25%
4%
0%
46%
Middle (30-50)
11%
28%
27%
30%
4%
0%
39%
Old (50+)
17%
25%
28%
22%
9%
0%
42%
Low
12%
20%
36%
30%
3%
0%
32%
Medium
9%
27%
17%
43%
4%
0%
36%
High
18%
34%
21%
18%
10%
0%
52%
Don't Know
60%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
80%
No Answer
4%
56%
26%
8%
6%
0%
60%
Urban
19%
25%
25%
27%
5%
0%
44%
Rural
11%
30%
27%
28%
5%
0%
41%
PML-N
7%
25%
38%
30%
0%
0%
32%
PTI
12%
33%
28%
23%
3%
0%
45%
PPP
0%
33%
25%
42%
0%
0%
33%
All others
14%
29%
22%
28%
7%
0%
43%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
226
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 77: Development Programmes (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Question: The current Provincial Government of your Province has been in power for almost two years.
No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 21%
Very
Good, 15%
Very
Bad, 12%
Good, 34%
Bad, 19%

227
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 83: Development Programmes (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
15%
Good
Bad
3
19%
Very
Bad
4
12%
Don't
Know
5
21%
No
Answer
6
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2
34%
Male
15%
32%
25%
14%
13%
1%
47%
Female
14%
35%
11%
10%
30%
0%
49%
Young (Under 30)
15%
37%
14%
12%
21%
0%
53%
Middle (30-50)
15%
38%
18%
9%
20%
1%
53%
Old (50+)
13%
16%
28%
22%
20%
1%
29%
Low
14%
30%
26%
17%
12%
1%
44%
Medium
10%
52%
14%
10%
13%
0%
62%
High
28%
34%
16%
6%
15%
1%
62%
Don't Know
20%
0%
20%
20%
40%
0%
20%
No Answer
2%
8%
8%
10%
72%
0%
10%
Urban
23%
31%
19%
16%
11%
0%
54%
Rural
13%
34%
19%
12%
22%
1%
47%
PML-N
17%
48%
25%
5%
5%
0%
65%
PTI
20%
34%
17%
10%
17%
1%
54%
PPP
8%
25%
50%
8%
8%
0%
33%
All others
12%
30%
16%
15%
27%
0%
42%

Over KP
Gender-wise
49%
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
228
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 78: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

very bad till now?
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 15%
Don't
know, 30%
Good, 22%
Very
Bad, 13%
Bad, 19%

229
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 84: Quality and Independence of Civil Service (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

very bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
19%
13%
30%
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
37%
15%
22%
Male
20%
26%
21%
16%
17%
1%
46%
Female
10%
19%
16%
11%
44%
1%
29%
Young (Under 30)
17%
27%
14%
11%
30%
0%
44%
Middle (30-50)
14%
22%
20%
15%
29%
2%
36%
Old (50+)
17%
16%
23%
15%
29%
0%
33%
Low
17%
32%
19%
15%
17%
1%
49%
Medium
11%
19%
24%
15%
30%
1%
30%
High
24%
15%
19%
10%
30%
3%
39%
Don't Know
20%
20%
0%
40%
20%
0%
40%
No Answer
4%
8%
8%
8%
72%
0%
12%
Urban
11%
30%
25%
23%
11%
0%
41%
Rural
16%
21%
17%
11%
33%
1%
37%
PML-N
32%
23%
22%
7%
17%
0%
55%
PTI
16%
27%
14%
10%
32%
1%
43%
PPP
8%
17%
25%
0%
50%
0%
25%
All others
11%
20%
19%
17%
31%
1%
31%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Bad
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
230
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 79: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Bad, 7%
Don't
know, 6%
Very
Good, 34%
Bad, 19%
Good, 34%

231
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 85: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
34%
34%
19%
7%
6%
0%
68%
Male
36%
28%
21%
11%
3%
0%
64%
Female
31%
41%
17%
2%
10%
0%
72%
Young (Under 30)
37%
36%
15%
5%
6%
0%
73%
Middle (30-50)
31%
36%
20%
8%
5%
0%
67%
Old (50+)
38%
22%
26%
4%
10%
0%
60%
Low
44%
25%
16%
11%
5%
0%
69%
Medium
32%
40%
23%
2%
4%
0%
72%
High
35%
28%
24%
5%
9%
0%
63%
Don't Know
20%
20%
20%
0%
40%
0%
40%
No Answer
4%
64%
18%
6%
8%
0%
68%
Urban
53%
17%
23%
3%
3%
0%
70%
Rural
30%
37%
19%
7%
7%
0%
67%
PML-N
30%
35%
25%
5%
5%
0%
65%
PTI
34%
39%
16%
5%
6%
0%
73%
PPP
18%
46%
18%
18%
0%
0%
64%
All others
35%
31%
19%
7%
7%
0%
66%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
232
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 80: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Dont
Know 27%
No Answer
3%
Very
Good, 16%
Good, 31%
Very Bad, 9%
Bad 14%%

233
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 86: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
16%
31%
14%
9%
27%
3%
47%
Male
17%
36%
18%
11%
13%
4%
53%
Female
14%
25%
10%
5%
44%
2%
39%
Young (Under 30)
13%
33%
12%
9%
30%
3%
46%
Middle (30-50)
15%
35%
13%
7%
27%
2%
50%
Old (50+)
23%
17%
22%
12%
22%
4%
40%
Low
18%
34%
18%
12%
12%
4%
52%
Medium
19%
36%
13%
4%
26%
2%
55%
High
14%
29%
13%
8%
34%
4%
43%
40%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Don't Know
0%
40%
0%
40%
20%
0%
No Answer
2%
12%
8%
6%
72%
0%
14%
Urban
34%
38%
11%
3%
14%
0%
72%
Rural
12%
30%
15%
10%
30%
4%
42%
PML-N
15%
47%
22%
3%
10%
3%
62%
PTI
20%
32%
11%
7%
26%
3%
52%
PPP
8%
50%
25%
8%
8%
0%
66%
All others
14%
26%
13%
11%
33%
3%
40%
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
234
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 81: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Question: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years.,
in the use of technologies, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good,
Don't
know, 21%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 24%
Very
Bad, 9%
Bad, 12%
Good, 34%

235
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 87: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Question: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years.,
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
24%
34%
12%
9%
21%
1%
58%
Male
27%
36%
16%
11%
10%
1%
63%
Female
21%
32%
7%
7%
33%
0%
53%
Young (Under 30)
31%
33%
11%
7%
17%
2%
64%
Middle (30-50)
21%
38%
11%
10%
21%
1%
59%
Old (50+)
23%
25%
16%
10%
26%
0%
48%
Low
17%
39%
17%
15%
11%
1%
56%
Medium
38%
41%
9%
2%
9%
0%
79%
High
35%
30%
9%
6%
20%
0%
65%
Don't Know
40%
0%
20%
0%
40%
0%
40%
No Answer
0%
10%
4%
8%
76%
2%
10%
Urban
56%
25%
8%
2%
9%
0%
81%
Rural
19%
35%
12%
10%
23%
1%
54%
PML-N
20%
45%
22%
5%
8%
0%
65%
PTI
25%
34%
9%
9%
22%
1%
59%
PPP
8%
58%
17%
17%
0%
0%
66%
All others
26%
30%
10%
10%
24%
1%
56%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
236
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 82: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 10%
Very
Good, 19%
Very
Bad, 11%
Bad, 23%
Good, 37%

237
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 88: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
19%
Good
Bad
3
23%
Very
Bad
4
11%
Don't
Know
5
10%
No
Answer
6
0%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2
37%
Male
18%
37%
29%
12%
4%
1%
55%
Female
20%
37%
16%
9%
18%
0%
57%
Young (Under 30)
20%
42%
17%
10%
11%
0%
62%
Middle (30-50)
20%
36%
24%
11%
9%
1%
56%
Old (50+)
17%
30%
30%
10%
12%
0%
47%
Low
19%
33%
29%
12%
8%
0%
52%
Medium
21%
52%
18%
5%
5%
0%
73%
High
28%
43%
15%
3%
11%
1%
71%
Don't Know
20%
40%
20%
0%
20%
0%
60%
No Answer
4%
8%
26%
34%
28%
0%
12%
Urban
30%
42%
20%
8%
0%
0%
72%
Rural
17%
36%
23%
11%
12%
0%
53%
PML-N
18%
45%
22%
8%
7%
0%
63%
PTI
11%
48%
20%
6%
15%
0%
59%
PPP
0%
42%
33%
25%
0%
0%
42%
All others
24%
30%
24%
12%
10%
0%
54%

Over KP
Gender-wise
56%
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
238
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 83: Environmental Sustainability (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 22%
Very
Bad, 18%
Bad, 18%
Good, 37%

239
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 89: Environmental Sustainability (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
22%
37%
18%
18%
5%
1%
59%
Male
24%
37%
18%
15%
5%
1%
61%
Female
20%
36%
18%
21%
5%
0%
56%
Young (Under 30)
26%
36%
14%
17%
7%
0%
62%
Middle (30-50)
18%
38%
19%
21%
4%
1%
56%
Old (50+)
26%
36%
20%
12%
6%
0%
62%
Low
18%
36%
23%
19%
3%
1%
54%
Medium
28%
49%
17%
3%
4%
0%
77%
High
36%
43%
13%
4%
4%
1%
79%
Don't Know
20%
20%
0%
20%
40%
0%
40%
No Answer
0%
4%
14%
68%
14%
0%
4%
Urban
41%
31%
20%
5%
3%
0%
72%
Rural
19%
38%
17%
20%
6%
1%
57%
PML-N
17%
57%
15%
10%
2%
0%
74%
PTI
21%
40%
16%
13%
8%
1%
61%
PPP
8%
58%
17%
8%
8%
0%
66%
All others
25%
29%
19%
22%
5%
0%
54%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
240
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 84: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

bad till now?
Don't
know, 7%
Very
Good, 23%
Very
Bad, 15%
Bad, 22%
Good, 33%

241
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 90: Disaster Preparedness and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
23%
33%
22%
15%
7%
0%
56%
Male
21%
34%
26%
14%
6%
1%
55%
Female
25%
32%
17%
17%
9%
0%
57%
Young (Under 30)
21%
33%
20%
19%
8%
0%
54%
Middle (30-50)
20%
38%
22%
16%
3%
0%
58%
Old (50+)
35%
20%
26%
6%
12%
1%
55%
Low
30%
34%
17%
10%
9%
1%
64%
Medium
18%
44%
29%
8%
2%
0%
62%
High
28%
33%
26%
6%
8%
0%
61%
Don't Know
20%
40%
0%
20%
20%
0%
60%
No Answer
2%
6%
18%
66%
8%
0%
8%
Urban
39%
23%
22%
13%
3%
0%
62%
Rural
20%
35%
22%
16%
8%
0%
55%
PML-N
27%
52%
18%
2%
0%
2%
79%
PTI
25%
34%
22%
13%
5%
0%
59%
PPP
0%
42%
25%
17%
17%
0%
42%
All others
22%
27%
22%
20%
9%
0%
49%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
242
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 85: Immunization of Children (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Bad, 2%
Don't
know, 2%
Bad, 6%
Very
Good, 54%
Good, 36%

243
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 91: Immunization of Children (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
54%
Good
Bad
3
6%
Very
Bad
4
2%
Don't
Know
5
2%
No
Answer
6
0%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
90%
2
36%
Male
51%
36%
9%
3%
1%
0%
87%
Female
57%
36%
3%
1%
3%
0%
93%
Young (Under 30)
57%
33%
5%
4%
2%
0%
90%
Middle (30-50)
51%
40%
6%
1%
1%
0%
91%
Old (50+)
59%
29%
7%
1%
3%
0%
88%
Low
43%
42%
11%
3%
1%
0%
85%
Medium
75%
20%
3%
1%
2%
0%
95%
High
80%
19%
0%
0%
1%
0%
99%
Don't Know
20%
40%
20%
20%
0%
0%
60%
No Answer
8%
78%
4%
6%
4%
0%
86%
Urban
83%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Rural
49%
40%
7%
3%
2%
0%
89%
PML-N
50%
38%
8%
2%
2%
0%
88%
PTI
59%
32%
6%
2%
1%
0%
91%
PPP
58%
25%
17%
0%
0%
0%
83%
All others
53%
38%
5%
3%
2%
0%
91%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
244
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 22%
Very
Good, 17%
Very
Bad, 9%
Bad, 12%
Good, 39%

245
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 92: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Establishment of Local Governments
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
17%
39%
12%
9%
22%
1%
56%
Male
19%
42%
14%
13%
12%
1%
61%
Female
15%
36%
11%
5%
33%
0%
51%
Young (Under 30)
21%
40%
8%
5%
26%
1%
61%
Middle (30-50)
13%
43%
12%
12%
21%
0%
56%
Old (50+)
22%
26%
20%
10%
20%
1%
48%
Low
16%
35%
17%
19%
12%
1%
51%
Medium
22%
51%
8%
2%
19%
0%
73%
High
22%
43%
9%
3%
24%
0%
65%
Don't Know
0%
40%
0%
0%
60%
0%
40%
No Answer
2%
20%
16%
6%
56%
0%
22%
Urban
44%
31%
6%
5%
14%
0%
75%
Rural
12%
40%
13%
10%
24%
1%
52%
PML-N
7%
60%
18%
7%
7%
2%
67%
PTI
20%
43%
7%
8%
20%
1%
63%
PPP
8%
58%
0%
17%
17%
0%
66%
All others
19%
31%
14%
10%
27%
0%
50%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
246
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
No
Answer, 1 %
Very
Good, 15%
Don't
know, 32%
Good, 25%
Very
Bad, 11%
Bad, 16%

247
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 93: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Distribution of Resources to Provincial
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
15%
25%
16%
11%
32%
1%
40%
Male
17%
37%
19%
11%
16%
0%
54%
Female
12%
12%
13%
11%
51%
2%
24%
Young (Under 30)
18%
26%
17%
10%
30%
0%
44%
Middle (30-50)
12%
26%
17%
10%
33%
2%
38%
Old (50+)
16%
22%
13%
16%
33%
0%
38%
Low
10%
31%
26%
15%
18%
0%
41%
Medium
22%
24%
8%
8%
35%
4%
46%
High
22%
24%
9%
11%
34%
0%
46%
Don't Know
0%
0%
20%
20%
60%
0%
0%
No Answer
4%
10%
12%
8%
66%
0%
14%
Urban
48%
20%
17%
5%
9%
0%
68%
Rural
8%
26%
16%
13%
36%
1%
34%
PML-N
10%
32%
27%
2%
30%
0%
42%
PTI
13%
28%
14%
10%
32%
2%
41%
PPP
8%
25%
25%
8%
33%
0%
33%
All others
17%
22%
14%
14%
32%
1%
39%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
248
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 88: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Effective Devolution of Power (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa)
No
Answer, 5 %
Very
Good, 14%
Don't
know, 29%
Good, 26%
Very
Bad, 10%
Bad, 15%

249
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 94: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Effective Devolution of Power (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
26%
15%
10%
29%
5%
40%
Male
16%
35%
22%
10%
15%
2%
51%
Female
12%
16%
6%
11%
46%
10%
28%
Young (Under 30)
17%
31%
13%
8%
26%
5%
48%
Middle (30-50)
13%
25%
15%
11%
29%
7%
38%
Old (50+)
12%
22%
15%
13%
38%
1%
34%
Low
12%
31%
20%
12%
22%
3%
43%
Medium
20%
23%
10%
10%
24%
12%
43%
High
19%
27%
9%
11%
30%
4%
46%
Don't Know
20%
20%
0%
0%
60%
0%
40%
No Answer
0%
14%
16%
4%
64%
2%
14%
Urban
39%
19%
9%
16%
17%
0%
58%
Rural
9%
28%
16%
9%
32%
6%
37%
PML-N
5%
43%
17%
7%
13%
15%
48%
PTI
13%
24%
13%
12%
35%
2%
37%
PPP
17%
33%
0%
0%
25%
25%
50%
All others
17%
22%
16%
11%
31%
3%
39%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
250
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 89: Access to Efficient Justice System (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

till now?
Don't
know, 24%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 20%
Very
Bad, 7%
Bad, 10%
Good, 39%

251
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 95: Access to Efficient Justice System (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
20%
39%
10%
7%
24%
1%
59%
Male
25%
37%
15%
9%
13%
1%
62%
Female
13%
40%
4%
4%
37%
1%
53%
Young (Under 30)
18%
43%
8%
6%
24%
1%
61%
Middle (30-50)
21%
39%
12%
6%
21%
1%
60%
Old (50+)
20%
30%
7%
9%
32%
1%
50%
Low
27%
40%
17%
4%
11%
1%
67%
Medium
16%
51%
4%
10%
20%
0%
67%
High
19%
39%
5%
6%
28%
3%
58%
Don't Know
20%
0%
0%
0%
80%
0%
20%
No Answer
4%
12%
10%
8%
66%
0%
16%
Urban
28%
47%
8%
9%
8%
0%
75%
Rural
18%
37%
10%
6%
27%
1%
55%
PML-N
20%
60%
10%
3%
7%
0%
80%
PTI
18%
44%
15%
2%
20%
0%
62%
PPP
17%
42%
25%
0%
8%
8%
59%
All others
20%
31%
7%
10%
31%
1%
51%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
252
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 90: Public Transport (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 5%
Very
Good, 24%
Very
Bad, 23%
Bad, 15%
Good, 33%

253
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 96: Public Transport (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
24%
33%
15%
23%
5%
0%
57%
Male
24%
27%
19%
26%
4%
0%
51%
Female
23%
40%
11%
20%
6%
1%
63%
Young (Under 30)
21%
30%
15%
27%
8%
0%
51%
Middle (30-50)
23%
35%
15%
24%
3%
0%
58%
Old (50+)
31%
33%
17%
13%
4%
1%
64%
Low
33%
23%
20%
19%
4%
1%
56%
Medium
20%
50%
14%
13%
4%
0%
70%
High
25%
45%
13%
11%
6%
0%
70%
Don't Know
0%
40%
20%
20%
20%
0%
40%
No Answer
2%
8%
6%
78%
6%
0%
10%
Urban
45%
25%
17%
9%
3%
0%
70%
Rural
20%
34%
15%
26%
5%
0%
54%
PML-N
10%
56%
13%
20%
2%
0%
66%
PTI
24%
43%
11%
21%
1%
0%
67%
PPP
25%
25%
17%
33%
0%
0%
50%
All others
27%
23%
17%
25%
8%
0%
50%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
254
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 91: Access to Safe Drinking Water(Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 21%
Very
Bad, 16%
Bad, 18%
Good, 40%

255
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 97: Access to Safe Drinking Water (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
40%
18%
16%
5%
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
61%
21%
Male
20%
35%
23%
17%
4%
1%
55%
Female
22%
46%
11%
15%
6%
1%
68%
Young (Under 30)
18%
46%
13%
14%
8%
1%
64%
Middle (30-50)
22%
37%
20%
19%
3%
0%
59%
Old (50+)
24%
40%
19%
13%
3%
1%
64%
Low
25%
34%
22%
14%
4%
1%
59%
Medium
13%
55%
17%
11%
4%
0%
68%
High
34%
39%
14%
6%
8%
0%
73%
Don't Know
20%
20%
0%
40%
20%
0%
40%
No Answer
4%
32%
12%
48%
4%
0%
36%
Urban
48%
20%
22%
6%
3%
0%
68%
Rural
16%
44%
17%
18%
5%
1%
60%
PML-N
13%
54%
23%
8%
0%
2%
67%
PTI
26%
46%
15%
12%
1%
0%
72%
PPP
8%
50%
17%
25%
0%
0%
58%
All others
22%
33%
17%
19%
8%
0%
55%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
256
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 92: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa)
Don't
know, 5%
Very
Bad, 18%
No Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 16%
Good, 36%
Bad, 24%

257
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 98: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa)
Very
Good
Bad
Very
Don't
No
16%
36%
24%
18%
5%
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
52%
Male
16%
34%
29%
17%
4%
1%
50%
Female
16%
40%
18%
20%
6%
1%
56%
Young (Under 30)
17%
38%
21%
17%
8%
0%
55%
Middle (30-50)
16%
37%
24%
21%
2%
1%
53%
Old (50+)
16%
34%
30%
11%
7%
1%
50%
Low
15%
38%
26%
17%
4%
1%
53%
Medium
12%
48%
27%
8%
5%
0%
60%
High
31%
40%
18%
6%
4%
1%
71%
Don't Know
0%
20%
20%
40%
20%
0%
20%
No Answer
0%
4%
22%
64%
10%
0%
4%
Urban
28%
28%
33%
8%
3%
0%
56%
Rural
14%
38%
23%
20%
5%
1%
52%
PML-N
15%
51%
23%
8%
3%
0%
66%
PTI
18%
43%
18%
19%
2%
0%
61%
PPP
8%
58%
8%
25%
0%
0%
66%
All others
16%
29%
28%
20%
7%
1%
45%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
258
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 93:Water Resources Development and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Don't
know, 7%
Very
Bad, 15%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 16%
Bad, 21%
Good, 41%

259
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 99:Water Resources Development and Management (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Very
Good
1
16%
Good
Bad
3
21%
Very
Bad
4
15%
Don't
Know
5
7%
No
Answer
6
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
57%
2
41%
Male
14%
41%
23%
15%
6%
1%
55%
Female
18%
42%
18%
14%
8%
1%
60%
Young (Under 30)
15%
45%
20%
14%
6%
0%
60%
Middle (30-50)
14%
43%
17%
18%
8%
0%
57%
Old (50+)
21%
30%
31%
9%
6%
3%
51%
Low
17%
41%
21%
12%
7%
1%
58%
Medium
12%
51%
24%
7%
6%
0%
63%
High
28%
48%
14%
5%
6%
0%
76%
Don't Know
0%
40%
0%
20%
40%
0%
40%
No Answer
2%
10%
22%
58%
8%
0%
12%
Urban
20%
36%
36%
5%
3%
0%
56%
Rural
15%
42%
18%
17%
8%
1%
57%
PML-N
15%
53%
25%
3%
3%
2%
68%
PTI
19%
54%
13%
9%
5%
0%
73%
PPP
8%
50%
8%
25%
8%
0%
58%
All others
15%
33%
23%
20%
9%
0%
48%

Over KP
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
260
Quality of Governance Punjab Government

Views of Respondents from All Over Punjab
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 100: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance Punjab

No.
Indicator
Law and Order
51%
55%
Poverty Alleviation
29%
32%
Education
75%
62%
Healthcare
60%
56%
Transparency
25%
46%
37%
25%
Anti-Corruption
23%
31%
44%
49%
Tax Collection
35%
45%
10
60%
58%
11
25%
34%
12
51%
54%
13
22%
40%
14
Merit- Based Recruitment and Promotions
39%
33%
15

Procurements
24%
53%
52%
45%
17

Inputs
41%
18
32%
44%
19
43%
45%
20
91%
73%
21

26%
37%
22

Distribution of Resources to Provincial
24%
N/A
23

Effective Devolution of Power
21%
N/A
24
39%
52%
25
Public Transport
61%
72%
16
44%
263
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
26
Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply
44%
51%
27

Management
35%
40%
40%
48%
28

majority, 68% of the Punjabi respondentsprovided a
therefore 29%.
According to the survey 75% of the respondents from
Punjabgave positive ratings to education under the
Provincial Government, while 21% gave a negative
rating.
The public Opinion on the effectiveness of health care
approval. On the other hand, a minority; 36% of the
corruption efforts as positive while 60% viewed them

the public of Punjab.
the Provincial Government stood at 34% of the
respondents in disapproval. The Approval Rating in
2015 came out to be 35% of the sample population.
therefore 60%.

Rating in 2015 stood at 25% of the Punjabi population.

by the Provincial Government while an outright
majority of 71% gave a negative rating. Thus, the
Government's overall Approval Rating in 2015
regarding the handling of unemployment was a
minority 25% of the population of Punjab.

2015
management positively while a majority; 61% of the
Punjabi public rated it negatively. The Approval Rating
in 2015 stood at a minority; 37% of the public.


Survey results show that only 23% people rated anti-

Only 22% of the public provided a positive rating for
the quality & independence of civil service under the
264
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
current Government while 29% provided a negative

rating. The Approval Rating is therefore 22% in 2015.
The public opinion on merit-based recruitment and
promotions was below 50%, which suggests that the
public was not in approval of the system of merit-based
hiring by the Provincial Government. 39% of the
respondents gave a positive rating while 46% gave a
negative rating.
Rating in 2015
According to the survey a minority 24% of the public
gave positive ratings to the clean, efficient and
economic public procurements while 23% gave a
negative rating. Thus the Approval Rating in 2015 is
24%.
52% of the respondentsrated the use of technologies for
better governance as positive while only 12% rated it
majority 52% of the public.
in 2015
supply of agricultural inputs by the
ProvincialGovernment. Meanwhile, 43%
respondentsrated it negatively.
positively at a minority 32% and negatively at 55% of
the population of the province. Thus, a majority of
Punjabi respondents disapproved of the work of the
Provincial Government for their environment.
2015

the people rated immunization of children positively,
making it the highest ranked indicator of the
ProvincialGovernment. Just 7% of the people viewed
the policies on immunization negatively.
Lower Tiers: Estbalishment of Local Governments
public. 20% of the sample population's views were
indicator.
24% of the public. 24% of the population's views were
indicator.
system is 39% of the public. In contrast, 26% of the
respondents rated it negatively.
the people of the province.
Regarding the Government's performance on access to
265
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
safe drinking water, a minority 44% of the respondents

gave a positive rating while a majority 53% was of a
negative opinion. The Approval Rating in 2015 is
therefore 44% of the population of the province.
35% of the respondents gave positive ratings while an
outright majority of 62% gave negative ratings to the
in 2015
266
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 94: Law and Order (Punjab)

Don't
know, 9%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 8%
Very
Bad, 16%
Good, 43%
Bad, 24%

267
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 101: Law and Order (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
8%
43%
24%
16%
9%
1%
51%
Male
8%
44%
24%
18%
6%
0%
52%
Female
7%
41%
24%
15%
12%
1%
48%
Young (Under 30)
9%
47%
24%
14%
6%
0%
56%
Middle (30-50)
7%
42%
23%
17%
9%
1%
49%
Old (50+)
6%
38%
26%
18%
11%
1%
44%
Low
7%
41%
25%
15%
11%
1%
48%
Medium
5%
44%
26%
19%
5%
1%
49%
High
9%
50%
23%
15%
3%
0%
59%
Don't Know
14%
37%
15%
17%
17%
1%
51%
No Answer
0%
33%
31%
31%
6%
0%
33%
Urban
8%
45%
29%
15%
3%
0%
53%
Rural
8%
41%
22%
17%
12%
1%
49%
PML-N
8%
44%
23%
15%
9%
1%
52%
PTI
5%
39%
29%
18%
8%
0%
44%
PPP
7%
29%
30%
18%
16%
1%
36%
All others
7%
44%
23%
19%
7%
1%
51%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
Methodology:Sample Size: 1778; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 June 12,
or 101).
268
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 95: Poverty Alleviation (Punjab)

Don't
know, 2%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 4%
Very
Bad, 32%
Good, 25%
Bad, 36%

269
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 102: Poverty Alleviation (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
25%
36%
32%
2%
1%
29%
Male
4%
26%
35%
33%
2%
0%
30%
Female
4%
25%
38%
30%
3%
2%
29%
Young (Under 30)
5%
27%
36%
30%
3%
0%
32%
Middle (30-50)
4%
26%
36%
32%
2%
1%
30%
Old (50+)
4%
22%
36%
33%
3%
1%
26%
Low
5%
27%
33%
32%
3%
1%
32%
Medium
4%
22%
39%
33%
2%
1%
26%
High
2%
30%
39%
27%
1%
0%
32%
Don't Know
5%
18%
41%
31%
4%
1%
23%
No Answer
3%
11%
19%
64%
3%
0%
14%
Urban
2%
25%
43%
30%
1%
0%
27%
Rural
5%
26%
33%
32%
3%
1%
31%
PML-N
4%
29%
36%
29%
2%
1%
33%
PTI
2%
15%
40%
43%
0%
1%
17%
PPP
6%
13%
32%
44%
4%
1%
19%
All others
5%
21%
35%
33%
6%
2%
26%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
270
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 96: Education (Punjab)

Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now
Very
Bad, 5%
Don't
know, 4%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 21%
Bad, 16%
Good, 54%

271
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 103: Education (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
21%
54%
16%
5%
4%
1%
75%
Male
18%
50%
21%
7%
4%
0%
68%
Female
23%
58%
11%
4%
4%
1%
81%
Young (Under 30)
22%
53%
17%
5%
3%
1%
75%
Middle (30-50)
21%
53%
16%
6%
4%
0%
74%
Old (50+)
18%
57%
14%
5%
6%
0%
75%
Low
17%
54%
16%
7%
6%
1%
71%
Medium
20%
59%
15%
3%
3%
0%
79%
High
25%
54%
16%
4%
1%
0%
79%
Don't Know
31%
47%
13%
6%
3%
0%
78%
No Answer
11%
40%
26%
17%
3%
3%
51%
Urban
23%
58%
14%
2%
3%
0%
81%
Rural
20%
52%
16%
7%
5%
1%
72%
PML-N
22%
54%
15%
5%
4%
1%
76%
PTI
14%
47%
24%
10%
5%
0%
61%
PPP
18%
49%
14%
11%
7%
1%
67%
All others
18%
55%
18%
5%
3%
0%
73%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
272
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 97: Health care (Punjab)

No
Don't Answer, 1%
know, 4%
Very
Good, 14%
Very
Bad, 12%
Bad, 24%
Good, 46%

273
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 104: Healthcare (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
46%
24%
12%
4%
1%
60%
Male
14%
40%
26%
16%
3%
1%
54%
Female
14%
52%
21%
8%
6%
1%
66%
Young (Under 30)
14%
44%
26%
14%
3%
1%
58%
Middle (30-50)
13%
49%
23%
11%
5%
0%
62%
Old (50+)
17%
41%
23%
13%
6%
1%
58%
Low
10%
47%
25%
13%
4%
1%
58%
Medium
12%
50%
22%
11%
3%
1%
62%
High
22%
43%
22%
10%
3%
0%
65%
Don't Know
21%
40%
21%
13%
6%
0%
61%
No Answer
6%
31%
31%
19%
14%
0%
37%
Urban
17%
45%
23%
12%
3%
0%
62%
Rural
13%
46%
24%
12%
5%
1%
59%
PML-N
16%
48%
21%
11%
4%
0%
64%
PTI
13%
37%
29%
19%
2%
0%
50%
PPP
10%
51%
21%
6%
11%
1%
61%
All others
8%
39%
32%
15%
5%
1%
47%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
274
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 98: Transparency (Punjab)

No
Very
Answer, 3% Good, 3%
Good, 22%
Don't
know, 43%
Bad, 18%
Very
Bad, 11%

275
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 105: Transparency (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
22%
18%
11%
43%
3%
25%
Male
3%
24%
20%
13%
36%
3%
27%
Female
3%
20%
15%
8%
50%
4%
23%
Young (Under 30)
4%
26%
20%
9%
37%
4%
30%
Middle (30-50)
3%
23%
17%
11%
44%
3%
26%
Old (50+)
4%
16%
16%
11%
49%
4%
20%
Low
4%
20%
18%
11%
42%
5%
24%
Medium
1%
24%
20%
10%
42%
3%
25%
High
3%
32%
17%
11%
37%
1%
35%
Don't Know
5%
15%
8%
8%
62%
2%
20%
No Answer
3%
14%
19%
17%
44%
3%
17%
Urban
3%
28%
22%
9%
35%
2%
31%
Rural
3%
20%
15%
11%
47%
4%
23%
PML-N
3%
24%
17%
9%
44%
3%
27%
PTI
3%
18%
30%
13%
37%
0%
21%
PPP
1%
21%
13%
14%
43%
7%
22%
All others
4%
18%
17%
14%
42%
7%
22%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
276
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 99: Energy Production and Management (Punjab)

Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 5%
Very
Bad, 30%
Good, 32%
Bad, 31%

277
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 106: Energy Production and Management (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
32%
31%
30%
3%
1%
37%
Male
5%
37%
27%
29%
2%
0%
42%
Female
4%
28%
34%
30%
3%
1%
32%
Young (Under 30)
5%
30%
31%
30%
3%
1%
35%
Middle (30-50)
5%
33%
31%
29%
2%
0%
38%
Old (50+)
4%
32%
31%
31%
3%
0%
36%
Low
5%
28%
32%
30%
3%
1%
33%
Medium
3%
31%
30%
33%
3%
0%
34%
High
5%
41%
30%
24%
1%
0%
46%
Don't Know
3%
39%
29%
26%
3%
0%
42%
No Answer
0%
25%
22%
50%
3%
0%
25%
Urban
4%
34%
36%
25%
1%
0%
38%
Rural
5%
31%
28%
32%
3%
1%
36%
PML-N
5%
34%
29%
29%
2%
1%
39%
PTI
4%
23%
38%
34%
1%
0%
27%
PPP
5%
32%
32%
25%
6%
0%
37%
All others
3%
29%
32%
32%
4%
0%
32%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
278
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 100: Anti-Corruption (Punjab)

Don't
know, 16%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 19%
Very
Bad, 31%
Bad, 29%

279
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 107: Anti-Corruption (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
19%
29%
31%
16%
1%
23%
Male
4%
27%
28%
33%
8%
1%
31%
Female
3%
12%
31%
29%
24%
1%
15%
Young (Under 30)
3%
25%
30%
28%
13%
0%
28%
Middle (30-50)
4%
17%
30%
32%
16%
1%
21%
Old (50+)
3%
19%
26%
32%
19%
1%
22%
Low
4%
20%
29%
28%
19%
1%
24%
Medium
2%
21%
30%
37%
10%
1%
23%
High
4%
21%
33%
33%
7%
2%
25%
Don't Know
4%
12%
25%
26%
32%
1%
16%
No Answer
3%
19%
14%
39%
25%
0%
22%
Urban
3%
20%
32%
35%
8%
2%
23%
Rural
4%
19%
28%
29%
19%
1%
23%
PML-N
4%
22%
29%
29%
15%
1%
26%
PTI
4%
15%
27%
37%
18%
1%
19%
PPP
6%
12%
30%
39%
13%
0%
18%
All others
2%
15%
31%
31%
19%
3%
17%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
280
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 101: Investment Friendliness (Punjab)

No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 6%
Don't
know, 36%
Good, 38%
Very
Bad, 7%
Bad, 12%

281
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 108: Investment Friendliness (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
38%
12%
7%
36%
2%
44%
Male
7%
48%
14%
9%
21%
1%
55%
Female
4%
27%
9%
5%
52%
2%
31%
Young (Under 30)
7%
40%
12%
7%
33%
2%
47%
Middle (30-50)
5%
37%
12%
7%
37%
2%
42%
Old (50+)
6%
36%
11%
6%
39%
2%
42%
Low
7%
34%
12%
6%
39%
2%
41%
Medium
3%
36%
13%
9%
37%
2%
39%
High
7%
49%
11%
6%
27%
1%
56%
Don't Know
4%
37%
10%
8%
39%
2%
41%
No Answer
3%
19%
22%
19%
36%
0%
22%
Urban
6%
44%
13%
7%
28%
2%
50%
Rural
6%
34%
11%
7%
40%
2%
40%
PML-N
6%
39%
11%
6%
36%
1%
45%
PTI
2%
37%
19%
10%
32%
0%
39%
PPP
10%
27%
14%
7%
39%
2%
37%
All others
5%
35%
12%
8%
36%
4%
40%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
282
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 102: Tax Collection (Punjab)

No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 4%
Don't
know, 29%
Good, 31%
Very
Bad, 14%
Bad, 20%

283
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 109: Tax Collection (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
31%
20%
14%
29%
3%
35%
Male
4%
36%
21%
17%
20%
2%
40%
Female
4%
25%
18%
12%
38%
4%
29%
Young (Under 30)
3%
33%
22%
13%
27%
2%
36%
Middle (30-50)
4%
31%
19%
15%
28%
3%
35%
Old (50+)
4%
26%
19%
13%
33%
5%
30%
Low
5%
30%
17%
12%
30%
5%
35%
Medium
4%
36%
19%
14%
25%
2%
40%
High
2%
32%
28%
17%
20%
1%
34%
Don't Know
1%
20%
15%
15%
48%
2%
21%
No Answer
0%
25%
14%
33%
25%
3%
25%
Urban
3%
30%
28%
19%
18%
2%
33%
Rural
4%
31%
16%
12%
34%
3%
35%
PML-N
5%
33%
19%
12%
29%
3%
38%
PTI
2%
19%
22%
28%
26%
4%
21%
PPP
2%
20%
19%
20%
33%
5%
22%
All others
3%
28%
23%
15%
29%
3%
31%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
284
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 103: Utility Bills Collection (Punjab)

Don't
know, 10%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 7%
Very
Bad, 11%
Bad, 18%
Good, 53%

285
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 110: Utility Bills Collection (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
53%
18%
11%
10%
1%
60%
Male
7%
58%
18%
12%
5%
0%
65%
Female
7%
47%
18%
11%
16%
2%
54%
Young (Under 30)
8%
52%
19%
11%
10%
1%
60%
Middle (30-50)
6%
54%
18%
11%
10%
1%
60%
Old (50+)
7%
51%
18%
11%
12%
1%
58%
Low
8%
51%
16%
12%
13%
1%
59%
Medium
7%
60%
17%
10%
6%
1%
67%
High
7%
54%
23%
9%
8%
1%
61%
Don't Know
4%
45%
25%
12%
14%
0%
49%
No Answer
3%
40%
14%
31%
9%
3%
43%
Urban
6%
59%
21%
8%
6%
1%
65%
Rural
7%
50%
17%
13%
13%
1%
57%
PML-N
7%
57%
16%
9%
11%
1%
64%
PTI
8%
40%
24%
19%
10%
0%
48%
PPP
6%
39%
26%
19%
10%
0%
45%
All others
5%
47%
23%
15%
9%
2%
52%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
286
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 104: Management of Unemployment (Punjab)

Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 21%
Very
Bad, 36%
Bad, 35%

287
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 111: Management of Unemployment (Punjab)

Question: The current Provincial Government of your Province has been in power for almost two years.
Regarding reduction in unemployment, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
21%
35%
36%
3%
1%
25%
Male
4%
20%
35%
38%
2%
0%
24%
Female
4%
23%
35%
33%
4%
1%
27%
Young (Under 30)
4%
22%
35%
36%
4%
0%
26%
Middle (30-50)
5%
22%
34%
36%
2%
1%
27%
Old (50+)
3%
18%
39%
34%
4%
2%
21%
Low
4%
22%
35%
34%
3%
1%
26%
Medium
4%
21%
32%
41%
2%
0%
25%
High
4%
22%
37%
35%
2%
0%
26%
Don't Know
5%
17%
41%
32%
6%
1%
22%
No Answer
3%
19%
22%
47%
8%
0%
22%
Urban
3%
18%
41%
36%
2%
0%
21%
Rural
4%
23%
33%
36%
4%
1%
27%
PML-N
5%
24%
36%
33%
3%
1%
29%
PTI
5%
11%
34%
47%
4%
0%
16%
PPP
5%
8%
35%
49%
2%
1%
13%
All others
1%
20%
36%
38%
4%
1%
21%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
288
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 105: Development Programmes (Punjab)

execution) of development projects, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 13%
Don't
know, 25%
Very
Bad, 8%
Good, 38%
Bad, 14%

289
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 112: Development Programmes (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
13%
38%
14%
8%
25%
2%
51%
Male
16%
37%
14%
10%
21%
2%
53%
Female
10%
39%
13%
6%
29%
3%
49%
Young (Under 30)
13%
40%
15%
7%
23%
2%
53%
Middle (30-50)
12%
40%
14%
8%
25%
2%
52%
Old (50+)
14%
32%
12%
9%
30%
3%
46%
Low
12%
31%
18%
10%
27%
3%
43%
Medium
10%
49%
11%
6%
21%
3%
59%
High
20%
51%
9%
4%
15%
0%
71%
Don't Know
10%
28%
9%
9%
43%
1%
38%
No Answer
0%
28%
8%
25%
36%
3%
28%
Urban
15%
50%
13%
5%
15%
2%
55%
Rural
11%
33%
14%
10%
30%
3%
44%
PML-N
15%
39%
14%
7%
24%
2%
54%
PTI
9%
35%
17%
13%
25%
1%
44%
PPP
10%
24%
11%
12%
38%
6%
34%
All others
7%
39%
14%
11%
26%
3%
46%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
290
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 106: Quality & Independence of Civil Service (Punjab)

very bad till now?
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 19%
Don't
know, 47%
Bad, 19%
Very
Bad, 10%

291
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 113: Quality & Independence of Civil Service (Punjab)

very bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
Very
Bad
4
3%
19%
19%
10%
47%
2%
22%
Male
3%
24%
23%
13%
36%
2%
27%
Female
4%
14%
14%
6%
59%
3%
18%
Young (Under 30)
4%
22%
20%
9%
43%
2%
26%
Middle (30-50)
3%
19%
18%
10%
48%
3%
22%
Old (50+)
3%
17%
17%
10%
51%
2%
20%
Low
5%
18%
18%
10%
46%
3%
23%
Medium
1%
17%
19%
10%
49%
4%
18%
High
2%
28%
25%
6%
39%
1%
30%
Don't Know
3%
13%
9%
11%
62%
2%
16%
No Answer
3%
8%
14%
25%
50%
0%
11%
Urban
3%
21%
28%
9%
37%
2%
24%
Rural
4%
18%
14%
10%
52%
3%
22%
PML-N
3%
21%
18%
9%
47%
2%
24%
PTI
5%
12%
26%
15%
41%
2%
17%
PPP
4%
17%
13%
10%
51%
6%
21%
All others
3%
15%
18%
11%
48%
5%
18%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
7 = (1+2)
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
292
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 107: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Punjab)

No
Don't
Answer, 2%
know, 12%
Very
Good, 7%
Very
Bad, 20%
Good, 32%
Bad, 26%

293
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 114: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
32%
26%
20%
12%
2%
39%
Male
7%
31%
28%
22%
10%
2%
38%
Female
8%
33%
24%
18%
15%
2%
41%
Young (Under 30)
7%
29%
30%
22%
11%
1%
36%
Middle (30-50)
8%
34%
24%
19%
12%
2%
42%
Old (50+)
6%
31%
27%
19%
15%
3%
37%
Low
8%
30%
27%
19%
14%
3%
38%
Medium
10%
41%
21%
18%
10%
1%
51%
High
3%
34%
33%
19%
9%
1%
37%
Don't Know
10%
26%
25%
25%
13%
1%
36%
No Answer
6%
19%
8%
39%
25%
3%
25%
Urban
5%
35%
33%
18%
7%
2%
40%
Rural
9%
31%
23%
21%
15%
2%
40%
PML-N
8%
33%
26%
19%
12%
2%
41%
PTI
2%
29%
31%
24%
12%
2%
31%
PPP
8%
30%
29%
19%
14%
0%
38%
All others
7%
31%
26%
20%
15%
2%
38%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
294
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 108: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Punjab)

No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 21%
Don't
know, 49%
Bad, 15%
Very
Bad, 8%

295
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 115: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
21%
15%
8%
49%
4%
24%
Male
3%
23%
16%
10%
44%
3%
26%
Female
3%
19%
13%
7%
54%
4%
22%
Young (Under 30)
3%
26%
16%
7%
45%
3%
29%
Middle (30-50)
4%
20%
14%
9%
49%
4%
24%
Old (50+)
2%
19%
12%
8%
55%
4%
21%
Low
4%
18%
15%
8%
49%
5%
22%
Medium
1%
25%
14%
10%
47%
4%
26%
High
3%
30%
17%
5%
43%
2%
33%
Don't Know
4%
14%
10%
11%
60%
1%
18%
No Answer
3%
11%
3%
19%
58%
6%
14%
Urban
3%
28%
14%
7%
45%
3%
31%
Rural
3%
18%
15%
9%
51%
4%
21%
PML-N
3%
22%
14%
7%
51%
3%
25%
PTI
2%
15%
23%
9%
47%
5%
17%
PPP
4%
12%
10%
11%
57%
7%
16%
All others
4%
24%
15%
13%
40%
5%
28%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
296
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 109: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Punjab)

No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 10%
Don't
know, 34%
Good, 42%
Very
Bad, 4%
Bad, 8%

297
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 116: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
10%
42%
8%
4%
34%
3%
52%
Male
13%
39%
9%
5%
31%
3%
52%
Female
7%
45%
7%
2%
37%
3%
52%
Young (Under 30)
10%
44%
10%
5%
28%
3%
54%
Middle (30-50)
10%
43%
7%
4%
34%
3%
53%
Old (50+)
11%
36%
8%
2%
41%
3%
47%
Low
9%
38%
9%
4%
35%
5%
47%
Medium
13%
50%
8%
3%
24%
2%
63%
High
11%
54%
7%
2%
24%
1%
65%
Don't Know
8%
26%
5%
3%
57%
1%
34%
No Answer
6%
17%
0%
11%
67%
0%
23%
Urban
10%
58%
8%
3%
19%
3%
68%
Rural
10%
35%
8%
4%
40%
3%
45%
PML-N
10%
44%
7%
3%
33%
2%
54%
PTI
7%
38%
9%
8%
33%
5%
45%
PPP
12%
33%
12%
2%
35%
6%
45%
All others
9%
38%
9%
5%
35%
4%
47%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
Methodology:Sample Size: 1778; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 June 12, 2015.
or 101).
298
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 110: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Punjab)

No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 15%
Very
Good, 5%
Very
Bad, 17%
Good, 36%
Bad, 26%

299
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 117: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
36%
26%
17%
15%
1%
41%
Male
5%
31%
28%
24%
12%
1%
36%
Female
5%
41%
24%
9%
19%
1%
46%
Young (Under 30)
6%
40%
22%
16%
16%
1%
46%
Middle (30-50)
6%
36%
26%
17%
15%
1%
42%
Old (50+)
3%
31%
33%
17%
15%
1%
34%
Low
6%
36%
26%
17%
14%
1%
42%
Medium
6%
36%
25%
15%
18%
1%
42%
High
3%
41%
25%
16%
14%
0%
44%
Don't Know
5%
32%
33%
15%
14%
1%
37%
No Answer
3%
17%
14%
42%
22%
3%
20%
Urban
3%
43%
24%
10%
19%
2%
46%
Rural
6%
33%
27%
20%
14%
1%
39%
PML-N
5%
37%
27%
16%
14%
1%
42%
PTI
5%
31%
26%
19%
17%
2%
36%
PPP
7%
33%
26%
17%
17%
0%
40%
All others
6%
34%
24%
18%
17%
2%
40%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
300
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 111: Environmental Sustainability (Punjab)

Don't
know, 11%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 29%
Very
Bad, 20%
Bad, 35%

301
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 118: Environmental Sustainability (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
29%
35%
20%
11%
1%
32%
Male
2%
29%
35%
24%
9%
1%
31%
Female
4%
29%
36%
17%
14%
1%
33%
Young (Under 30)
3%
30%
38%
20%
8%
1%
33%
Middle (30-50)
3%
29%
34%
21%
11%
1%
32%
Old (50+)
3%
26%
35%
19%
16%
2%
29%
Low
4%
28%
31%
20%
14%
2%
32%
Medium
2%
27%
41%
21%
8%
1%
29%
High
2%
33%
43%
18%
4%
0%
35%
Don't Know
3%
26%
30%
18%
23%
1%
29%
No Answer
0%
33%
19%
39%
8%
0%
33%
Urban
2%
34%
39%
18%
6%
1%
36%
Rural
3%
26%
34%
21%
14%
1%
29%
PML-N
3%
33%
34%
17%
12%
2%
36%
PTI
3%
18%
44%
26%
8%
1%
21%
PPP
6%
18%
37%
18%
19%
2%
24%
All others
3%
19%
39%
29%
10%
0%
22%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
302
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 112: Disaster Preparedness & Management (Punjab)

bad till now?
Don't
know, 17%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 9%
Very
Bad, 14%
Good, 34%
Bad, 24%

303
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 119: Disaster Preparedness & Management (Punjab)

bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
34%
24%
14%
17%
2%
43%
Male
10%
34%
21%
15%
19%
2%
44%
Female
8%
33%
28%
14%
16%
2%
41%
Young (Under 30)
10%
34%
22%
16%
15%
3%
44%
Middle (30-50)
9%
34%
24%
15%
16%
2%
43%
Old (50+)
7%
33%
26%
11%
21%
2%
40%
Low
8%
32%
23%
14%
18%
4%
40%
Medium
8%
36%
25%
15%
15%
1%
44%
High
11%
40%
27%
13%
11%
0%
51%
Don't Know
10%
29%
21%
12%
29%
1%
39%
No Answer
11%
23%
11%
29%
23%
3%
34%
Urban
8%
34%
31%
13%
13%
2%
42%
Rural
9%
34%
21%
15%
19%
3%
43%
PML-N
10%
36%
24%
12%
16%
2%
46%
PTI
3%
29%
30%
19%
16%
3%
32%
PPP
8%
29%
20%
17%
25%
1%
37%
All others
6%
30%
22%
21%
19%
3%
36%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
304
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 113: Immunization of Children (Punjab)

Bad, 5%
Very
Bad, 2%
Don't
know, 2%
Very
Good, 48%
Good, 43%

305
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 120: Immunization of Children (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
48%
43%
5%
2%
2%
0%
91%
Male
46%
43%
8%
2%
1%
0%
89%
Female
50%
43%
3%
1%
3%
1%
93%
Young (Under 30)
52%
38%
6%
2%
2%
0%
90%
Middle (30-50)
46%
45%
5%
2%
1%
0%
91%
Old (50+)
46%
45%
4%
2%
3%
0%
91%
Low
42%
45%
8%
2%
3%
0%
87%
Medium
49%
44%
4%
2%
1%
1%
93%
High
56%
40%
3%
1%
0%
0%
96%
Don't Know
51%
41%
3%
2%
3%
0%
92%
No Answer
64%
28%
0%
3%
6%
0%
92%
Urban
49%
43%
5%
1%
1%
Rural
47%
43%
5%
2%
2%
0%
90%
PML-N
52%
41%
4%
1%
2%
0%
93%
PTI
39%
45%
8%
7%
1%
0%
84%
PPP
37%
43%
11%
4%
5%
1%
80%
All others
39%
51%
7%
2%
3%
0%
90%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
92%
Notes:
or 101).
306
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 114: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers - Establishmentof Local Governments
(Punjab)
No
Answer, 6%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 49%
Bad, 13%
Very
Bad, 7%

307
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 121: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers - Establishment of Local Governments
(Punjab)
establishment of Local Governments has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now? Figures are row percentages
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
23%
13%
7%
49%
6%
26%
Male
3%
26%
17%
10%
40%
5%
29%
Female
4%
20%
9%
3%
58%
6%
24%
Young (Under 30)
4%
28%
13%
6%
44%
5%
32%
Middle (30-50)
4%
21%
13%
8%
49%
6%
25%
Old (50+)
3%
23%
13%
6%
51%
5%
26%
Low
4%
20%
16%
7%
47%
6%
24%
Medium
1%
24%
10%
7%
51%
7%
25%
High
4%
29%
15%
5%
43%
4%
33%
Don't Know
4%
24%
6%
7%
57%
2%
28%
No Answer
3%
19%
3%
8%
61%
6%
22%
Urban
2%
23%
18%
6%
45%
6%
25%
Rural
4%
22%
11%
7%
51%
6%
26%
PML-N
4%
23%
11%
5%
51%
5%
27%
PTI
2%
21%
18%
13%
41%
6%
23%
PPP
4%
27%
11%
6%
49%
4%
31%
All others
3%
23%
18%
9%
42%
6%
26%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
308
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 115: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Distribution of Resources to

Provincial and Local Governments (Punjab)
till now?
No
Answer, 5 %
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 20%
Don't
know, 48%
Bad, 17%
Very
Bad, 7%

309
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015

Provincial and Local Governments (Punjab)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
20%
17%
7%
48%
5%
24%
Male
3%
23%
18%
11%
41%
5%
26%
Female
5%
17%
17%
3%
54%
6%
22%
Young (Under 30)
6%
22%
17%
6%
44%
6%
28%
Middle (30-50)
4%
19%
16%
8%
48%
5%
23%
Old (50+)
2%
18%
20%
5%
51%
4%
20%
Low
5%
17%
19%
7%
46%
6%
22%
Medium
4%
17%
16%
7%
50%
6%
21%
High
3%
30%
16%
5%
43%
4%
33%
Don't Know
5%
17%
11%
9%
56%
2%
22%
No Answer
6%
8%
14%
14%
58%
0%
14%
Urban
3%
26%
20%
6%
42%
4%
29%
Rural
5%
17%
16%
8%
50%
6%
22%
PML-N
4%
21%
16%
6%
48%
6%
25%
PTI
2%
16%
17%
15%
49%
2%
18%
PPP
5%
14%
21%
10%
46%
4%
19%
All others
4%
18%
19%
8%
45%
5%
22%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
310
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 116: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Effective Devolution of Power (Punjab)
No
Answer, 6%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 17%
Bad, 10%
Don't
know, 59%
Very Bad, 4%

311
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 123: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Effective Devolution of Power
(Punjab)
Very
Good
1
4%
Good
Bad
3
10%
Very
Bad
4
4%
Don't
Know
5
59%
No
Answer
6
6%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2
17%
Male
4%
21%
14%
6%
50%
6%
25%
Female
4%
14%
6%
3%
68%
6%
18%
Young (Under 30)
4%
19%
12%
4%
55%
6%
23%
Middle (30-50)
4%
16%
9%
5%
60%
6%
20%
Old (50+)
4%
17%
11%
2%
62%
6%
21%
Low
5%
14%
11%
5%
59%
7%
19%
Medium
2%
17%
9%
4%
60%
9%
19%
High
3%
23%
11%
3%
56%
3%
26%
Don't Know
4%
19%
7%
5%
63%
1%
23%
No Answer
3%
17%
6%
8%
64%
3%
20%
Urban
4%
19%
13%
3%
54%
7%
23%
Rural
4%
16%
9%
5%
62%
5%
20%
PML-N
4%
18%
9%
3%
61%
6%
22%
PTI
1%
13%
14%
12%
60%
2%
14%
PPP
5%
13%
7%
8%
58%
8%
18%
All others
4%
16%
14%
5%
53%
8%
20%

Over Punjab
21%
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
312
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 117: Access to Efficient Justice System (Punjab)

till now?
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 6%
Don't
know, 35%
Good, 33%
Very
Bad, 10%
Bad, 16%

313
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 124: Access to Efficient Justice System (Punjab)

till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
33%
16%
10%
35%
2%
39%
Male
4%
38%
18%
12%
27%
2%
42%
Female
7%
28%
13%
8%
43%
1%
35%
Young (Under 30)
5%
37%
15%
9%
33%
1%
42%
Middle (30-50)
6%
32%
16%
10%
35%
2%
38%
Old (50+)
6%
31%
16%
9%
37%
2%
37%
Low
6%
29%
16%
10%
36%
2%
35%
Medium
5%
36%
15%
10%
34%
1%
41%
High
7%
45%
16%
7%
24%
1%
52%
Don't Know
4%
22%
15%
10%
50%
0%
26%
No Answer
3%
19%
14%
14%
47%
3%
22%
Urban
4%
42%
15%
9%
30%
1%
46%
Rural
6%
29%
16%
10%
37%
2%
35%
PML-N
6%
35%
15%
9%
35%
2%
41%
PTI
5%
25%
18%
21%
30%
2%
30%
PPP
8%
27%
14%
5%
44%
1%
35%
All others
5%
31%
18%
10%
35%
2%
36%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
314
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 118: Public Transport (Punjab)

No
Don't
Answer,
1%
know, 5%
Very
Bad, 12%
Very
Good, 15%
Bad, 22%
Good, 46%

315
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 125: Public Transport (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
15%
46%
22%
12%
5%
1%
61%
Male
11%
46%
23%
17%
3%
1%
57%
Female
19%
46%
20%
7%
8%
1%
65%
Young (Under 30)
15%
51%
18%
12%
4%
1%
66%
Middle (30-50)
16%
44%
23%
12%
5%
1%
60%
Old (50+)
15%
44%
23%
11%
8%
0%
59%
Low
12%
44%
25%
13%
6%
1%
56%
Medium
10%
52%
25%
10%
2%
1%
62%
High
31%
45%
13%
9%
3%
0%
76%
Don't Know
14%
50%
14%
13%
9%
1%
64%
No Answer
8%
19%
25%
31%
17%
0%
27%
Urban
24%
49%
15%
8%
3%
1%
73%
Rural
11%
45%
24%
13%
6%
1%
56%
PML-N
17%
46%
21%
11%
4%
1%
63%
PTI
12%
37%
21%
23%
6%
1%
49%
PPP
19%
36%
28%
13%
2%
1%
55%
All others
9%
50%
23%
9%
7%
1%
59%

Over Punjab
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
316
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 119: Access to Safe Drinking Water (Punjab)

Don't
know, 2%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 8%
Very
Bad, 18%
Good, 36%
Bad, 35%

317
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 126: Access to Safe Drinking Water (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
8%
36%
35%
18%
2%
1%
44%
Male
9%
30%
37%
22%
2%
1%
39%
Female
7%
41%
34%
13%
3%
1%
48%
Young (Under 30)
11%
32%
36%
18%
3%
1%
43%
Middle (30-50)
8%
37%
35%
18%
2%
1%
45%
Old (50+)
7%
36%
36%
18%
3%
0%
43%
Low
7%
35%
32%
21%
3%
2%
42%
Medium
6%
31%
46%
14%
2%
0%
37%
High
13%
40%
38%
9%
1%
0%
53%
Don't Know
7%
42%
25%
24%
2%
0%
49%
No Answer
8%
17%
25%
42%
8%
0%
25%
Urban
12%
42%
32%
13%
1%
0%
54%
Rural
7%
33%
37%
20%
3%
1%
40%
PML-N
9%
39%
34%
15%
2%
1%
48%
PTI
6%
35%
28%
28%
2%
41%
PPP
10%
32%
36%
18%
4%
0%
1%
All others
7%
23%
43%
23%
3%
1%
30%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
42%
Notes:
or 101).
318
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 120: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Punjab)
Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 5%
Very
Bad, 27%
Good, 30%
Bad, 35%

319
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 127: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Punjab)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
30%
35%
27%
3%
1%
35%
Male
5%
29%
35%
29%
2%
0%
34%
Female
4%
32%
34%
26%
3%
1%
36%
Young (Under 30)
5%
27%
35%
29%
3%
1%
32%
Middle (30-50)
5%
33%
33%
26%
2%
0%
38%
Old (50+)
4%
28%
37%
28%
3%
1%
32%
Low
4%
28%
35%
29%
3%
1%
32%
Medium
3%
30%
39%
26%
2%
0%
33%
High
8%
39%
30%
22%
1%
0%
47%
Don't Know
2%
29%
35%
29%
5%
1%
31%
No Answer
3%
22%
17%
56%
3%
0%
25%
Urban
4%
44%
29%
22%
1%
0%
48%
Rural
5%
25%
37%
30%
4%
1%
30%
PML-N
5%
33%
35%
25%
3%
0%
38%
PTI
5%
24%
38%
31%
2%
1%
29%
PPP
7%
33%
29%
25%
5%
1%
40%
All others
3%
24%
35%
36%
2%
0%
27%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
or 101).
320
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 121: Water Resources Development and Management (Punjab)

No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 16%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 35%
Very
Bad, 15%
Bad, 27%

321
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 128: Water Resources Development and Management (Punjab)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
35%
27%
15%
16%
1%
40%
Male
6%
38%
26%
17%
12%
1%
44%
Female
5%
33%
28%
14%
21%
1%
38%
Young (Under 30)
5%
38%
25%
14%
18%
1%
43%
Middle (30-50)
6%
35%
27%
16%
15%
1%
41%
Old (50+)
5%
32%
29%
15%
18%
0%
37%
Low
5%
31%
27%
19%
17%
1%
36%
Medium
5%
38%
30%
12%
14%
0%
43%
High
7%
43%
27%
9%
15%
0%
50%
Don't Know
3%
34%
24%
16%
21%
1%
37%
No Answer
3%
36%
6%
42%
14%
0%
39%
Urban
5%
43%
23%
10%
19%
0%
48%
Rural
5%
32%
29%
18%
15%
1%
37%
PML-N
5%
37%
27%
14%
17%
1%
42%
PTI
8%
26%
28%
21%
15%
2%
34%
PPP
8%
31%
26%
17%
14%
4%
39%
All others
5%
35%
26%
18%
0%
40%

Over Punjab
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
16%
Notes:
or 101).
322
Quality of Governance Sindh Government

Views of Respondents from All Over Sindh
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 129: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance - Sindh
No.
Indicator
Law and Order
53%
32%
Poverty Alleviation
16%
20%
Education
38%
31%
Healthcare
35%
34%
Transparency
21%
30%
21%
Anti- Corruption
23%
17%
20%
29%
Tax Collection
40%
31%
10
40%
38%
11
12%
24%
12
23%
33%
13
26%
26%
14
Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions
19%
18%
15

Procurements
Inputs
29%
27%
16%
24%
25%
36%
26%
25%
19
22%
28%
20
77%
46%
21

28%
22

Distribution of Resources to Provincial and
Local Governments
26%
23

Effective Devolution of Power
26%
24
34%
25
Public Transport
27%
16
17
18
19%
24%
N/A
N/A
25%
43%
325
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
26
27
28

Water Resource Development and
Management
Public Opinion on Law and Order -53% provide

majority, 81% of the Sindhi respondentsprovided a
therefore 16%.
positive ratings to education under the Provincial
The public Opinion on the effectiveness of health care
approval. On the other hand, a majority 62% of the
Rating in 2015 stood at a minority 21% of the Sindhi
population.
2015
management positively while a majority 72% of the
Sindhi public rated it negatively. The Approval Rating
in 2015 stood at a minority 21% of the public.
Survey results show that only 23% people rated anticorruption efforts as positive while 67% viewed them
326
18%
28%
23%
24%
29%
29%

the public of Sindh.
the Provincial Government stood at 42% of the
respondents in disapproval. The Approval Rating in
2015 came out to be 40% of the population.
therefore a minority; 40% of the Sindhi public.
According to the survey only 12% of the
respondentsgave positive ratings to the management of
unemployment by the Provincial Government while an
outright majority of 84% gave a negative rating. Thus,
the Government's overall Approval Rating in 2015
regarding the handling of unemployment was a
minority 12% of the population of Sindh. The
ProvincialGovernment's rating was the lowest in this
category.
Survey results show that only 23% respondentsrated
Government therefore stands at a minority 23% in
2015.
Only 26% of the public provided a positive rating for
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
the quality & independence of civil service under the

current Government while a majority 52% provided a
therefore 26% in 2015.
public was not in approval of the system of merit-based
hiring by the Provincial Government. Only 19% of the
public gave a positive rating while 75% gave a negative
rating.
Rating in 2015
According to the survey a minority 16% of the public
gave positive ratings to the clean, efficient and
economic public procurements while 54% gave a
negative rating. Thus the Approval Rating in 2015 of
16% of the Sindhi public was one of the lowest.
minority; 29% of the public.
in 2015
supply of agricultural inputs by the
ProvincialGovernment. Meanwhile, 60% people rated
it negatively.
positively at a minority 26% negatively at 67% of the
population of the province. Thus, a majority of Sindhis
disapproved of the work of the Provincial Government
for their environment.
2015

the respondents rated immunization of children
positively, making it the highest ranked indicator of the
Provincial Government.
public. 44% of the population's views were negative on
and the distribution of resources to Local
Governments, the overall Approval Rating in 2015
came out to be 26% of the public. 42% of the
respondents' views were negative on the performance
of the Government for this indicator.
Lower Tiers: Effective Devolution of Power- 26%
system is 34% of the public in approval, while 36%
rated it negatively.
The Government received positive ratings from only
27% of the respondents for its performance regarding
public transport, while 66% of the respondents gave
negative ratings. The Approval Rating in 2015 stands at
just 27% of the people of the province.
327
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
access to safe drinking water, a minority 18% of the

respondents gave a positive rating while a majority
77% was of a negative opinion. The Approval Rating in
2015 is therefore just18% of the population of the
province.
23% of the respondents gave positive ratings while an
outright majority of 71% gave negative ratings to the

in 2015
328
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 122: Law & Order (Sindh)

Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 6%
Very
Bad, 12%
Good, 47%
Bad, 30%

Sample Size: 754 Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June02 June 12 2015. Estimated error
margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence level
329
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 130: Law & Order (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
6%
47%
30%
12%
5%
1%
53%
Male
7%
50%
30%
9%
3%
1%
57%
Female
5%
45%
30%
14%
6%
1%
50%
Young (Under 30)
8%
42%
29%
14%
7%
1%
50%
Middle (30-50)
5%
50%
29%
11%
3%
1%
55%
Old (50+)
3%
47%
34%
11%
6%
0%
50%
Low
8%
49%
23%
15%
6%
1%
57%
Medium
5%
48%
33%
9%
5%
1%
53%
High
5%
45%
36%
10%
3%
1%
50%
Don't Know
0%
30%
57%
11%
3%
0%
30%
No Answer
0%
54%
31%
4%
4%
6%
54%
Urban
7%
49%
32%
8%
4%
1%
56%
Rural
4%
46%
28%
16%
5%
1%
50%
PML-N
10%
57%
26%
4%
4%
0%
67%
PTI
6%
53%
33%
6%
2%
0%
59%
PPP
5%
42%
30%
14%
8%
2%
47%
All others
6%
51%
30%
11%
2%
0%
57%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
Income codes: Low: Up to Rs. 14000 (In 2014 this represented the lowest quintile). Medium: Rs. 14,001 to 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 2nd and 3rd Quintile).
High: More than 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 4th and 5th Quintiles)
Location:Urban is defined as location defined as town or city in the census, the total in Pakistan being 470 constituting 35% of the population; Rural is defined as a
population living in villages as in the latest census, approximating ~45,000, consisting 65% of the population.
Methodology:Sample Size: 754; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015. Estimated error
1. PERCENTAGES have been rounded off to nearest whole number. As a result the total can sometimes be at slight variation from 100 (for example 99 or 101
330
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 123: Poverty Alleviation (Sindh)

Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 14%
Very
Bad, 47%
Bad, 34%

331
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 131: Poverty Alleviation (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
14%
34%
47%
3%
1%
16%
Male
3%
17%
39%
39%
2%
1%
20%
Female
1%
12%
29%
55%
3%
1%
13%
Young (Under 30)
1%
14%
34%
48%
2%
2%
15%
Middle (30-50)
2%
16%
35%
44%
3%
0%
18%
Old (50+)
1%
8%
32%
56%
3%
0%
9%
Low
3%
15%
33%
46%
4%
1%
18%
Medium
2%
14%
34%
49%
1%
0%
16%
High
1%
8%
40%
49%
2%
1%
9%
Don't Know
0%
0%
22%
76%
0%
3%
0%
No Answer
0%
42%
25%
23%
8%
2%
42%
Urban
1%
11%
33%
51%
2%
1%
12%
Rural
2%
18%
34%
42%
4%
1%
20%
PML-N
0%
24%
26%
49%
2%
0%
24%
PTI
0%
10%
33%
55%
2%
0%
10%
PPP
3%
20%
35%
36%
5%
2%
23%
All others
1%
8%
34%
57%
1%
0%
9%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
332
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 124: Education (Sindh)

No
Answer, 1%
Don't
know, 2%
Very
Good, 3%
Very
Bad, 25%
Good, 35%
Bad, 35%

333
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 132: Education (Sindh)

Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
35%
25%
2%
1%
38%
33%
40%
23%
2%
1%
34%
5%
37%
29%
27%
2%
1%
42%
Young (Under 30)
5%
31%
37%
23%
3%
1%
36%
Middle (30-50)
2%
38%
33%
25%
2%
1%
40%
Old (50+)
1%
29%
38%
29%
3%
0%
30%
Low
4%
45%
29%
20%
3%
0%
49%
Medium
2%
26%
42%
29%
1%
1%
28%
High
3%
22%
47%
27%
2%
0%
25%
Don't Know
0%
8%
32%
54%
3%
3%
8%
No Answer
0%
56%
21%
21%
0%
2%
56%
Urban
3%
28%
37%
29%
2%
1%
31%
Rural
3%
42%
32%
20%
2%
0%
45%
PML-N
2%
33%
41%
24%
0%
0%
35%
PTI
0%
31%
47%
20%
2%
0%
31%
PPP
3%
47%
28%
20%
2%
1%
50%
All others
3%
24%
40%
31%
2%
0%
27%
Very
Good
1
Good
2
3%
35%
Male
1%
Female

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Bad
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
334
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 125: Healthcare (Sindh)

provision of inexpensive medicines, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 4%
Very
Bad, 25%
Good, 31%
Bad, 37%

335
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 133: Healthcare (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
4%
31%
37%
25%
3%
0%
35%
Male
4%
30%
45%
20%
2%
1%
34%
Female
3%
33%
29%
31%
4%
0%
36%
Young (Under 30)
4%
33%
34%
23%
5%
1%
37%
Middle (30-50)
4%
33%
36%
25%
2%
0%
37%
Old (50+)
1%
24%
44%
29%
3%
0%
25%
Low
6%
34%
37%
21%
2%
1%
40%
Medium
2%
32%
32%
30%
3%
0%
34%
High
2%
18%
50%
28%
2%
0%
20%
Don't Know
0%
16%
24%
54%
5%
0%
16%
No Answer
0%
65%
19%
13%
4%
0%
65%
Urban
3%
25%
37%
31%
4%
1%
28%
Rural
5%
38%
36%
19%
2%
0%
43%
PML-N
4%
35%
33%
26%
2%
0%
39%
PTI
0%
27%
33%
37%
4%
0%
27%
PPP
6%
43%
32%
16%
3%
1%
49%
All others
2%
19%
43%
33%
3%
0%
21%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
336
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 126: Transparency (Sindh)

Performance Report on its website), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 20%
Don't
know, 24%
Very
Bad, 15%
Bad, 36%

337
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 134: Transparency (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
1%
20%
36%
15%
24%
4%
21%
Male
1%
22%
44%
16%
16%
2%
23%
Female
2%
19%
28%
14%
32%
6%
21%
Young (Under 30)
3%
22%
35%
15%
23%
2%
25%
Middle (30-50)
1%
21%
36%
14%
24%
4%
22%
Old (50+)
0%
12%
39%
21%
24%
5%
12%
Low
2%
18%
24%
19%
35%
3%
20%
Medium
1%
23%
45%
11%
17%
4%
24%
High
0%
15%
50%
13%
16%
6%
15%
Don't Know
0%
22%
46%
24%
3%
5%
22%
No Answer
4%
38%
43%
6%
6%
2%
42%
Urban
1%
21%
39%
13%
20%
6%
22%
Rural
2%
19%
33%
17%
28%
1%
21%
PML-N
2%
36%
32%
18%
8%
4%
38%
PTI
0%
14%
33%
12%
35%
6%
14%
PPP
2%
24%
31%
12%
29%
2%
26%
All others
1%
15%
43%
18%
19%
5%
16%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
No
Answer
7 = (1+2)
6
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
338
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 127: Energy Production and Management (Sindh)

Don't
know, 7%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 4%
Good, 17%
Very
Bad, 36%
Bad, 36%

339
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 135: Energy Production and Management (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
4%
17%
36%
36%
7%
1%
21%
Male
5%
17%
44%
28%
5%
1%
22%
Female
2%
17%
28%
43%
8%
1%
19%
Young (Under 30)
4%
20%
36%
34%
5%
2%
24%
Middle (30-50)
4%
18%
36%
34%
7%
1%
22%
Old (50+)
2%
11%
35%
44%
8%
0%
13%
Low
4%
14%
31%
39%
10%
1%
18%
Medium
4%
23%
37%
30%
4%
2%
27%
High
2%
12%
50%
34%
3%
0%
14%
Don't Know
0%
8%
30%
57%
3%
3%
8%
No Answer
2%
40%
32%
21%
2%
2%
42%
Urban
3%
16%
38%
38%
4%
1%
19%
Rural
4%
18%
34%
33%
9%
1%
22%
PML-N
0%
24%
43%
31%
2%
0%
24%
PTI
2%
15%
31%
31%
19%
2%
17%
PPP
6%
21%
32%
31%
8%
2%
27%
All others
1%
13%
40%
42%
3%
1%
14%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
340
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 128: Anti-Corruption (Sindh)

Regarding the eradication or minimization of corruption, and improving the performance of related
institutions such as the Provincial Department for Anti-Corruption, please tell us if the performance of
the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
No
Don't
Answer,
2%
know, 9%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 21%
Very
Bad, 35%
Bad, 32%

341
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 136: Anti-Corruption (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
21%
32%
35%
9%
2%
23%
Male
3%
21%
34%
34%
6%
1%
24%
Female
1%
20%
30%
35%
12%
3%
21%
Young (Under 30)
3%
22%
32%
28%
11%
3%
25%
Middle (30-50)
3%
21%
30%
36%
8%
2%
24%
Old (50+)
0%
14%
39%
40%
7%
0%
14%
Low
3%
18%
25%
36%
16%
2%
21%
Medium
3%
24%
34%
35%
3%
1%
27%
High
1%
18%
41%
37%
3%
1%
19%
Don't Know
0%
14%
57%
27%
0%
3%
14%
No Answer
4%
42%
29%
21%
2%
2%
46%
Urban
2%
21%
36%
34%
5%
3%
23%
Rural
3%
19%
28%
36%
14%
1%
22%
PML-N
6%
24%
33%
31%
6%
0%
30%
PTI
2%
18%
27%
43%
10%
0%
20%
PPP
3%
24%
30%
29%
12%
2%
27%
All others
1%
17%
35%
40%
6%
2%
18%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
342
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 129: Investment Friendliness (Sindh)

No
Answer, 5%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 18%
Don't
know, 25%
Very
Bad, 10%
Bad, 40%

343
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 137: Investment Friendliness (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
18%
40%
10%
25%
5%
20%
Male
3%
23%
46%
9%
16%
4%
26%
Female
1%
14%
35%
10%
35%
6%
15%
Young (Under 30)
2%
18%
44%
11%
21%
4%
20%
Middle (30-50)
2%
19%
39%
10%
26%
4%
21%
Old (50+)
3%
15%
40%
8%
28%
7%
18%
Low
3%
17%
27%
12%
36%
5%
20%
Medium
2%
24%
45%
8%
17%
5%
26%
High
2%
13%
56%
8%
18%
5%
15%
Don't Know
0%
5%
68%
14%
14%
0%
5%
No Answer
0%
29%
48%
6%
13%
4%
29%
Urban
2%
16%
46%
9%
21%
5%
18%
Rural
2%
21%
34%
10%
29%
4%
23%
PML-N
2%
28%
43%
8%
20%
0%
30%
PTI
2%
6%
43%
8%
35%
6%
8%
PPP
3%
24%
33%
9%
26%
5%
27%
All others
1%
13%
47%
11%
23%
5%
14%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
344
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 130: Tax Collection (Sindh)

No
Answer, 5%
Don't
know, 14%
Very
Good, 7%
Good, 33%
Very
Bad, 15%
Bad, 27%

345
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 138: Tax Collection (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
33%
27%
15%
14%
5%
40%
Male
11%
43%
27%
12%
6%
2%
54%
Female
3%
22%
27%
19%
22%
7%
25%
Young (Under 30)
9%
28%
28%
17%
14%
5%
37%
Middle (30-50)
7%
36%
26%
15%
12%
4%
43%
Old (50+)
5%
27%
29%
14%
19%
7%
32%
Low
10%
33%
17%
14%
22%
4%
43%
Medium
4%
33%
35%
15%
7%
5%
37%
High
5%
27%
44%
16%
6%
3%
32%
Don't Know
5%
41%
16%
19%
14%
5%
46%
No Answer
6%
38%
25%
19%
0%
13%
44%
Urban
8%
29%
32%
16%
10%
5%
37%
Rural
6%
37%
21%
14%
18%
4%
43%
PML-N
12%
34%
22%
20%
10%
2%
46%
PTI
4%
42%
29%
13%
10%
2%
46%
PPP
9%
38%
21%
11%
18%
4%
47%
All others
5%
26%
34%
20%
10%
6%
31%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
346
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 131: Utility Bills Collection (Sindh)

Don't
know, 8%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 5%
Very
Bad, 18%
Good, 35%
Bad, 33%

347
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 139: Utility Bills Collection (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
5%
Good
Bad
3
33%
Very
Bad
4
18%
Don't
Know
5
8%
No
Answer
6
1%
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
40%
2
35%
Male
7%
44%
32%
12%
5%
1%
51%
Female
3%
26%
33%
25%
12%
1%
29%
Young (Under 30)
8%
38%
28%
21%
3%
2%
46%
Middle (30-50)
5%
38%
31%
16%
9%
1%
43%
Old (50+)
3%
17%
46%
20%
13%
0%
20%
Low
7%
38%
27%
16%
12%
1%
45%
Medium
4%
34%
34%
19%
7%
1%
38%
High
5%
28%
42%
22%
3%
1%
33%
Don't Know
11%
54%
32%
3%
0%
11%
No Answer
2%
54%
27%
10%
4%
2%
56%
Urban
7%
32%
38%
20%
3%
0%
39%
Rural
3%
38%
27%
16%
14%
2%
41%
PML-N
2%
37%
37%
22%
2%
0%
39%
PTI
8%
27%
29%
16%
18%
2%
35%
PPP
4%
43%
30%
11%
12%
1%
47%
All others
6%
28%
36%
25%
4%
1%
34%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
348
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 132: Management of Unemployment (Sindh)

Don't
know, 3%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 11%
Very
Bad, 47%
Bad, 37%

349
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 140: Management of Unemployment (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
1%
11%
37%
47%
3%
1%
12%
Male
2%
12%
46%
38%
3%
0%
14%
Female
1%
10%
28%
56%
3%
2%
11%
Young (Under 30)
0%
13%
35%
47%
3%
2%
13%
Middle (30-50)
1%
13%
39%
44%
3%
1%
14%
Old (50+)
3%
4%
35%
56%
2%
0%
7%
Low
1%
9%
35%
50%
4%
1%
10%
Medium
2%
13%
41%
42%
2%
1%
15%
High
0%
8%
47%
44%
2%
0%
8%
Don't Know
0%
3%
22%
73%
0%
3%
3%
No Answer
2%
36%
21%
32%
2%
6%
38%
Urban
1%
11%
41%
43%
3%
2%
12%
Rural
1%
12%
32%
51%
3%
1%
13%
PML-N
4%
16%
53%
28%
0%
0%
20%
PTI
0%
8%
53%
37%
0%
2%
8%
PPP
2%
17%
30%
46%
5%
2%
19%
All others
0%
6%
39%
52%
2%
1%
6%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Bad
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
350
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 133: Development Programmes (Sindh)

Don't
know, 15%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 21%
Very Bad, 20%
Bad, 40%

351
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 141: Development Programmes (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
21%
40%
20%
15%
2%
23%
Male
2%
24%
41%
17%
16%
1%
26%
Female
2%
18%
40%
23%
15%
3%
20%
Young (Under 30)
2%
18%
42%
21%
15%
2%
20%
Middle (30-50)
2%
25%
38%
18%
15%
2%
27%
Old (50+)
3%
9%
45%
24%
19%
2%
12%
Low
2%
21%
32%
21%
22%
2%
23%
Medium
2%
28%
37%
20%
13%
1%
30%
High
2%
12%
53%
21%
12%
1%
14%
Don't Know
3%
5%
68%
24%
0%
0%
8%
No Answer
4%
29%
54%
6%
2%
4%
33%
Urban
2%
21%
43%
21%
11%
2%
23%
Rural
2%
21%
37%
18%
20%
2%
23%
PML-N
2%
39%
29%
14%
14%
2%
41%
PTI
2%
12%
41%
22%
20%
2%
14%
PPP
3%
25%
38%
18%
15%
2%
28%
All others
1%
15%
44%
23%
16%
1%
16%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
352
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 134: Quality & Independence of Civil Service (Sindh)

very bad till now?
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 2%
Don't
know, 20%
Good, 24%
Very Bad, 13%
Bad, 39%

353
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 142: Quality & Independence of Civil Service (Sindh)

very bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
24%
39%
13%
20%
2%
26%
Male
4%
26%
41%
12%
16%
1%
30%
Female
0%
23%
36%
13%
25%
4%
23%
Young (Under 30)
1%
27%
43%
9%
19%
2%
28%
Middle (30-50)
3%
26%
35%
14%
20%
2%
29%
Old (50+)
3%
14%
46%
12%
23%
3%
17%
Low
3%
23%
27%
17%
27%
3%
26%
Medium
3%
29%
45%
8%
15%
1%
32%
High
0%
12%
59%
8%
20%
2%
12%
Don't Know
0%
19%
51%
19%
8%
3%
19%
No Answer
0%
54%
27%
6%
6%
6%
54%
Urban
2%
21%
45%
12%
17%
3%
23%
Rural
2%
29%
32%
13%
24%
1%
31%
PML-N
2%
31%
37%
18%
12%
0%
33%
PTI
2%
13%
38%
19%
27%
2%
15%
PPP
4%
29%
32%
11%
23%
2%
33%
All others
0%
21%
46%
13%
18%
3%
21%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
354
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 135: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Sindh)

Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 18%
Very
Bad, 41%
Bad, 34%

355
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 143: Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions (Sindh)

Regarding merit-based recruitment and promotions of Government employees, please tell us if the performance
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
1%
18%
34%
41%
5%
2%
19%
Male
1%
15%
41%
38%
3%
2%
16%
Female
1%
21%
26%
45%
7%
1%
22%
Young (Under 30)
1%
17%
37%
41%
4%
1%
18%
Middle (30-50)
1%
19%
32%
42%
5%
2%
20%
Old (50+)
2%
13%
36%
39%
8%
2%
15%
Low
1%
13%
31%
45%
9%
2%
14%
Medium
1%
19%
38%
38%
3%
1%
20%
High
2%
20%
40%
37%
2%
1%
22%
Don't Know
0%
8%
19%
68%
5%
0%
8%
No Answer
4%
42%
35%
19%
0%
0%
46%
Urban
1%
18%
34%
43%
2%
2%
19%
Rural
1%
17%
34%
39%
9%
1%
18%
PML-N
2%
22%
29%
45%
2%
0%
24%
PTI
0%
4%
31%
50%
15%
0%
4%
PPP
1%
22%
33%
35%
7%
2%
23%
All others
1%
14%
36%
46%
3%
1%
15%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
356
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 136: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Sindh)

No
Answer, 5%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 15%
Don't
know, 25%
Bad, 36%
Very Bad, 18%

357
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 144: Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
1%
15%
36%
18%
25%
5%
16%
Male
1%
15%
42%
14%
24%
3%
16%
Female
1%
16%
28%
22%
26%
7%
17%
Young (Under 30)
1%
15%
34%
19%
23%
8%
16%
Middle (30-50)
1%
16%
37%
17%
24%
4%
17%
Old (50+)
0%
10%
32%
22%
34%
3%
10%
Low
1%
16%
27%
18%
32%
6%
17%
Medium
2%
15%
40%
18%
23%
3%
17%
High
0%
5%
55%
15%
24%
2%
5%
Don't Know
0%
3%
24%
54%
8%
11%
3%
No Answer
2%
54%
25%
8%
6%
4%
56%
Urban
1%
10%
42%
21%
21%
5%
12%
Rural
1%
21%
29%
16%
30%
5%
21%
PML-N
2%
24%
31%
20%
20%
4%
26%
PTI
0%
8%
38%
10%
35%
8%
8%
PPP
2%
23%
29%
17%
26%
3%
25%
All others
0%
7%
42%
20%
24%
6%
7%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
358
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 137: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Sindh)

No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 5%
Don't
know, 24%
Good, 24%
Very
Bad, 10%
Bad, 34%

359
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 140: Use of Technologies for Better Governance (Sindh)

Regarding the effective use of technologies for better governance and to provide trainings to government
employees in the use of new technologies, please tell us if the Provincial Government's performance has been
very good, good, bad or very bad?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
5%
24%
34%
10%
24%
4%
29%
Male
5%
23%
37%
9%
24%
3%
28%
Female
5%
24%
30%
11%
25%
4%
29%
Young (Under 30)
6%
19%
36%
14%
21%
4%
25%
Middle (30-50)
3%
27%
32%
9%
26%
4%
30%
Old (50+)
9%
19%
38%
9%
24%
1%
28%
Low
5%
24%
21%
11%
35%
4%
29%
Medium
7%
26%
39%
9%
16%
2%
33%
High
2%
18%
51%
9%
18%
2%
20%
Don't Know
5%
14%
65%
14%
3%
0%
19%
No Answer
8%
42%
23%
8%
10%
8%
50%
Urban
6%
25%
38%
11%
17%
3%
31%
Rural
4%
22%
29%
9%
33%
4%
26%
PML-N
8%
35%
37%
4%
16%
0%
43%
PTI
0%
23%
46%
6%
21%
4%
23%
PPP
5%
25%
28%
9%
29%
4%
30%
All others
5%
21%
36%
12%
22%
4%
26%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
360
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 138: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Sindh)

No
Answer, 2%
Don't
know, 13%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 23%
Very
Bad, 20%
Bad, 40%

361
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 146: Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
23%
40%
20%
13%
2%
25%
Male
2%
24%
42%
17%
14%
1%
26%
Female
2%
23%
39%
22%
11%
3%
25%
Young (Under 30)
3%
23%
35%
23%
12%
3%
26%
Middle (30-50)
2%
25%
41%
18%
13%
2%
27%
Old (50+)
0%
19%
47%
20%
13%
1%
19%
Low
2%
24%
39%
23%
9%
2%
26%
Medium
1%
25%
38%
18%
17%
2%
26%
High
2%
14%
47%
17%
20%
2%
16%
Don't Know
3%
5%
54%
30%
3%
3%
8%
No Answer
2%
58%
27%
6%
2%
4%
60%
Urban
1%
20%
38%
16%
22%
3%
21%
Rural
3%
27%
43%
24%
3%
1%
30%
PML-N
2%
31%
24%
22%
22%
0%
33%
PTI
0%
12%
57%
10%
16%
4%
12%
PPP
3%
28%
41%
21%
5%
1%
31%
All others
1%
19%
39%
19%
19%
3%
20%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
362
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 139: Environmental Sustainability (Sindh)

Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 24%
Very
Bad, 29%
Bad, 38%

363
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 147: Environmental Sustainability (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
24%
38%
29%
5%
2%
26%
Male
3%
25%
46%
19%
5%
2%
28%
Female
1%
22%
30%
39%
6%
2%
23%
Young (Under 30)
2%
21%
37%
36%
2%
2%
23%
Middle (30-50)
2%
27%
37%
27%
5%
1%
29%
Old (50+)
1%
15%
43%
28%
11%
3%
16%
Low
2%
24%
37%
29%
7%
2%
26%
Medium
3%
25%
37%
28%
6%
1%
28%
High
3%
15%
48%
30%
2%
1%
18%
Don't Know
0%
11%
24%
60%
5%
0%
11%
No Answer
2%
56%
23%
15%
0%
4%
58%
Urban
2%
18%
41%
31%
5%
3%
20%
Rural
2%
31%
35%
27%
6%
0%
33%
PML-N
0%
31%
39%
28%
0%
2%
31%
PTI
2%
31%
47%
14%
6%
0%
33%
PPP
3%
32%
29%
25%
9%
2%
35%
All others
1%
13%
46%
36%
3%
1%
14%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
364
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 140: Disaster Preparedness & Management (Sindh)

bad till now?
No
Answer, 3%
Don't
know, 15%
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 19%
Very
Bad, 27%
Bad, 34%

365
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 148: Disaster Preparedness & Management (Sindh)

bad till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
19%
34%
27%
15%
3%
22%
Male
3%
21%
41%
26%
8%
1%
24%
Female
3%
18%
27%
27%
21%
5%
21%
Young (Under 30)
4%
22%
28%
32%
10%
4%
26%
Middle (30-50)
2%
19%
36%
25%
15%
3%
21%
Old (50+)
4%
13%
36%
24%
20%
3%
17%
Low
2%
20%
28%
29%
18%
3%
22%
Medium
3%
22%
39%
25%
9%
3%
25%
High
3%
9%
52%
33%
2%
2%
12%
Don't Know
5%
0%
16%
22%
49%
8%
5%
No Answer
8%
50%
17%
6%
17%
2%
58%
Urban
4%
14%
40%
28%
11%
4%
18%
Rural
2%
25%
27%
25%
19%
2%
27%
PML-N
2%
26%
26%
39%
4%
4%
28%
PTI
4%
4%
31%
27%
25%
10%
8%
PPP
4%
28%
28%
20%
19%
2%
32%
All others
3%
11%
43%
32%
11%
2%
14%
Respondents form All

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
366
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 141: Immunization of Children (Sindh)

Very Bad, 6%
Don't
know, 2%
Very
Good, 16%
Bad, 14%
Good, 61%

367
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 149: Immunization of Children (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
16%
61%
14%
6%
2%
0%
77%
Male
12%
62%
15%
7%
3%
0%
74%
Female
20%
60%
13%
6%
1%
0%
80%
Young (Under 30)
15%
52%
18%
11%
3%
0%
67%
Middle (30-50)
15%
64%
14%
5%
1%
0%
79%
Old (50+)
21%
64%
10%
3%
2%
0%
85%
Low
17%
55%
16%
9%
3%
0%
72%
Medium
15%
65%
14%
5%
1%
0%
80%
High
18%
71%
8%
3%
1%
0%
89%
Don't Know
19%
70%
3%
8%
0%
0%
89%
No Answer
10%
63%
25%
2%
0%
0%
73%
Urban
19%
69%
7%
3%
2%
0%
88%
Rural
13%
52%
23%
10%
2%
0%
65%
PML-N
18%
65%
8%
8%
2%
0%
83%
PTI
16%
61%
20%
0%
2%
0%
77%
PPP
15%
55%
20%
8%
2%
0%
70%
All others
18%
67%
8%
6%
2%
0%
85%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
368
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 142: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Establishment of Local Governments
(Sindh)
No
Answer, 4%
Don't
know, 25%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 26%
Very
Bad, 13%
Bad, 31%

369
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 150: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Establishment of Local Governments
(Sindh)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
26%
31%
13%
25%
4%
28%
Male
2%
25%
37%
9%
24%
3%
27%
Female
1%
26%
25%
18%
25%
6%
27%
Young (Under 30)
2%
28%
33%
12%
22%
3%
30%
Middle (30-50)
2%
26%
31%
13%
23%
5%
28%
Old (50+)
0%
19%
27%
18%
34%
3%
19%
Low
2%
20%
25%
16%
33%
4%
22%
Medium
1%
28%
36%
10%
20%
4%
29%
High
2%
16%
46%
15%
20%
2%
18%
Don't Know
5%
57%
8%
14%
14%
3%
62%
No Answer
0%
50%
33%
4%
2%
10%
50%
Urban
2%
23%
37%
15%
19%
5%
25%
Rural
1%
28%
24%
11%
31%
4%
29%
PML-N
4%
33%
29%
10%
24%
0%
37%
PTI
0%
16%
33%
8%
35%
8%
16%
PPP
3%
32%
22%
10%
28%
5%
35%
All others
0%
19%
40%
18%
19%
3%
19%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
370
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 143: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Distribution of Resources to Provincial
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 25%
Don't
know, 28%
Very
Bad, 14%
Bad, 28%

371
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015

Provincial and Local Governments (Sindh)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
1%
25%
28%
14%
28%
4%
26%
Male
2%
28%
33%
12%
24%
2%
30%
Female
1%
22%
23%
16%
32%
5%
23%
Young (Under 30)
2%
21%
31%
20%
21%
5%
23%
Middle (30-50)
1%
28%
27%
12%
28%
3%
29%
Old (50+)
0%
17%
26%
13%
41%
3%
17%
Low
1%
24%
21%
17%
32%
5%
25%
Medium
1%
24%
34%
10%
29%
2%
25%
High
2%
13%
45%
14%
27%
0%
15%
Don't Know
3%
43%
8%
19%
24%
3%
46%
No Answer
2%
52%
17%
13%
6%
10%
54%
Urban
1%
19%
35%
13%
27%
5%
20%
Rural
1%
31%
20%
16%
29%
3%
32%
PML-N
0%
31%
37%
14%
16%
2%
31%
PTI
0%
18%
27%
8%
41%
6%
18%
PPP
2%
38%
20%
10%
26%
4%
40%
All others
1%
11%
35%
20%
30%
3%
12%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
372
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 144: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Effective Devolution of Power (Sindh)
Question:Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
No
Answer, 6 %
Very
Good, 3%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 31%
Very
Bad, 9%
Bad, 29%

373
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 152: Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers Effective Devolution of Power (Sindh)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
23%
29%
9%
31%
6%
26%
Male
4%
24%
36%
9%
25%
3%
28%
Female
2%
22%
21%
8%
38%
10%
24%
Young (Under 30)
3%
25%
23%
12%
30%
7%
28%
Middle (30-50)
2%
23%
31%
8%
30%
6%
25%
Old (50+)
3%
17%
30%
7%
38%
6%
20%
Low
4%
18%
25%
11%
35%
7%
22%
Medium
2%
29%
30%
8%
27%
4%
31%
High
2%
20%
44%
5%
24%
5%
22%
Don't Know
3%
14%
14%
3%
61%
6%
17%
No Answer
48%
19%
4%
19%
10%
48%
Urban
3%
22%
32%
8%
28%
7%
25%
Rural
2%
24%
25%
10%
35%
5%
26%
PML-N
6%
31%
39%
8%
12%
4%
37%
PTI
2%
18%
31%
4%
35%
10%
20%
PPP
3%
28%
19%
8%
37%
5%
31%
All others
2%
17%
36%
10%
28%
7%
19%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
374
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 145: Access to Efficient Justice System (Sindh)

please tell us that with regards to making the judicial system effective (such as induction and adequate training
of sufficient state prosecutors, use of new technology for investigation purposes, prompt appointment of judges
till now?
No
Answer, 4%
Very
Good, 3%
Don't
know, 26%
Good, 31%
Very
Bad, 7%
Bad, 29%

375
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 153: Access to Efficient Justice System (Sindh)

till now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
3%
31%
29%
7%
26%
4%
34%
Male
5%
33%
31%
7%
24%
2%
38%
Female
2%
29%
26%
7%
29%
7%
31%
Young (Under 30)
2%
37%
27%
6%
25%
3%
39%
Middle (30-50)
4%
31%
30%
7%
25%
3%
35%
Old (50+)
2%
22%
28%
7%
31%
11%
24%
Low
4%
27%
19%
9%
36%
5%
31%
Medium
3%
36%
34%
6%
19%
4%
39%
High
5%
25%
40%
3%
22%
5%
30%
Don't Know
0%
27%
46%
8%
14%
5%
27%
No Answer
2%
52%
35%
0%
8%
2%
54%
Urban
4%
30%
31%
7%
22%
6%
34%
Rural
2%
32%
26%
7%
30%
3%
34%
PML-N
8%
34%
22%
8%
26%
2%
42%
PTI
0%
25%
27%
10%
33%
6%
25%
PPP
4%
34%
28%
6%
27%
2%
38%
All others
3%
29%
30%
6%
25%
7%
32%
Respondents form All

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
376
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 146: Public Transport (Sindh)

Don't
know, 6%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 25%
Very
Bad, 23%
Bad, 43%

377
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 154:Public Transport (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
25%
43%
23%
6%
1%
27%
Male
1%
19%
44%
30%
5%
1%
20%
Female
3%
32%
42%
15%
7%
1%
35%
Young (Under 30)
2%
24%
42%
23%
8%
1%
26%
Middle (30-50)
3%
25%
43%
23%
6%
1%
28%
Old (50+)
1%
28%
45%
22%
4%
0%
29%
Low
3%
23%
43%
23%
8%
1%
26%
Medium
1%
21%
46%
26%
6%
1%
22%
High
1%
27%
43%
26%
3%
0%
28%
Don't Know
5%
51%
24%
16%
3%
0%
56%
No Answer
4%
31%
50%
4%
6%
4%
35%
Urban
3%
24%
44%
24%
4%
1%
27%
Rural
1%
27%
42%
21%
8%
1%
28%
PML-N
0%
20%
32%
36%
12%
0%
20%
PTI
0%
22%
43%
33%
2%
0%
22%
PPP
2%
29%
41%
16%
10%
2%
32%
All others
3%
22%
47%
26%
1%
0%
25%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
378
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 147: Access to Safe Drinking Water (Sindh)

Don't
know, 4%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 1%
Good, 17%
Very
Bad, 39%
Bad, 38%

379
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 155: Access to Safe Drinking Water (Sindh)

Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
1%
17%
38%
39%
4%
1%
18%
Male
2%
16%
37%
40%
3%
1%
18%
Female
1%
18%
39%
38%
4%
0%
19%
Young (Under 30)
1%
17%
37%
41%
3%
2%
18%
Middle (30-50)
2%
17%
39%
39%
4%
0%
19%
Old (50+)
0%
19%
39%
38%
5%
0%
19%
Low
1%
19%
32%
42%
5%
1%
20%
Medium
2%
15%
39%
43%
1%
1%
17%
High
1%
14%
44%
37%
5%
0%
15%
Don't Know
0%
5%
60%
32%
0%
3%
5%
No Answer
4%
27%
42%
23%
4%
0%
31%
Urban
2%
12%
39%
44%
4%
1%
14%
Rural
1%
23%
38%
34%
4%
1%
24%
PML-N
0%
14%
22%
63%
2%
0%
14%
PTI
0%
20%
27%
47%
4%
2%
20%
PPP
3%
23%
36%
31%
6%
1%
26%
All others
0%
11%
45%
43%
2%
0%
11%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
380
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 148: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Sindh)
Don't
know, 5%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 21%
Very
Bad, 38%
Bad, 33%

381
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 156: Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (Sindh)
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
21%
33%
38%
5%
0%
23%
Male
3%
22%
35%
36%
5%
0%
25%
Female
1%
21%
31%
40%
7%
0%
22%
Young (Under 30)
2%
18%
33%
45%
2%
0%
20%
Middle (30-50)
3%
20%
34%
37%
7%
0%
23%
Old (50+)
1%
34%
28%
31%
7%
0%
35%
Low
4%
18%
32%
36%
10%
0%
22%
Medium
2%
21%
39%
37%
1%
0%
23%
High
1%
32%
31%
34%
2%
1%
33%
Don't Know
0%
11%
19%
70%
0%
0%
11%
No Answer
2%
29%
27%
40%
2%
0%
31%
Urban
3%
23%
35%
38%
1%
1%
26%
Rural
2%
19%
30%
38%
10%
0%
21%
PML-N
4%
24%
28%
45%
0%
0%
28%
PTI
2%
14%
25%
41%
18%
0%
16%
PPP
3%
19%
29%
40%
8%
0%
22%
All others
1%
24%
38%
34%
2%
0%
25%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
382
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 149: Water Resources Development and Management (Sindh)

Don't
know, 14%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 2%
Good, 27%
Very
Bad, 26%
Bad, 30%

383
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 157: Water Resources Development and Management (Sindh)

Question: In your opinion of the Provincial Government's performance during the past two
years, with regards to improvement in the irrigation system, please tell us if the performance
of the Provincial Government of your province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till
now?
Very
Good
1
Good
Bad
3
Very
Bad
4
Don't
Know
5
No
Answer
6
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
2%
27%
30%
26%
14%
2%
29%
Male
2%
24%
31%
24%
18%
2%
26%
Female
1%
31%
29%
28%
9%
2%
32%
Young (Under 30)
1%
33%
28%
18%
18%
2%
34%
Middle (30-50)
2%
27%
31%
27%
11%
2%
29%
Old (50+)
1%
19%
31%
31%
18%
0%
20%
Low
2%
27%
33%
23%
14%
2%
29%
Medium
3%
28%
29%
27%
12%
2%
31%
High
1%
24%
28%
24%
23%
1%
25%
Don't Know
0%
22%
16%
60%
0%
3%
22%
No Answer
0%
46%
29%
19%
2%
4%
46%
Urban
2%
21%
30%
28%
17%
2%
23%
Rural
1%
34%
31%
23%
10%
1%
35%
PML-N
0%
22%
24%
35%
20%
0%
22%
PTI
0%
4%
29%
48%
19%
0%
4%
PPP
2%
36%
27%
23%
9%
3%
38%
All others
1%
22%
35%
24%
17%
1%
23%

Over Sindh
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Location-wise
Notes:
384
Detailed Indicators on
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Comparative Position with respect to Zardari - 59%

believe performance was improved in 2015
When respondents were asked to compare Prime
Minister Nawaz Sharif's Government with that of the
PPP's tenure under President Zardari, the majority;
59% claimed that Nawaz Sharif's Government has
performed better.
Comparative Position with respect to Musharraf 50% believe performance was improved in 2015
While 50% respondents reported that the current
Government is performing better as compared to
Musharraf's regime, 28% assessed the performance as
worse.
Future Possibility - 56% optimistic about
'Improvement of Economy' in 2015
56% of the respondents believe that this Government
has 'A Lot of Chance' to 'Somewhat of a Chance' in
strengthening Pakistan's economy during its tenure. On
the contrary, 32% are more pessimistic on this
assessment, and reported that the current Government
has 'Very Little Chance' to 'No Chance at All' to
improve Pakistan's economy.
'Improvement of Peace and Stability' in 2015
A majority of the respondents expect this Government
to improve the security situation (61%), while a
significant proportion (34%) believe that the
Government has 'Very Little Chance' to 'No Chance' of
achieving this objective.
'Controlling Terrorism' in 2015
41% of the respondents are pessimistic when it comes
to gauging the PML-N Government's ability to rid the
country of terrorism, while 54% are more hopeful and
see the potential in this Government of successfully
eliminating terrorism from the Country.
'Decreasing Unemployment' in 2015
64% of the respondents doubt that the Government can
erase widespread unemployment, while only 32%
remain hopeful about the Government's ability to
generate economic growth required for expanding
employment opportunities.
Future Possibility - 29 % optimistic about 'Poverty
Reduction' in 2015
A substantial 65% of the surveyed public thinks that the
current Government has 'Very Little' to 'No Chance at
All' in alleviating poverty in Pakistan. Only 29%
remain hopeful and believe that the Government will be

able to significantly rectify the issue of poverty in the
Country.
'Improving relations with the United States of
America' in 2015
Less than half the respondents (38%) believe that the
PML-N Government has 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of
Chance' for improving relations with the United States.
However, an equally large proportion of the
respondents (30%) see this Government's as having
'Very Little' to 'No Chance at All' of improving bilateral
relations with the US.
'Improving relations with India' in 2015
While only 29% of the respondets believe that the
Government has a good chance at attaining this
objective, a marginally higher 38% of all respondents
doubt that the efforts at harmonizing relations with
India would bare fruit.
Future Possibility 36% optimistic about
'Improving relations with Afghanistan' in 2015
36% of the respondents believe that the incumbent
Government has a 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of Chance' of
improving relations with the State of Afghanistan.
However, a significant proportion (29%) is of the view
that the Government will be unable to improve
relations with its western neighbour.
Trust in Institutions: National Accountability
Bureau - 30% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
At present, Pakistanis appear uncertain about the NAB.
31% respondents assert that they have 'Little' to 'No
Trust at All' in the National Accountability Bureau,
while 30% report that they have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of
Trust' in the Bureau.
Trust in Institutions: Government Officers - 32%
provide Approval Ratings in 2015
55% of the respondents state that they have 'Little' to
'No Trust' at all in Government officers. Only 32%
respondents state they have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of
Trust' in the country's bureaucrats.
Trust in Institutions: Armed Forces - 75% provide
At present, an overwhelming75% of the respondents
claim to have 'Somewhat' to 'A Lot of Trust' in
Pakistan's Armed Forces. In contrast, only 13% state
that they have 'Little' to 'No Trust at All' in the Armed
Forces.
387
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Trust in Institutions: Police - 32% provide Approval

Ratings in 2015
A substantial 57% of all respondents stated that they
had' Little' to 'No Trust at All' in Pakistan's Police. In
comparison, only 32% of the respondents expressed
trust in the Police force.
Performance of the Prime Minister - 73% provide
While a resounding 73% of the respondents rated his
performance as 'Good' to 'Very Good', only 24% rated
his performance in the last two years as 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad'.
Performance of the Chief Minister of Punjab- 78%
By far the most popular Chief Minister in Pakistan out
of all the provinces, 78% of the respondents rated his
performance as 'Good' to 'Very Good'. Only 14%
respondents rated his performance as 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad'.
Performance of the Chief Minister of Sindh - 29%
A significant 43% of the respondents rated his
performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. Only 29% of the
respondents rated the performance of the Chief
Minister of Sindh's as 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Performance of the Chief Minster of Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa - 38% provide Approval Ratings in
2015
Chief Minister of KP's performance ratings are also in
the negative at this point in time. 29% of the
respondents rated his performance as 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad' while a relatively encouraging 38% evaluated his
performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Performance of the Chief Minister of Balochistan 28% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
A majority of the public gave a negative assessment of
the performance of Chief Minister of Balochistan.
While 28% respondents rated his performance as
'Good' or 'Very Good', 29% rated his performance as
'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Performance of the Provincial Government of
Punjab - 76% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
76% of the respondents rated the Punjab Government's
performance as 'Good' to 'Very Good'. Only 14%
respondents rated the performance of the Government
as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. At this point in time, the Punjab
Government enjoys the healthiest Approval Rating of
388
the four provinces.

Sindh - 30% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The Sindh Government is evaluated negatively by a
relative majority of the respondents from across
Pakistan. A significantly large proportion (43%) of all
respondents rated the Provincial Government's
performance negatively, while only 30% were in
approval of the performance of the Government in
2015.
Balochistan - 28% provide Approval Ratings in
2015
The Balochistan Government is evaluated negatively
by a significant proportion of the respondents from
across Pakistan. 31% of all respondents rated the
Provincial Government's performance negatively,
while only 28% of the public approved of the
performance of the Government.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - 38% provide Approval
Ratings in 2015
The KP Government's performance was also deemed
unsatisfactory by a significant ratio of respondents
across Pakistan. 28% of all respondents rated the
Provincial Government's performance negatively,
while 38% approved of the performance of the
Government.
Performance of the Ministry of Commerce: 47%
The Ministry of Commerce performed decently as an
encouraging 47% of the respondents approved of its
performance in 2015. 24% however negatively rated
the performance of the Ministry.
Performance of the Ministry of Defence: 55%
The Ministry of the Defence was the only Ministry
under the Federal Government whose performance
was approved by a majority of the respondents (55%)
in 2015. Only 21% of the public felt that the
performance of the Defence Ministry was not up to
the mark.
Performance of the Ministry of Finance, Revenue,
Economic Affairs, Statistics and Privatisation:
33% provide Approval Ratings in 2015
The performance of this particular Ministry was
positively rated by a minority of the respondents
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
as less than fifty percent of the public (33%) voted

the performance as 'Very Good' or 'Good' in 2015. On
the other hand, 32% Pakistanis rated the performance
of the Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic
Affairs, Statistics and Privatisation as 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad'.
Performance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs was positively voted
by less than half of the respondents as only 37%
Pakistanis rated the Ministry's performance as 'Good'
or 'Very Good'. On the other hand, 27% Pakistanis
perceived the performance of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs to be 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Performance of the Ministry of Information,
Broadcasting and National Heritage: 41% provide
The Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and
National Heritage did comparatively better as 41% of
the respondents approved of the performance of this
Ministry in 2015. With added effort, the Approval
Ratings for this Ministry have the potential to outpace
the fifty percent mark and resultantly gain the approval
of the majority of Pakistanis. As it stands, 25% of the
public has voted the performance of this Ministry as
'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
Performance of the Ministry of Information
Technology and Telecommunication: 45% provide
The Ministry of Information Technology and
Telecommunication also performed well as a
significant proportion of the respondents (45%) gave
approval in 2015, only a few percentage points behind
the majority approval mark of fifty percent.
Conversely, only 21% respondents gave negative
reviews over the performance of this Ministry. Further
improvements in the workings of this Ministry can
contribute in this Ministry being approved by a
majority of the Pakistani public.
Performance of the Ministry of Interior and
Narcotics Control: 28% provide Approval Ratings
in 2015
A majority of the respondents disapproved of the
performance of this Ministry. Only 28% of the
respondents rated the performance of the Ministry of
Interior and Narcotics Control as 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
On the other hand, a significant 38% of the public
believed the performance of this Ministry to be 'Bad' or
'Very Bad'.
Performance of the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Resources: 40% provide Approval Ratings
in 2015
The Approval Ratings for this Ministry also exhibit
encouraging signs as a significant 40% of the public
rated the performance of this Ministry as 'Good' or
'Very Good'. This implies that with added effort, the
Approval Rating can be improved to constitute the
opinion of the majority of Pakistanis. On the flip side,
35% of the public felt that the performance of this
Ministry was 'Bad' or 'Very Bad' in 2015.
Performance of the Ministry of Planning,
Development and Reforms: 40% provide Approval
Ratings in 2015
A significant proportion of the respondents (40%)
approved of the performance of this Ministry in 2015.
Hence, additional improvements in the performance of
the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms
can result in the Approval Ratings crossing the fifty
percent mark and thus being approved by a majority of
the public. As it stands in 2015, 27% of the public still
feel the performance of this Ministry is not up to the
mark and have voted 'Bad' or 'Very Bad' against it.
Performance of the Ministry of Railways: 43%
An encouraging and significant proportion (43%) of
the respondents approved of the performance of the
Ministry of Railways in 2015. On the other hand, 31%
of the public felt that the performance was not
satisfactory and hence voted in the negative.
Performance of the Ministry of Water and Power:
The performance of this Ministry was rated negatively
by a majority of the public as 56% respondents felt that
the performance was 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. On the other
hand, only 27% of the respondents felt that the
performance of the Ministry was 'Good' or 'Very Good
.
Performance of the Provincial Department for
Education: Highest Approval Rating for KP in 2015
A resounding majority of the public of KP approved of
the performance of the Ministry of Education within
their respective province as 86% respondents felt that
the performance was 'Very Good' or 'Good'. Both
Punjab and Balochistan recorded Approval Ratings
above 50%, hence the majority of the public in these
provinces was positive regarding the work done by
389
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
their Governments regarding education. Sindh

recorded the lowest Approval Rating as only 41% of the
respondents approved of the performance of Sindh
Government.
Health: KP Records Highest Approval Rating in
2015
The Ministry of Health performed well in KP as a
significant 85% of the respondents rated the
performance of the Ministry as 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Punjab came in second with an Approval Rating of
67%. In both Balochistan (49%) and Sindh (38%), the
majority of the public negatively rated the performance
of their respective Government.
Performance of the Provincial Home Department:
Negative Approval Rating for all Provinces except
KP in 2015
A majority of the public negatively rated the
performance of the Interior Ministry. Only a minority
of the public approved of the performance of their
Government regarding this Department in Balochistan
(39%), Punjab (33%) and Sindh (33%). However, a
majority of respondents in KP (57%) approved of the
performance of the Ministry of Interior in 2015
Finance: Negative Approval Rating for all
Provinces except KP in 2015
The Finance Department also generally performed
poorly at the Provincial level as a minority of the public
of Punjab (31%), Sindh (24%) and Balochistan (31%)
rated its performance as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. On the
other hand, 56% respondents in KP approved of the
performance of the Finance Department and voted
either 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Agriculture: Negative Approval Rating for all
Provinces except KP in 2015
The Department of Agriculture also performed poorly
in Punjab (40%), Sindh (25%) and Balochistan (22%)
as the majority public in these Provinces rated the
Provincial Government negatively, either 'Bad' or 'Very
Bad'. In KP, a majority (53%) approved of the
performance of their Provincial Government.
Water and Irrigation: Negative Approval Rating for
all Provinces except KP in 2015
The Department of Water and Irrigation also generally
390
performed poorly at the Provincial level as a minority

of the public of Punjab (39%), Sindh (22%) and
Balochistan (16%) rated its performance as 'Good' or
'Very Good'. On the other hand, 53% respondents in KP
approved of the performance of the Department and
voted either 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Telecommunication: Negative Approval Rating for
The Department for Telecommunication also
performed poorly in Punjab (35%), Sindh (25%), and
Balochistan (28%) as the majority public in these
Provinces rated the Provincial Government negatively,
either 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. In KP, a majority (50%)
approved of the performance of their Provincial
Government.
Local Governments: Negative Approval Rating for
The Department for Local Governments also
performed poorly in Punjab (26%), Sindh (23%), and
Balochistan (34%) as the majority public in these
Provinces rated the Provincial Government negatively,
either 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'. In KP, a majority (56%)
approved of the performance of their Provincial
Government.
Mines and Minerals: People from all Provinces
provide Negative Approval Ratings in 2015
The Ministry of Mines and Minerals was ranked the
lowest in terms of performance by all Pakistanis in
2015 as the majority public of all the Provinces rated
their respective Provincial Governments negatively. A
minority of the respondents in Punjab (16%), Sindh
(18%), Balochistan (19%) and KP (36%) rated the
performance of their Government as 'Good' or 'Very
Good'. The majority rated the performance as 'Bad' or
'Very Bad'.
Forestry: Highest Approval Rating for KP in 2015
The Department of Forestry also performed poorly in
all Provinces except KP as it got the approval of only a
minority of the public in the provinces. 55%
respondents in KP felt that the performance of their
Government was 'Very Good' or 'Good'. In comparison,
only 24%, 18% and 22% respondents in Punjab, Sindh
and Balochistan respectively, approved of the
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
performance of their Provincial Government.

Planning and Development: People from all
Provinces provide Negative Approval Ratings in
2015
The Department for Planning and Development was
ranked negatively in terms of performance by all
respondents in 2015 as the majority public of all the
Provinces rated their respective Provincial
Governments negatively. A minority of the respondents
in Punjab (39%), Sindh (29%), Balochistan (29%) and
KP (48%) rated the performance of their Government
as 'Good' or 'Very Good'. The majority rated the
performance as 'Bad' or 'Very Bad'.
391
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 150: Comparative position with respect to Zardari (All Over Pakistan)
Question: If you compare Nawaz Sharif's Government with Asif Ali Zardari and his Government, do you think
the performance of Nawaz Sharif's Government has been better, worse or there has been no difference?
No
Difference, 23%
Don't
know, 3%
Better, 59%
Worse, 14%
392
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 158: Comparative Position with Respect to Zardari (All Over Pakistan)
Question:If you compare Nawaz Sharif's Government with Asif Ali Zardari and his Government, do you think
Better
Worse
No Difference
Don't Know
No Answer
59%
14%
23%
3%
0%
Male
61%
15%
22%
2%
0%
Female
57%
14%
25%
4%
0%
Young (Under 30)
59%
15%
23%
4%
0%
Middle (30-50)
59%
14%
24%
3%
0%
Old (50+)
61%
12%
23%
4%
0%
Low
55%
16%
25%
4%
0%
Medium
62%
13%
22%
2%
0%
High
70%
10%
18%
2%
0%
Don't Know
61%
9%
24%
6%
0%
No Answer
41%
24%
30%
2%
3%
Balochistan
44%
19%
32%
5%
1%
KP
61%
14%
22%
3%
0%
Punjab
70%
7%
19%
3%
0%
Sindh
39%
30%
30%
2%
0%
Urban
66%
11%
20%
2%
0%
Rural
56%
16%
25%
4%
0%
Respondents from All Over Pakistan

Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
393
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
79%
5%
14%
2%
0%
PTI
50%
15%
33%
2%
0%
PPP
27%
39%
32%
3%
0%
All others
49%
16%
30%
5%
1%
Notes:
Income codes: Low: Up to Rs. 14000 (In 2014 this represented the lowest quintile). Medium: Rs. 14000 to 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 2nd
or 101).
394
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 151: Comparative position with Respect to Musharraf (All Over Pakistan)
Question: If you compare Nawaz Sharif's Government with Pervez Musharraf and his Government, do you
think the performance of Nawaz Sharif's Government has been better, worse or there has been no difference?
Don't know, 5%
No
Difference, 16%
No Answer, 1%
Better, 50%
Worse, 28%
395
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 159: Comparative Position with Respect to Musharraf (All Over Pakistan)
Question: If you compare Nawaz Sharif's Government with Pervez Musharraf and his Government, do you think
Better
Worse
No Difference
Don't Know
No Answer
50%
28%
16%
5%
1%
Male
53%
30%
12%
4%
0%
Female
47%
25%
21%
6%
1%
Young (Under 30)
50%
27%
17%
5%
1%
Middle (30-50)
50%
28%
16%
6%
0%
Old (50+)
54%
27%
15%
4%
1%
Low
46%
30%
18%
6%
0%
Medium
54%
25%
16%
4%
0%
High
59%
26%
13%
3%
0%
Don't Know
56%
17%
15%
10%
1%
No Answer
32%
43%
16%
5%
3%
Balochistan
44%
23%
24%
8%
1%
KP
52%
25%
20%
2%
0%
Punjab
56%
24%
14%
5%
1%
Sindh
39%
41%
15%
6%
0%
Urban
54%
27%
14%
4%
0%
Rural
48%
28%
17%
6%
1%
Respondents from All Over Pakistan

Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
396
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
65%
20%
12%
3%
0%
PTI
41%
34%
22%
3%
0%
PPP
26%
46%
21%
7%
1%
All others
44%
29%
18%
8%
1%
Notes:
or 101).
397
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 152: Future Possibility- Improving the Economy (All Over Pakistan)
Question: In your opinion, what are the chances that Nawaz Sharif, during his current tenure, will be able to
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improvement of Economy)
Don't
know, 12%
No Chance
at all, 9%
A lot of
Chance, 19 %
Little
Chance, 23 %
Somewhat
Chance, 37 %
398
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 160: Future Possibility- Improving the Economy (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improvement of Economy)
Improving the Economy

A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
19%
37%
23%
9%
12%
0%
Male
20%
41%
22%
9%
8%
0%
Female
19%
32%
24%
8%
16%
0%
Young (Under 30)
20%
41%
21%
9%
9%
0%
Middle (30-50)
18%
37%
24%
8%
12%
0%
Old (50+)
22%
29%
22%
9%
17%
0%
Low
19%
36%
22%
10%
13%
0%
Medium
21%
36%
25%
9%
9%
0%
High
22%
40%
22%
9%
8%
0%
Don't Know
17%
31%
25%
7%
20%
0%
No Answer
7%
49%
24%
3%
16%
1%
Balochistan
19%
39%
23%
9%
11%
0%
KP
37%
37%
13%
4%
9%
0%
Punjab
18%
38%
23%
8%
14%
0%
Sindh
13%
33%
29%
14%
10%
0%
Urban
21%
37%
26%
9%
7%
0%
Rural
19%
36%
22%
9%
14%
0%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
399
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
21%
39%
22%
5%
13%
0%
PTI
21%
33%
26%
12%
8%
0%
PPP
9%
37%
27%
13%
14%
0%
All others
21%
36%
22%
11%
11%
0%
Notes:
or 101).
400
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 153: Future Possibility- Improving the Security Situation (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improvement of Peace and Stability)
Don't know, 5%
No Chance at all, 13%
A lot of
Chance, 18%
Little
Chance, 21%
Somewhat
Chance, 43%
401
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 161: Future Possibility- Improving the Security Situation (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improvement of Peace and Stability)
Improving the Security Situation

A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
18%
43%
21%
13%
5%
0%
Male
20%
46%
19%
11%
4%
0%
Female
16%
40%
23%
14%
6%
1%
Young (Under 30)
20%
43%
21%
14%
3%
0%
Middle (30-50)
18%
43%
23%
12%
5%
1%
Old (50+)
17%
43%
18%
12%
9%
0%
Low
16%
43%
22%
13%
5%
1%
Medium
18%
47%
20%
11%
4%
0%
High
23%
42%
20%
12%
3%
1%
Don't Know
20%
32%
21%
13%
15%
0%
No Answer
6%
45%
24%
19%
6%
0%
Balochistan
14%
36%
24%
24%
2%
1%
KP
30%
47%
10%
9%
5%
0%
Punjab
17%
44%
22%
12%
6%
0%
Sindh
16%
41%
26%
13%
3%
1%
Urban
20%
44%
23%
10%
2%
1%
Rural
17%
42%
21%
14%
6%
0%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
402
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
21%
45%
20%
8%
6%
0%
PTI
16%
45%
20%
15%
3%
0%
PPP
10%
44%
25%
15%
5%
1%
All others
18%
40%
21%
17%
4%
1%
Notes:
or 101).
403
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 154: Future Possibility- Controlling Terrorism (All Over Pakistan)

perform well in solving the following problems? (Controlling Terrorism)
No Chance at
all, 17%
Don't
know, 5%
A lot of
Chance, 18%
Little
Chance, 24%
Somewhat
Chance, 36%
404
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 162: Future Possibility- Controlling Terrorism (All Over Pakistan)

perform well in solving the following problems? (Controlling Terrorism)
Controlling Terrorism
A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
18%
36%
24%
17%
5%
0%
Male
19%
39%
22%
16%
4%
0%
Female
16%
32%
27%
19%
6%
0%
Young (Under 30)
19%
36%
24%
18%
3%
0%
Middle (30-50)
17%
36%
25%
17%
5%
0%
Old (50+)
17%
35%
23%
17%
8%
0%
Low
15%
35%
26%
19%
5%
0%
Medium
18%
37%
26%
15%
3%
0%
High
24%
37%
23%
15%
2%
0%
Don't Know
17%
34%
19%
17%
13%
0%
No Answer
10%
40%
20%
24%
7%
0%
Balochistan
12%
32%
17%
36%
3%
0%
KP
26%
35%
20%
14%
5%
0%
Punjab
18%
35%
27%
15%
6%
0%
Sindh
15%
39%
24%
18%
3%
1%
Urban
20%
38%
25%
14%
3%
0%
Rural
16%
35%
24%
19%
6%
0%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
405
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
21%
36%
26%
12%
5%
0%
PTI
11%
36%
26%
22%
5%
0%
PPP
11%
39%
24%
22%
4%
1%
All others
17%
35%
23%
21%
5%
0%
Notes:
or 101).
406
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 155: Future Possibility- Decreasing Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)

perform well in solving the following problems? (Decreasing Unemployment)
Don't
know, 5%
A lot of
Chance, 9%
Somewhat
Chance, 23%
No Chance at
all, 34%
Little
Chance, 30%
407
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 163: Future Possibility- Decreasing Unemployment (All Over Pakistan)

perform well in solving the following problems? (Decreasing Unemployment)
Decreasing Unemployment
A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
9%
23%
30%
34%
5%
0%
Male
7%
25%
32%
32%
4%
0%
Female
10%
20%
28%
35%
6%
0%
Young (Under 30)
10%
24%
31%
31%
4%
0%
Middle (30-50)
8%
22%
30%
36%
4%
0%
Old (50+)
8%
24%
28%
33%
7%
1%
Low
8%
20%
29%
37%
5%
0%
Medium
9%
26%
31%
31%
3%
0%
High
10%
26%
30%
32%
3%
0%
Don't Know
10%
16%
32%
31%
11%
0%
No Answer
7%
30%
25%
32%
5%
2%
Balochistan
1%
19%
29%
50%
2%
0%
KP
18%
23%
23%
32%
4%
0%
Punjab
10%
26%
30%
29%
5%
0%
Sindh
4%
17%
34%
41%
4%
1%
Urban
8%
22%
36%
31%
3%
1%
Rural
9%
23%
27%
35%
6%
0%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
408
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
11%
28%
30%
26%
5%
0%
PTI
8%
18%
31%
39%
4%
0%
PPP
3%
19%
33%
40%
5%
1%
All others
8%
19%
28%
41%
4%
1%
Notes:
or 101).
409
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 156: Future Possibility- Alleviating Poverty (All Over Pakistan)

perform well in solving the following problems? (Poverty Reduction)
Don't
know, 5%
No
Answer, 1%
A lot of
Chance, 8%
Somewhat
Chance, 21%
No Chance at
all, 36%
Little
Chance, 29%
410
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 164: Future Possibility- Alleviating Poverty (All Over Pakistan)

perform well in solving the following problems? (Poverty Reduction)
Alleviating Poverty
A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
8%
21%
29%
36%
5%
1%
Male
7%
23%
30%
36%
4%
1%
Female
10%
19%
28%
37%
6%
1%
Young (Under 30)
9%
21%
31%
35%
4%
1%
Middle (30-50)
7%
21%
29%
38%
5%
0%
Old (50+)
9%
21%
29%
34%
7%
0%
Low
8%
18%
29%
40%
6%
1%
Medium
9%
23%
30%
34%
4%
1%
High
9%
24%
30%
33%
3%
1%
Don't Know
8%
17%
33%
31%
11%
0%
No Answer
5%
29%
25%
34%
6%
1%
Balochistan
1%
14%
27%
53%
4%
0%
KP
18%
21%
19%
37%
5%
1%
Punjab
9%
24%
31%
31%
5%
0%
Sindh
4%
15%
33%
42%
5%
1%
Urban
7%
20%
35%
34%
3%
1%
Rural
8%
21%
26%
38%
6%
1%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
411
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
11%
26%
30%
28%
5%
0%
PTI
7%
16%
31%
41%
4%
1%
PPP
2%
18%
29%
44%
6%
1%
All others
8%
16%
28%
43%
5%
0%
Notes:
Estimated error margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence level.1. PERCENTAGES have been rounded off to nearest whole number. As a result the total can
sometimes be at slight variation from 100 (for example 99 or 101).
412
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 157: Future Possibility- Improving Relations with USA (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improving Relations with the United States of America)
No
Answer, 2%
A lot of
Chance, 12%
Don't
know, 30%
Somewhat
Chance, 26%
No Chance at
all, 12%
Little
Chance, 18%
413
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 165: Future Possibility- Improving Relations with USA(All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improving Relations with the United States of America)
Improving Relations with America

A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
12%
26%
18%
12%
30%
2%
Male
14%
32%
20%
14%
19%
2%
Female
9%
20%
17%
10%
42%
3%
Young (Under 30)
15%
27%
18%
11%
28%
2%
Middle (30-50)
10%
27%
19%
12%
30%
3%
Old (50+)
10%
21%
18%
15%
34%
1%
Low
10%
25%
18%
12%
34%
2%
Medium
11%
31%
18%
12%
26%
3%
High
12%
29%
22%
13%
24%
1%
Don't Know
17%
14%
19%
18%
30%
2%
No Answer
14%
19%
10%
6%
42%
8%
Balochistan
12%
42%
20%
12%
13%
0%
KP
26%
25%
11%
7%
30%
2%
Punjab
11%
24%
17%
13%
34%
2%
Sindh
5%
26%
25%
12%
27%
4%
Urban
9%
26%
23%
17%
24%
1%
Rural
13%
26%
16%
10%
33%
3%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
414
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
13%
26%
16%
11%
32%
1%
PTI
13%
27%
16%
16%
25%
2%
PPP
8%
29%
20%
7%
31%
6%
All others
11%
25%
21%
14%
28%
2%
Notes:
415
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 158: Future Possibility- Improving Relations with India (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improving Relations with India)
No
Answer, 4%
Don't
know, 29%
A lot of
Chance, 7%
Somewhat
Chance, 22%
No Chance at
all, 18%
Little
Chance, 20%
416
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 166: Future Possibility- Improving Relations with India (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improving Relations with India)
Improving Relations with India

A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
7%
22%
20%
18%
29%
4%
Male
8%
25%
22%
24%
17%
3%
Female
7%
19%
17%
12%
41%
4%
Young (Under 30)
10%
21%
19%
19%
27%
4%
Middle (30-50)
7%
23%
20%
17%
30%
3%
Old (50+)
5%
19%
19%
21%
31%
5%
Low
7%
21%
19%
16%
32%
4%
Medium
9%
25%
19%
19%
23%
5%
High
7%
24%
25%
19%
23%
2%
Don't Know
4%
14%
17%
27%
37%
1%
No Answer
3%
19%
12%
18%
43%
6%
Balochistan
4%
25%
26%
24%
19%
1%
KP
21%
24%
13%
10%
29%
3%
Punjab
6%
20%
19%
20%
32%
3%
Sindh
3%
25%
24%
15%
26%
7%
Urban
6%
23%
23%
22%
22%
4%
Rural
8%
22%
18%
16%
33%
4%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
417
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
7%
23%
19%
19%
30%
3%
PTI
12%
20%
18%
22%
26%
3%
PPP
4%
29%
20%
9%
32%
8%
All others
8%
19%
22%
19%
28%
3%
Notes:
418
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 159: Future Possibility- Improving Relations with Afghanistan (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improving Relations with Afghanistan)
No
Answer, 4%
A lot of
Chance, 11%
Don't
know, 31%
Somewhat
Chance, 25%
No Chance at
all, 12%
Little
Chance, 17%
419
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 167: Future Possibility- Improving Relations with Afghanistan (All Over Pakistan)
perform well in solving the following problems? (Improving Relations with Afghanistan
Improving Relations with Afghanistan

A Lot of
Chance
Somewhat
chance
Very little
chance
No chance
at all
Don't
Know
No Answer
11%
25%
17%
12%
31%
4%
Male
14%
31%
18%
16%
18%
5%
Female
8%
19%
16%
8%
45%
4%
Young (Under 30)
13%
26%
16%
12%
29%
4%
Middle (30-50)
11%
25%
17%
12%
32%
4%
Old (50+)
9%
22%
18%
13%
33%
6%
Low
11%
19%
17%
12%
35%
6%
Medium
11%
31%
16%
12%
26%
5%
High
11%
32%
19%
12%
24%
2%
Don't Know
10%
18%
16%
16%
37%
3%
No Answer
13%
27%
12%
6%
39%
4%
Balochistan
14%
31%
15%
16%
19%
5%
KP
24%
24%
12%
11%
26%
4%
Punjab
10%
23%
15%
13%
35%
4%
Sindh
5%
28%
23%
10%
28%
6%
Urban
9%
27%
19%
15%
25%
5%
Rural
12%
24%
16%
11%
34%
4%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
Location-wise
420
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
PML-N
12%
25%
15%
11%
33%
3%
PTI
11%
24%
15%
19%
27%
5%
PPP
7%
25%
21%
7%
35%
6%
All others
11%
25%
17%
13%
28%
6%
Notes:
421
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 160: Trust in Institutions National Accountability Bureau (NAB) (All Over Pakistan)
Question: I will ask about some institutions. Please tell us to what extent do you trust the performance of these
institutions? Answer separately for each institution whether you trust the institution's performance a lot,
somewhat, little, or not at all.
(National Accountability Bureau NAB)
No
answer, 3%
A lot, 8%
Somewhat, 22%
Don't
know, 36%
Little, 20%
Not at
all, 11%

422
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 168: Trust in Institutions National Accountability Bureau (NAB) (All Over Pakistan)
somewhat, less, or not at all.
(National Accountability Bureau NAB)
NAB
A lot
Somewhat
Not at all
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
8%
22%
20%
11%
36%
3%
30%
Male
11%
27%
23%
13%
24%
3%
38%
Female
6%
16%
17%
9%
47%
4%
22%
Young (Under 30)
10%
23%
21%
12%
33%
2%
33%
Middle (30-50)
8%
22%
21%
11%
35%
4%
30%
Old (50+)
8%
19%
16%
12%
43%
3%
27%
Low
9%
17%
19%
12%
39%
4%
26%
Medium
10%
28%
21%
11%
28%
3%
38%
High
11%
26%
25%
10%
28%
1%
37%
Don't Know
1%
15%
17%
9%
55%
3%
16%
No Answer
2%
22%
18%
9%
46%
3%
24%

Over Pakistan
Less
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
423
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
7%
18%
28%
20%
24%
3%
25%
KP
26%
26%
16%
6%
24%
3%
52%
Punjab
6%
19%
17%
10%
44%
3%
25%
Sindh
6%
26%
26%
13%
25%
4%
32%
Urban
8%
24%
28%
10%
27%
3%
32%
Rural
9%
20%
17%
12%
40%
3%
29%
PML-N
7%
22%
19%
9%
41%
3%
29%
PTI
11%
20%
24%
12%
31%
2%
31%
PPP
5%
25%
22%
10%
33%
5%
30%
All others
12%
21%
20%
14%
31%
3%
33%
Location-wise
Notes:
424
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 161: Trust in Institutions - Government Officers (All Over Pakistan)

(Government Officers)
No
Don't
answer,
1% A lot, 7%
know, 13%
Somewhat, 25%
Not at
all, 25%
Little, 30%

425
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 169: Trust in Institutions - Government Officers (All Over Pakistan)

(Government Officers)
Government Officers
A lot
Somewhat
Less
Not at all
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings
2015
7=(1+2)
7%
25%
30%
25%
13%
1%
32%
Male
7%
25%
32%
29%
6%
1%
32%
Female
7%
24%
28%
20%
20%
2%
31%
Young (Under 30)
7%
26%
28%
26%
11%
1%
33%
Middle (30-50)
7%
25%
31%
24%
12%
1%
32%
Old (50+)
7%
21%
29%
24%
17%
1%
28%
Low
7%
26%
28%
24%
14%
1%
33%
Medium
9%
27%
30%
22%
12%
2%
36%
High
6%
25%
37%
24%
7%
1%
31%
Don't Know
3%
17%
27%
26%
27%
0%
20%
No Answer
4%
16%
27%
43%
8%
3%
20%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
426
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
1%
25%
31%
39%
5%
26%
KP
19%
29%
22%
18%
11%
2%
48%
Punjab
6%
24%
30%
23%
17%
1%
30%
Sindh
6%
24%
36%
26%
7%
1%
30%
Urban
8%
25%
36%
22%
8%
1%
32%
Rural
7%
24%
27%
26%
15%
1%
31%
PML-N
5%
26%
30%
23%
15%
1%
31%
PTI
11%
25%
27%
25%
12%
1%
36%
PPP
5%
26%
29%
24%
14%
2%
31%
All others
9%
22%
31%
26%
10%
1%
31%
Location-wise
Notes:
427
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 162: Trust in Institutions Armed Forces (All Over Pakistan)

(Armed Forces)
Not at
all, 5%
Don't
know, 10%
No
answer, 2%
Little, 8%
A lot, 46%
Somewhat, 29%

428
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 170: Trust in Institutions Armed Forces (All Over Pakistan)

somewhat, less, or not at all.(Armed Forces)
Armed Forces
A lot
Somewhat
Less
Not at all
Don't
Know
7=(1+2)
46%
29%
8%
5%
10%
2%
75%
Male
56%
27%
7%
5%
4%
1%
83%
Female
36%
32%
9%
6%
15%
2%
68%
Young (Under 30)
49%
25%
9%
6%
9%
2%
74%
Middle (30-50)
45%
31%
9%
5%
9%
2%
76%
Old (50+)
46%
29%
7%
5%
13%
1%
75%
Low
42%
28%
10%
7%
12%
2%
70%
Medium
47%
29%
9%
6%
8%
1%
76%
High
54%
31%
6%
3%
5%
1%
85%
Don't Know
54%
28%
3%
1%
15%
0%
82%
No Answer
47%
29%
9%
4%
5%
6%
76%

Over Pakistan
No
Approval
Answer Ratings 2015
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
429
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
37%
31%
14%
12%
5%
2%
68%
KP
58%
19%
6%
6%
10%
2%
77%
Punjab
48%
30%
6%
3%
12%
1%
78%
Sindh
39%
32%
12%
9%
6%
2%
71%
Urban
46%
32%
10%
4%
7%
1%
78%
Rural
46%
28%
8%
6%
11%
2%
74%
PML-N
51%
29%
6%
3%
10%
1%
80%
PTI
47%
31%
7%
6%
9%
1%
78%
PPP
27%
38%
11%
10%
11%
3%
65%
All others
47%
24%
11%
7%
9%
2%
71%
Location-wise
Notes:
430
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 165: Trust in Institutions - Police (All Over Pakistan)

somewhat, less, or not at all. (Police)
Don't
Know, 10%
No
Answer, 2%
A lot, 11%
Somewhat, 21%
Not At
All, 32%
Less, 25%

431
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 171: Trust in Institutions - Police (All Over Pakistan)

(Police)
Police

Over Pakistan
A lot
Somewhat
Less
Not at all
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
11%
21%
25%
32%
10%
2%
32%
11%
21%
24%
39%
4%
1%
32%
10%
21%
27%
25%
15%
2%
31%
12%
20%
26%
34%
8%
1%
32%
11%
23%
26%
30%
9%
2%
34%
9%
17%
23%
36%
14%
1%
26%
11%
24%
25%
28%
10%
2%
35%
14%
20%
26%
31%
9%
2%
34%
9%
21%
27%
39%
5%
1%
30%
6%
10%
20%
40%
24%
2%
16%
6%
16%
23%
49%
5%
2%
22%
Gender-wise
Male
Female
Respondent Age-wise
Young (Under 30)
Middle (30-50)
Old (50+)
Low
Medium
High
Don't Know
No Answer
432
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
12%
17%
39%
29%
2%
1%
29%
KP
35%
22%
13%
19%
9%
2%
57%
Punjab
7%
16%
25%
38%
14%
2%
23%
Sindh
7%
32%
28%
28%
3%
2%
39%
Urban
9%
20%
29%
35%
5%
2%
29%
Rural
12%
21%
23%
31%
12%
2%
33%
PML-N
7%
18%
24%
37%
12%
1%
25%
PTI
18%
23%
20%
30%
9%
1%
41%
PPP
9%
28%
24%
27%
9%
3%
37%
All others
14%
20%
28%
28%
7%
2%
34%
Location-wise
Notes:
433
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 166: Performance of Prime Minister (All Over Pakistan)

Question: What is your opinion on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's overall performance over the past two
years?
Very Bad, 6%
Don't
know, 3%
Very
Good, 21%
Bad, 18%
Good, 52%

434
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 172: Performance of Prime Minister (All Over Pakistan)

Question: What is your opinion on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's overall performance over the past two years?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
21%
52%
18%
6%
3%
1%
73%
Male
21%
51%
19%
8%
2%
0%
72%
Female
22%
53%
17%
5%
4%
1%
75%
Young (Under 30)
20%
51%
20%
7%
3%
1%
71%
Middle (30-50)
21%
52%
18%
6%
3%
0%
73%
Old (50+)
23%
52%
15%
6%
4%
1%
75%
Low
20%
50%
19%
7%
4%
1%
70%
Medium
21%
57%
14%
6%
2%
0%
78%
High
28%
52%
15%
4%
1%
0%
80%
Don't Know
21%
49%
21%
4%
3%
1%
70%
No Answer
7%
49%
36%
5%
1%
1%
56%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
435
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
17%
41%
26%
12%
2%
2%
58%
KP
35%
48%
10%
5%
2%
0%
83%
Punjab
21%
55%
15%
5%
3%
1%
76%
Sindh
16%
50%
25%
6%
3%
0%
66%
Urban
26%
56%
12%
4%
1%
0%
82%
Rural
19%
49%
21%
7%
4%
1%
68%
PML-N
27%
56%
12%
3%
2%
0%
83%
PTI
22%
45%
21%
11%
1%
0%
67%
PPP
8%
45%
32%
8%
5%
1%
53%
All others
19%
50%
19%
8%
3%
1%
69%
Location-wise
Notes:
435
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 165: Performance of Chief Minister of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)

Question: What is your opinion about the overall performances of the Chief Minister of Punjab, Chief Minister
of Sindh, Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Chief Minister of Balochistan for the past two years?
Chief Minister of Punjab
Don't
know, 9%
Very Bad, 4%
Bad, 10%
Very
Good, 33%
Good, 45%

436
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 173: Performance of Chief Minister of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)

Question: What is your opinion about the overall performances of the Chief Minister of Punjab, Chief Minister of
Sindh, Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Chief Minister of Balochistan for the past two years? Chief
Minister of Punjab
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
33%
45%
10%
4%
9%
0%
78%
Male
33%
46%
10%
5%
6%
0%
79%
Female
31%
44%
9%
3%
12%
1%
75%
Young (Under 30)
32%
46%
10%
4%
8%
0%
78%
Middle (30-50)
33%
45%
9%
4%
8%
0%
78%
Old (50+)
32%
42%
9%
4%
12%
0%
74%
Low
29%
45%
10%
5%
11%
0%
74%
Medium
33%
49%
8%
3%
7%
0%
82%
High
38%
44%
9%
4%
6%
0%
82%
Don't Know
40%
42%
9%
1%
7%
0%
82%
No Answer
32%
34%
15%
2%
17%
0%
66%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
437
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
35%
45%
11%
1%
7%
0%
80%
KP
43%
36%
5%
4%
12%
0%
79%
Punjab
31%
49%
10%
4%
5%
0%
80%
Sindh
28%
40%
10%
6%
16%
0%
68%
Urban
38%
46%
6%
4%
6%
0%
84%
Rural
30%
44%
11%
4%
11%
0%
74%
PML-N
39%
48%
7%
2%
5%
0%
87%
PTI
27%
45%
14%
6%
8%
0%
72%
PPP
18%
46%
12%
7%
15%
1%
64%
All others
31%
41%
11%
4%
12%
0%
72%
Location-wise
Notes:
438
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 166: Performance of Chief Minister of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)

Chief Minister of Sindh
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 5%
Don't
know, 27%
Good, 24%
Very
Bad, 18%
Bad, 25%

439
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 174: Performance of Chief Minister of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)

Minister of Sindh
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
5%
24%
25%
18%
27%
1%
29%
Male
4%
24%
31%
24%
17%
1%
28%
Female
5%
24%
19%
12%
37%
2%
29%
Young (Under 30)
5%
25%
27%
17%
25%
1%
30%
Middle (30-50)
5%
25%
24%
18%
27%
1%
30%
Old (50+)
3%
21%
26%
19%
31%
2%
24%
Low
5%
25%
24%
18%
28%
1%
30%
Medium
5%
29%
22%
18%
25%
2%
34%
High
5%
21%
34%
19%
20%
1%
26%
Don't Know
1%
13%
23%
18%
45%
1%
14%
No Answer
5%
21%
28%
16%
29%
1%
26%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
440
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
7%
41%
28%
14%
10%
0%
48%
KP
12%
36%
19%
9%
23%
2%
48%
Punjab
2%
13%
21%
22%
40%
2%
15%
Sindh
5%
38%
37%
16%
4%
0%
43%
Urban
4%
23%
35%
19%
19%
1%
27%
Rural
5%
25%
21%
17%
31%
2%
30%
PML-N
2%
16%
22%
22%
38%
1%
18%
PTI
7%
23%
30%
18%
22%
1%
30%
PPP
8%
40%
28%
12%
12%
1%
48%
All others
6%
29%
28%
16%
19%
2%
35%
Location-wise
Notes:
441
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 167: Performance of Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over Pakistan)
Chief Minister of KP
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 10%
Don't
know, 33%
Good, 28%
Very
Bad, 12%
Bad, 17%

442
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 175: Performance of Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over Pakistan)
Minister of KP
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings
7=(1+2)
10%
28%
17%
12%
33%
2%
38%
Male
11%
31%
19%
13%
26%
1%
42%
Female
8%
25%
14%
10%
41%
2%
33%
Young (Under 30)
11%
29%
18%
11%
28%
2%
40%
Middle (30-50)
9%
29%
16%
12%
34%
2%
38%
Old (50+)
9%
23%
17%
11%
40%
2%
32%
Low
10%
27%
15%
9%
38%
2%
37%
Medium
9%
33%
16%
12%
28%
2%
42%
High
9%
26%
19%
17%
27%
1%
37%
Don't Know
5%
12%
18%
14%
49%
1%
17%
No Answer
14%
41%
18%
7%
14%
6%
55%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
443
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
9%
42%
25%
8%
14%
2%
51%
KP
34%
50%
6%
3%
7%
0%
84%
Punjab
6%
21%
15%
14%
43%
2%
27%
Sindh
6%
27%
23%
12%
30%
3%
33%
Urban
7%
26%
19%
19%
29%
1%
33%
Rural
11%
28%
15%
8%
35%
2%
39%
PML-N
5%
22%
16%
15%
41%
1%
27%
PTI
27%
38%
12%
5%
18%
0%
65%
PPP
7%
25%
24%
7%
34%
3%
32%
All others
11%
34%
16%
11%
27%
2%
45%
Location-wise
Notes:
444
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 168: Performance of Chief Minister of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)

Chief Minister of Balochistan
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 7%
Good, 21%
Don't
know, 40%
Bad, 16%
Very
Bad, 13%

445
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 176: Performance of Chief Minister of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)

Chief Minister of Balochistan
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7= (1+2)
7%
21%
16%
13%
40%
3%
28%
Male
7%
27%
18%
15%
32%
2%
34%
Female
6%
16%
14%
11%
49%
3%
22%
Young (Under 30)
7%
23%
19%
13%
36%
2%
30%
Middle (30-50)
7%
21%
16%
13%
41%
3%
28%
Old (50+)
5%
20%
14%
12%
47%
3%
25%
Low
8%
19%
15%
13%
43%
2%
27%
Medium
6%
28%
16%
14%
34%
3%
34%
High
6%
24%
22%
13%
34%
2%
30%
Don't Know
3%
7%
16%
15%
56%
3%
10%
No Answer
6%
21%
9%
14%
45%
6%
27%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
446
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
15%
37%
24%
22%
1%
1%
52%
KP
18%
31%
13%
8%
27%
3%
49%
Punjab
4%
15%
14%
14%
51%
2%
19%
Sindh
4%
26%
21%
10%
36%
4%
30%
Urban
4%
20%
21%
15%
39%
2%
24%
Rural
8%
22%
14%
12%
41%
3%
30%
PML-N
4%
17%
14%
13%
50%
2%
21%
PTI
9%
23%
19%
14%
34%
2%
32%
PPP
6%
26%
18%
10%
36%
5%
32%
All others
10%
24%
18%
14%
32%
3%
34%
Location-wise
Notes:
447
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 169: Performance of Provincial Government ofPunjab (All Over Pakistan)

Question: What is your opinion about the performance of the Provincial Governments after the General Election
2013? Government of Punjab
Don't
know, 9%
Very Bad, 4%
Very
Good, 32%
Bad, 10%
Good, 44%

448
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 177: Performance of Provincial Government ofPunjab (All Over Pakistan)

2013? Government of Punjab
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
32%
44%
10%
4%
9%
0%
76%
Male
34%
44%
10%
5%
6%
1%
78%
Female
31%
44%
9%
3%
13%
0%
75%
Young (Under 30)
32%
44%
11%
4%
8%
0%
76%
Middle (30-50)
32%
46%
9%
4%
9%
1%
78%
Old (50+)
33%
40%
10%
4%
12%
0%
73%
Low
28%
44%
11%
6%
11%
1%
72%
Medium
34%
47%
9%
4%
7%
0%
81%
High
38%
44%
8%
2%
6%
1%
82%
Don't Know
42%
41%
9%
2%
6%
0%
83%
No Answer
28%
37%
11%
6%
18%
0%
65%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
449
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
33%
41%
14%
5%
6%
1%
74%
KP
48%
31%
5%
3%
13%
0%
79%
Punjab
30%
50%
10%
4%
6%
0%
80%
Sindh
28%
40%
10%
6%
16%
1%
68%
Urban
37%
47%
7%
3%
6%
0%
84%
Rural
30%
43%
11%
5%
11%
1%
73%
PML-N
37%
48%
8%
2%
5%
0%
85%
PTI
32%
41%
11%
9%
8%
0%
73%
PPP
18%
43%
16%
7%
15%
1%
61%
All others
32%
41%
10%
5%
12%
1%
73%
Location-wise
Notes:
450
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 170: Performance of Provincial Government of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)

2013? Government of Sindh
No
Answer, 1%
Very Good, 5%
Don't
know, 26%
Good, 25%
Very Bad, 19%
Bad, 24%

451
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 178: Performance of Provincial Government of Sindh (All Over Pakistan)

2013? Government of Sindh
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7= (1+2)
5%
25%
24%
19%
26%
1%
30%
Male
4%
25%
29%
24%
17%
1%
29%
Female
6%
26%
18%
14%
35%
2%
32%
Young (Under 30)
5%
26%
25%
18%
25%
1%
31%
Middle (30-50)
5%
26%
22%
20%
26%
1%
31%
Old (50+)
4%
21%
25%
19%
30%
2%
25%
Low
4%
25%
22%
19%
29%
1%
29%
Medium
6%
31%
21%
21%
21%
2%
37%
High
6%
23%
32%
19%
19%
1%
29%
Don't Know
2%
14%
21%
19%
43%
1%
16%
No Answer
9%
23%
22%
18%
28%
1%
32%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
452
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
5%
39%
28%
16%
10%
2%
44%
KP
12%
37%
20%
9%
19%
4%
49%
Punjab
2%
15%
19%
24%
39%
1%
17%
Sindh
7%
37%
34%
16%
5%
1%
44%
Urban
4%
26%
31%
20%
18%
1%
30%
Rural
5%
24%
20%
19%
30%
2%
29%
PML-N
2%
18%
21%
22%
37%
1%
20%
PTI
6%
28%
25%
19%
21%
2%
34%
PPP
10%
37%
26%
12%
13%
2%
47%
All others
6%
29%
26%
19%
19%
2%
35%
Location-wise
Notes:
453
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 171: Performance of Provincial Government of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)

2013? Government of Balochistan
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 5%
Good, 23%
Don't
know, 38%
Bad, 18%
Very
Bad, 13%

454
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 179: Performance of Provincial Government of Balochistan (All Over Pakistan)

2013? Government of Balochistan
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings 2015
7=(1+2)
5%
23%
18%
13%
38%
3%
28%
Male
6%
28%
20%
15%
30%
2%
34%
Female
5%
17%
17%
11%
47%
3%
22%
Young (Under 30)
7%
24%
21%
12%
34%
2%
31%
Middle (30-50)
5%
23%
16%
14%
39%
3%
28%
Old (50+)
3%
20%
19%
11%
43%
3%
23%
Low
6%
21%
16%
13%
41%
3%
27%
Medium
6%
28%
18%
14%
33%
2%
34%
High
6%
26%
23%
12%
31%
2%
32%
Don't Know
2%
8%
19%
15%
52%
3%
10%
No Answer
6%
18%
20%
10%
43%
4%
24%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
455
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
15%
39%
24%
19%
3%
0%
54%
KP
15%
35%
14%
8%
25%
4%
50%
Punjab
3%
16%
16%
15%
48%
2%
19%
Sindh
4%
26%
23%
10%
35%
3%
30%
Urban
3%
23%
22%
14%
37%
2%
26%
Rural
7%
23%
16%
13%
39%
3%
30%
PML-N
3%
18%
17%
14%
46%
2%
21%
PTI
6%
29%
17%
12%
33%
4%
35%
PPP
5%
26%
21%
10%
35%
4%
31%
All others
8%
26%
19%
14%
30%
2%
34%
Location-wise
Notes:
456
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 172: Performance of Provincial Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over

Pakistan)
2013? Government of KP
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 10%
Don't
know, 32%
Good, 28%
Very
Bad, 12%
Bad, 16%

457
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 180: Performance of Provincial Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (All Over

Pakistan)
2013? Government of KP
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval
Ratings
7=(1+2)
10%
28%
16%
12%
32%
2%
38%
Male
11%
32%
18%
14%
24%
1%
43%
Female
8%
23%
15%
11%
40%
3%
31%
Young (Under 30)
11%
29%
18%
11%
28%
2%
40%
Middle (30-50)
9%
29%
16%
12%
32%
2%
38%
Old (50+)
9%
24%
16%
13%
37%
2%
33%
Low
10%
26%
14%
10%
37%
3%
36%
Medium
9%
35%
17%
13%
26%
2%
44%
High
10%
27%
21%
15%
27%
1%
37%
Don't Know
5%
12%
19%
15%
48%
2%
17%
No Answer
14%
39%
13%
16%
15%
4%
53%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
458
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province-wise
Balochistan
9%
44%
24%
7%
12%
4%
53%
KP
34%
51%
5%
3%
7%
0%
85%
Punjab
6%
21%
15%
15%
42%
2%
27%
Sindh
5%
27%
24%
12%
30%
2%
32%
Urban
6%
26%
21%
16%
30%
2%
32%
Rural
11%
29%
14%
10%
33%
3%
40%
PML-N
5%
23%
15%
15%
40%
2%
28%
PTI
28%
39%
10%
3%
18%
1%
67%
PPP
6%
28%
21%
12%
31%
3%
34%
All others
12%
32%
18%
10%
26%
2%
44%
Location-wise
Notes:
459
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 173: Biggest Current Issues in Pakistan (All Over Pakistan)

Question: In your opinion, what is the biggest current issue of Pakistan?
Respondents from all aver the Pakistan 2015

Corruption Other Problems
Don't Know
3%
3%
2%
No response
2%
Education
4%
Drinking
water
6%
Inflation
Energy Crises:
Electricity &
CNG's load
shedding
25%
10%
Poverty
12%
Unemployement
19 %
Security
Issues:
Peace, law &
order and
Terrorism
14%
460
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 181: Biggest Current Issues in Pakistan (All Over Pakistan)

Question: In your opinion, what is the biggest current issue of Pakistan?
Energy Crises: Electricity & CNG's load

shedding
Inflation
Unemployment
Security issues: Peace, law & order and

Terrorism
Corruption/Corrupt leaders
Poverty
Drinking water/Lack of filtration plants
Educational Crisis
Others problems
Don't Know
No response
25%
10%
19%
15%
3%
12%
6%
4%
3%
3%
2%
Male
25%
8%
19%
17%
4%
10%
4%
5%
4%
3%
2%
Female
25%
11%
19%
12%
3%
14%
8%
3%
2%
3%
1%
Young (Under 30)
24%
8%
19%
16%
3%
12%
6%
6%
2%
3%
2%
Middle (30-50)
25%
9%
20%
14%
3%
12%
6%
4%
3%
3%
2%
Old (50+)
25%
13%
16%
14%
4%
12%
5%
3%
3%
2%
2%
Low
24%
10%
20%
13%
2%
15%
5%
4%
2%
3%
2%
Medium
24%
7%
19%
15%
6%
11%
7%
5%
3%
1%
2%
High
23%
11%
18%
19%
4%
8%
5%
5%
5%
2%
1%
Don't Know
31%
19%
14%
10%
3%
10%
6%
1%
3%
1%
2%
No Answer
36%
1%
13%
22%
6%
6%
2%
10%
4%

Over Pakistan
Gender
Respondent Age
Household Income
461
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Province
Punjab
5%
2%
20%
24%
4%
19%
11%
8%
3%
2%
3%
Sindh
21%
6%
18%
26%
3%
9%
3%
5%
3%
5%
1%
KP
30%
11%
18%
13%
3%
13%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
Balochistan
22%
10%
21%
8%
4%
9%
12%
5%
4%
3%
2%
Rural
25%
9%
18%
12%
4%
13%
9%
4%
4%
2%
2%
Urban
25%
10%
19%
16%
3%
12%
4%
4%
2%
3%
2%
PML-N
29%
11%
18%
16%
3%
13%
3%
4%
2%
1%
1%
PTI
20%
12%
20%
15%
3%
12%
7%
7%
2%
1%
1%
PPP
26%
12%
25%
8%
2%
12%
4%
4%
2%
4%
1%
All others
21%
6%
17%
15%
4%
12%
9%
4%
4%
4%
4%
Location
Voting Intention
Notes:
Location: Urban is defined as location defined as town or city in the census, the total in Pakistan being 470 constituting 35% of the population; Rural is
Methodology: Sample Size: 3065; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: July 16 August 6,
2014. Estimated error margin: +3-5% at 95% confidence level.
462
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 174: Performance of the Ministry of Commerce (Federal)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Please tell us of your opinion
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Commerce
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 11%
Do Not
Know, 28%
Good, 36%
Very Bad, 6%
Bad, 18%

463
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 182: Performance of the Ministry of Commerce (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Commerce
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
11%
36%
18%
6%
28%
1%
47%
Male
10%
40%
22%
7%
20%
1%
50%
Female
11%
32%
14%
5%
36%
1%
43%
Young (Under 30)
13%
39%
18%
6%
24%
1%
52%
Middle (30-50)
10%
37%
19%
7%
27%
1%
47%
Old (50+)
9%
33%
17%
5%
34%
1%
42%
Low
11%
32%
19%
7%
31%
1%
43%
Medium
11%
48%
15%
6%
21%
1%
59%
High
12%
42%
20%
5%
21%
1%
54%
Don't Know
7%
24%
20%
7%
41%
1%
31%
No Answer
3%
21%
27%
6%
40%
3%
24%
Balochistan
9%
34%
29%
6%
21%
2%
43%
KP
28%
37%
11%
3%
21%
0%
65%
Punjab
8%
38%
15%
5%
33%
1%
46%
Sindh
7%
33%
27%
11%
20%
2%
40%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
464
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
10%
40%
21%
6%
21%
1%
50%
Rural
11%
35%
17%
6%
31%
1%
46%
PML-N
10%
43%
13%
4%
30%
1%
53%
PTI
15%
27%
22%
8%
28%
1%
42%
PPP
6%
34%
22%
10%
26%
3%
40%
All others
13%
32%
22%
8%
25%
1%
45%
Notes:
Income codes: Low: Up to Rs. 14000 (In 2014 this represented the lowest quintile). Medium: Rs. 14000 to 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 2nd and 3rd Quintile). High:
More than 20,000 (In 2014 this represented the 4th and 5th Quintiles)
Methodology: Sample Size: 3231; Coverage: National/Rural and Urban/All four provinces; Mode: Face to face; Survey dates: June 02 - June 12, 2015. Estimated error
margin: +2-5% at 95% confidence level.
1. PERCENTAGES have been rounded off to nearest whole number. As a result the total can sometimes be at slight variation from 100 (for example 99 or 101)
465
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 175: Performance of the Ministry of Defence (Federal)

Question: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Please tell us of your
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Defence
Do Not
Know, 24%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 14%
Very Bad, 6%
Good, 41%
Bad, 15%

466
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 183: Performance of the Ministry of Defence (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Defence
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
14%
41%
15%
6%
24%
1%
55%
Male
14%
46%
17%
6%
16%
1%
60%
Female
13%
36%
12%
6%
32%
2%
49%
Young (Under 30)
16%
40%
14%
7%
22%
1%
56%
Middle (30-50)
13%
42%
15%
6%
23%
1%
55%
Old (50+)
13%
39%
15%
4%
28%
1%
52%
Low
13%
37%
16%
8%
25%
1%
50%
Medium
15%
46%
13%
3%
21%
1%
61%
High
16%
51%
13%
3%
17%
1%
67%
Don't Know
12%
26%
19%
6%
36%
1%
38%
No Answer
10%
32%
17%
6%
34%
2%
42%
Balochistan
12%
36%
22%
11%
17%
1%
48%
KP
26%
43%
9%
4%
18%
0%
69%
Punjab
10%
42%
12%
5%
31%
1%
52%
Sindh
15%
40%
22%
8%
13%
2%
55%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
467
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
16%
46%
15%
4%
18%
1%
62%
Rural
13%
39%
15%
7%
26%
2%
52%
PML-N
13%
44%
11%
3%
28%
1%
57%
PTI
12%
42%
17%
8%
21%
1%
54%
PPP
9%
38%
22%
9%
20%
3%
47%
All others
17%
38%
16%
7%
20%
1%
55%
Notes:
468
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 176: Performance of theMinistry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics

and Privatization (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Finance, Revenue,
Economic Affairs, Statistics and Privatization
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 7%
Do Not
Know, 33%
Good, 26%
Very Bad, 9%
Bad, 23%

469
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 184: Performance of the Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics and
Privatization (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Finance, Revenue,
Economic Affairs, Statistics and Privatization
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
26%
23%
9%
33%
2%
33%
Male
7%
31%
26%
10%
24%
2%
38%
Female
6%
22%
19%
8%
42%
3%
28%
Young (Under 30)
9%
28%
23%
11%
28%
3%
37%
Middle (30-50)
6%
27%
23%
9%
33%
2%
33%
Old (50+)
4%
22%
24%
7%
41%
2%
26%
Low
6%
21%
24%
11%
35%
2%
27%
Medium
7%
34%
20%
8%
28%
2%
41%
High
9%
34%
25%
7%
24%
2%
43%
Don't Know
4%
13%
23%
7%
50%
2%
17%
No Answer
3%
19%
22%
12%
41%
3%
22%
Balochistan
9%
28%
28%
12%
17%
7%
37%
KP
21%
33%
18%
8%
21%
0%
54%
Punjab
5%
25%
19%
7%
43%
2%
30%
Sindh
3%
25%
34%
15%
22%
2%
28%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
470
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
6%
29%
28%
10%
26%
2%
35%
Rural
7%
25%
21%
9%
36%
3%
32%
PML-N
6%
29%
18%
6%
39%
2%
35%
PTI
9%
22%
26%
13%
29%
1%
31%
PPP
4%
22%
30%
11%
30%
3%
26%
All others
8%
26%
25%
12%
27%
3%
32%
Notes:
471
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 177: Performance of theMinistry of Foreign Affairs (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Foreign Affairs
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 7%
Do Not
Know, 35%
Good, 30%
Very Bad, 9%
Bad, 18%

472
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 185: Performance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
30%
18%
9%
35%
3%
37%
Male
7%
35%
22%
10%
24%
3%
42%
Female
6%
24%
15%
7%
46%
3%
30%
Young (Under 30)
8%
31%
18%
9%
32%
2%
39%
Middle (30-50)
6%
30%
19%
9%
34%
3%
36%
Old (50+)
5%
27%
17%
8%
40%
3%
32%
Low
7%
24%
19%
10%
37%
4%
31%
Medium
6%
39%
16%
7%
29%
3%
45%
High
8%
42%
18%
6%
25%
2%
50%
Don't Know
4%
14%
17%
8%
56%
1%
18%
No Answer
3%
17%
22%
8%
49%
1%
20%
Balochistan
7%
35%
21%
11%
24%
3%
42%
KP
19%
32%
18%
8%
22%
0%
51%
Punjab
5%
29%
13%
7%
43%
3%
34%
Sindh
4%
28%
29%
12%
25%
3%
32%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
473
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
5%
34%
22%
9%
28%
1%
39%
Rural
7%
28%
16%
8%
38%
3%
35%
PML-N
6%
33%
13%
5%
40%
3%
39%
PTI
8%
27%
22%
11%
30%
2%
35%
PPP
4%
23%
26%
12%
32%
3%
27%
All others
8%
29%
21%
11%
29%
2%
37%
Notes:
474
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 178: Performance of theMinistry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage

(Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Information,
Broadcasting and National
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 9%
Do Not
Know, 31%
Good, 32%
Very Bad, 7%
Bad, 18%

475
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 186: Performance of the Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National

Heritage (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Information,
Broadcasting and National Heritage
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
9%
32%
18%
7%
31%
3%
41%
Male
9%
33%
20%
9%
26%
2%
42%
Female
9%
31%
15%
6%
36%
3%
40%
Young (Under 30)
13%
34%
18%
6%
26%
3%
47%
Middle (30-50)
8%
33%
18%
7%
31%
3%
41%
Old (50+)
7%
28%
16%
7%
39%
2%
35%
Low
10%
30%
16%
8%
33%
3%
40%
Medium
10%
37%
18%
5%
27%
3%
47%
High
9%
41%
20%
6%
22%
1%
50%
Don't Know
7%
18%
16%
9%
47%
3%
25%
No Answer
3%
17%
17%
13%
44%
6%
20%
Balochistan
14%
34%
19%
10%
21%
1%
48%
KP
20%
34%
17%
8%
21%
0%
54%
Punjab
7%
34%
12%
6%
38%
3%
41%
Sindh
7%
27%
30%
9%
23%
5%
34%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
476
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
8%
38%
23%
6%
21%
3%
46%
Rural
10%
29%
15%
7%
36%
3%
39%
PML-N
9%
37%
12%
4%
36%
3%
46%
PTI
9%
30%
21%
11%
28%
2%
39%
PPP
7%
26%
24%
8%
32%
4%
33%
All others
11%
30%
21%
10%
26%
2%
41%
Notes:
477
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 179: Performance of the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication

(Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Information Technology
and Telecommunication
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 11%
Do Not
Know, 32%
Good, 34%
Very Bad, 7%
Bad, 14%

478
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 187: Performance of the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication

(Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Information Technology
and Telecommunication
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
11%
34%
14%
7%
32%
3%
45%
Male
11%
32%
18%
9%
29%
2%
43%
Female
11%
36%
11%
5%
35%
3%
47%
Young (Under 30)
14%
35%
14%
8%
27%
2%
49%
Middle (30-50)
10%
35%
14%
7%
33%
2%
45%
Old (50+)
8%
30%
17%
5%
38%
3%
38%
Low
11%
32%
13%
7%
34%
4%
43%
Medium
11%
40%
15%
7%
26%
2%
51%
High
14%
40%
17%
5%
23%
1%
54%
Don't Know
5%
23%
13%
6%
51%
3%
28%
No Answer
6%
16%
14%
13%
49%
2%
22%
Balochistan
8%
34%
25%
11%
21%
1%
42%
KP
24%
31%
12%
8%
25%
1%
55%
Punjab
10%
35%
9%
5%
38%
3%
45%
Sindh
6%
33%
24%
10%
25%
3%
39%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
479
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
13%
43%
15%
6%
22%
2%
56%
Rural
10%
30%
14%
7%
36%
3%
40%
PML-N
11%
38%
9%
4%
35%
3%
49%
PTI
12%
32%
18%
8%
30%
1%
44%
PPP
6%
25%
18%
10%
34%
6%
31%
All others
11%
33%
19%
9%
27%
1%
44%
Notes:
480
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 180: Performance of the Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Interior and Narcotics
Control
No
Answer, 3%
Very
Good, 7%
Do Not
Know, 31%
Good, 21%
Bad, 21%
Very
Bad, 17%

481
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 188: Performance of the Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Interior and Narcotics
Control
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
7%
21%
21%
17%
31%
3%
28%
Male
9%
26%
19%
17%
27%
2%
35%
Female
6%
17%
22%
16%
37%
3%
23%
Young (Under 30)
8%
22%
22%
18%
27%
3%
30%
Middle (30-50)
7%
21%
21%
17%
31%
2%
28%
Old (50+)
8%
21%
17%
14%
39%
2%
29%
Low
7%
20%
22%
17%
32%
3%
27%
Medium
8%
23%
21%
21%
26%
2%
31%
High
11%
27%
21%
15%
25%
1%
38%
Don't Know
5%
13%
19%
9%
52%
2%
18%
No Answer
3%
16%
16%
10%
49%
6%
19%
Balochistan
5%
24%
29%
24%
16%
1%
29%
KP
21%
23%
18%
13%
25%
1%
44%
Punjab
6%
21%
16%
14%
40%
3%
27%
Sindh
4%
21%
30%
21%
21%
4%
25%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
482
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
7%
22%
24%
20%
24%
3%
29%
Rural
8%
21%
19%
15%
35%
2%
29%
PML-N
8%
23%
16%
13%
38%
2%
31%
PTI
9%
22%
22%
19%
27%
2%
31%
PPP
5%
18%
26%
17%
30%
5%
23%
All others
8%
21%
25%
20%
25%
2%
29%
Notes:
483
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 181: Performance of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Resources
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 9%
Do Not
Know, 23%
Good, 31%
Very
Bad, 15%
Bad, 20%

484
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 189: Performance of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Resources
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
7 = (1+2)
9%
31%
20%
15%
23%
2%
40%
Male
9%
31%
23%
19%
18%
1%
40%
Female
9%
31%
17%
12%
29%
2%
40%
Young (Under 30)
11%
34%
20%
15%
20%
1%
45%
Middle (30-50)
8%
29%
21%
16%
23%
2%
37%
Old (50+)
9%
30%
17%
14%
29%
2%
39%
Low
9%
28%
21%
16%
25%
2%
37%
Medium
10%
36%
20%
17%
17%
1%
46%
High
11%
36%
23%
11%
17%
1%
47%
Don't Know
7%
30%
10%
15%
38%
1%
37%
No Answer
6%
14%
14%
18%
47%
2%
20%
Balochistan
6%
36%
23%
21%
13%
1%
42%
KP
20%
30%
20%
9%
21%
1%
50%
Punjab
8%
29%
18%
15%
29%
2%
37%
Sindh
6%
35%
25%
17%
15%
2%
41%

Over Pakistan
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
485
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
10%
36%
22%
15%
15%
2%
46%
Rural
9%
28%
19%
15%
27%
2%
37%
PML-N
10%
31%
17%
15%
27%
1%
41%
PTI
10%
28%
25%
12%
23%
1%
38%
PPP
4%
31%
20%
18%
24%
4%
35%
All others
9%
32%
23%
15%
19%
1%
41%
Notes:
486
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 182: Performance of the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Planning, Development
and Reforms
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 8%
Do Not
Know, 31%
Good, 32%
Very
Bad, 11%
Bad, 16%

487
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 190: Performance of the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms (Federal)
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Planning, Development
and Reforms
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
8%
32%
16%
11%
31%
2%
40%
Male
9%
32%
19%
13%
25%
2%
41%
Female
8%
32%
13%
9%
36%
3%
40%
Young (Under 30)
11%
35%
14%
11%
27%
2%
46%
Middle (30-50)
7%
31%
17%
12%
31%
2%
38%
Old (50+)
8%
29%
17%
9%
36%
2%
37%
Low
7%
29%
15%
14%
32%
3%
36%
Medium
9%
37%
16%
11%
26%
1%
46%
High
12%
38%
16%
9%
23%
2%
50%
Don't Know
7%
24%
17%
4%
46%
2%
31%
No Answer
5%
21%
14%
10%
45%
4%
26%
Balochistan
6%
24%
31%
16%
20%
3%
30%
KP
18%
30%
15%
9%
27%
1%
48%
Punjab
8%
34%
9%
9%
38%
2%
42%
Sindh
5%
31%
27%
15%
19%
3%
36%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
488
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
8%
38%
18%
10%
24%
1%
46%
Rural
8%
29%
15%
12%
34%
3%
37%
PML-N
9%
37%
9%
8%
35%
2%
46%
PTI
11%
30%
17%
13%
28%
1%
41%
PPP
6%
27%
21%
16%
26%
4%
33%
All others
8%
27%
22%
13%
28%
2%
35%
Notes:
489
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 183: Performance of the Ministry of Railways (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Railways
Do Not
Know, 22%
No
Answer, 2%
Very
Good, 13%
Very
Bad, 16%
Good, 30%
Bad, 17%

490
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 191: Performance of the Ministry of Railways (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Railways
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
13%
30%
17%
16%
22%
2%
43%
Male
17%
28%
20%
20%
15%
1%
45%
Female
9%
33%
15%
12%
29%
3%
42%
Young (Under 30)
15%
30%
18%
16%
19%
2%
45%
Middle (30-50)
12%
30%
18%
16%
22%
2%
42%
Old (50+)
13%
31%
15%
13%
27%
2%
44%
Low
10%
28%
19%
17%
24%
2%
38%
Medium
14%
34%
15%
20%
16%
1%
48%
High
19%
36%
17%
13%
14%
1%
55%
Don't Know
15%
28%
11%
8%
36%
3%
43%
No Answer
8%
17%
17%
11%
42%
5%
25%
Balochistan
9%
33%
23%
22%
11%
2%
42%
KP
22%
23%
19%
13%
22%
1%
45%
Punjab
14%
31%
14%
15%
25%
2%
45%
Sindh
9%
31%
21%
16%
20%
4%
40%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
491
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
17%
35%
18%
15%
13%
2%
52%
Rural
11%
28%
17%
16%
26%
2%
39%
PML-N
17%
30%
14%
16%
23%
2%
47%
PTI
12%
31%
21%
11%
25%
2%
43%
PPP
6%
31%
17%
14%
28%
4%
37%
All others
11%
31%
20%
19%
18%
2%
42%
Notes:
492
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 184: Performance of the Ministry of Water and Power (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Water and Power
Do Not
Know, 16%
No
Answer, 1%
Very
Good, 10%
Good, 17%
Very
Bad, 36%
Bad, 20%

493
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 192: Performance of the Ministry of Water and Power (Federal)

regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries? Ministry of Water and Power
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answe
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
10%
17%
20%
36%
16%
1%
27%
Male
11%
17%
22%
37%
11%
1%
28%
Female
9%
16%
18%
35%
21%
1%
25%
Young (Under 30)
11%
17%
21%
38%
12%
1%
28%
Middle (30-50)
10%
17%
20%
35%
16%
1%
27%
Old (50+)
10%
16%
20%
33%
19%
1%
26%
Low
10%
15%
19%
38%
17%
1%
25%
Medium
9%
20%
22%
39%
11%
1%
29%
High
16%
21%
23%
30%
9%
2%
37%
Don't Know
7%
11%
22%
23%
37%
1%
18%
No Answer
6%
16%
11%
45%
20%
3%
22%
Balochistan
2%
10%
26%
54%
5%
3%
12%
KP
21%
13%
11%
43%
11%
1%
34%
Punjab
12%
18%
19%
29%
22%
1%
30%
Sindh
4%
17%
27%
42%
8%
2%
21%

Over Pakistan
Gender-wise
Respondent Age-wise
Province-wise
494
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Location-wise
Urban
13%
15%
25%
37%
10%
1%
28%
Rural
9%
17%
18%
35%
18%
2%
26%
PML-N
13%
19%
18%
30%
20%
1%
32%
PTI
12%
8%
24%
43%
13%
1%
20%
PPP
7%
24%
21%
32%
14%
3%
31%
All others
8%
13%
22%
43%
12%
2%
21%
Notes:
495
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 185: Performance of the Provincial Department for Education (Provincial)

Question: The current Provincial Government has been in power for almost two years. Please tell us of your
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for
Education
100%
86%
90%
78%
80%
70%
61%
60%
50%
41%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
496
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 193: Performance of the Provincial Department for Education (Provincial)

Education
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
14%
47%
21%
17%
1%
0%
61%
KP
53%
33%
5%
2%
7%
0%
86%
Punjab
22%
56%
10%
3%
9%
0%
78%
Sindh
9%
32%
34%
20%
5%
1%
41%
Province-wise
Notes:
497
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 186: Performance of the Provincial Department for Health (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Health
100%
85%
90%
67%
80%
70%
60%
49%
50%
38%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
498
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 194: Performance of the Provincial Department for Health (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Health
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
10%
39%
27%
23%
1%
0%
49%
KP
43%
42%
7%
2%
6%
1%
85%
Punjab
17%
50%
17%
6%
11%
1%
67%
Sindh
5%
33%
36%
19%
6%
2%
38%
Province-wise
Notes:
499
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 187: Performance of the Provincial Department for Interior (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Interior
100%
90%
80%
57%
70%
60%
50%
39%
33%
40%
33%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
500
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 195: Performance of the Provincial Department for Interior (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Interior
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
4%
35%
27%
11%
22%
1%
39%
KP
22%
35%
13%
4%
25%
1%
57%
Punjab
7%
26%
12%
8%
46%
1%
33%
Sindh
3%
30%
37%
13%
15%
2%
33%
Province-wise
Notes:
501
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 188: Performance of the Provincial Department for Finance (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Finance
60%
56%
40%
31%
31%
24%
20%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
502
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 196: Performance of the Provincial Department for Finance (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Finance
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
6%
25%
27%
21%
17%
5%
31%
KP
29%
27%
14%
5%
24%
1%
56%
Punjab
5%
26%
16%
8%
43%
2%
31%
Sindh
2%
22%
34%
17%
23%
3%
24%
Province-wise
Notes:
503
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 189: Performance of the Provincial Department for Agriculture (Provincial)

Agriculture
60%
53%
40%
40%
22%
25%
20%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
504
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 197: Performance of the Provincial Department for Agriculture (Provincial)

Agriculture
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
4%
18%
36%
31%
8%
2%
22%
KP
21%
32%
22%
5%
20%
1%
53%
Punjab
6%
34%
19%
12%
27%
3%
40%
Sindh
2%
23%
32%
20%
19%
3%
25%
Province-wise
Notes:
505
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 190: Performance of the Provincial Department for Water and Irrigation (Provincial)
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Water
and Irrigation
60%
53%
39%
40%
22%
16%
20%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
506
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 198: Performance of the Provincial Department for Water and Irrigation (Provincial)
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Water
and Irrigation
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
1%
15%
37%
38%
8%
1%
16%
KP
22%
31%
16%
13%
17%
1%
53%
Punjab
6%
33%
18%
12%
29%
2%
39%
Sindh
4%
18%
32%
25%
17%
4%
22%
Province-wise
Notes:
507
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 191: Performance of the Provincial Department for Telecommunication (Provincial)

Telecommunication
60%
50%
35%
40%
28%
25%
20%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
508
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 199: Performance of the Provincial Department for Telecommunication (Provincial)

Telecommunication
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
3%
25%
34%
21%
16%
3%
28%
KP
21%
29%
16%
14%
19%
1%
50%
Punjab
6%
29%
9%
7%
46%
3%
35%
Sindh
3%
22%
28%
18%
26%
3%
25%
Province-wise
Notes:
509
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 192: Performance of theProvincial Department for Local Governments (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Local
Governments
60%
56%
40%
26%
34%
23%
20%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
510
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 200: Performance of the Provincial Department for Local Governments (Provincial)
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Local
Governments
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
4%
30%
32%
15%
18%
1%
34%
KP
24%
32%
12%
7%
24%
2%
56%
Punjab
5%
21%
11%
9%
51%
4%
26%
Sindh
2%
21%
32%
24%
18%
3%
23%
Province-wise
Notes:
511
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 193: Performance of the Provincial Department for Mines & Minerals (Provincial)
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Mines &
Minerals
40%
36%
35%
30%
25%
20%
18%
19%
16%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
512
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 201: Performance of the Provincial Department for Mines & Minerals (Provincial)
opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Mines &
Minerals
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
2%
17%
29%
20%
29%
4%
19%
KP
19%
17%
16%
7%
40%
2%
36%
Punjab
4%
12%
7%
7%
66%
3%
16%
Sindh
2%
16%
22%
15%
38%
6%
18%
Province-wise
Notes:
513
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 194: Performance of the Provincial Department for Forestry (Provincial)

opinion regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments? Department for Forestry
60%
55%
50%
40%
30%
24%
22%
18%
20%
10%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
514
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 202: Performance of the Provincial Department for Forestry (Provincial)

Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
6%
16%
27%
25%
22%
5%
22%
KP
24%
31%
9%
9%
26%
1%
55%
Punjab
5%
19%
13%
8%
52%
3%
24%
Sindh
2%
16%
23%
14%
41%
4%
18%
Province-wise
Notes:
515
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Figure 195: Performance of the Provincial Department for Planning and Development
(Provincial)
Planning and Development
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
48%
50%
39%
40%
29%
29%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Balochistan
KP
Punjab
Sindh
516
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Table 203: Performance of the Provincial Department for Planning and Development
(Provincial)
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Don't
Know
No
Answer
Approval Rating
2015
7 = (1+2)
Balochistan
10%
19%
30%
17%
19%
6%
29%
KP
24%
24%
17%
7%
27%
2%
48%
Punjab
17%
22%
8%
6%
44%
4%
39%
Sindh
6%
23%
24%
19%
24%
4%
29%
Province-wise
Notes:
517
APPENDICES
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Appendix A: Research Methodology

Sampling Methodology
1.
Sample Size
The sample size for this survey is 3231 Men and Women
2.
Coverage & Exclusion
The sample covered a total of 56 Districts, in all Four Provinces of Pakistan namely: Punjab , Sindh , KP and
Balochistan.
About 5% of Population living in FATA , GB and AJK was excluded from the sample universe for this survey
due to security reasons as well as inability to undertake Random Sampling methodology.
3.
Sampling Stages
a.
Definitions
Sampling Frame
The Sampling Frame for this survey was based on electoral lists updated for 2013 General Election. The
Polling Station breakdown and list of polling stations was obtained from the Election Commission of
Pakistan's (ECP) website. The electoral lists for sampled polling stations were requested and obtained
from the Election Commission office in Islamabad in hard copy form after the required payment was
made.
PSU
The Primary Sampling Unit for this survey was the polling station
SSU
The Secondary Sampling Unit for this survey was the respondent (Male or Female) randomly chosen from
the electoral rolls.
b.
Sampling Stages
Stage 1: Pakistan's National Assembly is composed of 272 National Assembly constituencies. These 272
seats are spread across 4 Provinces and FATA according to population share. Systematic Random Sampling
(SRS) method was used to select 55 constituencies from the total list of 272.
3 Constituencies falling in FATA region were dropped due to security concerns in FATA.
Stage 2: From the selected 52 constituencies (after dropping the 3 FATA constituencies) all the Polling Stations
in these 52 constituencies were listed. 4 Polling Stations were selected through Simple Random Sampling (SRS)
from each constituency.
520
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
In other words a total of 208 Polling Stations were selected falling within these 52 constituencies.
Since size of electoral constituencies in Pakistan is not uniform and can range from 100,000 voters to 600,000
voters, this method of Systematic Random Sampling gave a slight over weight to smaller constituencies at the
cost of the bigger constituencies. This can be considered as one of the limitations of the current sampling
exercise.
Stage 3: The Polling Stations were categorised into Rural and Urban polling stations with available data from
the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.
Stage 4: For each of the 3 provinces (Punjab, Sindh and KP) 16 interviews were planned in each of the PSUs,
i.e., Polling Stations. In Balochistan, 24 interviews were planned in each of the PSUs, i.e., Polling Stations.
Stage 5: Once the Polling Station and sample to be covered per Polling Station was available, two separate
procedures were employed, depending on the availability of electoral rolls or voter lists.
PSUs where electoral rolls were available: 12 Male names and 12 female names were drawn from the electoral
rolls using Systematic Random Sampling approach. In Balochistan, where interviews per PSU were 24, 18 male
and 18 female names were generated from the electoral rolls of the relevant PSU, i.e., Polling Station.
Using the address and name available, the required respondent was searched by interviewers. In case of lack of
availability of selected person, the person was replaced with another one from the 24 (or 36 in Balochistan)
available with the interviewer. In other words, substitution of respondent was handled by drawing an
oversample from the list.
A total of 24 Constituencies (out of 52) followed this method. In other words, around half of the sample survey
responses followed this method.
PSUs where electoral rolls were either unavailable or were found to be incomplete.
In these PSUs, a Random Walk Approach with a random starting point was used. The interviewer first listed all
the available landmarks around the Polling Station. He/She used a random number generator to select one
random location and then used the 'Right Hand Rule' to select first household. Within the household(HH)
selected, KISH Grid was used to select a random member of the HH who was the interviewed.
In case of lack of availability of the selected person the entire HH was replaced instead of interviewing from the
same HH.
A total of 28 Constituencies (out of 52) followed this method.
4.
Achieved Sample Profile
The profile of the achieved sample is as follows
521
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Sample Profile
PILDAT Survey Data
Count
3,231
100
100
Urban
1,032
32
33
Rural
2,199
68
67
Balochistan
285
KP
414
13
14
1,778
55
58
754
23
24
1,652
51
52
1,579
49
48
909
28
42
1,747
54
40
561
17
19
No education/Unqualified
1,002
31
25
Religious education/Cleric
214
<1
Primary
418
13
26
Matric (High school)
844
26
20
F.A / FSc (Intermediate)
355
11
Graduate
315
10
Professional education
(Doctor/Engineer)
14
<1
No formal education but

can read and write
40
15
No answer
12
BASE:All
Area
Name of province
Punjab
Sindh
Gender of the respondent Male
Female
Age Groups
Young (Under 30)

Middle (30-50)
Old (50+)
Education
Nationally
Representative
Sample / Census
Comparison
Diploma
Source : 1998 Census information PSLM Data 2013-14
522
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Age
Young: Under 30 years of age; Middle: Between 30 and 50 years of age; Old: Above 51 years of age
The achieved sample is very close to National Demographics as measured in the Census of 1998 and Demographic
Profile emerging from the Pakistan Social and Living Measurement Survey (PSLM 2013-14).
However, there are a few deviations in the Provinces (Balochistan has been given a larger representation, almost twice
its size whereas Punjab's share has been reduced by about 4 percentage points). Similarly, the profile of this sample is
slightly less youthful than the National Demographics and also slightly more educated than the National
demographics.
5.
Weighting of Data
Since the deviation in Sample Profile and National Demographics is deemed by PILDAT as not very large, data has
not been weighted and the figures reported in this study are based on the Sample Profile shared above.
Disclaimer: The Urban / Rural division of Polling stations has been done based on the
available information. In some areas Polling Stations have mixed populations, i.e.,
Urban as well as Rural Households. An estimation has been used to put these Mixed
Polling Stations into Urban or Rural if greater population lived in either Urban or Rural.
In other words, a small minority of Households in Rural areas may have been categorised
into Urban respondents and vice versa. It is assumed as one of the crucial limitations of
the current sampling approach.
6. Error Margin Calculation

The Error Margin for this survey is calculated to range between +-2-5 % at 95% Confidence Interval.
Due to larger cluster size at the PSU level (16 and 24), the design effect for the study would be slightly larger than 10
interviews per PSU, which is generally the norm for polling in Pakistan.
7. Field Work Force
A mixed team of male and female interviewers was used.
The total team comprised 74 individuals
The basic qualification for interviewers was Graduation, mostly unemployed people were selected but about 50%
were experienced in interviewing.
8. Field Dates
The field work for this survey was conducted during June 02 June 12, 2015.
9. Other Protocols followed
Briefing/Training of interviewers:
Briefings were organised for the interviewers on the designed questionnaire in two days training sessions at each
Provincial Capital (Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar and Quetta). The interviewers were instructed on measures such as:
523
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
1. Following sampling/quota instructions properly

2. Ethical code of conduct towards interviewers
3. Following skipping Instructions and other interview instructions on the Questionnaire
4. Maintaining neutrality in asking questions
Mock Calls
After the briefings were completed, all the field workers made mock calls under the direct supervision of an
executive or a fieldwork supervisor. This ensured that the field workers properly understood the
instructions and could handle various interviewing problems during the interview (in the field). After
completion of mock calls, a debriefing session was arranged in which the problems faced by the
interviewers during the mock interviews were discussed and solutions suggested and recorded.
Initial Checking/ Intake Edit
After the training, the interviewers went into the field for actual interviewing. A team comprising one male
interviewer and one female interviewer worked under the supervision of a Field Supervisor. Field
Supervisors observed at least 3 interviews of each interviewer for quality assurance. In case the work of an
interviewer was not acceptable, he/she was disengaged from the survey. Field Supervisor was responsible
to check the filled-in questionnaires before passing them to data coding/entry department. The problems or
missing information identified during field edit were explained to the relevant interviewer and he/she was
instructed to rectify them either through telephone and/or revisit the respondent for clarification and reasking the missing questions.
Supervision & Back Checking
Interviewers were supervised on the job and the work done by them was back checked. At least 20% back
checking was done on work completed by each interviewer to ensure authenticity of data.
Data Entry and Verification
Once the questionnaires were received from the field, those were checked and the responses of open-ended
questions were coded with the help of a code list.
After the coding of open-ended responses, data was entered into computers. PILDAT used the SPSS data
entry programme that has flexibility to implement validity checks and skipping rules, etc. At least 20 % of
its entered data was rechecked for the quality assurance.
After completion of data entries, all data was cleaned by using a data-cleaning program written in SPSS
which is customized for every project according to the survey/questionnaire needs. Data was thoroughly
checked for an omission, displacements and other errors resulting in inconsistencies with the coding
scheme.
Acknowledgements
While PILDAT team was responsible for drafting of Research Design, implementation of field work, data
entry at PILDAT office and Data Processing, the Gallup Pakistan (affiliate of Gallup International in
Pakistan) provided assistance in elaboration of Research Design and assessing the Research Design with
respect to International Standards of Opinion Polling as followed by ESOMAR and WAPOR (International
governing bodies for survey firms).
524
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Appendix B:
Questionnaire
Questions 1-11, Question 58 and Questions 69-78 in the overall PILDAT Questionnaire used for Public Opinion
Survey correspond to the section on Quality of Democracy and are contained in that report
Law &Order
Q12a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the practical measures by
the Federal Government to maintain Peace, Stability and Order (such as raising and maintaining an effective police
force) please tell us if the Government's performance has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 12b: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years. Regarding
the practical measures by the Provincial Government to maintain Peace, Stability and Order (such as maintaining and
raising an effective police force) please tell us if the Provincial Government's performance has been very good, good,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Poverty Alleviation
Question 13a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the issue of
bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
525
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Education
Question 14a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding improvement of the
education scenario (such as, literacy rate, children's enrolment and the overall improvement in the quality of education,
etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
improvement of the education scenario (for example, literacy rate, children's enrolment, and the overall improvement in
the quality of education, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Health Care
Question 15a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the improvement of
healthcare facilities (such as control of different diseases and their treatment, provision of inexpensive medicines, etc.),
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
the improvement of healthcare facilities (such as control of different diseases and their treatment, provision of
inexpensive medicines, etc.), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
526
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Transparency
Question 16a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the improvement of
transparency and public access (such as making it mandatory for each Ministry and Government Institutions to inform
the public through placing its Annual Development Plan, Budget and Performance Report on its website), please tell us
if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
the improvement of transparency and public access (such as making it mandatory for each Ministry and Government
Institutions to inform the public through placing its Annual Development Plan, Budget and Performance Report on its
website), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till
now
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Energy Production & Management

Question 17a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the improvements
in the electricity situation in the country (such as adequate), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government
has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
527
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Question 17b: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years.
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Anti Corruption
Question 18a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding eradication or
minimisation of corruption and improving the performance of related institutions such as NAB, Federal Ombudsman,
etc., please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
the eradication or minimization of corruption, and improving the performance of related institutions such as the
Provincial Department for Anti Corruption, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 19a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding increase in local and
foreign investment, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very
bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
528
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
increase in local and foreign investment in the province, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Tax Collection
Question 20a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding improvement in tax
collection, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till
now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
improvement in tax collection, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 21a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding ensuring collection
of utility bills (such as electricity and gas bills), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been
1. Very Good
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
9. No Answer
529
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Question 21b: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years.
Regarding ensuring collection of utility bills (such as water and sewerage bills), please tell us if the performance of
the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 22a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding reduction in
unemployment, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till
now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
reduction in unemployment, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 23a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding the effectiveness of
development projects (such as cost effectiveness, improving quality and timely execution) of development projects,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
530
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
the effectiveness of development projects (such as cost effectiveness, improving quality and timely execution) of
development projects, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Quality & Independence of Civil Service

Question 24a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding ensuring that
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
ensuring that bureaucracy and its actions remain independent of political influences and encroachments, please tell us if
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Merit-Based Recruitment and Promotions

Question 25a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding merit-based
recruitments and promotions of Government employees, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
531
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
merit-based recruitments and promotions of Government employees, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Clean, Efficient and Economic Public Procurements

Question 26a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding ensuring
transparency in public procurements by the Government (such as Government expenditure on any Government related
goods, services or construction, etc.) by the Federal Government, please tell us if the performance of the Federal
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
ensuring transparency in public procurements by the Government (such as Government expenditure on any
Government related goods, services or construction, etc.) by the Provincial Government, please tell us if the
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
532
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015

Question 27a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding effective use of
technologies for better governance and to provide trainings to Government employees in the use of technologies, please
tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 27b: The current Provincial Government of your province has been in power for almost two years., Regarding
effective use of technologies for better governance and to provide trainings to Government employees in the use of
technologies, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad
till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Management of Supply of Agricultural Inputs

Question 28a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding fair and efficient
procurement and distribution of agricultural inputs (such as fertilizers, pesticides, tractors and other agricultural
machinery), please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till
now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
fair and efficient procurement and distribution of agricultural inputs (such as fertilizers, pesticides, tractors and other
agricultural machinery), please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government has been very good, good, bad or
very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
533
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Question 29a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding reduction in
environmental pollution (for instance keeping air and water from being polluted), please tell us if the performance of the
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
reduction in environmental pollution (for instance keeping air and water from being polluted) please tell us if the
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know

Question 30a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Regarding managing natural
disasters, or managing circumstances that arise as a consequence of natural disasters, please tell us if the performance of
the Federal Government been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
managing natural disasters, or managing circumstances that arise as a consequence of natural disasters, please tell us if
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
534
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
vaccination to control the spread of diseases, especially the anti-polio drive, please tell us if the performance of the
Provincial Government been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Devolution of Powers to the Lower Tiers-Establishment of Local Governments

Question 32a-a: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us whether
the performance of the Federal Government in establishing Local and Regional Government in Federal Areas (such as
Islamabad, Cantonments and FATA) has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 32a-b: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Devolution of Powers to Lower Tiers-Distribution of Resources to Provincial and Local Governmets

Question 32b-a: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us whether
Federal Government's performance regarding fair distribution of financial resources among the Provinces has been
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
535
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Question 32b-b: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
please tell us whether the Provincial Government's performance regarding fair distribution of financial resources
among districts and various Local Governments has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Devolution of Powers to Lower Tiers-Effective Devolution of Power

Question 32c-a: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us whether
the Federal Government's performance in making Provincial Governments autonomous after the enactment of 18th
amendment has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Question 32c-b: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
please tell us whether the Provincial Government's performance in making use of the autonomy devolved to it after the
enactment of 18th amendment has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know

Question 33a: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us that with
regards to making the judicial system effective (such as induction and adequate training of sufficient state prosecutors,
use of new technology for investigation purposes, prompt appointment of judges against vacant vacancies), has the
Federal Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
536
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Question 33b: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Provincial Government of your province,
sufficient state prosecutors, use of new technology for investigation purposes, prompt appointment of judges against
vacant vacancies), has the Provincial Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
National Security
Question 34: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us that with
regards to effective execution of national defence and security policies, has the Federal Government's performance
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know

Question 35: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us whether the
Federal Government's performance regarding the foreign policy has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Performance of Regulatory Bodies-Independece and Efficiency

Question 36a: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us that with
regards to making regulatory bodies independent and effective (such as PEMRA, OGRA, NEPRA, State Bank, etc.)
has the Federal Government's performance been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
537
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of Regulatory Bodies-Merit-Based Appointments

Question 36b: Keeping in view the two years performance of the current Federal Government, please tell us that with
OGRA, NEPRA, State Bank, etc.) based on merit, has the Federal Government's performance been very good, good,
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Management of inflation
Question 37: In your view of the Federal Government's performance over the past two years, with regards to controlling
inflation, please tell us if the performance of the Federal Government has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Water Resources Development and Management

Question 38: In your view of the Federal Government's performance over the past two years, with regards to the
improvement and management of water resources, please tell us if the Federal Government's performance has been very
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Public Transport
Question 39: In your opinion of the Provincial Government's performance during the past two years, with regards to
improvement of public transport (such as busses, etc.), please tell us whether the performance of the Provincial
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
538
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Access to Safe Drinking Water Supply

the provision of clean drinking water, please tell us whether the performance of the Provincial Government of your
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Sanitation (Sewerage, Solid Waste Collection & Disposal)

improvement in the sanitation system (such as sewerage and solid waste collection), please tell us if the performance of
the Provincial Government of your province has been very good, good, bad or very bad till now?
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
8. Do Not Know
Water Resources Development and Management

improvement in the irrigation system, please tell us if the performance of the Provincial Government of your province
1. Very Good
9. No Answer
2. Good
1. Yes
2. No
539
3. Bad
4. Very Bad
9. No Answer
8. Do Not Know
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Comparative Position with respect to Zardari

Question 51: If you compare Nawaz Sharif's Government with Asif Ali Zardari and his Government, do you think the
performance of Nawaz Sharif's Government has been better, worse or there has been no difference?
1. Better
9. No Answer
2. Worse
3. No Difference
8. Do Not Know
Comparative Position with respect to Musharraf

Question 52: If you compare Nawaz Sharif's Government with Pervez Musharraf and his Government, do you think
1. Better
9. No Answer
2. Worse
3. No Difference
8. Do Not Know
540
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Future Possibility
Question 53: In your opinion, what are the chances that Nawaz Sharif, during his current tenure, will be able to perform
well in solving the following problems?
A lot of
chance
Somewhat
chance
Little
chance
No chance
at all
Do not
know
No
answer
Improvement of Economy
Improvement of Peace and

Stability
Controlling terrorism
Decreasing Unemployment
Poverty Reduction
Improving relations with the

United States of America
Improving relations with India
Improving relations with

Afghanistan
541
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Trust in Institutions
Question 57: Please tell us to what extent do you trust the performance of these institutions?
Sr
A lot Somewhat
Less
Not at
all
Do
No
not Answer
know
a. National Accountability Bureau (NAB)
b. Government Officers
c. Armed Forces
d. Police
Performance of the Prime Minister

Question 58: What is your opinion of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's overall performance over the past two years?
1. Very good
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very bad
8. Do not know
9. No Answer
542
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of the Chief Ministers

Question 59: What is your opinion about the overall performances of the Chief Minister of Punjab, Chief Minister of Sindh,
Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Chief Minister of Balochistan for the past two years?
Very
good
Good
Bad
Very
bad
Do not
know
No
Answer
.a
Chief Minister Balochistan
.b
Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
.c
Chief Minister Punjab
.d
Chief Minister Sindh
543
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of the Provincial Governments

Question 60: What is your opinion about the performance of the Provincial Governments after the General Election 2013?
Very
good
Good
Bad
Very
bad
Do not
know
No
Answer
.a
Government of Balochistan
.b
Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
.c
Government of Punjab
.d
Government of Sindh
Question 68: In your opinion, what is the biggest current issue of Pakistan?
Issue:_________
8. Do not know
9. No Answer
544
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of the Federal Ministries

Question 79a: The current Federal Government has been in power for almost two years. Please tell us of your opinion
regarding the two years performance of the following Federal Ministries?
a.
Ministry of Commerce
Do
not
Know
8
b.
Ministry of Defence
c.
Ministry of Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs, Statistics

and Privatization
d.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
e.
Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage
f.
Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication
g.
Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control
h.
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources
i.
Ministry of Planning, Development and Reforms
j.
Ministry of Railways
Ministry of Water and Power
545
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
No
Answer
9
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
546
P I L D AT
Report

October 2015
Performance of Provincial Departments

Question 79b: The current Provincial Government has been in power for almost two years. Please tell us of your opinion
regarding the two years performance of the following Provincial Departments?
Very
Good
Good
Bad
Very
Bad
Do
not
Know
No
Answer
a.
Provincial Department for Education
b.
Provincial Department for Health
c.
Provincial Department for Interior
d.
Provincial Department for Finance
e.
Provincial Department for Agriculture
f.
Provincial Department for Water and Irrigation
g.
Provincial Department for Telecommunication
h.
Provincial Department for Local Governments
i.
Provincial Department for Mines & Minerals
j.
Provincial Department for Forestry
Provincial Department for Planning and Development
547
Islamabad Office: P. O. Box 278, F-8, Postal Code: 44220, Islamabad, Pakistan
Lahore Office: P. O. Box 11098, L.C.C.H.S, Postal Code: 54792, Lahore, Pakistan
E-mail: info@pildat.org | Website: www.pildat.org

Public Opinion On The Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Public Opinion On The Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Public Opinion on

Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Detailed Indicators on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Figures and Tables

Figure 6: Performance of Federal Ministries

Figure 8: Law and Order (All Over Pakistan)

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Figure 26: Disaster Preparedness and Management (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 38: Law and Order (Balochistan)

Figure 66: Law and Order (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Figure 72: Anti-Corruption (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)

Figure 94: Law and Order (Punjab)

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Figure 121: Water Resources Development and Management (Punjab)

Figure 122: Law and Order (Sindh)

Figure 164: Performance of Prime Minister (All Over Pakistan)

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Figure 169: Performance of Provincial Government of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 173: Biggest Current Issue in Pakistan (All Over Pakistan)

Figure 185: Performance of the Department for Education (Provincial)

Table 1: Core Governance Indicators

Table 10: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance-Federal Government

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Table 21: Utility Bills Collection (All Over Pakistan)

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Table 70: Water Resources Development and Management (Balochistan)

Table 100: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance-Punjab

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Table 129: Report Card on Public Opinion on Quality of Governance- Sindh

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Table 172: Performance of Prime Minister (All Over Pakistan)

Table 177: Performance of Provincial Government of Punjab (All Over Pakistan)

Table 181: Biggest Current Issue in Pakistan (All Over Pakistan)

Table 182: Performance of the Ministry of Commerce (Federal)

Table 193: Performance of the Department for Education (Provincial)

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Awami National Party

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Public Opinion on Quality of Governance in Pakistan

Table 1: Core Governance Indicators

Law and Order

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Measures the public opinion on Government's success

Gauges the public opinion on the level of openness

Energy Production and Management

Measures the public opinion on the current state of

Measures the public opinion on Government's success

Measures public opinion on Government's

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Utility Bills Collection

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Measures the public opinion on effectiveness of the

Quality and Independence of Civil

Measures the public opinion on Government's

Merit-based Recruitment and

Measures the public opinion on Government's