Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOISE POLLUTION:
Noise is one of the most pervasive environmental problems. There is no
doubt that it has adverse effect on human beings, and their surroundings.
The sound does not get perceived by the human ear in the same manner over the
whole audible frequency range. Low-pitched sound of high intensity level (decibel
count) could not be judged by the human ear to be particularly loud. Similarly, the
human ear has been incapable of perceiving vibrations of a frequency much above
20,000 cycles per second, although many animals such as dog have been able to
detect these sounds. In industry, increased mechanization results in increased noise
levels. Operation of textile machines carries a high risk of hearing loss. The
evaluation of textile workers noise induced hearing loss was reported elsewhere in
the literature.
Respiratory modification
Gastrointestinal
Endocrine stimulation
Galvanic skin resistance alteration
Permanent or temporary hearing loss
Increased human annoyance
Communication interference resulting in reduced workers efficiency
Heart ailments
STITCHING
The stitching unit itself yields a high level of noise pollution which have an
adverse effect on the health of the worker and also decreases the efficiency of the
worker. An average level of 85 dba of noise is generated by a single stitching
machine working at its full pace. No w a days in developed world countries they
have somehow achieve 5 - 7 dba noise reduction achieved on numerous stitching
machines at very low cost, reducing workers noise to below 80 dba.
REMEDIAL MEASURES
Noise level can be lowered by the use of noise control enclosures, absorbers,
silencers and baffles and by the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), such
as earmuffs.
Where technical methods are insufficient, noise exposure may be reduced by
the use of hearing protection and by administrative controls such as limiting the
time spent in noisy environment and scheduling noisy operation outside normal
shifts or at distant location.
Even though noise-reducing measures may have been incorporated in the
design of the machinery, greater output may generate higher noise levels. For
instance, every doubling of the speed of rotary machines the noise emission rises
by about 7 dB, warp knitting looms by 12 dB and in fans by around 18 to 24 dB.
Noise pollution is a problem that has unsatisfactorily been tackled so far.
Though noise-absorbing sheets are used to cover the inner walls of loom shed, still
more appropriate means need to be devised. In modern shuttle less looms because
of better engineering designs of the machines the noise level is lesser. But those
shuttles less looms are costly.
In addition to that management must take measures, such as job rotation to
ensure each of the worker stays healthy and we see the impacts of noise pollution
very less.
REFERENCES:
www.scribd.com
http://www.betterfactories.org/content/documents/1/Chapter
%204%20%20Temperature,%20Ventilation,%20Noise%20and
%20Lighting%20_OSH%20manual.pdf
www.wikipedia.org
Mr. Rehan sayed (compliance manager rajby industries)
4 | Page
Objectives
Effects of organic solvents and heavy metals on the inner ear have not been adequately
determine the extent of potentiation of noise induced hearing loss by simultaneous exposure to
chemical agents and the dose-response relationship.
establish protocols for field studies of combined chemical and noise exposure effects on the
auditory and vestibular systems.
determine the effects of environmental exposure to lead on children's auditory central nervous
system
determine the effect on the auditory system of exposure to chemicals with and without physical or
psycho-social stress
Evaluate individual risk factors for hearing and balance disturbance in the work environment
CONCLUSION
As a society, our history is filled with failures to recognize the agents that
cause disease; once the causes have been recognized, we have responded
reluctantly, slowly, and often inadequately. The case with tobacco is an instructive
one. It took many years of lobbying by dedicated individuals before legislators and
the general public recognized the links between the hazards of tobacco smoke and
disease; as a result laws were finally enacted and behaviors changed accordingly.
Despite the evidence about the many medical, social, and economic effects
of noise, as a society, we continue to suffer from the same inertia, the same
reluctance to change,and the same denial of the obvious that the anti-tobacco
lobby faced a couple of decades ago. This inertia and denial are similar to those
that delayed appropriate action on lead, mercury, and asbestos. Now we seem
unable to make the connection between noise and disease, despite the evidence,
and despite the fact, which we all recognize, that our cities are becoming
increasingly more polluted with noise.
Noise makers and the businesses that support them are as reluctant as
smokers to give up their bad habits. Legislators at all levels should protect us from
noise pollution the same way they protected us from tobacco smoke and other
forms of pollution. It is clear that laws can change behaviors in ways that benefit
society as a whole.
5 | Page