Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D. TAUS1
I. TUNS1
84
D
24.00
24.00
24.00
512.00m
512.00m
6 7
10
11
12
TF. GALATANU et al.: The improvement of behavior to vertical forces for structural roof
Table 1
C%
Si%
Mn%
P%
S%
Cu%
0,159
0,149
0,198
0,35
0,76
0,85
0,02
0,028
0,0025
0,0030
0,171
0,245
85
86
Force[kN]
Deplacement[mm]
Fig. 5. The load- displacement curve
To consider the materials ageing effect, a
10% reduction of mechanic characteristics
of the steel of the structural elements was
considered.
2.2. The structural analysis
metallic roof trusses
of
the
TF. GALATANU et al.: The improvement of behavior to vertical forces for structural roof
N t ,Rd N pl ,Rd
A fy
87
(1)
M0
z
z
y
where:
A = area of the raw cross section;
fy = yielding stress;
M0 = partial coefficient of safety for the
resistance of the cross sections indifferent
of the sections class;
For every compressed element of the
steel truss were established [3]:
The value of cross sections resistance
to compression:
N c ,Rd
A fy
(2)
M0
N b ,Rd
a) The upper chord cross section;
b) The lower chord cross section;
c) The cross-bracing cross section;
Fig. 6. The cross sections of the elements
For every element of the steel truss with
a traction strain were established[3]:
The value of the plastic strain in the
raw cross section:
A fy
M1
(3)
where:
= the reduction factor for the buckling
form considered;
M1 = partial coefficient of safety for the
resistance of elements to buckling;
The trusses schematization and the knots
numbering is represented in Figure 7 and
strains obtained for simply supported beam
and continue beam on three equal spans
are presented in Table 2.
0
0
7
0
00
70
20
2
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
5
1
88
[kN]
[kN]
[kN]
[kN]
Nt,Ed
[kN]
[kN]
10
11
12
Degree of safety
NRd/NEd
Nt,Ed
Tens
ion
CompressionNb,Ed
Nt,Rd
Degree of safety
NRd/NEd
Maxim
strains
Maxim strains
Tensio
n
Continue beam
1;3
46
81
0.599
1409
845
432
1.96
-545
3;5
13;1
5
15;1
7
46
81
0.599
1409
845
1026
0.82
352
46
81
0.599
1409
845
1081
0.78
609
46
81
0.599
1409
845
496
1.70
-82
74
47
84
0.599
1665
999
1387
0.72
786
5;7
11;1
3
47
84
1665
1436
0.70
47
56
1561
0.84
9;11
47
56
0.785
1665
1607
0.81
937
102
4
110
3
1.07
7;9
999
130
8
130
8
0.599
0.785
4
54
34
0.785
724
569
-713
1.02
-853
0.85
54
34
0.785
724
569
-824
0.88
-817
0.89
3;4
15;1
8
46
36
0.843
724
611
621
0.98
742
0.82
46
36
0.843
724
611
612
1.00
600
1.02
3;6
15;1
6
68
36
0.712
470
335
-429
1.09
-534
0.88
68
36
0.712
470
335
-424
1.11
-418
1.12
57
38
0.785
574
451
657
0.69
519
0.87
57
38
574
451
411
1.10
405
1.11
5;8
13;1
4
89
37
385
219
-254
1.52
-342
1.13
89
37
0.785
0.569
8
0.569
8
385
219
-249
1.55
-244
1.58
7;8
11;1
4
76
39
0.662
470
311
246
1.27
332
0.94
76
39
0.662
470
311
241
1.29
236
1.32
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1;
4
17;1
8
5;6
13;1
6
Supports
diagonal
The diagonal
Freely supported
beam
Compression
Nb,Ed
Buckling
Nb,Rd
Slendern
ess coeff.
Tension
Elem
.
type
The design
forces
resistance of
cross sections
Reduction
factor
Elemente
Nr.
crt.
Mechanic characteristics, strains and insurance coefficients for the 24,0 m span roof
trusses
Table 2
1665
13
2.58
2.40
1.39
11.4
1.27
1.28
1.19
TF. GALATANU et al.: The improvement of behavior to vertical forces for structural roof
94
39
22
7;10
11;1
2
385
208
-97
33
3.98
-177
2.17
39
0.539
0.539
9
94
385
208
-101
35
3.81
-88
43
4.37
23
9;10
99
41
0.512
385
197
-36
68
2.91
156
1.27
24
9;12
99
41
0.512
385
-131
2.95
-152
2;4
22
13
0.984
1193
OK
0
115
7
2.53
25
197
117
5
26
4;6
43
75
0.662
1193
790
777
1.53
251
3.15
27
6;8
1193
1246
0.96
-451
2.64
28
8;10
10;1
2
12;1
4
14;1
6
16;1
8
18;1
9
1398
1507
0.93
-780
1.79
1398
1561
0.90
-898
1.56
1398
1557
0.90
-896
1.56
1193
1300
0.92
-673
1.77
1193
0
117
5
838
1.42
-257
4.64
OK
642
1.83
29
30
31
32
33
21
89
22
13
0.984
1193
1.02
90