Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1966
HANSEN,
H.
llilpiw
mmmmmm
H 6$82K
Hill
HARRY. JAMES HANSEN
118111
H6fflffiiw8ftffl
"
1
Hffl^'"''"'
IbBi
'""'"'"
''
SHflSrSSflK
''
'-'I'''
'
:''"
SB
POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL*93940
MONTEREY, CALIF.
^,^fj
-
ltefl
ABSTRACT
improved over like devices in that loading may be varied while the
The
high speeds.
however, the first phase of operation will call for a speed of 1800
RR1.
W*rary
7
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Ernest K. Gatcombe for the many valuable suggestions he made as consultant for design and for his constant encouragement during the entire
project.
Postgraduate School and special mention is due Mr. Henry F. Perry for
the care and skill shown in the fabrication and assembly of the machine.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
1.
Introduction
2.
Design Specifications
15
3.
16
4.
Hydraulic Assembly
26
5.
Lubrication Systems
43
6.
60
7.
70
8.
Bibliography
85
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
Page
1.
13
2.
14
3.
Drive Shaft
24
4.
25
5.
30
6.
Ram
31
7.
32
8.
Piston
33
9.
35
10.
36
11.
37
12.
38
13.
39
14.
Internal Nut
40
15.
41
16.
Ram Nut
42
17.
51
18.
Oil Tank
52
19.
Hydraulic Tank
53
20.
Gasket
54
21.
Tank End
55
22.
Tank Top
56
23.
57
24.
58
Page
Figure
25.
59
26.
65
27.
66
28.
View Port
72
29.
Bearing Adjuster
73
30.
74
31.
75
32.
Base Plate
76
33.
77
34.
Side Panel
78
35.
Side Panel
79
36.
Hood
80
37.
81
38.
82
39.
83
40.
84
41.
88
42.
Drive Gear
89
43.
Helical Pinion
90
44.
Test Gear
91
LIST OF TABLES
Table
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
Page
"0" Ring Groove Dimensions
34
49
50
66
67
68
69
1.
Introduction.
Man's desires and ambitions have always been far in advance of the
New vistas of
These demands
have been felt in the lubrication field and much research is being con-
All these
things should be measured by some kind of numbers so that useful comparisons may be made. /12/
In any research endeavor there are instruments for evaluating the
products developed.
of operation the machine will be run at 1800 RPM to evaluate its perform-
ment over other similar devices using hydraulic loading in that there are
11
no rotating seals.
shown to acquaint the reader with the instrument before considering the
into the design of the main and test gear shafts, hydraulic assembly,
lubrication systems, control and hydraulic system, and supporting structure respectively.
In studying the various drawings in each section, the reader will
the material presented are photo reductions of the plans used to fabri-
12
,v.
33SSS8
*3
If
i.
UiU
as
sal
Eel
aaas5t
13
14
2.
Design Specifications.
The design criteria used in this project consisted of the follow-
ing
three specifications:
(1) The instrument must be capable of operation at speeds up
15
3.
ception of the spline area the maximum diameter of the shafts is two
inches.
seal clearances, gear hole size and drive motor shaft diameter.
The
dimensions are noted on drawing numbers S501 and S502 and reflect the
choice of standard commercially available components.
In choosing the
shaft bearings, the largest size bearings, consistent with the two inch
The test gear shaft was made with a one half inch internal bore
over its whole length.
The torque
measuring strain gages which are part of the control system, are mounted
on the test gear shaft; and the strain gage leads are brought into the
shaft through radial holes.
far from the gages so that they will not influence the gage readings in
any way.
Both the motor coupling and the test section gears are attached to
the shafts with shear pins.
The maximum
tolerances placed on the shafts to affect a partial oil seal and to maintain the alignment of the test section gears.
B'
C = 250 111
F.
K - 1.5
m
K
111
17
Distance between the center of the test gear and the center
of the test end bearing.
L = 2.56 in.
s
Bending moment.
Factor of safety,
Load on gear.
n
W,
c<
Deflection of shaft.
<*>
o<
T,d
Ill
O"
Ol
/2/
^)
18
1.03.
/2/
Helix angle.
1}/~
If
12.6 degrees.
In figuring the effects of loading in the following calculations, the dynamic loading as proposed by Buckingham was used.
This was
0.05v (FC + W
W,
0.05v
+ (FC + W
n)
,
(.05)(2730) f(.375)(250) + (1000) ]
- (1000) + (.05)(2730) + [(.375)(250) + (1000)]*
* 1880 pounds.
Using the value of dynamic load the tangential force and the applied
torque are
- W cos^>
n
T = W R
The torque imparted to the shafts by the test section gears is the same
as that from the loading gears.
The
factor of
moments around the test end bearing gives a drive end bearing radial
load of
F.R
1
as
B(a + b) + W,(b
19
+ W J (b
F,R
1
(a
)
s^
b)
(392#)(2.9IN) + (1880#)(14.40XW
(3.50IN + 14.40IN)
2.56IN )
1300 pounds.
F,R
R
B
Wja
a
Wj(a + b + L
a
W J (2a + b + L )
s'
_ _d_
(a
B'(a
b)
F.R
1
b)
(392#)(2.9IN )
2440 pounds.
This loading is higher than that recommended for the design speed.
It
must be remembered that the effect of loading above the limit set by the
not a steady phenomena and the value represents a maximum reached periodically, it would not be fair to evaluate bearing life from this factor alone.
lubrication system.
Having established that the bearing loads are within acceptable limits
the next step is the determination of the maximum stress in the shaft.
The maximum stress will occur just outside of the end bearing and consists of a torsional and bending moment component.
20
<D
D >
t
( 3.1416)(1.
32
0.5
4
)
(32)
0.492 inches
4
.
r u 5g
J
m (1.2)(5120#IN)<0.75IN)
(0.492 IN
pgi
M = W L
CT m
2)(4800IN)(0.75IN)(1.65 )
(0.492 IN*)
^ 3QQ
^,juu
psi.
When considering the effects of fatigue and reversed bending in the design
of a rotating shaft the ASME code specifies the use of the maximum shear
stress theory.
Solving
/2/
(K T)
16
rjra
d>*>
Q61
=
o " (22500) (3. 1416) (1
z
2
f ..
K M +
(1.0 )(5120
-
->2
2
)
.5*/D^)
o
(1
2
.5
/dM
(8)
_2,
v
+ nji>)~}
^ ,,
^F.Dfl
__* 10
1*
J
dimension used so that an even greater margin of safety than the above
theory gives is achieved.
21
The last item to check is the shaft deflection and verify that it
is less than the allowable deflection of 0.001 inches.
The deflection of
the shaft is made up of three components and the solution will be done
by superposition.
Wd
Figure 3.1
cause a slope at the right end.
e, -
a(r2
2
-
31EJ
1880)(3.5)(17.9
2
-
3.5
2
)
= L 0.
si
The load on the right has two effects; the first is that of a tip load
on a cantelever beam and is
&
2W L
d s
3EJ
2)(1880)(2.56
3
)
0.00152 inches.
This load also produces a couple at the right hand support which gives
an angle of
22
Q2
^s
3EJ
2)(1880)(2.56)(17.9 )
6
(3) (30 x 10 )(.492)
0.00190 radians.
This leads to a second downward deflection of
<5
- L
s
0.Z
- 0.0049 inches
23
85
85
CSlH
~T
11
ii
S3
So
31
-5
if
PS
s*
Rfl
24
25
"i
4.
Hydraulic Assembly.
The machine is loaded by an annular shaped hydraulic cylinder that
The system is somewhat unique in that the
that one of the rods shown is hollow and that the other has a
The assembly is supported on one end by the six piston rods which
are attached to the bearing hanger block B202, and on the other end by
When the design was started the machine was to have had a four inch
center to center distance for the shafts, and the hydraulic assembly was
designed accordingly.
from a larger cylinder would be lower pressure requirements for the system.
ing hardware.
26
While not shown in the drawings, the ram nut, Hill, and the end
justments to be made to the ram bearing and simplify the assembly of the
unit.
Table
The inner wall, H105, and the outer wall, H104, were provided with
a tapered entrance to facilitate the insertion of the piston and cover
the inner wall and end member, H110, were welded together that they
in a better design.
Using the design load the maximum pressure requirements for the
system are developed.
A
P
F.
27
W
W
5F x
]>F
JA
Coefficient of friction.
= 0.15 111
^
Iff
Helix angle.
Iff 12.6 degrees
Figure 4.1
Summing the
ZF
W
t
+juW
*^ n sinV
Y
= W
W cosT/
n
(cosy -/iSinV)
= (1000#) (0.936
Taking the sum of the forces in the "x" direction and solving for the
force F 1 results in a value of
ZF x
F
l
V^t
"^ uW
28
cos
w sinV -
?
l
=624
pounds.
Before calculating the required system pressure, the piston area and the
reduced area due to rod interference must be determined.
tively
fr
(D
D >
. A
3.00
2
)
2
.
m
4
(4)
= 11.58 in
( 3.14)(4.87
= 10.41 in
= 11.58
WO-l*^-*^ 2 )
(4)
2
.
With these areas the pressure required to affect loading may be found.
Two pressures were calculated because, as will be explained in the control and hydraulic system portion of the design, the machine may be
"
(11.58
52)
= 54 P8i '
(10.41 i N 2)
" 59 ' 9 P si *
The following thirteen pages are devoted to the drawings for this
section.
29
d
z
OO
X X X X XI
in
oooo
00
*-
T-l
3
*
-j
uu
or
-I
_)
LJ o
u
QQ
1O CO
1 2 a: LJ a iz
O
a 2
DC a: z
Ld
oU u o oE < Z
z o
Q
z
mZ
< z
Z
-1
30
o a a u
ro
(0
00 0)
31
32
'
"
88K> 10
==*
-y==i
TO
>-
<
Q
/>
33
TABLE I
"0" RING GROOVE DIMENSIONS
BREAK CORNERS
PISTON
OUTER
GROOVE
PISTON
INNER
GROOVE
END PLATE
ROD
GROOVE
.210
.210
.210
.210
.103
.005
i .005
.005
.005
.003
GROOVE DEPTH, F
TOLERANCE
.188
+ .000
.188
+ .000
.173
+ .000
-.001
.173
+ .000
.090
+ 000
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
GROOVE LENGTH, G
TOLERANCE
.280
.280
.280
.280
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
MINIMUM RADIUS, R
.050
.050
.050
.050
.020
DRAWING NUMBER
H103
H103
H102
H102
H102
34
"^"
-f
**.*.
.1
,... ! ..-
CD
M
i
b.
"D
CO
o
z
c\J
i
CO
35
-^
36
QK
^jw
Ul
O
z
00 <D
oo
O
8
OQ CO
CVJ
a
u
u.
o L.
2 i
u DO
>
o
o
I
cvi
CD
2?
MW^N
'
37
J?
a
<
u
<fc
I
h
Q
Z
tIO
Ul
O
N.
m
o
<
^
<D
co go
0. CVJ CM
Ld
1
u
>
8
38
z z
<* o
CM CM
z> :d
01
(D
1=4
,LEN<=
LxJ
Z)
Ou
*^t CM
B&H
8
Id
CD (O
oo
or
Ul
^
r
"
Q
Ul
> LJ
o
Ljr-
8
I
oo
CO QO
l-
UJ
O
u
L.
oy
o <su5
I
#S^
ao
ttB&
39
UJ
a:
c\/
CO
I
8
i
<
UJ
DC
40
41
J
.:
<
cvi
I
Lu
O
i
<
ui
or
42
5.
Lubrication Systems.
There are two separate lubrication systems provided in the design.
The main system serves the helical gears, and the five tapered roller
bearings; the test system provides lubricant solely to the test gears.
mainly to heat the fluid to the testing temperature before the machine
is started.
ed by the fluid in lubricating the gears and bearings and thus maintain
a uniform supply temperature.
tures above 250F heaters may be added between the pump discharge and
the nozzles in the test section.
tanks are easily accessible on a sliding plate which forms the lower
/10/
43
box to step up the drive shaft speed is lubricated by the main system.
Ryder states that sufficient oil to carry away 60,000 BTU/HR is required when operating at 10,000 RPM with a drive power of from forty to
the heat exchangers that are installed have a greater capacity than that
ed in the bypass lines which will ensure flow around the heaters and pro-
regulated precisely by the two needle valves located in the main and
bypass lines.
A relief valve
is*
the controls.
The system constants are tabulated in Table II, and the system para-
C
P
SS C
P SS
'
P 0il
44
E = 4.50 HP
h'
LMTD
Heater power.
S
- 5000 watts,
/ll/
07.
V_ Q
ss
w_.
10.0 in.
0il
w - 4.0 GPM
w
AT
111
AT
ATL
^ss
calculations, the sump tank volume, capacity, weight, and surface area
plus the weight of the fluid in tank must be computed.
tively
whl_ =
179ft
i/zo
10 IN)<6 IN)(23 IN ) =
3
.ouu it
"\
"\
(1728 I1T/FT )
i
c m
=5.0
w
gallons
2
=
ss
'^SS
1728
f wh + wl + hi]
(1728 IN /FT
3
)
= 16.0 pounds
[
"
2wh + 21h + Iw ]
144
(144 IN /FT
= 4.36 ft
46
w^-iZoil
011
5.0 GAL)(53.1#/FT
(7.481 GAL/FT
7.481
3
)
=36 2pounds
.
ATH
This results in a
wrtJ ,C
hours for
/ll/
-..
AT + w
Oil p Oil
H
3412
&TH
C
SS pSS
L
S
1000
( 36.2)(.479)(106)
+ (16.0)(.110Hl06 )
406)
(1000)
(3412)
= 1.001 KW HRS.
From this value a heater was selected that would heat the fluid in less
than thirty minutes.
and corresponds roughly to the time it might take to prepare for an experi-
mental run.
in
_
60Q
T "
Q
s
( 60
"
,,
"
(2.5 KW)
mln
It is noted at this point that the test system time is shorter even
though
AT was
greater.
ri
AT H
The heat exchanger calculations were made assuming that the input
power of 7.5 horsepower would be given up as heat to the oil.
It was
further assumed that the main section would absorb 4.5 horsepower and
47
changers that were selected have a higher capacity than is needed initially.
water flow rate must be increased when the input power is increased.
The first step is the determination of the temperature rise in the
This will then be the number of degrees that
AT,
011 P
Oil
(
4.5HP)(7.48 GAL/FT
(1GAL/MIN) (60MIN/HR)
(2545BTU/HP HR )
3
)
= 55F.
Assuming a cooling water flow rate of four gallons per minute, which is
the minimum flow rate for the type of heat exchanger used, gives a change
in water temperature of
at
ttl
/7/
E
500 w
( 4.5HP)(2545BTU/HP HR )
(500)(4.0GAL/MIN)
"
"
,U F *
With these two temperature differences the IKTD for a counterflow heat
exchanger may be determined from tabulated values.
/7/
of 112 the area required may be found and a suitable heat exchanger chosen.
A -
(IJMTD)U
= 1.02ft
4.5HP)(2545BTU/HP HR )
(112)(100BTU/HR FT^F)
2
.
TABLE II
CONSTANTS USED IN LUBRICATION SYSTEM DESIGN
MAIN SYSTEM
TEST SYSTEM
4.360
4.360
FT
5.000
5.000
GALLONS
0.110
0.110
BTU/#F
0.479
0.479
BTU/#F
4.500
3.000
HP
4.000
4.000
GPM
1.000
0.600
GPM
436
436
2500
5000
106
195
275
275
BTU/HR-FT F
0.800
0.800
FT
0.036
0.036
FT
16.0
16.0
POUNDS
36.2
36.2
POUNDS
UNITS
2
Oil
Oil
%
AT H
W
ss
SS
'Oil
49
WATT HOURS
WATTS
3
3
TABLE III
MAIN SYSTEM
TEST SYSTEM
UNITS
2
3.70
2.50
LMTD
112
115
24
18
MINUTES
1.029
1.576
KWATT HRS
55.0
60.0
6.0
4.0
50
FT
"
-**
o
H
o
55
J
o
co g
>
52
o
o
-J
oa
H
CO
CO
5
K
M
o o
M
at
to
o o
51
-.
3BQ]
52
53
-j
RUBBER
UJ
POSTGRADUATE.
CAL1K
-^
O
~+
_i
--
-f
ii
MONTEREY,
lJ
^^
'
NAVAL
O(9lO(0
i/3
o
u
z>
1
a
bJ
a:
o
4
<
^
4
'
>
M
u
T*
Jj*
*-
_L
1
t
1
/
4
**
1
-s'
54
h-v
"^
-Nh
o
>r*
;*
f4
xo
55
1
u
<
-J
o
o
X
c/)
a
!jE
CD
I-
2u
3?^
x
o
a:
u5<
O
a
z ojr-i: i^Q'H
0)
<
56
o
Uj
Sd
57
f.
i
%
V,
58
! a
r
i
r\
ID
<P
rT^T
N
_-
TIT
7X
59
34T
6.
The
total load is proportional to both the torque on the shaft and the axial
While
Two ninety degree strain gage rosettes are bonded to the shaft as
shown in Table IV.
The leads from the gages are lead to radial holes two
inches from the gages and into the middle of the test gear shaft.
From
the center of the shaft they are run to a slip ring assembly on the end
of the shaft.
of Table IV.
tion and elimination of the effects of axial and bending strains, as well
as minimizing inaccuracies due to contact resistance variations.
/6/
temperatures and for this reason must be covered with a protective coating.
listed conditions it resists attack from oils and chemicals, absorbs shock
and vibration and is easy to apply.
60
loading by adding the tabulated value for the desired loading to the
zero reading of the meter.
the pressure on the piston by adjusting the needle valve controls with the
An unloading as well as a
loading cylinder is needed because although the system will tend to unload by itself, friction is still present and will prevent the complete
self unloading.
necessitate the zero position of the helical pinion being shifted to the
center of the drive gear instead of on one end.
operation provides another good reason for strain gages to be employed instead of a position indicator in the control scheme.
The pump unit chosen has a maximum capacity of one tenth of a
gallon of fluid per minute, and a maximum pressure of eight hundred pounds
per square inch which is well within the safe load carrying capacity of
the tubing and fittings.
loading and the high pressure will allow for any conceivable loadings
that may be attempted.
In using the control system and in planning the design, strain readings and pinion displacement information are required.
61
The calculations
that follow are for the design load using a 0.375 inch face width test
The following symbols are used in the calculations for this section.
gear.
D.
1
Shear modulus.
G - 12,000,000 psi.
/15/
R
P
P
s
Helix angle.
- 12.6 degrees
"\ff
Shear strain.
inch outside diameter portion of the test gear shaft the first value
62
^ Do
"
4
)
32
( 3.14)(2.0IN
0.5IN
4
)
(32)
- 1.565 in
4
.
^o
.
( 2900 # IN) (2 IN )
2JG " (2)(1.565IN^)(12 x 10 PSI)
= 155 ^uin/in.
If a type "N" strain gage indicator is used as planned, the gage factor,
F, will be set in and therefore will not appear in the calculations.
A four gage bridge will mean amplified strain readings and thus strain
The reading is also corrected for the trans-
verse sensitivity of the gages themselves however, in this case the correction is negligible.
Reading -
^^.
<fi^l_
= 619
/6/
^volts.
In determining the axial movement of the helical pinion the total angular rotation of the shaft is found to be
TL
**
"
GJ
'
m 23.2 x 10
-4
radians.
2<^R
4
= (23.2 x 10" )(2)(2.9 IN)
4
= 136 x 10"
in.
rstan^f
(
V
136 xlO
IN ) = n n , n .
0.0601 in.
/n oooc\
(0.2235)
63
This is a rather small displacement and might tempt one to use a smaller
helix angle.
/10/
On the following five pages are found the system block diagram,
64
52
o
J
PC
H
o
M
65
TABLE
IV
>o.3
12 3%
x -1 -1 -1
-11-11
-111
if
1-11
11-1
Mx
My
Mr,
1-1-1
-^
-*f
STATIONARY
ROTATING
1
66
TABLE
RED
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
1.07
HARDNESS
SHORE A DUROMETER
33
TENSILE STRENGTH
350 PSI
ELONGATION
*+00
BRITTLE POINT
-90
LINEAR SHRINKAGE
1%
THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
.12 BTU-FT/HR FT 2 F
COEFFICIENT OF
THERMAL EXPANSION
15
DIELECTRIC STRENGTH
500 VOLTS/MIL
DIELECTRIC CONSTANT
2.8
10^ IN/IN
@ 60 CPS
dissipation factor
.0026
@ 60 CPS
volume resistivity
maximum temperature
3
*
1
xlo ^ ohm-cm
6oof
67
TABLE VI
NORMAL
FORCE
-P-0
LOADING
LB/IN
METER
READING
-^ VOLTS
53.33
106.67
11.59
23.17
UN OS-
20.00
MO. 00
213.33
266.67
320.00
JL40iKL
-3-73.33
160.00
180.00
200.00
.2 20 ..0-0240.00
260.00
280.00
*no r OO
426.67
480.00
533.33
_620^-CuX
640.00
660.00
680.00
_7D0*.00_
720.00
740.00
760.00
_zao.*.oo_
800.00
820.00
840.00
_860^OO_
880.00
900.00
920.00
_940.0_0_
960.00
980.00
1000.00
46.34
57.93
69.51
81.1092.68
104.27
115.85
127.44139.02
150.61
162.19
_586.67-
3520.00
340.00
360.00
*P.n T nn
400.00
U20.00
440.00
460.00
460.00
500.00
520.00
540.00
560.00
580.00
600.00
34.76-
160.00-
_6O-0O80.00
100.00
120.00
640.00
693.33
746.67
ftnn t rm
-800.00.
853.33
906.67
960.00
lni
*,^
013.33
1066.67
066.67
1 120.00
173.33
1226.67
226.67.
1280.00
1333.33
336.67
J 440. 001493.33
1546.67
1600.00
1653.33
1706.67
1760.00
1813.33
1866.67
1920.00
1973.33
2026.67
?080.00.
2133.33
2186.67
2240.00
173
173.78.
t 7R
185.37
196.95
54
208.
208.54
220.12220.
12
231.71
243.29
254.88
266.46
266.46.
278.05
239.63
301 .22
312.80-
324.39
335.98
347.56
359.15
370.73
382.32
393.90
405.49
417.07
428.66
440.24
451.83463.41
475.00
486.58
.2-293 ^3i
498-17-
2346.67
2400.00
2453.33
509.76
521.34
532.93
-2-506.67
544*-51_
556. 10
2560.00
2613.33
2666.67
567.68
579.27
68
TABLE
VII
'
SUMP CAPACITY
3 GALLONS
PUMP CAPACITY
MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS
360 POUNDS/INCH 2
CONTROL VaLVE
BYPASS VaLVE
SELECTOR VaLVE
FILTER
69
7.
feet in length, welded to quarter inch steel plates that are bolted to
upper and lower platform to which the various system components are atThe lower platform is composed of two sliding sections; this
tached.
tion for the lubrication and hydraulic systems are mounted on this lower
platform.
plate.
Both the lower platform, and upper are made of one inch aluminum
and B203, are attached to the base plate with pins and screws.
At first
glance the hangers appear oversize but because of the large twist in-
support for the hydraulic assembly and are a housing for the bearing adjusters, B201.
hangers appear as one piece, however they are a two piece assembly.
70
The
the base are for the oil pans, L301 and L302.
silicone rubber splash flaps are installed above, and extending into the
pans.
They are held in place by the same silicone compound used before
metal junctions.
The sides, B206 and B207, and the top, B208, are fabricated from one
This was chosen for both strength
and meters are mounted on this panel and marked with tape labels.
The following thirteen pages contain the various drawings for this
section.
71
72
-r
n-
iij
111
r-i
I
I-
O
5
5I
U
Z
O
i
\-
u
z.
<
o
a ui
>
<O
o
x
*h
io io
73
74
75
If
r
e
i*
vp
r;
l J.
>-
O
z
in
o
>--t
I-
00
Oil
III
O
I
I0.
CQU
<vlO
8
d
iv
*u
CD
Jo
a:
qcD
<ar
UluJ
Ego
^<n
76
Jy
xs
"***
:;
58
SCHOOL
6 o
^r
CALIF.
IOIO
1
tot-
IS
-I
POSTGRADUATE
'
.J
MONTEREY
NAVAL
ouzo*
'
3
I
K1
1
SCREWS
CAP
1
*/e
BETWEEN
FOR
*
4
HOLES
SPACING
4"
1
t
1
CLEARANCE
-1
SCREWS,
M
1
77
CD
b.
JO
te.
u
LJ
if
O
u
1 >u
ow
UJ
JKf
IQ
f -1
-f
.5
78
i:
If)
*J
il
-t<-
79
.1*^.^,^,. _,.
"s-i-lh
hs-t
fa
>;>>
<*
'N*
'8
in i-
5?
jt_
_i
XT
<r>
to
8
bi
80
U.S. NAVAL
POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
MONTEREY, CALIF.
DWG. NO. L30J
Ol L PAN TEST SECTION
MATERIAL STAINLESS STEEL
SCALE : HALF SIZE
DRAWN BV
JL
Qy\
19 FEB. 1966^
,
JW
81
>.
82
<0
83
-J
Y2*
\
_
<n
SCH
*
UJ
IO
Olf
ro
o .t^cd
LJ 0)
CALIF.
POSTGRADUATE
o
z
t7
..
Z V"
Of0 x
^
zz<"z
Ve
Vft
o
o
a
MONTEREY
NAVAL
iff
S.
5
*t
(0
>
3F
_j, i
-K
*U
<*
*>
""
T^x
V\,
1
Xv
//
^X X
\
\D
V }C- _
-_
^5 '*
o
UJ
a:
O
s
or
AX
X^
o
>
N
-
64
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Motion Measurement
2.
Faires, V. M.
Macmillan,
1965.
3.
Holman, J. P.
4.
5.
LeGrand,
R.
Heat Transfer
McGraw-Hill, 1962.
McGraw-Hill
1955.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Personal correspondence with C. Vernon Iverson, Western Gear Corporation, January 1966.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Ryder, E. A.
v.
15.
ASTM Bulletin
Lubrication Engineering
16.
85
APPENDIX
GEAR DATA
G70*f
HELICAL
DRIVE
G701
HELICAL
PINION
G702
0.5625
0.375
*f.000
2.000
PITCH DIAMETER
5.7795
5.7795
5.800
5.800
NUMBER OF TEETH
65
65
68
68
NORMAL PRESSURE
ANGLE
20
20
20
20
ifc
12 18 33
12 18' 33"
TRANSVERSE PRESSURE
ANGLE
20 25 55
20 25 55
TRANSVERSE PITCH
11.72*4-13
11.72*+13
OUTSIDE DIAMETER
5.9877
5.98^7
5.9877
5.98V7
5.9667
5.9617
5.9667
5.9617
5.^309
5M09
5.^309
5.^351
5.^351
NORMAL CIRCULAR
TOOTH THICKNESS
0.1^0
0.1*1-25
O.i^fO
0.1^25
0.129*+
0.128*f
0.129*+
0.128*+
WHOLE. DEPTH
0.2083
0.2083
0.1958
0.1958
DRIVE
GEAR
G705
TEST
GEAR
FACE WIDTH
HELIX ANGLE
86
it
As a check on the maximum stress on the gear teeth the Lewis equa-
tion is solved.
b - 0.375 in.
F,
Kf
1
s
s
Ultimate stress.
s - 174 ksi for 9310 steel.
u
HI
Y = 0.721
Wf
bY
stress of
m (1880)<12) (1.4) m
(0.375)(0.721)
^'.u
00Q
P"--
ksi
From
this it would appear that at higher speeds and thus higher dynamic loads
that a wider faced test gear be used and thus stay below the endurance
The drawings of the four gears are presented on the next four pages,
87
oo
/
88
89
.-.
,..
-n
ft
ii
90
91
APPENDIX II
OPERATION
t}ie
safe
i. Start
92
3.
UNLOADING PROCEDURE
a.
If.
SHUTDOWN PROCEDURE:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
93
for
1.
No. Copies
20
Library
Monterey, California
3.
Professor E. K. Gatcombe
Mechanical Engineering Department
U. S. Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
4.
5.
6.
7.
Department Files
Department of Mechanical Engineering
U. S. Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
8.
94
Unclassified
Security Classification
title,
body
ol ebatract
mud
R&D
6e entered whan (he overall report ie claaailied)
I.
2a.
REPORT SECURITY
Unclassified
U.
Monterey, Calif.
C L ASSI Fl C A TION
2b CROUP
N.A.
REPORT TITLE
Design of a Four Square Gear/Lubricant Research Instrument
3-
4.
II
rat
HANSEN, Harry,
ol report
nam*,
J.
initial;
REPORT DATE
7a.
May 1966
a.
CONTRACT OR SRANT
NO.
16
tRf*;
N.A.
N.A.
PROJECT NO.
76 NO. OF REFS
9b.
OTHER REPORT
thla report)
N.A.
10.
AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
MLl
12.
N.A.
13.
N.A.
ABSTRACT
The gear or lubricating oil test instrument described incorporates the four
square principle in its design. This basic configuration is improved over like
devices in that loading may be varied while the machine is in operation and
rotating seals have not been used. The elimination of the need for these seals
allows prolonged operation at high speeds. The machine will be capable of
operation at 10,000 RPM however, the first phase of operation will call for a
speed of 1800 RPM. The device has two separate and complete thermostatically
controlled lubrication systems; this gives the option of testing lubricants in
the main, as well as the test section.
The test section is provided with an
observation port which is easily removed to change or service the test gears.
The rig as a whole was designed for reliability of operation and ease of maintenance.
DD
FORM
1
JAN
64
1473
95
Unclassified
Security Classification
Unclassified
Security Classification
LINK B
LINK A
14-
KEY WORDS
HOLE
ROLE
LINK C
WT
ROUE
WT
Four Square
Lubricant Test Instrument
Gear Test Instrument
INSTRUCTIONS
ORIGINATING ACTIVITY:
the report.
2a.
all
(2)
26.
is specified in
DoD
(3)
(4)
ized.
If
covered.
5.
AUTHOR(S): Enter the name(s) of author^) as shown on
or in the report. Enter last name, first name, middle initial.
The name of
If military, show rank and branch of service.
the principal author is an absolute minimum requirement.
REPORT DATE:
total
NUMBER OF REFERENCES:
page count
i.e.,
enter the
S.
8d.
of this
"All distribution of this report is controlled. QualDDC users shall request through
ified
lL
tory notes.
ABSTRACT:
8a.
86, 8c,
(5)
9*.
"U.
DDC
3.
6.
DDC"
Di-
4.
Enter the
offi-
96.
It
There is no limitation on the length of the abstractever, the suggested length is from 150 to 225 words.
14.
AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES: Enter any limitations on further dissemination of the report, other than those
10.
DD
FORM
1
JAN
64
How-
1473 (BACK)
Unclassified
96
Security Classification
thesH20125
The design
JHL
mmm
mm
*w
mm
mm
mm. SKOTOOoSSf
Mmam
wwxm
"','-,
MM
isMsiiHw.
mm
Km
Hi
WSm
\Smv
mBBsatnffifl
WfoWm
'i'.M'I
miiWii
<M*ajw
m&
W.BW*
il
WH
wi
ra
Wffil
W w$
II