You are on page 1of 10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

What will happen in 2016?


Space explorers, genetic scientists, US voters, terrorists and hackers look set to dominate our world
next year but dont rule out the odd pleasant surprise
Alex Hern, Jon Henley, Dan Roberts in Washington, Tom Phillips in Beijing, Shaun Walker in Moscow,
Julian Borger, Ian Sample, Owen Gibson, Helena Smith in Athens and Mark Rice-Oxley
Thursday 31 December 2015 03.04GMT

Never make predictions, especially about the future. So said Mark Twain, Yogi Berra or
Niels Bohr or possibly all three.
But if you must, there are really only two options: play safe and go for the obvious, or come
up with forecasts so giddily optimistic that no one will take you seriously.
Using the former approach, 2016 will produce more tragedy in Syria and Yemen, an
uninterrupted stream of refugees into Europe, another iteration of the Grexit crisis,
deepening drought in the Chinese east and American west, and further hacking
misadventure on both state and corporate levels. And an awful lot of summits to try to deal
with all of the above.
Corruption will continue to excoriate three-quarters of the worlds polities leaving the
vast majority of humanity disillusioned and increasingly unlikely to vote. Ditto sport. The
global economy is due another rout, probably starting in Asia.
But lets leave room for a little optimism. There will actually be fewer wars in 2016 than for
many years. And while the Koreas are unlikely to reunify, Cyprus might. Elections for two
of the top jobs in the world in the US and at the UN could produce women in both for the
first time. Science will tell us more than we ever knew about our ancestors, ourselves and
our universe.
The powerful mixture of birth control and rising prosperity that levelled off birth rates in
western societies in the postwar period will continue to take root in Africa, putting
downward pressure on overall population levels. We might not get to 11 billion people
after all.
And away from the headlines, the overwhelming majority of people will continue to lead
decent, unremarkable lives undeflected by the pulses of pessimism that tend to pollute our
overall sense of wellbeing. Who knows, perhaps we will even start to realise that happiness
does not reside in social media, and 2015 will go down as the year of peak-share.
Or maybe thats just too over-optimistic.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

1/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

The US election
Predicting the course of US politics over the next 12 months is a mugs game. The battle for
the White House which has already been raging in the media for months will
undoubtedly dominate. But it has barely begun in the minds of the electorate, who have
until 4 November to make a choice that will reverberate around the world.
The Republican field has been led most recently by two improbable outsiders, Donald
Trump and Ben Carson, who look as likely to eventually stumble as they ever have. So far,
they continue to make fools of pundits who underestimate the anti-establishment
groundswell.
Barack Obamas natural heir in the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, is a surer bet: safely
ahead now of the leftwing challenger Bernie Sanders in the polls and showing more
resilience in the face of once worrying email allegations. Her vulnerability to Sanders more
authentic populism remains troubling, however, for a frontrunner who lost to Obama eight
years ago and has yet to ignite the excitement that a potential first female president might
expect.
But on the assumption that harsh political reality will eventually overcome the anger on
the right and idealism on the left, it is possible to see a plausible narrative emerging for
2016.
The Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary in February will play their usual quirky role
as starting bells rather than bellwethers in the long nomination contest to come.
The Tea Party champion Ted Cruz could upset Trump to win Iowa and begin the slow
descent of the billionaires ego-inflated balloon. Marco Rubio stands a chance of beginning
his ascent to the top of the polls by taking New Hampshire.
The Democratic race will be at its most competitive. Sanders may still take one or two early
states before hitting the higher hurdle of Clintons southern firewall in March.
It is in these 10 Super Tuesday states that the Republican party machinery and money will
begin to work its muscle too rallying behind a candidate such as Rubio to appeal to the
broader electorate.
Those months of fighting Trump will have taken their toll, though, and Rubios reputation
as a pro-immigration unifier will have taken a severe pounding.
What is left of his youth and charisma will be pitted against Clintons experience and the
chance to make history by electing both a woman and a tough commander-in-chief.
The best prediction is that these predictions will be wrong. My next best bet? Clinton pips
Rubio in a squeaker.
Dan Roberts in Washington

China
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

2/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

According to the Chinese zodiac, 2016 heralds the year of the monkey, an auspicious time
for expectant parents hoping for quick-witted sprogs.
For the Communist party chief, Xi Jinping, who completes three years as president in
January, the omens are less promising. Thus far, Xi has built a reputation as one of Chinas
most dominant leaders in decades: a super-sized centraliser whom headline writers call Big
Daddy Xi.
He has cemented his grip on power with a ferocious assault on political rivals that has
dragged some of the partys most feared and influential figures through the mud and into
jail. He has set about restoring the Middle Kingdom to the centre of world affairs, pursuing
an increasingly audacious foreign policy and attempting to reforge Chinas role within the
United Nations.
In September, the Chinese president celebrated his apparent supremacy by throwing a
bombastic military parade at which nuclear missile launchers and thousands of troops
paraded through Tiananmen Square.
Yet for all Xis swagger, there was mounting evidence in 2015 of his weaknesses and those
of the 87 million-strong party he leads.
There was the mismanaged stock market rout, an affair so badly handled that Xi reputedly
lambasted top financial officials when he was pictured on the cover of the Economist
desperately attempting to prop up plummeting stocks.
I didnt want to be on that cover, Xi fumed. But thanks to you, I made the cover.
There were the catastrophic Tianjin explosions a tragedy some described as a Chinese
Katrina which devastated lives and exposed deep-rooted problems of government
corruption and incompetence. All the while, lurking just beneath the surface, was the near
constant rumbling of political intrigue that has long threatened to tear the Communist
party apart.
Those rumblings will intensify in 2016 as rival factions step up their opposition to Xis anticorruption campaign and his stewardship of a rapidly sagging economy.
Facing growing political pressure from within, Xi will look to foreign policy and his
domestic security apparatus to ensure public support. He will stoke up nationalism by
further ratcheting up tensions in the South China Sea, already the scene of a controversial
island-building campaign that has put Beijing and Washington at loggerheads. He will
continue to escalate his war on corrupt Communist party tigers aiming to snare perhaps
his biggest victim to date in the second half of the year.
And, with 2016 marking 50 years since the start of Chairman Maos tumultuous Cultural
Revolution, the few who dare to speak out against Chinas Big Daddy will face even harsher
treatment as Beijing seeks to stifle any criticism of the party he leads.
Jubilant couples will pack maternity wards as China enters the year of the monkey. But for
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

3/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

Xi it threatens to prove an annus horribilis.


Tom Phillips in Beijing

The digital world


For people with computers, which is most of us, 2015 wasnt great. But next year is
probably going to be much, much worse.
The catastrophic data breach of the extramarital dating site Ashley Madison is currently an
outlier in the history of hacking: for perhaps the first time, the information that was leaked
was extremely personal, and damaging in its own right. You cant change your passwords,
or warn your bank, to stop a marriage being wrecked by the fact that you were trying to
have an affair.
But as we entrust ever more personal data to the cloud, breaches of this sort are inevitably
going to increase. Connected home CCTV, direct message histories, chat transcripts or
photo messages could all be devastating on a personal level if leaked.
So what good news, then, that the British government intends to force internet service
providers to retain communications data for a full year. Because the experience of
TalkTalk, which was allegedly hacked by a group of teenagers applying the 20-year-old
technique of SQL injections, surely shows that there is no risk at all in doing so.
But not every hack is pranksters or criminal enterprise. The coming year will also be the
year that cyberterrorism comes of age sort of.
Experts have been warning about the lack of security around industrial control systems for
years. The networks that control power plants, national grids and reservoirs rely heavily on
obscurity to defend against attack: they arent directly connected to the internet, and use
arcane coding. But that obscurity cannot be a long-term defence.
In the end, though, we perhaps have more to fear from sheer bad luck than we do from
dedicated attack. As the pseudonymous security researcher the Grugq points out, no
hacker in history has ever been as successful at disrupting power to American homes as the
squirrel that scampered into a substation in California and caused a power cut for 45,000
people.
Alex Hern

Brexit
By this time next year, Britain may very well have voted to leave the EU. There is, of course,
no certainty about this. But let us consider the evidence.
First, the timing of the vote. Most observers agree that David Cameron will not delay his
long-promised referendum beyond next year, because he has nothing to gain from it.
Neither France nor Germany will be making new concessions in 2017, because both will by
then be embroiled in big elections. So best get it over with: in September, probably.
Next, the nature of the debate. The in and out campaigns will argue numbers how many
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

4/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

jobs might be saved by staying, how many immigrants kept out by leaving, what will be the
impact on GDP but for many voters, Europe is not about numbers. Its a question of belief.
This is a debate largely impervious to fact.
And those who believe Britain would be better off out are edging ahead. Look at the polls: a
year ago, the stay camp was in front by margins of up to 25%. That gap has now narrowed
to between two and four points, and three of the past eight polls have the leave camp
ahead. The trend seems clear.
The unspoken assumption may be that most dont knows will back the status quo, but
precedent shows that when a vote is about the EU, voters lash out. Here, Ukip won last
years European elections; on the continent, every recent referendum on an EU issue bar
one has ended in a no.
Whats more, in none of those countries were the press and governing party even remotely
as Eurosceptic as in Britain. In the UK, the stay campaign is swimming against a decadesold tide of populist anti-EU sentiment relayed by an influential wing of the Conservative
party and much of the media.
The prime minister has succeeded in reducing what he wants in the way of reform to a
bare-bones list of demands, many of which the EU may even agree to. But the real issue is
whether those demands will satisfy his own party, and succeed even temporarily in
turning back that Eurosceptic tide.
With record numbers of EU citizens arriving in Britain, further Schengen zone terror
possible, a second summer of refugee and migrant chaos probable, a well-funded out
campaign gathering pace, and much of the media having made up their minds, it will be a
tight vote.
Until Cameron, his cabinet and, perhaps more crucially, Boris Johnson say soon, often and
unequivocally that Britains future depends on its remaining in the EU, I know where Id
put my money.
Jon Henley in London

Science
For all the uncertainty about the outer limits of scientific knowledge, some events and
advances are firmly on the 2016 calendar.
In January, the UKs fertility regulator will consider the first application from British
scientists to use a gene editing procedure called Crispr-Cas9 on human embryos. The team,
led by Kathy Niakan at the Francis Crick Institute in London, will manipulate the genes of
embryos donated to research to learn more about embryo development.
In April 2015, Chinese scientists became the first in the world to announce they had used
the tool to modify abnormal human embryos, to investigate whether they could correct
faulty genes that cause a rare blood disorder, beta thalassemia. Expect gene editing to
notch up some big successes in the year ahead, and become central to a debate on the
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

5/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

ethics of genetically modifying human beings with changes that pass on to future
generations.
The fourth rock from the sun provided one of the most exciting science stories of 2015,
when Nasa discovered flowing water on Mars, or at least the regular formation of damp
patches on crater walls and gullies. Where the water is coming from, and how much there
is, are big questions for 2016. The mystery of Martian methane will also keep researchers
busy. Nasas Curiosity rover has measured spikes in methane levels near the surface, but
whether the gas is emanating from rocks or subterranean Martian bugs is unknown. In
March, the European Space Agencys ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter will blast off on a mission
to help find the answer. It will sniff the atmosphere for minute levels of methane and other
gases and, with luck, shed light on the source of Martian methane.
In September, the team behind Bloodhound, Britains 1,000mph rocket car, will ship the
extraordinary vehicle to South Africa for test drives on an old lake bed called Hakskeen Pan.
During the runs the driver, Andy Green, hopes to get Bloodhound up to 800mph over a 12mile stretch using only one rocket. A cluster of three rockets will be used for the landspeed
record attempt later on.
Just as genetics challenges our future, it unveils our past. Next year, researchers in
Germany hope to study DNA from a 400,000-year-old human relative found in a cave in
northern Spain. Their analysis, along with tests on other remains, could shed light on new
forms of early humans that used to live alongside our direct ancestors.
The human story will be richer for it.
Ian Sample in London

Russia
Vladimir Putins 16th year in charge of Russia is perhaps the most unpredictable yet. The
air force is engaged in an operation outside the borders of the Soviet Union for the first time
in a generation, Russias proxies in Ukraine have been left in the uneasy limbo of a semiceasefire, and the Russian economy is creaking as oil prices stay low.
Heres how Vladimir Vladimirovich might imagine a dream year as hes drifting off to sleep
in his palatial residence: Russian jets continue pounding all manner of rebel groups in Syria
while the Kremlin vaunts its anti-Islamic State resolve. Irritation in the west turns to
grudging respect and an agreement with Putin that Bashar al-Assad will remain in charge as
the best of a set of bad options. In Kiev, infighting and corruption paralyse the government;
the pro-rebel territories are pushed back into Ukraine but give Russia a permanent veto
over Kievs policies; the west accepts this, forgets about Crimea and ends the sanctions. Oil
prices go up, the rouble stabilises and sky-high approval ratings last through the autumn
parliamentary elections.
Putins beleaguered foes would suggest a different scenario: a fragile international alliance
over Syria breaks down over obviously disparate aims, and western sanctions over Crimea
and Ukraine are extended. The economy continues to tank, real wages fall. The middle
class, shorn of the weekends in Europe and consumer goods it was used to, becomes edgy,
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

6/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

while workers pushed to economic dire straits begin serious protests a flicker of which
was visible at the end of 2015 as long-distance truckers went on strike.
Both of these scenarios are eminently possible; what actually happens will probably be
somewhere in the middle. How Russia makes it through 2016 and beyond, until the 2018
presidential election when Putin is expected to stand again, will depend on so many things
from the oil price, to the prevailing international mood and Putins personal health.
Making predictions about Putins Russia is hard because the system is brittle and
unpredictable. Events such as the revolution in Ukraine or the Turkish shooting down of a
Russian jet can completely change policy vectors and outcomes.
Putins system, lauded by Kremlin strategists for its stability, is in fact remarkably
unpredictable, partly because it is entirely dependent on the one man at the top of the
pyramid. Putins disappearance for a week in spring, and his aides refusal to admit that he
had a bout of flu, caused unease and speculation that provided a glimpse into what could
happen if the leader were ever seriously indisposed.
Shaun Walker in Moscow

Sport
In 2009, when Rio won the right to stage the Olympics, it was sold as a feelgood coming out
party for a nation fast becoming one of the worlds powerhouses. The rhetoric ran that
South Americas first ever Games would turbocharge redevelopment of Rio de Janeiros
creaking infrastructure and tap into Brazils booming economy. It hasnt quite turned out
like that.
As the Olympics approach, nervousness over whether the venues will be ready in time has
decreased but has been replaced by worries over everything from police brutality to an ever
widening corruption scandal and an economic slump that has led to fears over ticket sales.
Budgets have been trimmed and the sense of optimism that pervaded the bid has been
replaced by something close to foreboding. Yet there is not the same level of public outrage
that was directed at the World Cup in Brazil, and the likelihood is that the citys famous
vitality will see it through.
Whether the promised improvements to Rios infrastructure materialise as billed is another
question entirely. And it is one that should worry the International Olympic Committee as
it contemplates a landscape in which cities are no longer queuing up in quite the same way
to host their showpiece event.
The other big question is whether Russian athletes will line up on the athletics track, after
being banned for an indefinite period over systemic state-sponsored doping. They almost
certainly will, given the wider politics at play, but the taint of the scandal will not go away.
In France, footballs European Championship expanded from 16 to 24 teams for the first
time was supposed to be a feelgood celebration but will now take place under a heavy
security blanket after the Paris attacks. Yet the signs are that fans are more likely to travel
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

7/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

and party in defiance than stay away in fear.


Meanwhile, the fallout at Fifa and the International Association of Athletics Federations
(IAAF) from 12 months of jaw-dropping developments will continue as criminal
investigations into deep-seated corruption progress.
The currently suspended Sepp Blatter will formally relinquish his hold over Fifa in
February but it remains to be seen if any of the unimpressive cast of potential replacements
offers the prospect of real reform, while the embattled IAAF president, Sebastian Coe, faces
the hardest race of his life in resurrecting his crisis-hit sport.
Owen Gibson

Cyprus
Its been dubbed a graveyard for peacemakers, the Rubiks Cube of diplomacy, but despite
the odds Cyprus may well defy naysayers in 2016 by solving its decades-long division. The
strategic Mediterranean island, home of Europes last partitioned capital, is facing what
seasoned Cyprus watchers are calling a historic window of opportunity.
In an unprecedented meeting of minds, Greek and Turkish Cypriots regard the year ahead
as the last best chance to end the ethnic divide. Greek Cypriots, emerging from their worst
economic crisis since an attempt at union with Athens prompted Ankara to invade in 1974,
have increasingly come round to seeing the benefits of reunification. They know that if
they dont do a deal now there is a very good chance that partition will be cemented and
Turkey will annex the north, says James Ker-Lindsay, a Cyprus expert at the London
School of Economics. That would mean not only bordering Turkey, but an unpredictable
and potentially disturbing Turkey.
For the minority Turkish Cypriots, the rationale is not dissimilar. A reunited Cyprus would,
they say, not only offer a better and brighter future in an EU member state but in a country
that, in sharp contrast to Turkey, is avowedly secular.
Reflecting the optimism, both communities are led by doughty pro-union moderates
Greek Nicos Anastasiades and his Turkish counterpart Mustafa Akinci who have made
reunification in a loose bi-zonal, bi-communal federation their central goal.
If you cant settle it with these two guys, youll never settle it, says Ker-Lindsay, who
puts the chances of success at six or higher on a scale of one to 10.
But it is the stance of Turkey itself that gives the biggest hope. A confluence of events
ranging from Ankaras recent run-in with Russia to the re-energising of its EU accession
process has put the need for a Cyprus settlement centre stage. A solution would afford
Turkey a badly needed foreign policy success, allow it to diversify its energy supplies with
the islands subsequent transformation into a regional transport hub for oil and gas
reserves and boost its chances of joining the EU. It would also free up Turkish funds: the
islands breakaway north is utterly dependent on Turkey bankrolling it.
For years, Ankara viewed Cyprus as strategic territory reconquered, notes Hubert
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

8/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

Faustmann, who teaches history and political science at the University of Nicosia. Now,
its a loss it seems willing to accept for higher benefit.
Both sides are engaged in intense negotiations with a view to holding referendums once an
agreement is clinched. But they have yet to discuss the issues of property, security and
territory, all potential deal breakers. Parliamentary elections in the south loom, another
spoiler if hardline rejectionists have their way. I am hopeful well have an agreement, but
getting a double yes in the referendums may be as difficult as reaching a deal, says
Faustmann. But the stars are aligned; we have a perfect storm for a solution to happen.
Helena Smith in Athens

UN secretary general
By the end of 2016, there will be a new UN secretary general and there is a better than even
chance it will be a woman, for the first time. Whether this will make any real difference to
the world is unclear. The job has been described as the worlds chief diplomat or even the
secular pope, though in reality it is more akin to the manager of a posh restaurant. You
get to rub shoulders with a lot of powerful people, but rarely on equal terms.
The incumbent, Ban Ki-moon, was chosen in 2006 in part because he appeared sufficiently
unthreatening to the worlds major powers. If the rules of the game remain unchanged,
with the permanent five members of the security council choosing his successor in secret
and presenting the result to the rest of the world as a fait accompli, we can expect a similar
outcome.
There is a growing drive, however, to change the rules and throw the contest open to the
light of public scrutiny. The 1 for 7 Billion campaign, backed by hundreds of NGOs, is
proposing an official shortlist of candidates who will have to publish broad manifestos and
subject themselves to questions. The security council would still present a shortlist, but it
would have to be a list of more than one. More than 170 million people around the world
have signalled their support. The idea is to produce someone who is less secretary and
more general, with a broad power base and an independent mandate, rather than to be
beholden to some murky backroom deal.
There are signs that the security council is beginning to take heed of the groundswell. In an
initiative pushed by the UK, a letter is to be sent to the 193 delegations in the general
assembly in the New Year inviting candidates and setting a timetable and format for the
election.
Until then, the campaign among aspiring secretary generals continues to be a discreet
affair, mostly played out in private by unannounced candidates behind closed doors in
midtown Manhattan. At this early stage, the conventional wisdom favours someone from
eastern Europe (a region yet to take a turn in providing a secretary general) and a woman
(all eight holders of the position thus far have been men).
There are a handful of names who fulfil both criteria, including two Bulgarians the Unesco
chief, Irina Bokova, and the EUs budget commissioner, Kristalina Georgieva as well as the
former Croatian foreign minister Vesna Pusi.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

9/10

12/31/2015

Whatwillhappenin2016?|Worldnews|TheGuardian

Also thought to be in the running are Helen Clark, the former New Zealand prime minister
who now runs the UN Development Programme, and Kevin Rudd, the former Australian
prime minister.
Not even the idealists in the 1 for 7 Billion campaign believe the permanent five are going
to give up the veto and throw the vote open completely. But the hope is that the major
powers hit deadlock over their own favourites and find themselves unable to resist a
genuinely popular choice thrown up by the general assembly. Whichever way it goes, it will
be a critical year in UN history.
Julian Borger in London
More features

Topics
Syria
Yemen
Greece
China
US elections 2016
More

Save for later Article saved


Reuse this content

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/whatwillhappenin2016predictions

10/10

You might also like