M-NCPPC Montgomery County Application Activity

The Montgomery County Planning Department is releasing this data to give interested parties insight
on the application trends for the last six months. The data in this report is automatically updated from
the Planning Department's database on the fifth day of each month and compares the last full three
month's activities to the previous three month's activities.

10/1/2009 1/1/2010 %
to to Change
12/31/2009 3/31/2010

Applications Submitted

Preliminary Plans 11 21 91%

New Applications 7 11
Amendments 4 8
Extensions 0 2

Site Plans 11 22 100%

New Applications 2 3
Amendments 9 19

Project Plans 3 2 -33%

New Applications 2 1
Amendments 1 1

Preapplication Plans 1 3 200%

Staff Review Only 1 3
Staff & PB Review 0 0

Record Plats 31 26 -16%

Subdivision Review Waivers 0 1 N/A

Building Permits requiring 195 288 48%

MNCPPC Review
Local Map Amendments 0 1 N/A

Development Plan Amendments 0 4 N/A

Special Exceptions 8 8 0%

Zoning Text Amendments 0 0 N/A

Mandatory Referrals 4 16 300%

Page 1 of 5 Data from Hansen, a component of IDEAL - Information for DEvelopment And Land Use 04/05/2010
 10/1/2009 1/1/2010 %
to to Change
12/31/2009 3/31/2010

Natural Resource Inventory/ 32 32 0%

Forest Stand Delineations
New Applications 26 30
Recertifications 6 2

Forest Conservation Exemptions 33 30 -9%

New Applications 33 29
Recertifications 0 1

Special Protection Area Plans 3 1 -67%

Forest Conservation Plans 8 7 -13%

Preliminary Plans
Site Plans
Project Plans
Preapplication Plans
Subdivision Review Waivers
Local Map Amendments
Development Plan Amendments
Special Exceptions
Mandatory Referrals
Park FCP Plans
Sediment Control FCP Plans
1 4
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
1 0
1 2
0 0
3 1

Fees Collected
Preliminary Plans 173,836 192,987 11%
Site Plans 169,510 102,511 -40%
Project Plans 86,721 75,902 -12%
Preapplication Plans 3,000 9,000 200%
Record Plats 68,200 57,200 -16%
Subdivision Review Waivers 0 2,390 0%
Forest Conservation Exemptions 4,140 3,600 -13%
Special Protection Area Plans 380 750 97%
Forest Conservation Plans 23,503 12,617 -46%
Others 74,684 39,179 -48%

Page 2 of 5 Data from Hansen, a component of IDEAL - Information for DEvelopment And Land Use 04/05/2010
 10/1/2009 1/1/2010 %
to to Change
12/31/2009 3/31/2010

Applications receiving a Decision

Preliminary Plans 16 16 0%
New Applications 15 13
Amendments 1 3
Extensions 0 0

Site Plans 16 8 -50%

New Applications 3 1
Amendments 13 7

Project Plans 2 0 -100%

New Applications 1 0
Amendments 1 0

Preapplication Plans 0 2 N/A

Staff Review Only 0 1
Staff and PB Review 0 1

Record Plats 37 22 -41%

Subdivision Review Waivers 0 0 N/A
Local Map Amendments 2 0 -100%
Development Plan Amendments 0 0 N/A
Special Exceptions 0 0 N/A
Mandatory Referrals 0 0 N/A
Natural Resources Inventory/ 21 28 33%
Forest Stand Delineations
New Applications 16 26
Recertifications 5 2

Forest Conservation Exemptions 39 21 -46%

New Applications 39 21
Recertifications 0 0

Forest Conservation Plans 14 11 -21%

Preliminary Plans
Site Plans
Project Plans
Preapplication Plans
Subdivision Review Waivers
Local Map Amendments
Development Plan Amendments
Special Exceptions
Mandatory Referrals
Park FCP Plans
Sediment Control FCP Plans
12 10
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

Page 3 of 5 Data from Hansen, a component of IDEAL - Information for DEvelopment And Land Use 04/05/2010
 10/1/2009 1/1/2010 %
to to Change
12/31/2009 3/31/2010

Reviews Completed (Average Days)

Preliminary Plan (# of plans) 17 16 -6%
Review Days 84 254 201 %
Delay Days due to Internal Discussion 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Applicant 21.7 5.9 -73 %
Delay Days Due to Other Agencies 8.5 0 -100 %
Delay Days Due to County Regulations 1.9 0 -100 %
Delay Days Due to Citizen's concerns 0 0 0%
No. of Plans Required FCP Review 1 1 0%
FCP Review Days 5 196 3,761 %

Site Plan (# of plans) 15 8 -47%

Review Days 54 39 -29 %
Delay Days due to Internal Discussion 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Applicant 5.4 0 -100 %
Delay Days Due to Other Agencies 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to County Regulations 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Citizen's 0 0 0%
concerns 1 0 -100%
No. of Plans Required FCP Review
FCP Review Days 0 0 0%

Preapplication (# of plans) 0 1 NA
Review Days 0 224 NA
Delay Days due to Internal Discussion .0 73.0 NA
Delay Days Due to Applicant .0 .0 0%

Delay Days Due to Other Agencies 0.0 .0 0%

Delay Days Due to County Regulations 0.0 .0 0%
Delay Days Due to Citizen's concerns .0 .0 0%

NRI/FSD (# of plans) 21 26 24%

Review Days 14 18 24 %
Delay Days due to Internal Discussion 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Applicant 0 .5 NA
Delay Days Due to Other Agencies 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to County Regulations 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Citizen's concerns 0 0 0%

Page 4 of 5 Data from Hansen, a component of IDEAL - Information for DEvelopment And Land Use 04/05/2010
 10/1/2009 1/1/2010 %
to to Change
12/31/2009 3/31/2010

FCP Exemption (# of plans) 35 16 -54%

Review Days 10 25 155 %
Delay Days due to Internal Discussion 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Applicant 0.9 0 -100 %
Delay Days Due to Other Agencies 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to County Regulations 0 0 0%
Delay Days Due to Citizen's concerns 0 0 0%

Resolution Processing

Preliminary Plans to Legal 11 14 27%

Average days to get to Legal 29 71 142%
Average days in Legal 55 16 -70%

Site Plans to Legal 8 2 -75%

Average days to get to Legal 5 0 -100%
Average days in Legal 81 107 33%

Project Plans to Legal 1 0 -100%

Average days to get to Legal 4 0 -100%
Average days in Legal 133 0 -100%

Preapplication Plan to Legal 0 0 N/A

Average days to get to Legal 0 0 N/A
Average days in Legal 0 0 N/A

Page 5 of 5 Data from Hansen, a component of IDEAL - Information for DEvelopment And Land Use 04/05/2010