Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1617/s11527-015-0630-6
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
1 Introduction
Since the development of ordinary Portland cement
(OPC) has been over 175 years, it has become the
dominant binder used in concrete for construction. The
annual global cement production has reached 2.8 billion tonnes nowadays, and is expected to increase to
4 billion tonnes. [23]. However, the OPC production
has a large environmental impact [3]. It contributes
approximately 58 % of global CO2 emissions [20, 30,
31, 35] and is always among the largest emissions
sources [4]. In addition, the process always involves
the destruction of natural quarries and energy consumption to extract raw materials. It is reported that the
manufacturing of OPC consumes 27803050 TWh of
energy annually, approximately 23 % of global
primary energy use [18]. Hence, there is a great need
for alternative green binders in construction to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and save energy and natural
resources. For this purpose, blended cements, in which
a portion of OPC is replaced by industrial waste
materials with pozzolanic properties, such as fly ash
from coal combustion or slag from iron production, are
used as binders for concrete. The pozzolanic properties
of fly ash, slag and metakaolin are due to the presence
of large quantities of reactive SiO2 and Al2O3. They
react with the Ca(OH)2, liberated during the hydration
of OPC to form calcium silicate hydrates (CSH) and
calcium aluminate silicate hydrates (CASH) phases, and give strength for blended cement materials [13,
32]. However, because the OPC is typically replaced
2 Research significance
This study involves an innovative cementitious SCA
binder simply made of two industrial wastes, ground
granulated blast furnace slag (S) and circulating
fluidized bed combustion fly ash (CA) without OPC
to manufacture various mixtures of pastes and mortars.
Experimental results clearly show that the SCA binder
is appropriate for practical construction with adequate
strengths and resistance to shrinkage. Therefore, it is
likely to replace some of the OPC. In addition, this
study examines the microstructure of the SCA binder
and proposes mechanisms associated with the properties investigated. The outcome of this study are useful
for further researches on this promising SCA ecobinder in the future. Furthermore, the use of S and CA
by-products to produce S eco-binder plays a pivotal
role to reduce environmental impacts, save natural
resources and create green materials.
CA
2.83
2.47
6000
3000
Physical properties
Specific gravity
Blaine fineness (cm2/g)
Chemical compositions (%)
Loss of ignition
4.72
SiO2
34.9
5.22
Al2O3
13.53
2.21
CaO
41.47
56.80
MgO
7.18
2.06
SO3
1.74
32.40
0.65
Fe2O3
0.52
0.581
(b)
2.65
Fineness modulus
2.64
1.65
(c)
(d)
Binders
W/
B
CA (kg/
m3)
Slag (kg/
m3)
Water (kg/
m3)
SP (kg/
m3)
Final
setting
P15 W/B0.35
15 %CA ? 85 %
slag
0.35
209
1183
485
2.51
6.2
11.6
P20 W/B0.35
20 %CA ? 80 %
slag
25 % CA ? 75 %
slag
0.35
277
1110
483
2.50
6.3
11.6
0.35
346
1037
481
2.49
6.9
12.6
P25 W/B0.35
P0 W/B0.40
100 % slag
0.40
0.00
1314
524
1.05
34.3
54.3
P15 W/B0.40
15 % CA ? 85 %
slag
0.40
195
1106
519
1.04
6.3
12.6
P20 W/B0.40
20 % CA ? 80 %
slag
0.40
259
1037
517
1.04
6.0
13.8
P25 W/B0.40
25 % CA ? 75 %
slag
0.40
323
969
516
1.03
5.9
13.6
P100 W/
B0.40
100 % CA
0.40
1230
0.00
490
1.72
(e)
Fine aggregate
(kg/m3)
SP (kg/m3)
Water
(kg/m3)
99
562
1325
0.20
231
55
87
502
1458
0.59
206
60
78
442
1590
1.04
181
20
50
132
527
1325
0.20
230
0.35
20
55
118
471
1458
0.88
205
0.35
0.35
20
25
60
50
104
164
415
492
1590
1325
1.30
0.20
180
229
W/B0.35CA25S55
0.35
25
55
147
440
1458
0.59
205
W/B0.35CA25S60
0.35
25
60
129
387
1590
1.03
180
W/B0.40CA15S50
0.40
15
50
93
525
1325
0.19
247
W/B0.40CA15S55
0.40
15
55
83
469
1458
0.55
220
W/B0.40CA15S60
0.40
15
60
73
413
1590
0.97
193
W/B0.40CA20S50
0.40
20
50
123
492
1325
0.18
246
W/B0.40CA20S55
0.40
20
55
110
440
1458
0.82
219
W/B0.40CA20S60
0.40
20
60
97
388
1590
1.21
193
W/B0.40CA25S50
0.40
25
50
153
460
1325
0.18
245
W/B0.40CA25S55
0.40
25
55
137
411
1458
0.82
218
W/B0.40CA25S60
0.40
25
60
121
362
1590
0.97
192
Mixture
W/B
CA/
(CA ? slag) (%)
Volume
of fine
aggregate
(%)
W/B0.35CA15S50
0.35
15
50
W/B0.35CA15S55
0.35
15
W/B0.35CA15S60
0.35
15
W/B0.35CA20S50
0.35
W/B0.35CA20S55
W/B0.35CA20S60
W/B0.35CA25S50
CA (kg/m3)
Fig. 3 Compressive
strength of SCA pastes with
W/B of 0.4
100
P15W/B0.35
P20W/B0.35
P25W/B0.35
P15W/B0.40
P20W/B0.40
P25W/B0.40
50
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
0
20
40
60
80
Time of exposure (days)
100
P15W/B0.35
P20W/B0.35
P25W/B0.35
600
P15W/B0.40
P20W/B0.40
P25W/B0.40
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
Time of exposure (days)
100
The hydration products of SCA binder were investigated by SEM/EDX and XRD, and the results are
shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. The SEM results
show that the SCA paste generates several hydrated
phases bonded together and thus the SCA paste has
Location
Elements
Si/Ca
Al/Ca
Ca (%)
Si (%)
Al (%)
O (%)
1 (Fig. 5c)
33.06
19.12
7.20
40.62
0.57
0.22
2 (Fig. 5c)
31.12
19.37
7.64
41.87
0.62
0.25
3 (Fig. 5d)
4 (Fig. 5d)
27.16
25.45
14.65
16.83
11.26
6.55
46.93
51.17
0.54
0.66
0.41
0.26
5 (Fig. 5e)
36.09
17.32
6.04
40.56
0.48
0.17
25
0
-25
-50
-75
W/B0.35CA20S50
W/B0.35CA20S55
W/B0.35CA20S60
-100
-125
0
20
40
60
80
Time of exposure (days)
(a) Air curing
100
20
40
60
80
Time of exposure (days)
(b) Water curing
100
W/B0.40CA25S50
W/B0.40CA25S55
W/B0.40CA25S60
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
0
W/B0.40CA20S50
W/B0.40CA20S55
W/B0.40CA20S60
5 Conclusions
An innovative slag eco-binder (SCA) without OPC
was created in this study by using CFBC fly ash (CA)
to activate the hydration of GGBF slag (S). The
engineering properties and microstructure of the SCA
paste and mortar were investigated. Through the
experimental results, the following conclusions can be
drawn:
1.
2.
3.
Fig. 10 SEM micrographs of SCA mortars cured in air at
91 days
fine aggregate restrains the drying shrinkage of SCAwater system so that the drying shrinkage of SCA
mortars was less than that of the SCA pastes.
4.
References
1. ASTM (2007) Standard test methods for time of setting of
hydraulic cement by vicat needle. ASTM Committee C01,
West Conshohocken
2. ASTM (2008) Standard test method for measuring the
drying shrinkage of masonry mortar. ASTM Committee
C12, West Conshohocken
3. Barcelo L, Kline J, Walenta G, Gartner E (2014) Cement
and carbon emissions. Mater Struct 47:10551065
4. Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, Bahadori A (2013)
Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in
cement industry. J Clean Prod 51:142161. doi:10.1016/j.
jclepro.2012.10.049
5. Buchwald A, Tatarin R, Stephan D (2009) Reaction progress of alkaline-activated metakaolin-ground granulated
blast furnace slag blends. J Mater Sci 44:56095617. doi:10.
1007/s10853-009-3790-3
6. C-1 AC (1999) Standard test method for compressive
strength of hydraulic cement mortars [using 2-in. or (50mm) cube specimens]. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
7. Camarini G, De Milito JA (2011) Gypsum hemihydrate
cement blends to improve renderings durability. Constr
Build Mater 25:41214125. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.
2011.04.048
8. Dongxu L, Xuequan W, Jinlin S, Yujiang W (2000) The
influence of compound admixtures on the properties of
high-content slag cement. Cem Concr Res 30:4550. doi:10.
1016/S0008-8846(99)00210-0
9. Ghafoori N, Mora CAG (1998) Compacted non-cement
concrete utilizing fluidized bed and pulverized coal combustion by-products. ACI Mater J 95:582592
10. Glinicki M, Zielinski M (2008) Air void system in concrete
containing circulating fluidized bed combustion fly ash.
Mater Struct 41:681687. doi:10.1617/s11527-007-9273-6
11. Glinicki M, Zielinski M (2009) Frost salt scaling resistance
of concrete containing CFBC fly ash. Mater Struct
42:9931002. doi:10.1617/s11527-008-9438-y
12. Guneyisi E, Gesoglu M (2008) A study on durability
properties of high-performance concretes incorporating
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.