Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
Course
Tutor
Date
also incorporates external stakeholders to organizations such as suppliers and trade partners.
Organizations are required to promote economic and social well-being of local communities.
Globalization is one of the issues that have led to the emergence of the topic operations and
CSR. Globalization refers to increased level of interdependence of countries in relation to crossborder transactions (Oh and Park 2015, p. 85). In addition, capital flows from one region to
another is on the rise. As a result, business operations have major impacts to the world.
Globalization of trade is considered the principal cause if exploitation and corruption in several
countries. However, globalization is also viewed as a process of spreading prosperity to other
parts of the world. CSR in relation to globalization aims at reconciling globalization trend and
impact to societies. Currently, there is a shared responsibility for all organizations and their
operations to be appropriate to global challenges. Responsibility to humanity and environment
does not stop when a company crosses the border into another country (Bice 2014, p. 160).
Equality in dignity, gender and respect for women and men, as well as the need to respect shared
values and norms form parts of CSR initiatives in international business operations.
Economic dimensions of CSR have also been presented by scholars. Organizations have realized
the need to make decisions that have no economic consequences. Decisions in the short-term
may prove to have negative economic consequences. However, long-term vitality of such
solutions may lead to economic benefits (Cadbury 2006, p. 4). For instance, investment into CSR
mat lead to ROI in the long-term but not in the short-term. In stock markets, environmental,
social, and governance issues determine the value of shares of certain organizations.
Organizations viewed to be unethical to the society and the environments have received negative
stock valuations (Brammer et al. 2007, p. 170). The idea of socially responsible investment has
emerged as a critical component of CSR and business operations in the international market.
Part 2: Operations Management of ASDA
ASDA is one of the biggest retailers in the United Kingdom, with operations across the United
Kingdom. Tesco provides services to millions of customers each day. One of the most critical
aspects of ASDA as a retailer involves online grocery shopping and delivery to customers
(Doherty 2006, p. 5). The company aims at creating value to the customer through products in
retail stores as well as efficient delivery of products and services. Competition in the retail
industry is based on the need to provide services base on modern online shopping technologies
(Christopher and Peck 2004, p. 7). ASDAs operations management are viewed in terms of
product delivery and supply chain management.
Operations Transformation Process of ASDA
ASDA experiences stiff competition from other retailers such as Tesco, Morrisons, and
Sainsbury. As a result, retail companies have identified the need to develop operations that can
compete in the market based on the ever changing needs of the customer. ASDA responds to
competition and complexity in the market through and effective operations strategy (Doherty
2006, p. 8). The operations strategy of ASDA can be analysed in certain aspects such as
corporate strategy, business unit strategy, and functional strategy. Corporate strategy of ASDA
involves establishment of several supermarkets across major cities and towns in the United
Kingdom (Leat and Revoredo-Giha 2013). Several stores established across the United Kingdom
ensure that ASDA increased customer flow to the corporate strategy so that sales and profits are
guaranteed.
Competition and saturation of the domestic market is a major challenge. ASDA is committed to
innovation such as online shopping and delivery of products to customers as competitive strategy
(Leat and Revoredo-Giha 2013). ASDA expansion into all part of the United Kingdom can be
related to its commitment to the success of corporate strategy. ASDA majorly focuses on the UK
market without expansion into overseas markets. One of the major disadvantages of ASDAs
corporate strategy involves the inability to compete in the international markets with other
retailers such as Tesco.
ASDA has a business unit strategy and functional strategy that achieves success in terms of
operations management. In particular, ASDA is committed to quality services to the customer so
that they can break into other markets in the United Kingdom. In terms of competition, ASDA is
among major competitors in the UK. A critical component of operations strategy is to design
services and products that benefit the customer. In particular, ASDA introduced the strong
customer focus concept whereby low prices, as well as ASDA card loyalty holders are rewarded
with points (Christopher and Peck 2004). A major competitive strategy involves the use of prices
whereby customers are allowed by ASDA to engage in bulk buying so that discounts can be
given to loyal customers (Leat and Revoredo-Giha 2013, p. 34). The online delivery system and
online shopping platform also ensures that customers achieve efficiency in terms of product
delivery. In terms of low-cost operations, ASDA created UK product sourcing tem so that they
pick food and non-food products across the United Kingdom. As a result, ASDA ensures that
cost-cutting is achieved in relation to food and non-food products as well as expansion into other
business models such as e-commerce.
According to Xie and Allen (2013, p. 6), ASDA also ensures that the delivery system and an
innovative supply chain form part of operations in the United Kingdom so that quality customer
service can be achieved. ASDAs delivery system is based on online ordering and home delivery
services. The distribution process is efficient so that product delivery meet consumer needs.
Investment into online food shopping enables ASDA to reduce time taken to serve the customer.
However, service costs have increased because of home delivery services provided by the
company. Online food sales at ASDA have reached over 200 million pounds. The home shopping
system developed by ASDA ensures that there are high levels of revenues and improved
customer loyalty to the better customer service.
Trade-off analysis of operations performance objectives
Efficiency of operations is a major concern for ASDA. In the process of increasing the efficiency
of service delivery and save costs, ASDA developed a distribution system whereby the
companys own fleet, transports products to domestic customers. The distribution system also
ensures that goods from suppliers reach the retailer at the shortest time possible. Efficiency in
service delivery and distribution of products is achieved through the use of ASDAs trucks
(Annarelli and Nonino 2015, p 12). However, there is still need for improvement so that the
distribution systems compete with Tesco as the largest retailer in the United Kingdom. In some
cases, ASDA may not have sufficient fleet to deliver and puck up goods from suppliers. In some
regions of the UK, ASDA has few trucks thereby leading to dependence on suppliers.
Cost reduction at ASDA is achieved through lean management as part of operations
management. ASDA ensures that new technologies are introduced to integrate lean management
into the business strategy. Investments in technologies such as RFID ensure that product tracking
information through the supply chains is achieved through bar codes (Leat and Revoredo-Giha
2013, p. 14). As a result, cost saving is achieved when technologies are used to reduce the levels
of employee performing manual duties. The automation of processes within the supermarket and
supply chain is a major costs cutting initiative.
In terms of dependability and flexibility, ASDA has introduced the online shopping system.
Home shopping through e-commerce platform developed by the company ensures that customers
depend on ASDA to provide efficient and quality services in terms of product delivery (Tidy et
al. 2015, p. 9). Flexibility is achieved through home delivery systems achieved through ASDAs
trucks. The online food shopping system, as well as the home delivery service work together to
achieve dependability and flexibility.
ASDAs Corporate Social Responsibility
ASDAs sustainability approach relates to respect to the environment. Reduction of food waste in
ASDAs stores and supply chain is part of CSR initiatives. Green operations concept of CSR is
applied at ASDAs. In particular, ASDA ensures that they support nature and community
projects. In terms of nature, ASDA supports tree planting across the United Kingdom and
countries such as Costa Rica (Asda.com 2015). Projects such as Nature and community ensure
that ASDA works together with stakeholders to protect and preserve biodiversity in Costa Rica
and the United Kingdom. Green operations also ensure that ASDA tackles food waste. An
innovative way of reducing food waste involves donating to charity or reducing the level of stock
at distribution centres across the United Kingdom.
Energy efficiency is another aspect of ASDAs CSR. In each year, ASDA invests over 10 million
pounds in improving the energy use so that carbon emissions can be reduced. ASDA is
committed to reduce effects of global warming and climate change as current sustainability
issues surrounding CSR. ASDA reports that since 2005, the company has managed to reduce
energy usage by 33% in existing and new stores (Asda.com 2015). Reduced energy is aimed at
reducing overreliance on fossil fuels as well as energy conservation for the benefit of the wider
United Kingdom. In addition, reduced energy ensures that ASDA reduces costs associated with
energy.
References
Asda.com, 2015. Sustainability. Available at: http://your.asda.com/sustainability [Accessed
December 3, 2015].
Amao, O., 2008. MANDATING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: EMERGING
TRENDS IN NIGERIA. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 6(1), pp.75
95.
Annarelli, A. and Nonino, F., 2015. Strategic and operational management of organizational
resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega.
Bice, S., 2014. Bridging corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment. Impact
Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(2), pp.160166.
Brammer, S., Millington, A., and Rayton, B., 2007. The contribution of corporate social
responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 18(10), pp.17011719..
Cadbury, A., 2006. Corporate social responsibility. Twenty-First Century Society, 1(1), pp.521.
Chaves, R. et al., 2011. E-corporate social responsibility in socially responsible firms: the case of
Spanish firms. The Service Industries Journal, 31(12), pp.20332050.
Christopher, M., and Peck, H., 2004. Building the resilient supply chain. journal of logistics
management. Available at:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09574090410700275 [Accessed December
3, 2015].
Doherty, N., 2006. The UK grocery business: towards a sustainable model for virtual markets.
Management. Available at:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09590550610660279 [Accessed December
3, 2015].
Dunne, S., 2008. Corporate social responsibility and the value of corporate moral pragmatism.
Culture and Organization, 14(2), pp.135149.
Foote, J., Gaffney, N., and Evans, J.R., 2010. Corporate social responsibility: Implications for
performance excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(8), pp.799
812.
Kanji, G.K, and Chopra, P.K., 2010. Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Total
Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(2), pp.119143.
Leat, P., and Revoredo-Giha, C., 2013. Risk and resilience in agri-food supply chains: the case of
the ASDA PorkLink supply chain in Scotland. Supply Chain Management: Analysis, 13(3),
pp. 34-40.
Manente, M., Minghetti, V., and Mingotto, E., 2012. Ranking assessment systems for responsible
tourism products and corporate social responsibility practices. Anatolia, 23(1), pp.7589.
Ndhlovu, T.P., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Investment: The
South African Case. Journal of African Business, 12(1), pp.7292.
Oh, W., and Park, S., 2015. The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and
Corporate Financial Performance in Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,
51(sup3), pp.8594.
Rosser, A., and Edwin, D., 2010. The politics of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. The
Pacific Review, 23(1), pp.122.
Stankeviien, J., and epulyt, J., 2014. Sustainable value creation: coherence of corporate
social responsibility and performance of socially responsible investment funds. Economic
Research-Ekonomska Istraivanja, 27(1), pp.882898.
Stone, K.B., 2012. Lean Transformation: Organizational Performance Factors that Influence
Firms Leanness. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(4), pp.229249.
Tan, W., 2011. Managing Lean Projects: Understanding the Structures of Lean Production.
International Journal of Construction Management, 11(3), pp.6778.
Tidy, M., Wang, X., and Hall, M., 2015. The role of Supplier Relationship Management in
reducing Greenhouse Gas emissions from food supply chains: supplier engagement in the
UK supermarket sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. Available at:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261501536X [Accessed
December 3, 2015].
Xie, Y.,and Allen, C., 2013. Information technologies in retail supply chains: a comparison of
Tesco and Asda. of Business Performance and Supply Chain . Available at:
http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2013.051648 [Accessed
December 3, 2015].