Professional Documents
Culture Documents
natural sciences?
Doctoral Seminar on Research Methodology | Topic 3/26
ETH Zurich | University of St. Gallen | Fall Semester 2013
Jan Ossenbrink (ETH, MTEC)
Annegret Stephan (ETH, MTEC)
| 10/25/2013 |
Agenda
1.
Introduction
2.
Natural Sciences
3.
Social Sciences
4.
Comparison
5.
Implications
Jan Ossenbrink
| 10/25/2013 |
Annegret Stephan
1. Introduction
Different branches of science
Natural
Physical
Chemical
Biological
Social
Economics
Sociology
Creational
Engineering
Technological
Formal
Mathematics
Logic
Humanities
Economics
Sociology
Jan Ossenbrink
| 10/25/2013 |
Annegret Stephan
2. Natural Sciences
Definition
Natural Sciences
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
L. da Vinci
N. Copernicus
G. Galilei
I. Newton
1452 - 1519
1473 - 1543
1564 - 1642
1642 - 1712
Goal
Limitation
Generalizability of results
Infallibility vs. law of big N
Jan Ossenbrink
| 10/25/2013 |
Annegret Stephan
3. Social Sciences
Definition
Economics
Sociology
Politics
A. Comte
K. Marx
. Durkheim
M. Weber
1798 - 1857
1818 - 1883
1858 - 1917
1884 - 1920
Goal
Limitations
Jan Ossenbrink
| 10/25/2013 |
Annegret Stephan
4. Comparison
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Ontological
approach
Epistemological
approach
Analytic
Complex system single elements
Synthetic
Individuals complex system
Object of study
Nature
Social actors
Scientific
outcome
Predictive Power
High
Low
Methodological
Approaches
Jan Ossenbrink
| 10/25/2013 |
Annegret Stephan
5. Implications
Situation
Implication
Graduate Studies
PhD Studies
Jan Ossenbrink
| 10/25/2013 |
Annegret Stephan
References
Babbie, E., 2010. The Practice of Social Research 12th ed., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bayer, O., Stlting, E. & Seiffert, H., 1992. Sozialwissenschaften. In H. Seiffert & G. Radnitzky, eds. Handlexikon der
Wissenschaftstheorie. Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag, pp. 302313.
Bchel, W., 1992. Naturwissenschaften. In H. Seiffert & G. Radnitzky, eds. Handlexikon der Wissenschaftstheorie.
Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag, pp. 222231.
Creswell, J., 2009. Research Design - Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches 3rd ed. V. Knight & S.
Connelly, eds., Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hansson, S.O., 2008. Science and Pseudo-Science. In E. N. Zalta, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/.
Von Hayek, F.A., 1979. The Individualist and Compositive Method of the Social Sciences. In The Counter-Revolution
of Science Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc., pp. 6176.
Kuhn, T.S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press.
Ledoux, S.F., 2002. Defining Natural Sciences. Behaviorology Today, 5(1), pp.3436.
Mitcham, C. & Schatzberg, E., 2009. Defining Technology and the Engineering Sciences. In A. Meijers, ed. Philosophy
of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Elsevier B.V., pp. 2763. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44451667-1.50006-9.
Pelmter, A., 2008. Experimentierfeld des Seinknnens, Dichtung als Versuchssttte: zur Rolle des Experiments im
Werk Robert Musils, Knigshausen & Neumann.
Van de Ven, A.H., 2007. Engaged Scholarship, New York: Oxford University Press.
Weyl, H., 1949. Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science Reprint 20. F. Wilzczek, ed., Princeton University
Press.
Yogeshwar, R. et al., 2013. Quarks und Co - Auf Teilchenjagd, Germany, Switzerland: WDR Fernsehen. Available at:
http://www.wdr.de/tv/quarks/.
Jan Ossenbrink
| 25.10.2013 |
Annegret Stephan