Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Vereinigung der Freunde Antiker Kunst is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Antike Kunst.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 83.137.211.198 on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:55:20 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
DONALD
M. BAILEY
3R.PayneKnight,
MS Catalogue
ofBronzes,
folio136,XLVI,13.
4E. Hawkins,
MS Catalogue
oftheBronzes
intheBritish
Museum
ii,
folio321.
5Walters
op.c.(supranote1) 213.
6K.Schefold
andF.Jung,
Die Urkonige,
HerPerseus,
Bellerophon,
akles und Theseusin der klassischen
und hellenistischen
Kunst
(1988)207fig.267.
107
This content downloaded from 83.137.211.198 on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:55:20 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
points to kingship,and the pose and modellingto Hellenistic times; the bronze may itself be Hellenistic, but
equally may have been made during the Roman period,
perhaps in the firstcenturya.d. In the lattercase, did the
maker knowinglycopy a portrait-statueof a Hellenistic
king (and for what purpose?) or did he regard it merely
as a figure of Herakles? There is no way of knowing.
Analysis of the bronze by Susan La Niece of the British
Museum Research Laboratory shows that it is a bronze
and not a brass, and is thus not certainlyRoman, but
could be Hellenistic, as high-lead bronze (there is more
than 15% lead in the alloy) 'came into use, particularly
for largishcastingslike this figure,in the late Hellenistic
period and continued into the Roman period. There is
nothing about the metal composition which would
exclude eithera Ptolemaic or a Roman origin'13.
If this is indeed a portrait,is it possible to make any sort
of identification?Amongst the published royal portraits
of the Hellenistic period collected by Gisela Richter14
those of the early Ptolemies stand out as probabilities,
and Ptolemy III Euergetes does so in particular.Unfortunately,recognisingPtolemies is not a precise art, and
no named portraitsof the early Ptolemies survive.Coins
are most useful, and very fine portraitsare found on
these, but they are not always consistentin their likenesses, and some are posthumousissues, where the accuracy of the physiognomymay not be absolutelycertain.
7e.g.,ibid.156fig.193;192fig.233.
The most importantwork on Ptolemaic portraitsis that
8 ibid.188fig.230.
of Helmut Kyrieleis,who has gathered togethera great
9Roscher,
ML 1,1 (1884-90)21835.^.
Herakles
4c!(A.Furtwangler).
many certain,probable and possible representationsof
In classicalGreekarthisconnection
is mainly
withthecornucopia
It
these rulersof Egypton coins, gems and in sculpture15.
whohas
todo withanepisodewithPalaimon/Melikertes,
secondary,
Ptolemies
the
that
of
work
from
seem
would
Art
of
Classical
R.Vollkommer,
Heraklesin the
suchan attribute:
Kyrieleis'
Greece(1988)43-45.
where identificationhas been made, neither Ptolemy
10O. Palagia,LIMC 4 (1988)756-58nos 555-579;andsee also 837
Soter or PtolemyPhiladelphos are likelyfor our bronze,
no.1695.
but that it is a good candidate for PtolemyEuergetes or
11A young,garlanded
in his
Herculesholdsouta smallcornucopia
LIMC 4
lefthandin a lostPompeianwall-painting:
J.Boardman,
unlikethatofourbronze,
(1988)837no.1694;theposeis otherwise
Severus
toa Herakles
ona coinofSeptimius
butis somewhat
similar
fromMaioniainLydia:SNG 27,Lydia(1947)pi-7, 237.
13BritishMuseumResearchLaboratory
12A beardedHerakles
toourfigure,
intheLouvrehasa posesimilar
Reportby S. La Niece,
28
November
of
no.
he
was
in his extended
buthe has nothing
1989.
5906/33836S
righthand,although
14G.M.A.Richter,
The Portraits
oftheGreeks3 (1965).
meantto holda cup:Palagia,LIMC 4 (1988)769no.841.
probably
15H. Kyrieleis,
ForschunBildnisse
derPtolemaer
in a sale
(= Archaologische
Comparealso a bronzeHerculessaidto be fromBritain,
no.
86.
Mortals
M.
Gods
and
gen2, 1975).
(1989)
J. Eisenberg,
catalogue:
bow is an attributeof Herakles, but such a large piece of
equipmentis not possible in our bronze. Again, a sword
is not normallythoughtof as being associated with Herakles, but he is shown using one in Athenianred-figure
vase painting7,and, indeed, is shown on a stamnoswitha
scabbarded sword dependingfroma baldrick8.A horn of
plentyseems at firstsight unlikelyfor a being with the
characterof Herakles, but he is certainlyshown withit in
Hellenistic and Roman art,if not veryoften9.Depictions
in the round or in reliefnormallyrepresenthim holding
the cornucopia in the crook of the left arm10,the standard position for such an attributewhen held by other
deities or personifications(Fortuna, Eros, Harpokrates,
etc.): no otherexamples have been tracedwhere it is held
out in his righthand11,a pose Herakles usually keeps for
his drinking-cup12.
The cornucopia was thoughtto be the
horn of the river-godAcheloos, wrenched off by Herakles duringtheirfight,and thus an appropriateattribute
(another version of the origin of the cornucopia is less
relevantto Herakles: that it was the horn of the goat
Amaltheia,who suckled the child Zeus). But the face of
our figure, although on a small scale and summarily
treated,has the appearance of a portrait,idealised perhaps, but not the idealisation of a hero. The diadem
108
This content downloaded from 83.137.211.198 on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:55:20 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
16H.A. Troxell,
The American
Numismatic
MuseumNotes
Society,
28, 1983,65.
17A.BoeckhandJ.Franz,CorpusInscriptionum
Graecarum
3 (1853)
no.5127; W.Dittenberger,
OrientisGraeciInscriptiones
Selectae
(1903)no.54.
18Vollkommer
op.c. (supranote9) 88-90.
19Boreas9, 1986,137-51.
20ibid.143f.
21EA 38442:Kyrieleis
op.c.(supranote15)pl.9.
22A. Ippel,Der Bronzefund
vonGaljub(1922)pl.7, 73.
23M.Bieber,The Sculpture
of theHellenistic
Age (1955) 91 and
34ifig24Kyrieleis
op.c.(supranote15) 38.
109
This content downloaded from 83.137.211.198 on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:55:20 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LIST OF PLATES
PI.21
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG*
H. 29,9cm.London,British
Bronzestatuette.
Museum
GR 1824.4-46.1
British
Museum.
3. Phot.Copyright
I 10
This content downloaded from 83.137.211.198 on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:55:20 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
21
This content downloaded from 83.137.211.198 on Fri, 11 Dec 2015 20:55:20 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions