AN

PROGRAMS/PROJECT

PHYSICAL OUTPUT

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

2014 ACCOMPLISHENT

QUARTER

2015 ANNUAL TARGET

JUN

TEACHING
AND
LEARNING
PROCESS

DAILY LESSON PLAN AND

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

NO. OF PREPARED DAILY LESSON

PLANS AND DAILY LOGS OF
ACTIVITIES INCLUDING
APPROPRIATE, ADEQUATE AND
UPDATED INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS WITHIN THE RATING
PERIOD.

100%

180

20

CLASS RULES AND WELL

BEHAVED STUDENTS

INITIATED DISCIPLINE OF
STUDENTS INCLUDING
CLASSROOM RULES , GUIDELINES
,INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP TASK
WITHIN RATING PERIOD

100%

95% of learners

100%

100%

100% of students'
attendance
monitored

MONITORED ATTENDANCE,
DIVERSITY,SAFE, POSITIVE AND
POSITIVE/
PRODUCTIVE/
MOTIVATING ENVIRONMENT,
SAFE LEARNING
CLEANLINESS AND ORDERLINESS

ENVIRONMENT

MONITORED ATTENDANCE,
DIVERSITY,SAFE, POSITIVE AND
POSITIVE/
PRODUCTIVE/
MOTIVATING ENVIRONMENT,
SAFE LEARNING
CLEANLINESS AND ORDERLINESS
ENVIRONMENT
OF CLASSROOMS INCLUDING
PROPER WASTE DISPOSAL.

STUDENTS
OUTCOMES

100%

100% of students'
attendance
monitored

COMPLETE AND ACCURATE

CLASS RECORD

MONITORED AND EVALUATED

STUDENTS PROGRESS WITH IN
THE RATING PERIOD

UPDATED STUDENTS' SCHOOL

RECORDS

MAINTAINED UPDATED
STUDENTS' SCHOOL FORMS

100%

100%

STUDENTS' MASTERY OF
REQUIRED LEARNING
COMPETENCIES PER GRADE
LEVEL

ATTAINED THE REQUIRED GSA

FOR GRADE LEVEL AND
LEARNINGAREAS

100%

100%

PTA MEETINGS/
CONFERENCES ORGANIZED

COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT

CONDUCT PERIODIC PTA

MEETINGS /CONFERENCES

NO. OF UNDERTAKEN/ INITIATED

PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES
PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES
WITH EXTERNAL
INITIATED/ UNDERTAKEN
FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP WITHIN
THE TARGET DATE

NO. OF CONDUCT
PROBLEM/CLASS ROOM BASED
ACTION RESEARCH

VISITED PARENTS OF STUDENTS

NEEDING ACADEMIC
HOME VISITATION CONDUCTED
MONITORING/FOLLOW-UP WITHIN
THE RATING PERIOD

ACTION RESEARCH

PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT

ACTION RESEARCH

NO. OF CONDUCT
PROBLEM/CLASS ROOM BASED
ACTION RESEARCH

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
AND/OR COMMUNITY LINKAGES

NO. OF INITIATED /PARTICIPATED

IN CO-CURRICULAR /SCHOOL
ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE RATING
PERIOD

PUBLISHED WORKS

NO. OF PRODUCED
PUBLICATION /CREATIVE WORK
FOR SCHOOL PAPER/DIVISION
PUBLICATION WITHIN THE
TARGET DATE

Prepared by:

ANNA ROSE C. ENRIQUEZ

Teacher I

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGION III - CENTRAL LUZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
ANAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2015

QUARTER 1
JUL
AUG

PHYSICAL TARGETS
QUARTER 2
QUARTER 3
SEP
OCT
NOV DEC
JAN
FEB

RESOURCE REQUIREMENT
QUARTER 4
MAR APR
MAY

MOV's

19

19

19

16

18

14

18

18

19

UPDATED LESSON
PLAN / DAILY LESSON
LOG

95%

100%

95%

90%

95%

90%

90%

95%

100%

Form 138 (Report on

Learner's Observed
Values)

Attendance Sheet/SF 2

MATERIALS

EQUIPMENT

HUMAN

Office Supplies

Laptop

Teacher

Report card

Laptop, Printer

Teacher, Adviser

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teachers/Adviser
Correction Tape

Attendance Sheet/SF 2

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teachers/Adviser
Correction Tape

Class Record/ Grading

Sheet

Office Supplies

All School Forms

Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teacher/ Adviser
Correction Tape

Form 138, Form 137,

and SF 5

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teacher/ Principal
Correction Tape

Computer, Printer

Teacher

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Correction Tape

Laptop, Printer,
camera

Teacher/ Adviser

Request Letter from

Principal, Agreement
set,and Pictures

Bond Paper,
Ballpen

Laptop, Printer,
camera

Teacher/ Adviser

Acknowldgemnent receipt,
Pictures

Bond Paper

Laptop, Printer, Teacher, Property

camera
Custodian

Action Reasearch

Bond paper,
Ballpen

Laptop, Printer,
Teacher, Principal
Camera

Attendance Sheet,
Minutes of the meeting,
Pictures

Action Reasearch

Bond paper,
Ballpen

Membership Card

Ballpen,ID Picture

Article

Bond paper,
ballpen

Checked by:
LEONARDO D. CONDE
Master Teacher I

Laptop, Printer,
Teacher, Principal
Camera

Teacher

Laptop, Printer

Teacher

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT
Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

TOTAL
AMOUNT

150

50

200

150

550

70

70

70

70

280

50

50

50

50

200

OTHER( INSET
REG. , DONATION
etc).

50

50

50

50

200

80

40

40

40

200

30

30

30

30

120

50

50

50

50

200

50

50

50

50

200

70

70

70

70

280

150

150

300

150

150

130

300

130

100

100

Approved by:
MARYLENE I. ANTALAN, Ed. D.
Sec. Sch. Principal II

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:
ANNA ROSE C. ENRIQUEZ
Position:
Teacher I
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

MFOs

MFO: 2
BASIC
EDUCATION
SERVICES

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Teaching-Learning Prepared
June 2015 to
Process
lesson plans and
April 2016
daily logs of
activities
including
appropriate
adequate and
updated
instructional
materials with in
the rating
period

Weight
per KRA

30%

 Initiated
discipline of
students
including
classroom rules,
guidelines and
individual and
group task with
in the rating
period

June 2015 to
April 2016

Student
Outcomes

Monitored
attendance,
diversity and
appreciation,
safe, positive
and motivating
environment,
overall physical
atmosphere,
cleanliness and
orderliness of
classrooms
including proper
waste disposal
daily

June 2015 to
April 2016

Monitored
and evaluated
and maintained
students'
progress with in
the rating
period

June 2015 to
April 2016

30%

students'
progress with in
the rating
period

MFO: 1
BASIC
EDUCATION
POLICY
SERVICES

Community
Involvement

Maintained
updated
students' school
forms

June 2015 to
April 2016

Attained the
required GSA for
grade level and
learning areas

Once a year

Conducted
periodic PTA
meetings/
conferences

Once every
grading period

30%

MFO: 2
BASIC
EDUCATION
SERVICES

Professional
Growth and
Development

Visited
parents of
students
needing
academic
monitoring/
follow-up with in
the rating
period

Twice every
quarter

Undertaken/
initiated
projects/events/
activities with
external
funding/
sponsorship
within the
target date

Twice a year

Conducted
problem/
classroom based
action research

Once

10%

 Initiated/
Participated
in cocurricular/school
activities with in
the rating
period

June to May

Produced
publications/
creative work
for school
paper/division
publication with
in the target
date

February

* Toget the score, the rating is multiplied by th weight assigned

0
Ratee

Commitment and Review Form

LEONARDO D. CONDE
MASTER TEACHER I

LANNING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,

Efficiency,Timelines)
5 - Outstanding
All daily lesson plans had the following objective,
subject matter,procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to
do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable,
result-oriented and time-bound
130% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attained 130% and above of the desired learning
competencies
130% and above based on the budget of work

4 - Very Satisfactory
Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
Each part of the partial description of what
to do with an example
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral
indicator is missing
115-129% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 115-129% of the desired learning competencies
115-129% based on the approved budget of work

3 - Satisfactory
Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description with out example

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE*

 Objectives was stated with 3-4 behavioral

indicator missing
100-114% develop high order thinking skills
Attained 100-114% of the desired learning competencies
100-114% based on the approved budget of work

2 - Unsatisfactory
Had 2 of the five parts
Each part had no description with out example
Objectives was stated with 1-2 behavioral
indicator missing
51-99% develop high order thinking skills
Attained 51-99% of the desired learning competencies
51-99% based on the approved budget of work

1 - Poor

Had 1 of the five parts

Each part had no description with out example
Objectives was stated without behavioral indicator m
50% and below develop high order thinking skills
50% and below attained the desired learning
competencies
50% and below based on the approved budget of work

5 - Outstanding
Pupils were 130% and the above guided in the observation
of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by
descriptive rating in the report card/journal

4 - Very Satisfactory
Pupils were 115-129% guided in the observation of
classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by
descriptive rating in the report card/journal

3 - Satisfactory
Pupils were 100-114% guided in the observation of
classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by
descriptive rating in the report card/journal

2 - Unsatisfactory
Pupils were 51-99% guided in the observation of

classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by

descriptive rating in the report card/journal

1 - Poor
Pupils were not guided in the observation of classroom
rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating
in the report card/journal

5 - Outstanding
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 130% and above maintained
Attendance checking was 130% and above systematically
carried out

4 - Very Satisfactory
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 115-129% maintained
Attendance checking was 115-129% systematically carried out

3 - Satisfactory
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 100-114% maintained
Attendance checking was 100-114% systematically
carried out

2 - Unsatisfactory
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 51-99% maintained
Attendance checking was 51-99% systematically
carried out

1 - Poor
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 50% and below consistently
maintained
Attendance checking was 50% and below systematically
carried out

5 - Outstanding
Evidence showed that the teacher purposely plans
assessments and varies assessment choices to match the
different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.
Class record reflected the bases of 130% and above of

pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled

Students' portfolio contained 130% and above of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is 130% and above prepared for
tests that require it
Table of specifications showed 130% and above
congruence between content and skills test
Test questions were 130% and above logiclly sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 130% and above administered
in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report
on subject area per class/grade level)

4 - Very Satisfactory
The teacher explained the various uses and limitations
of the different kinds of assessments/test. Evidence
showed that student needs and avenues for growth were
clearly identified.
Class record reflected the bases of 115-129% of pupils'
ratings in all classess/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained 115-129% of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is 115-129% prepared for tests
that require it
Table of specifications showed 115-129% congruence
between content and skills test
Test questions were 115-129% logiclly sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 115-129% administered in all
classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level)

3 - Satisfactory
The evidence of more than one measure of student
performance but there is difficulty in analyzing data to
inform instuctional planning and delivery
Class record reflected the bases of 100-114% of pupils'
ratings in all classes/subject area
Students' portfolio contained 100-114% of his

accomplishment
Table of specifications is 100-114% prepared for tests
that require it
Table of specifications showed 100-114% congruence
between content and skills tested
Test questions were 100-114% logically sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 100-114% administered in all
classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level)

2 - Unsatisfactory
The teacher planned instructions without analyzing
student learning data
Class record reflected the bases of 51-99% of pupils'
ratings in all classess/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained 51-99% of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is 51-99%prepared for tests that
require it
Table of specifications showed 51-99% congruence
between content and skills test
Test questions were 51-99% logiclly sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 51-99% administered in all
classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level)

1 - Poor
No evidence of student monitoring or evaluation of
student progress
Class record reflected the bases of 50% and below of
pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained 50% and below of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is not prepared for tests
that require it
Table of specifications did not show congruence
between content and skills test

 Test questions were not logiclly sequenced

Pretest and Posttest were never administered

5 - Outstanding
130% and above updated students' school records

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% updated students' school records

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% updated students' school records

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% updated students' school records

1 - Poor
50% and below updatedd students' school records

5 - Outstanding
130% and above MPS/GSA

4 - Very Satisfactory
115%-129% MPS/ GSA

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% MPS/GSA

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% MPS/GSA

1 - Poor
50% and below MPS/GSA

5 - Outstanding
130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% of planned meetings producing only set
agreements and partial accomplishments of these

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set
of agreements

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results

1 - Poor
50% and below of the planned meetings conducted
with no result

5 - Outstanding
130% and above accomplishment of set visits successful
interventions

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% accomplishment of visits with partial success in
implementation of interventions

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% accomplishment of visits with suggested planned
interventions

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% accomplishments of visits with planned interventions

1 - Poor
50% and below accomplishments with no interventions

5 - Outstanding
130% and above project accomplishment with full documentation
report on completion

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% project accomplishment with partial completion

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% project initiative only with no completion report

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% project initiative only with no completion report

1 - Poor
No project/event/activity initiated

5 - Outstanding
3 action research conducted with full documentation on
completion of interventions.

4 - Very Satisfactory
2 action research conducted with full documentation on
completion of interventions.

3 - Satisfactory
1 action research conducted with full documentation on
completion of interventions.

2 - Unsatisfactory
Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals

1 - Poor
Only classroom/learning/issues identified

5 - Outstanding
Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results

4 - Very Satisfactory
Initiated and participated in co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results

3 - Satisfactory
Participated in most co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results

2 - Unsatisfactory
Participation only with out document results

1 - Poor
No participation in school Activities

5 - Outstanding
Produced publication/creative work published in National
Circulation/ DepEd Post/ CSC Newsletters and similar publications

4 - Very Satisfactory
Produced publication/creative work published in regional
publications

3 - Satisfactory
Produced publication/creative work published in division
publications

2 - Unsatisfactory
Produced publication/creative work published in school papers

1 - Poor
Unpublished work produced

OVERAL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHM
ENTS

LEONARDO D. CONDE
Rater

AN

PROGRAMS/PROJECT

PHYSICAL OUTPUT

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

2014 ACCOMPLISHENT

QUARTER

2015 ANNUAL TARGET

JUN

TEACHING
AND
LEARNING
PROCESS

DAILY LESSON PLAN AND

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

NO. OF PREPARED DAILY LESSON

PLANS AND DAILY LOGS OF
ACTIVITIES INCLUDING
APPROPRIATE, ADEQUATE AND
UPDATED INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS WITHIN THE RATING
PERIOD.

100%

180

20

CLASS RULES AND WELL

BEHAVED STUDENTS

INITIATED DISCIPLINE OF
STUDENTS INCLUDING
CLASSROOM RULES , GUIDELINES
,INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP TASK
WITHIN RATING PERIOD

100%

95% of learners

100%

100%

100% of students'
attendance
monitored

MONITORED ATTENDANCE,
DIVERSITY,SAFE, POSITIVE AND
POSITIVE/
PRODUCTIVE/
MOTIVATING ENVIRONMENT,
SAFE LEARNING
CLEANLINESS AND ORDERLINESS

ENVIRONMENT

MONITORED ATTENDANCE,
DIVERSITY,SAFE, POSITIVE AND
POSITIVE/
PRODUCTIVE/
MOTIVATING ENVIRONMENT,
SAFE LEARNING
CLEANLINESS AND ORDERLINESS
ENVIRONMENT
OF CLASSROOMS INCLUDING
PROPER WASTE DISPOSAL.

STUDENTS
OUTCOMES

100%

100% of students'
attendance
monitored

COMPLETE AND ACCURATE

CLASS RECORD

MONITORED AND EVALUATED

STUDENTS PROGRESS WITH IN
THE RATING PERIOD

UPDATED STUDENTS' SCHOOL

RECORDS

MAINTAINED UPDATED
STUDENTS' SCHOOL FORMS

100%

100%

STUDENTS' MASTERY OF
REQUIRED LEARNING
COMPETENCIES PER GRADE
LEVEL

ATTAINED THE REQUIRED GSA

FOR GRADE LEVEL AND
LEARNINGAREAS

100%

100%

PTA MEETINGS/
CONFERENCES ORGANIZED

COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT

CONDUCT PERIODIC PTA

MEETINGS /CONFERENCES

NO. OF UNDERTAKEN/ INITIATED

PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES
PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES
WITH EXTERNAL
INITIATED/ UNDERTAKEN
FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP WITHIN
THE TARGET DATE

NO. OF CONDUCT
PROBLEM/CLASS ROOM BASED
ACTION RESEARCH

VISITED PARENTS OF STUDENTS

NEEDING ACADEMIC
HOME VISITATION CONDUCTED
MONITORING/FOLLOW-UP WITHIN
THE RATING PERIOD

ACTION RESEARCH

PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT

ACTION RESEARCH

NO. OF CONDUCT
PROBLEM/CLASS ROOM BASED
ACTION RESEARCH

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
AND/OR COMMUNITY LINKAGES

NO. OF INITIATED /PARTICIPATED

IN CO-CURRICULAR /SCHOOL
ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE RATING
PERIOD

PUBLISHED WORKS

NO. OF PRODUCED
PUBLICATION /CREATIVE WORK
FOR SCHOOL PAPER/DIVISION
PUBLICATION WITHIN THE
TARGET DATE

Prepared by:

JACQUELINE P. BENAVIDES
Teacher I

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGION III - CENTRAL LUZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
ANAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2015

QUARTER 1
JUL
AUG

PHYSICAL TARGETS
QUARTER 2
QUARTER 3
SEP
OCT
NOV DEC
JAN
FEB

RESOURCE REQUIREMENT
QUARTER 4
MAR APR
MAY

MOV's

19

19

19

16

18

14

18

18

19

UPDATED LESSON
PLAN / DAILY LESSON
LOG

95%

100%

95%

90%

95%

90%

90%

95%

100%

Form 138 (Report on

Learner's Observed
Values)

Attendance Sheet/SF 2

MATERIALS

EQUIPMENT

HUMAN

Office Supplies

Laptop

Teacher

Report card

Laptop, Printer

Teacher, Adviser

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teachers/Adviser
Correction Tape

Attendance Sheet/SF 2

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teachers/Adviser
Correction Tape

Class Record/ Grading

Sheet

Office Supplies

All School Forms

Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teacher/ Adviser
Correction Tape

Form 138, Form 137,

and SF 5

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Computer, Printer Teacher/ Principal
Correction Tape

Computer, Printer

Teacher

Bond Paper,
Ballpen,
Correction Tape

Laptop, Printer,
camera

Teacher/ Adviser

Request Letter from

Principal, Agreement
set,and Pictures

Bond Paper,
Ballpen

Laptop, Printer,
camera

Teacher/ Adviser

Acknowldgemnent receipt,
Pictures

Bond Paper

Laptop, Printer, Teacher, Property

camera
Custodian

Action Reasearch

Bond paper,
Ballpen

Laptop, Printer,
Teacher, Principal
Camera

Attendance Sheet,
Minutes of the meeting,
Pictures

Action Reasearch

Bond paper,
Ballpen

Membership Card

Ballpen,ID Picture

Article

Bond paper,
ballpen

Checked by:
LEONARDO D. CONDE
Master Teacher I

Laptop, Printer,
Teacher, Principal
Camera

Teacher

Laptop, Printer

Teacher

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT
Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

TOTAL
AMOUNT

150

50

200

150

550

70

70

70

70

280

50

50

50

50

200

OTHER( INSET
REG. , DONATION
etc).

50

50

50

50

200

80

40

40

40

200

30

30

30

30

120

50

50

50

50

200

50

50

50

50

200

70

70

70

70

280

150

150

300

150

150

130

300

130

100

100

Approved by:
MARYLENE I. ANTALAN, Ed. D.
Sec. Sch. Principal II

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:
ANNA ROSE C. ENRIQUEZ
Position:
Teacher I
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

MFOs

MFO: 2
BASIC
EDUCATION
SERVICES

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Teaching-Learning Prepared
June 2015 to
Process
lesson plans and
April 2016
daily logs of
activities
including
appropriate
adequate and
updated
instructional
materials with in
the rating
period

Weight
per KRA

30%

 Initiated
discipline of
students
including
classroom rules,
guidelines and
individual and
group task with
in the rating
period

June 2015 to
April 2016

Student
Outcomes

Monitored
attendance,
diversity and
appreciation,
safe, positive
and motivating
environment,
overall physical
atmosphere,
cleanliness and
orderliness of
classrooms
including proper
waste disposal
daily

June 2015 to
April 2016

Monitored
and evaluated
and maintained
students'
progress with in
the rating
period

June 2015 to
April 2016

30%

students'
progress with in
the rating
period

MFO: 1
BASIC
EDUCATION
POLICY
SERVICES

Community
Involvement

Maintained
updated
students' school
forms

June 2015 to
April 2016

Attained the
required GSA for
grade level and
learning areas

Once a year

Conducted
periodic PTA
meetings/
conferences

Once every
grading period

30%

MFO: 2
BASIC
EDUCATION
SERVICES

Professional
Growth and
Development

Visited
parents of
students
needing
academic
monitoring/
follow-up with in
the rating
period

Twice every
quarter

Undertaken/
initiated
projects/events/
activities with
external
funding/
sponsorship
within the
target date

Twice a year

Conducted
problem/
classroom based
action research

Once

10%

 Initiated/
Participated
in cocurricular/school
activities with in
the rating
period

June to May

Produced
publications/
creative work
for school
paper/division
publication with
in the target
date

February

* Toget the score, the rating is multiplied by th weight assigned

0
Ratee

Commitment and Review Form

LEONARDO D. CONDE
MASTER TEACHER I

LANNING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,

Efficiency,Timelines)
5 - Outstanding
All daily lesson plans had the following objective,
subject matter,procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to
do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable,
result-oriented and time-bound
130% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attained 130% and above of the desired learning
competencies
130% and above based on the budget of work

4 - Very Satisfactory
Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
Each part of the partial description of what
to do with an example
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral
indicator is missing
115-129% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 115-129% of the desired learning competencies
115-129% based on the approved budget of work

3 - Satisfactory
Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description with out example

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE*

 Objectives was stated with 3-4 behavioral

indicator missing
100-114% develop high order thinking skills
Attained 100-114% of the desired learning competencies
100-114% based on the approved budget of work

2 - Unsatisfactory
Had 2 of the five parts
Each part had no description with out example
Objectives was stated with 1-2 behavioral
indicator missing
51-99% develop high order thinking skills
Attained 51-99% of the desired learning competencies
51-99% based on the approved budget of work

1 - Poor

Had 1 of the five parts

Each part had no description with out example
Objectives was stated without behavioral indicator m
50% and below develop high order thinking skills
50% and below attained the desired learning
competencies
50% and below based on the approved budget of work

5 - Outstanding
Pupils were 130% and the above guided in the observation
of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by
descriptive rating in the report card/journal

4 - Very Satisfactory
Pupils were 115-129% guided in the observation of
classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by
descriptive rating in the report card/journal

3 - Satisfactory
Pupils were 100-114% guided in the observation of
classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by
descriptive rating in the report card/journal

2 - Unsatisfactory
Pupils were 51-99% guided in the observation of

classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by

descriptive rating in the report card/journal

1 - Poor
Pupils were not guided in the observation of classroom
rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating
in the report card/journal

5 - Outstanding
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 130% and above maintained
Attendance checking was 130% and above systematically
carried out

4 - Very Satisfactory
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 115-129% maintained
Attendance checking was 115-129% systematically carried out

3 - Satisfactory
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 100-114% maintained
Attendance checking was 100-114% systematically
carried out

2 - Unsatisfactory
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 51-99% maintained
Attendance checking was 51-99% systematically
carried out

1 - Poor
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal were 50% and below consistently
maintained
Attendance checking was 50% and below systematically
carried out

5 - Outstanding
Evidence showed that the teacher purposely plans
assessments and varies assessment choices to match the
different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.
Class record reflected the bases of 130% and above of

pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled

Students' portfolio contained 130% and above of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is 130% and above prepared for
tests that require it
Table of specifications showed 130% and above
congruence between content and skills test
Test questions were 130% and above logiclly sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 130% and above administered
in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report
on subject area per class/grade level)

4 - Very Satisfactory
The teacher explained the various uses and limitations
of the different kinds of assessments/test. Evidence
showed that student needs and avenues for growth were
clearly identified.
Class record reflected the bases of 115-129% of pupils'
ratings in all classess/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained 115-129% of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is 115-129% prepared for tests
that require it
Table of specifications showed 115-129% congruence
between content and skills test
Test questions were 115-129% logiclly sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 115-129% administered in all
classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level)

3 - Satisfactory
The evidence of more than one measure of student
performance but there is difficulty in analyzing data to
inform instuctional planning and delivery
Class record reflected the bases of 100-114% of pupils'
ratings in all classes/subject area
Students' portfolio contained 100-114% of his

accomplishment
Table of specifications is 100-114% prepared for tests
that require it
Table of specifications showed 100-114% congruence
between content and skills tested
Test questions were 100-114% logically sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 100-114% administered in all
classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level)

2 - Unsatisfactory
The teacher planned instructions without analyzing
student learning data
Class record reflected the bases of 51-99% of pupils'
ratings in all classess/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained 51-99% of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is 51-99%prepared for tests that
require it
Table of specifications showed 51-99% congruence
between content and skills test
Test questions were 51-99% logiclly sequenced
Pretest and Posttest were 51-99% administered in all
classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on
subject area per class/grade level)

1 - Poor
No evidence of student monitoring or evaluation of
student progress
Class record reflected the bases of 50% and below of
pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained 50% and below of his
accomplishment
Table of specifications is not prepared for tests
that require it
Table of specifications did not show congruence
between content and skills test

 Test questions were not logiclly sequenced

Pretest and Posttest were never administered

5 - Outstanding
130% and above updated students' school records

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% updated students' school records

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% updated students' school records

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% updated students' school records

1 - Poor
50% and below updatedd students' school records

5 - Outstanding
130% and above MPS/GSA

4 - Very Satisfactory
115%-129% MPS/ GSA

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% MPS/GSA

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% MPS/GSA

1 - Poor
50% and below MPS/GSA

5 - Outstanding
130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% of planned meetings producing only set
agreements and partial accomplishments of these

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set
of agreements

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results

1 - Poor
50% and below of the planned meetings conducted
with no result

5 - Outstanding
130% and above accomplishment of set visits successful
interventions

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% accomplishment of visits with partial success in
implementation of interventions

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% accomplishment of visits with suggested planned
interventions

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% accomplishments of visits with planned interventions

1 - Poor
50% and below accomplishments with no interventions

5 - Outstanding
130% and above project accomplishment with full documentation
report on completion

4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% project accomplishment with partial completion

3 - Satisfactory
100-114% project initiative only with no completion report

2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% project initiative only with no completion report

1 - Poor
No project/event/activity initiated

5 - Outstanding
3 action research conducted with full documentation on
completion of interventions.

4 - Very Satisfactory
2 action research conducted with full documentation on
completion of interventions.

3 - Satisfactory
1 action research conducted with full documentation on
completion of interventions.

2 - Unsatisfactory
Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals

1 - Poor
Only classroom/learning/issues identified

5 - Outstanding
Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results

4 - Very Satisfactory
Initiated and participated in co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results

3 - Satisfactory
Participated in most co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results

2 - Unsatisfactory
Participation only with out document results

1 - Poor
No participation in school Activities

5 - Outstanding
Produced publication/creative work published in National
Circulation/ DepEd Post/ CSC Newsletters and similar publications

4 - Very Satisfactory
Produced publication/creative work published in regional
publications

3 - Satisfactory
Produced publication/creative work published in division
publications

2 - Unsatisfactory
Produced publication/creative work published in school papers

1 - Poor
Unpublished work produced

OVERAL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHM
ENTS

LEONARDO D. CONDE
Rater