6

26 ..2558

Prosocial of Students of Faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University
*

.
Dr.Theerapat Wongkumsin

1)
2)

616 1)
2)
.05 .01



: ,

Abstract
The objectives of this study were; 1) to study the level of prosocial behavior of students of
faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University, and 2) to compare prosocial behavior of students of
faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University by personal factors. The samples of this study were 616
students of faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University. The results of this study indicated that 1) the
prosocial behavior of students of faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University was at rather high
levels, 2) students of faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University who had various in gender and
department had difference prosocial behavior with the statistical significant at .01 and .05 level
*

[134]

respectively, and students of faculty of Social Sciences at Kasetsart University who had various in birth
order, academic level, GPA, program, income, activity participation, domicile, marital status of parents,
head of the family, educational level of head of the family, occupation of head of the family, and family
income have not difference prosocial behavior.
Keyword: Prosocial Behavior, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kasetsart University

11 (..2555-2559)

11 (..2555-2559)
/



3 11 (..2555-2559)







(, 2556)



(, 2557: 5)

(Gibbs, 2003: 112) (
[135]

 , 2544: 348)
( , 2553: 215)




( , 2550: 12-13)


..2542 ( 2) ( 3) ..2553

(, 2553: 3)

1.
2.

1. 2557 3,512
2. 2557 616
(Proportional Stratified Random Sampling)
Yamane (1973 , 2547) .04

3
1 (Check List)
12
2 Eisenberg, Cameron
and Tryon (1984) (Rating Scale) 3 27
- ..2558
[136]



t-test F-test

1
1
1 ( x ) (S.D.)

S.D.

x

3.79
.50

3.71
.54

3.73
.57

3.93
.60

2
2
2 (t) (F)



t
F
p-value

-3.623**
.000
ns

.578
.658

.890
.209 ns
.946
.125 ns

.642
-.465 ns

2.999*
.011
ns

.683
.382

.079
-1.762 ns
[137]

 2 ()

t
-

F
2.007 ns
.055 ns
1.949 ns
.723 ns
.931 ns
.474 ns

p-value
.135
.946
.143
.538
.472
.796

2
.01 .05

3.79













(, 2557)



[138]


(2543: 122)





.01






(2542:39)

Ruble (1983 cited in Shaffer, 2003: 233)

.05
6





Feldman and Theodore (1970: 153)


( 3.82)

[139]

(Participatory Learning) (Group Counseling) (Group
Dynamics) (Simulation Method) (Role Playing Method)
(Field Trips) ( , 2558)

1.

2.

. (2557).
2 557. : .
. (2544). . 3. : .
. (2558). . : .
. (2553). . : .
. (2547). . : .
. 2550. .
44 (1): 12-17.
. (2543). . :
.
. (2556). 11 (. .2555-2559).
: .

[140]

__________. (2552). . .2542 ( 2) ( 3) ..

2553. : .
. (2542). . : 1999 .
Eisenberg, Nancy, E. Cameron and K. Tryon. (1984). Development and Maintenance of Prosocial
Behavior: International Perspectives on Positive Morality. New York: Plenum Press.
Feldman, Kenneth A. and Theodore, M.N. (1970). The Impact of College Students. San Francisco: JosseyBass Inc.
Shaffer, David R. (2003). Social and Personality Development. 4th ed. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

[141]