Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indian IT Companies
Indian IT Companies are dumping Bell Curve appraisal system. Perspectives of 3
Indian IT Companies HCL, Infy and Accenture are presented here.
similar mechanisms for conducting annual performance appraisals of their employees. The move
at Accenture is aimed at ongoing real-time feedback and spells good news for its 3.36 lakh global
employees, nearly 30% of whom are based in India.
Typically, the bell-curve mechanism segregates all employees into distinct baskets-top, average
and bottom performers - with the vast majority being treated as average performers.
The reasons for this continued trend of companies discarding the bell-curve rating mechanism
are manifold.
"Today, goals are no longer pushed from the top level to the bottom, but emerge through
collaboration and are the result of a dynamic interplay between levels and various parts of the
organization. To follow the typical bell-curve, team leaders had to re-categorize employees.
Often good performers were labelled as average to fit the curve. This unseen hand of moderation
resulted in disgruntled and disengaged employees," explains M P Sriram, partner at Aventus
Partners, a HR consultancy and talent acquisition firm.
"We are shifting from an annual 'performance management' process to a new 'performance
achievement' approach that includes real-time, forward-looking conversations about setting
priorities, growing strengths and creating rewarding career opportunities for our people. The
'performance achievement' approach will focus on the achievements and talents of each
employee. It will result in a holistic view of performance and potential and guide in appropriate
decision making relating to rewards and career progression. Our leaders will spend more time
coaching and talking with employees. We are on a journey and are committed to moving at the
right pace to roll this out across the organization," Accenture-India confirmed in response to
TOI's queries.
This April, KPMG in India discarded the bell-curve and introduced a real-time feedback
approach. Employees are now given an instant feedback when they complete an engagement:
they can thus work on their areas of development on an ongoing basis, and it avoids the year-end
appraisal related disappointments, if any.
"We have introduced this change for the current year (the performance year ending March 2016)
and hence providing the requisite training and preparing the managers (responsible for giving the
feedback) to handle the new process is all currently work-in-progress. Training and hand-holding
our people is clearly a critical part of successfully managing the transition to the changed
approach," says Shalini Pillay, head-people, performance and culture at KPMG-India. As this
change requires a serious realignment in mind-set, culture and way of working, the benefits of
the new mechanism will not be immediately quantified.
The shift away from the bell-curve or similar one-time ranking mechanisms seems to be gaining
ground, especially in the consultancy and technology sector, where human assets (employees) are
invaluable. Application of the bell-curve doesn't suit a knowledge-driven workforce. A mid-tier
software company has replaced the bell-curve with the performance-curve based on the long tail
method.
The aim is to identify, reward and develop skills in hyper-high performers, high performers,
potential high performers, and so on till one reaches the end of the tail. The difference being that
employees are not compared against each other and there is no cap on the number of people who
can fall within a particular segment. Another large consultancy, in the Big 4 league, has recently
re-designed its performance management system. The new system is yet to be scaled up and
rolled out globally and has not yet been taken up in India..
Recommended By Colombia
"The two basic pillars for successfully transitioning are rating absolute performance (rather than
'relative' performance, which the bell-curve measured) and having constant conversations," says
Sriram.
"Employees should be explained that a regular feedback will enable a continuous learning
culture, it will encourage them to be risk-taking, innovative and more collaborative. From the
team-leaders' perspective, as the ownership of the process lies with them (and not the unseen
hand of moderation), it empowers them, helps them make effective compensation decisions and
above all results in honest conversation with individual team members," adds Sriram