Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
C 2004)
Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 29, No. 1, Fall 2004 (
67
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
68
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
works included in the freshman year courses of the common curriculum (University Seminar (USem 1000); Christian Formation (UFdns 1000), and Character and
the Community (UCor 1000)) are as follows: Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass,
autobiography by Frederick Douglass, Great expectations, novel by Charles Dickens;
Skin of our teeth, play by Thornton Wilder; Porgy and Bess, opera by George Gershwin;
Sistine Chapel, painting by Michelangelo; The chosen, novel by Chaim Potok; Imitation
of Christ, by Thomas A Kempis; Devotional classics, by Richard Foster, and The book of
common prayer.
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
69
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
70
July 7, 2004
1:3
Newman wrote,
in the minds energetic and simultaneous action upon and towards and
among those new ideas. . . . It is the action of a formative power, reducing
to order and meaning the matter of our acquirements . . . it is a digestion
of what we receive, into the substance of our previous state of thought.
(1873/1947, pp. 1189)
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
71
University he will just know where he and his science stand, he has come
to it, as it were, from a height, he has taken a survey of all knowledge, he is
kept from extravagance by the very rivalry of other studies, he has gained
from them a special illumination and largeness of mind and freedom and
self possession, and he treats his own in consequence with a philosophy
and a resource, which belongs not to the study itself, but to his liberal
education. (1873/1947, p. 147)
Henry Demarest Lloyds Wealth against the Commonwealth (1894) Holding back
the riches of earth, sea, and sky from their fellows who famish and freeze in the dark,
they [the syndicates and trusts] . . . assert the right, for their private profit, to regulate
the consumption by the people of the necessaries of life, and to control production, not
by the needs of humanity, but by the desires of few for dividends. (Quoted in Spiegel,
2003, p. xvi)
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
72
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
Wiggins, 1998, pp. 2832) lead me, by the third time I offered the seminar in 2001, to design three modules to undergird my overarching
question for the course: one around the struggle between labor and
management over working conditions and wages, a second around the
struggle between consumers and management over the reliability of a
firms products, and a third around the struggle between environmentalists and management over pollution.
To mobilize students inquiry about each module, I asked students
to agree or disagree with the provocative statement Whats good for
the corporation is good for its workers/consumers/environment, and
I invited the students to defend or attack this controversial proposition using print and electronic resources in the University library for
their research. Students wrote microthemes (Bean, 1996, pp. 7983)
to enhance their writing skills (amounting to 30% of their grade) and
were allowed to choose other cases, novels, biographies around the labor, environmental or consumer movements as the subject of an oral
presentation (amounting to 10% of the grade). Through these various
explorations I encouraged my students to make interdisciplinary connections, to take what Newman described as a comprehensive view of
truth in all its branches (1873/1947, p. 91). Some of these connections
are outlined below.
I structured each module by providing a couple of cases, one earlier in
the twentieth century and one later, which I thought would sustain student interest. The module on the labor movement began with the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire in New York City in 1911 in which 146 young
women died when they were trapped high up in a Washington Place
building. It remains one of the most vivid symbols of the American labor movement of the need for government to ensure a safe workplace
(Cannon, 1995). The second case was of a mining operation, concluded
in 1990, of W. R. Grace & Co. in Libby, Montana, in which many miners
died from a particularly toxic form of asbestos. The topic that was of
greatest interest to my students was the student led anti-sweatshop
movement. I asked them to read articles on the way sweatshops exploit
workers and others that considered the limits of the argument that low
wage factory jobs alleviate poverty and accelerate economic development. Finally, I situated the debate in the American communities from
which jobs have been removed by asking about the responsibility of
corporations to help stabilize these communities. In each case, I tried
to engage the students in a larger set of relationships that would help
them connect the issues to other domains. It was in this context that the
class discussed the Douglass Narrative commented on at length below.
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
73
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
74
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
75
The fourth, and final, category of questions concerns the responsibilities that ownership entails. These questions focus on meeting the needs
of those within and outside the Christian community (pp. 1423). This
category is consistent with John Wesleys dictum, if those who gain all
they can and save all they can, will likewise give all they can, then
the more they will grow in grace (Maddox, 2001).
My students found Wheelers first two sets of questions helpful in discussing their own response to consumerism. It was her third category
about justice in the accumulation, use, and distribution of wealth that
my students saw as directly applicable to the way many corporations
have exploited many for the profit of the few. However, Christian engagement in efforts at systematic reform of the organization and ownership of corporations has been very difficult (Korten, 1995; Schumacher,
1973). As Wheeler pointed out, because of the complexity and
intractability of structural or systematic inequities in the socioeconomic
mechanisms of a society, there will always be room for disagreement
about the most effective and appropriate strategy for redressing such
injustices (p. 141).
In summary, situated in a Christian university for whom the
Christian Scriptures serve as the central and privileged text of the community, I sought to frame my teaching around some essential questions
raised by Wheeler regarding the biblical material on wealth and possessions. These questions were provocative and multilayered and revealed
the richness and complexity of the issues we were discussing (McTighe
& Wiggins, p. 28). Practically speaking, these are questions which my
students can and should be asking again and again over the course of
their lives; questions which have no one right answer but open up important perspectives at individual, institutional and economy-wide levels.
Common Texts
Newmans view was that students would become civilized by acquaintance with the literatures and histories of ancient Greece and
Rome. Newman defended the importance of this literary framework in
a quotation from Dr. Edward Copleston,4
In the cultivation of literature is found that common link, which, among
the higher and middling departments of life, unites the jarring sects and
4 Dr.
Copleston was provost of Oriel College, Oxford from 18141828 where Newman
became a fellow in 1821.
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
76
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
subdivisions into one interest, which supplies common topics, and kindles common feelings, unmixed with those narrow prejudices with which
all professions are more or less infected. The knowledge, too, which is
thus acquired, expands and enlarges the mind, excites its faculties, and
calls those limbs and muscles into freer exercise which, by too constant
use in one direction, not only acquire an illiberal air, but are apt also
to lose somewhat of their native play and energy. And thus, without directly qualifying a man for any of the employments of life, it enriches and
ennobles all. (1873/1947, pp. 14950)
One of the hopes behind the selection of a common text for the University Seminar classes was that it might help foster an intellectual
community around the themes of the chosen work. As the quotation
from Copleston illustrated, this can counteract a tendency of many
professions to overspecialize and focus on practical knowledge. It was
hoped too, that the text might provide a basis for a larger discussion
beyond the classroom. The text chosen, the Narrative of the Life of
Frederick Douglass, stands out as the most representative and superbly crafted (Houston A. Baker, quoted in Gallagher, 1998) slave
narrative. Gallagher (1998) noted that
[t]he slave narrative most obviously serves to provide a testimony, a moral
witness against the outrages of slavery. Dispelling many prevalent northern myths, Douglass chronicles the deliberate dehumanization caused by
the slave system: slaves lack of adequate food, clothing and shelter; families are systematically destroyed; male and female slaves are brutally
whipped and sometimes killed; African women are used as sexual objects
by white masters.
Although not every student will have the same learning experience
from reading this book (Higbee, 2000), it serves as an important way
of introducing students to the universitys core values. For example,
the book illustrates the first theme discussed above of how education
can liberate, or enlarge the mind. This is revealed in Douglasss own
quotation of his master saying that: Learning would spoil the best
nigger in the world . . . It would forever unfit him to be a slave. He would
at once become unmanageable, and of no value to his master (Douglass,
1845/1995, p. 57).
Another example is the way Douglasss story also raises the troubling question, related to the second theme discussed above, of how the
Christian Scriptures can be used to support slavery. His story documents the cruelty of pious Christian slaveowners, and yet Douglass
can still distinguish between the Christianity of the slaveowners and
the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ. As Tom
Amorose (1998, p. 5) pointed out,
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
77
Douglass rails against a society that espouses Christian values yet remains blind to the evils of slaveholding. We, along with Douglass, ask
how could such evil remain invisible? But then, almost immediately, we
are forced to ask how many evils in our world we choose to ignore, heedless
of the call for biblical justice.
Flesher and Flesher (1980) provided corroborating evidence that, before the Civil War, human assets did appear in the accounting records
grouped together with the animals and implements. Accounting thus
also becomes part of the network of power relations (Miller & OLeary,
1987, p. 240) which was built into the very fabric of slavery as a socioeconomic system.
In summary, by selecting the Narrative as a common text, the University is seeking to build an intellectual community through the promotion of common learning experiences. The moving description of
Frederick Douglasss life as a slave is a way to help bridge the racial
barriers of American life today (Higbee, 2000, p. 52). It also raises
themes such as freedom and identity and the contrast between nominal and true Christianity. In my seminar, I related these themes
to the labor movement from the plight of children and immigrant
workers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to
the present day with the recent WTO protests against the use of
child labor.
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
78
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
Conclusions
Newmans The idea of a university provided a way of conceptualizing
the design of my University Seminar class. The opportunity to teach
first-quarter freshmen, many of whom have not decided on a major,
provided the best possible forum for drawing connections and for introducing my students to the terrain around my discipline. Newman
saw these interrelationships as the hallmark of a liberal education.
Perhaps even more valuable for me was that, given my students lack
of accounting training, I was forced to view the pictures in the annual report and read the narrative accompanying them rather than
just study the financial information. This helped me put my subject
matter in a larger set of relationships and led me to consider a lot
of literature that does not intrinsically belong to the field of
accounting.
As a result of this experience, I chose the theme of corporate social
responsibility for the substance of my seminar. To galvanize student
interest and inquiry around this theme, I began with the assertion
Whats good for (name of corporation), is good for America? This overarching question served to highlight the limitations of a laissez faire
approach to economics. Our review of the labor, environmental, and
consumer movements of the twentieth century demonstrated that one
cause cel`ebre after another catalyzed the government to act out of regard for the public interest. This struggle to bring trans market values
to corporate decision making allowed me to build connections across
disciplines, to practice the kind of holistic thinking Newman called
for.
A second theme reported on has been the attempt to understand my
topic in the context of Christian theology. Newmans contention was
that the Scriptures, the central and privileged text of the Christian
community for those who acknowledge its moral authority, should provide a higher tribunal before which each discipline should be brought.
My students and I found that theological beliefs did not provide pat answers about what we should own or how we should provide for necessary
food, shelter and clothing, but that they did challenge our assumptions
about the role of possessions in forming our identity and in shaping the
practical choices we make.
We also found that the Scriptures concern for economic justice raised
questions about the coercive or exploitative practices of corporations in
labor, management and marketing. Schumacher (1973, p. 284), for example, suggested that in small-scale firms, private ownership is natural
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
79
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge the contribution made to this research
by Seattle Pacific University and the Center for Teaching at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst where I spent my sabbatical leave
in 20002001. In particular, I want to thank Dr. Mary Deane Sorcinelli,
Director of the Center for Teaching and Associate Provost for Faculty
Development, and Dr. Mathew Ouellett, Associate Director of the Center for Teaching for their helpful comments on an earlier version of
this paper. Former colleagues in the School of Business & Economics
at Seattle Pacific also provided helpful comments on an earlier draft
Gary Karns, Denise Daniels, Loren Gustafson, Ross Stewart, Carolyn
Strand, and Kenman Wong. I want to also thank the reviewers of this
journal for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this
manuscript.
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
80
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
References
Amorose, T. (1998, Autumn). Shaping the SPU Canon why choose the Douglass narrative? Response, 4-5.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging Ideas: The professors guide to integrating writing, critical
thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bransford, J. D., Brown A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind,
experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Cannon, D. J. (1995). Triangle Shirtwaist Fire. In K. T. Jackson, (Ed.), The encyclopedia
of New York City (pp. 212213). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.
Cooper, D. J., & Sherer, M. J. (1984). The value of corporate accounting reports: Arguments
for a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 207
232.
Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship
of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Daloz, L. A., Keen, C. H., Keen, J. P., & Parks, S. D. (1996). Common fire: Lives of commitment in a complex world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Douglass, F. (1845/1995). Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass. New York, NY: Dover.
Flesher, D. L., & Flesher, T. K. (1980). Human resource accounting in Mississippi before
1865. Accounting and Business Research, 10, 124129.
Gallagher, S. V. (1998, Autumn). Claiming oneself: An introduction to the narrative of
the life of Frederick Douglass. Response, 4-5.
Graves, F. O., Flesher, D. L., & Jordan, R. E. (1996). Pictures and the bottom line: The television epistemology of U.S. annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society,
21, 5784.
Higbee, M. (2000). Frederick Douglass and todays college classroom. Thought and Action,
XVI(1), 4154.
Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 251261.
Korten, D. C. (1995). When corporations rule the world. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
Maddox, R. L. (2001). Visit the poor Wesleys precedent for holistic mission.
Transformation: An International Dialogue on Mission and Ethics, 18(1), 37
50.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Miller, P., & OLeary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 251261.
Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: Towards a new epistemology for
accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 477485.
Nader, R. (1965). Unsafe at any speed: The designed-in dangers of the American automobile. New York, NY: Grossman.
Newman, J. H. (1873/1947). The idea of a university (C. F. Harrold, Ed.). New York, NY:
Longmans, Green. (Original work published 1852)
Newman, J. H. (1891/1996). The idea of a university (F. M. Turner, Ed.). New Haven, CT:
Yale University. (Original work published 1852)
Niemark, M. D. (1992). The hidden dimensions of annual reports. Princeton, NJ: Markus
Wiener.
Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Parks, S. D. (1993). Is it too late? Young adults and the formation of professional ethics.
In T. R. Piper, M. C. Gentile, & S. D. Parks (Eds.), Can ethics be taught? (pp. 1372).
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
P1: KEF
Innovative Higher Education
ph282-ihie-489991
July 7, 2004
1:3
81
Pelikan, J. (1992). The idea of a university: A reexamination. New Haven, CT: Yale
University.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York,
NY: Harper Row.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1962). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). New York, NY:
Harper and Row.
Spiegel, M. (2003). Battling the titans: The era of the great expose. In U. Sinclair, The
jungle (pp. xvxxix). New York, NY: Barns & Noble Classics. (Original work published
1906.)
Turner, F. M. (1996). Editors preface. In F. M. Turner (Ed.), The Idea of a University
(pp. ixxi). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wheeler, S. E. (1995). Wealth as peril and obligation. Grand Rapids, MI: William B.
Eerdmans.